►
From YouTube: DXdev Weekly Sync [2023-03-07]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Disagree:
hola
hola,
welcome
to
the
the
Exile
weekly
developer
call
today
is
7th
of
March
2023.
We
are
going
to
the
usual
Roundup
of
where
our
projects
and
Nelson
Anderson-
oh
sorry
and
Friday
and
Milton-
are
going
to
be
presenting
what
they
have
been
working
on
on
governance,
2.0
and
well.
We
are
very
few
people
today,
I
I,
don't
know
why
maybe
because
eth
member-
but
it
already
finished
right
so
I-
know
why
we
are
so
few
today
anyway,
the
call
is
going
to
be
recording
it
finish.
Kennedy
you
were
there.
B
Yeah,
so
during
the
week,
I
was
basically
focusing
100
on
the
middle
term.
I
participated
with
a
team
and
we
managed
to
win
a
track.
One
of
three
winners
in
the
Darwin
Community,
tooling,
out
of
60
teams,
and
then
we
presented
on
the
main
stage
in
front
of
some.
They
call
it
the
celebrity
judges
that
was
pretty
cool.
B
It's
really
really
fun,
and
apparently
this
year's
eve
Denver
was
not
as
good
as
last
year's
still
pretty
good
A
lot
of
people
not
sure
how
many,
but
more
than
last
year,
unless
you
was
12,
000.
B
lots
of
talks
going
on
side
events,
lots
of
talks
about
CK
CK
had
its
own
day
DK
day,
hotels,
yeah,
I
found
abstraction
yeah
many
new
many
stuff,
like
that.
It
was
a
very
as
usual
with
conference.
It's
really
good.
A
A
A
B
B
A
A
To
show
how
it
works
next
week,
I
see
something
very
interesting.
Where,
again,
we
need
to
start
thinking
of
how
to
use
it
now,
despite
I'm
not
going
to
be
in
the
in
in
around
the
future,
but
it's
something
that
can
give
us
a
lot
of
a
big
competitive
advantage
on
on
some
of
our
tools.
So
again,
this
is
something
that
we
need
to
start
researching
and
understand
how
it
works.
Now,.
C
A
D
E
So
I
don't
have
many
updates
on
the
front
and
Cycles
I'm
usually
not
aware
of
that,
but
we
are
doing
some
research
on
what
can
we
add
on
top
of?
Oh
here,
you
think
onto
property
three.
We
also
do
interview
on
the
dca's
contracts,
internal
review
and
then
getting
ready
for
for
Audi
does
well,
but.
F
F
Okay,
sorry
I
was
I
was
in
the
carrot,
call
no
worries
so
so
I,
don't
know
what
Nelson
mentioned.
E
I
just
updated
on
some
of
the
research
we
have
been
doing
on
on
the
unib3
to
as
an
adult
preparing
when
when
we
can
use
it
and
see.
If
we
can
reply
a
between,
you
know
the
changes.
F
So
what
we
are
working
on,
the
DAP
side
is
mainly
integrating
li-fi,
I,
think
I.
F
Think
vixi
is
working
on
it
well,
who
is
working
on
it,
and
we
should
probably
be
ready
for
review
today
or
tomorrow,
and
then
we
are
working
on
an
investigative
task
where
we
are
seeing
if
we
can
use
gelato
to
place
limit
orders
on
univ3
and
and
then
yeah
Nelson's
working
on
a
bunch
of
contract
items,
I'm
sure
that
he
would
have
provided
a
better
update
this
on
the
zapping
contracts
and
and
DCA
contracts,
and
what
else.
F
Yeah
yeah
yeah,
so
yeah.
So
what
happened
was
the
graph
had
some
problems
or
they
they
did
some
updates
in
arbitrum,
so
we
were
always
out
of
sync.
So
what
happened
with
that
was?
F
We
users
were
unable
to
see
the
liquidity
page,
so
we
had
to
kind
of
do
on
hotfix,
to
release
a
19.1
just
to
fix
that,
and
it
also
included
a
few
other
items
that
about
use
fathom
and
a
fix
where
we
were
not
sending
events
out
in
use
fathom
whenever
coin
gecko
was
erroring
out
in
their
API,
so
we
fixed
that
as
well.
So
it
was
a
very,
very
small
release,
just
to
fix
just
to
fix
the
issue
where
a
swapper
liquidity
page
was
not
accessible
at
all.
