►
From YouTube: .NET Design Review: Quick Reviews
Description
00:00:00 - Approved: HttpRequestException w/ Status Code https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/911#issuecomment-584780389
00:12:10 - Approved: Make System.Security.Cryptography.Oid write-once (initializable read-only) https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/2043#issuecomment-584786046
00:24:32 - Approved: Expose the match length when using String.IndexOf in culture specific mode https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/27935#issuecomment-584799296
00:53:47 - Approved: Incremental Hash, allowing to continue to hash https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/1968#issuecomment-584806878
01:11:25 - Needs Work: Async parallel foreach https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/1946
01:22:43 - Rejected: BinaryPrimitives.ToLittleEndian / FromLittleEndian https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/29222#issuecomment-584820663
B
Yes,
so
this
proposal
is
to
extend
HTTP
request,
exception
contract
to
provide
direct
access
to
status
code
property.
It
is
important,
too,
it's
important
for
exception,
handling,
collage
ik,
when
we
want
to
when
people
want
to
analyze,
HTTP
response,
which
basically
were
it
properly,
but
contains
not
successful
status
called.
Currently.
The
only
way
for
them
is
to
check
HTTP
response
message
status
code,
but
it's
not
convenient
for
everybody.
Sometimes
people
use,
for
example,
if
you
ensure
suggested
status
code
method
to
troll
exception,
and
if
they
do
that.
B
Currently,
there
is
no
direct
access
to
status
code
property.
The
only
thing
they
can
do
currently
is
to
parse
to
stream
HTTP
response
message
to
string
text
which
contains
that
and
proposal
is
too
explicit,
is
to
expose
this
status
code
explicitly.
The
amount
of
change
on
the
code
side
by
condition
on
the
implementation
side
is
quite
negligible,
because
this
status
code
is
already
passed
to
HTTP
request
exception.
When
this
ensure
such
a
status
code
method
is
called,
but
it
just
passed
as
in
form
of
string.
B
D
C
F
B
Like
to
add
one
thing
that,
since
we
are
talking
about
the
case
when
response
was
received
properly,
I
mean
there
is
no
like
transport
issues
and
no
protocol
issues.
The
vast
contractor
are
basically.
If
we
use
only
one
of
the
rescue
truck
truck,
we
would
pass
in
the
exception
always
now,
because,
basically,
there
is
no
in
exception.
G
A
I
J
F
A
F
F
Parameter
constructor
with
the
we
could
leave
them
nullable
on
the
last
one,
just
so
that
the
implementation
can
be
cascade.
Is
we
just
need
to
look
the
question
mark
on,
though,
on
the
string
and
status
code?
One?
You
could
only
call
that
one
if
you
have
a
value,
if
you
maybe
not
welcome
about
you,
that
you
pass
null
for
it.
F
F
M
N
F
A
E
F
F
F
O
A
F
R
E
B
F
I
O
F
F
It's
just
a
tuple
of
two
strings,
but
the
two
properties
each
are
get
set
and
annoyingly
also
modify
each
other,
because
it's
a
mutable
value
anywhere
that
we
return
it
in
in
crypto
API.
We
always
return
a
copy
so
calling
things
that
look
like
simple
properties
are
allocating,
and
probably
things
that
look
like
simple
properties
that
are
complicated
structures
are
complicated.
Allocating
and.
F
Based
on
casual
evidence-
and
you
know
less
casual
evidence
of
like
looking
at
what
API
subnet
says,
the
number
of
calls
to
the
setters
on
these
are-
it
looks
like
almost
no
one
ever
actually
wants
to
set
them.
Most
people-
probably
don't
even
know
who
said
of
it,
and
so
the
proposal
is
to
make
them
not
be
settable
and
because
someone
could
be
doing
it
via
object,
initializers
right
now.
The
proposal,
instead
of
making
this
I
always
throw,
is
essentially
you
get
to
set
things,
and
then
it's
done
once
they
have
a
value.
