►
Description
Part 1 is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ho-VF2dAszI&list=PL1rZQsJPBU2StolNg0aqvQswETPcYnNKL&index=1
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
You
put
all
the
work
in
to
use
their
API
is
to
go
and
automate
at
all.
If
you
just
want
to
do
it,
the
copy
and
paste
every
step
is
actually
a
bunch
of
manual
Moo's.
They
even
copying
the
embed
link.
They
don't
give
you
a
way
to
just
get
the
URL.
What
you
get
is
the
full
iframe
embed
link
and
then
you
have
to
go
and
munge
it.
So
let
me
do
that.
Let
me
delete
that.
Let
me
see
so
live
asp.net.
Home
page
should
be
updated
to
the
correct
stream.
A
And
then
we'll
have
to
edit
the
videos
together
in
post
for
the
archive,
which
is
fine,
okay,
I
think
we
are
good
everywhere.
People
on
Twitter
sharing
and
people
on
YouTube
are
sharing
the
link
elsewhere,
so
people
can
either
watch
on
Twitch
or
they
can
watch
on
the
new
stream
I'm,
seeing
62
folks
on
the
new
stream,
so
61
folks
on
the
new
stream.
So
that's
a
good
indication.
I
think
that
everyone
is
moved
over
so
without
further
ado,
let's
get
into
the
next
segment.
So
people
are
gonna.
Ask
me
questions
all
right.
A
B
A
That
will
all
right,
I
will
just
so.
Someone
asks
dark.
Mystical
Cory
on
Twitter
asked
me
14
hours
ago
right
now.
Net
core
has
support
for
visual
basic,
but
just
for
libraries
and
console
apps.
Do
you
guys
know
if
there'll
be
a
sprout
neck
core
with
visual
basic
support?
So
today
the
visual
basic
support,
visual
basic.net
support
inner
core,
has
been
fairly
limited.
It's
not
the
full
visual
basic
support.
You
don't
have
all
the
usual
namespaces
and
capabilities
that
you
would
normally
get
with
the
visual
basicnet
runtime.
A
You
could
have
VB
beta
you
all
you
have
is
compiler
support,
so
you
could
have
a
dot
VB
file
and
it
would
compile,
but
you
didn't
get
all
the
visual
basic
specific
api's
and
we
certainly
didn't
have
visual
basic
support
in
the
app
models
like
asp.net
core,
as
mentioned
here.
It's
part
of
dotnet
core
3
and
the
addition
of
the
Windows
desktop
app
workload.
We
will
be
bringing
full
fledged
Visual
Basic
support
into
dotnet
core
3
for
those
workloads
for
the
Windows
desktop
workloads.
A
It
is
fair
to
say
there
are
a
lot
more
WinForms
applications
that
have
visual
basic
than
there
are
web
applications
based
on
our
understanding
of
telemetry
and
those
things
and
talking
to
customers
and
same
again
for
WPF.
So
we
will
be
bringing
full
VB
support,
I'm,
certainly
or
vastly
improved
VB
support
over.
So
you
can
take
your
VB
WinForms
at
WPF
app
and
move
that
to
tonic
or
3.
Currently
we
don't
plan
to
do
any
further
work
in
supporting
VB
in
asp.net
core.
A
You
can
create
a
nice
weight
on
a
core
sort
of
web
api
MVC
application
today,
using
VB
I
have
a
sample
on
my
github
repo.
That
shows
how
you
can
do
that.
We
don't
have
templates
for
it
and
there
is
no
raiser
support
for
VB,
so
we
used
to
have
VB
HTML
back
in
the
old,
a
spinner
MVC
system,
but
the
new
razor
is
strictly
c-sharp
only
and
we
have
zero
plans
to
bring
VB
back
into
Razer
and
with
the
new
blazer
stuff,
then
there's
going
to
be
a
new
file
extension
with
dot
razor.
A
That
will
definitely
only
be
C
sharp.