A
Behind
it,
yeah
okay,
if
that
is
everything
known
on
swapper,
what
what
news
do
we
have
about
carrot?
I
know
that
you
guys
have
just
came
from
a
hard
call.
F
Yeah
Diego.
A
Yeah,
you
can
continue
go
ahead.
I
can
imagine.
F
F
The
front
end
is
not
connected
with
the
latest
versions
of
the
template,
so
Federico
is
working
on
that
he's.
Also
working
on
the
Oracle
creation
form
the
KVA
token
creation
form
it
is
almost
ready.
He
says
that
it
needs
a
little
bit
more
refinement,
then
Diego,
sorry,
always
working
on
the
Oracle
page.
That
is
missing
now,
I
think
yeah,
I
think
I,
think
that
should
be
done
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks.
F
I
think,
oh
sorry,
yeah
and
then
Diego
is
working
on
the
filtering
page
to
do
some
searches
and
in
the
all
campaigns
page.
So
this
is
what
we
are
working
on:
the
carrot
and
I'm
guessing
that
it's
like
this
final
push
that
we
are
doing
and
in
about
two
or
three
weeks
it
should
be
in
a
state
where
we
could
start
using
it
or
at
least
internally.
We
should
be
in
a
position
to
start
testing.
It.
A
A
C
Yeah
I
think
I
can
give
him
upgrade
Okay,
so
so
we
are
basically
going
to
launch
the
3.1
release,
probably
in
tomorrow
or
the
day
after.
The
proposal
is
actually
live
now
on
mainnet
in
the
next
calculate.
So
this
is
actually
kind
of
a
big
release.
C
We
are
basically
like
finally
moving
to
using
a
subgraph
or
not
this
chain.
C
This
adds
like
additional
features
that
we
could
not
build
with
just
contracts,
the
permissions
page
and
the
members
page
basically,
and
also
like
we
have
a
overview
on
all
the
words
that
have
been
like
added
to
the
added
to
a
proposal,
and
the
nice
thing
is
like
we
have
fallback
to
our
pieces
in
case,
if,
like
the
sub
graph,
is
lagging
behind,
we
just
like
gracefully
fall
back
and
then
like
wait
until
the
subgraph
catch
us
up
and
yeah.
D
C
Like
more
improvements
around
how
we
handle
discussions
and
proposals
now,
discussions
and
proposals
are
linked
together.
So
when
you
create
a
proposal,
it
links
to
the
discussion
that
you
were
on
and
from
proposal.
If
you
open
a
proposal,
you
can
just
go
back
to
the
discussion
and
vice
versa
as
well,
and
when
you
try
to
create
a
proposal,
it
will
just
populate
everything
from
the
discussion
that
you
are
on
so
yeah.
Just
nice
features
around
how
we
handle
proposals
to
discussions
flow,
and
we
also
have
a
more
fancy.
C
Word
chat
as
well,
and
we
also
want
to
have
the
capability
to
edit
discussions
so
yeah.
You
can
just
edit
the
discussion
on
the
app
itself
and
we
will
probably
also
add
like
change,
lock,
management
and
stuff
in
the
future
and
yeah
it's
coming
soon
is.
Basically,
we
are
going
to
move
to
the
decentralized
subgraph.
We
are
still
using
the
hostage
service
right
now,
but
yeah
I
think
we
can.
We
don't
have
any
other
lockers,
so
we
can
just
move
to
the
defender
subgraph.
C
At
this
point,
we
are
also
going
to
integrate
calls
up
with
the
limit
order.
Functionality
that
console
provides
and
tenderly
recently
launched
this
transaction
bundling
feature
so
that
transaction
that's
for
simulation,
so
you
can
basically
simulate
a
bunch
of
transactions
now,
so
we
are
going
to
handle
that
and
yeah
that's
about
it.
C
I
think
we
will
discuss
more
about
like
these
new
features
that
we
are
working
on
once
once
we
actually
ready
to
launch
okay
yeah,
it's
10
early
yeah,
that's
about
it!
I
think
we
have
a
demo
already
today
or
like
technical
walkthrough
called
walkthrough
on
the
2.0
work,
so
yeah
Audio,
Augusta.
A
D
D
D
Can
see
it
right?
Yes,
awesome,
so
I,
I
guess
at
the
point.
Everyone
knows
moral,
that's
what
governance
2.0
is
about
the
the
many
ideas
to
let
the
XD
holders
be
part
of
the
Dao
in
the
in
the
proposals.
