►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
B
B
C
B
B
A
A
B
B
C
B
B
C
B
C
B
A
B
A
A
B
Don't
get
it?
Oh
I'm!
Sorry,
hang
on
before
we
start
yeah
you.
This
is
the
first
time
where
you
have
hosted
this
John.
Yes,
you're
hosting
from
the
done
in
foundation
on
the
left-hand
side,
go
to
control
on
a
control
room.
Where
is
it?
We
need
you
to
go
to
the
cameraman
cameraman
suite
yes
and
then.
A
A
C
B
A
B
A
C
C
C
C
B
C
B
B
About
hi
I've
got
Auto
password,
whatever
in
Windows
I've
got
AA
fee
to
factor
auth
yep.
What
does
getting
a
B
key.
A
C
A
B
A
C
B
C
A
B
A
A
A
B
Gets
to
the
point
about
like
PGP
and
I,
can
someone
emailed
me
a
PGP
encrypted
email
recently
and
I
could
not
answer
and
I
was
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
heck's
going
on
they
had
looked
me
up
at
the
MIT
PGP
list
of
things.
C
B
C
C
C
B
B
A
C
Oh,
my
goodness,
it
was
such
a
great
day.
Is
that
good?
Oh,
my
goodness,
so
on
Friday,
a
group
of
us
from
work
took
the
day
off
and
paid
a
very
small
amount
of
money,
a
couple
under
bucks
to
go
to
the
local
racetrack,
where
BMW
put
on
what
they
call
their
in
performance
track
days
and
basically
they
bring
a
whole
bunch
of
very
expensive
BMWs.
We
get
to
drive
them
for
half
the
day
around
racetracks
with
professional
racecar
instructors.
C
It
also
included
some
drag
strip.
We
got
to
drag
like
$180,000
or
M
760
by
turbo
v12,
some
radicular
from
nothing
to
whatever
and
then
have
to
try
and
break
it
in
a
box.
At
the
end,
I
mean
we
got
to
go
around
the
laps.
You
know
of
the
track
very
fast
with
the
instructor
leading
strap.
It
was
a
lot
of
fun.
We
had
a
lot
a
lot
of
fun,
so
that
was
good,
no,
not
not
gadgets
as
such,
but
we
got
to
play
with
some
gadgets
that
we
didn't
have
to
worry
about.
Breaking.
B
C
C
B
B
C
C
C
C
C
It
big
enough
for
you,
though,
really
yeah
I
beat
him
at.
B
B
A
A
B
C
B
A
C
B
A
A
Right
so
Nate
publish
this
awesome
book
it.
It
is
called
the
little
asp
net
core
book,
but
it's
not
that
little.
It's
120
pages,
that's
so
yeah.
So
it
is
available.
You
can
read
it
online
here.
It
also
there's
a
PDF
and
you
can
directly
download
the
PDF
and
you
know,
like
I,
actually
brought
it
up
using
the
edge
PDF
reader
thing
and
it
was
like
reading
it.
Just
fine,
so
I
mean
it's,
it's
pretty
cool,
so
awesome
book.
He
goes
through
all
kinds
of
stuff
building
an
application
and
we
see
basics.
A
Absolutely
free
you
can
have
it.
This
is
just
a
neat
reminder
so
to
Burke,
announced
or
pointed
this
out
that
you
can
put
dash
dash
help
on
the
dotnet
commands.
So
I
think
that
we,
you
know
regularly
just
show
data
and
we're
typing
out
commands
and
people
watching
maybe
a
little
foot
off
by
like
oh,
how
do
I
remember
all
this
stuff
and
the
commands
are
pretty
like
you
can
explore
them
if
you
just
type
dotnet
new,
it
lists
the
different
available
templates.
B
There's
sub
help.
What
he's
saying
is
that
if
you
type
dotnet
new
help,
that's
different
than
dotnet,
that
is
help,
but
in
this
case
here
you're
getting
template
specific
help
for.
B
Example,
if
you
type
dotnet
new,
like
spa
razor
console
help,
then
you'll
find
that
there's
language
yeah
and
if
you
have
installed
the
dotnet
one
one
templates
for
oh,
you
can
go
framework
net
core
app
one
one
and
you
could
make
F
sharp.
