►
From YouTube: CDF - SIG Events Meeting - 2021.10.11
Description
For more Continuous Delivery Foundation content, check out our blog: https://cd.foundation/blog/
A
B
Yeah,
hello,
how
are
you
I'm
I'm
from
new
zealand?
I
I'm
at
cubecon,
so
I
yeah
I've
got
some
time
to
come
to
the
event.
A
A
A
So
I
heard
from
andrea
that
he
will
not
join.
He
had
some
conflicting
meeting.
B
I
think
steve
tyler
is
coming.
B
Yeah
he
mentioned
in
a
chat
that
he
should
be
coming
as
well.
B
It
start:
oh
there's
a
tuesday
yeah.
It
starts
maybe
in
24
hours,
but
there's
some
pre-events
going
on
at
the
moment
as
well.
A
A
Great,
so
it's
four
minutes
past
I
guess
we
can
get
started.
Then
I
made
some
effort
to
update
the
agenda
for
today
just
earlier
today.
So
let's
go
through
it.
You
want
me
to
share
my
screen,
or
do
you
see
the
agenda
yourselves.
A
A
I
have
no
real
updates
from
cdf
fancy
events
or
sigi
episodes,
but
the
series
yeah,
the
events
is
us,
but
anyway,
don't
really
know
what
to
put
on
this
water.
Today
we
should
probably
add
some
vocabulary
inputs
from
the
work
stream
vocabulary.
Workstream.
A
A
Maybe
I
should
say
as
well
andre
I
couldn't
join
today
for
those
of
you
who
missed
that
in
the
beginning
he
was
busy
with
other
things
so,
and
I
have
not
gotten
reply
from
him
on
my
chat
with
him
on
the
actual
buying
of
the
domain
name.
So
there's
no
more
input
there.
E
I
did
I
put
in
the
chat
just
now.
The
I
think.
That's
the
right
document
I
mean
make
sure
and
just
yeah
yeah,
so
there
so
there's
a
there's,
a
doc
that
the
the
linux
foundation
needs
for
understanding
kind
of
the
create
it's
a
creative
brief
for
our
cd
events.
I
I
did
some
work
on
it.
So
it's
out
there
if
you
want
to
add
your
thoughts.
A
A
I
just
first
before
we
come
there,
we
will
just
we
hash
that
we
have
already
the
cd
events
organization
in
github
registered.
We
did
that.
Last
time
we
haven't.
I
haven't
done
anything
actually
on
that
since
then,
at
all,
so
it's
still
empty.
A
A
We
said
that
the
in
the
event
type,
it
should
be
the
reverse
dns,
which
is
the
series
of
events
if
we
would
get
events.cds
domain
name,
and
I
know
that
steve
brought
this
up
together
with
andrea
on
the
project
proposal.
I
think
that
was
quite
positively
accepted
or
not
accepted
yet,
but
conceived
so.
A
That
will
probably
happen
when
we
propose
the
project.
We
guess
our
taste,
and
it
was
also
discussed
about
this
creative
artists,
which
tracy
has
mentioned
as
well.
So
I
guess
it
will
come
that
for
the
creative
brief
as
to
mention
tracy,
so
I
think
andrea
put
this
document
up
and
put
some
in
introductory
information
in
it.
A
A
A
So
guys
we
are
supposed
to
like
provide
whatever
input.
This
could
be
useful
for
the
creative
team
to
make
a
good
logo
out
of
this.
So
there
are
a
lot
of
buzzwords
and
then
magnetic
idea.
A
I'm
not
sure
if
all
of
this
is
actually
written
by
andrea
by
heart
or
if
some
of
this
come
from
somewhere
else,
I'm
not
sure,
but
of
course,
the
introduction
to
each
other
sections
come
from
the
template,
sometimes
some
kind
of
hook
that
exists.
I
would
guess
I
wasn't
actually
involved
in
creating
this
document
from
the
beginning.
So
I
can't
really
say
if
all
of
this
is
from
andrea
or
I
guess
it
might
be,.
E
A
So
that
could
be
maybe
used
for
basing
the
long
one,
but
of
course
anything
else
could
be
as
well
and
then
we
had
the
the
information
the
note
from
tracy
as
well
on
evie.
In
the
end,
it's
just
a
very,
very
good
note
as
well.
E
Yeah,
I
I
would
suggest,
if
you
have
any
thoughts
put
it
in
there,
because
they're
just
trying
to
we
got
to
catch
them
up
on
everything
we've
spoken
about,
so
even
though
have
they
have
their
own
little
categories.
If
you
just
you
know,
add
whatever
comes
up
to
mind,
the
more
we
can
put
in
there.
