►
From YouTube: DXdao Community Call [2021-10-07]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
We
did
this
in
an
effort
to
regularly
and
consistently
involve
the
community
and
the
fun
and
interesting
dx
dao
information
and
discussion
we
have
going
on
today
we're
going
to
be
touching
on
a
a
couple
of
brief
squad
updates,
particularly
dx,
gov
dev
and
dx
ventures,
we'll
be
calling
attention
to
the
q3
discord,
rep
boost,
discussing
swapper
arbitrage
from
e-cop,
epoch,
3
and
touching
on
the
officially
resumed
dxd
buybacks.
A
Let's
start
with
the
squad
updates.
Here
we
have
dx
gov
dev
folk
around.
I
know
we
have
a
couple
traveling,
but
it
sounds
like
ross
will
be
available
here.
A
I
think,
having
some
connection
issues,
maybe.
C
Okay
right,
so
you
can
hear
me
as
well,
then
yes,
correct.
Okay,
I
have
to
do
this
without
audio,
because
dave's
got
the
audio
of
the
thing
I'm
speaking
into
and
then
oh
wait.
No,
it's
fine!
Oh!
This
is
a
mess.
Sorry.
C
Okay,
yeah
so
I'll
give
a
quick
update
on
dxgov
dev
stuff.
So
I
don't
think
we've
had
an
official
update
on
the
community
call
yet
for
this
so
I'll
just
start
from
the
beginning.
Essentially,
we've
been
building
well.
The
most
recent
update
you'll
have
seen
will
have
been
from
augusto.
C
He
gave
a
demo
through
the
app
he's
been
building
for
a
good
few
months.
Now
this
is
our
governance,
application
to
replace
alchemy
so
that
we
have
additional
control
over
our
voting
machine
and
the
ui
for
that,
allowing
us
to
expand
our
governance
platform
essentially
to
whatever
we
want,
but
we
now
have
an
official
gov
dev
team.
So
it's
gone
from
one
member
to,
I
believe
now,
five
active
contributors
working
full
time
on
the
on
the
application,
so
we've
developed
a
road
map
I'll
put
that
in
the
chat
afterwards.
C
I
wasn't
around
to
prepare
it
beforehand
and
if
anyone
wants
to
walk
through
that,
I
know
there's
a
recording
of
the
initial
demonstration.
We
did
there
as
well.
C
So
the
first
steps
we'll
be
doing
are
mostly
around
guilds
for
swapper
token,
as
well
as
dxd
token,
and
just
a
lot
of
ui
ux
improvements,
since
the
the
app
was
built,
mostly
as
a
sort
of
proof
of
concept.
Mvp,
initially,
there's
a
there's,
a
lot
of
work
to
do
in
the
ui
to
make
it
a
much
better
experience
for
the
entire
dx
style
organization.
C
C
Also,
the
the
main
goal
as
well
of
creating
the
application,
as
well
as
having
more
control
specifically,
is
to
move
forward
with
gaff
2.0,
which
we
had
a
signal
proposal
for
a
number
of
months
ago
that
went
through,
but
we
haven't
really
moved
on
with
it
from
a
development
perspective.
But
now
with
the
full
team,
we'll
be
we're
pushing
forward
to
this,
and
you
should
hear
some
more
updates
soon
about
the
the
status
of
that
and
how
we're
getting
along
and
hopefully
soon
we'll
have
that
properly.
A
Excellent.
Thank
you
very
much
ross.
Of
course,
any
open
questions
feel
free
to
shoot
in
the
chat
and
or
request
to
speak.
D
Hey
guys
so
just
giving
some
updates
on
kind
of
what
dx
ventures
slash
the
biz
dev
squad's
been
up
to
so
our
first
allocation
from
the
dx
ventures.
Initial
budget
of
the
one
million
allocation
was
to
opolis
and
they're
working
on
kind
of
like
a
new
way
to
pay
contractors
that
work
in
web3,
specifically
like
anything
to
do
with
crypto
d5,
especially.
D
We
thought
it
was
an
interesting
project
and
we
just
received
our
tokens
a
few
weeks
ago.
The
tokens
are
actually
located
on
an
alternative
chain,
so
we've
been
kind
of
figuring
out
what
to
do
with
the
tokens
whether
or
not
we
want
to
stake
them
in
opolis's
current
staking
system,
which
would
then
kind
of
accrue
more
tokens
as
rewards,
and
eventually
we
could
use
those
tokens
in
governance
at
a
certain
point,
or
we
can
actually
put
the
tokens
into
a
pool.
D
Some
other
stakeholders
and
community
members
in
opolis
have
opted
to
pool
their
tokens.
I
believe
on
mainnet,
as
well
as
some
considerations
for
arbitrary
as
well,
maybe
even
on
swapper,
so
sky
actually
has
been
like
updating
a
post
on
our
dow
talk
forum
regarding
this
and
just
trying
to
get
feedback
from
everyone
in
the
community.
Regarding
you
know
what
people
think
would
be
the
best
option.
D
It
would
seem
like
right
now
we
would
probably
get
more
like
yield.
I
guess
you
can
say
by
just
staking
the
tokens
in
governance
through
opolis,
but
there's
still
other
options
that
might
be
cool
long
term
like
with
swapper,
and
things
like
that.
So
yeah
take
a
look.
If
you
have
any
feedback
or
comments
on
that,
this
is
actually
just
the
first
allocation.
D
The
tokens
are
going
to
be
vesting
from
opolis
from
our
initial
kind
of
grant
investment
over
the
next.
I
believe,
two
years.
So
that's
the
first
update
the
other
updates
are
we.
I
think
we
had
a
biz,
dev
kind
of
dx
ventures
proposal
from
thesis.
D
D
We
kind
of
did
like
an
alternative
proposal
set
up
this
time,
we're
trying
to
like
get
people
more
informed
about
basically
the
pitches
before
we
do
them
just
so,
people
can
have
like
good
questions
and
kind
of
get
the
conversation
started
so
anfibali
who's,
like
kind
of
the
main
point
of
contact
for
chambers,
put
the
pitch
up
and
dow
talk.
D
I
you
know
welcome
everyone
to
take
a
look
but
basically
they're
trying
to
do
an
improved
version
of
like
a
dow
governance
data
platform
so
trying
to
have
like
unbiased
data
on
governance
for
daos
as
like
metrics,
basically
that
dxdow
could
use
on
our
own
governance,
as
well
as
other
platforms
that
have
different
types
of
dow
governance
associated
with
them
and
to
see
how
active
engaged
the
community
is.
