►
From YouTube: .NET Design Review: JSON Writer
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
D
So
we
have
one
constructor
on
the
district
rider
and
it's
a
generic
type,
so
it
can
take
it
except
I
prefer
a
road
bike
and
the
constructor
takes
in
T
buffer
rider
and
the
day
star
is
state
and
the
reason
for
the
state
is
so
that
if
you
need
to
save
something
across
AC
bodies,
you
have
that
in
to
get
the
state
and
pass
it
back
to
us.
Now
the
a
factory
methods
fix
what
we
have
with
support.
D
It
puts
the
stream
and
it
has
a
memory
of
bite,
but
not
Stan,
because
we
cannot
have
an
internet
penetration
of
span
that
implements
the
interface
that
we
need,
but
we
can
have
eternal
screen.
Implementation
have
memory
based
implementation
of
I
prefer
either.
So
we
can
write
writing
today's
six
bike,
riding
adapted
BK.
No,
the
helpers
desk,
a
pepper
for
now.
Now
the
rider
gives
you
properties
the
properties
that
he
can
access.
This
give
you
information.
Both
them
is
my
in
the
other
way
is:
what
is
you
cannot
depth?
D
The
other
is
current
state,
which
is
what
you
need
to
access
and
give
back
to
us
when
you
cross
state
boundaries.
Just
like
a
read
it
right
and
then
you
have
talked
it
typed
as
well.
Now
some
of
these
may
be
a
necessary
in.
There
are
riders
context,
even
though
I
sort
of
mashed
it
with
the
reader
for
parity,
for
example.
You
don't
necessarily
need
to
know
the
takatak
call.
You
just
know
it,
but
if
you,
if
you
call
so.
E
D
F
D
D
Is
it
let's
take
something
completely
opaque
so
again,
just
like
the
reader
state,
which
exposes
things
like
max
that
and
bytes
consumed?
You
need
this
as
well.
Well,
my
second
option
quality
that
you've
already
given
to
us.
The
only
one
that
you
I
guess
asking
is
budgeting,
and
that
is
if
you
need
to
know
how
much
here
it
is
so
to
advance
the
async
time
so
again.
Lightly
really
does
the
same
thing
as
necessary.
So
the
reader
has
bison,
assume
and
sequence
position,
because
it's
supposed
to
be
only
sequence
as
well.
This.
D
That
would
be
I
know,
explore
all
the
trade-offs
with
that.
If
that,
given
there
how
behind
this
cycle,
there
would
be
change
that
we
have
to
make
on
both
and
leadership
for
p1
if
I
were
to
make
it
I'll
making,
both
or
now
on
keeping
it
Bellator's.
If
you
have
opinions,
if
you
strongly
believe
it
should
be
an
SEO
type.
E
E
It's
kind
of
like
you
know:
we
don't
screw
this
time.
It's
not
I
think
it
depends
like
what
names.
Please
do
we
put
this
type
in
system
taxation
and
where
are
we
gonna
put
serialize
it
also
this
type,
so
this
kind
of
business.
We
should
think
about
this
one,
because
I
assume
that
jason
serializable
will
be
very
commonly
used
at
some
point
and
then
we
hope
do
not
have
the
whole
namespace
pollute.
It
was
very
complicated
types
that
are
by
reps
and.
E
One
thing
we
could
do
is
either
kind
of
you
know
separate,
very
advanced
types
by
namespace
or
make
some
of
them
nested
and
then
maybe
there
are
not
that
many.
If
it's
just
you
know,
Jason
serialize
and
Jason
right,
the
reader,
it's
simple
now,
but
if
it's
Jason
serializer
regularly
there
in
twenty
five
virus
sharks
around
this,
then
it
kind
of
gets
to
be
so.
G
G
They
don't
have
anything
utf-8
in
their
public
members,
but
they're
entirely
tracking
is
utf-8
like
his
bike
position
and
stuff.
So
since
we
don't
expect
anybody
ever
to
read
them,
just
read
the
property
and
pass
it
back
as
an
opaque
thing.
It
probably
should
just
move
to
messed
it
and
okay
them.
So
just
take
that
as
a
breaking
change.
So.
E
D
D
D
G
H
G
G
D
I,
don't
know
if
the
granularity,
where
we
give
you
the
ability
to
customize
how
much
indentation
you
need
to
do
all
the
white
space
between
:.
But
now
will
it
know
yes
is
necessary.
Yesterday,
I,
don't
even
have
it
so
first
to
have
the
minimum
feature
set
and
it
already
go
against
that
interest.
Now,
the
other
one
where
we
don't
care
do.
Why
was
the
Dom
had
done?
That's
something
we
could
consider,
but
I
don't
know
if
that.