So
right
now
on
the
web
holders
can
vote
and
make
decisions
from
governance,
2.0
and,
of
course,
both
webholders
and
these
the
holders
are
going
to
be.
A
voting,
are
going
to
be
voting
on
purpose
of
something
else.
So
how
are
we
going
to
do
this?
D
We
are
going
to
combine
both
tokens
into
a
single
one,
which
is
going
to
be
the
voting
power
and
the
way
we
are
going
to
combine
this
is
by
having
weights
on
each
one
a
so.
For
example,
let's
say
we
want
to
have
50
a
oh
wait
on
the
reputation
side
and
50
on
the
on
the
dxt,
this
parameters
and
it
can
be
adjusted
at
any
time.
D
So
some
considerations
about
this.
Of
course,
one
rep
is
not
necessarily
equivalent
to
one
dxc,
because
the
total
supply
of
each
token
is
different
and
it's
also
going
to
be
different
in
the
future
because,
for
example,
the
reputation
token
is
inflationary,
so
we
have
to
normalize
these
values
in
the
evolving
power
formula
and
the
way
to
normalize.
This
is
by
dividing
everything
by
the
total
Supply.
So,
for
example,
here
let's
say
that
Alice
has
a
red
balance
of
one
rep
and
the
2005
is
10
rep.
D
That
means
that
she
has
a
10
of
the
total
rep
Supply,
and
this
is
the
value
that
we
are
going
to
use
in
devoting
power
formula
that
is
going
to
be
used
for
the
Dao.
She
also
has
10
dxt
and
the
total
supply
of
the
DxD
is
1000.
Dxt,
they
said
was
a
one
percent.
So
in
this
a
simple
example:
Alice
has
5.5
percent
of
the
voting
power.
D
Second,
when
when
I
mentioned,
DC
I
actually
mean
do
you
see
that
Alice
has
to
say
in
order
to
get
this
DSC
influence
in
in
the
golden
hour?
We
are
going
to
talk
more
about
this
later.
D
A
third
there's
going
to
be
a
minimum
threshold,
a
below
that,
if
it
total
States
sorry,
if
it
total
DxD
state,
doesn't
Reach
This
threshold.
D
The
dxt
part
of
the
formula
is
going
to
ignored
and
that
was
going
to
fall
back
to
the
previous
system,
in
which
100
of
of
the
volume
power
was
in
the
hands
of
the
reputation
holders.
A
fourth.
D
We
are
going
to
need
a
new
reputation
contract
which
is
actually
very
similar
to
the
the
old
one,
and
the
only
thing
that
we
are
going
to
change
is
we
need
a
callback
now
is
going
to
which
were
on
every
snapshot
in
order
to
notify
the
voting
power
contracts
that
a
modification
in
the
reputation
balance
has
happened.
D
F
D
D
So,
let's
dive
a
little
bit
into
the
this
is
taking
the
DC
influence.
So
when
someone
Stakes
DST
a
he
will
get
a
certain
amount
of
influence.
So
it's
not
1dxd
a
one.
This
is
taked
in
the
water
power
formula.
I
just
wanted
to
have
a
little
bit
different
and
the
motivation
behind
that
is
that
we
want
long-term
DC
holders
to
have
a
stronger
voice
than
short
term
holders,
so
the
longer
holders
they
see
in
the
second
contract,
the
more
going
the
more
governance
influence
they
should
get.
D
So,
for
example,
let's
say
Alice
decides
to
locked
10
dxt
for
six
months
for
that
she
will
get
13
dxt
influence
depending
on
the
parameters
of
the
formula
and
if
she
then
decides
to
log
another
index
D,
but
this
time
for
one
month
she
will
get
less.
She
will
get
only.
Let's
say
seven
DC
of
influence
so
now
Alice
has
take
20
dxt
and
has
2060
of
influence.
D
For
four
years,
and
because
of
the
formula
and
how
the
motorbike
Works,
he
will
get,
let's
say
20
BC
of
influence.
So
the
longer
you
stay
the
more
the
influence
you
get,
but
then
it
comes
to
Chris.
He
tries
to
gain
the
system
and
logs
five
dxt
for
four
million
years,
but
this
is
actually
not
going
to
be
allowed
in
the
system,
because
there
is
going
to
be
a
Max
maximum
limit
to
to
the
time
you
could
make
the
stake.
So
this
time
of
operation
will
revert.