Aside
from
that,
I
think
there's
some
interesting
updates
with
eth
global
I'm
not
as
involved
with
that
project.
D
I
know
we're
working
on
that
as
well,
so
if
anyone
else
on
stage
has
any
info
during
regarding
that
you're
welcome
to
jump
in,
but
otherwise
that's
like
the
main
update,
like
dx
ventures,
is
just
kind
of
chugging
along.
So
if
there's
any
interesting
projects
that
anyone's
aware
of
or
anyone
else,
you
think
that
would
be
a
good
fit
for
the
community
to
get
a
grant.
Let
us
know.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
tammy,
not
sure
if
anyone
had
any
info
for
ethonline.
I
know
skye
was
kind
of
the
lead
coordinator
for
that
and
he
won't
be
able
to
make
it
today.
A
Go
ahead
first,
one
is,
I
guess,
somewhat
answered
by
yourself
already,
but
are
there
any
other
interesting
projects
on
dx
ventures,
radar.
D
Yeah,
so
I
actually
did
a
while
back
a
post,
and
this
is
when
I
say
a
while
back.
I
think
it
was
like
a
month
and
a
half
ago
from
eth
paris,
we
actually
participated
in
the
quote:
unquote
like
vc
e3c
round,
just
as
a
dow,
of
course,
so
we're
giving
out
grants
we're
not
like
traditional
vc.
D
So
there's
quite
a
few
interesting
projects
from
that.
Some
of
them,
I
think,
are
still
open
rounds,
but
a
lot
of
them.
Of
course,
at
this
point,
are
closed
off
one
project.
D
I'm
I'm
personally
interested
in
that
I'm
brainstorming
on
is
this
metaverse
project
called
atlantis
world
they're,
basically
creating
like
a
two
day,
2d
option
for
like
metaverse
avatars
for
d5,
so
there's
actually
a
lot
of
really
cool
builds
that
are
happening
right
now
within
atlantis
world,
with,
like
urine
ave
they're,
all
basically
trying
to
gamify
ways
to
like
attach
d5
projects
to
the
metaverse
in
like
an
easy
uploadable
format.
D
So
I've
been
exploring
with
atlantis
world
basically
a
way
to
connect
our
products
like
swapper
omen,
eventually
carrot
to
this
metaverse
to
kind
of
onboard
through,
like
a
rabbit
hole,
type
of
like
learning,
gamification
process
to
like
get
people
more
interested
in
d5.
A
Yeah,
I
do
have
one
more
here-
I
guess
maybe
not
directly
relevant
to
you,
but
is
there
an
update
on
dxtau
polygon
integration
to
interact
with
opolis.
D
So
I
think
that's
more
of
a
technical
question.
I
don't
think
we're
like
executing
that
something
that
we
have
discussed,
that
I
think's
super
interesting
and
kind
of
overlaps,
not
just
with
opolis
but
other
dxventures
kind
of
projects.
An
example
is
atlantis
world.
Their
base
is
actually
on
polygon,
they're,
expanding
to
main
net
and
eventually
to
arbitrary,
which
we
have
some
interest
in.
But
the
idea
is
that
you
know
if
we
actually
do
create
some
sort
of
base
on
polygon.
D
It's
a
great
opportunity
for
the
dx
dow
based
on
polygon,
whether
you
know
we're
really
trying
to
focus
our
resources
right
now.
Technically
speaking,
so
it's
kind
of
like
a
big
we
need
to
coordinate
and
make
sure
we
can
actually
execute
on
that.
Otherwise,
we're
gonna
have
to
figure
out
another
alternative,
less
decentralized,
which
is
not
as
optimal
way
to
deal
with
the
opolis
base.
A
B
Yeah,
just
echoing
what
tammy
said
in
addition
to
that,
just
the
general
overhead,
even
from
like
the
governance
side
of
things
that
it
takes
to
deploy
a
new
base,
I
think
we're
still
trying
to
get
like
the
legs
under
dx
vote
on
the
arbor
drum,
and
you
know
it
makes
sense
to
kind
of
get
that
operating
more
efficiently
and
like
stably,
and
then
we
can
maybe
think
about
what
the
next
step
would
be
in
terms
of
further
based
deployment.
B
But
I
think
yeah,
like
utilizing
some
of
the
multi-sigs
that
are
in
place
for
some
occasional
things
that
can't
be
done
with
the
governance
directly.
That
could,
I
think,
be
extended
to
polygon
as
well,
and
I
think
sky
was
looking
into
the
ability
to
deploy
gnosis
safe
with
the
same
address
across
multiple
chains.
B
So
I
think
that
is
also
in
the
works
which,
with
some
things
across
different
chains,
but
it
doesn't
really
solve
the
governance
problem
but
might
be
able
to
help
with
the
with
the
work
token
or
things
that
need
to
be
done
there.
I
mean
also
just
on
another
note,
it's
kind
of
funny
because
it
has
a
similar
name,
but
there's
a
project
that
I
think
is
also
pretty
cool.
That
tx
ventures
is
in
touch
with,
which
is
called
atlantis,
which
is
a
governance
framework
and
that's
sort
of
just
in
the
prototype
stage.
B
So
the
developers
putting
together
some
of
the
just
like
the
smart
contract
framework,
and
there
was
somebody
that
skye
got
in
touch
with
and
it
looked
promising,
but
we're
we're
kind
of
just
in
conversations
with
them
as
well.
A
Cool,
let's
chat,
discord,
rep
booths.
I
have
a
bit
of
a
a
spiel
here.
So
with
the
introduction
of
the
dx
discord
server,
an
initiative
was
proposed
to
get
more
community
members
involved
in
governance.
At
the
time
I
called
it,
a
governance
gateway
drug
which
I
thought
was
quite
fun.
A
This
is
called
the
dxdow
discord.
Rep
boost
they
function
as
a
quarterly
allocation
to
those
involved
in
the
community
kind
of
a
way
for
us
to
leave
the
door
open
to
those
involved
in
the
community
to
participate
in
our
governance.
