►
From YouTube: DXdao Community Call [2021-07-29]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Yeah,
we
have
a
lot
of
cool
topics
to
discuss
today.
This
is
going
to
be
a
pretty
open
discussion.
The
agenda
roughly
is
dx
vote
and
governance.
2.0
update,
I
think
from
mainly
from
augusto,
and
then
we
can.
A
We
can
chat
about
that
and
then
a
recap
and
some
learnings
from
evcc
and
attendance
in
paris
last
week,
which
I
think
was
quite
valuable
for
for
the
ecosystem
and
everyone
in
the
space
was
excited
to
meet
up
in
real
life
again,
and
I
think
a
lot
of
dxdow
community
contributors
and
other
contributors
and
other
community
members
were
in
attendance
and
so
got
to
meet
for
the
first
time
in
person
and
and
really
see
what
a
eth
event's
like
and
then
another
topic
that
we'd
like
to
to
openly
discuss
is
kind
of
the
censoring
of
tokens
in
in
front
ends
for
dapps,
and
this
is
relevant
because
of
the
recent
news
of
unit,
swap
you
know,
banning
a
few
tokens
from
their
front
end
and
and
making
them
actually
impossible
to
trade
through
their
front
end
and
so
raises
a
bigger
question
if
are
are
like
front
ends
owned
by
dows
better.
A
Are
they
more
resistant
to
to
like
outside
voice
and
and
etc?
So.
A
Agenda,
if
I
guess
we
can
kick
things
off
with
an
update
on
dx
vote,
which
is,
you
know,
been
making
a
lot
of
progress
augusto.
If
you
want
to
give
a
few
words
of
the
state
and
plans
and
and
yeah
it's
going
and
then
also
there
were
some
interesting
discussions
around
governance
2.0
this
week
and
kind
of
what
were
what
the
exile
community
is.
Thinking
related
to
that
as
well.
B
B
B
An
issue
on
on
github,
so
pretty
much,
that's
it
I
I
did
some
changes
on,
for
example,
adding
countdowns
and
I'm
trying
to
countdown.
For
example,
if
you
enter
now
when
you're
going
to
see
a
proposal,
you
should
see
when
it's
going
to
be
executed
boosted.
There
are
some
pending
executions
missing
the
order
of
the
proposals,
so
everything
kind
of
works
also
a
very
important
thing
that
I
bridge
a
bunch
of
tokens
on
amitron.
B
They
were
added
to
the
avatar
address
in
arabic
from
testnet.
We
allow
the
tokens
to
be
traded
through
this
permission
registry
that
we
have
in
the
export.
This
is
kind
of
permission
layer
over
the
scheme
that
allow
you
to
tell
to
which
scheme
and
the
avatar
address
what
it,
what
it
is
allowed
to
do
or
not.
This
adds
a
very
good
security
layer
on
the
on
the
on
the
export
infrastructure,
something
that
we
are
lacking,
that
we
are
missing
in
alchemy
right
now.
So
these
are.
B
B
Of
things
happening
there
yeah
there
is
a
submit
issue
link
in
the
in
the
footer,
so
it
will
be
awesome
if
we
can
try
to
start
trying
to
do
everything
through
dx
volt
on
every
network
we
should
be
able
to.
You
should
be
able
now,
for
example,
if
you
want
to
vote
a
proposal
with
less
with
less
reputation
than
the
one
you
have,
you
should
be
able
to
do
it
too.
A
Yeah
one
one
yeah,
one
observation:
actually
I
was
in
in
paris,
I
was
talking
about
dx
vote
in
general
as
a
as
a
more
resistant
front,
end
for
dxdo's
governance
and
when
I
would
mention
that,
like
one
of
the
things
it
really,
it
removes
the
dependence
on
the
graph
right
and-
and
actually
that
was
quite
a
interesting
topic
for
many
people.
And
obviously
it
depends
on
the
dap
that
you
are
are
building
in
and
the
user
experience.
A
But
there
were
other
people
that
also
have
done
their
best
to
remove
dependency
on
the
graph
and
and
okay.
It's
not
like
a
hit
on
the
graph,
but
if
dapps
don't
need
to
use
the
graph-
and
you
want
to
be
a
resistant
like
honey,
badger
dap
that,
like
always,
can
be
used
and
won't
disrupt
your
governance-
that
that
is
a
becoming
a
popular
tactic.