F
H
Annette
people
have
been
quite
happy
with
the
default
way
and
then
taken
happens.
So
I
only
have
one
set
under
the
only
time.
I've
ever
had
equal
ask
more
options
as
they
have
an
array
that
only
has
one
item.
They
don't
want.
Let's
spread
across
multiple
lines,
because
by
default
or
will
they
put
an
open
array
tag
it'll
put
a
new
line
or
prevail.
You,
you
know
print
another
new
line.
You
know
from
the
closing,
but
that's
that's
pretty
hard
to
do
when
you're
writing
a
port.
H
E
The
guidance
applies
to
parameters
not
to
properties.
Properties.
I
was
thinking
about
this
I,
but
my
thinking
is,
let's
say
the
property
is
called
3d
printing,
you
know
pretty
print
by
default,
it's
false
and
then
you
can
set
it
true
and
we
choose
some
pretty
print
format
and
then
we
want
more
pretty
pretty
fun
format.
Well,
we
just
add
another
field
and
it's
called
now.
You
know
how
do
you
want
to
pretty
print
and
then
we
had
an
enum
and
then
you
can
select
so.
G
G
K
F
E
D
H
Do
make
the
mean,
don't
call
it
for
matter.
L
G
H
Iii,
don't
know
how
terribly
common
it
is
for
people
to
change
it,
but
I've
noticed
with
them
don't
net
land
we
tend
to
indentation
by
two
spaces
and
address
heavens
might
be
because
that
was
chasing
donates
to
fold,
but
I
think
any
other
programming,
languages,
environments,
you
see
Jason
and
then
to
4
spaces.
I,
don't
know
anyone
had
that
as
an
option,
but
I
think
that
is
something
people
would
want
more
control
over
rather
than
the
individual
spaces
after
combat
something
like
that,
we've.
B
Pretty
much
all
pretty
printers
I've,
seen
like
I
mean
the
same
is
to
have
indented
text.
Wherever
that
code
on
is
using,
they
have
an
indent
level,
and
then
they
have
a
curl
level.
What
character
do
you
threaten
or
what
string
your
friend
like
is
the
two
spaces,
one
tab,
the
two
tabs
two
spaces
and
three
tabs
I
mean
you
can
configure
any
conservation
at
that
point,
you're
taking
so.
D
G
B
Such
customization
I
mean
this
is
one
of
those
things
it's
similar
to
the
to
the
sterilizer
right,
where
it's
unclear
like
what
is
the
good
trade-off
between
per
friend
and
customize
it.
But
it's
a
right
I
mean
given
a
Jason
or
netizen
that
you
specify
the
thing
today:
I'm,
okay,
with
just
starting
with
two
spaces
and
see
what
happens
to
it.
We
know
people
complain,
but
no
exactly
that's.
H
G
K
B
D
This
certain
opinion,
opinions
or
policy
that
the
writer
makes
and
that's
why
I
want
to
focus
on
next,
so
one
of
them
is,
should
it
support
a
match
that?
And
if
so,
what
should
be
that
Mac
step
now
the
current
policy
is
based
on
technical
limitation
and
the
policy
states
that
you
cannot
go
beyond
seven
three
million
as
your
depth
and
you
cannot
write
a
property
that
is
larger
than
one
gigabyte
and
you
can
order
add
a
value
string
or
that's
not
as
a
monkey,
no
money.
D
So
those
are
three
technical
limitations
that
make
the
rider
have
this
discussion
say
if
you
are
gonna
write
more
than
70
million
depth.
I
won't
write
hydro.
If
you
can
write
a
property
name,
that's
not
the
Montego
bike.
I'll
go
write!
Intro!
If
you
write
a
value
exercise,
I've
got
a
string,
that's
larger
than
wondering
about
my
anthro.
F
D
Example,
the
reader
has
a
cause
of
max
depth
and
it's
default
to
64
and
similarly
for
either.
If
you
are
accepting
random
input,
let's
say
in
the
memory:
the
user
don't
know
what
depth
it
is.
They
may
want
to
set
a
default
and
the
security
of
suggested
that
we
should
set
a
default.
The
default
could
be
CD
4,
it
could
be
1000,
it
could
be
whatever
noble.
B
D
Not
just
for
sharing
and
psychology,
so
what
is
it
the
media?
Doesn't
it's
not?
It
doesn't
have
a
match
step
for
stato
fluids
for
untrusted
data,
then
the
sea
lice
or
this
lizard
could
act,
get
access
to,
and
that
is
really
usually
read
under
the
covers
and
therefore
it
has
no
way
to
talk
to
the
tell
the
reader
through
again,
you
see
something
in
a
spectacular
that
you.
