►
From YouTube: DXbiz Weekly Meeting [2021-03-29]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Yes,
very
nice,
hello
and
welcome
to
the
monday
29th
of
march
2021,
the
excel
business
call
on
the
agenda.
Today
we
have
we're
gonna
start
with
new
member
introductions.
I
don't
see
anyone
right
now.
We're
gonna
have
a
quick
discussion
about
the
exventures
just
being
some
feedback
from
christopher
from
1kx
and
some
discussion
on
deep,
dow
and
opolis,
like
potential
investments,
there's
been
a
discussion
on
the
chat
about
a
curve
deployment
on
xdi
martin.
B
Maybe
you
want
to
chat
briefly
about
this
and
another
discussion
that
happened
in
the
treasury
chat
about
dxdegen
or
you
know,
taking
a
bit
of
the
the
style
treasury
and
actually
using
it
to
farm
and
yeah.
Oh
yeah,
also
swapper
xd
stuff.
Sorry!
So
do
we
have
anyone
new?
No,
I
don't
think
so.
B
So
we
can
just
get
started
with
the
the
expenses
discussion.
So,
with
the
background,
I
think
chris
gave
us
a
bit
of
feedback
and
given
the
fact
that
we
have
about
one
million
dollars
to
deploy
from
the
expanders
at
least
right
now
talking
about
like
the
check
sizes-
and
you
know
wanting
to
distribute
our
our
exposure
to
the
different
products
projects
and
looking
to
have
our
check
sizes
between
50
to
100k
something
around
these
lines
and
finding
several
yeah
several
basically
different
startups
to
invest.
B
And
then,
if
we
recognize
one
might
be
a
winner,
then
double
down.
So
that's
one
thing
I
don't
know
christopher.
Maybe
we
want
to
elaborate
and
then,
after
that
we
can
discuss
on
deep,
dow
and
opolis
potential
investments.
C
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
guess
it's
relatively
obvious
right
that
we,
you
know
like
if
we
have
like
a
one
million
dollar
fund.
You
know
that
we
shouldn't
like
spend
20
20
percent
of
our
all
of
our
capital,
like
on
the
first
deal
or
like
one
of
the
first
deals
that
we
come
across.
C
C
C
You
know
when
we
kind
of
like
see
okay,
they
have
really
gotten
a
lot
of
traction
and
it's
kind
of
like
clear.
They
will
be
the
winner
within
their
within
their
vertical
and
to
then
double
down,
but
on
average
I
would
recommend
to
go
with
like
50k
tickets
and
yeah.
Like
I
mean
in
terms
of
opportunity
right,
I've
seen
this
like
in
other
dollars,
it's
becoming
like
very
enticing
to
you
know,
because
I
mean
you
can
like
I
mean
in
general.
We
are
all
optimists
in
this
space
right.
C
You
know
when
you
are
a
pessimist,
you
know,
you
probably
don't
spend
your
time
liking,
crypto
right,
and
so
we
are
already
like
super
biased,
like
everyone
in
this
space,
and
so
this
also
like
applies
to
kind
of
like
investment
vows
I
have
seen,
and
so
I
guess
it's
you
know.
We
should
also
take
this
into
consideration.
C
But
having
said
that,
I
think
apollo
is,
you
know,
I
think
it's
it's
a
pretty
good
product
market
fit
for,
for,
for
what
dx
tower
is
really
like.
Looking
for
right
and
for
also
like
what
the
stated
purpose
of
dx
ventures
is,
and
from
that
perspective
I
I
think
apollos
might
actually
be
a
very
nice
fit
for
for
the
x
tower.
D
Maybe
I
can
add
some
thing
because
I
did
read
the
stuff,
but
I
didn't
have
time
to
give
really
have
a
second
look
mostly
also
mostly
also
because
I'm
not
you
know
token,
it's
it's
for
me
normal,
but
equity,
it's
a
little
bit
harder
for
me
to
judge,
and
so
one
one
question
is
which
I
don't
understand.
So
how
can
we
what's
the
equity
there
because
they
have
like
this
foundation
or,
however,
they
call
it
a
special
construct
and
if
we
have
equity
in
what
do
we
have
equity
in?
D
D
And
this
is
the
whole
thing-
it's
not
clear
for
me,
but
I
I
think
it's
it's
a
good
product,
so
I
I'm
kin.
I
can't
take
the
contrarian
part
here.
It
looks
like
so,
but
maybe
maybe
because
of
you
have
an
idea
how
the
equity,
how
this
should
work,
because
now
they
have
like
especially
well,
then
the
members
have
there
that
the
voting
rights
in
a
way
so
token
holders
who
are
members
at
the
same
time
we
don't
have
voting
rights
as
it
looks
like,
and
but
if
you
have
equity,
we
need
yeah.