A
A
B
Yeah
first,
regarding
the
graph,
the
graph
independent,
the.
That
is
something
that
I
I
think
is
super
cool.
I
expected
it
to
work.
I
I
thought
it
was
going
to
work,
and
now
it
actually
works
right.
We
we,
we
have
the
export
working
on
four
networks
yeah.
The
way
it
works
is
that
we
have
we
index
all
the
information
of
ourselves
through
through
a
script,
and
all
this
information
is
bundled
next
to
into
the
build
of
the
app.
So
this
works
for
us
because
it
it
is
not
how.
B
How
can
we
say
it?
We
don't
depend
too
much
on
real-time
data
right,
for
example,
then
d5
exchanges-
they
do
you
know
also
they
need
the
graph
that
is,
that
is
very
hard
and
yeah
the
real
time.
The
real-time
data
that
the
blockchain
provides.
B
You
is
not
good
enough
when
you
are
trading
financial
assets
and
we
are
on
when
you
are
when
you
are
trying
and
and
using
a
lot
of
funds
on
your
portable,
like,
for
example,
swapper
unit
swap
one
inch
or
the
stuff,
so
those
that
that
was
the
thing
that
allowed
that
allow
us
to
do
it
and
that
we
started
working
it
because
actually
it
isn't.
B
B
I
was
reading
again
the
the
governor
super
new
implementation
that
it
wasn't
me
last
year
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
the
changes
that
we
need
to
do
on
the
governance
layer.
What
we
designed
in
government
was
it
is
just
change.
How
do
we
get
the
reputation
when
we
are
going
to
do
the
voting?
B
B
That
is
a
single
contract
that
we
need
to
update
that
we
need
to
change
in
order
to
implement
governance,
2.0
and
again
the
less
changes
that
we
do
the
better,
because
I
think
it
is
proven
that,
regarding
I
mean
putting
aside
all
the
risk
that
we
have
with
all
the
current
with
our
current
technical
infrastructure,
it
has
to
be
solid
enough
for
our
governors
and
for
all
the
funds
that
we
are
that
we
are
having
right.
So,
let's
change
that
we
can
apply
that
we
can
do
to
implement
governor
2.0.
B
There
were,
of
course,
it
would
be
awesome
to
take
this
a
chance
to
do
a.
It
would
be
awesome
too,
like
a
security
upgrade
if
we
want
to
call
it
on
there
on
some
of
our
contracts.
Most
importantly,
the
controller
contract,
the
contrary
contract
that
it
controls
the
communication
between
the
schemes
and
the
avatar,
and
also
between
the
schemes
and
the
reputation.
So
that
is
the
only
single
contract
that
we
need
to
change.
The
call
that
we
need
to
upgrade
and
we
need
to
update
in
order
to
implement
governance,
2.0
and
yeah.
B
That's
mainly
it
then
it
would
be
how
it
is
how
we
describe,
and
how
do
we
show?
How
do
we,
how
do
we
display
the
the
repetition
that
everywhere
that
everybody
has,
I
think
everything
anything
that
is
any
proposal
or
an
implementation
or
any
or
anything
we
do
outside?
Does
that
scope
of
work?
A
B
Not
really
because
that
is
a
problem
that
it
was
introduced
by
berlin
harford
and
we
are
still
using
the
same
avatar
address
the
only
way
to
fix
that
is
by
changing
the
address
by
deploying
a
new
avatar
smart
contract.
That
will
mean
changing
the
address
anyway.
It
will
make
it
way
easier
for
us
to
go
cut
finder
work
around
the
the
relayers,
and
it
also
allows
the
the
schemes
to
send
funds
itself.
For
example,
we
have
the
master.
D
B
Scheme
and
the
quick
quality
scheme,
the
quick
wallet
scheme,
if
you
enter
on
arbitrome
or
wrinkle
you're,
going
to
see
that
it's
going
to
make
calls
from
the
schematic
itself
doesn't
mean
that
the
scheme
can
control
its
own
funds.
The
master
wallet
is
going
to
make
all
from
the
avatar.
B
The
avatar
needs
the
relayer
because
it
has
the
code.
It
has
smart
contract
that
was
deployed
before
the
berlin
hardwork.
B
We
only
also
it's
important
it's
important
to
say
that
we
only
need
the
relayers
because
we
are
sending.
We
are
sending
fast
to
a
genesis
wallet.