G
A
back
step
just
because,
as
it
keeps
going,
you
keep
pushing
things
onto
a
stack
which
means
it
stacks
eating
memory.
So
your
your
untrusted
data
is
potentially
just
over
consuming
the
Mauryan
causing
me
to
Alec
and
me
now
can
fragment
your
memory
space.
Let
the
disabled
between
potentially
individuals,
without
your
isn't,
writing
untrusted
data
writers
doing
what
someone
programmatic
control
them
to
do
and
they're
on
the
inside
of
the
code
instead
of
the
outside.
Okay.
Well,.
B
Also,
like
you
just
stream
data,
what's
the
difference
between
me,
I
can
be
completely
flat
and
wide
like
the
on
simple
properties
that
each
other
on
cane,
slides
and
I
do
this
a
million
times.
You
would
never
block
that
right
right,
which
is
when
I
started
nesting
them
you
care,
but
as
far
as
nesting
is
concerned,
the
only
thing
you
do
is
you
you
add
what
two
more
bites
to
my
output.
Nice
thing
so
like
in,
like
I,
think
the
the.
B
For
the
most
part,
you've
already
validated
data
I
know
you
write
data
that
you
already
trust
and
if
you
don't
trust
that
you're
writing,
then
something
wrong
in
your
code
to
begin
with,
but
even
if
you're
right,
untrusted
data
I
mean
like
I
like
what's
the
what's
the
behavior
difference
right,
you
just
write
a
tiny
amount
of
more
data,
but
the
problem
is
really
an
accommodator.
Do
you
write
person
other
side,
you
just.
D
N
G
Christoph,
what
the
actual
contract
of
I
buffer
writers
supposed
to
be
because
I
was
discussing
earlier,
but
that's
on
it's
essentially
if
indentation
is
on
and
now
you
start
running
into
questions
of
like
how
many
spaces
are
going
to
need
to
be
between
now
and
when
you're
done.
And
can
we
ever
talk
about
that
much
memory
and
at
73
million
the
answers
turns
into
no
so.
D
Even
with
this
constraint,
the
concern
is
I
want
to
make
me
reduce
the
cherry
Ness
to
the
interface,
the
IPOP
rider.
So
what
I
wanna
do
is
I
wanna
whenever
you
can
use
right
on
making
property
value
our
rider
in
one
shot,
which
is
give
me
the
span
that
says
two
gigabytes
and
then
all
right
already
right,
if
you
so
asain
break
about
to
be.
D
You
know
why
I
said
is:
you're
sorry,
three
mil
million
depth,
which
is
some
some
size,
a
one
gigabyte
of
property
name,
one
thing
about
of
value:
we
can
change
the
distribution
of
it.
They
probably
intend
to
be
smaller,
and
then
this
way
I
can
ask
for
two
gigabyte
array
and
right
holliman's.
If
we,
if
we
say
no,
there
should
be
no
limit,
then
I
would
say
is
give
me
to
be
wide
array
all
right.
All
the
indentation
there
for
now
there's
no
level
of
depth.
D
The
depth
limit
isn't
into
a
mask,
then
give
me
another
2,
Giga,
Drain,
all
right.
The
2gig
property
now
give
me
another
to
be
again
I'm
ready
to
give
value.
So,
to
avoid
having
to
do
these
three
calls
on
these
checks
every
on
every
common
case,
I
said:
okay,
I'm
only
right,
I'm,
only
gonna
ask
where
data
ones,
the
upward
buffer
ones,
give
it
to
give
me
a
holler
over
tiny
on
my
submission
he
comes,
you
could
come
too
early
large
amount
and
right
right
do
it.
D
D
E
D
E
G
D
F
D
G
D
D
D
F
D
D
Would
write
a
code,
it
would
break
quote
backslash
quote
so
a
previous
to
previous
API
review,
where
this
conclusion
was
that
property
names
are
known
to
be
escaped
and
you
get
all
about
that.
We
can
assume
to
be
mbnr
when
I
escaped
them,
but
install
business
k,
plan
use
and
if
somebody
wants
to
escape
property
names,
we
have
provide
there's
helpers
to
escape
for
you
right
now.
Either
we
provide
the
helper
on
the
static
class.
We
have
the
factory
methods
which
is
going
skip.
D
E
D
E
H
D
A
D
That's
not
discuss
about
a
flash,
so
as
part
of
bleeding
you
can
try
writing
you
keep
writing
and
then
after
you're
done
writing
you
call
flush,
always
in
the
middle.
If
you
think
you've
written
a
lot,
you
call
flush
before
we
did
have
this
primary
call,
this
one
hot
dog,
every
didn't
do
any,
where
I
usually
just
flush
whatever
we
had
before
it
now.