C
Yeah,
so
I'm
not
too
familiar
with
your
police
deal,
but
like
usually,
we
also
like
invest
mostly
into
equity,
and
this
equity
then
usually
at
some
point
converts
into
tokens
on
a
per
rata
basis
and
so
like
what
usually
happens,
like
I
mean,
probably
like
the
uni
swap
and
compound
deals,
are
like,
probably
like
the
most
prominent
ones,
so
100
of
the
investor
equity
turned
into
like
49
or
50
of
the
token
supply,
and
I
think
this
is
kind
of
like
getting
a
bit
standard
in
this
space.
D
Policy
is
quite
different.
I
guess
because
shortly
said,
you
know
that
the
people
who
are
using
police
as
a
as
a
as
a
service-
they
are
the
the
person
who
are
then
have
voting
rights,
have
like
a
mix
between
one
boat,
one
one
person
one
vote,
and
then
they
amplified
somehow,
if
you
hold
the
police
token
or
the
work
token,
they
call
it,
but
it's
very
unclear.
What's
in
a
way.
We
we
don't
have
voting
rights
because
we
are
not
as
a
we
as
a
investor.
We
are
not
member,
and
this
is
yeah.
D
So
there's
a
lot
of
unknown
for
me
still,
and
maybe
we
have
to
ask
them
some
more
question
and
yeah,
because
that's
that's
more
the
and
then
if,
if
this
is
the
case,
so
that
the
structure
structure
is
like
that
they
got
like
yeah.
They
have
like
this
membership,
the
voting
rights.
We
have
equity,
but
we
don't
have
ultimates.
I
don't
know
how
this
works
so
and
also
there's
no
information
about
this.
They
just
added
the
new
information.
It's
that's
now.
It's
equity
before
it
was
even
unclear
that
its
equity
was
more
like
yeah.
D
C
D
I
I
don't
think
that
we
need
voting,
but
the
same
thing
is
just
now:
it
looks
like
you
have
equity
and
then
you
get
a
defined
token
and
they
have
got
these
multipliers
for
the
tokens
and
then
yeah.
It's
just.
I
think
it's
too
much
not
very
well
known
at
the
moment
for
for
me,
but
maybe
we
have
just
to
have
a
second
talk
with
them
and
ask
me
yeah.
D
We
don't
nobody
of
us
has
really
experienced
in
this
area
because
we
are
like
most
of
us
like
token
guys,
you
know,
so
I'm
completely
told
guys.
So
I
don't
know
how
this
kind
of
deals.
I
even
don't
understand
the
language.
Now
I
research,
but
you
know
I
don't
understand
this
kind
of
language
and
yeah.
C
D
You
can
have
a
look
on
again
and
then
I
can
have.
I
can
prepare
some
questions.
I've
got
and
then
maybe
you
can
give
me
some
feedback
on
them
and
then
we
can
hop
on
a
job
calling
them.
They
all
all
those
who
are
welcomed,
and
I
said
the
idea
that
somebody
has
to
take
the
contrarian
view.
I
think
yeah.
That's
that's.
E
C
100
agreed
on
that,
but
then
at
the
same
time
right
the
same
could
have
been
set
for
uber
like
10
years
ago
or
like
for
almost
any
other
company.
You
know
that
really
started
in
the
us
like
for
all
of
them.
It
felt
like
impossible
to
be
kind
of
like
established
outside
the
us
because
they
were
like
so
us
focused,
but
you
know,
like
companies
evolve
over
time,
you
know
they
their
operational
capacities
evolve,
and
so
they
will.
They
usually
also
get
better.
C
At
these
kind
of
things
I
mean,
I'm
not
saying
you
know
that
they
will
have
like
an
easy
way
to
kind
of
like
expand
outside
the
u.s,
but
that's
like
so
many
years
out.
I
would
find
it
very
difficult
to
make
a
prediction
about
it.
B
Just
if
it
overtakes
the
us
or
you
know
a
substantial
market
in
the
us
of
freelancers,
so
that's
kind
of
like
one
and
second,
I
think
like
an
important
element
here
is
you
know
who
we
are
investing
in
and
who
the
team
is,
and
I've
just
worked
with
john
in
east
denver,
and
I
mean
the
guy
is
kind
of
he's
kind
of
crazy
in
some
way,
and
he
just
doesn't
let
go
from
things
which
is
very
weird,
but
I
think
yeah,
I
think
he's
just
gonna.
B
A
I
think
the
most
important
thing
that
christopher
said
was
on
the
check
size
and
I
think
we
should,
regardless
of
the
opposite
in
the
deep
dow
thing.
I
think
that's
like
the
right
approach
we
should
be
having
if
we
are
trying
to
have
something
that
is
yeah
a
million
dollars
like
we
should
be
thinking
about
this
and
that
this
is
going
to
take
a
while
to
deploy
and
we're
going
to
be
pulling
in
small
small
chunks
to
diversify,
and
so
in
this
one
it
would
be
like.
