►
From YouTube: CDEvents / SIG Events Vocabulary Meeting - June 28, 2022
Description
For more Continuous Delivery Foundation content, check out our blog: https://cd.foundation/blog/
A
A
B
No,
there
was
a
presentation
at
my
sound
school,
so
she
went
there
to
see
his
presentation,
but
then
some
some
lesson
and
we
have
to
get
it
again.
Pick
him
up
after
school
to.
A
Yeah,
okay,
it's
it's
a
bit
robotic
or
metallic,
but
I
think
we
are
here
at
least
that's
the
problem.
So
let's
try
have
you
heard
from
anyone
if
they
plan
to
join
or
not
join
or
anything.
A
B
Yeah
yeah,
okay,
let's,
let's
make
maybe
and
quick
one,
the
two
of
us
yeah
I
I'm,
sharing
the
the
agenda.
Yeah.
A
A
B
Interested
in
joining
the
alternate
I'm
in
terms
of
time,
there
is
not
like
a
strong
winner
and
it's
yeah
like
10,
UTC
and
11
UTC
are
the
most
voted
ones
right
now:
okay,
that's
a
preferred
date.
It
looks
like
any
day
beginning
of
the
week
and
they
get
the
same
amount
us
interests,
so
Monday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
so
I
think
I
was
hoping
to
get
some
more
responses,
but
I
think
in
general.
It's
it's
positive
towards
setting
up
this
new
meeting.
A
A
reflection
from
from
mind
was
that
I
looked
at
my
calendar.
My
work
calendar
at
the
same
time
when
filling
in
the
the
poll
and
I
realized
that
well
some
days
it
works
good,
sometimes
some
days
it
works
good
in
other
slots,
but
foreign.
It
was
a
bit
hard
to
to
say
generally
for
any
weekday.
These
times
are
good
or
bad
or
such,
but
as
I
have
some
recurring
meetings
during
the
day
in
certain
days
which
might
complex.
B
Yeah
yeah
sorry
I
did
probably
didn't
choose
the
right.
The
right
to
I
mean
I
can
I
can
make
another
poll,
but
I
didn't
want
to.
You
know,
got
already
some
responses
on
this.
One
and
I
thought.
Okay,
they
make
another
one.
Then.
B
A
B
B
A
One
thing
that
strikes
strikes
me
as
well
is
that
there
might
be
conflicts
in
the
CDF
calendar
I'm,
not
sure.
If
that's
a
big
problem
I
know
before
we,
we
said
that
we
shouldn't
conflict
with,
for
example,
the
best
practices
taken,
those
and
some
and
some
other
and
the
interoperability
in
the
beginning.
B
B
A
lot
of
sense,
okay
for
the
existing
meeting,
I
think
most
people
definitely
would
like
to
stay
where
we
are
today.
B
I
know
going
later
would
be.
A
problem
for
Abby
would
be
not
not
very
convenient
to
share
for
everyone
in
CET.
A
Yeah
I
don't
know
what
to
do,
because
there
is
of
course,
an
initiative
attending
at
eight
o'clock
in
the
morning.
I
think
it
is
Pacific
time.
I
totally
see
that's
a
problem
for
many
people
in
Pacific
region,
but
I
mean
that
some
the
option
could
be
to
have
three
different
slots
instead,
but
that's
not
good
either.
So
you.
B
Can't
really
say:
yeah
yeah
I
mean
with
the
new
meeting
in
the
in
the
morning,
I
guess
that
that
should
be
more
accessible
to
everyone
in
in
CET,
right.
A
A
A
So
so
the
idea
now
is:
is
it
to
keep
the
sigma
things
bi-weekly
and
then
have
weekly
vocabulary
meetings
but
ultimate
alternate
alternate
between
the
Apex
trendy
time
and
the
in
here.
Every
time.
A
A
Then
I
think
the
the
Sig
meetings
will
be
more
even
more
like
Logistics
and
that
kind
of
topics
and
then
the
vocabulary
meeting
should
be
every
week.
I
guess
then,
but
alternating
times.
A
B
B
Okay,
I
guess
we
don't
have
a
really
a
good
decision
for
this
change,
but
maybe
we
can
start
doing
the
new
meeting
and
keep
the
time
here
and
see
see
how
it
goes.
Yeah.