F
F
F
These
as
immutable
things,
if
you're
talking
about
a
typical
factory
pattern
where
someone
we're
trying
to
sing
at
him
only
one
person
ever
initializes
of
in
the
first
place,
normally
within,
like
a
lazy
or
something
like
that,
so
I
wouldn't
think
that
we
wouldn't
need
any
type
of
manual
and
she
walked
in
here
like
what
we
like
in
the
platform.
We
would
start.
C
F
S
V
F
F
H
S
A
Have
the
question
is
just
how
we
how
we
make
sure
that
we
don't
break
the
walk
this
a
little
bit
like
no
I
I,
think
we
I
think
we
will
probably
land
in
a
spot
where
we
can
it's
just
on
the
question
of
like
I
was
just
accepting,
but
still
has
a
behavior
or
it
changes
your
life
right
there
like
I,
don't
find
it
actionable
to
say,
or
we
can
never
put
an
obsolete
attribute
on
property,
because
somebody
might
have
feel
like
that.
Well,.
S
A
S
S
A
S
A
A
F
Your
grand
plan
to
remove
the
setters
entirely
at
some
point
or
is
ultra-soft
usable
I
mean
I,
would
love
to,
but
that's
a
that's
a
binary
breaking
King
on
roll
forward
and
we
go
forward.
Isn't
our
you
know
p0
scenario,
but
it's
still
I.
Don't
think
that
the
that
that
break
is
worth
it.
Okay,
I'm
fine
with
the
object,
analyzer,
okay,.
F
The
only
thing
that
will
be
slightly
weird
on
it
is
right.
Now
we
have
a
bunch
of
places
on
the
platform
that
we
passed
null
is
the
friendly
name
of
the
constructor,
which
means
lazy
computed
in
the
getter,
which
means
we
need
to
now.
Not
do
that,
because
we
need
to
not
let
somebody
write
to
the
friendly
name
Center
before
we
lazily
computer,
that's
value,
but
that's
just
internals.
K
F
O
I
T
M
T
M
F
The
this
is
the
API
that
I
have
proposed,
adding
to
comparin
for
the
the
general
idea
behind
us
is
when
you're,
when
you're
calling
index
of.
Sometimes
you
need
to
know
how
many
characters
match,
especially
if
you're
doing
a
linguistic
match.
For
instance,
if
your
search
string
contains
literally
SS
and
you're,
searching
for
the
German
SF
character,
for
instance,
and
you're
doing
a
cape
or
you're
doing
a
culture
aware
match.
You'll
need
to
know
that,
even
though
the
esse
is
a
single
character,
the
string
that
it
matched
with
in
actually
had
a
character
white
house.
F
Otherwise,
when
you
start
doing
things
like
slicing
the
string
you're
going
to
get
your
bouncing
back,
there
was
a
little
bit
of
a
debate
on
the
API
has
proposed
here,
because
I
I
was
I
was
just
going
to
considering
returning
ranges,
saying
here's
where
the
match
began
and
here's
where
it
ended.
Within
the
original
string
there
was
an
alternative
proposal
of
natera
convention,
one
comment
below
which
was
saying
well.
F
Perhaps
we
should
actually
just
out
in
rather
than
out
ranges
for
certain
api's,
but
in
general
that's
what
it
would
look
like
and
then
once
we
get
the
api's
settled
on
compare
info,
then
we
can
figure
out
whether
it
makes
sense
to
do
it
on
the
string
as
well.
I,
don't
think
it's
that
important
to
do
a
long
string,
but
it
is
an
option
so.
E
F
Was
suggesting
that
specifically
for
free
person,
suffix
the
first
two
that
are
listed
there,
but
not
necessarily
the
last
year,
the
the
reason,
the
reason
that
I'm,
not
a
fan
of
adding
the
int,
is
that
it
makes
it
far
too
easy
to
discard.
Whereas
if
you
call
this
API
like
you
really
need
those
values,
you
shouldn't
just
discard
one
of
them
in
assume
that
you
knew
what
it
was.
That's
true,
buddy
existed.
What
is
it?
There
is
no
existing
one
there.