A
We
had
a
first
and
second
round
in
q1
and
2
of
2021
those
both
went
successfully
and
had
majority
claims,
which
was
very
nice
to
see
and
as
of
a
couple
of
days
ago,
we're
back
again
for
quarter
three.
The
snapshot
was
taken
on
the
30th
of
september.
A
We
removed
distribution
to
level
one
and
had
some
slight
reductions
to
the
upper
and
lower
bounds,
and
this
is
reflected
in
the
signal
proposal
on
chain
now.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
grab
a
link
for
it
here.
A
A
If
your
name
is
found,
there
then
congrats
once
the
signal
proposal
passes
on
chain
you'll,
be
welcome
to
create
a
proposal
to
claim
your
rep
on
xdy.
This
will
obviously
be
done
through
a
discord
notification
to
start
we'll
be
granting
an
updated
guide
to
those
who
are
eligible.
A
The
entitlement
is
in
mainnet
rep,
but
it's
obviously
highly
advised
that
committee
members
request
their
rep
via
x.
The
x
down
x,
die
chain,
gas
fees
are
significantly
reduced
and
a
majority
of
the
contributor
and
signal
proposals
have
found
their
home
on
this
base.
For
the
past
couple
of
months,
anyone's
welcome
to
reach
out
to
myself
or
in
the
dxl
social
channels,
to
request
a
small
amount
of
xti
if
they
want
to
make
their
rep
requests
and
don't
have
any.
A
I
see
level
10
hog
pink
hog
is
here
with
us,
so
that's
a
quick
call
of
attention
to
that
initiative.
Sorry
to
those
that
are
hard
stuck
level.
Seven
connor.
A
I
have
a
couple
questions
that
were
left
with
me.
The
rep
percentage
has
been
reproduced
each
quarter.
Why
is
this?
Obviously,
the
rep
percentage
has
to
be
moved
indicative
of
the
difficulty
of
reaching
the
level
at
the
start.
It
was
much
easier
to
reach
level
10
and
we
moved
that
requirement
down
and
similarly
to
the
lower
levels
we
made
those
a
bit
easier
to
obtain.
A
So
we
move
the
rep
allocation
down
slightly
to
accommodate
for
those
changes-
and
I
have
one
more
question
left
with
me:
has
the
discord
rep
boost
replaced,
regular
rut
boos?
A
Maybe
I'm
not
the
one
to
answer
that?
I'm
not
sure
if
chris
is
here,
chris
are
you
available
boom?
Did
I
just
get
up
on
stage.
F
Welcome
yeah,
I
think
so
I
think
primarily
that
was
because
before
we
started
the
rep
boost,
it
was
a
monthly
program
and
it
was
kind
of
more
on
the
forum
and
activity
on
the
forum
and
recognizing
people
there.
But
since
discord,
I
think
has
the
ability
to
capture
a
lot
of
the
activity
that
we
want
to
be
doing.
F
I
think
it's
a
little
bit
more
automated
way
of
doing
it,
although
I
do
think
we
should
still
be
doing
kind
of
rep
boost
nominations,
ad
hoc
for
different
types
of
actions
and
contributions
to
the
community,
people
recognizing
them
and
and
kind
of
sharing
it
to
the
community.
But
perhaps
the
automated
way
of
doing
it,
every
quarter
is
the
best
way
for
ensuring
we
get
like
the
wider,
broader
distribution.
A
A
F
Yeah
so
I
mean,
I
think,
a
lot
of
great
work
in
the
last.
I
guess
24
48
hours
really
over
the
last
week,
so
just
as
a
refresher
buyback
program
going
on
since
may
has
been
using
the
gp
relayer
on
both
mainnet
and
xdi,
but
now
just
on
xdi
and
that
relies
on
another
network
of
solvers
to
actually
match
the
trades.
And
there
were
some
issues
with
that.
F
The
community
has
gnosis
has
stopped
support
on
gnosis
protocol
v1,
so
it
makes
it
a
little
bit
more
difficult,
but
the
community
has
been
providing
that
infrastructure
itself
and
anyway,
the
last
the
last
week
and
a
half
to
kind
of
been
troubleshooting
and
finding
and
getting
that
back
online
and
just
yesterday
we
were
able
to
start
and
execute
those
orders
again,
and
I
think
the
proposals
have
already.
The
orders
have
already
been
filled
and
you
can
kind
of
see
the
results.
F
I
think
in
in
some
of
the
price
action
over
the
last
12
or
16
hours
on
dxd.
It
is
interesting
to
see
the
different
pools
of
dxd
and
how
they
interact
right,
because
arbitrary
obviously
is
the
biggest
dxd
eath
pool.
But
it's
really
hard
to
get
or
a
long
time
to
get
that
txd
out
of
arbor
trump,
so
a
lot
of
it
is
there.
Xti
is
like
the
smallest
of
the
dxd
pools,
but
that's
actually
where
the
buybacks
being
conducted.
F
So
it's
kind
of
like
there's
this
suction
on
dxd
from
xdi,
but
given
gas
cost,
especially
over
the
last
couple
days,
it's
making
bridging
between
those
pretty
difficult.
So
it's
just
a
dynamic,
I
think,
to
watch.
I
think
it
will
change
a
little
bit
too,
as
swapper
rewards
kick
in
on
x
die
next
thursday.
F
So
maybe
that
pool
is
a
little
bit
more,
but
it
really
right
now
you
can
see
as
the
the
anytime
there's
a
buyback,
the
price
kind
of
will
change,
and
you
know
there
will
be
some
type
of
arbitrage
opportunity
between
the
different
pools,
but
a
lot
of
it
depends
on
on
gas
prices
for
for
getting
between
those
and
but
yeah.
So
this
is
the
start
of
the
third
million
of
the
dxd
buybacks.
F
We
passed
the
the
signal
proposal
two
weeks
ago
and
then
we're
just
now
gearing
this
up,
so
we'll
have
updates
in
the
sheet
there
going
forward
and
then
yeah
there's
also
some
kind
of
chatter
about.
You
know
the
long-term
framework
for
the
buy-back
itself,
whether
that's
like
the
technical
implementation.
F
A
lot
of
the
conversation
of
the
last
week
was
what,
if
gpv
one
and
the
solvers,
don't
work,
what
are
our
other
options
so
there's?
Actually
a
post
in
the
forum
I
put
up
of
like
the
three
big
kind
of
options,
we're
considering
now
that
could
end
up
replacing
the
gp
relayer
as
the
method
to
conduct
the
buyback.