So
we
would
just
don't
see
the
customer
use
that
warrants
the
amount
of
work
it
takes
to
maintain
both
languages
once
you
go
beyond
I,
just
have
a
vb
file
and
I
want
it
to
compile
so
we're
still
a
little
undecided
as
to
where
the
templates
face
pinnacle
will
show
up.
Templates
are
quite
a
lot
of
work
to
maintain,
as
I
said
it's
possible
today.
A
There's
nothing
stopping
anyone
in
the
community
from
building
an
a
spinet
call
vb
template
package
which
contains
templates,
for
you
know
using
the
features
that
would
work.
But
you
know
we
will
not
put
a
template
in
Visual
Studio.
That
is
a
nice
bit
of
it
called
web
application
that
uses
VB.
If
Razer
doesn't
work,
because
why
would
you
have
C
HTML
files
in
a
project
that
you
can't
get
intelligence
for?
A
You
can't
have
CSN
VB
files
in
the
same
project
and
get
Intel
sensitive
both
that's
just
not
how
the
project
system
in
Visual
Studio
works
today.
So
you
will
not
see
that
template,
but
if
the
community
wanted
to
produce
templates
and
make
them
installed,
all
that
might
be
go
further
for
the
customers
who
do
want
to
try
doing
that.
Then
that
seems
like
the
right
size,
community
and
audience
they
could.
That
could
facilitate
that
next
question
do
I
need
to
know
if
there
is
any
way.
A
This
is
from
ma
Hawaii
on
my
Twitter
feed
I
need
to
know
if
there's
any
way
to
reference.
The
JavaScript
and
CSS
files
in
dotnet
call
two
to
500
SDK
empty
template
projects
other
than
using
Bower
Jason
yeah.
So
we
removed
sort
of
the
Bower
set
up
from
our
templates
a
while
back
when
it
was
announced
that
Bower
was
kind
of
end-of-life
and
we
haven't
replaced
it
in
the
templates.
Yet
so
there's
there's
no
sort
of
out-of-the-box
file,
new,
a
spinet
core
and
then
go
and
update
the
client
libraries.
You
have
to
do
some
work.
A
We
did
release
Lib
man
or
the
you
know.
The
web
tooling
team
released
that
Lib
man,
command-line
and
visual
studio
support
that
lets.
You
do
sort
of
a
simple
client-side
library
management,
but
we
have
not
integrated
that
into
the
templates
phrase,
but
on
their
core
or
asp.net.
Yet
that
is
currently
being
investigated
as
part
of
the
300
wave
and
but
I
don't
have
a
firm
answer
as
to
whether
that
will
happen
in
threat.
You
can
certainly
configure
it
yourself,
so
my
instruction
to
you
right
now
would
be
if
you
want
the
simplest
possible
thing.
A
Configure
live
man
in
your
ACP
net
core
projects
after
you
create
them
and
use
that
to
manage
bringing
in
the
client-side
libraries
and
obviously,
if
you
need
anything
more
than
basic
client-side
library
acquisition,
you
need
bundling
all
that
type
of
stuff.
Then
you
have
to
move
to
something
like
web
pack
or
you
know
gulp
or
whatever
it
is
whatever's
hot
or
whatever
suits
your
workflow
right
now,
I
mean.
B
A
A
Also
done
pack
so
like
Mark,
Rendell,
yep,
right,
the.net,
command
line
tool,
global
tool
that
uses
on
pkg
comm,
which
is
a
live
proxy,
slash,
mirror
of
all
NPM
packages,
and
so
you
can
bring
in
any
NPM
package
file
assets
into
your
project.
Very
simply
it
statically
it
just
copies
them
in
and
then
it's
kind
of
done.
There's
no
manifest
that
really
maintains
about
that.
As
far
as
I
know,
and
then
there's
you
know,
Jas
deliver
and
your
other
CD
ends
that
have
most
of
the
CD
ends.
A
Now
the
ones
that
I've
looked
at
CDN
Jas
is
the
only
one.