There
is
no
way
right
now
to
get
to
the
max
length.
F
No,
that's
what
I
mean
yeah
existing
one
is
index.
Oh,
that
doesn't
provide
actually
correct
and
there's.
There
is
no
way
right
now.
So,
for
instance,
say
that
you
wanted
to
write
your
own
culture,
aware
string,
topper,
place
method.
You
can't
do
that.
No
problem,
I
understand.
My
point
is
there's
an
existing
overload.
That
is
indexed.
F
F
If
you're
not
working
with
spans,
if
you're
working
with
strings,
then
you
can
easily
call
the
index
erm,
it
takes
a
range
and
hey.
You
know
you
can't
call
subscribe.
That's
my
concern.
That's
my
concern
notice.
Would
we
be
encouraging
people
to
create
sub
strings
where
they
otherwise
I'm
not
terribly
concerned
about
that?
Because
if
people
cared
about
performance
to
that
and
granularity,
they
probably
would
have
been
using
span
or
memory
in
the
first
place.
The
other
thing
about
using
range
viewers
say
that
you
have
a
memory
of
charge.
F
T
B
F
H
F
What's
heritage
disgusted
the,
including
that
means
that
we
have
to
add
a
lot
of
logic
on
to
what
an
LS
and
I
see
you
do
today
and
I
didn't
I
didn't
want
to
have
us
have
opinions
on
top
of
what
mayors
dead?
What
is
the
logic
there
that
the
logic
that
the
logic
that
they
implement
right
now
is
will
tell
you
exactly
where
what
you
search
for
actually
began,
and
we
will
spit
over
0
wait
to
think
is,
while
we're
looking
for.
S
S
F
Though
about
here
I'm
sure
we
are
then
I
cut
it
back
that
we're
saying
like
this
was
the
range
and
the
original
span
and
he
gave
us
there's
an
implicit
indication
that,
like
the
index,
was
for
like
its
pour
into
the
source
yeah,
that's
what
our
underlying
libraries
are
telling
us
to
write.
How
is
it
anyhow?
How
are
we
manipulating
things
by
saying
it's
like
I?
F
Guess,
I,
don't
understand
the
question.
You
just
know
what?
What
is
the
manipulation
that
you're
concerned
about
the
manipulation
we're
concerned
about
is
right
now,
today
we
call
into
Windows
or
ICU,
and
it
says,
I
found
a
match
for
your
thing.
Yeah
your
match
started
at
index.
3
yeah,
it
ended
index
item
again
the
dates
the
8th
member
calling
isn't
called
prefix.
The
is
prefix.
Is
that
not
what
we're
talking
about?
No,
the
API,
the
NLS
API
were
calling
isn't
called
this
prefix
it
no,
but
we
pass
them.
F
We
passing
a
flag
that
says:
please
only
we're
trying
to
mail
you
to
us
if
it
is
a
prefix
match,
otherwise
we're
an
error
and
it
returns
to
us.
A
to
pole,
which
is
starts
at
3
ends
at
7,
oh,
and
by
the
way
it's
a
prefix
match.
What
we
do
is
we
take
that
last
one
turn
it
into
a
pool
and
pop
it
back
out
the
color.
We
don't
do
any
other
relational
abnormalities.
H
F
Give
it
like
giving
the
specific
match,
it's
easy
to
write
yourself,
what
was
the
other
or
what
was
the
and
include
the
leading
right
space
yeah.
If
you
do
the
other
one,
you
have
to
do
a
second
call
of
now
that
you
now
you've
sliced
down
to
the
part
you
care
about
and
now
ask
index
up,
and
let
it
tell
you
where
the
white
space
ended.
So
you
leave
mail
like
giving
the
which,
by
the
way,
we
provide
them
a
viewing
for
them.
F
F
So
if
we
return
to
you
something
that
include,
if
we
return
to
you
arrange
that
includes
the
quotes,
you
could
potentially
be
highlighting
the
wrong
thing
within
your
idea,
but
we're
not
past
again.
Something
unit
says
ignore
whitespace,
compare
options.