A
B
A
Think
the
iron
Center
yeah
yeah,
so
it's
what's
the
bread
who
was
it
now?
We
want.
B
B
That
never
be
been.
No,
then
sorry,
yeah.
B
A
B
I
think
I
think
the
idea
of
it
may
be
interested
in
more
people
from
his
team.
Joining
yeah
I
can
also
think
with
him.
Ask
him
directly
I
mean
if,
if
he
thinks
that
you
know
to
approach,
three
folks
would
join
if
we
move
the
meeting
or
if
you
do
yeah,
yeah
or.
A
Maybe
set
up
a
dedicated,
maybe
half
an
hour
meeting
with
those
people
and
and
someone
from
the
rest
of
the
groups
would
say
so
at
least
get
the
the
what
we
call
it
the
overhearing
or
they
think
somehow.
A
B
A
B
Okay,
so
I
I've
put
in
the
agenda
some
updates
that
I've
done
on
my
PR
but
yeah
so
I
guess
we
don't
have
enough
corn
to
go
through.
A
B
B
I
try
to
address
comments,
also
like
on
the
spec
document
or
the
co-documented
Matthias
was
not
happy
with
the
way
the
list
of
failed
was
centralized,
so
I
updated
that
and
yeah
so
I
was
thinking,
maybe
to
move
the
schemas
out
to
different
PR,
also
to
make
it
appear
smaller
and
easier
to
review
and
then
I
started.
Introducing
a
mention
of
like
City
Event
binary
nodes.
I
will
be
all
in
headers.
A
B
B
Yeah
I
need
to
still
add
more
examples.
I
remember
that
so
let's
can
also
be
done
here
as
a
group
here,
but
or
you
can
do
it
if
you
prefer,
and
then
I
mean
if
here,
okay
generally,
okay
with
the
format
that
is
in
core
MD
and
next
I
would
also
do
the
same
kind
of
re-render
of
the
dogs,
but
for
the
other
part
of
the
vocabulary,
yeah.
B
Yeah,
so
the
other
thing
I
wanted
to
bring
up
was
the
discussion
that
you,
yeah
I,
think
you
mentioned
with
the
aligning
with
the
with
the
c
interoperability,
which
I
think
is
very
important,
and
probably
one
of
the
things
that
we
should
focus
a
lot.
Yes.
B
Yeah
so
I
put
the
link
in
the
issue.
There
I
mean
we.
We
have
some
terminology
for
like
at
the
interpretability
working
group
in
terms
of
like
pipeline
stages
and
steps,
we
have
our
pipeline
run
and
task
runs
yeah,
which
is
not
aligned.
So
it's
not
good
and
we
might
have
other
things
which
are
not
aligned
in
other
parts
of
the
dictionary.
B
Only
thing
I'm
a
bit
concerned
is
that
they
they
say
that
the
probability
working
group,
that
current
list
of
name
is
not
really.
B
B
And
to
give
the
keys
to
my
wife
just
a
second
yeah
after
the
current
list
is
not
really
like
fully
implemented.
It's
just.
B
Maybe
you
need
to
I
can
try
to
Circle
back
with
with
with
the
team
there
and
to
get
a
better
feeling.
What
is
the.
B
What
is
the
amount
of
change
that
they
expect
before
we
start
implementing
it?
Because
I
don't
want
also
to
make
too
much
earn
in
our
implementation,
because
we
need
to
update
the
pocs.
We
need
to
take
the
all
the
dogs
and
everything
and
I
don't
want
to
do
that
three
times.
Yeah.
A
So
I
I
remember
that
one
one
intention
with
the
the
alignment
that
we're
creating
this
vocabulary
document
at
all
I
mean
was
of
course
getting
all
different
terms
into
one
document
and
and
comparing
them
trying
to
group
them
in
in
the
same
columns
so
to
say,
and
then
there
was
an
intention
to
to
have
a
separate
summary
line
in
the
end
of
each
touch
table
stating
what
what
would
be
the
common
denominator
for
each
of
them.
But
we
never
came
to
that.
A
The
discussion
really
to
this
discuss
and
decide
on
what
do
we
think
is
the
best
term
to
use
for
this
different
parts
of
a
pipeliner
work.