The
question
is:
should
we
add
a
spinal
block
and
validate
at
that
point,
a
pageant
said
to
say:
are
you
and
I?
Have
you
entered
all
your
objects?
Are
you
at
depth?
E
D
E
E
B
E
D
E
B
D
Motivated
because
it's
not
just
that
because
we
have
gesture
or
value
option
so
I
feel
have
an
if
check
for
that.
So
I
split
my
code
up
in
a
fast
path.
He
says:
don't
format,
SQL
Edition
and
that's
the
thing.
I
have
plans
for
most
go.
That's
I
think
the
most
common
504
series
right.
So
otherwise
we
have
to
do
the
ifs
check
on
redress
for
men
or
for
my
excavator.
So
as
they
operate
for
any
case
and
then.
E
E
Well
because
it
space
as
I
said
they
passed
me.
Some,
like
you
know,
enhance
and
things
organized
there
are.
There
are
parameters
that
the
user
passes
me
based
on
the
parameters
which
are
not
like
strings
that
I
just
right,
I
built
the
JSON,
so
I
mean
total
control.
I
know
that
it's
not
just
you
know
it's
all
escape,
it's
all
ASCII
and
its
own
good
yeah.
So
why
did
you
want
method
level?
F
B
Point
like
dude,
so
how
often
do
you
think
you
have
to
unwind
this
deck
entirely
anyway?
What
do
you
mean
by
artist
so
I
mean
we
understate
right,
so
the
it's
a
restaurant
right
it
is.
You
have
to
unwind
the
stack
and
reconstruct
that
like
if
that's
something
that
happens
at
national
boundaries
anyway,
you
effectively
get
a
new
instance.
If
you
will
I.
E
Like
that's,
what
I
initially
asked
why
we
even
have
a
state
for
the
writer
I
can
imagine
cold
nittany
needing
it,
so
I
think
we
should
have
it,
but
so
far
all
the
JSON
that
I've
seen
that
we
will
have
to
write
for
I
mean
the
other.
Sdk
is
just
once
not
sure,
but
I
mean
they
are
like
you
know,
they're
small
takes
on
payloads
based
on
some
parameters.
Some
you
know
passed
from
the
user
and
some
weaker.
We
kind
of
know
like
if
the
service
call
needs
to
do
this.
E
E
D
E
So
it's
stored
in
the
understand
it
still
doesn't
change
the
fact
that
it
could
be
a
property
under
idle,
so
mainly
after
having
said
that
I
just
realized,
we
would
rule
this
discussion.
There
are
kind
of
two
validation
things.
One
doesn't
make
sense
to
be
turned
off
like
you
either
wants
to
validate
that.
You
know
that
the
brackets
corollary
and
the
second
one
is
validation.
Whether
the
names
are
inscribed
right.
If.
D
G
Code
is
written
right.
It
is
right,
correct,
isn't,
but
someone
is
going
to
do.
The
oh
I'm
gonna
write
the
helper
method.
That
goes
and
writes
this
thing.
They're
gonna,
write,
start
object,
they're
gonna
do
some
stuff
and
then
they're
gonna
write
invalidation,
it's
much
more
dot
Medi.
If
we
throw
the
exception
that
says,
you
thought
you
were
done
and
nothing
made
sense
instead
of
wait
for
the
reader
on
the
other
side
of
the
wire
to
say.
B
Because
I
mean
I
would
say,
if
you
I
mean
most
people,
don't
write
Jason
by
hand
right,
they
traversed
some
data
structure
and
that
it
means
at
some
point
in
their
code
that
forgot
this
thing
rights
which
no
means
well.
You
may
be
able
to
fix
it
up
in
some
cases,
but
I
definitely
have
a
box
somewhere
lurking.
So
I'd
rather
I'd,
rather
get
a
consistent
error
every
single
time
at
the
right
spot,
rather
than
oh
here
it
work,
but
over
there
at
broke
exact
value.
E
E
G
D
E
I
still
agree
with
Jamie.
There
are
some
things
that
are
costly
to
validate,
like,
for
example,
whether
my
string
is
escaped
its
oh
and
operation
yeah,
and
then
there
are
things
that
basically,
the
validation
is,
or
one
like
you,
comparing
two
things
do
I
have
the
same.
That
am
I
inside
an
array
at
which
point
if
we
have
a
setting,
it
may
be
equivalent
to
just
doing
the
validation
checking
whether
the
setting
is
own.
D
Q
D
E
D
G
G
D
The
whole
point
was
I'm,
not
using
the
stack
at
all.
My
daddy
is
off
divided
on
either
side.
My
man
is
on
I
need
a
Stephanie,
so
aside
from
the
home
and
property
validation
of
his
escape
money,
which
is
actually
super
fast
if
popular
short,
which
is
why
I
was
saying
to
the
plane,
is
20%
most
of
it's
not
coming
from
the
skipping.