House
flags
on
that
to
say
things
like
ignore
quotes
ignore
other
endless,
while
you're
doing
research
ignore
dashes.
F
F
I
F
At
that
point,
you
explicitly
epic
also
past
and
compare
often
speaking
or
punctuation,
no
I
get
it
they
just
it's
a
weird
definition
starts
with
it.
Yes,
the
the
reason
for
it
is
because,
when
you're
doing
things
like
searching
for
people's
last
names
in
the
database,
for
instance,
you
often
want
to
ignore
punctuation,
because
maybe
your
last
name
is
hyphenated
and
you
want
kind
of
a
fuzzy
match.
So
there
there
are
scenarios
Berg,
they're,
not
common
they're,
always
got
to
your
punctuation.
F
X
So
question
about
overloads:
we
have
another
API,
they
was
approved
as
you
link
to
it
that
has
compared
options
as
an
option
parameter,
so
it
has
source
prefix
options
as
off
the
browser,
and
now
we
have
be
adding
this
there's
options
is
not
optional
any.
Without
do
we
want
to
change
either
of
those
so
that
they
overload
nice
or
you
just
find
the
way
they
are.
X
F
B
F
Up
doing
more
work
under
the
covers
in
order
to
become
read,
but
you
already
have
the
existing
source
prefix
and
options
API
yeah
not
for
spans
correct.
They
are
there's
a
PR
out
for
them
now
when
they're
introduced,
but
they're
not
currently
truck
done.
So
we
have
a
PR
for
this
BAM
there,
the
span
of
I'd.
Compare
again
is
this
thing
there.
T
X
N
Y
F
That's
gonna
be,
like
you
have
same
thing,
an
account
that
is
a
not
a
match
to
any
existing
overloads
and
then,
if
you
say,
come
also
I
have
more
parameters.
Okay.
Why
would
in
what
situation
I'm
just
we're
adding
the
other
one
with
defaulted
parameters.
The
string
winner
has
previously
had
the
overload
that
didn't
take
them.
F
Is
a
way
like-
let's
say
you
have,
is
prefix
with
source
and
and
like
I,
want
to
call
this
prefix
with
source
and
prefix
yeah.
This
overload
lets
me
do
that
plus
it
allows
me
to
pass
the
compare
options
and
then
adding
the
overload
of
takes
a
range
as
well
allows
me
to
do
source
prefix
source,
prefix
options
and
source
clean
things
out
of
options
range.
F
F
So
if
you,
if
you
care
yes,
if
you
care
about
getting
back
the
actual
range,
you
are
probably
doing
the
equivalent
of
strained
off
her
place
or
you're,
probably
at
a
highlighting
scenario
like
I
mentioned
earlier,
at
which
point
you're,
probably
passing
and
explicit
from
their
offerings.
It's
bad
I
see
addressing
the
it
can't
be
done
yep.
It
could
be
it's
after
all.
The
explanation,
I
think.
The
one
thing
that
still
stands
out
to
me
is
that
we
should
introduce
the
name
trifle
short
shirt.
F
H
F
A
F
Could
also
follow
tarik
suggestion
and
just
say
we
only
out
the
lengths
for
his
prefix
in
this
others
and
if
you
were
looking
for
where
the
text
actually
matched
sorry,
we
don't
expose
an
API,
for
that
seems
problematic,
though,
because
if
you're,
assuming
that
the
prefix
begins
in,
if
we
only
give
out
the
length
and
you're
assuming
it
begins
at
the
beginning
and
it
doesn't
actually
mean
in
the
beginning,
is
the
length
actually
useful
to
you?
We
would
we
would
just
like
that.
We
return
to
you
know
you
would
do
the
manipulation
that
you
didn't.
F
F
F
B
F
X
X
F
Was
trying
to
this
was
trying
to
get
you
to
think
of
things
not
in
terms
of
raw
indices,
but
in
terms
of
spices?
So
if
you
call
try
find
you
can
with
that
information
slice
everything
before
it
slice
the
occurrence
itself
or
slice
everything
after
it
without
at
any
point
ever
needing
to
know
what
it
index
lost.
