►
From YouTube: CDF SIG Interoperability Meeting 2020-06-25
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
E
E
B
B
A
Great
I'll
I'll
share
and
start
sharing
the
the
notes
so
that
we
all
have
that
sound
good
and
we
can
start
going
through
I.
Imagine
most
first
people
here
who
are
going
to
be
here.
It's
five
minutes
after
shall
we
do
a
quick
round
of
introductions,
make
sure
y'all
know
I'm
Cara
I
work
like
lobbies
with
the
juniors
X
project.
C
F
A
Okay,
great
I,
believe
that
is
everyone
on
the
call
is
that
correct,
yeah
I
think
so
great.
Thank
you
all
for
introducing
yourselves
welcome.
It's
very
good,
see
one
of
the
things
that
we're
really
pushing
forward
right
now
is
the
work
streams
really
excited
to
hear
more
about
how
the
event
see
ICD
is
finding
their
working
group
and
how
the
progress
they're,
making
first
we'll
review
action
items,
but
just
quickly
does
anyone
have
anything
they
want
to
add
to
the
agenda
for
today,
I.
B
A
B
A
B
A
That's
absolutely
fine.
That's
great!
Thank
you
to
review
the
road
map.
I
hope
everyone
has
taken
a
look
at
the
road
map.
You
can
see
the
link
in
the
agenda
notes
here.
I
imagine
most
of
you
have
seen
it
so
please
it's
an
open
document.
Please
give
feedback
and
additions
to
the
road
map.
Is
there
anything?
In
particular,
we
would
like
to
discuss
about
the
road
map
today.
B
A
Thank
you
just
to
quickly
go
over
the
action
items
and
then
we'll
go
back
to
your
church
additions
to
the
road
map.
Actually,
that
would
be
great
if
you
want
to
present
and
share
on
that.
John
is
not
here,
I'm
talking
to
Andrew
and
you
would
great
to
have
Christy
as
well,
and
we
reached
out
to
spinnaker
folks
so
perfect
good
on
to
the
the
road
map.
Would
you
like
to
present
him
in
and
and
talk
about
your
additions
that
you've
made.
D
A
C
A
B
Yeah
I
think
that
those
comments
like
tearing
from
me
like
more
than
one
month
old,
and
that
is
actually
the
top
it's
one
of
the
topics
we
could
perhaps
discuss
with
regards
to
old
maps.
So
I
think
Tracy
started
this
document
like
three
months
ago,
around
February
March,
to
like
set
the
roadmap
and
the
way
she
envisioned
it
like
to
have
like
near-term
and
long-term
goals,
and
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
because
we
can't
really
easily
plan
exact
date
or
we
can't
really
put
timeframe
because
it
really
depends
on
community
engagement
and
I.
B
Haven't
seen
too
many
comments
regarding
that
approach,
which
makes
me
think
people
agree
to
that
way
of
structuring
road
map
and
the
other
comments
there
like
this,
extending
the
road
map
into
CI
as
well.
So
looking
at
this
as
a
holistic,
CI
CD
and
there
wasn't
any
no
objections
with
and
I
believe,
Andre
said
some
comments,
two
months
earlier,
which
Tracy
made
and
parked
off
to
document
and
I
think
the
document
is
pretty
settled
like
excluding
latest
updates.
B
And
since
like
this
will
end
up
a
spoon
request,
people
will
still
have
chance
to.
You
know,
suggest
improvements
or
comment
on
things.
So
this,
like
we
take
this
a
snapshot
of
today
and
we
put
it
to
get
others
to
request
and
we
continue
adjusting
during
that
school
request
and
if
we
get
that
accepted
within
the
rapport,
that
gives
us
version
one
or
version
point
one
of
our
roadmap,
and
then
we
can
publicize
this
as
well.
By
with
the
help
from
CDF
saying
that
the
roadmap
is
available
and
come
and
contribute
collaborating.
Oh
yeah.
B
B
When
you
take
to
read
only
the
comments,
stay
as
they
are,
and
you
can
all
you
can.
I
am
NOT
good
in
Google
Docs.
So
please,
if
you
know,
as
most
Google
Docs
better
than
me,
I
think
you
have
three
access
levels
in
Google
Docs,
like
we'd,
only
comment
on
me
and
editor
writer.
