►
From YouTube: CDF - TOC Meeting 2021-04-27
Description
For more Continuous Delivery Foundation content, check out our blog: https://cd.foundation/blog/
A
D
E
G
H
H
H
H
H
Here's
the
agenda,
please
add
other
things.
If
you
like,
we
have
one
discussion
topic.
I
want
to
try
to
make
time
for
for
carrie,
because
I
think
I
missed
it
when
he
added
this
and
it
unfairly
got
added
at
the
bottom
of
the
agenda.
So
apologies
terry,
but
we'll
try
to
move
quick
to
make
sure
we
get
some
time
to
go
over
your
question.
H
L
H
D
H
D
J
D
D
D
And
so
the
main
feedback
I'd
like
to
get
folks
from
each
of
the
projects
to
comment
on
what
we'd
be
asking
for
is
sort
of,
let's
say
a
two-week
period
where
the
projects
put
their
heads
together.
Typically
the
governing
board
or
the
technical
steering
committee
or
whatever
is
the
top
level
body
of
the
projects,
and
then
they
through
some
internal
process
of
their
own
choosing.
They
put
forward
one
candidate
to
run
at
the
cdf.
D
M
N
M
N
Yeah,
we
are
using
a
platform
called
thieves
for
voting.
We
introduced
it
for
governance
elections.
Basically,
it's
a
system
which
uses
transferable
world
and
it's
quite
trendy
and
you
can
set
up
for
voting
in
a
few
minutes.
So
if
someone
is
interested,
I
can
show
how
to
use
it.
You
don't
need
special
account
and
as
long
as
voting
can
animus,
you
also
don't
need
to
like
collect
any
special
data.
M
N
Yes,
so
I
think
that
so
on
the
very
tight
schedule
we
would
need
one
week.
So
let's
say
we
send
call
from
nominations
today:
collect
feedback.
Then
the
voting
can
approve
the
final
candidate
at
the
next
governance
meeting.
It
will
be
next
wednesday
if
we
miss
this
time.
Then
yeah
jenkins
uses
open
governance
and
governance
meeting.
Is
our
end
decision
work?
H
Yeah,
I
can
just
explain:
they
have
a
five-member
governing
board
who
meets
pretty
regularly,
so
they
can.
They
should
be
able
to
figure
out
something
here.
I
guess
like
we're
kind
of
outsourcing
the
entire
selection
process
to
projects
here
right.
They
could
just
have
their
governing
boards
vote
and
pick
they
could.
P
H
D
Exactly
yeah
so
yeah
the
governing
board
could
decide
just
within
them.
Let's
say
tact
on.
If
it
was
five
people
they
could
just
get
together
and
just
pick
one
person
and
put
them
forward
or
they
could
open
it
up
to
all
contributors
to
vote
so
yeah
totally
up
to
the
communities
and
how
how
they
want
to
handle
it.
D
L
D
D
D
H
D
A
H
D
H
Yeah,
so
there
will
be
a
list
of
all
of
the
voters
and
then
an
email,
if
I
remember,
and
how
kubernetes
and
other
projects
run
it.
There's
a
list
of
voters
and
emails
get
sent
to
the
addresses
that
we
have
on
file
which
we
should
have
for
everyone.
That's
contributed
because
of
the
cla
and
other
stuff
like
that.
C
D
D
J
A
bunch
of
projects
oleg
has
been
glorious
at
doing
initial
whacking
of
mentors
for
review.
I
say
that
with
love.
He
was
very
polite
about
it.
I
think
we've
identified
a
couple
of
projects
that
didn't
meet
the
standards
and
kind
of
winnowing
it
down.
We
have
an
outstanding
question
and
actually
that
now
might
be,
I
think
I
heard
steven
tracy
an
outstanding
question
on
the
ortelius
project.
Steve
is
is
this:
is
this
person
someone
that
was
already
working
with
the
project.
Q
J
Q
J
J
Okay,
so
I
know
we
have
some
concerns
about
the
project.
We
also
have
limited
project
availability
outside
of
the
jenkins
space.
So
I'm
not
given
that
this
is
my
person,
my
only
second
time
with
the
gsoc
situation.
I
guess
oleg
I'd
love
to
hear.
Maybe
what
concerns
that
you
have
as
far
as
you
know,
whether
or
not
weaker
projects
impact
our
spots
allocation
or
how
this
stuff
kind
of
works.
N
Yes,
so
basically,
when
the
organizations
apply
for
slots,
they
send
me
two
numbers:
one
is
a
minimum
project
source
number
another
one
is
maximum
one,
so
the
minimum
one
is
basically.
What
is
our
preference
to
get?
We
are
not
going
to
get
this
number
and
maximum
is
a
absolute
number.
What
google
can
provide
so
historically
jenkins
used
to
receive
something
between
a
minimum
and
maximum
and
usually
closer
to
maximum
but
yeah?