If
we
are
talking
about
that
relayer.
We
only
need
that
because
everything
we
some
functional
genocide.
It
takes
a
bit
more
gas
and
it's
not
enough
to
the
gas
that
we
are
spending
by
default
when
we
are
sending
ether
from
the.
B
A
Questions
we
can
move
to
the
next
topic.
I
was
hoping
that
we
have
some
reflections
and
we
did
some
learnings
and
recaps
in
the
forum
and
on
an
earlier
call
this
week
about
ecc
and
attending.
You
know
ethereum
in
paris
ethereum
week
in
paris,
and
I
thought
it
might
be
good
if,
if
anyone
here
wants
to
give
give
a,
you
know
a
verbal
recap
of
of
what
they
learned
or
or
some
of
their
feelings
just
for
the
wider
community.
That's
attending
this
call.
A
The
first
question
was
like:
oh,
what
dows
are
you
in
and
like
that's
that's
a
question
that
six
months
ago
or
even
yeah
people
didn't
ask
that
question,
and
so
I
think,
with
the
focus
on
taos
and
people
trying
to
figure
out
governance
and
and
come
big
companies
dissolving
entities
and
becoming
daos
and
then
all
the
different
flavors
of
taos
from
from
less
decentralized
to
more
decentralized
taos.
But
dows
are
obviously
a
hot
topic
and
something
that
dx
dow
has
been
near
the
front
of
from
the
beginning.
A
And
then
a
big
topic
of
like
doubt-a-dow
relations
is
is
really
important.
I
think,
because,
as
more
dows
enter
this
space
really
there's
this
whole
dynamic
of
dows
aligning
interest
with
each
other,
interacting
with
each
other,
hiring
each
other.
So
there's
things
like
pr
daos
now,
which
other
dows
can
hire.
A
But
I'd
be
interested
to
hear
what
other
people
think
about
that
that
dynamic
and
if
it's
possible
and
and
and
how
and
then
the
the
details
might
be
like.
How
do
you
make
sure
that
you
align
interest
when
you
do
a
lot
of
these
doubt
of
doubt
interactions
is.
It
is
a
token
swap
the
most
effective
way,
or
is
it
an
investment
or
some
other
some
other
thing.
E
Yeah,
just
as
a
echoing
conversation,
we
were
having
about
engaging
with
the
contractor
and,
like
some
of
the
you
know,
real
life
problems
of
a
dow
like
how
do
you
build
products?
How
do
you
kind
of
make
payments
and
to
contractors,
and
all
these
different
things
that
are
like
the
headaches
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
was
thinking
about
is
even
in
like
dow
to
dao
interactions
like
who
is
the
arbitrator?
E
Maybe
that
could
be
like
escrowing
funds
in
a
smart
contract
and
then
releasing
them
on
certain
conditions,
if
that,
like
cooperation,
is
more
of
a
payment
for
service
one.
So
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
like
service
provider
opportunities
for
those
like
dow
to
dao
interactions
and
even
some
of
those
service
provider
opportunities
that
will
like
connect
things
to
the
off
chain
world,
but
kind
of
be
both
that,
like
the
the
on-chain
rapper
for
that
agreement
or
interaction
between
the
the
two
daos.
F
I
also
think
there's
opportunities
to
do
things
in
more
trustless
ways
between
dows.
I
think,
like
an
example
that
you
could
imagine
that
I
think
we've
maybe
even
discussed
a
little
bit
would
be
dx
style
working
with
another
dow
to
provide
a
farming
campaign
to
like
fund
a
farming
campaign
on
swapper,
or
it
could
be
other
platforms
as
well
right
to
kind
of
commit
funds
together
to
some
effort,
and
do
that
with
you
know,
a
third
party
contractor
you
know
like
an
independent,
smart
contract
to
handle
that
and
do
it
in
a
trustless
way.
F
I
I
wasn't
able
to
attend
ecc
much
much
fomo
on
my
end,
but
I
was
you
know,
I
think
some
of
the
reflections
that
were
interesting
to
hear
about,
like
you
know
how
was
dx
tau's
presence
at
the
conference
and
like
what
were
some
of
the
ideas
on
on
how
we
should
approach
future
conferences
would
be
curious
to
hear.
Like
you
know,
I
think
some
people
already
expressed
these
in
different
forms,
but
like
sky
and
melanie,
I
think
you
and
others
had
some
interesting
ideas
around
that.