You
can
make
100
one
wanting
to
do
whatever.
If
the
point
of
templates.
A
B
A
For
such.
A
C
Be
clear:
the
idea
here
was
there
was
a
bunch
of
as
now
that
we've
got
a
couple
of
releases
of
ace
from
their
core
out.
There
I've
changed
my
mind
over
time
about
what
I
thought
constituted
a
good.
What
was
a
good
Canada
for
attack
open
and
what
wasn't
and
so
I
wanted
to
have
a
place.
I
could
just
throw
a
bunch
of
these
ideas
into
a
single
package
that
people
could
pull
in
and
use
not
supported
by
us.
C
This
is
made
by
me,
but
you
know
we
could
get
feedback
at
least
through
some
channel
as
to
what
might
be
good
to
put
in
the
box.
So
for
two
point,
one
we're
already
talking
about
doing
the
field
template
tag
helpers,
so
you'll
get
editor
for
and
display
for,
and
those
type
of
display,
name
for
and
those
type
of
things
as
tag
helpers.
So
we
can
move
more
of
the
dynamic
generation
model
metadata
based
stuff.
C
A
C
Probably
do
script
in
lining,
maybe
I
love
the
if
tag
helper
but
I
know
some
people
like
vomit
at
the
idea
of
it.
I
mean
they're
just
wrong,
but
that's
okay,
it's
okay!
Being.
C
B
C
A
A
C
C
Helpers
will
go
in
now.
The
other
thing
is
that
this
library
works
all
the
way
down
to
a
spinet
called
100.
So
I
made
this.
This
library
also
serves
as
a
demonstration
of
how
to
build
a
tag,
helper
class
library
for
nougat
that
can
work
back
to
the
earliest
versions
of
a
spinet
core
and
all
the
way
through
all
right
so
like
it
serves
two
purposes.
It
lets
us
try
out
some
ideas
or
lets
me,
try
out
some
ideas
in
a
package
and
which
we
may
or
may
not
roll
into
the
box
in
the
future.
A
All
right
here
is
a
nice
I
think
12
minute
13-minute
video
from
Mark
Randall.
If
you
know
Mike
Randall
he's
he's
hilarious.
Presenter
he's
he's
a
lot
of
fun
to
watch,
so
he
goes
through
asp.
Net
core
Oh
in
docker
in
under
15
minutes,
builds
out.
A
lab
shows
off
stuff
like
compose,
and
you
know
just
explain
saying
so
if,
if
you've
watched
other
presentations
and
doctor
just
hasn't
sunk
in
for
you
or
if
you
just
want
to
have
a
lot
of
fun,
this
is
a
really
cool,
quick
overview,
so
say.
C
B
A
A
C
A
A
Anyone
that
takes
a
dependency
on
your
library
is
now
going
to
have
to
pull
in
all
those
libraries
yeah-
and
you
know
other
things
about
how
specifically
to
reference,
how
to
get
support
for
asp
net
core
all
again
by
not
referencing
the
big
meadow
package,
and
you
know
again
like
go:
go
down
to
the
lowest
possible
abstraction
or
a
lowest
possible
level.
You
can
to
make
it
easier
for
people
to
consume
yeah.
C
The
short
story
is
that,
if
you're
altering
libraries,
you
have
to
do
more
work
like
we
make
it
as
easy
as
possible
for
people
to
build
apps,
and
we
want
their
dependencies
to
be
as
minimal
and
simple
to
understand
as
possible
because,
let's
face
it,
the
vast
majority
of
people
are
using
our
stuff
to
build
apps,
not
libraries
for
the
for
the
select
few
who
eager
enough-
and
you
know
willing
enough
to
go
and
build
packages
for
other
people
to
consume
in
their
libraries.
You
have
to
do
more
work.
C
You
have
to
craft
the
package,
think
about
the
dependencies
go
down
to
that
lower
layer
and
really
think
about
what
I
need
to
say.
P
I
need
that
API.
If
I
use
this
API,
will
it
work
here
anymore
or
taking
this
dependency?
What
are
the
implications
on
absolutely
using
my
library,
like
you
really
have
to
think
about
building
a
class
library
for
reuse
and
so
there's
more
work
involved?
You
can't
just
add
a
reference
to
one
thing
in
you're
off
to
the
races.