That's
really
is
the
biggest
one
being
used
on
public
sites
and
it
still
maintains
its
own
repository.
You
have
to
like
submit
files
to
their
github
repo,
but
they
have
some
policies
that
make
it
a
little
difficult
to
use
for
all
libraries.
For
example,
they
don't
accept
preview
versions,
and
so
we
couldn't
put
the
signal.
A
Completely
and
so
you
request
a
file
through
their
parting
scheme
from
a
github
repo
it'll
go
and
fetch
it
put
it
on
their
edge
servers,
and
then
you
can
get
it
from
there.
Similarly,
from
from
NPM,
so
there
are
options
available
and
there
are
tools
available
to
bring
them
in,
but
we
don't
have
any
by
default
out
of
the
box.
Just
yet.
A
So
my
new
laptop
is
Lenovo
x1
extreme
extreme.
Now,
of
course,
it
was
new,
but
CES
is
on
today,
and
so
nothing
is
new
anymore,
because
this
is
old
and
ancient
cuz
Lenovo
just
announced
all
their
new
laptops,
god
dammit,
and
so
this
was
lovely
two
months
ago
or
a
month
ago,
and
now
it's
just
ancient.
A
No,
no,
it's
an
8th
gen
as
hexa
core
i7
with
v
pro
it's
a
4k
HDR
panel,
which
is
lovely
it's
under
4
pounds,
which
is
insane
because
it's
a
15.6
inch
laptop
32,
gig
of
ram
and
a
terabyte
of
superfast
SSD
with
Windows
facial
recognition,
windows,
hello
and
fingerprint,
and
it
has
an
active
pen
as
well
on
the
screen.
It
basically
has
literally
every
feature
you
could
one
HDMI
to
out
that
there's
two
Thunderbolt
three
ports
that
has
a
dedicated
Ethernet
port,
Rivera
dongle.
A
It's
a
fantastic
piece
of
machinery
in
terms
of
raw
hardware,
I
still
hate
all
laptops
in
existence,
because
I
always
find
something
wrong
with
them.
But
this
is
probably
the
best
one
that
I
hate,
the
least
that
I've
used
in
a
bunch
of
years
and
I
have
the
dock
that
comes
with
it,
which
is
ridiculous,
a
$400
dock
with
every
port
imaginable,
and
it
has
like
two
power
suppliers
you
have
to
plug
into
it:
I'm
not
kidding.
It
has
two
power
suppliers
you
have
to
plug
into
the
dock.
A
At
the
same
time,
one
of
them
is
a
230
watt
power
supply
that
gets
passed
directly
into
the
laptop
it'll,
suck
that
much
power
up
if
you're,
driving
it
and
I
can
drive
I
Drive
to
external
4k
panels,
as
well
as
the
4k
panel
on
here
simultaneously
and
I.
Think
it
supports
a
third
external
4k
panels
that
I
haven't
plugged
in
yet
because
it
has
an
Nvidia,
10-15,
gtx,
1050
TI
in
here
as
well.
So
a
lot
of
power,
a
lot
of
power,
but
what's.
A
Yeah,
if
you
unplug
it
and
you
run
it
at
high
performance,
you'll
get.
You
know
two
three
hours,
but
if
you
drag
it
down
a
couple
of
notches
and
can
live
without
look
rendering,
you
know
five
seconds
to
render
an
email,
then
you
can
go
most
of
the
day
on
it.
So,
but
you
know
in
my
workflow
I'm,
usually
tethered
so
somewhere,
another
I'm
not
plugged
in
right
now.
So
nice.
A
Were
we've
had
this
ask
ever
Mb
was
released
in
2009,
whatever
it
was
2008
the
the
last
I
heard
and
I'm
just
gonna
go
for
it.
I,
don't
know
how
official
any
of
this
was.
The
last
I
heard
the
SSR
SSR
esteem.
Someone
else
are
they
abandoned
that
they
are
still
they're
still
a
team,
it's
the
same
orb
that
does
power.