A
I
think
we
should
be
looking
at
like
a
50,
the
50k
level,
and
I
guess,
like
the
only
remember
the
token,
was
that
it
had
a
lot
of
different
kind
of
changes.
As
you
went
up
with
that
so
yeah,
I
think,
regardless
of
the
kind
of
thing
I
think
thinking
about
it
in
terms
of
a
multi,
this
is
something
we're
going
to
deploy
across
tons
of
different
projects.
I
think,
is
a
good
way
of
of
changing
the
framework,
and
then
the
last
thing
I'd
say
is
I.
A
This
is
a
time
where
a
lot
of
people
are
deploying
capital.
There's
a
lot
of
capital
going
around
and
we
you
know
I
just
like.
I
just
think
everyone's
an
incubator
now,
like
everyone's
trying
to
like
you,
know,
provide
some
funding
mentorship,
like
kind
of
all
that,
so
it's
a
competitive
place
right
now,
and
I
know
for
like
deals
that
are
good
that
you
get
access
to
like
those
are
oftentimes,
not
just
because
you
have
capital
it's
because
you've
been
in
the
kind
of
forum
relationships
and
you've
been
doing
it
for
for
a
while.
A
So
I
do
think
this
will
like
kind
of
take
time
for
us
to
build
up
the
capability
to
make
investments
that
like
fit
our
thesis,
because
it
really
takes
like
a
company
and
a
project
to
be
at
like
the
right
stage,
and
I
worry
that
like
right
now,
it's
hard
to
find
companies
and
projects
at
that
perfect
stage
for
geeks
doubt
just
because
it's
a
it's
a
pretty
frothy
market
right
now,.
F
I
think
one
of
the
ideas
on
that
point
of
like
finding
the
projects
is
that,
like
with
some
of
the
stuff,
the
style
is
doing.
We
naturally
see
some
things
at
a
good
stage,
and
I
think,
like
examples
of
that,
that
we
didn't
really
get
in
on
from
an
investment
standpoint,
but,
like
we
were
there
when
it
was
happening,
was
like
radical.
We've
been
talking
to
them
like
when
they
were
doing
bitcoin.
F
Donated
their
bitcoin
grant
tenderly,
we
were
talking
to
them
and
using
their
product
before
they
had
raised
any
capital.
Sorry,
so
I
think,
and
and
we
will
continue
to
like
look
for
things
that
solve
like
decentralization
for
ourselves
and
like
if
we
do
come
across
things
like
that,
then
I
think
those
are
the
opportunities
we
really
should
be
missing.
H
F
One
thing
is
we
weren't
like
formally
organized
right,
so
I
think
the
idea
had
maybe
been
floated
but
like
it
was
never
like
actually
pursued
in
a
serious
sense
right.
I
think
there's
another
issue,
though,
which
is
like
the
like,
who
else
they're
raising
capital
from
in
the
format
of
their
deal
and
whether
like
dx
now,
can
actually
execute
on
it
on
chain
like
so
there
would
be.
H
Yeah,
because
I
was
thinking
like
radical,
makes
so
much
sense
because,
like
we
like,
if
it
succeeds
like,
we
can
use
that
product
like
if
like
we
can
improve
it
like,
we
can
add
something
to
it,
and
I
think
we
should
be
thinking
along
those
lines
like
something
that
we
can
use
that
like
aligns
with
like
our
mission
and
that
we
can
help
out
like
if
we
some
vc,
invest
in
events,
invest
in
some
startup
like
he
usually
sees
like
what
can
he
add
to
it
late?
H
B
All
right
do
we
want
to
try
and
converge
on
a
decision
like
I
don't
know,
I
feel
like.
Let's
say
the
ceiling
is
100k,
we're
not
going
to
be
investing
more
than
that.
I
think
yeah
50k
is
like
the
minimum
right
from
that
thing
and
then
there's
like
a
multiplier.
If
we
invest
100k
and
then
theoretically,
if
let's
say
we
invest
100k
and
then
maybe
people
from
the
exile
want
to
join
in
independently,
but
we
could
somehow
structure
that
that
you
know
we
get
a
higher
tier,
better
multiplier.
B
If
that
even
makes,
if
there's
even
demand
for
that
so
yeah,
I
don't
know
any
thoughts,
50
or
100k.
D
I
would
stay
with
the
50
because,
like
it
looks
like
yeah
even
now,
the
thing
they
provide
it's
it's,
it's
not
very
well
structured
in
a
way-
and
I
miss
things
still,
and
so
I
think
they
have
like
they
have
like
somewhere.
They
are
like
breaks.
You
know
they
have
like
this,
the
structure
they
have
imagine
for
their
members
and
the
equity
structure.
Somehow
they
don't,
they
don't
don't
meet
for
me.
I
don't
see
them
and
they
are
not
able
to
to.
