►
From YouTube: DXdao Priorities Board Monthly Sync [2023-03-27]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
hello,
and
welcome
to
priorities
board
meeting
monthly
for
March
27th
I
wanted
to
oh
Wayne.
You
just
got
here.
We
just
started
I
recorded
So,
it's
okay!
Hopefully
I
will
be
good
about
getting
this.
Let
me
get
the
link
for
the
dock
that
I
prepared
started
here
and
a
new
one
here
and
then
a
new.
A
Okay,
just
over
here
where
we've
come
second
instance
of
ESP
and
DxD
inclusion,
I
really
love
the
word
instance
Sky
when
you
use
that
I
think
that's
I
like
that.
I
want
to
keep
using
that
and
then
new
learnings
and
ideas.
Next
month
voting
yeah.
We
can
kind
of
get
to
some
things
so
actually
I'm
gonna
switch.
This
I
want
to
actually
go
to
this.
The
second
instance
of
ESP
and
DHT
inclusion.
A
So
just
for
reference,
so
there
has
been
an
update
to
I
guess
the
instance
and
when
we
say
instant
sky
here,
what
we're
talking
about
is
the
number.
C
D
Yeah
real
quick
on
on
terminology
I
guess!
So,
if
you
go
back
to
the
main
page,
each
one,
every
single
one
of
those
is
his
own
instance.
So
there's
actually
12
instances
like
you
can
spin
up
right.
They
have
a
certain
amount
of
points
they
reference.
Well,
they
reference
a
list
of
number
of
points
on
users
and
then,
like
the
number
one
there
is
DX.
D
Styles
is
a
DX
dial
main
DX
style
instance
on
ESP
the
first
time
and
that
just
had
DxD
or
sorry
just
had
rep
holders
and
and
the
same
rep
voting
Powers
was
distributed
against
those
first
six
instances.
So
now
we
have
instances
7
through
12,
which
is
like
a
second
group
of
instances,
I,
guess,
right
and-
and
in
this
case
it's
factoring
in
rep
Holdings,
plus
DxD
Holdings.
D
As
long
as
you
have
more
than
10
DxD,
because
10
dxt
is
equal
to
one
voting
point
so
that
is
the
and
and
7
through
12
all
use
the
same
list
of
voting
power,
and
so
everyone
that
has
voting
power,
which
is
rep
holders
and
DxD
or
you
have
a
combination
of
the
two
you
can
vote
on.
Seven
through
ten
and
your
current
points
will
be
determined,
will
be
the
same
for
all
the
7
through
12
instances,
which
is
different
than
the
first
set
of
Rights.
A
This
now
because
I
think
here,
I
had
84
candy
fork
and
84
in
this
one
versus
127
and
I.
Think
actually,
partly
that
comes
from
one
I
did
a
rep
sync
on
gnosis
chain,
so
I
think
that
brought
it
up
to
100
and
then
I
think
the
27
is
probably
from
the
DxD
and
then,
if
I
were
like
a
random
I,
don't
know
if
someone
has
a
random
dxt
address
that
I
can
look
like
a
random.
Do.
D
You
have
roughly
270
DxD
that
I
think
it
would
count.
D
You
do
yeah,
there's
only
there's
only
three
addresses
that
in
combination
have
over
a
hundred
voting
points,
but
there's
a
lot
more
addresses
that
have
voting
points
now,
because
if
you
have
any
DxD
over
10
dxt,
you
can
vote
from
that
wallet.
Yeah
got
it.
D
And
the
DxD,
thanks
to
Ross
G
I
think
is
across,
is
for
cert
is
for
wallets
across
all
three
chains:
arbitrum
mainnet
and
gnosis
chain.
And
then
your
points
are
allocated
to
your
gnosis
Shane
address
or
that
address
I.
Guess
it
doesn't
matter
what
changes.
C
D
C
D
Is
you
know
this
is
eventually
I
mean
this
could
be
an
issue,
but
governance.
2.0
is
something
where
you're
looking
at
rep
mdxt,
where
have
some
iterations
of
that
coming
before
that?