We
may
even
ask
trace
to
make
this
document
like
comment
only
and
someone
ends
up
in
this
document
and
as
a
commenter,
we
can
direct
that
person
to
github
and
still
get
the
comments
available
on
the
document.
B
A
Okay,
so
this
will
be
interesting
to
hear
what
the
CCI
CD
events
workstream
things
I
thought.
She
asked
me
to
draw
the
basics
and
the
the
start
of
interoperability
works.
James,
covenants
talk,
it
is
only
at
the
very
beginning.
Please
make
comments.
Tracey
was
really
quick
on
her
cheek
that
BR,
so
it's
now
part
of
the
repo,
but
but
it's
still
very
much
part
of
an
iterative
process.
So
we
will
be
adding
to
this,
and
all
comments
are
very
welcome.
A
B
B
Like
you
know
this,
we
came
up
with
this
work
stream
idea,
so
it
wasn't
part
of
governance
or
anything
now,
thanks
to
Cara
the
kind
of
introduced,
a
very
lightweight
governments
and
make
this
works
in
setup
officials,
so
other
people
can
follow
the
example
you
set
and
come
up
with
new
ideas
to
create
work
streams
with.
So
the
idea
with
this
topic
is
basically
to
get
your
input
on
this,
like
lightweight
governments
and
life
cycle,
and
so
on,
for
the
work
stream
set
up.
Okay,.
F
So
if
someone
wants
to
make
a
new
work,
show
my
gosh
yeah,
okay,
not
making
sense.
Okay,
the
coverton's,
where
the
works
you,
okay,
yeah,
like
I,
think
I
feel
a
lot
of
ideas
came
from
you
know,
but
there's
several
of
us
in
the
events,
work
stream,
I
think
we're
pretty
well
organized
I'm,
just
reading
the
overview
right
now.
Sorry,
if
I
don't
see
the
before
we
kind
of
mimic
this
meeting
right
like
when
we
break
out
to
the
work
stream,
so
we
try
to
record
it.
F
I,
don't
know
if
we
publish
it
anywhere
because
a
lot
of
it's
us
discussing
things
like
you
know,
kind
of
back
and
forth
what
what
kind
of
feedback
or
what
kind
of
like
points
it
was
actually
pretty
we
stuff
organized
we
all
get
along
pretty
well.
So
it's
like
this
behavior
fight
like
there
wasn't
anything
too
contentious.
Nobody
talked
about,
but
also,
like
part
part
of
the
challenge
that
we
have
is
like
hey.
F
B
Think
you
summarized
it
well,
because
the
the
gun
or
all
the
real
motivation
also
summarizes
the
works.
They
set
up
that
way
like
the
projects
or
user
representatives
like
basically,
people
can
come
together
self
organize
and
come
up
to
seek
saying
at
all.
We
have
this
idea:
can
we
work
on
it
and
s6?
We
can
help
you
work
that
way
by
you
know,
contacting
foundation
stuff,
asking
like
recording
uploading,
recording
studio,
for
example,
or
creating
a
folder
for
you
in
the
repository
and
making
this
official.
B
So
it's
basically
trying
to
enable
people
to
come
up
with
these
things,
and
also
the
other
things
in
the
document
that
highlight
is
basically
is
the
expectation
on
work
stream
is
to
come
and
present
the
progress
to
seek
regularly
like
every
quarter
or
something
like
it.
It's
up
to
work
stream,
obviously,
but
just
keep
the
rest
of
the
sig
up
to
date
with
progress
they
may
be
having
or
any
blockers
they
may
have.
B
So
this
C
get
large
and
CDF
could
help
those
people
with
those
things
and
another
thing
which
is
not
documented
in
this
document,
which
was
one
of
my
comments,
is
basically
the
events
work
stream
started
with
in
Singapore.
But
if
you
look
at
security
sig,
for
example,
they
have
separately
post
stories
per
work
stream
like
they
have
this.
Software
Bill
of
Materials
has
its
own
app,
oh
and
another
repo
for
another
work
stream,
so
like
in
a
month's
time.
If
you
say
oh,
we
should
really
get
our
only
poster
for
our
work
stream.