My
name
is
Jack.
It
was
a
Vectra
index
of
search
on
10,
wide
array
of
element
n.
Is
there
pushing
a
power
of
the
stand
and
the
multiple
gift
checks
on
the
ponies?
D
G
D
N
B
D
B
H
E
Structural
validation
seems
to
be
like
something
that
you
initialize,
the
you
know
when
you
can
start
the
day
right,
it
just
doesn't
make
sense
to
switch
it
on
individual
rights.
The
other
one
is
only
possible
alright,
so
it
seems
like
they
would
be
two
different
things
property.
So
two
different
settings.
D
E
Meaning
me
well,
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
feel
super
strongly.
I,
don't
know
how
performance
I
could
win
by
basically
changing
it
between
calls
right,
but
wouldn't
the
default
by
in
your
case
be
turned
off
well,
I
did
the
default
would
be
I
turned
off,
but
then,
from
time
to
time,
I
have
a
string
that
I
got
from
the
like.
The
user
asked
me
to
do.
My
mathematicians
have
a
matter
of
I
spy.
D
E
G
Wondering
if
it
should
be
the
like,
we
can
put
it
as
a
parameter
here
to
become
what
we're
concerned
about
is
the
the
property
names
you
could
have
yeah
the
the
tailing
optional
parameter
of
a
saving,
true
or
false,
because
really
it
feels
to
me
like
we
shouldn't
be
assuming
property
names,
are
legal
like
we're,
taking
a
string,
we're
taking
a
string
from
a
dotnet
concept
and
we're
moving
it
into
a
jason
concept.
We
should
not
assume
that
the
caller
speaks
Jason
like.
G
D
G
F
D
A
I
think
back
I.
Think
if
we
go
back
to
this,
like
validation
doesn't
make
sense
of
putting
names,
you
either
write
them,
trust
it
or
your
auto,
escape
right.
Then
I
think
we
don't
put
it.
If
the
expectation
is
you
want
to
split
it
and
I
think
you
need
to
have
a
method
that
it
does
not
contain
a,
but
otherwise
the
colon
has
to
allocate
some
magic,
some
and
copy
it
over
again,
which
seems
weird,
which
case
I
think
all
this
cable
is
honestly
the
thing
that
gets
a
lot
of
most
really
yeah.
E
G
H
D
What
the
store
they
get
both
comes
back.
The
fact
is
neither
highly
tuned
and
optimized
for
performance
and
every
addition
chat.
We
add,
for
example,
get
asked
this
a
follow
me
utf-8
format,
a
parser
where
we
have
a
default
China
format
and
those
checks
have
to
follow
us
too.
Much
to
the
point
where
someone
who
watch
you
office,
whatever
you.
E
F
G
D
G
A
little
weird,
because
most
of
the
things
that
you
can
write
don't
have
things
that
need
to
be
escaped
right,
like
all
the
numeric
overloads
right
there.
The
only
thing
that
can
be
processed
is
the
property
name
in
some
way
until
you
get
to
the
like
right
string,
it's
like,
oh
then,
for
the
property.
This
means
two
things.
D
So
the
idea
is,
we
also
provide
a
write,
poverty,
API,
and
that
has
the
bowl
coupons
for
skipping
that
environment
and
that
way,
people
who
don't
know
what
I
don't
know
about
interest
rate
data
values,
that's
low
API
and
they
break
up
the
right
poverty
right
value
and
anyone
who
knows
interview
those
possibly
has
at
most
like
value
right
now.
How
much
does
it
like
there's.
B
G
D
B
G
E
Work
so
I'm
thinking,
for
example,
I'm
in
this
meeting,
so
I
would
know
how
to
use
this
API
that
you
just
described
I'm
now
thinking
about
ordering
all
the
engineers
on
not
on
core
effects
team
but
like
in
you
know
our
SDK,
we
would
have
to
like
explain
to
them
like
there
are
these
two
ideas.
They
are
very
different
ways
of
writing
properties
when
you
write
the
property
and
the
other
one
you
ran
over
at
some
time.
What
is
you
know,
validates
one
does
in
which
one
validates
which
doesn't
it's
not
super
clear,
yeah.
D
G
P
G
D
E
D
F
F
H
I,
don't
think
a
property
on
the
reader
I
mean
the
writer
would
make
sense
if
you're
using
a
criminal
perspective
of
the
serializer
when
you're
writing
it.
When
you're
using
a
serialize
or
and
sterilizing
objects,
it
can
be
a
mix
of
objects
where
you
know
the
property
name
is
safe,
but
people
could
also
have
dictionaries
inside
there
are
kicks,
and
in
that
case
the
the
values
of
the
daquiri
keys
are
coming
from
user
by
to
find
data
and
you'd
want
to.