F
Those
are
still
like
a
work
in
progress
require
some
more
technical
work,
but
I
think
it's
important
that
we
expand
that
those
capabilities,
so
the
questions
on
how
we
kind
of
implement
and
execute
the
buyback
on
what
network
is
another
question
too,
and
then
there's
also
like
well,
what
are
the
what's?
The
framework
are
the
decisions
or
like
when
does
geeksdow
decide
to
do
a
buyback
and
in
what?
What
manner
and
kind
of
those
questions?
F
I
think
those
are
larger
questions
that
we
need
to
kind
of
think
on
and
probably
create
a
larger
framework
on.
A
Awesome,
thank
you
very
much,
chris
extending
an
open
invitation
to
connor
and
or
pink
hog,
who
are
very
commonly
involved
in
the
discussion
of
the
buyback,
if
you'd
like
to
hop
on
stage
feel
free
to
click
the
request
button.
Otherwise
I
do
have
some
questions
here
that
were
left
with
me.
F
Thanks
for
the
patience,
I
guess
over
the
last
two
weeks,
this
is
kind
of
putting
everything
together
with
like
the
gp
relay
or
there's
a
lot
of
different
pieces.
I
you
know,
I'm
not
really
familiar
with
everything,
but
just
seeing
all
the
little
pieces
that
have
to
be
put
together
to
execute
it
yeah.
It's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
fine
details.
A
Excellent
looks
like
connor
and
pink
hog
are
good
for
today,
starting
with
what
is
going
to
happen
to
the
four
or
five
buybacks
that
we're
ready
to
pass.
F
So
those
could
have
been
executed
whenever
right
and
when
they're
executed
they
would
just
look
at
the
swapper
weth
price,
I'm
sorry,
the
dxd
weath
price
on
swapper
and
place
an
order
at
that
price,
so
they
could
have
been
executed
when
they
were
passed.
Some,
I
think,
were
passed
like
on
monday,
tuesday.
It
looks
like
no
one
had
executed
them.
If
they
had
executed
them,
the
orders
could
have
been
placed,
but
they
wouldn't
have
been
able
to
be
filled
at
all.
F
So
I
think
right
now
of
the
last
two
days,
two
proposals,
I
believe,
buyback
proposals
that
passed
early
in
the
week
were
actually
executed
and
that's
like
the
buy
orders
that
you
see
on
on
mesa
and
why
there's
been
some
some
activity
there.
I
believe
there
was
one
more
that
can
be
executed
or
could
be
executed
and
then
there's
another
one.
That's
set
to
pass
in
36
hours
and
I
think
we
are
yeah
and
actually,
I
think,
just
within
the
last
30
minutes.
F
We
just
submitted
the
next
buyback
order
to
start
that.
So
there
I
think,
we're
there's
a
good,
steady
city
floor
then
I
think
we'll
be
coming
in
now
that
we've
got
everything
set
up.
F
A
Maybe
I'll,
let
you
maybe
take
a
look
after
this
last
question
and
you
can
post
sure
after
the
fact
one
last
one
here
with
me
has
a
proposal
passed
to
use
all
2500
each
from
the
buyback
reserve.
I
assume
they're
referring
to
utilizing
it
in
the
buyback.
F
Yeah
I
mean
there's
no
proposal
that
has
passed
that
has
moved
those
funds.
I
mean,
I
think,
the
way,
if
you
just
kind
of
step
back
and
look
at
it
on
like
a
technical
level,
the
buyback
reserve
or
the
dxd
contract
has
an
owner
and
that
owner
is
dx
dow,
so
geeksdale
could
upgrade
that
contract
and
take
the
take
the
heath
and
do
something
with
it.
F
So
I
think,
like
any
prop,
there
hasn't
been
a
proposal
that
has
done
that
and
I
think
that's
kind
of
the
ultimate
way
that
that
wherever
that
eth
goes,
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
on
like
how
exactly
that
gets
done.
And
what
is
the
accounting
for
that,
and
I
think
that
kind
of
ties
into
some
of
those
broader
questions
I
was
saying
before
about
when
and
under
what
conditions
is
like
dxd
being
repurchased
and
even
kind
of
getting
some
of
like
the
the
revenue
questions
from
the
the
products
like.
F
How
do
we
kind
of
create
a
more
like
tighter
framework?
Small,
like
tangent,
I've
just
been
thinking
about
this
a
little
bit.
There
has
been
a
lot
more
discussion.
I
think
in
some
of
the
communities
about
like
tokenomics,
I
saw
urine
just
put
something
out
there,
so
maybe
something
to
think
about
as
we
get
into
some
options
on
dxd
but
keenan.
F
To
answer
your
question,
I
think
there
is
some
a
lot
of
conversation
and
really
some
soft
consensus
in
the
community
on
the
buyback
on
what
on
that
buy
back
reserve
but
like.
Ultimately,
we
need
to
have
a
proposal
that
like
upgrades
the
contract
and
will
do
something
with
the
eth
and
that
will
when
we
do
that
proposal,
we'll
need
to
have
a
lot
of
details
figured
out.
A
Perfect,
thank
you.
I
have
one
more
question
here
from
thirf
noob
in
the
chat
he
asked.
Have
you
guys
discussed
about
a
way
to
avoid
a
void?
No
pun
intended,
I'm
sure
after
this
buyback
is
over
and
the
next
one,
if
approved,.
F
I
mean,
I
think
there
were
kind
of
two
issues
with
this
one
one.
We,
the
timing
for
the
extension,
was
a
little
delayed
like
there
was
like
a
you
know,
four
or
five
day
overlap,
and
that
just
it
actually,
because
the
the
the
one
million
actually
happened
sooner.
We
had
kind
of
projected
it
over
like
seven
weeks
and
it
ended
up
happening
in
like
five
weeks.
F
So
there
was
a
kind
of
four
or
five
delay
day
delay
in
when
the
extension
proposal
got
passed,
and
then
there
was
on
top
of
this,
like
kind
of
seven
day,
delay
in
terms
of
the
technical
working
and
hopefully
yeah
we
fixed
both
of.
F
Those
yeah-
and
I
think
the
you
know
the
more
we
I
think
that
you
know
take
a
step
back.