C
B
F
F
D
D
If
we
share
our
outcome-
and
there
is
the
both
our
meetings
marked
down
and
also
the
readme
Mark
Thomas,
so
we
create
two
documents.
One
is
for.
The
meetings
is
very
similar
to
this
signaling
documents,
and
they
look
at
now
is
to
read
me,
and
that
is
something
that
we
started
last
meeting
this
Monday,
where
we
intend
to
mortis,
publish
the
intent
with
the
group
and
the
outcome
that
we
had.
A
One
of
the
things
that
I
would
really
like
to
have
come
out
of
these
work,
streams
and
I
think
would
be
beneficial,
for
everyone
is
definitely
the
sharing
back
of
findings,
because
I
think
I
think
it
got
help
spread
knowledge
and
awareness
to
more
people,
but
also
like
other
people,
will
be
like.
Oh
actually,
no
I
know
this
colleague.
He
would
be
really
interested
in
just
pulling
pulling
more
people
to
the
different
work
streams.
A
I
just
think
that
process,
we're
like
you,
can
have
very
specific
groups
that
focus
on
something
in
depth
and
then
share
to
the
wider
group
is
really
beneficial
and
I.
Think
the
sharing
part
is
a
really
key
part
of
what
so
whenever,
whenever
you
know
it's
up
to
you
to
decide
your
cadence
of
sharing
but
I,
think
it's
something
I'm
very
interested
in
and
yeah.
We
would
welcome
you
to
present
what
you're
finding
what
you're
discussing
to
this
sake
either
today.
D
G
A
I
have
a
question
actually
for
for
fatty
and
for
the
sig
and
starting
a
new
work
stream.
We
want
this
to
be
really
open
process,
so
anyone
who
has
an
idea
for
a
work
stream
can
suggest
it,
and
do
we
have
any
idea
of
how
that
specific
process
should
work.
Should
we
just
mention
it
in
this
sig
and
then
just
go
off
and
do
it
and
then
PR
the
repo
with
our
with
our
information
or
is
there
anything
that
we
want
to
add
to
that
process?
I
think.
B
The
documents
can
be
updated
with
a
single
sentence
saying
that.
Ok,
if
we
are
an
idea
for
my
work
stream,
open
an
issue
in
the
cigrip,
oh
and
top
it
to
the
meeting
agenda,
and
that's
it
I
think
so.
People
can
publicize
socialize
their
idea
to
see
if
an
analysis,
interesting
topic
and
broad
on
the
regional
like
it
should
be
as
simple
as
we
can
make
it.
You
know.
A
E
So
so
I
think
it
was
a.
There
was
some
really
good
feedback
that
we
had
and
it's
a
while
back
from
I
forget
his
name
from
eBay,
our
friend
from
eBay
and,
and
he
was
kind
of
mentioning
it
runs
with
Jenkins
X,
and
what
quite
rightly
said
that
we
were
using
the
slightly
older
version,
we're
not
rolling
up
to
date
with
the
latest
features,
and
this
is
what
James
actually
be
doing,
especially
from
an
interrupt
point
of
view.
E
We
want
to
have
a
good
winter
story,
good
open
source
citizens
and
certainly
around
seeing
the
earth
and
and
sharing
as
well
some
of
our
experiences
and
the
perfect
place,
for
that
sounds
like
the
the
catalog
that
they've
been
working
on,
which
we
haven't
integrated
with
yet
there's
a
lot
of
reusable
tasks
there
that
are
already
great
and
we
want
to
be
contributing
to
those
as
well,
and
we
want
to
open
that
those
that
catalog
to
users
of
Jenkins
X
as
well
so
I
think
that's
really
the
top
level.
How
that
happens?
E
No
idea
yeah
definitely
love
the
sound
of
these
working
groups
that
have
been
started
and,
and
so
sounds
like
a
really
great
way
to
kind
of
start
something
out
there
and
get
right
from
the
inception.
Think
how
we
might
do
that
and
what
the
problem
is
and
take
those
steps.
So
I've
been
listening
to
the
two
that
work,
the
events
in
working
group
and
we
certainly
take
some
lessons,
maybe
share.
Maybe
if
you've
got
to
be
involved
as
well,
we
could
share
some
of
those
experiences
as
well.
