►
From YouTube: CDEvents Working Group (EMEA/AMERICAS) - Jan 10, 2023
Description
For more Continuous Delivery Foundation content, check out our blog: https://cd.foundation/blog/
A
A
C
Did
we
update
the
zoom
Link
in
the
in
the
meeting
invite.
B
Think
the
brain
reason
but
deal
with
the
break.
B
C
B
To
be
honest
today,
it's
my
first
day
after
the
holidays
so
like
the
same
I
didn't
have
much
prepared
for
today,
but
I
put
a
few
things
on
the
agenda
in
case
we
have
updates
things
that
we
want
to
discuss.
B
I,
don't
know
if,
if
you've
seen
it
jalander
and
Ben
the
last
couple
of
meetings
in
2022,
we
went
through
all
the
items
we
have
in
the
various
repos
and
kind
of
try
to
select
what
we
think
we
we
want
and
we
could
do
for
0.2
version
of
the
spec,
which
is
tended
to
replying
for
February
16th,
so
a
little
bit
more
than
a
month
from
now
so
not
much
time
yeah,
maybe
I
can
just
show
it
quickly
for
the
benefit
of
folks
that
were
not
involved.
B
So
we
have
a
few
items
in
here
that
at
least
tentatively,
we
want
to
keep
us
focused
for
everybody's
mouth
in
the
area
of
specs.
Well,
we
have
abbreviations.
B
We
have
the
new
incident
events
which
are
required
to
complete
the
four
Dora
metrics,
which
is
a
relatively
large
one,
but
yeah
we
adding
City
events,
terminology
to
the
CDF
seek
interoperability
page.
So
this
is
a
documentation,
one
which
I
believe
is
probably
done,
or
almost
done
by
now.
B
Then
we
have
well
payload
inversioning.
It
was
actually
we
hope
we
addressed
this,
but
there
was
a
question
open
to
you.
Ben.
If
you
have
a
chance
to
look
at
it
and
see
if
what
we
provided
with
custom
data
is
sufficient
or
if
there
is
any
thing
else,
anymore,
scope
that
needs
to
be
covered.
A
B
In
terms
of
work
group
of
Concepts,
the
durometric,
we
want
to
continue
there
with
the
incident
events.
Then
there
is
the
GitHub
to
City
events,
translation,
I,
think,
debuff
and
yeah.
B
Probably
Brad
I've
been
working
on
it
as
a
kid
of
action
and
also
update
and
revive
existing
pocs
to
City
Event
0.1,
and
then
we
have
work
on
the
sdks.
We
want
to
possibly
get
the
python
and
Java
SDK
aligned
with
the
spec,
yeah
and
I.
Think
that's
that's
all
we
have
included
in
scope
of
0.2.
B
B
B
B
Especially
I
mean
the
the
design
part
is
to
be
done,
working
progress,
but
I
guess
it
would
be
good
to
at
least
get
an
agreement
on
like
motivations
and
goals
and
requirements
use
cases
to
make
sure
that
we
are
aligned
and
what
we
want
to
achieve.
C
Cool
yeah
I
can
I
can
actually
take
a
look
at
this.
I'll
have
some
comments
like
by
the
end
of
this
week.
Yeah
like,
like
you,
said,
I've
been
break
holidays,
so
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
look
at
this,
nor
the
global
ID,
but
I'll
allocate
some
time
to
do
that.
For
you.
B
Yeah,
apart
from
that
I,
don't
know
if
there
anyone
has
updates
that
they
would
like
to
provide
on
the
go
like
SDK.
There
are
no
updates
from
my
site
at
least
I.
Don't
know
if
there
is
any
updates
on
the
Java
side
and
also
I
was
curious
if
there
was
any
update
on
the
work
with
Spinnaker,
which
I
landed
since
you're
a
year,
maybe
yeah.
E
So
yeah
there
are
a
couple
of
comments
from
the
different
members
from
the
skin
level.
I
think
I
have
updated
the
design
RNC,
so
that's
set
to
review
from
community,
so
I'm
planning
to
attend
there.
So
Givens
me,
if
possible,
that
is
on
this
coming.
Thursday
I
am
not
sure
like
whether
that
will
be
scheduled
or
not.
So
if,
if
it
is
there,
so
I
will
jump
into
their
meetings
and
and
try
to
discusses
that
and
their
meetings
yeah.