We
have
like
gotten
much
more
efficient
at
this
like
everybody
right,
even
the
people
like
following
the
buyback,
or
you
know
tracking
that
well
everyone
kind
of
understands
the
general
structure
of
how
this
is
like
implemented,
and
it
just
makes
things
running
things
a
lot
more
like
smoothly.
I'm
just
thinking
back
to
remember
in
june
when
we
were
just
first
doing
this.
F
I
think,
like
hedgehog,
had
a
comment,
because
the
order
time
we
had
was
like
a
week
instead
of
a
month
or
something
like
so
we
weren't
actually
leaving
the
orders
on
there
for
that
long
and
that
just
made
like
perfect
sense.
We
didn't
really
realize
that,
but
it
was
only
kind
of
through
doing
it
and
adjusting
and
iterating
on
things
that,
like
we
got
better,
and
so
I
think
going
forward
with
the
buy
back
here
like
I
think
we
are
getting
more
efficient
and
at
executing
it,
and
I
think
that
will
continue.
A
G
A
Sarah
says
why
token
split,
I
think
the
primary
reason
is
just
that
large
decimals
are
intimidating.
Really
there
isn't
much
optically
more
than
that.
Eunice
unit
bias
too
strong
by
streak,
I
believe,
is
the
best
way
to
frame
it.
F
A
Let's
chat,
swapper
epoch
3..
I
have
a
post
here,
I'll
post
in
the
chat.
A
A
This
is
obviously
proposed
changes
and
we're
waiting
for
any
feedback
in
the
community.
There's
already
been
one
post
by
venki
and
obviously
looking
for
much
more
to
make
a
final
decision.
A
The
first
change
is
ether
gains
rap
bitcoin
from
10
to
12.5
percent
of
the
emission.
This
is
obviously
because
it
is
a
very
strong
pair
with
good
volume,
and
we
want
to
keep
prioritizing
it.
We
had
a
slight
reduction
and
die
against
either
from
ten
to
nine
percent.
This
is
just
because
dye
is
very
fresh
on
arbitrary,
there's
much
more
usdc
and
the
die
pool
didn't
get
the
kind
of
splash
we
were
anticipating.
A
The
ustc
pool
was
very,
very
much
so
effective
in
tvl
and
volume,
so
a
very
slight
reduction
to
kind
of
help,
prioritize
eat
against
rap
bitcoin
and
then
push
for
a
parity
between
uscc
and
die
in
the
coming
couple
of
weeks.
There
was
also
further
reduction
of
the
stable
pair
uscc
usdt
from
4
to
2.5
percent.
A
A
Obviously
the
original
plan
was
to
completely
concede
this
pool,
as
the
volume
is
quite
little,
leaving
it
as
a
portal
for
the
conversion
of
usdc
to
usdt,
so
there's
a
very
important
discussion
to
be
had
there
surrounding
the
important
or
perceived
value
of
tdl
and
what
that
exactly
is
worth
to
the
community.
A
So
we
propose
a
gradual
reduction
slightly
less
than
anticipated
to
2.5
percent
of
the
allocation,
but
would
be
open
to
obviously
discussing
what
exactly
that
looks
like
for
the
future
of
the
pair.
We
also
had
very
slight
reductions
to
rb
against
mim
and
no
gino
against
eth.
This
is
just
because
they
were
slightly
underperforming
as
to
what
was
anticipated
so
leaving
a
slightly
smaller
allocation
and
hoping
that
the
community
catches
up
with
that
allocation
before
putting
more
swapper
emissions
on
it.
A
Another
thing
worth
noting
is
that
those
of
you
that
were
on
this
call
would
be
aware
that
there
is
an
ib,
btc
and
badger
pool
planned
for
epoch
2..
Obviously,
now
we
are
one
week
through
epoch,
2
and
there's
no
pool
what
is
happening
there
is
they
need
some
extra
time
to
work
on
their
vaults
and
get
ibbtc
bridged
over
to
arbitram.
A
I
think
sky
has
the
most
notable
information
on
this,
but
I
do
believe
there
is
plans
to
launch
those
pools
and
vaults
this
coming
thursday
at
the
start
of
epoch,
3,
which
would
mean
that
we'd
utilize,
epoch,
2
funds,
alongside
epoch
3
for
their
pools,
obviously
keep
an
eye
on
announcements.
A
There'll
be
some
formal
communication
about
that
coming
in
the
coming
week
and
there's
one
more
final
thing:
we'd
like
to
discuss
and
that's
being
the
extension
of
campaigns,
particularly
on
arbitrum
for
mainnet
and
xdy
xdy
will
be
following
a
single
epochs
to
start
as
we
get
our
footing
on
xdi,
but
mainnet
will
follow
four
epochs
in
one
campaign.
A
We
want
users
to
be
able
to
stake
and
unstake
not
bi-weekly
on
a
chain
that
it
will
cost
them
several
hundred
dollars
to
do
so
so
expect
a
four
epoch
campaign
on
mainnet,
but
there
is
discussion
to
be
had
about
arbitram,
obviously
on
epoch
3,
we
are
still
quite
early
in
the
emissions
schedule,
so
maybe
not
quite
the
time
yet.
I
do
believe
vinky
shared
that
he
was
not
interested
quite
yet
in
merging
of
the
epochs
for
arbitram.
A
But
there
is
something
to
say
about
the
potential
of
merging
three
and
four
or
in
the
future.
Four
and
five,
for
example,
to
help
facilitate
the
the
lower
yet
still
palpable
gas
costs
on
arbitram,
so
yeah
there's
discussion.
We
had
there.
Obviously,
as
I
mentioned,
mainnet
and
xdi
farms
had
to
be
moved
back
as
a
part
of
our
proposal
process,
but
we
do
have,
as
far
as
I
know,
a
confirmed
date
now
of
next
epoch,
so
that
would
be
october
14th
thursday.
A
F
Yeah
just
to
be
ex
explicit
or
clear
on
the
mainnet
and
xdi
one,
so
those
proposals
came
from
mainnet
and
they've
already
been
submitted,
and
so
these
will
be
the
first
time
you
can
get
swapper
outside
of
arbor
trump,
and
so
there
are.
There
is
a
pool
to
farm
swapper,
that's
launching
next
thursday.
So
if,
if
anyone's
interested
in
participating
in
that
pool,
whether
that's
on
maynet
or
xdi,
they
will
need
to
withdraw
their
swapper
from
arbitrum
and
it
takes
seven
days
to
withdraw.