So
I
don't
know
what
we
call
it,
but
then
they,
the
follow-up
thing
coming
from
yeah
yeah
there.
She
just
started
to
use
some
of
the
terms
as
if
they
were
the
common
denominators,
so,
for
example,
Pipeline
and
stage
and
step,
even
though
we
haven't
really,
we
hadn't
before
that
at
least
decided
on
anything
I
think
she
has
a
disclaimer
somewhere,
yeah
yeah,
not
really.
A
I
I
guess
the
reason
for
my
comment.
The
ticket
might
even
be
that
we
should
maybe
go
to
the
interoperability
group
and
try
to
to
see
what
is
than
the
recommended
name.
Should
we
go
for
this,
then
that
is
now
stated
or
should
we
go
for
something
else
and,
as
you
said,
it's
not
really
there's
some
consensus
on
what
things
should
be
called,
and
maybe
it's
it's
hard
to
make
such
decisions
on
the
interoperability
group
meeting
itself.
B
Yeah
I
think
it's
not
ideal,
but
also
0.1
is
it's
like
an
alpha
if
you
want
to
use
that
kind
of
terminology,
so
it's
yeah.
A
A
B
Yeah
I
thought
because
of
this
I
mean
if
we
go
in
the
way
of
like
asking
communities,
making
some
kind
of
not
Pole
or
something
like
that
which
names
to
use
and
that
that's
going
to
take
months.
Probably.
A
B
B
B
A
We
we
don't,
we
don't
prioritize
to
align,
it
forces
0.1
the
release
version
or
maybe,
but
people
should
be
aware
that
those
terms
could
change
the
names
of
the
events
could
change.
It
could
change
yeah
and
properties.
B
Okay,
and
maybe
what
I
can
also
do,
or
we
can
do
it,
error
and
reach
out
joinedown,
interrupt
working,
sick.
B
Or
defining
the
name
yep
so
to
see
if
this
is,
this
is
an
activity
that
it's
planned
for.
If
so,
how
is
going
to
happen
if
it's
not
planned
for
if
you'd
like
to
plan
it,
if
you
need
help
planning
it
and
yeah
I
mean
if
it's
not
moving
forward
from
a
side,
maybe
it's
something
that
we
can
try
and
help
and
drive
as
well.
B
A
A
I
also,
then,
added
this
to
our
release
project,
one
Milestone,
but
I'm,
not
sure
if
it
based
on
the
discussion
we
have
had
now.
If
we
should
keep
it
there,
if
we
should
move
it
away
again
related
to
the
milestone.
Maybe
we
should
done.
B
I
think
what
we
can
do
on
that
issue
to
add
the
comments
from
the
discussion
for
what
you
proposed
today.
I
say
that
that
part
at
least
must
be
in
zero,
one
or
documented,
which
is
the
intention
and
the
plan,
and
then
we
can
decouple
it
from
the
release.
I
mean
if
you
can,
if
it
is
possible
to
get
it
in,
that's
even
better.
Of
course,.
A
B
A
A
A
A
So
I
one
thing
is
that
I
remain
renamed
the
actual
projects
to
be
not
really
specific
to
the
series
boundaries,
but
although
the
releases,
so
the
project
itself
is
a
series
releases.
So
now
we
have
different
milestones
for
the
different
releases
inside
okay
sure
sounds
good,
so
we
get
I
guess.
Then
we
put
everything
under
all.
Otherwise
it
was
a
bit
strange
to
put
tickets
under
all
which
were
not
connected
to
the
other
one,
as
the
project
was
completely
gone
anyway.
A
A
Now,
two
weeks
ago,
okay,
yeah,
that's
right.
A
That
was
the
thing
that
was
brought
up
on
the
sign
meeting,
so
we
we
prepare
some
marketing
material
and
not
just
the
release,
notes
in
the
for
itself
for
it
and
then
the
governance
there,
I
I
wrote
it
as
we
should
plan
for
proper
governance,
but
not
actually
introduce
the
proper
governance.
Yet
that
should
be
a
separate,
let's
not
be
related
to
the
serious
one,
but
that
is
my
really
serious,
but
we
should
have
a
statement
saying
how
we
intend
to
govern
this.