This
is
one
of
the
first
applications
where
it
is
looking
at
rep
and
DxD
for
something
that
DX
down
needs
to
do
and
it's
not,
including
if
you're
lp'ing
and
governance
2.0
I'm,
not
even
sure
that
maybe
this
is
a
flaw,
but
governance
2.0,
like
you're
gonna,
have
to
stake
your
DxD
and
if
you're
staking
your
DxD,
it's
just
sitting
there.
A
I
think
two
things
I
think
you
can
include
the
lb
token
in
a
calculation
for
governance
2.02
as
well.
If
you
wanted
to,
it
would
just
be
able
to
like
look
to
more
than
one
erc20
and
then
two
I
also
like
think
lping.
Now
that
there
is
dstyle
providing
LP,
Arena
liquidity
itself,
I
think
there's
less
need
for
that,
but
I
I'm,
gonna,
agree
kind
of
long
term
or,
however
you're
kind
of
setting
this
up.
It
is
yeah
important
I
mean,
for
instance,
I
had.
B
A
I
was
saying
to
the
ones
that
that
count
I
had
like
25
DxD
in
hats
that
didn't
count
and
I'm
not
sure
if
it
should
or
shouldn't
but
yeah
anyway.
A
So
yeah
I
think
this
is
kind
of
cool.
It's
a
cool
like
again
just
getting
like
a
combined
score
of
different
things.
I
would
kind
of
be
interested
to
see
how
it
ranks
and
that
I
think
is
a
good
thing.
I've
got
a
previewing
how
to
get
more
signal
from
that,
so
that's
kind
of
where
we've
come.
A
Everything
on
this
page,
though,
is
just
the
same
things
we
had
before,
and
so
we
were
just
kind
of
be
voting
on
the
same
things
before,
but
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about,
maybe
how
we
can
do
things
a
little
bit
different
and
and
whatnot.
A
So
three
months
in
this
is
kind
of
my
conclusion.
There's
too
many
priorities,
not
enough
signal
right,
I!
Think
just
even
looking
at
this
and
kind
of
scrolling
this
you
know
you
just
don't
really
it's
almost
too
hard,
it's
kind
of
overflow
at
first,
so
what's
wrong,
one
I
think
hard
to
understand
all
of
the
priorities
and
how
they
interact.
A
There's
so
many
different
ones,
kind
of
on
there
that
it's
it's
hard
to
really
understand
each
one
individually
into
a
certain
extent.
Two.
It
takes
too
long
to
go
in
and
ring
like.
A
It
was
nice
to
have
people
go
and
try
this
for
an
experiment
time
at
the
beginning,
but
you
know
it's
a
pretty
significant
effort
to
be
able
to
go
and
evaluate,
assign
points
very
easily
to
you
know:
30
40,
different
ones,
I
think
that
can
be
very
cumbersome,
and
then
you
don't
end
up
having
a
lot
of
engagement
right,
because
then
it's
only
the
most
engaged
that
are
there
voting
so
I
think
and
then
you
know
if
we
wanted
to
provide
more
context
for
all
of
that.
A
That
could
be
a
way
and
that
would
require
more
work
with,
and
that
would
also
require
more
time
on
governance
or
rep
and
Deek
steel
owners
actually
go
through
the
priorities
there,
so
I
think
in
general.
We
just
need
to
figure
out
how
to
like
get
like
I
just
shrink
exactly
what
we're
trying
to
get
signal
on
rather
than
kind
of
everything.
A
The
ideal
State
I
was
thinking
this,
the
Tinder
of
governance,
not
as
a
thing
that
people
haven't
said
this
for
Tinder
for
a
while.
A
lot
of
a
lot
of
startups
were
funded
based
on
the
Tinder
of
X,
but
I
think.
A
It's
an
idea
of
how
do
you
have
something
very
quickly
that
people
are
like?
Yes,
no,
yes,
no
right,
they're
kind
of
getting
a
flash
of
it.
I
don't
know!
Maybe
it's
not
a
picture,
but
something
kind
of
very
quickly
that
you're
doing
that
you're
evaluating
and
that
that
quick
signal
is
better
than
having
one
that
is
like
fully
evaluated
from
that.