A
Excellent
perfect.
Thank
you.
Any
final
comments
obviously
feel
free
to
ask.
We
do
have
the
form
post
up
and
would
appreciate
any
community
feedback.
A
Seeing
a
more
level
discussion
in
the
chat
here,
if
there's
nothing
else
on
that,
we'll
move
on
to
open
questions
here,
a
bit
early,
anticipate
the
call
to
end
slightly
earlier
as
well.
I
do
have
one
question,
maybe
john
and
or
tammy
that
was
left
with
me
with
dev
priorities
shifted.
When
can
we
expect
to
focus
on
omen
and
its
guild
again.
B
I
guess
I'll
take
that
one
yeah
I
get.
I
think
the
overarching
plan
here
is
to
build
momentum
and
and
therefore
like
improve
recruiting
on
the
development
side.
So
it
would
be
kind
of
the
factors
there
would
be
like
how
busy
are
we
with
the
other
priorities
and
then
how
successful
are
we
recruiting
new
developers
so,
like
I'm
hopeful
that
we
can
return
the
focus
to
omen
in
earnest
like
sooner
rather
than
later?
B
I
can't
really
put
a
date
on
that,
but
I
would
hope,
maybe,
by
the
end
of
this
year.
D
Yeah-
and
I
just
want
to
add
that
you
know
there
is
a
lot
of
work
still
going
on
with
omen,
but
it's
not
regarding
the
technical
side
and
that's
obviously
the
main
focus,
but
there
are
definitely
other
improvements
that
are
going
into
not
only
like
research
on
omen
for
the
conditional
token
framework
and
just
how
to
improve
the
overall
user
experience.
There's
a
lot
of
work
going
on
with
branding
as
well
right
now
yeah.
D
So
it's
kind
of
this
exploratory
phase
that
we're
going
through
and
of
course,
yes,
if
like
there
are
developers
who
are
interested
in
working
on
the
conditional
token
framework
and
we're
very
close
to
finishing
the
guild,
but
need
to
re-prioritize
right
now
with
our
other
projects.
Yeah
just
like.
Let
us
know
we're
going
to
continue
to
pursue
this,
like
john
said,
and
hopefully
wrap
stuff
up
or
start
wrapping
stuff
up
at
the
end
of
the
year.
B
And,
in
a
sense,
there
is
still
even
development
work
happening
like
we're.
I
just
am
in
the
process
of
scheduling
and
nodded
for
the
updated
farming
contracts
which
would
be
used
in
the
with
the
omen
token
and
the
swapper
guild
work
that
is
in
process
is
also
like
relevant
to
what's
going
to
be
deployed
with
omen,
2,
so
there's
still
things
that
are
moving
but
yeah.
It's
just
not
the
primary
focus,
with
governance
and
swapper
being
those
for
now
but
yeah,
hopefully
sooner
rather
than
later.
A
F
D
Yeah
I'd
like
to
hear
more
about
that.
Why
I
feel
like
this
came
up
at
some
point
when
we
were
looking
at
other
options
to
dot
link
for
our
enses.
F
Yeah-
and
I
I
kind
of
think
the
like
the
long-term
play
is
for
there
to
be
lots
of
different
services
that
are
like
hosting
ens
domains
in
in
various
different
domains.
Just
so
you
have
like
a
lot
of
redundancy
to
it.
There
will
be
others,
I
don't
know
they
all
need
to
start
with
l.
There.
E
F
D
H
F
He
was
trying
to
raise
the
hand
of
plankton
and
accidentally
raise
his
own
hand.
I
think
there's
also
a
question
from
spicy
soup,
any
tips
for
how
to
get
tokens
whitelisted
for
arb
one.
I
believe
they
are
opening
everything
up
on
october
22nd,
so
there
will
be
no
white
list,
but
I
think
it
is
kind
of
a
little
congested
right
now,
but
maybe
someone
else
has
insight.
B
I
mean,
I
guess
other
other
than
that
other
than
waiting
for
that
to
open
up
you'd
have
to
request
it
right
and
I'm
not
sure
what
kind
of
pace
or
what
kind
of
backlog
they're
dealing
with.
If
it's
like
relevant
to
swapper,
I
think
we'd
be
happy
to
maybe
put
in
a
word
and
try
to
encourage
them
to
to
do
it
sooner
rather
than
later.
F
But
I
definitely
agree
with
what
spicy
soup
is
saying
there.
I
think
it's
like
the
white
list
is
is
very
good
for
the
like
kind
of
as
arbitrary
guarded
launch,
but
in
terms
of
like
the
number
of
tokens
it
could
be
on
swapper.
It's
it
limits
the
possibility
just
because
there
aren't
as
many
tokens
it
could
be
an
arbitrary
one.
B
I
I
The
reason
we
did
this
was
because
you
have
so
many
you
know:
d,
web
and
dap
developers.
Using
these,
you
know
dot,
eth
web3
websites
and
we
all
know
how
bad.links
service
can
be,
and
so
I'm
not
the
developer
by
any
means.
That's
technically
animal
hut
he's
in
your
he's
in
the
key
base,
but
anyways
the
the
long
story
of
everything
is
that
the
goal
of
limo
is
to
be
a
decentralized
set
of
nodes.
So
you
would
have
multiple
validators
around
the
world
that
are
trusted
to
basically
give
everybody.
I
I
You
know-
and
I
don't
know
that
a
lot
of
people
are
even
thinking
about
this,
but
like
there's
a
lot
of
security
risk
when
you
connect
to
these
gateways,
because
you
know
you
could
have
a
man
in
the
middle
attack
and
somebody
could
be
sending
you,
you
know
a
different
hash
for
a
transaction
that
isn't
what
you
want.
You
know
and
you
get
a
lot
of
people
that
are
probably
rushing
to
mint
and
nft,
connecting
their
wallet
to
some
website.
I
There's
just
there's
a
lot
of
security
risks
that
are
involved
in
doing
these
sort
of
things,
and
so
with
limo.
We
do
not
log
anybody's
ip
addresses.
We
don't
do
any
fingerprinting.