Bi
is
my
understanding.
A
There
was
a
massive
amount
of
work
because
you're
throwing
everything
out
basically
and
moving
it
to
a
new
platform,
so
the
last
time
I
heard
from
them
regarding
this,
it
was
that
they
were
going
to
move
to
a
client-based
thing,
which
means
that
you
can
wrap
that
up
in
any
server
based
rendering
tech
that
you
like,
because
it
just
has
to
emit
the
right
data
for
the
client
to
render
I,
don't
have
any
timelines
for
folks.
I.
Don't
have
anything
like
that.
A
I
can
kick
it
up
the
old
chart
and
across
the
old
chart
again
and
see
if
I
can
get
something
a
little
more
committed,
but
we
haven't
sorry
I,
don't
have
anything
more
concrete
than
that.
It
is
an
ask
that
we
get
a
lot.
We
understand
that
there
are
a
lot
of
customers
who
use
it
because
it
is
a
you
know:
fantastic
drop
in
reporting
solution
for
a
lot
of
folks
who
have
deployed
sequel
server,
reporting
services
because
it's
self-service
reporting
it's
a
whole
watering
experience
as
well
as
the
visual
experience,
there's
also
power
bi.
A
So
if
power
bi
suits
your
needs,
then
I
would
encourage
folks
to
go
off
and
look
at
power
bi,
because
their
client
integration
technology
is
more
so
bi
frame.
Slash.
You
know,
rendered
they're
delivered
into
your
app
via
an
iframe
type
of
thing,
so
that
can
work
anywhere,
whereas
SSRS
requires
you
to
host
a
component
in
your
application
in
the
current
technology.
So
look
at
power
bi.
If
it
suits
you,
if
you
really
just
need
SSRS,
then
I
don't
have
a
good
answer
for
you
just
yet.
B
A
So
I
we,
my
understanding,
is
we
have
like.
We
have
a
generic
open,
ID
Connect
provider,
which
will
point
to
anything.
If
you
want
to
build
your
own
or
warth
provider.
Frankly,
I
would
just
look
at
the
source
code
for
one
of
the
other
ones.
It
would
be
where
I
would
start
or
look
at
its
at
Kevin
chalets
suite
of
open.
A
He
only
in
that
community
I
understand
HAP's,
like
a
large
set
of
third
party
or
Wharf
based
or
other.
You
know,
open
authentication,
open,
ID
based
provider,
so
they
have
the
github
and
they
they're
like
everything.
Anyone
ever
asked
for
they
wrapped
up
and
created
and
there's
a
github
repo,
just
full
of
them.
I
don't
have
that
link
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
I've
seen
it
I
know
it
exists
as
opposed
to
I,
don't
believe
we
have
a
custom
doc,
that's
just
like
yeah.
A
B
B
A
One
of
them
supported
the
idea
of
a
custom
model
binder
that
could
do
this.
I
don't
have
a
good
answer
regarding
a
spinet
cause
model
binding.
That
would
be
a
good
issue
to
post
on
github,
to
sort
of
gauge
community
response
and
see
if
there's
already
a
good
answer
for
that.
I
don't
have
one
off
the
top
of
my
head.
Sorry,
but
that's
a
good
question
all.
A
Absolutely
not
our
parent
plan
we
just
met
about
this
yesterday
yeah
is
to
update
the
workshop
for
2.2,
which
is
what
it
was
advertised,
as
so
yeah
plan
on
changing
that
and
will
because
we
added
a
lot
of
great
features
in
2.2,
specifically
around
API
development,
which
we
do
a
lot
of
in
the
workshop,
and
so
in
fact,
a
lot
of
the
features
in
were
actually
inspired.
Inspired.
Inspired
by
what
we
learned
in
building
applications
in
the
workshops.
Okay,
a
lot
of
this
stuff
seems
repetitive.