A
So
I
think
one
of
the
ways
kind
of
to
fix,
and
so
I
guess
you
know
the
key
or
being
too
many
priorities,
not
enough
signal.
So
I
think
the
key
thing
is
like:
how
do
we
have
less
priorities
that
are
kind
of
on
this
thing
and
how
do
we
get
them
there
and
how
does
that
actually
have
some
type
of
signal
there?
A
So
I
think
here
you
have
priorities,
must
have
sponsors
right
or
some
other
marker
of
the
community.
The
only
way,
you're
kind
of
on
this
sheet
in
order
to
be
able
to
vote
right
on
these
things
is
if
there
is
like
some
sponsor
that
is
getting
there
and
I'll
get
to
a
second
in
terms
of
like
what
I
think
that
could
look
like,
but
just
in
terms
of
like
you
know,
the
the
way
of
looking
this
right.
I
think
this
is
not
I.
A
Think
when
we're
doing
things
the
first
two
months,
where
you
know
Deke
style,
is
trying
to
figure
out
what
it
is
to
prioritize
or
is
I
think
we
should
try
to
be
going
forward.
More
is
like
there
are
stakeholders
or
people
in
the
community
that
they
want
to
do
something
to
get
something
prioritized,
and
so
they
have
to
bring
it
before
geek
style
and
try
to
get
it
authorized
for
something
there.
A
I
just
want
to
check
to
see
if,
like
this
sound,
there's
like
someone
doing
some
stuff
to
outside
I
guess
no
one.
It's
it's
being
blocked
out
by
my
I'm
impressed
yeah,
so
I
I
think
that's
a
subtle
difference
that
we
want
to
have
here
right
is
that
there
is
like
a
deep
style
is
not
seeking
out
to
always
figure
out
what
it
is
to
prioritize.
A
It's
more
of
like
things
are
being
brought
before
it,
and
it's
then
making
a
decision
which
I
think
puts
the
burden
of
or
the
responsibility
burden
and
responsibility
on
the
on
the
new
priorities
are
the
people
that
want
to
get
things
to
change,
so
some
proposed
changes
so
I
think,
first
and
foremost,
like
obvious
priorities,
I,
don't
think
are
needed
right,
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
get
people
to
constantly
give
signal
on
things
that
we
know
we
should
be
doing
or
things
I
think,
more
importantly,
that
we're
like
already
explicitly
promised
or
mentioned
in
a
in
the
Guild's
budget
proposal
right.
A
It's
like
okay,
I'm,
gonna
work
on
this
and
work
on
that,
and
if
it's
already
kind
of
assumed
there,
it's
not
so
much,
we
need
the
priorities
board
to
like
assert
that
maybe
there
is
something
that
kind
of
that
comes
in
terms
of
evaluating
things.
C
A
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
focus
on
the
obvious
priorities
too
much
I
think.
The
key
thing
we
want
to
do
here
is
focus
on
new
ideas
or
old
ideas
on
the
side
right
right.
So
it's
things
that
have
come
up
say
in
the
last
month
last
couple
weeks,
I
can
think
of
a
couple
I
want
to
get
to
in
a
second
that
are
hey.
These
are
some
interesting
ideas.
Should
we
insert
them
into
the
priorities
that
we
need
to
be
focusing
on
if.
C
A
Are
three
or
four
new
ideas
in
a
month?
How
do
we
actually,
like
rate
those,
how
does
a
new
idea
that
we
kind
of
bring
up?
How
do
we
get
initial
signal
on
whether
that
is
an
idea
worth
worth
pursuing
so
I
think
that's
what
we're
kind
of
looking
at
to
kind
of
shift
to,
and
you
know
the
way
I
put
it
here.
Is
you
know
this
is
something
that's
added
on
top
of,
but
not
in
replacing
the
responsibilities
and
the
goals
or
budgets
right.