It
want
to
continue
to
escape
those
values
so
I
also
I.
G
B
An
otherwise
yeah
the
restaurant
I
know
you
better
cause
the
whole
thing.
They
wrap
all
the
time,
because
this
truck
space
yeah
look,
this
one
is
not
it,
they
do
so,
honestly,
I,
don't
think
it's
the
big
thing
and
I
think
what
what
James
said
is
much
more
important,
because
if
you,
if
you
think
about
recursive
traversal,
be
data
structure,
their
basic
no
means
everybody.
In
order
to
stay
safe,
while
you're
gonna
write
for
them
on
property,
you
would
always
have
to
set
the
the
you
know
the
beautiful
variable
on
the
reader.
D
L
D
Additional
parameter
actually
so
to
adjust
your
cursor
of
your
point
about
ease
of
use
and
disturb
lady
gestured
or
net,
has
a
like
operating
with
name
the
method
and
right
value.
So
we
could
have
that,
and
these
accelerators
are
only
five
of
us,
there's
really
no
yeah
but
see.
This
is
I,
think
the
difference
right.
It
depends.
B
On
when
you
look
at
the
method
yeah,
you
were
assuming
it
because
they're
they're,
combining
the
value
and
the
property,
then
from
the
caller's
point
of
view
today.
This
is
the
high
performance
API
versus
a
convenience.
Api
I
would
honestly
say
if
I
see,
method
effects
to
that
to
be
the
second
convenience
over
the
ground.
E
Like
I
perform
a
green
also
also
I
would
say
that
I
like
this
much
more
than
what
you
describing
enjoyed
about
that,
because
in
case
of
that
net
a
he
is
I'm
thinking
so
I
write,
property
name
do
I
need
to
write
that
column
now
right
and
then
the
value
yeah
IP,
which
is
right
here.
It's
like
super
clean,
a
clear,
so
you
know
from
from
kind
of
you
know
what
API
I
will
prepare.
I
would
refer
this
one
with
an
overload.
Okay.
E
Now
you
answer
think
that,
like
there's,
some
performance,
cost
and
I
would
say.
Maybe
there
is
short,
we
should
at
some
point
measure
and
I
kind
of
understand,
there's
some
time
right
now,
so
I
would
just
first
do
the
ones
that
just
stayed
the
boolean
and
then
in
the
future.
If
we
want
to
improve
performance,
you
can
always
spend
those
that
don't
the
times
in
the
boonies
have
differed
on.
The
boolean
would
have
a
default
five
years
and
the
default
value
should
be
I'm.
H
F
G
G
G
D
G
A
G
D
G
B
D
E
D
B
G
G
Really
that
it's
right
property
and
not
right
array,
it's
about
the
particular
value
of
the
property.
It
not
the
arrangement
same
thing.
The
iranian
is
about
the
value.
So
maybe
all
these
may
be
right.
Array
should
be
right
property
and
then
there
should
be
all
the
complicated
overloads
of
all
the
properties.
So.
D
E
D
E
B
The
name
you
see
here
is
not
the
dotnet
type
name,
it's
the
it's.
What
kind
of
jason
value
are
you
writing
and
agent
on
the
Jason
side,
there's
only
so
many
lines,
and
so,
if
so
backed
up,
if
you
have
an
overload
for
double
well,
then
you
still
buy
the
number.
If
you
write
it,
okay
and
one
thing
I
still
write
it
as
a
string.
Is
it
I.
G
Would
expect
all
right
there
everything
to
be
called
right
value
and
it
has
an
optional
extra?
What
is
the
name
of
this
or
all
the
things
that
are
currently
write
value
would
be
overloads
of
this
that
are
missing,
because,
if
I
see
right,
number
and
write
value
and
I
have
a
number
like
I
can
figure
it
out
by
the
colleague
of
one
of
them
takes
a
property
name
of
the
other
one
doesn't
but
I,
don't
think
the
API
shape
lends
itself
to
saying
right
number
is
if
you're
ready,
really
married
promontory,
so
you're
saying.
G
B
E
G
E
D
B
Name
is
arrested
last
time.
People
said
exactly
that
it's
a
property
name
yeah,
but
I
mean,
if
you
have
a
string
property
I,
don't
know
what
else
it
would
be.
That
seems
very
good
and
it's
shorter
and
anyway,
if
your
property
in
your
video
I
mean
there's
only
so
many
ways,
you
can
interpret
that
and
I.
G
G
B
B
K
O
J
J
E
E
Name
is
the
second
parameter
is
very
strange,
so
I
would
not
do
yeah
I'm
just
saying
the
the
problem
that
will
result.