D
G
Our
chats,
I
likened
dxdel
to
one
of
those
ships
up
in
the
north
pole,
breaking
the
ice
and
paving
the
path
for
others
to
follow.
We're
not
as
appealing
as
some
cruise
line
where
it's
all
fun,
but
we're
doing
the
the
hard
work.
And
even
if
we
don't
get
the
credits
short
term,
I'm
sure
will
be
appreciated
in
the
years
to
come.
G
A
Drop
yeah,
that's
a
good
point
nathan,
so
we
ideally
can
should
get
better
at
telling
those
stories
right
because
we
are,
if
we
are
breaking
that
ice
like
how
do
we?
How
do
we
tell
those
stories
and
get
those
stories
out
there
and
one
idea
so
so
there's
a
dow
that
is
focused.
G
I
mean
I'll
give
an
analogy
from
my
experience
from
the
real
world
from
the
meat
space.
You
know
to
paint
a
really
good
picture
of
what
it
is.
I
tried
to
do
a
wikipedia
page
for
gxtel
and
it
was
very,
very
simple:
no
shilling,
no
advertising
nothing.
I
was
just
saying
it's
a
decentralized
autonomous
organization,
developing
protocols,
doing
on-chain
governance
using
consensus,
blah
blah.
G
It
was
just
a
few
lines.
It
got
rejected
the
reason
for
rejection
advertisement
like
what
the
hell.
If
you
go
to
the
wikipedia
page
of
tesla,
they
have
their
stock
listed
in
there,
prompting
you
to
go
and
buy
stock.
They
have
all
of
their
models,
they
have
everything,
go
to
the
microsoft
page.
They
have
their
stock
listed.
There
go
buy
some
stock
and
that's
not
advertisement
like
what
is
wikipedia
doing
that's
censorship.
That's
I
don't
know
I
just
I'm
lost
for
words.
H
Can
you
guys
hear
me.
H
Yeah,
I
also
agree
like
it's
very
hard
to
communicate
to
people
like
what
we're
doing,
and
I
think
that's
part
of
the
problem,
because
if
people
really
understood
what
we're
about,
I
think
we
would
like
be
flooded
with
people
coming
in,
but
it's
very
hard
to
grasp
like
what
we're
about,
and
we
definitely
need
to
like
work
on
it
like
to
maybe
like
how
how
to
phrase
it.
How
to
put
you
know
how
to
communicate
it
better.
H
F
Yeah,
I
think
some
comments
were
also
about
like
getting
folks
on
the
same
page
kind
of
around
certain
talking
points
that
that
might
be
current
or
topical
ahead
of
a
conference.
I
thought
that
was
an
interesting
idea
as
well.
Yeah,
definitely
like
what
are
the
two
sentences
that
describe
dxtau
or
like
what's
the
elevator
pitch.
A
Oh,
so
maybe
we
should
move
next
to
maybe
will
be
more
exciting
conversation,
because
a
lot
of
people
have
strong
opinions
about
this,
but
topic
is
related
to
you
know
censorship
and
censoring
tokens
in
front
ends,
and
so
this
is
relevant
because
uniswap
recently
announced
that
that,
in
their
front
end
they
were
basically
censoring
or
making
it
impossible
to
trade.
Certain
tokens
through
their
front
end
into
the
protocol,
and
this
is
different
than
like
a
token
list.
A
Curation,
which,
like
shows
tokens
in
you,
know,
drop
downs
and
things,
and
you
know
generally
most
dexes.
You
have.
The
ability
to
you
know
paste
in
an
address,
see
access
that
access,
a
pool
with
that
token's
liquidity
and
trade
it
in
a
rather
permissionless
way.
A
In
this
scenario,
they
have
implemented
basically
a
disallow
list
so
that
it
is
impossible
to
trade
certain
tokens
through
their
front
end,
and
so
the
question
the
bigger
general
question
is
like
is
this:
okay
is,
is
unit
swap
very
vulnerable
to
pressures
from
like
voices
in
the
space
and
then
is
our
front
ends
that
are
owned
by
decentralized
collectives,
more
power
like
stronger,
more
more
resistant,
unstoppable,
and
is
that
a
good
thing
or
a
bad
thing?
A
So
that's
kind
of
the
the
topic
and
would
be
great
to
hear
people's
interesting
takes
on
on
this
topic,
and
there
were
some.
