►
From YouTube: .NET Design Review: WinForms Task Dialog
Description
A
B
E
A
A
A
I
F
A
E
A
D
Right
and
then
your
heart
yeah,
but
the
question
is:
if
the
user
can
do
it
with
the
just
put
by
placing
the
HTML
it's
so
right,
I
mean
it
was
like
obviously
like.
If
the
developer
like
puts
the
program,
let's
start
I
mean
you
can
do
anything
but
like
if
a
string
is
coming
from
the
internet
and
you
can
do
program,
would
start
that's
being
on
sketchy
kind
of
like
minimizing.
There
is
what,
if
we
do
it
elsewhere,
like
I,
guess
it's
fine.
G
A
A
E
J
I
B
A
F
You
Consulting
done
done
extremely
great
some
job
documenting
and
putting
the
demo
together,
putting
all
these
sort
of
these
document
together,
a
just
when
I
look
to
that
I
guess
these
some
personal
opinions,
obviously
to
my
experience,
will
be
informs
all
the
years.
But
few
things
I,
guess
I'd,
like
I,
guess
a
third
opinion
upon
whether
we
need
to
change
anything
to
make
it
more
than
80
or
more
with.
L
F
F
H
The
first
version
which
I
had
done
was
that
I
do
not
have
h
clause,
but
instead
I
had
the
properties
directly
in
the
dialogue,
and
you
could
set
the
properties
here.
But
the
problem
then,
was
that
when
you
wanted
to
update
text
at
some
point,
you
have
to
set
the
property
and
then
wholesome
up
in
Medford.
H
Use
one
of
the
uses
even
I
need
to
make
a
separate,
separate
class
which
contains
all
the
contents
of,
and
then
you
had
some
current
contents
property
on
the
hospital,
and
you
can,
you
can
now
add,
as
a
properties
of
the
page,
which
means
in
that
dialogue
is
currently
displayed
will
operate
at
X
or
if
you
want
to
navigate
to
a
different
page.
You
can
set
this
contents
property
on
this
page
protein.
It
is
correct
now,
but
the
concept
of
the
navigation.
H
And
but
I
feel
when
we
pass
this.
This
show
method
is
brought
as
a
broken
coiler,
which
means
it's
it's
us
not.
It
will
only
be
done
when
the
dialogue
is
closed
and
if
you,
if
you
pass
this
page
instance
in
the
show
me
that-
and
it
seems
like
this
page-
is
used
for
the
whole
lifetime
for
the
Velo.
But
actually
it
is
only
the
first
page
and
then,
if
you
navigated,
this
first
batches.
A
The
one
question
I
have
is
wind
forms:
they
have
this
like
it's
the
intention
that
you
only
use
these
api's
from
code
or
is
it
because
they're
in
root
forms
they
have
this
in
the
wind
forms
designer
they
have.
This
idea,
that's
tray
at
the
bottom,
but
we
can
beckon
drop
components
like
a
sequel
connection,
for
example,
and
then
you
can
configure
that
guy
effectively
entirely
using
the
property
to
it
right.
A
So
I
could
imagine
that
you
take
the
TAS
dialog
thing
put
it
in
the
component
tray
and
then
use
the
property
grid
to
configure
you
know
all
the
pages
and
then
basically
in
the
in
the
code-behind
of
the
form.
You
would
just
say
you
know:
dialogue
dog
show
whatever
right,
in
which
case
I
think
the
idea
that
you
configure
it
by
a
properties
and
you
effectively
minimize
the
number
of
arguments
passed
methods
would
make
a
lot
more
sense
in
this.
You
know
design
that
driven
approach
right.
You
know
what
I
mean
I.
D
F
D
F
D
F
So
my
sort
of
argument,
or
here
or
position,
is
that
from
it
kind
of
feel
logical
that
by
clicking
about
them,
navigating
or
setting
next
page,
as
opposed
to
navigating
navigate,
is
more
like
a
web
browser
concept,
and
so
navigation
felt
a
bit
odd
here.
