►
From YouTube: DXbiz Weekly Meeting [2020-09-14]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right
cool
shall
we
move
on
to
the
topic
of
omen
and
ethereum?
I
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
sort
of
sync
up
on
like
what
is
the
latest
with
that
initiative,
and
I
guess
like
timeline
and
what
the
execution
will
look
like,
and
I
guess
how
best
to
to
put
the
message
out
there
to
people
who
who
may
have
been
stopped
by
the
gas
prices.
B
Yeah,
so
I
can,
I
can
do
that.
The
the
smoothness
of
the
plan
got
derailed
a
little
bit
because
there
are
some
technical
issues.
B
This
gets
pretty
complicated
because
omen
uses
smart
contract,
wallets,
ethereum
uses
smart
contract
wallets
and
the
communication
between
those
two
in
the
process
of
using
omen.
It
gets.
It
gets
a
bit
messy
and
something's,
not
working
for
sometimes
like
mainly
like
creating
markets
and
things
like
that.
So
a
lot
of
people.
Some
people
have
had
success
trading
markets
for
free,
using
ethereum,
but
creating
markets
is
still
a
problem.
So
if
identifying
the
problem
and
solving
the
problem
has
has
has
not
been
has
not
been
figured
out.
B
So
that's
why
we
haven't
gone
like
super
wide
with
it.
We've
only
shared
it
among
omen,
telegram
and
dx
dow
community
and
like
one
other
small
community,
but
also
the
drawback,
is
that
a
lot
of
people
don't
have
ethereum
wallets
and
aren't
really
aware
of
it,
and
some
don't
want
one.
It
seems,
and
so
we've
only
had
maybe
17
transactions
so
far
by
probably
eight
or
so
people.
B
So
it
would
be
good
to
have
more
dx
dao
related
people.
Trying
it
out
and
testing
it
before
we
start
tweeting
it
out
to
the
bigger
community.
So
that's
quite
a
few
moving
parts.
The
technical
issue
is
is
a
problem,
because
if
we
announce
this
and
then
like
it
doesn't
work
for
some
of
the
people,
that's
not
a
good
experience
right.
B
So
that's
that's
one
of
the
things
that's
been
holding
it
back
and
we're
still
working
on
the
technical
issues,
but
yeah
and
and
on
top
of
that,
there's
a
plan
to
integrate
off
like
log
in
with
ethereum
into
like
the
omen
experience,
which
has
meta
masking
wallet,
connect
right
now,
so
that's
also
going
to
be
worked
on,
which
makes
it
even
easier
because
the
process,
now
you
kind
of-
have
to
have
ethereum
on
your
phone
if
you're,
using
omen
on
your
laptop,
so
it'll
be
easier.
B
If
you
can
just
log
in
with
ethereum
straight
into
omen,
so
that
will
make
another
obstacle
make
easy
make
it
easier.
B
A
So
I
think
like,
if,
given
we
figure
out
like
the
the
way
to
do
this,
to
use
ethereum
without
without
issues,
I
guess
we
would
have
to
create
and
we
were
comfortable
with
like
putting
the
message
out
there.
We
have
to
create
like
easy
ways
to
tell
people
how
to
like
participate
right.
So
some
way
of
explaining,
like
you,
can
get
it's
possible
to
trade
for
free
for
a
limited
time
on
omen.
B
So
right
yeah
exactly
so
we
we
can
make
that
I
mean
those
steps
are
like,
probably
four
or
five
simple
steps
like
that
you
could
even
tweet
out
I
mean
twitter
and
gnosis,
I
know
was
excited
to
tweet
about
it
too.
So
twitter
is
a
great
way
to
spread
it,
but
we
can
also
drop
those
steps
in
a
bunch
of
different
community
chats
and
stuff
like
it's
not
going
to
get
published
in
some
like
media
publications,
so
we're
just
gonna
once
it
works.
B
B
If
you
try,
if
you
all
try
it,
you
will
see
it's
pretty
amazing,
not
having
to
worry
about
the
gas
like
cost,
because
you
can
literally
trade
any
market
you
want,
even
if
it's
for,
like
10
bucks
or
something
small,
and
you
can
just
start
trying
and
testing
all
these
markets
and
you
can
put
on
the
position
you
want
and
and
the
gas
is
factored
out
factored
out.
So
it's
it's
actually
a
really
good
experience.