So
that's
about
the
RFC
design
proposal.
C
Yeah,
actually
Joiner
I
actually
want
to
talk
to
you
a
little
bit
about
the
RFC,
because
I
actually
I
was
one
of
the
people
that
was
accounting,
I'm
zib's.
The.
C
Yeah
and
maybe
I
can
like
talk
to
you
like
awful,
because
it's
mostly
just
like
you
know,
RFC,
like
format
and
like
kind
of
like
what
Spinnaker
is
looking
for,
because
I've
been
talking
with,
like
I
talked
with
Cameron
during
like
cdcon,
the
Spinnaker
Summit,
and
all
that-
and
he
has
a
kind
of
particular
like
format,
is
more
actually
it's
more
like
a
depth
and
he's
looking
for
actually
like
more
of
like
implementation
like
actual
algorithms
in
the
RFC
like
so
like.
C
You
know
like
how,
if
you
were
to
introduce
this
into
Spinnaker
like
what
changes
would
actually
need
to
be
done
like
to
Spinnaker
like
would
need
to
be
in
the
RFC,
so
it's
kind
of
like
like
what
I
was
trying
to
highlight,
but
I
didn't
want
to
go
too
much
because
I
was
hoping
like
camoud
would
actually
jump
in
because
I
didn't
want
to
like
speak
for
him,
but
that's
kind
of
like
what
he's
more
looking
for
like
what
changes
would
actually.
This
look
like
in
Spinnaker.
C
You
know
like
with
the
proposal,
because
you
know
like
I
understand
you
know
like
come
for
the
RFC.
You
know,
like.
Oh,
you
know
you
just
need
to
implement
this,
but
it's
like
okay.
What
does
that?
Look
like
in
Spinnaker
right,
so
I
think
that
part
was
like
I
haven't
looked
at
the
updates,
because
I
saw
you
did
make
a
few
updates,
but
that
was
the
part
that
was
kind
of
missing.
E
Yeah,
so
that
that's
what
I
have
actually
made
some
updates
based
on
your
comments,
so
probably
you
can
have
a
look
at
one,
so
we
can
have
a
discussion
further
things
would
be
more
clear,
yeah,
so
yeah.
C
Okay,
awesome
and
then,
rather
than
going
back
and
forth
on
on
GitHub
too,
let's
say
if
I
have
more
comments,
I'm
also
going
to
talk
with
Spinnaker
like
more
of
the
Spinnaker
like
Armory
and
optimax,
and
if
they
have
comments,
maybe
it's
a
good
idea
to
actually
get
us
all
in
a
in
a
room
right
in
a
meeting
and
just
kind
of
like
knock
out
the
RFC.
Would
you
be
okay
with
that
yeah
yeah?
Definitely.
E
D
E
Sorry
on
the
Java
SDK,
so
we
are
like
Adam
has
raised
one
PR,
so
that
is
in
progress.
So
he's
had
to
update
to
the
latest
specification
for
the
continuous
deployment,
even
so
that
is
spending
so
that
other
things
he
has
updated
in
the
with
the
pr,
probably
I
can
share
the
PRS
yeah
as
well.
C
C
I
won't
buy
I'll,
just
tag,
I'll
tag,
everyone
in
the
in
the
channel
and
whoever
wants
to
invites
I
think
I
can
send
it
directly
to
you
guys,
I'm
good.
B
Okay,
that
sounds
great
yeah.
Is
there
anything
else,
any
other
update
from
anyone
anything
else
you
would
like
to
to
bring
up
or
discuss
today.
D
C
Coming
up
and
whatnot
I'll
try
to
get
I'll
try
to
get
a
review
like
I
said:
I
have
a
lot
of
stuff.
I
need
to
do,
especially
with
the
now
with
the
global
IDs
and
the
link
connecting
and
and
now
the
RFC.
But
if
that
meeting
does
happen,
I'll
try
to
get
that
scheduled
within
the
next
week
or
two.
So
at
least
we'll
have
something
to
talk
about.
You
know
for
the
next
Sig
meeting,
so
that'll
be
kind
of
my
my
plan.
C
But
that's
I
I
didn't
have
too
much
I
hope
you
all
had
a
wonderful
holiday,
though.
C
C
Yeah,
well
it
wasn't
too
sharp.
Just
relaxed
didn't
do
too
much
family
visited
so
that
that
was
always
really
nice.
So
yeah.