So
that's
why
I
came
out
set.
The
next
page
is
like
what
I'm
setting
in
the
next
page
here.
D
H
H
It
starts
immigration
immediately,
but
it
does
not
finish
because
and
then
you
set
the
space
property
that
dialogue
already
credits
when
you
controls,
but
it's
it
still
has
the
old
controls
and
then
the
message
loop
continues.
Then
a
dialogue
will
actually
finish
this
navigation
and
display
new
controls
and
create
basically
saying.
D
A
Yes,
we
understand
it
isn't
even
even
here
science,
the
page
property,
he
calls
the
windows.
Api
is
the
basis
says
display
next
page,
but
this
is
happening
by
draining
the
event
pump.
So
then
the
next
line
executes
well.
It
has
like
the
UI
may
not
have
been
refreshed
yet
right
available.
You
may
have
to
make
away
the
things
like
this
before
that
happens,.
F
A
Yeah
I
mean
they
both
have
the
same
problem,
though
right
like
how
does
the
user
know
that
by
the
time
the
next
line
executes
the
previous
operation
has
not
been
completed
yet
or
may
not
have
been
completed
yet
right
like
even
if
you
make
it
a
method,
I
mean
unless
you
called
it
like
I,
don't
know,
start
transition
or
something
that
implies
that
you
know
yeah,
you
kick
it
off,
but
you
mean
it
may
not
be
completed
by
the
time
the
method
returns.
You
know
what
I
mean.
H
Yes,
the
event
occurs
when
the
pair
not
finished
a
vacation
and
all
of
the
controls
are
not
displayed
you
just
and
end,
but
universe.
This
also
means,
for
example,
if
you
set
the
page
property
and
in
the
next
line
you
want
to
update
the
text
of
the
page.
It
does
not
yet
work
because
it
you
will
have
to
wait
until
this
great
event,
of
course,
and
then,
when
we
went
to
Kirsten,
you
can
modify
that
okay.
A
B
F
B
E
A
E
E
A
A
K
H
Okay,
so
this
diagram
shows
that
when
you,
when
you
show
the
pyro
by
calling
the
show
method,
then
the
first
event
in
the
current
implementation,
the
first
event
will
be
the
open
event
of
the
dialog
and
then
directly
afterwards
created
the
event
of
the
page
will
be
raised.
But
then
this
happens
the
first
time.
It
means
that
I
look
is
not
yet
visible,
but
it
has
already
created
all
the
controls
and
then
then,
after
the
balloon
of
the
therapy,
conceivable
shown
you
can't
really
quite
of
that
possible.
H
And
then,
sometime
later,
if
you
set
this
page
property
to
navigate
the
para
log,
then
this
this
settle.
We
directly
called
this
the
destroyed
event
of
the
current
page,
and
then
it
will
store
navigation
and
when
the
dialog
has
completed
navigation,
meaning
it
has
created
the
controls
then
created
the
event
of
the
mix
of
listening.
Pressure
will
be
raised.
D
D
H
F
F
D
Are
destroying
the
page
one
before
you
create
the
second
page,
and
it
feels
to
me
like
you,
should
be
destroying
the
page
one
after
you
already
shown
the
page
two,
because
I
could
otherwise.
You
have
like
this
gap
in
between
like
where
nothing
it's
kind
of
alive.
So
if
the
user
kind,
of
course
the
like
uses,
the
current
page,
they
might
I,
don't
know
like
get
into
like
really
which
state
where
they
don't
know
what
they
are
actually
changing.
Is
that
like
white
concern
or.
H
Between
the
time
between
the
destroyed
event
of
the
first
page
and
created
event
of
the
same
age
between
this
time,
you
cannot
modify
the
dialogue
because
any
changes
would
be
lost
because
it
is,
it
still
is
in
the
process
of
navigation,
and
this
is
why
I
based
that
destroyed
event
directly
whence
not
in
navigation
and
then
sometime
later
created
event
of
the
second
page.
This
race.
D
H
And
set
this
H
set
I
would
not
wait
on.