C
A
Question
on
this-
and
this
is
a
random
idea-
I
haven't
thought
through
so
I'm
sure
it's
wrong,
but,
okay,
you
know
the
way
that
we
have
like
the
web.
Dev
checklist,
and
you
know
like
some
different
things
like
that,
where
we
can
take
a
look
at
some
common
mistakes,
you
might,
that
might
not
be
obvious.
Could
we
have
like
Rosalind
analyzers
or
something
that
could
look
and
be
like
hey?
You
know,
Clippy
pops
up
and
says:
hey
you're
referencing
is
peanut
core
all
we.
C
Could
well
you
could,
but
like
in
that
example,
might
be
a
little
pull
because,
as
he
points
out
like
you,
can't
even
reference
it
keep
talking
that
standard
like
it
fails
so
like
we
did.
We
tried
to
make
it
at
least
that
level
of
oh,
you
can't
use
this
because
it
doesn't
install
in
the
class
library
that
time
is
that
we
should
definitely
have
a
dock.
We
don't
even
have
a
dock
I
believe
right
now.
C
We
should
do
that
talks
about,
but
basically
this
blog
post,
but
a
formal
dog
because,
like
if
you're
authoring,
a
class
library
NuGet
package
to
extend
asp
net
core,
then
these
are
the
type
of
things
you
have
to
know.
How
do
you
go
about
setting
that
we
don't
have
a
project
template
for
it's?
One
of
the
things
that
we've
talked
about
for
the
next
release
is,
if
you
think,
back
to
asp.net
system
web,
we
have
templates
for
practically
everything
out
of
the
box.
You
wanted
to
build
like
a
custom
control.
There
was
a
template.
C
You
wanted
to
build
a
module
and
h2b
handler
and
h2b
module
class
lobby.
There
was
a
template,
like
you,
wanted
to
build
a
user
control.
There
was
an
item,
template,
etc,
etc.
We
don't
really
have
any
of
that
stuff
anymore.
We
really
went
through
a
template
rationalization
process
a
few
years
ago
as
part
of
the
1hp
net
effort,
which
I
think
was
good,
but
now
that
we
have
a
completely
new
platform
with
new
primitives
and-
and
you
know,
new
low-level
things
that
you
have
to
understand.
C
If
you
want
to
extend
it,
there
are
no
templates
for
any
of
those
things.
I
think
we
have
a
middleware
class
like
a
class
item
template
for
middleware
and
that's
about
it
like
maybe
a
tag
helper
one,
but
there's
no
create
me
a
tag,
helper
class
library,
project,
template
or
crazy
filter.
For
example,
we.
B
B
C
A
C
Install
a
barrier
that
I
don't
want
people
to
go
through
to
do
things
like
I
got
at
a
call,
but
I
want
to
share
it
right.
So
we
were
also
doing
other
things
that
I'm
not
quite
ready
to
share
yet,
but
we're
working
on
a
thing
which
I
hope
to
be
able
to
show
people
soon.
John.
You
know
about
this
Scott
I've
talked
about
before
that
will
hopefully
make
it
much
easier
for
people
to
get
up
and
going
when
they
have
a
great
light,
bulb
idea
for
extending
dotnet
in
some
way.
C
A
A
rush
I've
still
got
a
few
more
to
go
through
yeah
we've
got
two
boats
on
F
sharp
functional
web
applications,
so
this
is
Scott's,
so
Scott
went
through
and
took
a
pretty
good,
in-depth,
look
at
building
an
application
with
giraffe
and
then
I
don't
know
if
Phillip
had
to
one
up
here
or
something,
but
he
wrote
like
this
is
just
a
very
long,
in-depth
one,
big
application
here
as
well.
So
great
great
examples.
This
is
working
code
and
you
know
explaining
step-by-step.
What
do
you
yeah
and.
B
Something
actually
worth
pointing
out
is:
if
you
go
to
safe,
stack,
github
dot
IO,
they
are
there
that
they're
building
a
stack
there's
a
rather
than
kind
of
an
asp.net
focus
stack.
It's
kind
of
a
F
sharp
functional
stack,
so
suave
as
your
fable
and
elvish
mm-hmm.