A
Any
other
comments,
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
that
this
cig
and
would
be
interesting
for
so
that's
a
very
specific
work
stream,
but
nonetheless
like
a
lot
of
the
topics
and
learnings
and
approaches
maybe
or
more
widely
applicable.
So
it's
really
interesting
to
consider
how
Jenkins
X
would
integrate
with
sex
on
carlac
and
then
to
talk
about
how
other
projects
are.
Considering
doing
that
or
already
doing
that.
A
B
A
A
C
B
So
before
we
move
to
next
topic,
I
put
an
AP
on
you
know
X
night
anyakara
to
update
to
works
team
going
on
with
the
process
for
creation
of
new
work
streams.
And
if
you
want
to
action
yourself
about
Chris
proposing
these
new
works,
the
moon,
Tecton
catalog
I.
Leave
that
to
you
because
it's
like
it's
not
like
an
action.
I
item
for
the
seat,
but
it's
up
to
you
to
you
know
side
that
okay.
B
B
You
know
messed
up
everything
and
the
idea
was
to
have
you
know,
working
summits
with
the
people
from
different
projects
and
fix
to
come
together,
spend
a
day
or
two
working
on
cross-community
cross
project
topics,
interval
topics
and
so
on,
and
because
of
coded
that
event
didn't
happen
and
I'm
done.
Lauren
sent
another
me
mail
like
two
weeks
ago
or
so
asking
if
issue
that
is
in
virtual
settings,
and
we
had
a
meeting
last
week
to
discuss
this
and
I
think
this
virtual
collaboration
working
some.
B
It
will
happen
and
I
got
an
action
from
that
meeting
to
you
know,
bring
this
topic
to
the
siege
and
ask
if
anyone
has
any
ideas
with
regards
to
potential
topics
like
reusable
libraries
or
even
CI
CD,
to
make
part
of
this
collaboration
summit
and
the
other
idea
about
the
summit
is
to
have
cross
project.
The
most
highlighting
like
cross-community
working
like
Tecton
and
Jenkins
leaks
or
spinnaker,
with
Jenkins
and
so
on.
So
if
people
don't
have
like
a
specific
topic
to
take
part
in,
they
can
go
into
that
demo.
B
C
I
was
appointed
to
chair
of
that
subcommittee.
I
think
it
would
be
really
good
to
have
especially
the
wage
Jenkins
action.
Tecton
is
doing
the
you
know
that
interoperability
to
just
highlight
that
I
think
I
could
help
spearhead
the
interoperability
with
spinnaker
and
Jenkins
I.
Think
more.
What
we
want
to
know
is,
does
everybody
see
value
in
doing
this,
and
if
we
did
this,
would
you
attend,
and
possibly
especially
you
know,
for
James
and
Cara-
highlights
Dinkins
X
and
also
spearhead
the
spinnaker
and
Jenkins
I
think
more?
C
C
And
I
think
what
the
larger
goal
to
achieve
from
this
sort
of
I'm
calling
it
a
working
summit,
is
to
show
not
only
what
is
being
done,
but
make
that
a
blueprint
for
other
projects
to
start
working
on
interoperability
and
making
the
community
from
a
larger
viewpoint,
work
together
across
work,
sort
of
SIG's
or
work
streams.
However,
you
want
to
call
it.
D
Say
from
my
perspective,
I'm
generally
interested
in
discussing
them
inter
preventive
between
tours.
So
that's
how
that
works.
So
that's
I
would
think
love
to
be
involved
in
such
a
discussion.
I'm
not
in
particularly
interested
right
now,
at
least
enjoying
is
extra
text
on
we're
not
using
either
of
those
right
now
we
could
start
using
it,
of
course,
but
since
I
don't
know
them
that
well,
I
guess:
I'm
I
will
not
neither
provide
much
input
in
such
a
discussion
and
either
I
won't
even
get
too
much
out
of
it.
D
E
Things
have
not
just
a
like
an
intro,
we
chose
X
and
Tecton
and
Jenkins
in
in
spinnaker,
but
also
all
for
many
others
as
well.
So
having
con
standardization
around
some
metadata
things
like
environments
and
various
releases
and
various
things
that
we
can,
the
toolings
will
still
continue
to
build
around,
but
having
some
kind
of
standardization
Smike
might
help
so
that
they
may
they
may
maybe
not
the
implementation
of
it
Amil.