It
would
only
erase
the
destroyed
event
and
then
it
will
return
and
only
and
then
you
copy
also
be
written
and
then
the
message
loop
continues
and
then
the
some
internal
events,
arrests
in
that
dialogue,
which
finished
navigation
and
then
at
this
time.
This
credit
event
of
the
next
page.
A
A
Basically
before
pages,
just
looking
at
the
names,
I
would
expect
I
get
a
created
event
raised
for
all
pages
and
then,
when
the
don't
pleat
dialogue
is
closed,
I
first
get
the
destroyed
event
for
every
single
page
and
then
I
get
a
closed
event
for
the
whole
dialogue.
I
would
not
expect
to
get
created
and
destroy
it
as
I'm,
navigating
between
pages
like
I,
think,
that's
why
well
closing
I,
say
closed
and
open,
or
whatever
the
kind
of
advice
that
this
is
happening
multiple
times
in
reaction
to
switch
I
guess.
D
The
question
is
like:
can
you
reuse
the
state
you
pass
to
the
page
I
mean
like
that,
whatever,
like
the
thing
was
called
the
style
of
page?
Can
you
use
the
instance
of
that
between
the
sukkah
example,
like
you
have
two
instances
of
the
pages
and
then
kind
of
set
them
like
alternative
like
basically
one
after
another,
or
is
it
not
possible
I
think
going
back?
Basically,
like?
Can
you
display,
like
page
1,
page
2,
page
1,
page
2,
like
kind
of
like
one
after
another,
but
can
you
reuse?
The
same
instance.
Can?
D
G
Exactly
like
to
like
just
to
the
transfer
form
itself
right
and
closing
or
closed
I'd
like
to
at
least
have
that
comparison
between
them.
It's
like
one
point.
You
know
if
it
differs
which
it
does
slightly
I'm
sure
a
bit
like
from
the
good
terms
that
are
there
like.
Just
have
that
start
with
that
and
then
say
why
we
can't
use
that
right.
F
G
A
A
question:
if
you
look
at
tap
tap
control,
for
example,
it
doesn't
have
events
on
the
pages.
It
only
has
events
on
the
tap
control,
which
is
deselected
and
deselecting,
and
selecting
and
selected
which
basic
gets
raised
on
the
tap
control.
As
your
toggling
between
multiple
pages,
there
will
be
another
way
to
model
it.
So,
instead
of
having
events
on
the
page,
it
would
have
any
only
an
event
on
on
the
tossed
dialogue
itself.
That
basis
tells
you
that
the
page
has
changed.
H
Which
you
might
do
a
Lodge
on,
but
in
this
case,
if
you
have
the
events
in
the
past,
I
welcome
its
tonight
be
harder
to
create
political
instance
of
a
page
because
it
you
need
access
to
the
past
and
I
complement
this
with
my
page
dialogue
example
I
in
this
in
progress,
page
I
used
I've,
been
in
from
this
time
up
and
the
page
is
created
and
destroyed.
The
time
I've
been
the
page
is
destroyed
and
for
this
I
was
using
this
credit
and
destroy
dimension
on
the
page.
H
A
I
think
you
would
write
similar
code,
it
would
just
be
instead
of
saying
in
Provence
Pedro
created,
you
would
say
times,
dialogue
dot.
You
know
page
change
and
you
would
say
if
e
dot
active
page
equals
in
progress
page
and
then
in
under
than
if
you
have
all
the
code
that
you
currently
have
under
the
created
from
the
in
progress
page
right.
H
A
A
E
D
E
A
But
but
if
you
do
that,
then
I
think
it's
important
that
we
try
to
avoid
methods,
but
then
it
needs
to
be
basically
properties.
You
can
set
most
of
the
time.
That's
what
I'm
asking
like.
If
you
have
to
call
methods
to
set
things
up
and
you,
then
you
really
can't
use
the
property
grid.
For
that.
That's
the
whole
point
where
WinForms
is
most
of
the
time,
just
a
bunch
of
properties
and
then
method.