D
D
Each
one
of
these
terms
is
going
to
have
a
multiplier
which
is
going
to
be
controllable
and
can
be
adjusted
at
any
moment,
and
the
idea
behind
this
is
that
in
the
exponential
term
of
the
formula
a
we
can't
modify
that
after
deployment,
so
the
exponential
term
is
going
to
be
fixed
and
in
order
to
have
something
like
a
a
possibility
for
operations
in
the
exponential
form
of
this
function,
we
can
use
a
linear
combination
of
these
these
terms.
So
this
looks
something
like
this.
D
Let's
say
we
we
make
the
linear
multiplier
zero.
We
have
this
pure
exponential
form,
which,
if
you
look
closely,
which
means
that
long
term
holders
are
going
to
have
more
voting
power,
but
for
each
marginal
increments
they
are
going
to
have
less
and
less
and
less
a
extra
Baltimore.
D
If
we
make
the
exponential
multiplayer
zero,
we
have
like
a
linear
formula
and
anything
in
between.
We
have
a
combination
of
of
value
for
the
multiplayers,
so
some
technical
notes
all
this.
If
the
parameters
of
the
formula
are
wrongly
set,
the
influence
formula
can
give
negative
values,
which
is
kind
of
strange,
but
this
is
very,
very
simple
to
to
check
and
the
Dao
should
make
sure
that
this
doesn't
happen
when
both
in
the
the
formula
parameters.
D
D
So
how
are
we
going
to
implement
this
on
chain?
The
steps
are
quite
simple.
First,
we
have
to
deploy
the
new
sets
of
Tau
contracts
that
lexov
has
been
working
on.
We
have
to
migrate
the
reputation
contract
because
it's
not
upgradable.
D
D
We
have
to
deploy
a
new
voting
machine
and
scheme,
taking
this
into
account
so
before
a
reputation
was
being
used
as
about
the
power,
and
now
we
have
a
special
contract
for
that,
so
that
was
changed
and
we
also
are
going
to
be
using
DFC
for
boosting
purposes
and
last
we
have
to
register
this
new
scheme
so
that
it
can
start
using
the
new
routing
power
method.
D
D
It's
intention:
the
ownership,
actually
a
trade
yeah,
so
I,
guess
that
you
can
you
can't
individually
trade
stake
DxD,
let's
say
Alice
has
take
this
10
dxt.
She
can't
put
this
into
unisop
yeah
and
trade.
It
or
she
can't
sell
one
DC
of
those,
but
she
can
change.
She
can
sorry
she
can
sell
the
ownership
of
this
state
commitment,
which
also
has
the
voting
power
in
it.
A
Also,
sorry,
just
what
this
is
the
only
thing
that
can
be
like
kind
of
trading
of
the
DXE
estate
right,
but
it's
not
the
same
for
the
reputation.
So
there
is
a
part
that
you
cannot
right.
The
reputation
is
still,
how
can
we
say
non-transferable,
and
this
is
like
owner
ownership-
transferable,
the
the
existing,
and,
if
you
do
it,
we
will
know
about
it,
because
all
that
is
public
and
I.
Don't
know
how
the
community
is
going
to
react
about
that.
A
But
everything
that
you
do
there
if
you
transfer
the
ownership
of
the
XCS
take
we
are
going
to
know
about
it.
G
G
G
A
good
amount
of
DxD
and
I
would
you
know
that's
something
that
I
think
is
important
for
influencing
deep
Styles
future
operations
and
I'm
willing
to
kind
of
commit
to
that.
But
I
also
think
you
know
that
is
like
money
in
capital
base.
That
is,
will
want
to
be
put
to
work
in
some
way
and
so
I'm
trying
to
think
trying
to
think
of
how
the
relationship
will
go
through
of
whether
people
want
a
stake
for
how
long
and
then
like.
If
something
does
come
up
that
they
need
the
capital
like.
G
How
does
their
ability
do?
They
have
an
ability
to
be
able
to
withdraw
that,
or
is
it
locked
up
in
there
I
imagine
like
and
thinking
from
yeah
from
can
you
Fork
I
would
probably
want
to
have
basically
staking
and
unstaking
a
lot
of
DxD
like
on
a
rolling
basis
like
going
forward,
so
I
always
had
some
dxt.
Maybe
that
was
like
unstaking,
but
I
always
was
kind
of
like
staking
some
DxD
in
the
future,
or
balancing
that.
But
it'll
be
interesting
to
know
how
the
staking
DxD
Market
would
work.
