►
From YouTube: .NET Design Review: Nullable Annotations
Description
-02:-47:-50 - Approved: Add protected SecurityDescriptor to ObjectSecurity https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/35993
E
B
H
B
B
J
H
Well,
if
we've
documented
that
no
means
empty
string
enough
butts.
C
B
Go
with
that
to
like
otherwise
he
would
said.
If
so,
if
the
time
would
have
been
the
tab
string
is
optional,
you
would
just
defaulted
it
to
default.
Tab
string
right.
Well,
that's
not
the
case.
We
just
read
it
does
now
and
let
me
just
effectively
vide
an
empty
string
by
the
sheer
fact
that
you
know
if
you're
passing
out
to
these
guys
here,
just
of
nothing.
G
C
L
F
C
M
H
H
D
J
B
B
But
presumably,
when
you
said
it,
I
wouldn't
be
surprised
if
you
also
reset
it
off
now,
so
it
seems
yeah,
it's
probably
bad
API
design
and
somebody
would
bring
a
new
API
I'd
like
to
do
a
public
doesn't
love
to
do
it,
but
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
think,
there's
enough
evidence
to
say
we
need
to
change
that
behavior
and
not
people
the
other
way
and
cause
it
back
there.
You
know
it's
one
warning.
H
K
H
B
H
K
G
J
K
H
C
B
A
L
L
B
L
B
L
D
C
K
K
A
O
O
B
C
C
C
It's
probably
90
pickles,
but
how
is
different
from
text
by
the
right
line
now,
because
the
text
right
there
nice
into
the
string
right
basically
can
not
write
anything
that
a
software
you're
writing
to
define
what
you
don't
write
anything
we
write
tonight,
0
a.length!
It's
you!
Don't
us
in
the
time
to
be
what
I
like
it.
H
I
F
H
F
H
C
K
B
B
L
L
D
D
H
K
D
B
L
L
H
B
L
F
L
B
You
thinking
I,
always
faster
in
core
after
Jeremy,
took
the
spaghetti
and
made
it
something
that
is
not
that
bad
yeah
I,
think
acid
and
held
that
copay
yeah.
This
one
I
have
to
say
like
get
erect
your
name
like
I
used
to
shopping
for
a
while
that
had
inaudible
annotations
and
that
always
bucked
me,
because
it's
super
common
to
call
go
back
to
your
name
and
it's
basically
now
enough,
like
you,
always
have
to
guard
against
it.
That
is
annoying.
B
B
Part
of
the
reason
why
I
think
they're
inconsistent
is
because
you
could
never
see
them
before
like
unless
you
literally
could
look
at
the
code.
What
kind
of
happen
right
now,
my
consistency
is
only
something
there
if
anybody
actually
looks
at
them
thing
and
says
how
great
this
is
now.
This
is
not
now.
This
is
weird
work
in
another
case,
it
falling
make
sense.
B
B
B
L
Combining
for
dotnet
framework
thanks
to
three
or
for
it
throws
if
any
of
the
inputs
are
known,
the
one
that's
grabs
throws.
If
the
array
is
null
for
any
of
the
members
of
same
football
mine
says
No
but
presumably
joined
exceptional,
because
it
just
caused
that
span
of
rooms
almost
like
and
in
every
bomb
in
action.
G
G
K
B
I
mean,
strictly
speaking,
it
is
Quinn
right
like
if
you
would
use
the
right
directory
character
and
you
just
join
them
with
at
the
exact
same
area
when
that
sends
I.
Don't
think
it's
super
surprising
that
no
just
becomes
a
normal
when
you
have
redundant
slashes,
but
no
normal
less
than
the
way,
usually
no
one
potentially.
K
C
A
K
K
K
K
C
B
B
D
D
J
L
B
C
C
G
L
B
H
H
O
L
Was
the
bug
had
an
off
by
one
in
there,
so
it
was
nie,
but
they
tried
printing
the
expression
that
caused
the
null
rent,
but
they
had
an
off
by
one
in
where
they
were
doing
the
dot
operation.