H
H
B
D
And
I
I
think
I
can
share
an
update
here.
I
believe
we've
have
had
submissions
from
every
project
and
all
the
the
sigs,
and
I
think
we
managed
to
work
it
out
that
there
were
not
too
many
people
clamoring
for
the
same
spot,
so
everybody
got
their
first
choice
session
with
the
exception.
The
only
one
that's
not
fully
scheduled
yet
is
the
best
practices
sig
and
we've
got
a
couple
of
options
of
how
we
might
run
that
so
we're
seeing
if
we'll
keep
it
narrowly
focused
or
wider,
focused.
B
B
spinnaker
summit
is
at
5.92,
so
we're
really
healthy
in
registrations.
We
also
yesterday
had
some
more
requests
and
inquiries
on
like
some
startups
inquiring
on
sponsorship
sales,
but
as
of
right
now
we
are
projected
to
close
at
269
hundred.
If
those
additional
sponsorships
come
in
then
we'll
close
at
283.
B
So
we
would
have
met
our
goal
and
surpassed
it
by
eighty
three
thousand
dollars
best
case
scenario.
Otherwise,
it'll
be
about
69.5,
so
yeah
we're
doing
really
well
and
like
we
mentioned
just
scheduling
right
now
with
speakers
and
getting
them
to
start
scheduling
their
recording
session
with
with
tim
but
yeah.
I
think
that's
the
biggest
update
for
cbcon.
H
D
Thanks
for
those,
and
just
as
a
final
mention
for
folks
who
attend
the
outreach
meeting,
I
believe
next
tuesday
we
are
aiming
if
everything
goes
well
to
to
have
the
folks
from
hop
in
come
along
and
just
demo
some
of
the
the
latest
integration.
So
they
they
have
some
integrations
with
other
platforms
like
slido
and
miro
and
twitter.
D
K
The
the
hot
topic
of
conversation
for
the
mlp
sig
last
week
was
was
the
the
leaked
proposal
for
regulation
of
ai
and
machine
learning
in
the
eu,
and
I
don't
know
if
anyone
has
actually
had
a
look
at
it
or
seen
any
of
the
stories
around
it.
But
it's
it's
based
on
multiple
serious
misunderstandings
of
what
machine
learning
is
and
how
it
works,
and
it's
a
effectively
a
functional
ban
on
doing
machine
learning
in
the
european
union.
J
L
J
D
Yeah,
no,
I
think,
like
being
able
to
reach
out
and
involve
folks
in
the
conversation,
would
be
great.
I
guess
my
questions
are
mostly
around
logistics
of
like
do.
We
know
who
those
folks
are.
Is
there
like?
Do
you
have
any
thoughts
on
how
we
would
engage,
or
is
this
something
we'd
have
to
go,
investigate
and
just
figure
out.
K
R
K
D
K
K
Yeah
yeah,
so
there's
a
the
the
the.
The
brief
is
that
you,
you
would
have
to
get
third
party
accreditation
for
any
application
that
they
deemed
fell
foul
of
the
legislation
and
there
are
lots
of
challenges
involved.
You
know,
for
example,
you're
they're
thinking
about
this
as
a
as
an
immutable,
you
know
release,
so
you
would
get
accreditation
on
one
version
of
a
model
and
that
model
would
have
to
be
immutable,
so
you
couldn't
upgrade
the
model
without
having
to
go
through
the
accreditation
process
again.
J
K
K
K
D
C
J
I
suspect
there's
going
to
be
an
industry
response
and
probably
a
coalition
of
you
know
normally
enemies,
but
the
enemy
of
my
enemy
is
my
ally.
This
has
the
potential
for
huge
impact,
so
I
I
suspect,
the
linux
foundation
level
throwing
its
weight
behind.
That
is
the
most
likely
outcome,
but
we
should
watch
it.
N
N
But
yeah
lfx
security
is
currently
expected
if
you
use
other
linux
foundation,
services
like,
for
example,
community
bridge
hall
effects
mentorship
because
it's
a
part
of
the
dashboards.
Also,
if
you
want
to
have
current
transaction
initiative
again
known
points
called
effects
security.
Quite
specifically,
so
it
may
be
transitively
a
requirement
for
graduation
of
new
cdf
projects,
just
keep
it
in
mind,
but
yeah
in
general.
It's
just
sneak.
So
it's
licensed
scanning
dependencies
coming
some
code.
Analysis
all
is
reasonable.
If
you're
interested
to
adopt
it.
H
N
E
So
so
for
typhoon,
I
I
checked
this
hosted
version
some
time
ago
and
it's
enabled
so
you
can
see
the
scanning
going
on
the
thing
that
I
was
missing.
There
was
a
kind
of
way
to
to
access
that
information
programmatically
if
you
will,
as
opposed
to
having
to
go
into
the
dashboard
and
look
at
the
maybe
the
issues
there,
but
still
it's
good
to
have
that
information.