I
Right
now,
it
is
centralized
for
sure
I
mean
it's
more,
arguably
more
decentralized
than
cloudflare,
because
cloudflare
is
this
mega
corp,
you
know
conglomerate,
but
I
find
it
kind
of
ironic
that
for
the
d
web
you
know
everybody
flocks
to
cloudflare
and
google
analytics
when
we
should
be
doing
the
exact
opposite
and
moving
away
from
that.
I
So
yeah
limo
is
meant
to
be
a
public
good
for
anybody
to
use.
We
do
not
currently
support
subdomains
yet,
but
we
have
a
roadmap
that
we
are
working
on
and
it's
only
two
people,
it's
literally
me
and
animal
hud
and
we're
both
brothers
in
real
life.
I
Well,
the
reason
limo
was
chosen
was
because
everybody's
so
used
to
using
dot
link,
and
so,
since
everybody
knows
link
you
know
you
just
delete
the
the
last
two
letters
and
replace
it
with
mo
and
it
loads.
So
you
know
if
you
were
going
to
eat
that
link
website.
Does
it
render
just
delete
two
characters
and
put
in
though.
H
H
If
someone
gets
at
that
link
like
they,
don't
they
don't
understand
enss,
they
don't
understand
exactly
why
we
would
use
that
kind
of
domain.
We're
already
getting
a
lot
of
people
asking
like
why
you
guys
using
that
kind
of
domain.
So
they
don't
understand
it
first
of
all,
and
then
I
think
using
that
limo
it
takes
it
even
one
step
further.
It
actually
looks
a
little
bit
suspicious
getting
that
kind
of
link.
So
have
you
guys
thought
anything
about
that.
I
Well,
we've
we've
spoken
at
the
we
spoke
with
brantley
at
ens
and
nick
at
ens,
and
then
actually
I
don't
know
how
much
details
I
can
go
into
it.
E
thought
link
was
not
supposed
to
be
necessarily
the
original
name
for
the
ip
or
e
s,
ipf
resolver.
It
was
actually
going
to
be
eat
that
show,
but
that
gets
into
virgil
in
the
whole
north
korea
situation
it's
kind
of
an
insane
story,
but
long
story
short
to
my
understanding.
Virgil
technically
still
has
like
ethotlink.
I
H
Yeah
good
question:
I
haven't
actually
checked,
what's
available
out
there
to
to
have,
but
I
think
that
limo,
it's
very
like
it,
would
be
fun
for
like
for,
like
some
fun
projects,
probably,
but
I
think
if
you
try
to
look
serious,
that
limo
kinda
ruins
it
a
little
bit.
I
mean
crypt
is
not
that
serious,
even
though
it
is
serious
right,
but
just
trying
to
remove
as
much
friction
as
possible.
I
Well,
I
mean
there's
a
whole
method
behind
the
idea
of
the
limo
as
well.
I
mean
you're
when
you
think
of
you,
okay,
so
if
you
get
into
a
limousine,
you
know
you've
got
the
separated
compartments,
so
you've
got
the
driver
in
the
front
and
then
you've
got
the
window
that
rolls
up
the
driver
can't
hear
anything.
You
know.
Let's
just
pretend
right.
The
driver
can't
hear
anything
that
you're
saying
so
anything
that's
happening
in
the
back
of
the
limousine
is
totally
private
and
the
limo
driver
is
driving
you
to
your
destination.
I
Safely
does
not
know,
what's
happening,
the
conversation
going
on
in
the
back,
so
that's
kind
of
how
we
see
limo.
I
don't
really
see
it
as
being
silly.
You
know
it's
just
sort
of
an
alternative
to
link.
There's
really,
no
other.
You
know
everybody
falls
into
this.
You
know
they're
used
to
just
using
ethe.link,
so
if
you
were
to
mix
it
up
and
just
change
it
to
something
totally
random,
I
don't
know
I
mean
I'm
not
sure
how
you
could
create
another
name
and
not
have
people
than
questioning.
H
I
think
they
will
question.
I
agree
with
that
they're
already
questioning
that
link.
E
Yeah,
I
I
just
want
to
say
I
I
mean
I
think
the
name
is
great,
but
I
don't
know
I
I
I
don't
think
I
should
have
that,
like
big
of
opinion,
not
really
good
with
names,
but
just
like
on
the
project
itself.
I
think
this
is
super
interesting
we've
had
there
were
many
discussions
in
the
dx
style
forum
like
over
the
last
year
about
you,
know
the
centralization
risk
the
usability
risks
and
sort
of
like
the
uptime,
and
it
was
you
know
it's
it's
bad
with
cloudflare.
E
It
was
bad
even
before
and
yeah
it's.
I
think
it's
super
interesting
what
you
guys
are
doing-
and
I
don't
know
like
speaking
as
just
a
member
of
the
dao,
but
I
would
like
to
figure
out
how
you
know
how
cool
we
could
be
a
part
of
this
and
how
we
could
yeah
contribute
to
the
secret
system,
because
we
need
to
have
something
robust
and
decentralize
that
you
know
redirect
if
we
want
to
actually
have
like
a
decentralized
web.
So
that's
kind
of
yeah.
I
Totally
I
mean
it's
just
having
one
entity,
especially
cloud
for
their.
I
mean
you
know
you.
Somebody
can
connect
to
a.eth
website,
you
know
with
metamask
or
the
right
browser,
but
for
the
normie
onboarding
process.
If
you
will,
you
know
you're
going
to
need
this
sort
of
web
2
to
web
3
gateway.
If
you
will
to
really
try
to
onboard
people.
I
But
yeah
I
mean
we,
you
know
this
is
being
paid
for
out
of
pocket.
There's
no,
you
know
they're
technically
right
now,
there's
no
sort
of
dow
or
token
we
have
a
discord.
We
haven't
dropped
it.
Yet
we
will
be
doing
that
kind
of
want
to
add
some
captcha,
bots
and
stuff
in
there,
so
it
doesn't
get
taken
over
as
soon
as
we
post
the
link,
but
yeah
I
mean
we're
excited
to
be
in
the
space.
I
B
Yeah
thanks
thanks
for
joining
on
stage,
and
it's
definitely
a
big
need.
I'm
curious
what
you
think
is
sort
of
like
the
end
game
here
like
where
are
we
going
as
a
space
to
get
yet
to
make
it
more
decentralized?
And
if
you
want
to
kind
of
comment
on
what
your
plans
would
be
with
your
service
to
lmo2?
That
could
be
interesting.