So
we
did
like
a
dot
B
dot,
C
and
B
was
no,
but
it
would
say
a
is
no,
not
an
object.
This
wouldn't
worry
if
it
was
a,
but
that
was
no.
It
hadn't
built
the
expression.
D
B
H
F
H
N
H
L
B
L
L
A
I
G
B
C
C
L
D
B
H
H
B
Joking,
like
did
I
mean
there
are
some
issues
with
their
minimal
connections
like
the
noodle
array
is
pretty
good,
I
mean
to
a
dictionary
we
kind
of
messed
up
should
have
they
had
tied
that
it's
similar
to
mutable
array,
everybody
said
modifications
will
basically
do
a
full-blown
copy,
because
right
now,
every
time
I
look
up
in
the
dictionary.
It's
basically
a
tree,
walk
rather
than
an
I
should
look
up.
O
H
B
H
C
K
B
B
K
B
B
B
B
B
H
And
you
make
a
we
don't
dictionary
or
dictionary
where,
where
kia
is
an
into
question,
even
like
you
never
pass
small
to
it,
but
they
are
into
questions,
because
if
we
did,
where
t
is
a
key
is
not
null,
that
would
mean
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
create
a
question
an
into
question
addiction,
and
just
please
I
would
think
you
can.
As
long
as
you
don't
pass
null
int
right,
you
can
pass
boss.
C
C
H
M
H
D
H
H
O
B
B
B
B
I
B
H
H
D
C
D
H
C
H
H
B
M
A
M
K
H
I
I
K
K
D
O
O
K
C
H
H
You're
you're
doing
spectra
you're
going
through
a
whole
bunch
of
different
none,
unrelated
memory
addresses,
and
so
it's
even
a
good.
O
O
D
B
O
K
K
B
K
G
G
A
K
O
O
K
B
P
You
do
have
audio
both
and
teams
meeting
and
I
think
also
on
YouTube.
It.
B
B
B
A
B
O
H
J
G
G
O
H
C
G
A
C
O
B
K
H
H
H
H
H
K
B
You
because
it
unfortunately
there
is
a
bunch
of
other
meetings
that
I
or
others
have
to
go
through
then
I
constant
up
at
the
time
that
I
want
I
can't
do
Monday
morning,
because
that's
when
Stephen
has
his
repo
structure
working
group
set
up
and
to
choose
them
want
me
to
didn't
already
have
an
interview
you
can
do
when
someone,
because
it's
an
Lda
movie
I
can't
do
Thursday
morning
because
it's
not
going
to
live
streaming
is
and
I
can't
do
Friday,
because,
thankfully
there's
a
p.m.
well
I've
been
starting
anything.
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
B
G
O
D
B
P
P
B
H
G
B
B
B
B
K
B
B
B
B
B
H
G
H
D
N
H
B
B
B
H
Amazing,
it's
like
again
what
type
of
distribution
is
that
it's
like
there's
a
few
there's
a
canoe
or
were
a
few
reference.
There's
a
few
assemblies
with,
like
all
the
API
everything
well.
B
Boy,
it
wasn't
like
this
original
night,
like
with
the
fact
that
phantom
is
not
so
big
has
to
do
with
the
fact
that
we
had
like
we
originally
moved
a
bunch
of
stuff
out
and
then
I
make
sure
we
had
to
move
a
bunch
of
stuff
back
in
order
to
be
compatible
with
the
past
right,
like
the
faction
pulled
in
a
bunch
of
stuff
go
put
in
a
bunch
of
stuff.
But
the
sad
thing
is
it's.
The
first
pass
that
we
have
finished
out
with
the
attributes,
basically
to
revisit
them
all
again.
D
B
I
B
I
might
do
if
ever
you
were
going
to
edit
or
now
so
I
can't
do
that
anyway,
all
right
guys
online
thanks,
Joe
I,
think
I'm
hanging
up
now.