That
was
the
user
case.
Part
well.
A
It
gave
me
non
summarize
where
they
are,
because,
honestly,
a
lot
stricter
ABI
are
we
now
saying
that
you
want?
These
overloads
is
the
way
they
are.
Are
we
saying
we
don't?
Because
what
I'm
hearing
is
that
kind
of
a
mixture
so
I
think
for
its
prefix?
It
seems
that
we
all
generally
in
the
women
that
the
name
is
right.
Outing
a
range
is
fine.
The
only
thing
I
heard
was
compare
options,
whether
it
should
be
optional
or
not.
Yes,
I
think
I.
F
Don't
think
there's
a
large
scenario
for
I
think
we
will
be
on
that
I.
Think.
The
only
question
is:
is
our
history
so
for
his
professional
topics,
are
they
as
written
or
is
it
returning
in
hint
and
then
out
into
or
is
it
returning
a
pool
and
and
out
int?
That's
the
open
question
for
those
I
think
for
the
last
two.
It
was
decided
that
their
index
of
last
index
of
returning
in
into
with
an
out
did
I.
F
Don't
think
that
the
is
should
return
anything
then
the
question
is:
is
it
out
range
around
it
yeah?
We
should
probably
unify
them
and
say
how
them
for
all
of
them,
I
would
say
for
know
some
index
of
we're
overloading
its
the
existing
overloading
tells
you
where
a
comput
yep
we're
also
adding.
This
is
how
long
it
was
episode
of
this.
The
we're
overloading
the
existing
thing,
where
you
have
the
constraints
of
the
method
that
already
exists
for.
F
F
Do
you
can
do
with
that
information,
and
if
we
were,
if
we
out
match
length,
then
now
in
half
of
the
scenarios
we
can
think
of
you're
just
calling
that
index
of
immediately
again
to
find
out
that
the
only
thing
that
was
before
it
was
like
this,
so
I
think
that
the
range
one
makes
sense.
I
would
do
that
rather
than
two
out
in
sand.
F
H
A
F
F
F
C
F
F
E
I
F
F
M
F
T
A
T
E
A
X
A
F
I
kind
of
linked
up
there
at
the
top,
because
the
floodgates
are
open
and
now
I'm
very
happy.
So
essentially
it's
if
you
were
going
to
take
in
a
span
and
return
the
span
and
then
go
crap,
no
need
to
take
in
a
read-only
span
and
a
writable
span
and
a
read-only
memory
and
a
writable
memory.
The
answer
is,
you
should
have
been
said,
record
range
yeah
and
then
now
we
don't
need
to
define
forever.
Nothing
yeah
just
have
to
do.
F
F
That
the
caller,
like
it's
the
caller,
has
the
slight
looking
at
their
code
like.
Why
are
you
making
me
say
things
go
find
where
this
was.
Why
didn't
you
just-
and
it's
like
well
because
otherwise
needed
four
of
them,
because
we
need
to
see
so.
It's
like.
There
is
a
good
reason
that
you
have
to
write
one
more
expression.
K
F
For
the
last
two
now
that
they
are
over
loads
of
index
of
do
we
do
we
want
the
string
overloads
that
out
the
math
link,
or
are
we
going
to
make
those
people
go
down
to
if
foster
are
as
well?
There
are
many
many
many
different
overloads
of
index
of
and
last
index
tones
because
their
overload
so
take
offset
length,
some
combination
of
the
two-
and
they
have
very
odd
behavior
so
and
I
don't
want
to
add
those
overloads.
Okay,
which
means
I,
don't
want
to
add
this
tournament.
F
L
O
L
F
File
formats,
but
we
required
them
all
to
be
in
their
binary
representation
instead
of
their
text
representation
partially,
because
the
text
representation
is
complicated,
but
we
simplified
what
we're
going
to
accept
with
another
proposal
for
5o
of
adding
with
him
encoding
reader
aka
the
thing
that's
returning
a
struct
with
3
ranges
in
it,
and
so
then,
now
with
that,
we
can
make
a
common
implementation
so,
like
the
RSA
class,
can
understand.