A
A
If
anyone
here
knows
like
how
much,
how
closer,
how
much
closer
we
are
to
like
the
official
launch,
we
can
sort
of
strategize
around
like
what
to
do
around
that
from
announcements
to
content,
explaining
the
strategy
and
explaining
the
initiative,
media
appearances
and-
and
I
guess
you
know
it's
a
liquidity
war,
so
we're
going
to
need
people
reaching
out
to
liquidity
providers
and
other
communities.
A
A
And
because
of
that,
you
know
that
they're
now
in
the
mesa
ui,
so
I
think
they
would
be
like
an
easy
layup
for
a
potential
dx
swap
pool,
and
I
think
it
does
hinge
on
how
well
their
sale
is,
and
you
know
how
happy
their
community
is
with
it.
But
I
think
if
we
start
approaching
these
organizations
that
are
very
close
to
this
dow,
you
know
we
can.
A
You
know
we
can
conquer
certain
pairs
and
it's
gonna,
be
you
know
it's
gonna
be
a
very
targeted
approach.
We're
not
gonna
necessarily
win
out
the
gate
on
every
pair,
but
I
think
it's
something
it's
something
to
think
about.
A
Is
there
going
to
be
lm?
What
does
that
mean
according
to
mining?
Oh
sorry
that
is
planned.
I
know
powers
probably
knows
more
about
like
this
timing
of
it
than
I
do.
It
may
be
some
time
after
the
launch.
Does
anyone
want
to
yeah.
C
Okay,
so
we
had
a
call
on
friday
to
follow
up
on
kind
of
yeah
things
to
decide
for
launch
strategy
going
forward
and
from
a
high
level
perspective,
dividing
things
into
a
couple
different
buckets
here.
I've
got
launch
parameters,
iteration
roadmap
and
then
outstanding
questions,
and
I
think
it's
just
important
to
put
these
things
into
buckets
as
we
kind
of
help
prioritize
and
and
focus
on
different
things.
So
launch
parameters
is
what
we
need
to
like
deploy.
C
The
first
set
of
you
know
contracts
what
we
need
to
get
from
the
community,
what
we
need
to
get
and
ultimately
set
as
initial
parameters.
So
really
there
are
like
three
components
to
this:
one
is
fees,
two
is
the
initial
supply
of
funds
from
the
dow's
treasury
and
then
like,
and
then
three
is
deployment
and
fund
allocation.
This
is
the
actual
like
approving
and
how
it
gets
submitted
through
a
proposal.
C
So
in
terms
of
fees,
I
think
these
are
the
only
and
this
is
kind
of
what
I'm
hoping
to
kind
of
finalize
and
and
get
the
community's
feedback
here,
and
so
I
kind
of
try
to
simplify
everything
into
the
things
that
are
actually
needed.
So
the
protocol
fee,
which
is
the
dxt
would
be
the
dx
dow's
take-
is
set
at
one
tenth
of
the
swap
fee.
So
if
it
was
point
three
percent
for
unit
swap,
then
that
would
be
point.
I
mean
point
three
percent
for
a
pool.
C
That
would
be
point:
zero,
three
percent,
if
it's
point
one
percent
for
a
pool.
That
means
point
zero.
One
percent.
The
second
is
default
pool
fee
and
then
the
third
is
the
max
fee,
and
I
don't
know
if
gusto
is
on
the
call,
but
I
wanted
to
talk
about
these
in
a
second
and
then
moving
to
the
sponsored
liquidity.
We
talked
about
this
on
friday.
You
can
kind
of
see
the
initial
ones
there.
This
is
one
million
in
total
liquidity.
C
I
did
add
the
pnk
eth
pair
because
there's
about
fifty
thousand
dollars
worth
of
p
and
k
in
the
treasury,
so
I
think
we
could
dig
style
could
supply
that
as
a
initial
pool
there
and
then
so
for
all
of
these,
of
course,
setting
the
point
one
percent
pool
fee,
so
that's
kind
of
the
the
sponsor
pulls
and
then
there's
actually
like
how
the
funds
get
there,
which
I
don't
know
what
the
kind
of
latest
is
on
working
through
the
relay,
but
just
there's
some
technical
integration
that
needs
to
get
done
there
returning
to
the
fees.
C
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
have
each
of
these
correct.
I
highlighted
the
default
pool
fee
and
the
max
fee
the
default
pool
fee.
