►
From YouTube: SIG CDEvents Meeting - July 26, 2022
Description
For more Continuous Delivery Foundation content, check out our blog: https://cd.foundation/blog/
B
A
Yeah
yeah
yeah
here
in
the
in
the
room
at
least
we
have
air
conditioning
the
hotel
room.
So
we
are
I'm
here
for
a
music
workshop
for
our
son
and
he's
going
to
all
the
activities,
and
so
but
they
don't
have
air
conditioning
in
many
rooms
in
the
auditorium,
so
they're,
really
it's
quite
hot
for
them.
But
yeah
the
hotel
room
is
not
nice.
B
A
It's
okay,
although
actually
I
I
really
like
the
heat
so
I'll
often
turn
it
off
in
the.
B
Rooms,
I'm
in
using
like
the
vents
and
and
kind
of
crack
a
window,
sometimes.
A
A
So
it's
quite
fast
should
we
get
started
as
usual
will
be
free
to
write
to
participants
list.
So
I
only
had
a
couple
of
things
for
today.
I
wanted
to
review
a
little
bit
the
events
that
we're
going
to
use
for
the
metrics
poc.
A
A
And
mathias
suggested,
maybe
we
don't
need
to
use,
build
events
with
this
poc.
We
can
just
narrow
it
down
to
just
use
artifact
events
so
yeah
just
basically
to
summarize,
we
would
need
to
have
a
change
event
for
every
time
there
is
a
change
merged.
We
have
noted
a
model
at
the
moment
for
those
events,
so
I
would
have.
I
would
make
a
pr
to
add
it.
A
B
A
And
then
okay,
and
then
I
would
extend
the
artifact
event
to
include
the
repository.
The
search
repository
so
now
make
the
assumption
that
there
is
this
one
main
repository
associated
to
an
artifact,
and
so
I
have
like
source
repository
in
the
last
shot
for
that
artifact
yeah,
and
that
would
basically
allow
us
to
link
the
change
event
which
include
the
show
and
the
source
repo
to
the
to
the
artifact.
A
Would
it
make
sense,
since
we
will
have
a
large
number
of
artifacts
that
will
be
associated
with
one
repository
to
have
two
fills
like
a
repo
filled
and
the
repos
fills
maybe
making
it
more
confusing
from
on
the
receiving
side?
Yeah.
B
There's
gonna
be
a
lot
of
these
like
balancing
questions
somehow
making
it
easy
for
the
majority
of
the
cases
is
good.
Making
it
possible
for
the
more
advanced
cases
is
also
good,
but
then
the
balancing
question
becomes.
Do
we
just
use
the
more
advanced
case
to
cover
everything,
and
I
think
if
we
do
that
too
much
then
we
may
have.
A
Yeah
yeah,
I
agree
with
your
generic.
It's
a
difficult
balancing,
dart.
A
A
Yes,
all
right
I'll
make
a
proposal
for
this
then,
and
the
third
type
of
events
would
be
kind
of
incident
events,
so
instead
it
started
an
incident.
A
Resolved
and
there
could
be
other
events
associated
to
it.
Like
I
didn't
say,
it
could
be
solved
in
many
ways
during
a
rollback
or
just
by
some
external
dependency
that
was
fixed,
so
these
events
could
be
sent
manually.
It
could
be
sent
by
some
platform,
but
I
think
these
are
the
the
main
events-
and
I
was
thinking
for
this-
to
propose
a
new,
a
new
stage
to
start
a
new
stage
and
the
list
of
stages
outside
of
the
forward.
A
We
have
now
also
because
I
think
we
we
have
this
question
many
times
whether
this
is
the
the
scope.
What
we
have
now
is
the
scope
of
city
lands
or
not,
or
we
consider
more,
and
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
to
have
a
fifth
stage
in
there,
where
we
clearly
say
that
we
want
to
cover
events
from
after
the
deployment
to
make
it
clear
that
it's
in
scope
for
city
events
and
then,
depending
on.
A
How
it
goes
with
captain,
if
you
decide
to
take
some
of
the
events
from
captain
or
not,
but
at
least
we
have
a
starting
point
in
there
and
we
can
again
propose
just
very
simple
two
events.
Events
incident
created
incident
results
with
some
information
about
the
environment.