These
are
the
three
file
format.
H
C
S
K
C
F
Of
the
old
crypto
standards
just
used
octet
for
everything
such
as
password
and
they
never
really
defined
how
human
text
passwords
were
supposed
to
be
turned
into
hock
totes.
So
it's
up
to
the
application
and
to
figure
out
how
to
do
that
and
then
once
you
have
that
binary
data,
then
they
pass
it
in
here,
but
it
was
like
1992.
So
the
answer
was
its
ASCII
yeah.
So
of
course
everybody
understood
what
they
meant
and
then
then
later
they're
like
well.
Obviously
what
they
meant
was
utf-8,
because
that
makes
the
passwords
keep
working.
K
F
F
F
K
S
A
F
The
answer
would
be
yes,
except
in.net
framework
3/5,
they
may
be
CVS
a
and
you
see,
diffie-hellman
be
different
types
and
they
are
the
exact
same
structure
okey.
So
all
that
we
know
is
that
as
an
elliptic
curve,
cryptography
key,
we
couldn't
tell
you
which
one
to
do
so.
We
can't
make
a
helper
that
that
it
takes
a
file
and
produces
a
different
team.
Does.
F
A
very
much
so
you
were
just
try,
try
couch
well
you've
already
loaded
it
like
you've
said
this
is
an
RSA
and
you're
importing
anything.
If
we
didn't
find
a
key
in
it,
that's
a
problem.
Yeah.
We
don't
find
a
key
in
the
file,
then
the
front.
How
would
you
know
that
it's
RSA
without
cracking
over
the
pendant?
Looking
at
of
yourself?
How
would
you
know
if
he
called
import
from
subject
public
key
and
photos
it?
It
wasn't
a
nice
thing
caller
popping
well,
they.
F
F
M
A
F
Z
A
J
F
F
When
you
ask
for
the
result,
it's
thrown
away
all
of
the
state,
because
that's
actually
how
the
algorithm
works,
and
so
that
means
that,
if
you're
trying
to
do
the
role
and
continue
hash
algorithm,
you
need
to
already
open
like
six
of
them
in
parallel
and
keep
feeding
the
data
into
all
of
them
and
then
shrinking
it
as
you
go.
People
find
that
annoying
I'm
surprisingly
so
this
is
a
80
has
a
new
method
which,
given
an
existing
incremental
hash
object,
it
will
clone
the
internal
state
so
on
effectively.
F
F
So
that's
the
theory
of
duplicate
hash
and
then,
additionally,
alternatively,
there's
try
to
get
current
hash,
/
beginner
hash,
which
just
does
that
for
you.
So
you
don't
have
to
see
that
you
don't
have
to
look
like
answer
to
using
the
duplicate
is
good
if
you
want
to
fork
like
these
files
are
the
same
for
the
first
Meg
and
then
they're
different
after
that
and
I
know
that,
and
just
trust
me
and
try
to
get
current
hash
or
the
rolling
hash
is
actually
more
what
you
wanted.
F
Think
both
they're
fine,
like
certain
effectively
trying
it
current
hash,
is
going
to
be
written
in
terms
of
duplicate
that
we
can
hide
that
under
the
covers
for
you,
and
we
could
probably
even
do
better
and
yeah.
We
can
do
better
and
not
create
the
intermediate
disposable
videos.
The
the
original
proposal
just
had
tried
concurrency
concurrent
hash.
Basically,
it
just
said
give
me
give
me
the
moment
in
time
answer
and
then
let
me
keep
working
with
this
instance.
F
I
had
suggested
as
a
more
generalized
solution
being
able
to
actually
form
the
entire
instance
so
that
you
can
now
have
separate
operations
running
on
each.