A
Well,
you
should
have
to
write
that
much
code
to
do
this
basic
stuff,
so
we
build
features
to
remove
a
lot
of
that,
and
so
we're
gonna
update
it
for
that
three
or
frankly,
three
oh
preview
is
just
not
ready
to
teach
a
workshop
on
for
a
spit
on
their
core
customer
or
for
anyone
really
at
the
moment.
You
know,
there's
no
designer
support
for
view.
There's
no
templates
for
the
individuals,
video
like
it's
just
too
early
and
there's
only
been
one
preview.
A
There
will
be
another
preview
soon
and
then
it'll
be
a
preview
after
that,
a
preview
after
that,
and
it
will
get
better
preview
to
preview
to
preview
before
we
get
to
something
that
I
would
say.
Yes,
that's
going
to
teach
a
workshop
on
this
now,
but
it
is
not
certainly
not
gonna
be
ready
by
the
end
of
this
month.
We.
B
A
What
we
were
talking
about
there
was
the
things
I
talked
about
in
the
end
of
my
announcement
announcement
blog
post,
which
were
the
things
that
didn't
make
it
into,
but
that
we
still
want
to
ship
before
three,
oh,
and
they
are
mostly
the
things
that
start
integrating
more
third-party
sort
of
solutions.
So
that
was
the
API
authorization
from
identity
server.
A
It
was
the
open,
API,
slash,
swagger
document
generation
and
client
generation,
so,
like
you
had
to
generate
a
c-sharp
or
type
scope,
client
for
your
open,
API
endpoint,
using
things
like
auto
rest
and
n
swag
and
then
a
template
that
brings
all
of
those
together
so
that
you
can
say,
hey
crepe
me
an
API
app
with
a
spark
client
that
uses
authorization
and
generates
the
client
automatically
based
on
my
API
on
the
server
right.
So
that
sort
of
bundle
of
things
and
the
HTTP
repple.
A
They
were
all
the
things
that
we
talked
about
during
to
to
dev
that
didn't
actually
make
inter
to
to
all
of
those
except
the
repple.
We
still
intend
to
get
out
in
customers
hands
before
three.
Oh
and
I
intend
to
use
those
in
the
workshop.
At
the
end
of
this
month,
so
that
gives
you
an
indication
of
where
they
are
and
how
quickly
we
should
be
able
to
get
those
up
and
running
for
customers
except
the
repple.
The
repple
has
been
pushed
out
to
three.
Oh,
there
is
a
copy
of
it
under
new
get
right.
A
A
A
B
B
B
A
Yes,
I'm
very
happy
to
announce
that,
yes,
that
is
that
is
definitely
that
was
one
of
our
design
goals
was
we're
gonna.
We
didn't
want
to
reboot
the
razor
stack
again
and
then
say
great,
take
your
apps
and
just
port
them
all
over
or
migrate
them
over
to
this
completely
different
razor
stack,
because
the
new
razor
component
stack
has
differences.
A
It
has
you
know
things
that
you
can't
do
in
there
compared
to
the
existing
razor
stack
with
regards
to
how
it
compiles
with
regards
to
the
application
model,
because
it's
designed
to
solve
a
different,
you
know,
run
in
different
places
and
solve
a
different
set
of
problems,
so
we
were
like
well,
how
do
we
bridge
the
gaps
between
I
have
a
set
of
razor
views
or
razor
pages,
which
are
basically
the
same
thing?
They
just
get
routed
to
differently
right,
which
is
very
much
request/response.
A
You
have
returned
from
a
view
or
returned
as
a
result
of
a
route
versus
a
razor
component,
which
is
a
stateful
thing.
It's
designed
to
have
state
that
lives
and
responds
to
client-side
events
and
stuff.
How
do
we
put
these
together?
So
what
we
are
going
to
support
is
you
can
take
a
razor
component
and
basically
render
it
inside
a
razor
view
kind
of
like
a
partial
or
a
view
component
today.
A
So
if
you
have
a
razor
component,
I
build
my
you
know,
Damian's
grade
razor
component
and
it
does
whatever
you
will
be
able
to
basically
call
that
or
invoke
it
like
a
tag
helper
or
a
partial
or
a
view
component.