B
B
A
A
B
A
Unstuff
so
Jack
I've
called
out
a
few
of
his
in
the
past,
he's
been
going
through
and
just
looking
through
the
asp
net
repository.
So
here
he's
digging
into
razor
pages
some
of
this
stuff's
covered
in
the
docs,
but
it's
always
nice
to
have
kind
of
a
fresh
look
at
it.
And
you
know
what
he's
found
and-
and
so
here
he's
kind
of
going
through
razor
pages,
explaining
what
it
is,
how
to
get
it
set
up
and
and
dealing
with.
C
Worth
pointing
out
to
that
we're
continuing
to
flush
out
the
docs
on
razor
pages
and
yeah
he's
been
at
core
in
general,
so
I
think
there's
been
a
couple
of
new
articles
that
have
gone
live
recently.
I
think
this
was
a
file
upload
tutorial
now
of
how
to
do
file
upload
with
razor
pages
and
we're
about
to
start
putting
together
a
unit
testing
with
razor
pages,
a
doc
as
well
so
nice
yeah.
C
A
It's
a
chart
where
it
goes
through
and
explains
kind
of
how
he
you
know
started
with
a
kind
of
more
advanced.
So
this
is
the
actual
website.
He's
got
a
running
instance
of
the
site
and
you
can
go
through
and
do
some
kind
of
advanced
query
and
sorting
and
filtering.
This
is
using
ten
thousand
records
and
it's
you
know
it's
pretty
much
instant.
A
So
it's
kind
of
cool
to
see
how
you
know
how
he's
done
this
he's
kind
of
said.
Okay,
here's
where
I
started
with
this
is
the
naive
implementation.
Then
I
went
through
and
wrote
some
custom
DB
functions,
you
know
and
kind
of
kept
working
through
and
it
eventually
ended
up
with
caching.
What
I
love
with
this,
too,
is
here.
He
he
kind
of
explained
in
this
table
the
effort
versus
rewards
for
the
different
parts
of
it.
So
you
know
here's
this.
A
You
know
getting
started
few
days
after
DB
function,
half
day,
big
big,
you
know
big
turnaround
on
you
know
significant
performance
improvement
and
then
talking
about
you
handwritten
sequel
and
cash
values
and
kind
of
effort
to
reward
on
that,
but
very
cool
to
see,
and
also
really,
you
know
neat
to
see
just
the
how
quick
it
is.
You
know,
as
you
kind
of
go
through
and
see
it
all
live.
So
that's
that's
a
EF
core
and
action
calm.
A
Alright,
two
last
things
to
wrap
up
with
this
is
so
dotnet
Kampf
tons
of
content
a
lot
a
lot
of
good
stuff
there.
Of
course
we
just
had
this
last
week.
If
you
go
through,
if
you're
just
interested
in
is
peanut
core,
you
can
go
through
and
filter.
So
there's
a
there's
a
filters
here
and
you
can
just
click
on
is
peanut
core
and
boom.
You
know
this
is
this
is
a
good
list
of
where
to
get
started.
So
all
the
videos
are
up
a
lot
of
good
stuff.
A
You
know
talking
about
you,
know
all
kinds
of
getting
started
contents
and
what's
new,
with
asp
net
core
two
with
Dan
Roth.
So
this
is
a
great
one
from
Bleacher
Report
talking
about
actually
serving
a
million
monthly
users
with
with
dotnet.
You
know,
just
just
more
and
more
a
buried,
buried
or
ins
talking
about
asp
net
core
to
security,
so
lots
of
good
stuff
I.
A
Had
some
people
remind
me.
People
were
on
Twitter
saying
how
do
I
download
the
videos
to
watch
offline
on
my
commute
or
whatever-
and
someone
was
pointed,
pointed
a
link
to
something
I'd
forgotten
about
I
posted,
a
gist
about
a
downloader
for
that
so
I
actually
got
around
to
putting
this
up.
You
can,
if
you
just
a
lot
of
people,
don't
use
PS
or
yes,
yet
PowerShell
gallery,
if
you
just
from
the
command
line,
type,
install
scripts
and
then
the
name
so
I
did
channel
nine
downloader.
A
Then
you
get
this
this
downloader
thing,
and
so
you
know,
I
just
hit,
enter
I,
updated
the
default
feeds
and
everything
and
it
just
boom
boom
boom
started
downloading
and
it
does
some
nice
stuff.