G
And
then
I
had
a
question,
maybe
the
same
with
that
Ross
or
someone
that
Ross
had
here
I
just
maybe
first,
why
is
there
a
minimal,
DxD,
State
or
I?
Guess
there's
a
threshold
in
the
right
way
and
then
is
that
like
a
global
constraint,
I
think
or
a
individual
requirement.
D
Yeah,
so
this
minimum
dxc
is
global.
It's
yeah
individual
requirement
and
the
idea
is
that,
because
the
XP
influence
or
this
state
is
not
the
same
as
DxD,
it
could
happen
that
any
given
point
in
time
the
total
dxt
it
becomes
too
low
and
that's
an
opportunity
for
someone
to
attack
the
the
governance.
A
Let's
say,
let's
say
that
you
have,
for
example,
the
composition
is
about
50
and
50
right,
and
you
have
a
total
supply
of
DxD
that
went
very
low
here.
You
have
a
Pluto
gas
attack
that
you
can
that
you
can
affect
that.
You
can
do
because
the
token
is
insist
right,
so
you
can
easily
access
like
a
big
chunk
of
EXE.
A
If
DSD
you
have
a
very
low
Supply
and
it's
essentially
like,
for
example,
50
of
the
voting
power
composition.
You
can
maybe,
with
the
right
amount
of
funds
with
the
right
amount
of
funds,
easily
acquired,
10
or
20
percent
of
reputation
right.
So
let's
say
that
the
Exile
has
I
know
like
a
hundred
million
soldiers
in
Treasury
and
executing
this
attack
is
going
to
cost.
You
I
know
like
one
million
dollars
to
get
20
right,
so
the
idea
here
is
to
put
a
minimum
of
okay.
A
A
G
G
A
A
Well,
the
DSD
that
is
log
that
is
stake.
It
cannot
be
used
to
boost
you.
Can
you
have
to
use?
You
have
to
use
DxD
outside
the
dxes
like.
D
And
kind
of
benefits
withdraw
early
increase
with
a
boost.
Supply
am
not
right,
I
understand
negotiation,
so
the
DxD
state
has
not
nothing
to
do
to
use.
They
see
that
this
one
should
be
used
for
boosting
proposals.
D
G
D
A
D
A
Icon
icon,
the
1.5
iteration
will
be
step
one
and
two
where
we
will
need
to
deploy
a
new
controller,
Avatar
and
repetition
contract,
and
we
are
going
to
be
using
the
Excel
on
this
new
dial
that
we
are
going
to
migrate,
that
we
are
going
to
use
that
we
are
going
to
Fork
this.
That
is
going
to
be
the
governance
1.5,
the
one
that's
having
now.
This
is,
and
everything
and
the
step
three
four
and
five.
A
These
are
going
to
be
the
implementation
of
governance
2.0,
where
we
are
going
to
deploy
the
voting
power
Contra,
the
DX
State,
the
DXE
influence
contracts.
So
now
what
we
are
going
to
be
for
what
we
are
going
to
be
testing
is
governance
1.5
on
Davi,
the
guys
are
already
working
on
it.
A
We
are
going
to
be
testing
a
sepolia,
an
OC
chain
and
mainnet,
and
then
we
are
going
to
have
like
an
alpha
version
of
the
governor
2.0
that
we
are
going
to
be
sharing
it
gradually
that,
hopefully
it's
going
to
be
in
a
few
months
ready
to
be
using
sepolia
and
and
that's
it
that's
a
plan.
The
we
have
to
deploy
a
lot
of
contracts
and
the
existing
the
voting
power.
A
lot
of
documentation
is
going
to
be
a
huge,
a
big
change
in
the
UI
on
on
Davi.
So
this
is
going
to
take.
A
Bringing
this
on
production
is
going
to
take
a
lot
of
time
where
I'm
I'm
talking
about
the
combination,
the
governor,
2.0
right.
So
again,
what
we
are
going
to
have
very
soon,
maybe
in
a
month,
ready
to
be
used
in
symbolia,
and
you
guys
will
be
able
to
play
around
this
again.
The
new
governance
1.5.
That
is
exactly
what
I've
been
using.
A
What
we
have
been
using
so
far,
but
the
main
change
is
that
we
are
going
to
have
DXE
for
a
stake
and
we
are
going
to
have
the
quality
schemes
where
you
will
be
able
to
create
to
submit
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
course,
proposals
and
it's
going
to
be
a
lot
more
flexible.
Then
this
is
what
is
going
to
be
happening
after
that.