There
was
a.
There
was
a
tweet
thread
on
on
one
of
the
exiles.
Twitters,
which
is
was
kind
of
you
know,
made
some
claims
and,
and
and
things
related
to
this,
but
it
was
it's
a
little.
It's
very
nuanced
and
there's
lots
of
specific
little
details,
so
it's
hard
to
like
convey
it
in
like
three
tweets
or
something
but
yeah.
This
is
an
interesting
topic
so
that
we
can
discuss
now.
I
Yeah
that
that
tweet
thread
was
from
swapper's
twitter
actually
and
then
one
of
the
tweets
was
retweeted
by
by
dxtap,
but
same
idea,
basically,
and
there's
also
some
interesting
discussion
going
around
like
what
would
happen
if
individual
members
of
our
dow
got
a
letter
from
the
sec
saying
you
know
you
gotta
do
some
some
sort
of
a
censorship
or
something,
and
then
what
we
would
do
about
that
too.
F
And
I
think,
like
one
thing
to
be
clear
on
is
dxtap:
does
control
its
front
ends
right,
so
it
has
the
the
ability
to
do
kind
of
same
things
that
uniform
is
doing
in
their
front
ends
right.
So
it's
not
like
there's
anything
structurally
like
making
it
impossible
for
dxtap
to
you,
know
whitelist
or
blacklist,
or
do
anything
on
the
front
ends,
but
I
think
that
the
difference
here
right
is
like.
Why
is
uniswap
like
censoring
these,
these
tokens
right?
F
It's
not
because
you're
gonna
swap
the
company
or
whatever
it
feels
that
these
tokens,
like
shouldn't,
be
on
unit
swap
right
like
there's.
No,
I
don't
see
any
justification
from
the
uniswap
community
as
like
why
this
should
be
done
right,
so
it's
like
they
are
bending
to
outside
pressure
right
to
do
this
like
perceived
risks
and
stuff.
F
When
you
really
like
look
at
it
is
like
that
decision
for
dx
style,
like
would
not
be
made
by
like
a
few,
you
know
vcs
in
a
boardroom
right
like
it,
would
have
to
be
done
via
on
chain
consensus
by
the
400
plus
like
rep
holders
right,
and
I
think
a
lot
of
the
philosophy
and
spirit
of
dx
doubt
is
to
like
kind
of
be
unstoppable.
F
Like
and
again
that
doesn't
mean
like
like
criminal.
No,
like
we
want
to
do
the
right
thing.
I
think
I
think
all
the
rep
holders
I
know,
want
to
do
like
something
good
and
positively
impact
the
world
right,
but
to
do
it
and
enable
financial
freedom
right
to
not
bend
to
some
influence
of
a
particular
government
or
some
centralized
entity
because
of
their
particular.
I
F
I
Think
that
if
we
ever
did,
then
it
would
really
compromise
the
whole
the
whole
spirit
of
the
dao
when
we'd
really
lose
basically
the
whole
point
of
being
decentralized,
because
you
know
then
we're
no
better
than
like
a
crypto
exchange,
and
that
seems
like
the
direction.
So
this
is
it's
almost
the
direction
that
unisap
is
going
in.
Is
they
get
closer
and
closer
to
a
centralized
exchange,
as
time
goes
on
and
more
and
more
regulation
happens?
F
Right-
and
I
think
it
is
an
important
and
like
kind
of
one
of
the
unfortunate
things
about
this
uniswap
news
is
like
at
least
how
I
saw
it
being
reported
in
kind
of
the
mainstream
media.
You
know
like
yahoo
finance
type
articles
right
was
that
you
know
uniswap
is
like
censoring
the
like
removing
these
things
right,
and
they
don't
distinguish
like
what
that
really
means
right.
F
Then
there's
a
distinction
between
united
swap's
front
end
and
like
what
the
company
is
doing
versus,
like
you
know,
swap
the
the
protocol
that's
deployed
to
the
blockchain
right
and-
and
this
is
something
that
I
think
anybody
like
us-
that
have
paid
attention
to
the
space
like.
This
is
no
surprise
right.
It's
like
no
surprise
that
that
uni
swap
the
company,
that's
like
based
in
new
york,
is
like
paying
attention
to
regulators
right.
Of
course,
they
are
right.