A
B
A
A
Okay,
cool
yeah
I'll
try
to
to
work
in
this
this
week,
so
we
we
have
all
the
required
events,
at
least
in
pr's,
until
the
next
meeting
and
yeah.
Hopefully
we
can
start
building
a
plc
with
those.
B
Yeah,
please
feel
free
to
ping
me
whenever
you,
you
have
a
pr
that
needs
to
be
looked
at.
I
don't
always
catch
or
I
get
a
stronger
warning
from
slack
if
there's
a
direct
message
than
I
get
from
a
post
in
the
city
events
channel.
So
if
you
feel
that
I'm
not
responding
just
ping
me
in
the
as
a
direct
message.
B
A
All
right,
the
only
other
thing
I
have
for
today
I
created
a
small
pr
about
the
binary
mode.
B
A
A
So
they
have
this
concept
of
structure
versus
binary
there
in
different
bindings,
which
is
good
because
it
means
that
if
we
say
we
use
cloud
events
binary
mode
for
the
cd
event
binary
mode,
that
doesn't
mean
that
we
are
restricting
to
http.
We
still
can
bind
them
on
top
of
multiple
different
protocols.
A
A
A
A
A
So
the
only
thing
that
I
think
it's
worth
putting
in
the
hp
headers
would
be
whatever
we
have
in
the
content
for
the
specific
subject
and
my
proposal
there
was
to
have
city
events
subject
and
task,
so
the
event
subject
url
for
those
two
and
then
where
we
have
something
more
than
a
field.
So
like
a
structure
like
the
pipeline
run
to
use
the
semicolon
separated
list
that
is,
can
be
used
in
http
editors
like
cd
event,
subject
pipeline
run,
then
id
equals
something
semicolon
space
or
sql.
A
Something
else,
and
I
think,
with
this
structure,
we
we
would
have
version
id
timestamp,
subject:
tags
subject:
urls
http
headers,
which
can
be
all
used
for
filtering
routing
and
like
more
inner
type
of
fills,
then
could
put
that
as
this
more
composite
format
and
yeah.
Sorry,
the
rendering
is
not
ideal,
I'm
not
sure
which.
B
One
question
there:
if
at
any
point
we
need
to
have
a
third
level
like
pipeline
run,
would
contain
something
that
is
actually
an
object
and
not
just
a
key
value
pair.
Then
we
would
run
into
problems,
I
guess,
or
how
would
we
solve
that.
A
Yes,
so
we
would
run
into
problems,
but
at
first
I
think
we
could
try
to
steer
away
from
that
unless
it's
very
needed
try
to
try
to
get
this
not
too
too
complex
yeah.
The
second
thing
is,
I
was
thinking
for.
If
you
have
very
deep
things,
we
could
either
base64
encode
them
and
add
them
into
one
header
or
have
one
string
with
serialized
json
in
it,
and
the
last
thing
we
could
say
we
only
support
limited
amount
of
information
in
this
format.
B
B
I
guess,
if
we
basically
for
it
somehow
we
would
need
to
tell
the
receiver
that
or
we
should.
We
tell
the
receiver,
that
okay
now
you
actually
get
base64
encoded
data
and
not
just
a
key
value
pairing
or
I'm
not
sure.
If
you
do
that
by
like
adding
another
suffix
to
the
key
or
I
don't
know
how
to
do
it,
but
we
can
come
up
with
something
would
be
neat.
B
And
if
it's
that
deep,
then
I
guess
those
you
wouldn't
use
something
that
deep
for
routing
the
event
anyway.
I
guess.
B
A
Mode,
you
can
have
anything
in
the
payload,
so
it
can
be
it's
something
that
you
don't
you
don't
know
what
it
is.
I
mean
it's
apart
from
the
I
mean
you
have
a
content
type
that
tells
you
what
it
is,
but
it
could
be
anything
including
a
binary.
It
could
be
anything
and
everything
else
you
put
into
the
headers
but
yeah.
I
was
also
wondering
about
about
it.
B
I
mean
there
are
benefits,
of
course,
of
because
I
just
did
a
quick,
google
and
it
seems
like
cloud
events
are
the
only
ones
that
call
this
binary
mode,
or
this
one
is
search
for
like
http
binary
mode,
then
cloud
events
is
the
first
hit,
so
so
it
may
be
something
that
they
came
up
with
something
or
in
some
sense
I
mean
it
would
be
a
way
to
send
cloud
events
data
if
the
content
is
binary
mode
like
because
then
obviously
you
can't
add
json
to
it,
but
I'm
still
yeah,
I'm
not
convinced
that
binary
mode
is
the
best.