E
F
F
A
F
For
design
thing,
if
we
did
design
each
individual
page
but
leave
the
semantics
of
wiring
these
pages
between
themselves,
that's
appropriate
outside
a
designer
may
be
one
thing
if
we
want
to
design
the
whole
experience
and
to
end,
including
all
the
tents
and
bindings
in
the
design,
it's
a
different
thing.
Yeah.
F
A
Yeah,
that's
what
I
would
think
I'd
I
mean
thank
you,
but
you
would
basically
just
set
up
the
pages
with
the
configuration
and
then
the
only
thing
you
would
have
in
code
is
effectively
the
flow
between
pages
right,
which
kind
of
means.
If
you
want
to
do
that,
then,
ideally
you
want
to
have
probably
events
per
page,
because
that
means
you,
you
don't
have
to
write
like
complicated.
A
F
We
can
go
both
ways
you
can
have,
you
can
expose
it
cents
per
page,
like
Constantine
suggested,
say
a
page
shown
or
page
create
and
page
closed
right.
We
can
handle
each
individual
page
specifics
and
you
can
have
at
the
task
tile.
A
cleverly
can
have
page
changed
or
whatever
index
change,
we
can
say
they
can't
active
page.
Is
this
and
you
can
handle
it
that
way
as
well?
That's
true.
A
That's
why
I'm
kind
of
asking
like
how
do
we
expect
people
to
use
it?
But
if
you
expect
most
usage
by
our
code,
then
I
think
that's
very
different
from
if
you
try
to
say
well,
I
accept
people
to
drag
and
drop
it
after
I
log
on
to
the
component
tray
and
then
they're,
configured
of
the
property
region
and
they're
only
basically
wired
up
by
a
quotient.
That
leads
over
to
different
directions
and
that's
kind
of
why
I'm
asking
like
what?
How
do
you
see
this
work
right.
H
A
You
think
the
designer
makes
more
sense
for
stuff
where
you
have
a
huge
variety
right
and
I
guess
it
depends
on
how
complicated
the
dialogue
ends
up
being
right.
If
you
have
pretty
much
a
standard
like
okay
use
it
as
a
better
message
box
with
maybe
the
checkbox,
it
says,
don't
show
again
or
something,
then
you
know
that's
two
lines
of
code:
we're
probably
used
to
static
methods
anyway,
and
then
you
know
as
it's
more
complicated
as
I'm.
Adding
more
pages
and
I
have
more
interactions.
A
A
Mean
the
nice
thing
with
the
task
dialogue
is
I
mean
they
building
dialogue
is
always
annoying
right,
like
you
have
to
put
the
buttons
in
the
right
spot,
make
them
the
right
size
and
cut
them
too
right
away.
You
have
to
write
margins
and
blah
blah
blah
I,
don't
like.
If
it's
just
ten
clicks
in
the
designer,
then
it's
too
faster
than
me
building
an
actual
custom
form
right,
but
yeah
I
mean
I
mean
I
would
probably
use
this
one
if
I
can't
ever
if
I
could.
A
So
another
question
would
be
like
this
is
like
a
decent
amount
of
classes
right.
It's
like
what
20
30
classes,
something
I,
probably
gonna,
claim
yeah
30
classes,
maybe
looking
at
the
existing
namespace,
it
doesn't
look
like
WinForms
has
a
lot
of
namespaces
and
the
root
name.
Specimen
formulary
is
pretty
crowded.
F
Has
broken
into
multiple
bits
and
pieces
right,
so
is
it
something
we
won't
consider
for
win
homes
as
well?
So
this
is
a
brand
new
control
on
its
own
right.
Is
it
something
we
may
want
to
do?
We
want
to
release
it
a
separate,
so
people
can
just
install
a
new,
get
packaged
and
use
it.
It
is
appropriate.
F
G
A
Got
some
points
I
mean
my
question
is
generally
speaking
like,
like,
like
I
would
generally
default
to
say,
like
from
components.
Go
where
the
platform
component
already
is
so
like
my
default
would
be.