D
It
looks
like
they
re
did
it
and
they
they
changed
a
little
bit,
but
they
are
not
able
to
address
this,
and
I
don't
understand
why
because-
and
I
think,
there's
like
an
unsecurity
in
their
pistol
deal
somehow
or
how
they
think
they
will
work
and
yeah.
So
this
is
the
thing
I
see.
I'm
not
so
convinced
this,
the
main
race,
because
maybe
it
also
will
be,
will
have
some.
D
You
know
they
postponed
this
stuff
and
then
they
have
to
fix
it.
Some,
how
later
and
then
adds
a
lot
of
friction,
so
I
would
not
recommend
to
go
with
hundreds,
because
I
think
there
are
deals
out
there
which
are
no
brain
of
us.
You
know,
then
we
should
really
think.
Okay,
we
are
very
close.
You
can
work
together
and
be
vm
yeah.
We
can
have
feedback
and
help
make
the
product
better
and
all
this
kind
of
stuff
and
then
I
think
100k
it's
totally
fine,
but
for
all
police
yeah,
but
maybe
we
have
really.
D
D
F
D
Shouldn't
necessarily
block
us,
but
yeah
yeah.
I
think
it
would
be
other
a
more
efficient
process
if,
if
two
people
are
researching
it
because
then
in
a
social
process,
it's
easier
to
reach
like
conclusion
and
yeah,
because
it's
also
easy
to
miss
some
aspects,
because
it's
it's
complex,
you
know
it's
not
yeah.
I
I
Maybe
we
can
get
like
a
better
deal
on
the
token
side,
that's
like
for
one
and
in
general
like
if
we
can't
use
the
token
at
all,
and
that
means
it
is
just
like
for
profit
making
and
like
we
saw
with
dmg
dmm
token.
I
My
point
about
that
is
like
if
it's
just
about
making
profits.
When
do
we
know
when
to
sell?
Are
we
actually
like?
I
think
the
d
star
is
not
really
quick
in
making
that
decision.
I
That
basically
means
two
weeks
of
getting
a
decision,
which
means
the
token
could
crash
ninety
percent
in
three
hours,
like
my
point,
is
if
we
just
see
it
as
like
a
good
investment
opportunity,
I'm
skeptical
that
the
d
star
is
actually
like
a
good
candidate
for
doing
those
kind
of
deals,
because
the
exam
is
not
making
fast
decisions.
D
D
There
they
are
fully
trans,
you,
you
you
own
them,
you
can
transfer
them,
but
the
thing
is
yeah
the
token
I
think
the
token
it's
then
it's
really
a
bad
deal.
You
know
because
surprise
we
pay
for
token.
If
you
invest,
fifty
thousand
is
two
dollars
and
somebody
who
invests
like
a
quarter
of
a
million
gets
it
for
40.
D
B
Yeah,
I'm
happy
to
maybe
martin,
like
you
sky
and
myself,
maybe
get
on
a
call
and
try
to
sort
this
out.
Yeah
yeah
come
with
basically
a
proposal.
B
B
Yeah
I
did
want
to
talk
about
deep
down
as
well,
which
is
also
some
that's
a
potential
investment
and
yeah.
I
think
so.
I
think
john.
You
were
kind
of
involved
with
this
and
maybe
a
few
others
yeah.
I
don't
know
any
idea
on
that.
By
the
way
did
they
officially
reach
out
to
us,
or
did
we
talk
to
them?.
F
A
A
I
mean
just
as
a
brief,
like
thoughts
comments
on
it,
like
I
think
deep
down
is,
I
think,
a
little
similar
to
opolis
and
where
I'm
a
little
questions
about
the
token
itself
and
like
what
the
kind
of
on
how
that
kind
of
fits
into
the
investment.
So
that's
kind
of
like
separate
from
what
I
think
about
like
deep
dow
and
I
think,
with
deep
dow.
It
is
well
positioned
because
they
have
kind
of
some
dow
research.
A
I
think
it's
actually
slightly
different
than
boardroom
and
tally,
which
I
think
are
really
great
projects,
but
those
are
a
little
bit
more
focused
on
helping
like
individual
people
find
like
particip
participate
in
governance,
whereas
I
think
deep,
dow
is
a
little
bit
more
about
providing
insight
on
dows
themselves
and
less
about
like
enabling
you
to
to
vote,
or
at
least
that's
the
direction.
I
hope
they
like
go
into
more,
providing
more
information
on
like
dows
and
and
kind
of
like
some
of
the
metrics
there.
A
But
it's
definitely
like
there's
some
overlap
and
I
think
deep
dow
is
yeah
it's
in
an
okay
position.
I
think
we
should
continue
to
like
explore.
More
of
my
questions
around
like
the
token
but
yeah,
I
think
we
need
to
do
some
more
thought.
Thinking
on
this
and
so
nylon
be
good
to
I'd,
be
happy
to
chat
about
the
deep
down
one
with
you
guys.