B
A
All
right,
I
hope
I
kept
everything
yep
but
yeah
thanks.
That's
all
the
feedback.
A
All
right,
yeah
that
that's
really
all
I
had
for
today
as
anything.
B
B
B
One
thing
it's
more
of
a
general
thing,
so
we
now
have
two
cd
events
meetings,
one
wednesday
lunch
european
time
and
one
tuesday
afternoon,
you're
being
time
since
they
are
one
week
apart.
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
sort
of
allow
progress
to
happen
between
the
meetings.
So
it's
not
like
it's
the
same
meeting
for
europe
and
asia
and
europe
and
the
americas.
B
Okay,
maybe
something
like
like
if
there
are
people
in
attendance
who
weren't
part
of
the
last
meeting,
we
start
with
a
recap
of
some
sort.
I
don't
know
or
advise
people
to
read
up
ahead
of
time
on
the
meeting
notes
and
come
with
input,
some
some
kind
of
solution
for
making
sure
that
people
don't
feel
left
out
if
they
can
only
attend
one
of
the
meetings.
B
We
had
a
similar
setup
when
I
was
working
at
ericsson,
but
then
we
actually
had
both
meetings
on
the
same
day,
so
it
was
just
the
exact
same
agenda
but
for
two
different
user
groups
and
that's
not
what
we
want
here.
I
think
I
think
it's
good
that
they
are
are
on
alternating
weeks,
because
that
that
helps
us
make
more
things
happen.
A
Thanks
moving
forward
yeah,
I
think
the
the
recap
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting
sounds
like
a
good
idea
to
me.
We
could
do
a
quick
and
quick
recap.
I
mean
we
can
also.
B
B
A
A
That's
a
good
question
because
they
used
to
be
in
the
like,
wrote,
zoom
account
and
roxanne
used
to
upload
them,
but
now
we
have
a
cd
events,
only
zoom
account.
A
So
I
don't
know
if
roksan
is
still
uploading
them.
I
need
to
check
yeah
it's
it's
a
manual
process,
though
so
I
mean
we
would
really
just
need
to
make
sure
that
wherever
whoever
takes
care
of
that,
does
it
before
in
time
before
the
the
next
meeting
are
possibly
in
shock.
I.
A
A
One
thing
that
I
did
protect
on
is
to
set
up
to
use
this
up
here
to
set
up
some
automation,
so
I
I
could
check
if
something
we
could
do
for
city
events
as
well
protecting
what
we
do
there.
We
just
upload
the
recordings
into
google
drive
and
we
don't
have
like
a
project
google
drive,
but
we
there
might
be
some
automation
to
put
it
into
youtube
directly
or
something.
So
I
can.
B
A
Right
yeah,
but
we
don't
have
another
space
where
we
could
put
it.
A
People
can
watch
it
yeah.
A
This,
I
think,
before.
A
A
Yeah
for
this
time
I
don't
know-
maybe
you
can
look-
do
a
quick
recap
for
from
last
meeting
just
so
last
week
we
had
some
updates
from
the
python
sdk.
So
first
goal
is
one
to
one
party
with
go
sdk
and
the
ball
from
there.
It's
currently
running
in
a
torque
and
it's
actually
under
development
and
hopefully
getting
into
the
main
reaper
soon
the
speedmaker
pse
was
merged
and
updated.
A
A
A
Once
we
had
some
discussion
about
build
events,
whether
we
need
the
commit
shy
and
the
repoint
there
or
not
with
different
opinions,
but
at
the
end
matthias
made
a
point
that
we
really
need
build
events
for
for
this
matrix
poc
and
the
answer
was
probably
not-
and
indeed
we
don't
necessarily
need
them.
So
we'll
kind
of
park
the
discussion
for
now
and
see
the
events
content
mod.
We
didn't
really
get
to
it.
So
I
had
some
ideas
in
here,
but
we
didn't
really
get
to
discuss
it.
A
Community
repo,
I
plan
to
create
a
community
rival
for
city
events
over
the
summer
at
some
point,
and
I
also
created
a
proposal
for
a
visualization
tool,
city
events.
So
we
got
the
link
here.