It
is
a
more
generalized
solution,
but
I
can't
think
of
any
scenarios
that
would
warrant
a
more
generalized
since
the
scenarios
that
I'm
familiar
with
I'll
only
ever
require
a
moment
in
time
answer,
and
then
you
keep
going
so
you
know,
what's
the
difference
between
so
a
moment
in
time
answer
and
those
Jeremy
said
is
given
if
I
were
to
ask
me
for
the
answer
right.
This
very
second
right.
F
A
T
F
Get
current
hash
solves
all
the
current
needs.
Anyone
have
asked
for
write,
duplicate,
hash
lets
you
more
easily
compute
the
hashes
of
the
real
timeline
and
alternate
timeline
and
I,
like
that,
it's
more
the
reason
why
I
suggested
that's
more
generalized,
but
I
don't
know
who
would
need
that
more
generalize.
F
A
F
V
F
F
J
A
Mean
based
on
what
what
Levi
just
said,
I
would
probably
start
with
that,
but
I
would
probably
call
it
Colonia
cuz
that
people
I
think
know
what
that
would
mean
wait.
So
you
would
you
would
do
the
full
normalization,
no
I'm
just
saying
I
would
remove
the
first
method
for
now,
but
if
we
were
to
do
it,
I
would
probably
call
it.
Okay,
somebody.
F
A
F
A
F
K
F
Does
not,
but
presumably
oh
you
can
get
the
algorithm
name,
I
mean,
presumably
you
the
color
or
the
one
that
created
this
in
the
first
place.
So
presumably
you
know
how
big
the
digest
is,
and
if
it's,
if
we
don't
already
have
the
link,
then
it's
probably
already
annoyed
me
in
the
past
and
if
we
want
to
get
the
comments
here,
if
the
Hat
incremental
has
to
tell
you
how
long
the
hash
is
going
to
produces,
then
that
would
you
know.
F
A
A
F
F
F
F
Can
say
what
we're
looking
at
the
type
of
like
this
was
added
early
in
our
span,
stuff
and
I
want
to
add,
get
current
hash
that
takes
destination
and
returns
returns,
the
number
of
bikes
at
Row
two
and
frozen
it's
too
small
yeah
and
then
do
the
same
for
trying
to
get
hatchet
reset
reset
in
the
Netherlands
yeah.
What.
A
F
A
F
X
P
A
F
A
P
P
F
F
X
F
P
F
Z
S
W
F
F
X
J
Y
O
A
F
You
look
at
the
fact
that
there
are
two
methods:
if
you
just
see
get
hatched
when
you
want
to
get
hash
and
reset
you'll,
probably
call
that
and
think
it's
gay
yeah
most
most
people
who
are
familiar
with
cryptographic,
algorithms
would
expect
to
get
hash
to
be
a
destructive
operation,
because
the
last
thing
it
has
to
do
is
right.
This
is
the
total
number
of
bytes
that
I
gave.
You
remember.
F
B
M
O
A
F
O
A
Q
A
P
A
F
A
A
T
Q
P
Basically,
we
added
span
api's
to
a
number
of
places.
Decimal
was
one
that,
where
a
number
of
scenarios
weren't
covered,
we've
had
a
few
requests
for
it,
so
people
are
basically
just
asking.
Let
me
create
a
decimal
from
existing
set
of
bits.
We
already
have
ones
that
take
array
and
likewise
allow
us
to
return
the
underlying
bits
and
span.
P
B
K
C
F
F
P
P
F
P
F
P
J
J
K
X
To
small-
and
they
just
know
that
it
needs
to
be
four
and
resizing
and
call
again
rather
than
calling
crank,
advise
resize
the
spare,
but
like
know
that
they
they're
Spanish
to
small
and
do
whatever
they
rather
than
calling
crank,
8,
bytes
and
then
verifies
result
and
it
returns
false
and
then
doing
whatever
they
need
to
do
that
front.
Under
you
know,
people.
X
F
You
would
call
the
target
method
if
you're
the
left,
like,
let's
say
you're
the
last
thing
in
an
existing
or
in
a
more
complicated,
try
get
benefit.
They
are
writing
the
stuff
down
yeah
a
previous
thing,
sliced
you,
you
don't
like
calling
the
try
again
just
lets
you.