The.
A
I
don't
know
we
should
go
about
this
if
everyone
should
just
write
whatever
they
feel
in
this
document
or
if
you
should
kind
of
review
it
before,
we
actually
send
it
to
them,
and
I
haven't
even
heard
either
if
it's
some
kind
of
deadline
for
this,
or
maybe
it's
up
to
us
as
soon
as
we're,
what
is
done
with
this,
they
can
start
their
works,
but
I
guess
we
will
continue
that
discussion
on
slack.
I
guess
most
of
you
saw
the
the
post
from
andrea
stone.
A
A
So
keravans
uses
clouds
and
we
stated
here
that
we
should
not
be
limited
to
the
cloud
native.
So
but
of
course,
in
some
sense
it
would
be
maybe
nice
to
have
like
how
to
events
partners
as
a
part
of
our
logo,
whatever
that
could
be
one
idea.
A
C
A
E
A
Okay,
going
on
then
we
also
talked
last
time
about
twitter
account
and
andrea
was
supposed
to
register
twitter
account,
and
I
checked
with
him
today
on
that
as
well,
and
it's
not
done
but
he's
working
on
it.
So
apparently
it's
ongoing
we'll
keep
the
action
until
next
time.
Then
then
I
also
realized
that,
of
course,
we
need
to
update
our
readme
file
in
the
sig
github
with
links
to
these
things.
A
A
D
On
moving
things
over
to
the
organization.
A
You
mean
to
the
yeah
to
the
github
organization
from
our
sig.
No,
we
haven't
discussed
that.
D
And
then
we
did
do
a
couple
of
discussions
around
kind
of
like
what
names
we
should
have
for
the
different
repos.
But
did
we
have
any
conclusion
there.
D
One
for
the
spec
as
in
cloud
events
and
then
one
for
we
talked
about
having
a
like
an
experimental
repository
for
the
poc,
and
then
there
might
be
other
repositories
coming
in.
A
A
D
Discuss
some
things
on
the
previous
vocabulary
meeting
I
put
the.
A
A
A
Well,
I
guess
there's
not
nothing
stopping
us
from
doing
it
by
the
way
we
should
have
a
name,
of
course,
of
the
repositories.
So
sorry,
the
projects,
apart
from
that
there
is
nothing
stopping
us
from
doing
it
now.
I
guess
if
someone
has
the
time
and
volunteers
to
do
it,
they
discuss
more
about
that
in
the
vocabulary
meeting
that
it's
smallest
urgent
or
something
like
that
to
do
it
an
hour.
D
We
talked
about
the
spec
and
one
rip
of
sdk,
probably
one
ripper
for
the
website,
where
steve
talked
about
hugo
and
doxie
as
you
have
for
telus,
and
I
think.
A
Yes,
but
of
course
we
could
start
with
moving
the
spec.
Maybe.
A
A
A
C
D
B
D
Yeah,
that's
the
same.
That's
also
taken
from
clarence.
D
Yeah
so
I
pasted
an
example
to
how
cloud
events
sdk
go
is
named
and
chat,
and
if
you
go
to
the
spec
and
scroll
down
on
the
readme,
you
can
see
the
other
sdks.
A
C
A
E
E
C
A
A
A
D
Yeah
shruti
was.
D
So
basically
yeah
yeah
a
little
bit
of
short
interaction.
You
have
the
you
have
the
notes,
but
we
discussed
a
little
bit
around
the
names
and
so
on.
We
talked
about,
as
I
said,
about
the
website.
D
D
We
talked
about
the
park.
Currently,
we
have
some
things
about.
The
park
is
outside
of
it.
Mauricio
has
in
his
repository
and
techno
cd
has
some
parts
there,
and
that
was
the
idea
about
the
experimental
repo.
D
I
pointed
out
that
cloud
events
has
a
primer
document
inspector
repo,
which
talks
about
a
little
bit
about
the
design,
decisions
behind
and
and
some
information,
but
rationale
behind
cloud
events
is
not
part
of
the
specification.
So
if
you're
interested
in
in
this
budget,
you
can
go
check
it
out
there.
D
So
maybe
we
should
have
something
of
of
of
that
in
our
also,
then
we
talked
about
jenkins,
we're
expanding
and
talking
about
expanding
the
pocket.
Shorty
has
been
creating
this
cloud
events
plugin
for
jenkins,
and
we
talked
a
little
bit
on
on
how
to
expand
that
one
using
our
events
or
bringing
that
up
on
in
the
actually,
and
so
we
talked
about
the
events
that
it's
sending
and
how
it
maps
to
us.
