►
From YouTube: DASH Behavioral Model Weekly 20220329 (March 29, 2022)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Or
the
sonic
using
the
new
ipdk
layer
that
you
mentioned
and
it
uses
the
dpdk
pipeline,
which
is
p
for
programmable,
hence
p4dpdk,
so
yeah.
That
work
is
ongoing.
I
think
in
in
some
time
I
won't
be
able
to
tell
exactly
when
I
would
say
in
q2,
early
q2,
probably
mid
q2
we'll
be
able
to
demo,
and
definitely
this
work
will
be
open
source.
It
will
be
in
the
pna
architecture.
A
B
Thank
you,
russia,
I
actually
I
I
was
referring
specifically
to
support
for
the
adonis
and
modifiable
table
entries.
I
guess
in
order
to
do
connection
tracking
you,
you
need
to
have
that
yes,
but
but
is
it
something
that's
already
available
today
I
mean
you
spoke
about
two
different
things.
If
I
understood
correctly,
one
is
the
integration
with
sonic
and
the
other
one
is
the
the
implementation
of
the
overlay
and
the
support
for
these
stateful
functionalities.
B
A
I
in
just
a
couple
of
weeks,
probably
in
our
next
call,
I
will
be
able
to
update
on
exactly
when
the
p40
pdk,
with
a
hit
on
I
hit
on
miss
add-on,
miss
my
goodness.
Sorry
about
that.
I
have
lots
of
things.
Coming
up
will
be
available
right.
The
connection
tracking,
I
think
it's
in
full
progress
either
it
is
already
demoed
or
will
be
coming
soon.
A
Yeah,
mario,
if
there
are
any
questions,
please
send
them
over
yeah.
I
think
that
work
is
in
progress.
I
can
update,
probably
even
sooner
than
the
next
call,
if
it
is
urgent
to
make
any
decisions-
or
you
know
I'll
I'll.
C
A
About
the
behavioral
model,
you
know
volunteer
sink
call,
but
that's
I
will
try
my
best
to
see
if
I
have
some
answer
by
tomorrow.
Thanks.
B
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
it's
more
more
up
to
marion,
because
I
mean
they
are
working
on
the
behavioral
model,
so
they
might
want
to.
You
know,
decide
whether
to
invest
on
that
one
or
just
use
the
you
know
the
p4
pdk.
I
don't
know
so.
I
was
asking
more
for
their
for
their
planning.
Yeah.
D
Right
now
we
are
considering
both
because
we
don't
know
where-
which
one
would
be
better.
So
as
soon
as
we
will
have
both
actually
available.
Maybe
then
we
can
think
about
what
to
choose
right
now.
We
don't
even
know
where
effort
will
be
bigger,
where
the
integration
is
more
difficult
to
do
so
yeah.
So
we
are
working
on
bmv2
and
we
would
be
glad
to
see
what's
the
status
with
dpdke
as
soon
as
it
is
available.
So,
let's,
let's
maybe
wait
for
that.
C
And
I
I
did
see
something
in
my
email
about
actually
running
the
pipeline
and
marion
had
made
a
suggestion.
I
can't
dig
in
my
email
right
now.
Well,
maybe
I
can
here
muhammad
muhammad.
So
do
you
do
you
guys
want
to
let
everyone
know
what
you
were
talking
about
for
that
particular
issue.
E
F
C
Changed
so
yeah
and
then
and
then
marion
replied
here.
C
So
if
you
change
these
here,
it
will
work
with
bmv2.
Is
that
clear
to
everybody.
F
G
Can
you
send
that
this
email
to
the
group
christian.
C
Yeah
I'll
clean
it
up
and
send
it
out
sure
I
will
make
a
note
to
do
that
great
and
so
overall,
for
these
pieces
right
here
in
the
backlog,
can
we
move
forward
with
bmv2
without
these
marion.
C
Well,
in
the
in
the
development
we
said,
we
need
all
of
these
features
and
it
doesn't
look
like
we
have
resourcing
to
work
on
these.
So
in
order
for
the
whole
model
to
work,
we
need
these
things
right.
C
So
I'll
bring
it
up
again
in
the
community
meeting
and
see
tomorrow
and
see
if
anyone
can
free
up
to
look
at
these.
G
G
Iap
generator
or
like.
D
So
for
connection
tracking,
we
haven't
finalized
that
yet
I
don't
know
if
this
is
going
to
be
auto
generated,
or
maybe
it
will
be
a
fixed
ati.
We
don't.
C
G
E
So
yeah,
I
have
a
question
guys
you
know
so
on
these
ones.
I
was
looking
at
all
the
the
backlog
part,
and
then
I
was
thinking
about
whether
I
could
you
know
sign
up
for
say,
ipv6
support,
so
my
question
for
marianne
is
before
I
basically
do.
That
is
that,
if,
if
there
is
a
you
know
equivalent,
you
know,
support
provided
for
ipv4.