It
shows
a
progress
bar
and
stuff
like
that.
So,
however,
you
want
to
watch.
I'm
gonna
get
them.
It
isn't.
A
A
A
A
C
A
A
A
C
C
A
C
Anymore,
because
the
stuff
we
try
to
do
is
basically
impossible
to
get
right,
and
so
we
just
don't
do
it
and
we
leave
it
up
to
your
app
it's
it's
so
different
per
app.
What
the
right
thing
is
to
do
that
we
removed
a
bunch
of
opinions
and
just
said
no,
you
need
to
write
code
to
do
what
is
correct
for
your
scenario,
so
they
don't
look
at
the
points
on
people
and
we
still
figure
stuff
out.
This
is
just
the
initial
alpha.
Things
will
change,
but
we'll
talk
about
next
week,
yeah.
A
Yeah
yeah
so,
and
if
people
have
specific
things
they
want
to
see
or
whatever
I
guess
we
asked
early
enough,
you
know
we
could
we
could
we
could
request
file,
show
it
off
or
whatever
yeah.
C
Thank
you.
Community
was
great
today,
that's
what
a
lot
of
links
actually
do.
I
know
I'm.
Just
looking
at
the
the
chat,
yeah
I've
been
answering
a
couple
of
questions.
I
was:
can
someone
else
specifically?
Are
there
any
plans
to
remove
Bower
from
the
default
templates
and
I
said?
I
would
address
that
because
we
have
been
having
discussions
about
this
very
recently,
so
the
current
lowercase
P
plan
of
record
plan,
not
promises,
is
that
we
would
remove.
Bower
is
effectively
dead,
I,
don't
think
I'm
taking
anything
out
of
order.
C
There
Bower
is
effectively
done
right,
so
it's
actually
worse
than
done
rates
dead
like
it's
basically
going
away.
We're
gonna
remove
Bower
from
the
templates
in
an
upcoming
servicing
release,
hopefully
this
year.
So
before
the
end
of
the
year,
we'll
do
a
patch
release
of
dotnet
core
2
and
in
there
the
new,
a
spinet
core
templates
will
be
basically
changed
to
not
have
a
bower
file
anymore.
C
We
will
not
replace
them
with
anything
else
yet,
but
the
plan
would
be
after
that,
sometime
early
next
year,
we
would
look
at
productizing,
manses
pacman
feature
which
is
not
going
to
be
its
name,
but
that
was
the
working
title.
While
he's
been
working
at
the
last
couple
years,
he
demoed
this
a
build
I
think
this
year
or
last
year
it's
it's
basically
away
in
Visual,
Studio
and
integrated
into
the
project
file.
C
To
specify
that
you
want
to
take
a
dependency
on
some
client
packages
like
client-side
libraries,
and
then
he
can
fetch
those
from
a
CDN
so
like
something
like
CD
nsj
or
indeed,
just
a
file
share
or
any
random
URL
that
you
can
figure
in
your
project
and
then
they
will
be.
You
know
copied
in
geo
into
your
project
or
study
files,
and
you
can
also
tell
it
you
know
what
destination.
So
you
can
say
all
the
sources
here,
but
I
want
you
to
move
it
into
this
folder.
C
Specifically,
we
just
typically
and
traditionally
always
been
the
issue
that
we
run
into.
Is
that
how
do
you
without
ratcheting
up
the
complexity?
Count
to
11
I
just
want
to
get
some
files.
I
want
more
go
in
this
folder
right,
like
I,
want
jQuery
and
jQuery
validator
I
want
bootstrap
and
I
want
to
come
other
things
and
I
want
to
put
them
in
their
own
folders
like
doing
that
from
first
perimeters
to
something
like
gulp
and
Bower.
C
As
you
know
the
dependencies
of
your
app
change
over
time,
and
so
we're
looking
at
privatizing
that
set
of
features
so
there'll
be
a
nice
visual
studio,
experience
for
managing
client-side
libraries,
it'll,
be
provider
based,
and
we
would
likely
ship
the
CDN
j/s
provider
and
the
file
system
provider.
Out
of
the
box.