So
again,
a
lot.
G
C
D
E
A
C
A
E
A
So
governance
1.5
is
your
deployment
of
the
doubt
right
he's
it's
an
it's
a
new.
It's
a
new
doubt
that
we
are
going
to
be
deploying
that
is
all
going
to
be
deterministic.
Then
we
are
going
to
have
the
Avatar
replicating
in
multiple
Networks
they're.
D
A
Are
listened,
yeah
I
think
they
are
listening
to
me.
Are
they
yes?
Okay,
okay,
yes,
okay,
yeah!
So
then
Governor
2.0
is
going
to
be
an
upgrade
over
this
over
this
migration
that
we
are
going
to
start.
What
this?
What
does
this
upgrade
means?
This
upgrade
means
that
the
only
thing
that
we
are
going
to
have
to
change
right
over
the
new
Avatar
controller
reputation
that
we're
going
to
be
deploying
are
going
to
be
receiving
new
schemes
that
are
going
to
use
a
new
body
machine
that
is
going
to
use
a
voting
power
token.
A
A
Current
contracts,
Governor
1.5,
is
going
to
happen
in
the
in
in
a
few
months
because
we
just
received
the
audit
and
it
has
been
approved
and
the
guys
on
DX
copy
working
on
the
Derby
interface
and
Governor.
2.0
is
going
to
happen
later.
This
year-
and
that
is,
that
is
the
plan.
We
cannot
estimate
right
which
moment
and
when
it's
going
to
happen,
but
I
think
that
at
the
end
of
the
year
we
are
going,
we
are
going
to
have
something
ready
to
be
used
on
at.
A
I
I
know
that
this
might
be
a
bit
confusing
and
we
are
going
to
be
working
with
Ross
later
on,
trying
to
communicate
in
a
in
an
initial
way
the
next
steps,
but
everything
is
moving
forward
and
well
everything
that
they
have
presented,
that
fair,
presented.
Milton
was
involved
as
well
and
they
have
been
working
together
on
these
components.
2.0.
C
C
A
A
A
G
G
To
see
the
the
presentation
and
all
the
work
for
this
and
yeah
it's
you
know,
even
you
can
tell
that.
There's
still
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done.
You
we
just
there's
like
a
better
idea
of
how
that
work
needs
to
be
done
and
like
what's
the
overall
structure
for
that
and
I
think
yeah.
G
Even
the
formula
right
there
is
really
great,
because
we
could
even
start
like
experimenting
with
that
itself
for
governance
separately
from
like
doing
it
on
chain,
so
I
think
that's
really
cool
I
think
it
would
be
awesome
also
to
have
this
as
a
maybe
a
dow
talk,
post,
I,
don't
know
if
you
guys
are
thinking
of
that
too,
but
the
slides
here
and
then
linking
to
the
GitHub
and
some
of
the
background
here
I
think,
would
be
really
great
to
share
this
more
widely
and
like
even
I'm
thinking
like
voice
getting
involved
here
with.
G
Maybe
you
know
over
the
next
couple
weeks
like
hey
here's,
the
plan
for
governance,
2.0
and
kind
of
we've
got
a
lot
of
content
here
to
do
so,
it
would
be
something
I
think
we
can
try
to
communicate
more
broadly.
Both
within
the
community
and
also
use
it
as
something
like
a
to
expand
outside
of
people
and
talk
about
the
general
crypto
Dao
ecosystem.
A
Things
that
they
come
we
work
up
on.
There
is
a
lot
in
the
roadmap
like
multiple
options
on
the
schemes
on
the
voting
machine.
Zero
knowledge,
zero
is
proof
to
be
added
to
the
about
the
machine
to
the
Loading
serial
knowledge.
Both
signaling
account
abstractions.
So
there
is
a
lot
that,
on
the
on
the
backlog
of
features
that
we
that
we
can
add
so
yeah.
A
This
is
no
kind
of
like
the
end
of
the
of
the
Rona.
This
is
at
the
beginning
of
the
new
structural,
new
and
smart
contract
that
we
are
going
to
have
a
new
yeah
again
like
new
structure
of
FML
contract,
where
we
are
going
to
be
able
to
work
more
freely
and
other
more
features
over
it.
A
Okay,
we
did
thanks.
Everyone
for
joining,
we
are
I.
Think
later
is
going
to
do
like
a
lot
of
post
later
again,
congratulations
to
Fede
Amidon
for
the
for
her
work
base.