E
Is
that,
along
the
same
lines
that
we
have
that
we
have
to
provide
the
ipv6
support
as
well?
So
if
there
is
already
an
example
of
you
know,
ipv4
support
that
is
available.
That
would
really
help
to.
E
Okay,
now
there
is
an
equivalent
support
that
is
there
and
then
can.
If
you
can
point
me
to
that,
then
then
then
I
can,
you
know
they'll
become
a
much
more.
You
know
smoother
transition
for
me
to
really
take
over
and
then
you
know
say:
okay,
if
I
can
basically
add
the
ipv6
support
for
it.
D
Okay,
okay,
so
basically
all
of
the
much
action
tables
that
are
working
with
ipv4
but
to
require
ipv6
support.
I
I
can
get
you
that.
E
Yeah,
if
you
can
get
me
that
so
so
chris
christina,
if
you
could,
you
know,
sign
me
up
for
ipvc
support,
then
then
I'll
go
ahead
and
basically
you
know
work
on
it.
C
I'm
still
kind
of
learning
how
to
work
with
these
great.
So
that's
really
all
I
had
for
today
guys
marion
did
you
have
anything
else.
C
D
C
D
C
Okay,
great
well,
then
you
and
I
can
work
on
that
offline
throughout
the
week
and
come
up
with
come
up
with
the
priority.
So
anything
else
from
the
rest
of
you
guys
on
the
phone
I
feel
like
marion,
and
I
and
a
few
people
have
been
talking
a
lot.
So
is
there
anything
else
you
want
to
bring
up
before
we
go.
G
Yes,
you
can
say
first,
then
I
will
say
yeah,
okay,
so,
regarding
the
priority
marian
see
in
order
to
make
any
p4c
or
bmv2
changes,
we
really
need
the
p4
file
right.
Then
only
you
can
see
what
changes
are
required
from
compiler
or
bmv
to
simulator
perspective.
Right
I
mean
you
mentioned
about
you're.
Making
some
changes
in
the
bmv
too.
Is
that,
regarding
what
like,
I,
I
didn't
get
quite
get
that
part.
G
Which
item
are
we
talking
about
the
bmv
two?
You
mentioned
right
marian
in
the
beginning,
you
are
working
on
the
simulator
part
right.
C
Yep
he
has
a
hard
stop
and
eight
minutes
to
go
ahead.
H
Yes,
yes,
so
it
was
mentioned
as
a
prerequisite
for
that
contribution
that
we
need
to
have
a
skill
set
of
compiler
background
and
bmw
code.
So
how
much
compiler
background
is
needed
for
modifying
the
p4
p4c
code?
So
the
effort
that
are
needed
in
these
projects
are
more
related
to
bmv2
modification
itself
or
it
is
like
mix
like
we
have
to
know
the
background
of
bmv2
plus
p4c,
because
we
are
doing
internal
ramp
up.
D
Oh
so,
actually,
if
you
look
at
the
comment
section,
there
is
a
scope
for
each
item,
so
it's
as
if
it's
either
the
changing
the
p4
code
itself
or
it's
changing
the
p4c
code.
So
from
from
that
scope
you
can
figure
out
which
area
it
needs
more
attention
and
more
background
in
so
if
it
says
p4c,
then
you
need
to
be.
You
need
to
get
familiarized
with
p4c
code.
If
it's
bmv2,
I
think
bmv2
items
are
mostly
assigned
to
to
nvidia
already
so.
D
The
p4,
like
our
our
dash
pipeline
code,
which
requires
only
getting
familiar
with
the
p4
language
itself,
or
there
are
some
items
that
need
you
to
to
get
into
p4c.
So
in
the
scope
it
says
about
every
item,
what
you
need
to
be
familiar
with.
F
Yeah,
can
you
hear
me
yeah,
yeah,
so
christina
as
part
of
the
email?
I
also
wrote
that
I
shared
my.
C
C
Yeah,
I
will.
I
will
definitely
do
that
after
this
meeting
mohamed
okay,
thank
you.
I
will
do
that
and
then
what
will
happen
is
you'll
receive
an
invitation
and
then
it
may
ask
for
two-factor
auth,
which
then
got
m
told
me
you
might
fail
a
couple
of
times,
but
eventually
it'll
work
and
then
I'll
have
you
in
there.
E
Just
just
a
quick
question
on
this
project
view
christina
as
you
assign
the
assignees
to
the
items
yeah.
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
C
E
C
Right:
well,
thanks
everyone,
if
there's
no
more
questions
muhammad
I'll,
get
to
yours,
you
know
in
the
next
couple
minutes
here
and
thank
you
for
everyone.
You
know
offering
up
and
volunteering,
and
we
don't
have
to
make
this
a
weekly
meeting
unless
you
guys
feel
it
needs
to
be,
or
would
you
we
could
check
in
over
email
as
well,
which
do
you
guys
prefer.