If
we
combine,
you
know
right
value
and
right
string
or
number
is
that
now
that
parameter
or
there
would
not
be
consistent,
I
think
that's.
That
seems
fair,
though,
because
I
don't
think
that
suppose.
G
E
E
And
I
also
there's
another
thing
that
I
don't
like
about
them
being
overload.
They
have
two
different
things:
I'm,
like
I'm,
doing
two
different
things:
I
mean
the
writing
properties.
I
am
writing
values
like
what
I
want
to
write
something
I,
don't
know
yet
works.
I'm,
gonna,
just
type
right
number
and
then
decide
what
to
write.
But
these
are
the
only
two
things
invited
to
it
and
it
seems
like
it
fair.
G
E
E
E
G
Think
having
that
the
destination
or
the
transport
type
be
in
the
name
is
important:
I
think
that
it's
right
string,
right,
string,
property
and
because
then
the
method
group
is
the
overload
layer.
They
tells
you
the
concept
things
and
the
overload
is
the
different
kinds
of
things
that
we
can
turn
into
strings.
One
of
them
is
about
writing
a
string.
What
about
writing
during
probably
otherwise
it's
right
value
and
right
property?
Well,
you
could
also
just
say.
B
E
G
D
D
G
G
You
might
be
completely
messing
up
the
notion
of
should
the
next
thing
be
a
closed
square
bracket
or
a
closed
curly,
and
then
it
says,
like
you
messed
with
the
data,
while
I
wasn't
looking
I,
don't
care
versus
this
one,
which
is
there's
an
operation
you
might
want
to
do.
I'm
just
gonna
write
in
the
documentation,
I,
don't
care
what
you
do
here.
It
make
her
up
to
my
state
and
so.
D
N
B
Doesn't
solve
the
problem,
though
I
like
the
problem
is
still
like
if
the
guy
like,
if
I,
think,
honestly,
though
the
guy
that
can
actually
say
I,
write
some
payload,
this
thing
sure
they
can
add
some
curly
braces
that
closes
things
before.
But
why
would
you
do
that?
So
in
its
in
principle?
Yes,
you
can
match
up
the
state,
but
it's
more
like
well,
I,
probably
have
to
admit
a
comma
here.
I
probably
have
to
admit
some
stuff
and
then
yeah.
B
G
G
E
E
D
P
Could
have
written
it
open
quote
you
didn't
terminate,
you
could
have
written
an
open
curly.
This
one
is
basically
no
matter
what
we
do.
It
can
mess
up
right.
Yes,
no,
like
it
can
message.
So
my
question
is:
does
that
belong
on
this
type,
or
is
that
the
you
can
access
the
writer
directly?
Do
whatever
you
want.
B
Do
do
it's
clear
that
I
don't
know
because
I
mean
it.
You
still
have
to
have
some
notion
of
saying
contract
of,
like
my
bike
or
this
method
or
if
I
go
to
another
Lang
buffer
and
write
directly
well,
what
do
I
have
to
do
to
make
sure
that
when
the
reader,
when
the
writer
continues
I'm
in
the
same
stage
like
well,
this.
D
D
E
B
All
I'm
saying
is
that
go
step
further
and
say,
like
just
enumerate
the
things
that
can
happen,
because
the
main-deck
depression
is
add,
not
sure
you
need
the
state
thing.
I
think
it
might
be
okay
to
say
well,
depending
on
when
you
call
this
method
or
when
you
call
it
in
the
line
right
ER,
if
you're
the
beginning
of,
if
you
just
wrote
a
property
name
by
itself,
okay,
I
drove
it.
It
is
a
video
if
you're
doing
this
after
the
array
was
opened.
B
B
You're
not
supposed
to
put
the
closing
bell
if
you
numerate
those
rules,
I
think
it's
like
as
long
as
we
convince
ourselves
and
that's
the
same
assumption
that
the
caller
can
make
then
I
think
it's
fine
to
say
as
long
as
you
pull
up
this
contract
go
to
the
airline
thing
and
write
this
thing
in,
but
without
that
I
think
it's.
If
we
don't.
G
B
What
I'm
saying
is
they?
So
if
you
encourage
this
as
the
as
the
in
case,
you
need
to
write
some
chase
and
that's
what
you
should
do.
The
question
is:
do
we
think
we
can't
support
this?
We
got
a
cell
phone
and
call
it
call
it.
Does
it
whether
they
call
this
method
or
whether
they
vote
in
the
language,
but
so
otherwise
I
would
say.
If
you
go
to
the
underlying
writer
directly,
I
would
normally
say
you
just
you
just
violated
the
contract.
D
B
The
wait
wait,
this
method
would
work.