F
We
always
knew
this
like
there's
no
surprise
here
right
like,
but
the
important
thing
is
the
protocol
is
is
immutable
yeah,
and
I
think
that
the
interesting
part
is
well
like
just
because
uniswap
is,
you
know
controlling
their
front
end
in
a
way
that
is
like
a
bit
fearful
of
regulation
like
that
doesn't
mean
that
there
can't
be
front
ends
that
are
done
in
a
more
decentralized
way
right,
and
I
think
that's
what's
cool
about
dx
towers
right,
like
is
from
the
beginning.
F
Dx
tao
has
taken
a
very
decentralization
focused
approach
to
the
full
stack
right
to
the
front,
and
I'm
not
saying
we're,
like
perfectly
decentralized.
Of
course,
not
that's
like
something
we're
like
a
direction
we're
trying
to
move
in,
but
like
from
the
beginning.
Structurally,
things
have
been
set
up
in
a
way
to
pursue
decentralization
of
the
full
stack
and
like
fundamentally,
a
lot
of
these
vc
backed
incorporated.
F
A
J
I
think
we'll
start
to
see
later
on
when
some
of
these
projects
actually
get
hit
by
scc
or
the
workers
don't
dare
to
work
at
some
of
these
companies
or
whatever
could
happen
in
the
future.
We
will
see
protocols
and
front-ends
being
two
different
parties
doing
it.
So
one
com
company
is
making
the
protocol
and
it
could
be
community
that
makes
the
front
end
or
it
could
be
another
company
making
the
front
end.
Basically,
this
is
what
I
think
will
happen,
and
I
don't
know
when
we
will
see
this,
but
something
drastic
needs
to
happen.
F
J
I
think
there
will
be
most
probably
be
like
companies
doing
profit
or
revenue
by
just
doing
front-ends
they
they
they
don't
do
any
protocols
on.
So,
let's
say
when
tornado
wanted
to
deploy,
instead
of
them
doing
it,
they
did
like
a
semi
semi
like
they.
Let
the
community
basically
deploy
the
smart
contracts,
but
they
still
do
the
front
end
themselves.
So,
right
now
to
to
coordinate
someone
else
to
make
a
front-end.
It's
too
much.
J
Yeah,
but
they
could
be
100
anonymous
right.
They
could
like
run
another
type
of
anonymity,
because
the
front
end
there's
not
as
much
as
like
the
vulnerability
is
not
as
big
as
on
on
the
protocol
side.
So
anonymous
front-end
team
is
better
than
anonymous.
Back-End
team.
E
Yeah,
I
I
think,
like
broadly
speaking,
the
front-end
and
stable
coins
are
the
two
biggest
leverage
points
for
regulators
and
I
actually
think
the
front
end.
You
could
see
more
problems
there
in
the
future
and
if
you
like,
even
at
the
browser
level,
I
wouldn't
be
surprised
to
see
like
censorship
on
like
chrome
or
something
going
to
certain
websites,
and
things
like
that,
and
you
could
even
see
the
browser
turning
into
like
an
app
store
like
level
of
approval.
E
I
I
would
hope
that
it
wouldn't
be
successful,
censoring
it
from
a
browser.
Well,
because
you
know
they,
the
government
has
been
trying
to
ban
torrent
sites,
so
you
can
download
movies
illegally
and
stuff,
for
you
know
probably
decades
at
this
point,
but
they
you
can
still
access
them,
so
I
don't
know
like
if
they,
if
they
can't
block
that
from
the
browser,
I
don't
know
why
they
would
block
d5
well.
E
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
yeah
like
1.3
billion
people
don't
have
in
china,
don't
have
free
access
to
internet.
So
there's
like
a
lot
of
internet
censorship.
I
think
going
on
oh
and.
E
J
I
mean
there's
some
censorship
that
we
don't
talk
about.
You
don't
use
google
to
find
pirate
anymore
like
back,
then
you
can
actually
search
for
torrents
in
google.
Google
made
an
effort
to
remove
a
lot
of
that
and
it
works.
So
that's
that's
one
kind
of
censorship
where
they
don't
index
pirated
sites
anymore
or
or
they
do,
but
they
don't
show
it
in
the
top
of
the
they
give
them
like
low
ranking
score,
even
though
they're
super
relevant.
J
J
I
Happen,
I
just
tested
it
out
right
now
and
I
searched
it
and
basically
it's
all
it's
all
centralized
exchanges
like
kraken
gemini
and
then
articles
about
what
the
best
basically
centralized
exchanges
are
so.