C
You
know,
jump
the
complexity
bridge
over
into
something
like
web
pack
or
gulp,
or
what
are
your
an
NPM
script,
or
something
like
that,
and
indeed
we
could
do
that
in
such
a
way
that
you
don't
even
see
that,
like
you
could
simply,
we
could
do
a
first-class
NPM
provider.
So
the
in
your
for
example.
Again,
it's
all
just
like
pseudo
ideas
right
now
in
your
CS
prajak
and
Eclair
a
client
package
reference.
Just
like
you
declare
a
package
reference
today
for
NuGet.
C
Imagine
you
could
declare
a
client
package
reference
with
a
name
and
a
version
and
then
based
on
what
provider
you
had
configured
or
maybe,
if
it
was
the
default,
it
would.
Oh
it
would.
Oh
I
can
get
them
an
NPM,
it'll
download
it
for
you,
it'll
screw
it
all
the
way
in
node
modules
and
I'll
move
it
into
the
target.
C
Folder
in
dub-dub
root
a
/lib
for
you
in
an
a
spinet
core
app
by
default,
and
it
would
all
be
configured
in
your
project
file,
you're,
sort
of
masking
the
whole
having
to
deal
with
NPM
directly
or
you
could
make
it
just
a
simple
file
copy.
So
that's
what
we're
looking
at
doing
is
basically
migrating
from
Bower
to
this
new,
not
a
package
manager
thing
which
is
built
into
the
project
system
via
Emma's,
build
so
that
you
get
the
capability
plugging
into
whatever
you
like
or
if
you
just
want
to
use.
C
Obviously,
if
you
just
use
NPM
or
web
pack
and
do
your
anything,
you
could
obviously
just
do
that
as
well.
We
already
do
that
in
SP,
spire
templates
today
or
use
NPM
and
web
pack,
because
that
is
the
first-class
experience
when
using
the
spire
frameworks
that
we've
integrated
with
whether
angular
or
react
or
redux
or
a
view,
but
before
you
get
to
that
level,
if
you're
not
doing
spires
and
we
think
there
is
a
gap
there,
that
can
be
addressed
with
a
simple
set
of
functionality.
C
C
So
I
haven't,
we
haven't,
got
to
the
point
yet
where
people
have
been
asking
for
a
road
map
update
we're
still
working
through
some
stuff
internally
before
we
can
do
that.
I
hope
to
have
that
done
in
the
next
few
weeks.
It
really
just
it's
conference
season
at
the
moment,
like
there's
been
Donny
Kampf
is
ignite,
is
on
right
now,
so
it's
all
been
to
be
black
at
Orlando,
and
so
there's
been
a
bit
of
a
delay
in
us
getting
through
the
planning
process,
and
so
we're
still
doing
that
in.
A
C
So
we've
already
started
on
on
certain
things
and
people
who
were
eagle-eyed
on
the
repos
will
know
that
already,
like
the
obviously
works
going
on
and
some
things,
but
some
of
the
larger
items
like
I,
said
I
sort
of
kind
of
held
up
in
that
planning
process,
but
we'll
get
that
out
soon.
Yes,
so
Christian
just
mentioned
cod
cod
with
a
wink,
which
is
the
codename
for
one
of
the
desires.
I
think
I've
talked
about
it
on
here
before
we
want.
We
want
to
provide
an
outer
box
experience
for
a
more
complete
HTTP,
API
story.
C
You
know
with
proper
client,
referencing
and
code
generation,
and
you
know
first-class
your
best-in-class
open
API
support
the
swagger
support
those
type
of
things
without
you
really
having
to
think
about
it.
Goi
go
find
you
a
spin,
your
core
API
HT,
API
application.
I
get
all
this
stuff
out
of
the
box
by
default,
so
we're
looking
at
integrating
integrating
with
some
third
parties,
we're
looking
at
adding
some
new
types
to
MVC
to
make
those
things
better
yeah
it
should
be.
We've
talked
about
as
well.
Obviously
so
for
Kestrel
is
happening,
I,
don't
think.
C
There's
any
plans
for
each
db2
for
each
to
be
client
in
the
next
release,
that
I'm
aware
of
Vlad,
but
definitely
for
Kestrel.
That
work
has
already
begun
and
we're
working
with
the
dotnet
team
who
need
to
provide
some
platform
level.
Api
is
for
us
to
do
that
correctly.