B
D
Yeah,
maybe
shortly
you
know
it,
I
think,
what's
happening
last
week.
I
just
did
see
it
on
the
weekend.
That
curve
opened
like
a
franchise
on,
and
it's
called
the
ellipses
and
it's
running
on
on
a
balance
chain,
smart
chain
and
in
a
way
they
both
you
know
the
curve
is
it's
the
code
itself?
It's
like
copyrighted,
I
guess,
and
so
somebody
asked
them
to
be
to
if
they
agreed
that
they
make
a
copy
of
it
and
copied
to
psc.
D
I
short
looked
at
the
code
today
on
github.
You
know,
there's
looks
like
it's
just
one
guy
so,
but
in
a
way
they
they
what
they
do
now
they
they
have
like
this
now
running
on
bsc
and
it's
working
and
they
do
an
airdrop
for
the
e-curve
holders
and
they
get
like
a
crowd
of
tokens.
I
guess
and
for
me
it
looks
a
little
bit
also.
It's
like
it
looks
like
it's
a
test
bed
for
curve
to
look
how
these
things
play
out.
D
It's
quite
interesting
what
they're
doing,
because
they
can
move
much
faster
like
this.
They
don't
need
like
their
own
team
and
deploy
it
to
another
chain
and
manage
it,
so
they
they
do
a
kind
of
franchising
and
yeah
the
original
holders,
which
are
also
you
know.
I
think
the
biggest
curve
holders
are
like
the
curved
team
they
get.
They
they
get
a
big
stake
in
the
other
version
running
on
all
the
chain
and
yeah.
It's
just
the
question.
You
know
it's
it's
it's
different.
The
bscc
version
is
a
little
bit
different.
D
Our
earth
token
economics
is
different
from
the
original
curve
and
part
of
the
curve.
It's
in
it's
written
in
solidity.
Well,
no,
no!
It's
it's
in
viper
written
in
viper
and
I
don't
know
if
we
have
to
touch
the
code.
I
don't
think
so,
but
now
the
ellipses
and
looks
like
they
combined
some
original
code
from
curve,
but
the
tokenomics
they
made
for
themselves
and
but
the
first
stage
would
just
ask
them.
D
D
We
can
handle
that
if
he,
if
he
goes
this
direction-
and
you
know
in
a
way,
I
think
we
have
a
good
position
because
now
on
bsc
it
looks
like
it's
just
one
guy
or
two
or
three
people
and
we
as
a
more
established
and
and
yeah.
We
have
like
a
steady
structure
and
we
have
proof
that
we
have
some
now
in
this
area.
So
I
I
guess
why
not.
B
Yeah
nathan,
wait:
are
you
going
to
be
doing
biz
dev,
I'm
not
sure,
because
this
would
be
like
an
interesting
like
thing
to
start.
C
D
Is
that
then,
maybe
if,
if
there's
a
deal
we
have
the
first
token
geek
star
will
have,
is
some
kind
of
franchising
and
not
like?
I
don't
know
how
fast
then
we
can
move.
But
you
know
it's
relatively
fast.
If
we
agree,
maybe
we
can
have
this
product
in
two
or
three
months
running
on
egg
style
and
then
maybe
we
are
faster
than
with
omen
and
somehow
it's
it's
strange
because
then
you
know
we
need
like
a
token,
because
we
have
to
give
give
it
back
to
the
original
performance
but
yeah.
B
Awesome,
okay,
all
right
so
moving
on
the
next
topic,
the
djinn
for
lack
of
a
better
word.
This
could
be
a
fund
or
you
know,
basically,
an
allocation
from
the
geeks
dow
treasury,
for
maybe
a
guild
or
or
a
sub
dao,
or
simply
a
multisig
of
of
maybe
a
few
people
who
are
interested
from
the
community
and
they
can
get
a
decent
amount
of
money
and
use
it
for
farming
staking
in
different
protocols
and
yeah
like
this
is
the
general
idea.
B
A
I
would
just
say,
broadly,
I
think,
we're
on
a
like
both
the
diversification
and
an
increased
risk
path
for
the
treasury,
and
I
think
that
is
like
a
slow
process
and
I
feel
like
yield.
Farming
is
like
maybe
step
five
or
six
and
we're
on
step
like
three
right
now,
since
we
you
know
we
diversified
into
stable
coins.
I
think
that's
really
important,
like
just
over
two
million
on
mainnet
we've
gone
and
put
a
bunch
of
liquidity
into
swapper
right.
A
We
diversified
into
that,
and
I
think,
like
the
next
step,
would
presumably
be
once
we
reach
three
million
in
stable
coins
in
the
treasury,
which
I
think
should
happen
like
early
next
week
mid
next
week.
I
think
we
should
put
those
into
like
yield,
generating
things
probably
more
safe
at
first,
and
then
I
would
imagine
like
the
step
after
that
would
be
like
getting
more
aggressive
with
with
yield
farming,
and,
I
think
yeah.