Is
it
the
same
way
that
the
original
version
of
the
my
property
name
would
be
like
you?
Just
you
just
send
documentation
here.
The
rules
you
have
to
follow.
I
have
no
way
to
and
I
have
no
way
to
enforce
them
and
I.
Don't
I
don't
check
them,
but
these
are
the
things
you
have
to
follow
so
that
things
can
work
period.
I'm
saying
you
just
have
to
enumerate
those
things.
I,
don't
think
we
have
the
list,
you
can
it's
just
it's
a
documentation
burden.
It
seems
good.
E
Saying
it's
a
design
because
here's
what
the
what's
happening-
I
I'm,
writing
some
Sam
Jensen
right
I,
know
what
I
am
correct.
Yes,
this
method
clearly
says
I'm
gonna
just
blast
this
by
it's
here
correct.
Then
you
know
you
may
potentially
keep
going
yeah.
What
rules
would
you
say
wouldn't
want
it,
but.
B
Say
let's
say
you
write
a
configuration
file
right,
you
right,
you're
at
the
point
where
you,
where
you
have
the
settings
and
an
object,
so
you're
saying
start
object
and
now
you're
pasting
your
JSON.
Yes,
if
you
call
start
object
before
you
call
this
method,
you
cannot
put
in
the
code
the
closing
curly
brace.
You
have
to
call
the
other
method,
because
otherwise
we
will
have
a
violation.
You
know.
E
B
G
Was
to
remember
obviously
clear
of
what
you
ask:
this
type
to
do
is
start
an
object
and
then
you
go
to
the
under.
Then
you
call
flush,
then
you
go
to
the
underlying
stream
and
you
do
some
stuff
and
then
you
call
end
object
or
you
call
plush
final
and
either
like
call
in
dabshe
quell
that
was
too
many
clothes
Curly's
and
now
the
read
on
the
other
side's
gonna
fail,
or
you
call
flush
final
and
says
you
called
start
object.
We
can
never
called
in
that
wreck.
What
did
you
do
when
you?
D
E
B
I
wish
I
would
do
a
step
further,
okay,
which
I
would
say
what
I
would
do
is
I
will
remove
those
API,
yeah
and
I
would
tell
people
don't
mess
with
another
line
writer
as
lonely
as
soon
as
you
tell
people
like
you
can
mess
it
in
a
line
writer.
The
owners
Inasa
numerate,
what
the
boundaries
of
that
contract
are
right,
which
is
more
or
less
the
same
thing
about
the
documentation,
would
save
with
this
method.
B
E
E
B
Because
Jeremy
said
you
would
remove
the
method
and
instead
help
you
put
to
go
ten
or
a
minor
I'm
saying
that
you
have
to
do
it
like
no
matter
where
the
method
is,
you
have
to
decide
what
the
rules
are,
so
that
the
resulting
system
is
sound
and
whether
you
make
where
they
can
tell
them
to
do
it
here
or
here
it
doesn't
make
a
difference
at
that
point.
I
would.
E
G
This
object
now
understands
you
wrote
something
and
says:
I
need
to
write
a
comment
now
before
doing
the
next
thing.
So
this
is,
you
did
nothing
and
that
violated
the
contract.
But
if
it's
you
go
to
the
underlying
stream
and
you
write
nothing,
you
did
not
violate
the
contract,
so
they
actually
differ
on
whitespace
and
who's
responsible
for
writing.
The
next
comma.
If,
if
he's
written
an
object,
if
he's
already
written
in
the
thing
in
an
array,
he
has
not
put
the
trailing
comma,
you
want
to
write
raw.
E
E
G
G
G
B
B
E
P
P
E
B
E
D
B
G
The
thing
that
would
be
the
most
transparent
and
easiest
to
write
and
also
solves
the
whitespace
problems
of
if
you
ended
up
just
calling
right
with
just
white
space.
So
now
now
our
type
is
generating
the
illegal
files
is.
If
the
answer
is,
this
method
does
nothing
other
than
write
directly
to
the
underlying
data,
and
if
you're
here
you
have
to
write
comma
three
and
then
you
do
not
put
a
trailing
comma
because
he
doesn't
understand
you
did
anything
after
the
tip.
His
sane
is
still
here.
E
L
L
A
B
H
D
B
D
B
E
D
P
E
D
B
B
G
And
and
since
we
said
right
now,
you
if
it's
called
right
value
of
this
and
there
right
value
raw
or
you
know
whatever,
then
this
means
I
need
to
write
down.
My
my
comma,
if
I
need
to
because
of
my
object,
state
and
I
am
assuming
that
you
did
not
write
white
space
or
nothing
because
white
space
and
nothing
are
not
values.
Yeah.