Kodkod
is
not
an
Aussie
named
it.
Actually,
it
was
actually
Ryan
on
the
MBC
team
who
named
it.
So
sorry,
it
wasn't
me
who
came
up
with
that
code
name.
The
other
thing
that's
been
kicking
around
is
kicker
which
Glenn
has
put
together.
C
This
is
our
effort
to
have
better
support
out
of
the
box
for
a
lot
of
the
concerns
that
come
up
in
sort
of
massively
distributed
micro
services.
Applications
where
you
start
breaking
up
your
apps
into
lots
of
you
know
logical
little
apps
and
run
them
as
micro
services,
and
now
you
have
shared
concerns
when
you
have
apps
like
that,
like
you
want
to
do,
distributed
tracing
distribute
the
configuration
distributed.
Logging
you
want
to
do
service
discovery.
You
want
to
do
outgoing
HTTP
decorators.
C
You
want
to
do
a
whole
bunch
of
stuff
I
health
checks
to
integrate
with
some
orchestration
layer,
and
there
are
established
third-party
or
industry
solutions
for
these
things,
and
indeed
many
of
our
customers
are
using
them
already
with
a
spinette
core
today,
but
we
didn't
provide
the
integrations
for
those
out-of-the-box.
You
know
we
didn't
build
the
service
and
we
didn't
provide
the
integration
with
a
spinet
core.
So
that's
something
we're
looking
at
in
the
next
version
as
well
as
how
can
we
again
bridge
that
gap
like?
C
Sorry
we're
looking
at
improving
the
a
NCM
or
a
spinet
core
module,
which
is
the
type
of
is
that
hosts
a
spinet
core
applications,
so
we're
looking
in
a
new
mode
for
that
that
you
can
opt
into
that
changes.
The
hosting
model
that
Redoute
reduces
the
moving
parts
which
hopefully
will
result
in
a
much
better
performance
and
more
reliability.
It
has.
C
You
know
token
servers
whether
it's
you
know
just
manual
job
token
issuing
or
full
STS
server,
stuff
and
OAuth
server
stuff.
There's.
How
do
we
make
HTTP
the
default
so
file?
New,
a
spinet
core
gives
you
HTTP
working
through
all
the
experience
problems
and
enabling
that
it's
not
trivial,
like
either
certs
involved
and
it's
different
on
every
platform.
So
we
need
to
work
through
ways
of
making
that
simple.
C
We
also
need
to
ensure
that
configuring
things
like
HTTP
ports
for
the
server
can
be
done
in
a
natural
way
as
you
move
from
environmental
environment,
if
it's
all
in
code
that
doesn't
change
well
from
environment
to
environment.
Typically,
you
put
that
stuff
in
config
files.
So
how
do
we
make
that
as
easy
as
possible?
What
else?
Oh
yeah?
C
The
spa
templates,
someone
just
asked
Brian
just
asked
adding
authentication
options
to
the
spa
templates,
we're
doing
that
as
well,
so
you'll
be
able
to
when
creating
a
new
spa
application
choose
you
know:
Azure
b2c
or
identity,
our
own
identity
system,
or
even
perhaps
bringing
an
identity
server.
If
Dominick
and
Braque
integrate
with
this,
so
you
can
build
an
angular
application
using
a
spinet
course
fire
services
and
do
authentication
as
well,
because,
obviously
you
can
have
to
do
that
and
do
it
in
the
correct
sort
of
idiomatic
way.
So
we're
looking
at
that
as
well.
C
So,
for
example,
today,
when
you
use
MVC,
it
adds
routing
to
the
pipeline,
but
only
MVC
can
see
that
router.
So,
if
you're,
not
in
MVC
or
after
it-
and
you
want
to
get
a
URL
for
something
in
MVC
you're
out
of
luck
like
you-
can't
get
in
and
get
the
routing
that
MVC
added.
So
we
want
to
fix
that
problem
so
that
no
matter
what
middleware
is
running
where
or
what
subsystem
is
plugged
into
your
pipeline,
they
all
get
to
see
the
details
of
every
endpoint.