A
So
maybe
it's
involved
in
that
conversation
about
what
we
do
with
the
next
treasury
authorization
proposal,
like
the
last
one
that
was
were
get
to
three
million
stables
and
then
like.
What
do
we
want
to
do
with
it
there,
but
I
think
we're
we're
still
in
the
process
of
diversifying
and
increasing
our
risk
exposure
now,
and
that's
primarily
what
stables
and
putting
it
in
to
swap
her.
B
H
B
B
I
think
some
people
talking
about
keeper
dao
and
then,
like
maybe
one
more
and
then
this
is
just
probably
more
than
ten
percent
yearly
api
on
eth
at
any
of
these
things
so
like
like
I'm
wondering
if
there's
like
any
objection
to
something
like
that-
and
this
will
probably
be
will
need
to
be
done
through
a
multi-sig.
B
A
I
would
just
say
I
think,
like
moving
funds
like
this,
it's
just
like
a
big
process,
so
I
feel
like
we
need
to
think
about
more.
Like
what's
yeah
like
I
guess
it's
taking
us
a
long
time.
I
think
to
get
funds
into
swapper
and
like
or
just
like,
it's
a
you
know.
We
have
to
do
proposals,
we
have
to
kind
of
like
talk
about
it,
so
I
feel
like
that's.
We
need
to
like
focus
on
those
treasury
movements
before
like
getting
like
crazier,
but
I
know
I'm
probably
less
dj.
F
I
don't
think
it's
necessarily
crazy
if,
if
the
portion,
you
know
if
no
one's
talking
about
100k
or
something
you
know,
I
mean
some
of
the
biggest
liquid,
like
lp
liquidity
providers.
What
are
they
even
called
limited
partners?
Still
the
same
thing
for
like
venture
funds
are
like
school.
F
Having
a
small
portion
of
the
treasury
like
dedicated
to
like
high-risk
moves
is
not
a
bad
idea.
I
mean,
I
think
the
the
main
thing
here
is.
We
need
somebody
to
like
manage
it
like
somebody
needs
to
like
identify
the
opportunities
like
spread
out
across,
probably
more
than
one
or
two.
We
could
even
do
some
things
like
have
the
farming
contracts
like
vetted
by
an
auditor
and,
like
you
know,
do
a
little
bit
of
due
diligence
around
that,
like,
I
don't
think.
F
Need
it
to
be
in
a
multi
signal
either,
like
I
mean
yeah
like
if
there's
a
rug,
you're
not
going
to
move
out
like
instantly,
but
I
mean
it's
hard
to
do
that,
even
as
like
an
individual
anyways
so
like
I
think
we
just
we
shouldn't
be.
We
should
be
a
little
conservative
and
not
be
doing
like
the
most
risky
type
things,
but
I
think.
I
I
I
don't
see
an
issue
with
allocating
100k
in
like
yield
farming
stuff.
My
only
viewpoint
is
which
is
important
for
me.
Is
that,
like
the
people
who
are
controlling
the,
the
money
should
have
like
a
proper
rep
amount,
just
like
to
keep
balances.
E
Well,
I
think
I
think
if
if
this
is
yet
another
multisig
thing,
then
I
think
we're
getting
to
the
point
where
it's
time
to
decentralize
the
you
know
the
distribution
of
of
multisig
members,
because
it
feels
like
at
the
moment
it's
always
pretty
much
the
same.
So
that's
maybe
something
to
think
about
for
the
future.
I
F
G
I
second
john,
if
no
meltdown
that
would
be
best,
but
then
how
many
people
would
are
you
thinking
like
a
guild?
How
are
you
thinking
in
any
way
no.
F
F
Can
still
just
do
a
normal
vote
through
the
multi
call
to
to
pause
it
into
whatever
right
and
then
to
collect
it
later.
A
I
I
guess,
like
I
am
trying
to
come
off
more
pessimistic
initially
like
I
am.
I
definitely
think
this
is
something
that
could
bring
returns
and
like
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
I
guess
just
like
what
john
says
it
does
require
like
a
bit
of
effort
to
do
it,
and
it's
not
just
like
send
underneath
to
that,
and
so
I
think
yeah.
I
think
we
should
just
be
thinking
about
what
the
process
is
for
that
and
what
are
like
who's
doing.
A
A
F
F
The
blocker
is
not
the
technology,
it's
doable
with
the
multi
call.
We
already
have
it.
It's
not
like.
There's
no
technological
blocker.
Here,
it's
like
what
are
we
doing
and
who's
who's,
doing
the
due
diligence
on
what
we're
doing
right
and
then
yeah.
So
I
mean,
if
there's
somebody
who
wants
to
be
like
the
ex
d
gen
like.