A
Okay
and
the
short
intro
video
was
something
the
the
idea
that
was
to
to
take
something
from
more
or
less
what
you
and
Eric
are
often
presenting
in
different
forests
and
maybe
shorten
it
down
to
something
even
smaller,
so
so
that
we
don't
need
to
redo
that
presentation
live
from
time
to
time.
Instead,
we
can
have
a
short
intro
video,
that's
quick
to
look
at.
B
A
That
might
be,
if
I'm,
not
sure,
if
we
added
anything
else
to
the
project,
yeah
I
did
the
job
SDK.
Yes,
as
that
is
in
progress
and
I,
discussed
it
with
jalander
offline,
but
he
thinks
it's.
It
could
be
part
of
the
0.1
version.
He
thinks
it's,
it's
mature
enough
for
it
possible
to
to
provide
it
to
zero
to
one
time
frame.
So
therefore,
I
think
it
could
be
there.
B
Yeah
yeah,
absolutely
yeah
I
know
he
has
done
some
work
there,
so
yeah.
If,
if
he
thinks
it's
fine,
yeah
I
mean,
if
you
get
to
to
the
point
where
we
are
ready
to
release
and
yes,
like
okay,
we
are
only
missing
the
Java
SDK
and
calendar,
says
yeah.
B
A
Was
it
Google
that
was
also
asking
for
a
Java
API
or
was
it
it
was
python?
I
was
playing.
Maybe
it
was
the
Apple
person,
then
or
I
think
someone
talked
about
that
they
wanted
your
API
as
well.
Okay,
I
want
to
remember
now
who
it
was
well.
Of
course,
Jenkins
uses
Star
Wars,
like
I,
said
the
Jenkins
plugin.
B
A
A
Is
working
on
as
well,
which
I
didn't
add
yet
to
the
river
concept
here:
I'm,
not
sure
how
we
should
do
with
those
things
that
might
be
part
of
Zero's
one,
but
we
don't
know
yet
really
should
we
add
them
anyway,
I
think
or.
B
B
So
so
I
would
like
to
to
have
in
here
things
that
we
we
want
to
ask
that
we
consider
like
blocking
two
zero
one
so
like
this
is
the
minimum
scope
that
we
must
have.
If
you
want
to
do,
0.1,
yeah,
okay
and
then,
if
we
have
more
I
mean
I,
don't
know
how
we
can
we
can.
B
We
can
Mark
other
items
like
in
terms
of
Interest
or
priority,
especially
for
things
like
I
mean
the
the
Java
SDK
and
the
Spinnaker
PLC
I
mean
it's
mostly
one
person
working
on
those
and
the
same
person
is
not
working
on
other
part.
So
it's
it's
fine.
It
can
run
in
parallel
and
there's
no
like.
We
don't
have
to
decide
either.
We
do
this
or
we
do
that.
A
Yeah
but
of
course,
things
can
be
put
out
of
the
the
release
as
well
as
we
go
forward
if
we
see
that
they,
for
some
reason
can
make
it
or
don't
or
not
anymore
required,
so
that
the
job
SDK,
for
example.
If
we
don't
think
that
can
get
complete
enough,
then
of
course
we
can
kick
it
out,
but
it's
good.
Maybe
there's
any
way
to
show
that
we
intent
out
foreign.
B
B
And
what
else
yeah
support
for
links
here?
I
was
I
think
it
would
be
nice
to
start
prototyping
the
specification
for
this.
B
Yeah,
so
I
was
going
to
ask
if
anyone
wants
to
just
not
working
and
that,
if
not
once
I'm
done
with
the
other
PRS
I
can
I
can
start
working
again.
Yeah.
A
But
and
then
considering
my
my
availability,
I'm
not
sure
I
can
manage
to,
but
that's
something
that
I
might
be
able
to
do.
B
B
Way
we
can
work
that
I've
been
I've,
been
wondering
whether
PR's
on
against
markdown
or
a
good
way
to
work.
Another
way
we
could
work
is
like
in
our
candy
and
like
work
collaboratively
on
on.
A
B
Yeah
once
it's
really
just
footage
in
a
PR
and
merge,
it
sure
yeah.
So
if
you
think,
if
you
feel
like
okay,
you
would
like
definitely
to
and
to
work
on
this
you're
interested,
but
maybe
not
to
do
the
whole
work
or
you
want
to
start
giving
a
direction
for
it.
Maybe
you
need
some
help.