C
That's
been
configured
in
your
application
through
the
dispatching
rules,
with
all
the
metadata
about
those
endpoints
about
you
know
what
URLs
they
match,
what
what
pattern
they
were
registered
with
what
parameters
they
capture,
what
response
types
they
support
all
that
type
of
stuff
so
that
you
can
do
things
like
URL
generation
from
anywhere
in
the
application.
This
is
one
of
these
big
things
that
we
think
we
have
to
solve
to
really
make
it
easier
to
work
inside
this
sort
of
middleware,
nested,
middleware,
composition
pipeline,
so
that's
happening
in
2.1
as
well,
or
the
next
release.
C
Whatever
in
to
me
what
else?
Yes,
a
christian
house,
does
that
mean
you
can
reason
about
author
requirement
to
such
a
4-ounce?
Yes,
that's
exactly
the
type
of
thing
so
that
you
can
have
an
endpoint,
that's
annotated
with
metadata
like
this
endpoint
needs,
authentication
or
authorization.
This
is
the
policy
it
needs,
and
then
that
goes
into
the
dispatching
table.
And
then
anyone
in
any
point
can
ask
oh,
does
this
endpoint
over
here
require
authorization,
and
if
it
does,
can
you
give
me
the
details
of
that
please,
so
that
I
can
make
a
decision
about
it.
C
Because
of
that
yeah
we're
gonna,
add
we're
gonna,
add
authorization
and
authentication
options,
the
spy
templates
as
well
we're
getting
some
good
feedback
on
the
idea
of
the
dispatcher.
So
that's
good,
so
it
seems
people
are
doing
this
a
lot
right
now
and
they
have
to
do
it
manually
inside
their
middleware,
which
is
not
fun
at
all.
So
this
will
hopefully
make
that
easier
for
a
lot
of
people
yeah,
nothing
else
on
the
top
of
my
head,
as
I
said,
more
details
will
become
public
soon,
as
we
get
through
the
end
of
this
process.
C
C
B
C
So
that's
happening,
I
picked,
I
just
came
in
a
meeting
on
that,
so
pipelines
is
still
slated
to
be
in
the
next
release:
it'll
be
used
by
Kestrel
and
a
spirit
core
and
signal.
So
we
just
need
to
figure
out
what
layer
it
ships
in
and
all
that
type
of
stuff.
C
Service
out
of
a
Kestrel
app,
yes,
I
should
have
mentioned
that.
Thank
you
for
the
prompt,
so
the
dotnet
team
has
or
is
about
to
or
has
just
released
a
preview
of
the
windows.
Compatibility
pack
name
to
be
determined
final
end
to
be
determined,
which
is
effectively
a
way
as
a
set
of
packages
with
a
meta
package
I
to
bring
them
all
in.
That
adds
a
bunch
of
api's
back
if
you're
running
net
core
on
windows.
So,
for
example,
it
brings
back
system
drawing
and
it
brings
back
system
directory
services.
C
C
Yes,
so
some
yeah
needs
mentoring
that
the
capella
Deepak
was
in
dotnet
cough.
So
yes,
so
that
also
includes
server
space.
So
that's
the
ability
to
write
Windows
services
using
dotnet,
so
now
that's
being
ported
into
a
package
that
runs
on
eight
core.
Our
existing
a
spinet
core
service
hosting
package,
which
we
have
today
for
dotnet
framework,
will
be
updated
to
support
dotnet
cause
you'll,
be
able
to
write
a
Windows
service
and
run
on
dotnet
core
very
soon,
okay,
so
we're
doing
that
work.
C
So
we're
doing
it
to
support
to
oh,
you
won't
have
to
wait
for
the
next
sort
of
you
know,
2.1
or
minor,
or
major
release,
we're
going
to
release
this
package
separately
and
then
you'll
be
able
to
use
WS
fade
in
your
HP
net
core
to
our
application.
So
we
hope
to
have
that
out
in
the
next
month
or
two.
So
that's
going
on
as
well.
C
C
C
So
that's
just
you
know
a
whole
other
train,
like
the
servicing
train,
where
we
roll
out
patches
is
different
to
the
adding
features
train
where
we
either
do
separate
packages
as
what
we
call
a
tab
and
releases
or
the
next
actual
version
of
the
framework
like
a
2.1
or
something
like
that
which
is
longer-term
but
yeah
a
much
bigger
release.
So
yeah,
it's
all
going
on.
It's
all
good.
All.