F
G
F
D
A
A
We
should
be
figuring
and
thinking
strategically
about
this,
but,
like
you
know,
I
want
to
talk
about
like
swap
our
next
stop
right,
like
that's
a
great
product
like
we're,
probably
a
deep
style
product
we
have
now
that,
like
we
could
be
driving
like
you
know,
users
towards
like
media
attention
towards
everything
towards
and
figure
out
how
to
like
work
on
that.
Rather
than
like,
how
can
we
squeeze
out
some
more
yield
so.
F
F
With
the
swapper
ui
and
like
we
gotta
think
creatively
like
we
should
be
hesitant.
There's
like
I
know
things
take
time
and
process,
but,
like
that
doesn't
mean
we
shouldn't,
do
them
like.
A
D
D
We
should
have
a
similar
approach
to
the
expansion.
We
should
not
like
just
take
anybody
who
is
out
there.
We
should
like
try
to
connect
to
them
and
then,
if
there
is
some
interest,
then
it
also
can
benefit
our
the
rest
of
the
organization
and
then
it's
not
just
simple
farming,
it's
more,
it's
more
targeted,
but
then
there's
more
risk.
You
know
because
then,
mostly
these
are
new
projects
and
then
yeah.
The
risk
is
higher.
Yeah.
B
I
I
I
don't
think
we
should
be
doing
like
yeah
liquidity
farming
for
something
that
could
bring
sixteen
hundred
percent.
I
I
don't
think
this
this,
I
don't.
I
don't
think
this
is
for
the
dig
style
appetite.
Basically,
I
would
say
that
we
should
use
something
like
urine
or
sushi
or
you
know
balancer,
like
you
know
the
well-established
ones
yeah.
G
Right
so
to
me
like
I'm,
I
would,
I
think,
it's
kind
of
like
the
same
discussion.
We
are
like
you're,
saying,
martin
with
the
x
ventures.
I
think,
since
we
all
have
our
own
responsibilities
with
the
dow,
if
anyone
can
actually
set
some
time
aside
to
write
something
up.
What,
like
you
know
how
much
for
urine?
Why
earn
right
like
why
why
this
project
break
it
down
like
what?
What
that
should
look
like?
G
If
all
goes
according
to
plan,
then
we
can
just
kind
of
move
forward
and
that
person
kind
of
falls
into
the
position
of
being
the
you
know,
trusted
person
to
start
doing
the
degen
100k
like
just
distribution
and
then
whoever
else
wants
to
say
hey.
I
think
we
should
put
this
amount
of
money
in
writes
something
up
and,
and
does
it,
but
if
like
no
one
has
time
to
take
it
on,
then
it's
like.
A
I
I
do
I
do
think
in
like
the
next
month
or
two
we
should
look
to
make,
I
think
nylon
said
urine
or
rari
like
like
a
very
standard
like
100
eth
200,
where
we're
keeping
our
eat
exposure
we're
getting
some
apy
like.
I
think
that
is
like
a
maybe
low
risk,
one
that
will.
We
can
maybe
like
talk
about
about
a
larger
like
what
are
we
doing
at
the
treasury,
and
I
think
we
can
actually
continue
this
conversation
just
to
plug
next
thursday.
A
B
Decision
all
right,
so
I
guess
that's
that
trying
to
think
who
wants
to
be
a
part
of
this.
I
think
dave,
I'm
not
sure
how
much
experience
you
have
with
these
things,
but
you're
you're
you're
like
applying
for
the
treasury
right.
So
wondering
like,
like
I'm
happy
to
work
with
you.
I
don't
have
you
know
much
time
personally
to
actually
like
see
this
through,
but
I'm
happy
to
like
work
with
you
on
this.
J
B
D
Maybe-
and
I
think
it
also
changed
a
little
bit
now-
yearn
yan
had
like
a
slow
start
and
they
they
had.
They
needed
a
lot
of
time
to
get
the
system
running.
But
now
it
looks
like
yeah.
It
looks
very
promising
for
me.
For
me,
it
looks
like
they,
they
have
now
good
project
and
they
have
a
nice
setup.
They
have
the
community
and
so
yeah
and
also
I've
been
hacked
once,
but
that's
how
it
is
so.
I
would
like
to.
F
I
mean
another
way
to
look
at.
This
is
like
how
do
we
generate
yield
from
the
treasury
right,
not
necessarily
like
the
the
dj
txt
generate
like
and
and
likes
like
we're
just
talking
about
in
the
chat
here?
If
you
get
nine
percent
on
usdc
on
compound,
that's
not
t-gen
right.
So,
if
you're
talking
ten
percent
you're,
not
even
like
in
the
risk
spectrum,
that's
like
you
know,
you're,
not
that
far
along
the
wrong
spectrum.
F
Right
but
that's
a
lot
more
risky
right,
but
like
yeah
but
10
you
can
literally
use
like
some
of
the
most
like
vetted
and
like
high
quality
contracts
in
crypto
right
with,
like
basically
non-crypto
collateral
backing
it
right.