I
So
the
ultimate
goal
would
be
to
decentralize
limo
infrastructure
through,
like
a
community-run
cdn,
you
know
we
obviously
haven't
figured
out
how
that
would
work
exactly
yet,
but
essentially
you
would
have
a
set
of
trusted.
Validators
are
people
running
limo
nodes
that
would
be
staking
either
some
sort
of
governance-
token.
I
You
know
something
into
them
and
then
they
would
be
all
coming
to
a
consensus
and
validating
that.
Yes,
this
is
the
correct
information.
You
know
we're
early
in
the
project.
This
obviously
is
not
an
easy
undertaking,
but
nothing
really
truly
is.
B
Yeah
understandable
and
we
were
actually
discussing
using
that
limo
when
that
link
was
down
around
the
time
that
we
had
launched
swapper
on
arbitrary,
because
it
was
a
pretty
sensitive
moment
for
us
and
a
link
a
bit
down.
B
I
think
over
a
day
and
I
think
the
main
reason
we
didn't
go
too
far
down
the
path
end
up,
you
like
pointing
to
that
limo,
it's
not
really
like
using
it
per
se
right,
it's
more
like
pointing
to
it
in
documentation
and
communications
was
just
because
it
was
a
new
thing,
and
I
don't
think
there
was
much
like
like
you
said
it
is
a
security
concern
right,
like
with
the
possibility
of
having
attacks
like
man-in-the-middle
attacks
or
whatever
right
fishing
or
something
like
can
you,
and
I
think
the
main
reason
that
we
didn't
go
with
that
was.
B
I
All
I
can
tell
you
is
that
we're
tiny?
We
don't
have
the
resources
to
pull
the
kind
of
information
that
cloudflare
would
be
able
to
pool
on
people.
You
know
we
don't
track
your
ips.
We
will
eventually
be
open
source,
so
anybody
would
be
able
to
run
their
own
gateway
if
they
want,
but,
as
part
of
that,
you
know
obviously
brings
big
responsibility
because
you
could
have
malicious
gateway
actors,
and
so
that's
sort
of
the
goal
of
limo
is
to
be
sort
of
a
middleman.
I
For
that
to
be
able
to
prove
the
validity
of
other
gateways
that
pop
up
when
they
do,
because
in
theory
it
is
something
that
could
be
abused,
but
I
mean
outside
of
us
telling
you
that
it's
safe
to
use.
No,
I
mean
right
right
now.
There's
I
mean
there's
nothing
that
we
could
show
you
and
it's
kind
of
funny.
I
I'm
actually
glad
that
you
guys
have
brought
this
up,
because
we've
referred
to
this
as
the
limo
dilemma,
because
a
lot
of
people
were
just
using
limo
and
one
night
animal,
and
I
were
just
sitting
there
shooting
the
back
and
forth,
and
you
know
we
found
it
interesting
that
you
know
people
were
just
trusting
it
and
using
it
you
know,
and
while
we're
not
malicious,
there
could
be
other
malicious
actors.
That
would
do
something
like
this
and
it
goes
back
to
people
just
don't
understand
how
this
works
like.
I
I
don't
think
they
understand
the
complexity
you
know
and
what
it
takes.
B
But
it
is
like
you
know
as
much
as
I
am
inherently
distrustful
of
centralized
services
and,
like
you
know,
that's
why
we're
working
in
crypto
at
the
same
time,
if
you're
just
making
the
decision
between
like
who
do,
I
think,
is
more
likely
to
attack
like
a
service
or
like
try
to
make
a
theft
right
like.
I
think
I
would
trust
a
big
company
like
cloudflare
over
an
individual
right
or
or
especially
some
non-individuals
or
people
I
didn't
know,
but
like
yeah,
the
long-term
goal,
I
think
like
definitely
makes
sense
but
yeah.
I
No
totally
I
mean,
if
you're
confirming
you
know,
the
other
thing
too
is
like
you
know.
If
you're
connecting,
I
don't
know,
let's
just
say,
you're
using
limo,
you
connect
to
a
website.
You
know
on
swapper,
or
whatever
I
mean
if
you're
verifying
the
metamask
transaction
and
it
is
going
to
the
correct
place,
then
you
know
there's
no
problem
like
the
only
way
that
somebody
in
theory
could
try
to
inject
the
wrong
information
is
like.
I
If
we
were,
you
know,
if
somebody
was
rerouting
you
to
some
sort
of
coin
or
nft
or
something
I
mean
you'd,
be
able
to
verify
the
transaction
yourself
that
you
know
what
you're
doing
is
what
you're
doing
it
really
would
be
somebody
that's
just
not
paying
attention
that
would
fall
to
that.
B
Country
so
there
are
ways
to
verify
and
you
can
kind
of
rely
on
the
fact
of
a
community
of
like
technically
capable
people
is
using
it.
That's
correct.
I
And
we
I
mean
that's
part
of
the
you
know
if
you
see
our
little
man
in
the
middle
attack,
you
know
this
is
something
that
we
plan
on
trying
to
address
in
the
future.
As
more
and
more
gateways
will
open.
I
And
part
of
this
also
is
like
testing
so
like.
If
you
run
a
d
website,
there's
really
no
analytics
that
you
can
use
really
outside
of
cloudflare.
I
mean
google
and
there's
no
a
b
testing,
there's
just
a
lot
of
things
that
are
lacking
when
it
comes
to
the
deweb
so
yeah.
We
have
a
whole
list
of
things
that
we
would
like
to
implement
it's
going
to
take
time,
since
it's
only
two
people
but
yeah,
you
know
we're
excited
to
be
in
the
space.
We
understand
why
people
would
be
paranoid.
I
It's
crypto!
It's
good!
You
should
be
paranoid.
You
shouldn't
really
trust
anybody.
We
probably
won't
stay
anonymous
forever,
we're
working
on
this
dow
concept,
it's
just
sort
of
a
a
slow
process,
trying
to
figure
it
all
out.
You
know.
B
I
I
A
Cool
guys
well,
thank
you
very
much
for
participating
in
the
now
weekly
dxdot
community
call
we'll
end
it
here
just
over
the
top
of
the
hour
and,
of
course,
thank
you
again
to
plankton
for
for
coming
in
here.
At
the
end,
much
appreciated
we'd
like
to
have
more
people
from
relevant
communities
and
projects
coming
on
and
speaking
on,
these
calls.