I
don't
really
know
I
guess
we
have
to
set
in
some
way,
so
this
would
be
if
someone
came
along
and
wanted
to
create
a
random
pair,
a
pool
for
a
random
pair.
What
is
the
default
pool?
C
What
is
the
default
fee
for
that
pool
so
for
unit
swap,
obviously
it's
0.3
percent,
and
so
I
don't
know
if
we
would
probably
have
to
set
a
default
fee
for
this,
and
I
put
0.1
on
here
because,
if
we're
having
the
dxd
rewards
in
other
pools
right-
and
we
have
the
the
ones
that
we
listed
below
here-
if
we
have
those
pools
that
do
not
have
dx
dial
liquidity,
then
there's
no,
I'm
not
sure
how
we
would
set
the
initial
fee
to
like
0.1
percent.
C
So
I
think
we
need
to
decide
that
and
then
the
max
fee.
I
believe
we
had
hard-coded
in
this
in
at
five
percent,
but
I
think
we
have
to
check
with
the
gusto
on
that
and
so
yeah.
So
these
are
kind
of
what
I
hope
to
nail
down
and
you
can
see
the
next
steps
for
this.
C
I
want
to
post
this
to
the
forum
today
to
get
some
feedback,
allow
the
community
to
see
it,
and
then
I
do
think
it's
good
to
get
a
signal
proposal
for
these
parameters,
maybe
this
week,
which
would
be
separate
from
some
kind
of
like
full
deployment.
Just
so,
we
could
get
some
signal
from
the
comm
from
rep
holders
that
this
is
a
good
way
of
going
forward.
Yeah,
and
then
I
can
talk
about
the
iteration
roadmap,
which
I
think
we
should
do
the
same
thing
there.
C
Yeah
I
mean,
I
guess
the
question
is
for
the
incent
for
the,
so
let
me
just
actually
open
up
this
spreadsheet.
I
think
I
have
it
here
yeah
so
for
these
pools
like
we're
going
to
own
the
liquidity,
because
they
are
supplied
by
dxdown.
That's
going
to
be
a
substantial
chunk
already
and
we're
going
to
set
the
0.1
percent
there,
but
we
also
hope
to
own
these
pools
and
we're
going
to
incentivize
look
deposits
into
them
through
gxd
rewards,
but
we
in
a
perfect
world
to
own
these
pairs.
C
We
also
want
the
fees
on
this
to
be
very
low,
because
that's
what
traders
should
be
paying
so
that's
why?
Whatever
we
set
as
the
default
fee
for
the
whole
protocol
will
presumably
also
affect
the
actually
really
just
these
seven
pairs
here,
because
these
are
the
incentivized
pools
that
do
not
are
not
directly
supplied
by
the
dx
staff
in
terms
of
deposits.
A
C
C
Because
the
ones
that
the
dxdow
is
supplying
liquidity,
it
will
set
the
fee
at
0.1,
but
for
pools
that
it's
not
supplying
liquidity.
It
will
be
whatever
is
the
like
initial
default
fee
and
I
from
a
trader.
If
we
want
to
own
pairs
and
entice
traders,
low
fees
are
the
best,
with
the
hope
being
that
the
low
fees
are
offset
to
liquidity
providers
by
dxd
liquidity
mining
rewards.
B
Yeah
and
some
of
the
liquidity
providers
may
be
those
projects
themselves
right,
so
right,
maybe
what
if
it's
and
you
wanted
something
lower
than
0.3
to
get
aggregator
business,
so
something
between
like
the
middle
would
be
0.15.
B
C
Yeah
I
liked
point
one
five.
I
I
thought
that
was
it,
but
I
only
thought
to
just
if
we're
to
do
0.1
for
our
own
pools,
just
keeping
it
standard,
but
I
think
0.15
like
makes
kind
of
the
most
sense
from
a
like
default
fee.
Still,
not
you
know,
slashing
fees
but
having
a
sizable
difference.
B
A
Yeah,
let's
let
we
could
say
that
yeah
word.
I
saw
a
ln
in
there
they're
really
interested
in
like
yeah
real
partnership
like
real,
like
advisory
like
help
with
governance
like
platform,
integration,
they're
really
like
like
proactive
on
it,
and
it
may
be
worth
like
talking
to
them
to
see
what
could
be.
C
Yeah,
I
agree
I've
like
put
them
in
there,
because
they've
been
so
eager
and
supportive,
but
I
haven't.