So
but,
like
I
mean,
could
a
process
basically
be?
I
don't
know
dave
what
your
bandwidth
is
like
people
could
propose
ideas
to
dave
dave
could
like
analyze
like
what
the
yields
would
be
right,
like
kind
of
look
at
it
from
a
diversification
thing
you
could,
if
there's
any
smart
contracts.
We
need
to
like
that.
F
That,
like
is
a
separate
process
right,
but
we
could
start
doing
something
like
that.
A
I
could
agree
completely.
I
think
that
should
be
like
there's
like
a
great
process
for
like
treasury
fun
movements
like
where's
this
going
what
are
like
the
risks
involved,
whether
that's
yeah
so
yeah.
I
think
that
makes
we
should
have
a
way
of
like
coordinating
that
information
and
bending
it
for
when
people
are
gonna
are
going
to
vote
on
it.
J
B
So
all
right
that
sounds
good
and
I
guess
we
should
probably
change
the
name
to
dx
yield,
not
the
extent
because
that's
kind
of
like
a
different
thing,
all
right.
I
think
we
have
like
one
last
topic:
the
swapper
on
xdi
discussion.
Chris,
do
you
wanna.
A
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
like
think
about
what
we're
doing.
I
think
you
know
so
a
couple
things
sky's,
not
on
the
call,
but
he's
the
reason
he's.
I
like
all
this
because
he's
on
the
house
token
call
or
dao
house
that's
h-a-u-s,
and
we
actually
had
two
majority
votes
over
the
last
three
days
on
xdi
to
one
change:
the
fees
of
a
house,
weak
pole
to
three
percent
and
two
to
add
house
to
the
token
list.
A
The
token
I
think
is
launching
today
they're
actually
doing
a
separate,
incentivized
farming
campaign
on
honey
swap
for
this.
But
there
were
some
house
token
holders
that
were
wanted.
The
wanted
the
swapper
fee
changes
they
wanted
like
the
high
fee.
So
I
think
that's
like
a
it
could
be
an
exciting
kind
of
opportunity
and
I
just
think
broadly
like
we
have
the
I
think,
230
thousand
dollars
in
wxdi
weath
on
x,
on
xdi
and
then
there's
like
another
400
000
on
the
way
and
a
couple
other
pairs.
So
yeah.
A
I
just
think
like
the
products
at
a
place
now
where
we
can
think
about
like
how
can
we
drive
volume?
Are
there
like
different
communities?
We
should
try
to
be
like
advertising
swapper
in
it's
a
you
know.
One
of
the
key
I
think
great
features
of
swapper
as
a
product-
and
it's
also
going
to
be
appealing
to
other
projects-
is
that
you
can
search
across
any
uni-swap
fork
so
yeah.
I
just
think
that
we
should.
A
We
should
start
thinking
about
how
we
can
try
to
like
drive
some
extra
attention
and
flow
to
to
x
swap
our
next
time.
F
One
thing
that
I
dropped
in
the
chat
over
the
weekend
that
I
saw
on
twitter
was
the
site
d5
llama.
So
I
think
most
people
are
familiar
with
d5
pulse
right,
tracking
tbl
and
a
bunch
of
crypto
projects.
We're
not
on
t5
pulse
in
any
way.
F
But
xdi
is
on
d5
pulses
then,
but
it
seems
like
some
people
on
twitter,
like
including
a
bunch
of
wire
and
community,
are
upset
that,
like
d5
pulse,
is
basically
not
like
maintaining
their
numbers
very
well
and
they're
kind
of
like,
following
which
I
mean,
I
guess,
isn't
necessarily
a
surprise.
F
There's
probably
a
decent
amount
of
work
to
like
track
all
these
projects,
but
like
there's,
this
other
site
defy
llama
and
but
I
don't
think
they're
tracking
x
die
yet
but
they're
getting
a
lot
of
like
traction
on
twitter,
because
people
are
like
look.
These
guys
have
like
their
numbers,
are
more
up
to
date,
they're
doing
more
like
so
I
wonder.
Is
there
something
we
could
do
as
like
a
community
to
try
to
push
that?
F
F
F
You
know
yeah
we
want
like.
I
think
something
like
this,
though,
where
like
trump
it's,
actually
it's
not
about
limiting
and,
like
being
precise,
I
think
you
actually
want
to
create
kind
of
a
ground
swell
so
that
they
see
that
there's
a
reason
to
add
it
right
to
take
the
time
and
prioritize
it.
But.
G
E
E
F
I
don't
we
should
be
updating
the
the
landing
page
as
well
with
like
up
more,
but
I
think
it
does.
The
the
main
page
does
link
appropriately
the
swapper
twitter
does.
E
The
the
swapper
twitter
links
the
normal
swapper.
It
doesn't
link
the
the
x
die
swapper.
Does
it
it's
the.