If
you
build
a
new
button,
for
example,
I
would
expect
it
to
be
insistent.
Windows
Start
form
store
DLL
unless
there's
a
reason
why
it
shouldn't
right.
So
one
of
the
reasons
might
be
it's
very
large.
It's
only
used
by
a
few
customers,
maybe
there's
benefit
of
putting
in
a
different
binary.
But
then
the
next
question
was
okay.
A
E
E
D
I
E
A
A
good
point
right
so,
let's
say
I'm
in
WPF
and
then
I
just
need
to
toss
dialogue
divided
using
two
system
of
windows,
not
forms
I,
get
like
hundreds
of
types,
some
of
which
conflict
with
the
name.
Never
you
carefully
in
spaces
like
user
control
or
button
or
whatever
right,
and
so
the
question
is
in
that
wall
that
might
actually
better
off.
If
it's
not
I
get
business,
I've
never
witnessed
art
forms
just
to
me,
PFF
its
own
message
box.
It.
I
A
M
Although
they
didn't
do
the
orientation,
they
did,
they
still
just
wrapped
an
agent's
message:
boss.
Okay,
that's
why
I
know
so
like
they
nobody's
going
to
be
using
the
existing
message
box
from
WinForms
for
WPF
apps.
They
don't
have
to
yeah.
They
don't
have
to
quite
frankly
like
if
they
do
with
them
and
probably
by
accident.
A
C
A
C
F
L
A
A
G
F
A
G
H
A
A
G
G
A
A
Suggesting
yeah
I
mean
to
me
that
I
don't
know
enough
about
how
common
dialogue
works
it
to
me.
It
looks
like
an
implementation
help
her
more
than
anything
for
the
common
controls
where
you're
expected
to
effectively
override
run
dialogue
that
covered
about
win32
API.
You
want
to
call
to
show
the
dialogue
that
may
or
may
not
make
sure
it's
for
you
for
your
stuff,
because
it's
wired
up
differently
but
I
think
I'm
a
user
standpoint.
It
probably
would
be
sensible
because
it
is
a
common
dialogue,
but
that's
logically
what
it
is
and
okay.
F
J
D
F
Another
thing
here
we're
with
the
with
the
dialogue:
if
you
use
the
standard
buttons
you
get,
the
dialogue
result
similar
to
what
you
get
in
the
message
box,
whether
they
click
yes,
no
cancel
cetera.
But
if
you
click
on
the
on
the
custom
button,
you
get
a
custom
button
as
a
return,
so
we
sort
of
have
a
duality
here
to
what
we
may
get
as
a
result
and
I
know
they
will
be
to
consider
what
we
can
do
here
as
well.
L
F
H
If
it
returns
this
beside
unum
and
up
with
the
instance
shown
method,
it
is
possible
to
additionally
usual
custom
buttons
and
then,
if
passed
by
Republicans-
and
there
are
surprises-
one-
is
this
dialog
and
this
button
also
history
site
as
property
and
the
other
one
is
a
custom
button.
So
my
intent
was,
but
when
you
call
the
insertion
method
and
you
can
have
post
any
patents
and
custom
and
anything
which
returns
the
base
class,
so
you
can
check
if
this
instance
is
actually
a
stand
apart,
own
custom,
you.
H
H
A
Believe
them
I
would
just
have
one
class
for
the
task
dialog
button.
It
just
has
two
constructors
one
takes
the
text
and
won't
take
the
human
and
then
maybe
of
a
property
that
exposes
the
enum,
and
maybe
it's
not
at
all.
When
you
use
the
text
and
it
doesn't
have
one,
let's
say,
because
I
don't
know
why
you
would
differentiate
between
after
them
like
I.
A
Think
if
you
think
home
dialog
standpoint,
you
show
the
dialog
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
the
only
thing
you
care
about
is
like,
which
are
the
four
buttons
that
I
gave
the
user.
The
user
ended
up
clicking
on
right.
So
probably
just
compare
the
instances
of
the
button
I
created
like
if
I
like,
if
I.