D
As
you
see
there,
the
only
thing
we
didn't
actually
map-
and
we
had
this
new
job
created
deleted
events
that
we
were
a
little
bit
unaware
of
should
have
and
jenkins,
has
some
node
events
and
where
we
didn't
really
have
anything
exactly
the
same
yeah,
and
that
is
what
I
can't
remember.
It
says
plan
for
spy
plus
stage
events.
I
don't
remember
what
they
said
there.
D
D
Yeah
eric
has
has
on
the
wiki
here,
creating
if
you
click
on
the
ap
there
and
he
has
created
a
in
the
no.
We
should
review.
Add
recurring
agenda
items
to
review
the
ap
on
the
wiki.
D
D
A
A
A
Okay,
thanks
matthias
now
it
strikes
me
that
we
we
discuss
more
or
less
the
same
things
in
several
meetings
and
it's
maybe
a
bit
awkward
to
some
extent,
this
with
different
people
in
the
different
meetings.
We
should
try
to
clean
that
I
think
or
make
it
better
structured
structures.
We
know
what
to
discuss
in
what
meetings.
A
So
I
think
it's
valuable
if
the
vocabulary
meeting
could
focus
on
the
vocabulary
mostly
and
not
need
to
talk
too
much.
Of
course.
Now
it's
everything
is
new
when
it
comes
in
your
name
repository
and
such
things.
So
that's
quite
natural,
I
guess,
but
we
should
try
to
to
make
that
a
more.
A
A
But
anyway,
thanks
mathias
for
that
input,
anything
to
add
from
someone
that.
E
E
You
should
everybody
should
have
gotten
an
invite
and
you
should
already
be.
You
should
be
registered
for
kubecon,
I'm
assuming
car.
You
might
be
able
to
help
us
a
little
bit
more
on
this,
but
you
might
be
unclear
how
this
works,
because
I
didn't
see
like
a
zoom
invite
in
that
invite.
So
I
assume
we
just
have
to
show
up
to
the
booth.
F
Yes,
I
believe,
that's
what
happened
and
if
you
need
kubecon
tickets,
jackie
actually
has
some
extras
that
she
can
share
if
you're
working
at
the
booth.
You
know
if
you're
at
the
booth,
that's
so
if
you
need
to
then
ping
her
on
slack
and
then
I
believe
you
can
just
go
to
the
booth
at
that
point
and
sign
into
the
booth.
I
have
a
slightly
different
path
for
it,
so
I
I'm
not
sure
what
exactly
to
tell
you,
but
that's
usually
how
that
works.
F
And
then,
from
what
I
can
see
on
my
end,
your
slot
is
about
a
half
an
hour.
It's
quite
special
there's
only
there's,
apparently
only
six
slots
the
cdf
could
give
out
and
your
you
know,
event.
Seg
is
very
important,
so
you
have
one,
but
it
is,
is
some
sort
of
live
booth
so,
as
tracy
said,
you'll
be
able
to
interact
as
if
it
was
a
sig
meeting
or
do
a
demo
or
whatever
it
is
that
you
would
like
to
do
during
that
half
now.
E
E
Any
idea
how
that's
gonna
since
we've
not
done
this,
I
don't
I
don't
know
how
much
we
have
pushed
it.
I
was
going
to
start
pushing
it
on
wednesday
morning.
So
people
you
know
see
that
through
their
twitter
feeds,
but
I
really
don't
know
what
to
expect.
I
have
a.
I
have
one
today,
a
30
minute
just
meet
the
meet
the
general
board,
so
I
you
know,
I
don't
know
if
there'll
be
anybody
there.
Even
to
be
quite
honest,
especially
today
today
is
like
I
guess
the
booth's
open
today.
Apparently
they
do.
F
On
the
virtual
booths
and
apparently
there's
real
virtual
fatigue,
so
the
reported
thing
among
among
booths
at
different
conferences
is
that,
in
fact,
if
anything
traffic
is
decreasing
but
by
by
all
means,
like
you
know,
get
out
on
twitter
and
say
we're
going
to
have
this
conversation,
you
know
if
you
are
at
kubecon
virtually
or
come
join
us
we're
going
to
be
talking
about,
say
you
know,
cd
events
and
the
vocabulary
write
about
thing
whatever
it
is
also.
A
Know
yeah,
so
it's
los
angeles
time
area
yeah,
I
I
must
admit
or
admit,
but
I'm
not
registered
to
kubecon
myself
and
I
didn't
actually
plan
to
attend
kubecon
this
year,
except
for
being
on
this
booth.