Actually.
I
think
we
can
figure
out
something
yeah
more
specific
for
them
too.
D
D
Did
you
want
to
say
something?
I
saw
that
loretta
is
asking
to
speak.
C
Yeah,
let
me
just
say
one
more
thing
and
then
I'll
hand
it
off
on
dx,
swap
so
just
that
you
can
see
the
launch
parameters
and
things
we're
just
talking
about
there.
The
iteration
roadmap
are
things
because
rewards
like
are
not
going
to
be
baked
into
the
protocol.
That's
something
that
we
can
kind
of
have
being
run
on
a
concurrent
track,
and
we've
talked
about
some
of
the
things
there.
C
These
are
the
pools,
we've
kind
of
laid
a
blade
agreed
upon
there
and
then
there's
the
launch
rewards
and
the
long-term
incentive
rewards.
C
The
launch
reward
just
needed
a
little
bit
more
tinkering,
and
then
I
think
we
need
to
do
some
more
research
on
kind
of
introducing
a
time,
decay
on
the
long-term
incentive
rewards
and
then
the
other
two
things
to
think
about
are
just
governance
of
the
pools
and
how
lps
will
interact
with
adjusting
the
fees
or
anything
both
initially
in
that
process
going
directly
through
the
dx
dow
in
in
the
way
it
will
have
to
be
in
the
launch
and
then
also
like
going
forward
with
some
type
of
more
formal
on-chain
voting
and
then
yeah.
C
C
D
Sure
so
we
actually
have
a
few
things
that
we
wanted
to
chat
about.
One
of
them
is
the
the
ad
that
we
have
the
ad
that
you
guys
have
on
on
our
site.
D
So
I
understood
that
daniel
has
talked
about
modifying
it
a
little
bit
and
capping
the
additional
eats
that
we're
getting
to
sorry
to
a
maximum
of
to
eat
for
for
200
clicks
or
that
you
guys
requested
that.
D
Okay,
so
we're
perfectly
fine
with
that.
That's
great
sorry,
that's
absolutely
not
a
problem
and
did
anyone
want
our
comment
on?
D
On
a
specific
I
mean,
I
heard
that
you
guys
are
interested
in
doing
governance
and
as
a
service,
and
this
is
definitely
something
that
would
be
interesting
to
us,
both
in
terms
of
being
involved
in
actual
governance,
which
is
to
be
a
personal
passion
or
in
providing
data
which
big
da
already
does,
and
we
can
give
more
than
that
if
we
could
create
a
stack
together
of
what
it
means
to
actually
do
do
governance
as
a
service.
D
I
was
wondering
if
there's
any
beginning
for
for
designing
some
design
finding
a
service
like.
C
D
E
E
Me
actually
yeah,
we
can
hear
you,
I
think
so.
Basically,
the.
E
To
follow
up
with
your
guys's
ad
banner
on
our
site,
I
wasn't
sure
if
daniel
actually
discussed
topping
it
up
or
not.
So
that's
kind
of
the
question
here.
First.
A
Oh
wow
so
yeah.
I
think
I
guess
we're
coming
up
on
the
end
of
the
first
month
of
the
engagement,
so
we
would
probably
need
to,
I
guess,
get
some
data.
I'm
sorry.
A
If
I
have
not,
if
you
provide
it-
and
I
did
like
missed
looking
at
it,
but
I
think
it
would
be
interesting
to
see
what
the
performance
metrics
have
looked
like
and
of
course
you
know
if,
if,
if
we
hit
that
metric
of
like
the
the
clicks
for
that,
you
know
additional
bounty,
I
I
you
know,
I
suppose
we
must
honor
that
agreement
of
the
additional
payout
for
that.
But
do
you
have
the
analytics
for
any
data
for
the
first
month.
D
Yeah
we
do
actually
we
have
both
google
analytics
and
and
mixpanel.
So
every
view
is
tracked
and
every
click
is
tracked.
I
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me,
but
I
think
return
in
terms
of
the
metrics
we'll
go
over
the
the
50
click-throughs.
D
This
is
pretty
certain,
I'm
not
sure
we'll
reach
more
than
a
hundred
click
crews,
so
it
would
result
in
being
about
half
an
east
at
most
or
really
it
would
probably
be
half
an
east,
but
it's
not
more
than
that
and.
D
The
first
month
for
the
for
the
next
next
few
months,
we're
we're
completely
okay
with
capping
it.