If
I
mix
them,
then
I
will
probably
just
use
instances
and
if
I
only
have
standard
buttons,
then
I
probably
just
use
the
inner
mobile
loads
anyway,
and
then
it's
also
fine
right
there.
So
just
aesthetically
helper.
F
L
A
A
H
Think
a
colleague
of
me
had
heavy
suggestion
to
to
to
have
a
collection
of
pages
and
then
dialogue
could
implement
with
navigation
automatically.
But
first
a
look
is
not
it's
not
like
episode
where
you
have
a
next
and
previous
page,
but
you
have
a
specific
pattern.
For
example,
start
action,
so
I
think
I,
don't
know
if
it's
possible
to
have
such
a
collection
too,
so
that
I
look
and
this.
A
F
Well,
in
a
time
and
the
tab
control
having
a
pages
property
which
exposes
all
the
pages
in
the
tab,
control
sort
of
makes
sense,
because
you
can
see
all
this
pages
and
you
can
interact
with
all
them
in
the
task
dialogue
or
in
the
dialogue.
You
have
a
single
page,
you
can
interact
with
and
this
dialogue
offers
functional
or
if
you
be
able
to
switch
between
pages.
But
you
still
have
a
page,
only
a
single
page
to
interact
with,
and
that's
what
I
suppose.
Eh
probably
provides
you.
F
F
H
H
I
A
F
These
two
levels
here
sejuani's
at
the
dialogue
it
sells
so
where
it
may
be
getting
Amenti
comments
here,
like
you,
know,
having
again
traffic's
like
dialog,
open
to
dialog,
close
and
page
open
to
page
closed
dialogue
page
closed.
If
I
don't
know,
that's
which
way
do
we
want
to
go
here
and
you
have
a
two
page
level
yeah,
whether
whether
it's
appropriate
or
not
or
inappropriate,
to
have
at
a
page
level.
That's
a
great.
A
F
A
D
A
It's
me,
it's
like
I
know,
I,
actually
don't
care
so
much
about
the
actual
name.
All
I'm
saying
is
that
the
the
the
the
the
corresponding
type
to
dial
to
toss
that
leg
would
be
for
me
to
just
pick
whatever,
whatever
event
corresponds
to
whatever
hopefully
does
I
would
not
invent
a
new
name
for
that.
I
guess
would
be,
but
honestly,
don't
know
whether
there
is
a
corresponding
one,
but
if
it
exists
we
hope
we
should
use
that.
One.
F
F
F
A
B
D
F
F
A
A
Keep
in
mind
that
people
don't
understand
default
radios,
so
that
is
something
so
just
in
the
abstract.
The
signatures
that
you
have
for
show
are
completely
reasonable
to
me,
like
I,
have
zero
concerns
from
a
you
know:
yeah
all
the
things
optional
I
can
set
them
in
any
order.
If
I
use
NATO
arguments,
it
looks
nice
I'm.
What
about
that?
The
only
thing
is.
We
know
from
usability
studies
recently
that
people
fundamentally
don't
understand
default
parameters
like
they
did.
They
don't
know
that
they
can
omit
them.
A
F
A
Well,
I
mean
let's
back
up
for
a
second,
so
so
we
have
talked
about
default
parameters
and
the
VCL
division.
Gangnam
was
we
don't
use
them
at
all,
but
then
we
had
a
very
lengthy
discussion
where
the
compiler
team
about
how
we
would
version
them
compatibly,
and
we
are
pretty
confident
that
we
know
how
to
version
them
in
a
compatible
fashion.
So,
for
example,
let's
say
you
want
to
add
another
parameter.
The
way
you
would
do
that
is,
you
would
add
an
overload
to
show
that
adds
the
parameter
at
the
very
end.
A
Then
the
previous
version
of
show
you
make
everything
non
defaulted
and
then,
in
the
new
overload,
you,
you
add
the
default,
so
that
means
source
code
wise.
It's
never
breaking
changed.
Always
we
compile
it
in
the
same
way
and
it's
not
a
binary
breaking
change.