If
I
was,
I
mean
somehow
needed,
I
think
it
would
of
course
be
good
to
be
there
on
the
booth,
but
then
I
also
realized
that
since
I'm
not
registered-
and
I
might
not
be
able
to
show
up
in
anything
else
than
this
booth-
maybe
I
shouldn't
take
a
ticket
just
for
that,
even
though
we
could
get
it.
A
E
Well,
the
I
don't
know.
A
E
I
don't
know
if
you
can
still
register
but
to
it's
free
if
you
want
to
if
you
register,
just
for
like
the
keynotes
and
the
and
the
and
the
virtual
booths,
but
cara
do
you
think
jackie
could
get
him
registered
today.
E
F
L.A
she's
at
coupon,
so
she
might
be
hard
to
get
hold
of.
But
if
you,
if
you
slacker,
I'm
sure
she'll
see
it
sooner
or
later,
and
so
definitely
do
definitely
do.
F
A
I
haven't
heard
of
anything
anyone
else.
It
sounds
like
you,
tracy
will
be
there
and
I
guess
cara
you
as
well
then
or.
A
Yeah,
of
course
yeah
so
so
would
I
do
we
know
avenue
miles
from
the
sig
mata.
Yes,
have
you.
E
So
there's
jackie's
email.
I
would
suggest
you
if
she's
got
some
spots,
go
ahead
and
grab
them.
A
E
Before
us
and
you
could-
and
at
the
worst
case
you
could
just
register
for
the
you
can
register
yourself
for
the
the
free
ticket
for
the
virtual
side.
A
Yeah,
if
someone
has
the
link
to
that,
you
can
add
it
to
the
minutes
later
as
well.
Otherwise,
we'll
find
it
unless
we
can
get
tickets
from
punjabi
good,
so
I
hope
I'll
meet
you
there,
then,
on
wednesday
at
least
anything
else
to
mention
about
kubecon.
A
E
C
D
A
D
C
A
Good
input,
let's
move
on
then
I
didn't
add
anything
for
blog
posts
or
presentations.
There
is
no
upcoming
presentation
that
I'm
aware
at
least
should
we
plan
for
some
presentation
to
us.
A
E
And
you
know
we're
we
should
always
keep
in
mind.
Let's
just
put
this
as
a
note.
In
there
there
is
a
cd
foundation
online
meetup,
I'm
not
going
to
be
running
it
next
year.
It'll
be
somebody
from
the
ambassador
program
is
going
to
take
it
over,
but
we
should
try
to
get
on
the
calendar
for
that
as
well.
E
I
don't
it's
not
for
the
rest
of
this
year.
Yes,
we're
not
going
to
do
one
in
december,
because
it's
really
slow.
We
have
november's
already
scheduled
and
then
the
ambassador
program
is
going
to
take
it
over.
As
of
january
1st,
I'm
not
sure
how
that's
going
to
get
those
how
that's
going
to
get
put
together,
but
we
should
just
keep
it
in
mind
and
gurima
bhajpai
would
be
somebody
that
we
could
reach
out
to
to
get
on
the
on
the
schedule.
E
They'll
announce
who's,
taking
that
over
I'm
assuming
in
the
next
month
or
so.
E
And
really
so
in
part,
part
of
that
cd
of
online
meetup,
I've
tried
and
I've
actually
got
had
some
success
with
it.
But
I've
really
focused
on
trying
to
do
topics
that
would
attract
the
the
end
user
community.
So
I've
had
a
lot
of
it.
I've
tried
to
bring
in
end
user
types
and
they
do
actually
really
great
presentations
by
the
way,
but
whatever
presentation
we
do,
it
should
be
to
start
getting
that
end
user,
community,
interested
and
potentially
involved
in
the
event
sig.
E
E
A
So,
let's
move
on
so
we
can
get
some
more
discussions
on
the
design
discussions.
We've
had
this
spdx
for
some
time
in
the
agenda,
but
never
came
to
it
in
previous
meetings,
so
I
don't
intend
to
do
much
with
it
right
now.
More
than
spread
these
links,
and
just
mention
that
I
don't
know
if
you
know,
but
the
sdx
has
become
a
video
materials
standard
nowadays.
A
So,
of
course
it's
not
maybe
well,
it
might
be
the
only
available
standard,
but
it's
maybe
not
the
only
way.
We
should
do
things,
but
since
it's
a
standard
I
think
we
should
actually
try
to
adhere
to
it.
At
least,
if
we
don't,
we
should
stay
twice
or
something
like
that.