Today,
inside
your
razor
view,
slash
page
when
I
say
razor
view
that
includes
razor
pages.
Okay,
then
that
razor
component
will
render
in
the
context
of
that
razor
view
and
if
you
were
just
doing
a
one-shot,
a
I'm
returning
the
view
from
an
MVC
controller
action,
it'll
just
render
and
then
that's
the
end
of
it.
A
A
Just
for
the
little
component,
that's
inside
the
overall
view,
and
then
that
can
respond
to
client-side
events
using
the
blazer
server-side
technology,
all
right
so
that
now,
when
you
click
the
button
inside
the
component
or
hit
the
drop-down
or
whatever
it
is
that
actually
sends
that
event
up
to
the
server
over
the
the
signal.
Our
connection
does
the
re-rendering
on
the
razor
components,
engine
running
in
your
server
app
and
then
sends
the
Delta,
the
Dom,
literally
the
Dom
Delta
back
down
to
the
client
and
updates
the
Dom
in
real-time.
A
It
is
an
island
of
blazer
server-side
inside
a
razor
view.
Now
the
working
title
for
this
technology
is
called
razor
or
component
circuits.
So
the
idea
being
that
you
have
a
razor
component
or
any
component
they're,
not
really
limited
to
razor
they're
somewhat
separate,
but
the
one
we're
shipping
is
razor
components
that
can
establish
a
circuit
back
to
the
server
and
that
circuit
is
alive
so
that
you
can
it's
an
interactive
experience.
A
Then
we
intend-
and
we
haven't,
got
all
the
details
in
this
yet,
but
we
intend
to
support
things
like
well
I
now,
I,
don't
want
that
to
be
alive,
the
whole
time
if
the
user
isn't
using
it.
So
I
want
to
be
able
a
tombstone
that
circuit
away
and
maintain
the
state
associated
with
that
component,
and
that
could
happen
automatically
like
in
like
a
mobile
app
does
right.
A
So
if
you
don't
touch
it
for
30
seconds,
maybe
he
gets
tombstoned
away
on
the
server
and
the
client
and
then,
as
soon
as
you
touch
it
again,
it
establishes
it
again
and
it
wakes
up
the
state
and
the
server
after
a
short
delay,
and
now
the
interactivity
is
back.
So
all
that
is
planned
as
part
of
the.net
core
3
razor
component
story.
Our
goal
is
by
the
end
of
this
month,
is
to
have
a
lot
more
public
detail
available
about
our
plans
around
that.
A
A
Excited
about
that
technology,
our
ability
to
take
the
razor
server
side,
blazer
component,
rendering
stuff
and
shove
it
inside
an
existing
razor
view
as
a
little
island
of
interactivity.
If
you
don't
want
the
interactivity-
and
you
just
want
to
render
the
component
once
and
then
have
it
be
static
HTML,
we
will
totally
support
that
as
well.
So
don't
don't
fret.
B
Okay-
and
let
me
see,
will
you
WP?
You
have
dotnet
course
sorry.
A
B
A
Yes,
I
blaze,
a
we
should
do
a
separate
show
on
this.
At
some
point,
I
mean
I,
think
we've
talked
about
it
before,
but
now
that
it's
actually
being
coming,
we
should
we
should
talk
about
the
story
of
Blaziken.
Eda
is
quite
and
there's
actually
there's
actually
a
PowerPoint
deck,
an
internal
deck
that
Dan
put
together
that
talks
about
the
story
of
Blaser
and
they
like
from
the
from
its
inception
all
the
way
through
to
where
it
is
now.
A
The
short
story
is
that
Steve
Sanderson
is
a
crazy,
crazy
man,
magician
person,
and
he
had
an
idea
for
a
demo
and
decided
hey
I'm
gonna
a
nine
days
put
together
a
demo
that
shows
it.