So
that's
basically
our
I'm,
sorry,
the
the.
So
that's
the
version
of
concern
addressed,
but
the
usability
concern
remains
because
yeah
people-
just
don't
don't
know
but
I
guess
in
in
this
case,
most
of
the
time
even
they've
done
everything.
It's
not
bad
and
the
null
is
equivalent
to
string
computer.
D
H
D
A
This
is
this:
is
a
child
already
I
suppose
my
f-secure?
Yes,
this
is
the
instruction
here
and
then
this
is
the
depth.
Yes
yeah.
Yes,
yes,
so,
like
I,
just
hooked
up
home
message
box
shows
in
WinForms,
you
first
specify
the
text
and
then
the
title,
which
is
which
is
exactly
the
way
it's
currently
in
the
API,
is
here
as
well.
So.
A
F
A
L
F
L
L
D
A
E
F
The
link,
if
you
go
to
the
linked
up
to
the
win32
tasks
dialog,
you
know
actually
has
the
image
which
points
to
every
piece
of
text
on
the
screen
and
explains
what
water
out
correlates
to
each
parameter
yeah
we
may
be
able
to
just
seal
it,
so
that
comment
number
nine.
If
you
take
that
up,
it
figures
that
link
I.
L
L
L
E
A
F
A
I
A
A
F
F
H
A
What
would
you,
but
that
goes
back
to
like
it
seems
big
way
and
we're
like
I,
would
like
if
you
do
what
I
suggested
earlier,
I
would
just
expect
to
have
a
TAS
dialog
icon
class.
It
is
more
abstract
and
just
has
a
constructor
that
takes
an
icon.
It
seems
more
logical
than
having
an
implicit
operator
that
converts
from
an
icon
to
another
icon.
A
F
F
F
F
F
H
Is
in
the
past
dialogue?
Normally,
when
you
click
any
button
automatically
closed,
but
in
some
cases
you
don't
want
to
post
the
dialog,
but
for
example,
and
want
to
show
the
next
page
you
have
to
cancel
at
all
in
the
negative
API
respect
by
returning
true
or
false
value
from
the
correct
angle,
and
so
I
made
this
green
box
kinds
of
clothes.
That
said,.
F
Okay,
but
then
we
have
a
task
dialogue,
closing
even
tags,
which
are
presume,
is
used
when
tasks
dialog
closing
event,
so
after
thinking
so
feel,
central
I
clicked
on
the
button,
I
get
an
event
touch.
Dialogue
is
attempting
to
get.
Who
is
closing
and
I
go,
don't
close
and
carry
on.
How
do
you
know
which
button.
D
E
F
A
F
D
A
A
F
H
F
D
A
I
mean
it
kind
of
depends
on
how
you
want
to
do
this
right,
I
think,
logically
speaking,
the
property
to
say
don't
close
make
sense,
but
at
the
same
time,
clearly
you
need
to
have
a
click
handler
for
that
button
anyway.
So
because
the
button
has
to
do
something
right,
let's
say
you
want
to
open
the
website
or
something
right,
and
so
you
just
think
you
just
edit
click
enter
for
this
button,
and
then
you
basically
just
say:
well,
you
know,
I'll
execute
some
URL
or
whatever.
A
I
E
N
E
F
A
D
D
A
A
D
F
D
F
H
F
A
A
F
F
D
D
F
Think
it'd
be
Constantine
had
in
one
of
his
iterations
as
possible,
enhancements
it
to
in
enhance
a
target
task.
Dalek
results
are
ex
email
to
have
like
a
custom
member
and
say
you
task.
Dialog
result.
If
you
click
on
the
custom
button
returns,
Utah
Dalek
result
dot
custom
and
then
you
can
inspect
the
Dalek
result.
Property
which
leads
to
your
custom
button.
For
instance,
yeah.
F
From
common
dialogue
and
the
current
API
Amidala
Capshaw
dialect
result
Dalek
result
you
sort
of
can't
reach
on
the
custom
button
here.