It
might
be
something
maybe
similar
to
open
standards
that
you
might
come
out
with
or
specifications
that
might
might
help.
I
agree.
B
So
I
her
question.
Mark
ii,
like
I
like
the
initial
date
for
this
summit,
if
it
happens,
was
around
july
20,
something
yeah
I
actually
raised
like
concern
about
like
whether
will
be
good
attendance
or
not
because
it's
summer
and
so
on.
Has
there
been
any
further
conversations
around
the
possible
potential
date.
C
It
is
still
being
discussed.
I
can
tell
you
that
tomorrow
there
will
be
an
additional
discussion
going
on
that
and
we
are
going
on
around
that
and
we
are
taking
into
consideration
that
most
in
the
UK
just
you
know,
go
on
vacation
for
holiday.
So
look
for
more
of
that
and
then
by
the
next
outreach
meeting.
C
B
So
then
its
recently
watched
the
mail
list
and
if,
when
this
mail
is
sent
out,
we
can
just
propose
topics
or
and
the
selectional
or
whatever
you
proposed.
Last
week,
Marquis
like
having
some
slack
channel
for
this
type
of
work
and
then
we
can
just
propose
some
topics
that
and
then
see
where
we
end
up.
Yeah.
C
So
if
everybody's
sort
of
familiar
with
how
the
unconference
format
works,
thinking
of
doing
sort
of
the
same
thing
and
using
voting
in
slack
so
essentially
a
topic
will
be
proposed
and
people
will
there'll
be
a
little
a
local
mailing,
Item
that'll
go
out,
people
will
go
into
slack,
they
will
make
a
you
know,
propose
a
topic,
and
then
everybody
will
vote
on
that
topic
in
slack,
I've
done
it
for
the
CNC
F
community
for
the
contributor
summit.
It
works
really
really
well.
A
We
we
do
have
a
schedule,
it
is
getting
fleshed
out.
We
have
next
meeting
in
two
weeks
time.
Andrew
will
be
speaking
on
lighthouse.
It
might
be
interesting
if
we
can
arrange
it
to
have
Christy
and
some
other
folks
speak.
I
have
reached
out
again
to
the
drone
folks.
I
haven't
received
a
response
yet
well,
we
shall
see,
but
it
will
be
interesting
to
pull
that
and
if
we
can
and
then
we
also
have
a
speaker
on
spinnaker
from
Emory
on
July
23rd.
A
So
July
is
pretty
well
covered
for
presentations,
but
if
there
are
any
other
presentations,
people
in
your
network
that
you
think
will
be
great
to
present
on
something
they're
working
on,
please
to
invite
them
and-
and
they
can
put
their
information
on
the
presentation
schedule,
including
we
have
a
backlog.
We
have
you
know,
project
presentations,
so
they
can
put
their
name
here
if
they're
still
working
out
the
dates,
you're,
not
sure
where
who's
going
to
be
speaking
exactly
and
then
when
it's
more
confirmed,
we'll
move
them
on
to
the
schedule.
A
B
D
D
D
A
Good,
okay,
I
think
we
can
close
out
today
and
please
do
invite
any
of
your
colleagues
to
speak
with
us
again
to
attend
the
sake.
You
may
be
interested
in
the
work
that
we're
doing
here
and
I
think
the
work
streams
will
be
really
interesting
and
and
will
be
grip
size
to
collaborate
and
then
bring
those
findings
to
a
wider
audience
through
the
SIG's
I'm
really
excited
about
that.
Please
keep
an
eye
out
for
the
work
stream
on
Jenkins,
X
and
Tecton
catalog.
That
would
be
great
to
have
as
many
people
involved
as
possible.
A
If
you
have
any
commentary
you'd
like
to
make
on
how
we're
doing
the
right
work
streams
or,
for
example,
the
events
see
ICD
work
stream
when
you
feel
like
you
would
like
to
give
a
wider
presentation
or
if
you
want
to
do
just
regular
updates,
just
put
it
on
the
agenda,
because
we
would
like
to
hear
about
what
you're
working
on
and
I
think
that's
it
for
today.
Is
there
anything
else,
Betty.