That's
200
click-throughs,
so
to
each
maximum.
A
A
Right,
I
I
think
if
we
look
at
the
data,
I
think
we
can
sort
of
discuss
the
performance
and
effectiveness
of
the
campaign.
I
think
it's
a
great
experiment
to
have,
and
I
think
the
ad
looks
very
good
so
if
you
can
provide
that
in.
A
Dxbiz
channel,
that
would
that
would
be
great
for
us
to
sort
of
look
at
and
discuss.
D
Sure
we'll
do
that
I'll
do
that
next
week,
so
that
we
have
a
little
bulk
of
information.
D
Yeah
so
two
things
again:
if
you
guys
are
interested
in
getting
in
us
being
involved
in
the
idea
of
governance
as
a
service,
we
would
absolutely
love
to
do
that.
This
is
something
that's
very
interesting
for
us
and
whether
we're
helping
with
data
or
actually
being
involved
with
specking
or
designing
the
service.
D
D
So
right
now
we
are
listing
dows
and
ranking
them
by
aum,
which
is
our
default
and
and
several
other
metrics,
which
are
interesting
interesting,
but
the
aur
metrics
is
really
just
checking
what
dials
have
in
their
in
their
ethereum
accounts
and
the
actual
value
is
probably
much
higher.
D
For
example,
if
you
take
the
dx
dow,
which
is
a
classic
example
that
you
guys
own
products
or
you
know-
vcdow's
own
investments
and
other
dolls,
own
non-fungible
assets
like
cars
or
real
estate,
so
doing
this,
this
kind
of
research
and
actual
evaluation
is
really
important
for
the
ecosystem
and
what
we
are
doing
right
now.
We
created
a
proposal
for
doing
the
research
into
the
methodology
and
taking
a
few
dowels
and
running
running
a
very
first
version
of
this
evaluation
to
to
sort
test
it
and
see
where
it
is
so.
D
This
is
the
idea,
I
I
I
think
it's
really.
You
know,
I'm
both
curious
and
I
think
it's
something
that
would
move
every
single
dow
that
is
like
the
dxda
forward
and
the
entire
ecosystem.
It
would
allow
people
from
the
outside
of
our
bubble
to
really
understand
the
value
of
dao,
which
potentially
could
increase
adoption
and
investment.
D
Yeah
yeah
in
that
and
specifically
geared
towards
understanding
value.
So
in
the
end,
giving
a
number
a
number
and
the
range
of
really
a
range
of
numbers
that
this
now
is
a
value
between
this
and
that
and
the
degree
of
confidence
that
we
have
in
our
in
our
evaluation
and,
of
course,
the
metrics.
A
I
think
I
find
that
really
interesting
honestly,
because
each
each
dow
obviously
has
different
goals
and
different
different
metrics
matter
to
to
them,
and
these
dials
operate
so
differently
and
have
varying
levels
of
like
reliance
on
blockchain
and
something
they're
handled
off
chain
to
varying
degrees.
So
maybe
it
does
make
sense
to
sort
of
profile
these
these
organizations
individually,
so
that
so
that
I
guess
maybe
they
can
be
better.
D
C
I
think
that
would
be
really
cool,
actually
they'd
probably
be
interested
in.
I
don't
know
what
that
looks
like,
but
yeah.
I
know
delphi
is
interested
in
kind
of
gathering
data
putting
in
different
things
so
yeah
I
mean
we
can
try
to
figure
a
way
to
get
all
of
us
doing
something.
D
D
So
should
we
post
this
to
a
doll,
talk
and
see
how
the
community
reacts.
A
D
Let's,
let's
create
a
channel
and
start
start
conversing
on
that.
A
Okay,
all
right
yeah
sounds
good.
I
do
want
to
make
some
time
I
guess
for
regarding
rails,
launch
and
just
general
media
updates
and
some
some
content
strategy
ideas.
I
have
in
mind
so
rails,
I
think,
is
really
quick.
I
think
it's
coming
out
pretty
soon
and
we
do
have
like
an
article
in
the
chamber
for
it.
I
think
we're
just
waiting
on
like
a
definitive,
reliable,
like
link
to
to
put
in
it
where
that
version
is.
You
know,
I
don't
know
not
not
buggy.
A
I
think
there's
some
final
things
to
work
out,
shout
outs
to
skye
for
for
testing
back
and
forth
with
floozy
and
giving
some
great
feedback.