You
can
rent
the
dock
now
on
the
client
and
I'll
build
her
this
little
spa
framework.
That
goes
on
top
of
it
by
hacking
razor
and
he
did
it,
and
then
he
showed.
B
A
And
I
this
demo
on
the
showroom
floor
of
in
DC
Oslo
what
two
years
ago,
or
something
and
I
remember
distinctly
looking
at
the
screen
and
looking
at
David
look
at
the
screen
and
like
I,
had
liked
being
speechless
what
he
was
explaining,
how
he
hacked
this
incredible
demo
together
and,
in
fact,
there's
a
recording
of
Seth
Juarez
did
an
interview
with
David
and
I
like
20
minutes
after
we'd
seen
this
demo,
and
we
were
just
like.
Oh
my.
A
Believe
what
we
just
saw
and
you
can
watch
the
talk-
it's
actually
kind
of
amazing.
This
had
happened
in
conjunction
with
Dan
Roth
who's.
The
PM
4
blazer,
asking
us
about
webassembly
he
was
like
are
we
should
be
looking
at
webassembly?
You
know
it
was
super
early
at
that
stage,
so
maybe
we
could
get
web
person
that
running
webassembly.
It
would
be
amazing
to
like
let
people
run
their
apps
and
the
client
and
David
were
like
yeah
yeah.
A
That's
just
like
that's
for
doing
OpenGL,
WebGL,
games
and
stuff
that
hasn't
doesn't
have
any
legs
just
yet,
and
then
Steve
did
that
figure
in
that
kind
of
that
turned
a
corner.
So
then
it
became
an
experiment.
We
figured
out
how
to
sort
of
do
an
open
experiment
without
committing
to
a
project,
which
is
something
we've
never
done
before.
So
that
was
interesting
and
we
were
able
to
get.
A
B
A
A
B
It's
been
a
little
bit
since
we've
had
an
EF
focus,
show
to
that
might
be
good
to
have
an
update.
Why
is
there
no
big
project
tutorial
using
signal?
Are
all
signal
are
tutorials,
throw
very
basic
public
chat.
App
I
would
disagree
with
this,
in
that
there
are
some
good
ones,
but
I
had
to
like
look
around.
They
were
on
like,
for
instance,
Azure
signal.
Our
service
has
some
pretty
good
ones.
There's.
B
A
Aren't
the
standard
sort
of
chat
stuff?
Frankly,
it
gets
yeah
I
think
it
requires
a
lot
more
work
because
to
build
real-time
into
other,
more
functional
apps.
Obviously
you
need
the
other
more
functional
app.
That
has
a
good
need
for
bit.
Interactive
forms
is
a
good
one
so
like
when
you've
got
the
need
to
track
changes
that
multiple
users
might
be
doing
on
the
same
data
at
the
same
time
with
conflict
resolution
and
optimistic
concurrency
versus
pessimistic,
and
all
you
how?
How
do
you
do
all
that
tough
stuff
when
you
add
real
time?
A
A
A
If
it's
an
auth
cookie
and
that
we
don't
have
any
support
for
a
classic
ASP
or
thin
a
swing,
there
call
we
have
support
the
other
way.
There
is
support
for
the
new
identity
cookies
in
previous
a
spin
it
on
the
on
an
updated
version
of
identity
for
that.
But
if
it's
a
different
cookie
you'd
have
to
let
us
know
what
cookie
it
is.
You're
trying
to
read.
A
So
it's
part
of
three:
oh,
there
were
a
couple
of
clients
that
were
thrown
into
the
mix.
One
was
the
C++
client
and
two
was
a
swift
client
and
my
understanding
is
we're
currently
committed
to
doing
the
C++
client
for
300
in
the
trio
timeline,
because
the
C++
client
doesn't
ship
and
don't
take
all
three
right,
so
it
can
ship
it
any
time.
Frankly,
but
in
the
same
timeframe
the
C++
client
and
the
Swift
clients
were
the
one
that
we
were
looking
at
doing
the
ones
that
we
were
looking
at
doing
next
cool.