Maybe
having
like
a
markdown
document,
makes
it
easier
to
collaborate.
B
Okay,
yeah:
let's
hear
what
the
other
thing
about
this
as
well,
but
okay,
okay,
yeah,
so
I.
Think
as
the
case
I
put
the
question
mark,
there
was
any
update
on
the
python
SDK
because
I
know
Eric
mentioned
something,
but
it's
not
here.
So
maybe
we
can
put
come
in
here
for
the
child.
One.
B
B
Basically,
the
the
main
comment
from
my
side
on
that
was
I
would
still
like
to
to
have
like
the
previous
POC,
so
either
to
add
some
Flags
to
the
script,
so
that
is
still
possible
to
like
the
existing
POC
or
the
PC
Plus
button
occur,
or
to
make
two
different,
folders
I
think
jalander
added
a
flag,
so
I
just
wanted
to
try
it
out.
A
And
that's
still
in
the
City
events
report.
That's
another
thing!
Actually
that
I
I
was
tester
struck
me
when
I
thought
about
the
release
there.
Maybe
it's
not
mandatory
or
a
requirement,
but
it
would
actually
be
very
good
to
have
everything
interesting
for
the
spec
moved
from
the
Sega
events
report.
Spectrum.
B
B
A
I'm
not
sure
if,
if
it's
possible
to
move
discussions
from
one
organization
to
another-
one
probably
not,
but
if
we
should
continue
with
discussions,
we
should
have
them
in
the
Spectrum.
But
I
guess.
Instead.
A
B
Yeah
I
think
that
one
he
did
then
on
the
CD
event
side
as
well.
So
I
think
it
should
be
safe
to
close
that
one,
but
I
need
to
just
wanted
to
double
check
with
him.
A
A
A
B
A
But
when
discussing,
for
example,
proof
of
Concepts
in
an
issue
that
doesn't
really
fit
in
the
spec
repo,
we
should
probably
assume
have
a
I,
don't
know
Community
rep
or
something
more
overall
Ripple
administrative
report
for
the
students
where
we
can
discuss
such
things.
Unless
we
have
animals
proper
discussions
here,.
B
B
I
don't
know
it
feels
like
something
that
should
be
on
CD,
then
site,
but
we
we
need
a
place
where
to
store
the
the
pocs
and
I
think
that's
this
discussion
before
and
a
member
was
a
conclusion,
but
whether
to
have
maybe
one
repo
per
POC
on
the
city
event
org
or
to
have
one
single
repo
for
all
pocs.
A
A
A
It
becomes
a
bit
cluttered,
I,
think,
okay,
but
at
the
same
time
I
think
we
can.
As
long
as
we
don't
have
a
new
governance
setup,
we
can
have
it
like
that
and
then
clean
it
up
when
the
new
governance
is
in
place,
because
then
we
might
have
another
structure
completely
or
yeah,
not
completely,
but
foreign.
B
Yeah,
okay,
yeah
well
yeah.
Maybe
it
makes
sense,
then,
to
create
the
reboot
of
what
moving
things
around
many
times.
The
good
thing
is
at
least
it's
once
in
the
same
art.
You
can
move
issues
around
yeah,
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
can
do
that
across
ours,
I,
don't
think
so.
A
B
B
All
right,
yeah
I
think
we
managed
to
spend
40
minutes
shutting.
B
That's
good
and
yes,
okay,
anything
else.
You
would
like
to
bring.
A
I
think
we
talked
about
this
yeah
we
already
talked
in
the
beginning
about
when
we
should
have
meetings
but
they've.
A
I
think
Eric
is
working
all
summer
and
I
think
Elgar
Andre
was
on
the
last
meeting
and
he
is
also
working
and
and
now
materials
might
not
join
due
to
other
parent
but
and
I.
Think
you
yeah.
A
A
They
won't
probably
attend
any
meetings,
so
I
think
I
I
intend
to
to
have
the
same
meeting
anyway
to
at
least
join
and
see
if
anyone
else
joins,
but
that
will
be
in
my
last
meeting
before
my
vacation,
then
I
think,
except
for
intro
or
supply
chain
meetings
that
week
Thursday
meeting.
A
A
A
B
Did
as
otherwise
to
you
and
then
next
next
week
in
the
meeting.