I
think
that's
it
on
within
regards
to
rails,
but
yeah
we're
gonna
like
we
have
a
twitter
channel
for
it.
So
that'll
be
kind
of
the
latest
new,
like
social
media,
yeah.
B
Ingomar
is
like
once
federico
says
it's
ready
and
it's
gonna
has
to
be
deployed
to
rails.eth
right
so
that
that's
through
a
proposal.
I
think
so.
Would
you
post
the
article
once
that
proposal
passes
because
that's
when
you
can
actually
go
to
rails.eve
before
that,
you
won't
be
able
to
pretty
much.
A
I'm
fine
yeah,
I'm
fine
with
that,
and
it
probably
makes
sense
to
not
like
share
the
netlify
app
because
then
like
once
it
once
it
like,
resolves
the
rails.etha
like
that.
Well,
I
could
probably
just
edit
it
right,
but
it's
up
to
you
guys,
like
I'm
itching
to
get
this
out
there.
I
know
zoran's
excited
to
have
this
out,
so
you
know
it's
up
it's
up
to
to
you
guys
like
what
what
makes
the
most
sense.
I
think
someone
needs
to
put
the
proposal
in
then.
If
it's.
A
Yeah
with
the
proposal
right,
yeah,
so
yeah,
so
he
the
the
latest
message
in
the
rails
channel.
He
says
he
has
a
few
a
few
last
things
to
fix,
in
which
case,
but
like
after
after
that,
I
think
I
think
yeah
we
can.
We
can
run
that
proposal
and
yeah
yeah
I'll
make
sure
someone
does
it.
A
Myself,
powers
and
john-
and
I
think
it's
really
exciting
and
I
think
it's
a
new
kind
of
direction,
we're
going
with
like
publicity
for
the
dick
style
and
it
might.
It
might
make
sense
that
we
keep
an
eye
out
for
like
further
opportunities
to
make
appearances
and
promote
the
release
of
these
two
new
products.
A
So
yeah.
If
you've,
if
you
guys
see
any
good
conferences
or
or
podcasts
or
if
you
know
someone,
you
can
potentially
get
a
spot
for
the
dick
style
on
like
that.
I
think
that's
a
great
new
thing
to
pursue.
E
I
also
agree
from
a
media
standpoint.
I'm
gonna
pass
you
guys
around
to
the
podcast
that
we
typically
circulate
and
media
just
wanted
to
get
the
okay
there.
So
that's
pretty
sweet.
A
I
do
have
a
a
launch
article
for
dx,
swap
that
I
just
posted
like
shortly
before
this.
This
call
started.
It
would
be
great
to
get
some
feedback
on
that.
I
know
we
can
add
some
more.
I
know
we
could
tweak
some
stuff
and
it
also
in
accordance
with
with
powerstock
that
he
shared
earlier
and
I'm
pretty
confident
like
95,
confident
this.
This
can
get
on
on
hackernoon.
A
That'd
be
great,
I
have
like
a
I'm
like
two
for
two
for
getting
articles
on
hackernoon
so
like.
If
that
doesn't
work,
yeah
we'll
totally
we'll
totally
go
we'll
go
that
route.
100.
F
And
I'm
sorry
anger,
I'm
just
gonna
say
on
that
that
note
the
doing
the
interview
with
bankless
from
it's
the
meet
the
nations
segment,
which
is,
I
think,
with
the
shorter
formats,
but
yeah
I'll
be
doing
that
today.
So
I
imagine
that'll
get
posted
later
this
week.
I
think
I
don't
know,
I
don't
think
he's
on
the
call
this
guy
michael,
who
has
popped
into
the
chats
recently
he's
in
australia.
F
He
kind
of
helped
facilitate
and
set
that
up,
and
he
was
saying
that
you
know
he's
hoping
to
kind
of
leverage,
some
of
the
newer
appearances
that
are
happening
to
like
kind
of
keep
pushing
on
additional
podcasts
as
well.
So
yeah
I
mean
I
agree
with
you
about
this
is
like
a
great
direction
and
I
think.
B
A
B
B
A
I
was
asking
I
was
asking:
where
is
that
nor
designer
guy?
Oh.
F
A
Cool
all
right,
so
we're
we're
coming
up
on
the
hour
exactly.
Does
anybody
have
some
final
words
before
we
adjourn
this
call.