A
So
exactly
what
the
next
steps
would
be
that
I
can't
really
say
now,
but
when
discussing
names
and
stuff
in
our
events,
I
would
say
that
we
should
look
into
this
specification
and
try
to
follow
whatever
has
come
up
there.
A
A
So
this
is
what
their
format
looks
like,
and
then
they
have
these
specified
keys
for
all
different
yeah
parameters
that
you
could
be
interested
in
in
the
bomb.
I
guess
it
would
be
interesting
for
for
you
in
our
theories
project,
I
guess
you're
quite
aware
of
it
as
well.
Yes,.
E
Yeah
steve's
been
really
looking
at
this
part
of
it,
so
this
it
does
make
it
an
interesting
anything
that,
because
we're
bringing
in
those
the
spdx
info
based
on
a
microservice
and
then
rolling
it
up
to
the
application
level.
So
you
have
an
application
bomb.
A
E
F
And-
and
this
is
not
exactly
related
to
cloud
events
per
se,
but
since
you're
asking
and
it's
it's
in
our
general
space,
considering
interoperability,
gareth
rushgrove
from
snake
actually
gave
a
really
good
talk
on
s-bombs
at
a
recent
uk
kubernetes
community
days
and
about
halfway
into
the
talk
he
started
discussing
how
one
of
the
ways
one
one
area
in
which
standardization
could
really
be
improved
for
s-bombs,
is
when
we
think
about
how
do
we
have
specs
for
how
we
describe
access
to
them
so
similar
to
how
for
containers
we
have
the
the
oci
distribution
specification
and
these
this
these
specs
will
help
they
answer
questions
around
like.
F
How
do
we
store
them?
How
do
we
keep
them
up
to
date?
How
do
we
know
what
the
lightest
versions
are
things
like
that,
and
so
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
you
all
would
be
interested
in
considering,
but
it's
been
raised
as
a
potential
thing.
We
would
talk
about
in
the
interoperability
seg
and
I
just
feel
like
we're
all
swimming
in
a
very
similar,
similar
areas.
So
just
thought
I'd
mention
that.
A
So
yeah
that's
good,
I
guess
maybe
I
will
propose
that
we
start
with
it
in
the
interoperability
zig
and
then
we
see
if
we
should
take
it
over
here
or
something
like
that
or
if
we
should.
I
guess
it's
not
just
about
events.
Then
of
course
it's
it's
more
broad,
and
so
since
it's
about
s
bombs
in
general,
I
guess.
F
Yeah,
definitely
I
just
wanted
to
raise
it.
You
know,
should
any
of
you
have
an
interest
in
that
area
that
this
was
something
we
would
probably
start
going
deeper
into
and
that
you
know,
of
course,
you're
all
welcome,
and
it
is
good
to
share
our
ideas
back
and
forth.
A
Of
course,
of
course,
yeah
thanks
for
that
input,
okay,
anything
else,
I'm
sorry
on
spx.
We
should
bring
in
I'll
put
this
as
an
action
on
steven.
E
A
A
I
think
it
maybe
it
might
be
valuable
to
have
shruti
here
when
we
discussed
it,
but
there
is
a
slack
post
and
I
linked
it
here,
so
you
can
read
if
you
haven't
already
and
comment
on
it
so
yeah
we
should
be
active.
I
would
say
in
this
area
as
well
as
much
as
possible,
discussing
this
with
jenkins,
because
it's
it's
very
valuable
for
us
to
be
aligned
with
without
jenkins
plug-in.
I
think
so.
Let's
try
to
be
there.
A
A
This
is
to
me
this
is
a
bit
more
detailed,
of
course,
about
the
protocol
itself
for
the
specifications,
so
maybe
it
should
actually
participate
or
it
should
land
on
the
vocabulary
meeting
I
think
more
than
in
this
zig,
maybe
on
the
on
specific
event
types
and
so
on.
A
So
I
think
that
falls
more
naturally
onto
the
vocabulary
meeting
if
we
should
have
a
good
division
of
concerns
in
the
different
meetings
so
we'll
see
if
we
come
back
to
it,
it's
only
two
minutes.
So
I
guess
we
might
not
have
time
to
look
into
these
discussions
again.
Sorry
for
that,
or
is
it
any
low-hanging
fruit?
Do
you
think
mathias
if
you've
been
part
of
this
bit
more
than
I
have
or
someone
else
that
we
could
maybe
just
say
something
about.
D
Nuts,
that
I
can
name
only
two
minutes,
at
least.
A
I
get
it
just
then
a
shout
out
to
everyone
that
please
involve
yourselves
in
these
discussions,
so
we
make
it
a
good
specification
and
that
shout
out
is
not
least
mentioned
meant
to
myself.