It
saves
you
the
if
you
know
number
of
bytes
remaining
is
less
than
four
return:
false
you're,
just
like
retired,
and
you
try
again
it's
really
good.
If
you're
in
a
pipeline
granted
I
can't
imagine
a
pipeline
in
to
be
working
with
Spanish
int.
S
F
F
I
F
B
F
That'll
take
a
read-only
span.
Yes,
oh
yes,
so
it's
the
accepting
an
oversized
span,
in
which
case
it
should
report
how
much
it
consumed,
which
you
can't
really
do
it
instructor
to
don't
thinking
about?
No,
but
if
the
existing
array
one
is
already
throwing
if
the
length
is
not
exactly
four
than
the
soldiers,
though
uplink
is
not
exactly
four
there
and
we
do
something
someone
again
like
if
you
pass
a
read-only
spent
about
the
liquid
constructor,
it
will
fail
if
the
length
is
anything
over
such
a
thing.
T
C
F
F
P
F
H
H
F
H
U
F
A
E
F
J
F
F
Miss
data
and
now
you'll
just
have
to
translate
it
into
what
machine
it's
it's
because
by
wrapping
up
some
cases
where
I'm,
where
I'm
blindly
reading
32
bits
of
data
and
I
need
to
convert
it,
it's
coming
as
big
endian,
because
utf-8
is
all
these
big
endian
and
before
I
perform
arithmetic
operations
on
it,
I
need
to
make
sure
that
it's
in
machine
and
the
in
format
so
that
I
don't
end
up
having
endianness
issues
when
I
eventually
go
to
write
it
back
out.
Tonight,
yeah
seems
like
a
very
specialized
thing
for
a
case.
H
E
H
F
H
F
Reason,
structure,
yeah
right
so
they're
not
reading
these
don't
apply
to
a
structure.
This
would
apply
to
there's
no
side
of
a
member
of
this
one,
yet
yes
or
cop,
so
they
would
need
the
structure
that
blit
it
out
and
then
they
would
do
that
you're
saying
they
would
do
the
that's.
What
I
was
going
to
ask
me
earlier,
like
struct
dot
field
equals
two
little
indians
from
table
field.
I.
H
F
E
P
F
P
K
P
I
F
F
N
F
One
of
the
things
those
days
who
you
are
so
one
of
the
things
that
all
day
be
idle
in
the
in
the
literally,
is
all
open
up
a
separate
proposal,
because
one
of
the
comments
that
kept
coming
up
in
here
is
because
there
are
so
few
overloads
of
hosted
Network
order
and
then
what
the
host
ordered
on
IP
address.
Some
people
keep
calling
the
wrong
overloads
because
they're
passing,
then
you
went
and
it
gets
auto
converted
to
along,
for
instance,
I'll
open
up
a
separately
sure
to
say
we
should
add
the
older
loads.
There.
N
Y
P
F
L
R
I
F
E
B
E
H
E
F
H
L
F
Mentioned
previously
that
four
methods
that
return
asynchronously
value
tasks
like
properly
asynchronously
most
of
the
time
value
testers,
he
made
sense
because
you
could
reuse
the
state
object
that
backs
the
to
you,
but
value
tasks
by
itself
does
not
make
sense,
because
inevitably
it's
going
to
be
turned
into
a
regular
task
and
so
that
it's
a
little
bit
more
complicated.
Unfortunately,.
E
F
F
E
F
E
F
The
way
it's
implemented,
we
will
always
be
able
to
return
a
value
task
that
wraps
the
same
object
over
and
over
and
over.
So
regardless
of
whether
it
contains
synchronously
or
not.
It
would
be
not
allocating
for
this
connect
method.
In
theory,
I
could
imagine
us
doing
some
kind
of
pooling
based
on
asakadai
sync
event,
args
only
the
covers
where,
if
we
had
a
couple
suck
anything
that
darts
in
the
pool
we
check
one
out.
We
use
that
as
the
back
in
the
store
for
this
value
task.