J
Yeah
there's
a
reason
for
that,
like
decentralized
services,
don't
do
seo
like
I
I
worked
with
seo
for
three
years
and
most
like
most
dapps
out.
There
is
very,
very
badly
like
done
in
the
like
seo
world
and
and
they
don't,
they
don't
go
out
and
buy
links
and
try
to
like
build
up
their.
How
do
you
say
it
like
the
ranking
power
so
centralized
services?
J
Actually
they
are
competing
to
each
others
right,
while
we,
when
we
compete
to
other
decentralized
services,
we're
not
competing
on
google,
we're
competing
on
on
the
user
experience
level
or
on
the
on
the
token
level.
So
I
think
it's
a
different
world,
but
I
think,
like
talking
in
the
future,
getting
new
uses
to
crypto,
it's
gonna,
be
google.
It's
gonna
be
word
of
mouth,
it's
gonna
be
a
lot
of
the
traditional
places.
I
Yeah
that
gives
me
an
idea,
because
so
I've
done
some
seo
when
I
was
at
dell,
but
it
was
all
using
wordpress,
but
I'd
be
interested
to
see
how
I
can
improve
seo
with
the
stuff
that's
hosted
on
ipfs.
You
know
it
might.
That
might
actually
be
a
detriment
to
seo
being
hosted
on
ipfs,
but
we'll
see
see
what
we
can
do
there.
J
So
this
is
actually
a
question
that
came
before
crypto.
There
are
experiments
on
on
not
having
a
domain
just
having
an
ip
versus
having
a
domain.
Having
a
com
domain
is
the
most
powerful
thing
you
can
have
right
now
when
it
comes
to
ranking
power,
google
says
this
is
not
true
but
test
people
testing.
This
shows
it's
true.
Having
local
domains
is
also
like
another
thing
like
if
I'm
in
sweden
and
search
searching
for
pi
ethereum,
I'm
gonna
get
local
stuff.
So
it's
gonna
matter,
but
not
that
much.
I
That's
interesting,
so
are
you,
are
you
saying
that,
like
alternative
domain
endings,
like
dot
link
or
e.
J
I'll
give
you
one
quick
thing
that
that
will
give
you
the
best
idea
for
what's
going
to
happen
or
how
how
seo
on
everything
works,
doesn't
matter
what
you,
what
you
do,
the
amount
of
links
you
get
to
your
domain,
it's
gonna,
sorry,
the
amount
of
quality
links
you
get
to
your
domain.
It's
gonna
rank
you
up,
so
we
basically
need
to
be
super
careful
when
we
talk
about
our
product
to
give
them
the
right
domain.
So
let's
say
we
gave
arbitrom
swapper
swapper.
J
something
else
than
swapper.eth
and
they
linked
it
and
and
that
domain
started
ranking
almost
above
the
the
official
domain.
So
we
we
at
the
style
we
need
to
like
make
blocks
actually
linked
to
our
products.
Even
though
they're
the
it's,
the
ethe.link
link
domain,
the
more
links
the
better
and-
and
this
is
how
like
90
of
seo
works.
The
rest
is
just
details.
I
Definitely
that
that
ties
in
with
the
whole
media
dab
thing,
because,
if
the
that's
another
benefit
basically
of
having
a
mainstream
news
articles
about
us
is
if
they
link
to
us
it'll
improve
our
seo.
Yeah.
J
I
J
Could
be
smart,
we
could
build
all
men,
so
you
can
embed
like
markets
right
and
it
links
directly
to
home
and
something
like
that.
We
could
be
smart
by
doing
a
product
that
is
linkable
and
embeddable.
So
that's
a
really
like
great
way
to
do.
Links.
I
Oh
definitely
well,
I
don't
want
to
go
on
this
topic
too
long,
but
I
I
will
talk
with
omen
squad
about
how
I
can
make
a
make
it
so
that
the
when
you
post,
okay,
so
like
part
of
seo,
is
the
text
that
shows
up
with
a
link
and
right
now,
there's
no
text
for
any
any
link
to
any
omen
market.
But
so
that's
already
been
talked
about
is
making
that
text.
A
A
Cool
well
interesting
discussion.
Lots
of
points
to
take
away
from
this.
A
Would
be
yeah
there's
you
can
get
involved
in
this
conversation
on
twitter,
too,
probably
probably
still
going
around.