Why
enhance
by
adding
an
extra
member
to
dialogue?
Result
numeration
just
a
custom,
you
can
say:
hey
user
clicks
on
the
custom
button,
so
I'm
returning
your
Dalek
result
of
custom
and
go
inspect
your
cast
the
Dalek
residual
property
to
find
out
what
user
actually
clicked.
That's.
A
A
A
F
Personally,
from
what,
from
my
side
as
a
reviewer
and
recipient
of
that
API
review,
I
think
there
is
sufficient
comments
generated
for
for
us
to
have
another
round
of
Aki
tweaking
and
massaging
before
I
guess
presenting
it
for
second
round
of
API
reviews.
We
can
have
another
one
in
the
farm
concert
in
what
do
you
feel
I?
Don't
want
to
steal
your
thunder.
It's
your
show,
absolutely.
H
B
I
A
Like
over
names,
a
lot
like
the
one
thing
and
try
to
do
with
almost
all
the
API
is
it's
like
I
know
how
mathematicians
work
like
you,
try
to
remove
all
the
noise
and
try
to
distill
it
down
to
and
as
simple
as
the
format
as
possible.
So
if
we
can
remove
the
types
and
condense
them
down
further,
that's
always
goodness,
because
it's
less
concept,
calm
for
the
user
right.
F
And
once
we
accept
that
they
will
be
set
in
stone.
So
if
we
I
guess
make
a
mistake
now
or
not
think
of
something
yeah
we
should.
We
may
be
trying
to
yeah
babe
in
pain,
yeah.
Just
to
reiterate
it's
it's
an
awesome
job.
Might
we
all
absolutely
ecstatic
and
excited
to
incant
wait
hold
out
to
be
polish
and
be
accepted
in.
B
N
A
Scenarios
here
and
Constantine
probably
also
has
some
thoughts,
but
I
think
the
booty
is
really
to
study.
We
should
definitely
check
the
statics
right,
the
the
one-liners
like
the
TAS
dialogue
dog
show,
but
the
problem
is
five
arguments.
I
would
I
would
certainly
test
the
you
know:
custom
buttons
and
and
clickhandler
things
to
see.
You
know
people
figure
this
out
and
then
just
see
what
people
are
getting.
B
A
I
would
I
would
say
the
people
that
we
gave
today
I
think
probably
takes
you
know
a
few
days
for
them
to
think
about
right.
Every
season,
for
example,
as
I
said
like
the
one
thing
you
should
think
through
is
the
is
the
idioms
and
the
classes
whether
we
can
collapse
them
down.
Somehow
right
now,
I
only
rode
out
the
icon
at
the
button,
but
there's
probably
others
with.
It
also
applies
at
the
progress
blog
progress,
bus
state,
I,
don't
know
that.
A
That's
the
same
thing
or
not,
once
you
think
you
are
like
kind
of
where
you
want
again.
I
will
do
the
study
because
chances
are
when
you
get
the
study
results
back.
It's
not
necessarily
actionable.
There's,
probably
some
things.
You
need
to
discuss
and
say:
okay,
what
do
we
think
is
the
section
about
the
sweater
that
way
right
so.
B
B
A
B
A
A
Well,
given
the
both
eager
and
Konstantin
a
bit
more
time
might
mean
that
they
can
actually
be
only
actually
on
the
accessibility
review
as
well.
I
mean
they're,
Luke,
they're
they're
recorded
right,
so
we
can
know
the
result,
but
it's
it's
generally
interesting
to
see
somebody
use
your
API
in
the
struggle
for
twenty
minutes.
You.
A
A
A
All
right,
then
I
have
much
more
I
will
I
will
I
will
publish
the
notes
later
I
will
I
will
respond
to
the
the
PR
that
is
in
progress
right
now
or
the
sort
of
the
issue
that
it
was
already
filed
with
the
review
feedback
and
then
I
think
yeah.
You
guys
have
to
decide
when
you
want
to
think
is
ability
to
study,
although
I
can
drive
that
yeah.