B
A
B
A
A
Hit
150
like
a
couple
months
ago
right,
so
if
we
recently
actually
well
on
every
week
every
week
this
year
we
get
200
before
the
end
of
the
year,
we
could
have
a
big
party
yep.
We
could
do
an
in-person
event
like
all
those
YouTube,
the
entertainers
do
we
could
pick
whoever
McDonald's
or
something
and
I'm
just
kidding.
Remember.
A
We
don't
have
again,
we
hope,
to
have
some
firmer
plans
to
share
with
folks
by
the
end
of
this
month,
about
it
all
comes
down
to
how
much
we
can
fit
into
the
core
300
miles
sort
of
timelines.
The
right
now
there
isn't
anything
in
Blazer.
You
I
think
there
are
some
examples
of
how
you
might
do
that
and
there's
the
community.
How
is
offered
some
ports
of
Redux
and
like
style,
stuff
and
other
sort
of
state
containers,
or
you
can
just
do
very
simple
stuff
yourself.
A
If
we
want
to
implement
something
like
like
I
talked
about
like
circuit,
tombstoning
or
hibernation,
then
that's
going
to
require
that
there's
some
contract
that
says
all
great
where's
your
state,
so
I
can
tombstone
it
and
then
bring
it
back.
So
whether
that
means
we
implement
a
state's
a
paradigm
of
some
sort
or
there's
a
contract
that
you
can
implement
so
that
we
can
talk
to
your
state,
so
I
don't
know
yet.
So
that's
something
that
will
be
figured
out
over
the
coming
weeks.
A
B
A
A
B
A
B
A
A
So
blazer
runs
in
the
Java
Script
sandbox,
and
so
as
long
as
there
is
an
API
in
the
browser
to
expose
the
webcam
like
a
webcam
as
a
stream
which
it
is
and
the
microphone
is
the
stream,
then
you
can
in
theory,
create
a
rapper
net
package
or
API
that
will
bridge
that
JavaScript
API
internet
via
the
JavaScript
bridge
from
webassembly.
It
is
all
technically
possible,
so
I'm,
not
a
I'm
not
as
up
to
speed
on
the
Blazer
contributor
stuff.
A
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
Blazer
sort
of
rapper
packages
available
that
bridge
to
browser
API
is
internet
I'm,
not
aware
of
any
that
do
streaming
API,
so
it
doesn't
mean
they
don't
exist,
I'm
just
unaware
of
them.
I,
don't
know
of
any
technical
reason
why
that
could
not
be
done
as
in
yeah.
You
get
a
typed
array
with
a
bunch
of
bytes
in
it
from
JavaScript
from
a
given
API.
Then
we
have
to
map
that
to
a
dotnet
stream
using
the
streaming
semantics
I,
don't
know
why
that
wouldn't
work.
A
That's
from
a
Kara
TTX
question:
are
there
any
plans
for
karate
becoming
the
wiser
runtime
for
blazer?
At
some
point,
the
short
answer
is
no,
and
there
will
the
word
more
to
announce
regarding
the
future
of
the
various
dotnet
runtimes
this
year.
I
don't
have
anything
to
announce
today,
but
karate.
We
don't
have
any
plans
as
I'm
that
I'm
aware
of
to
turn
that
into
the
Wesson
runtime.
The
currently
blazer
uses
the
mono
runtime
in
the
client
and
for
the
time
being,
if
the
foreseeable
future.
A
To
think
of,
like
straw
man's
or
like
devil's
advocates
type
stuff,
it's
like.
Why
would
someone
not
be
able
to
install
it?
Man
if
you
have
a
I,
don't
know
it's
included
in
Visual
Studio
yeah
the
man
is
in
it
was
in
by
15
8.
It
was
included
by
default,
so
it's
there
now.
Lib
main
doesn't
do
much
have
to
point
it
at
a
provider
where
it
gets
the
files
from
that's,
usually
where
you
would
get
more.
Oh.