A
But
the
priorities
board
is
more
meant
to
capture
like
new
things
that
come
up
during
that
time
and
a
way
of
gathering
signal
quickly
to
be
able
to
need
that
I
think
we
need
to
be
very
strict
on
like
the
number
of
priorities
that
we
can
get
on
the
board,
just
because
I
think
it
gets
too
long
if
we
have
10
15
20
things
like
that,
and
so
I
think
what
we're
we're
trying
to
do
is
more
of
like
of
the
things
that
are
five
priorities
like
how
do
we
think
people
are
going
to
allocate
them
there,
and
if
there
are
five
things
that
everything
you
know
everyone
are
really
aware
of,
then
we
can
do
that
so
I
think
I
have
here
no
more
than
five
priorities
listed
for
DX
out
and
no
more
than
three
listed
for
each
guilt.
A
C
A
Something
so
a
you
know:
Discord
person
who's
only
you
know
who
pokes
his
head
in
every
you
know
once
a
week
that
they
could
participate
in
this
very
quickly,
with
kind
of
voting
on
different
things
there,
making
it
easy
for
that.
One
of
the
ones
I
think
actually
does
a
good
job
of
this.
That
does
vote
every
month
is
ens
small
grants,
and
so
this
is
something
yeah.
They
just
said
they
have
like
this
voting
almost
every
month.
You
can
see
there's
like
41
proposals
here.
A
Quiet
voted
for
some
of
these
for
them,
but
yeah,
there's,
like
lots
of
you,
know
little
short
things
here
that
people
can
kind
of
vote
on.
So
obviously
these
are
the
individually
voting
for
these
things,
as
opposed
to
ranking
them,
but.
A
Is
like
yeah
a
model
maybe
to
think
about
there
individual
guilds?
Sorry,
this
is
a
yeah,
so
I
think
guilds
can
and
should
propose
their
own
priorities.
I
think
this
is
like
a
little
bit
different
than
what
I
was
thinking
of
before
it's
more
of
like
yeah
ideas
that
the
guild
is
wanting
to
work
on
and
prioritize
and
then
they're
looking
for
signal
and
kind
of
need.
A
I
do
think
you
need
to
have
the
ability
for
other
people
to
to
add
things
to
the
the
guilds
priority
list,
but
I
think
if
you
have
the
guild
driving
it
they're
setting
the
agenda
for
it,
then
you
really
are
like
isolating
trying
to
get
the
specific
signal
of
the
community
on
what
it's
interested
in
but
yeah
as
I
said
here
you
having
the
ability
of
another
entity
or
stakeholder
to
be
able
to
add
things
to
the
priorities
board
that
that
would
come
with
something
like
maybe
like
having
a
second
right.
A
B
A
So
like
some
ideas,
that
would
maybe
be
a
little
bit
more
conducive
I
think
to
this
new
way
of
thinking
of
it
so
I'm
thinking
of
like
I'm
thinking.
This
is
kind
of
some
swapper
things
right
here.
I
think
I,
like
a
perfect
example
like
I,
think,
there's
three
really
kind
of
exciting
things.
Maybe
that
are
going
ongoing
right
now
that
are
all
different
priorities.
A
We
just
saw
a
great
demo
on
the
the
zapping
contracts
there
from
I
think
a
cautious
his
name
and
really
kind
of
cool
things
there
in
terms
of
building
a
front
end
for
that,
there's
also
some
great
things
on
the
stackly.
It
looks
like
going
to
get
a
grant
from
Cal
swap
for
that.
Looking
at
that,
and
then
obviously
like
all
the
stuff
going
out
with
Arbor
drum
growth,
like
those
are
each
things
that
have
like
popped
up
in
the
last
month.
A
That
would
I
think
be
very
interesting
to
see
like
well.
What
are
the
ones
that
are
like
priority
between
those
and
those
I
think
are
venky
or
ones
that
swapper
Squad
is
like
already
working
on
and
focusing
on
there,
and
so
it
would
be
a
way
of
really
again
just
like
gathering
this
signal
for
that
and
in
the
same
way
here,
I
think
with
DX
go
if
you
look
at
maybe
these
are
like
the
three
things
that
they're
thinking
about
and
working
on,
to
talk
to
Ross
about
this,
maybe
it's
a
little
bit.
A
He
would.
He
would
frame.
C
A
Basically,
you
know
having
the
tally
angle,
being
able
to
put
something
being
able
to
have
a
bunch
of
dows
that
all
you
can
search
from
through
Davi,
the
key
with
that
is
basically
make
plugging
into
compound
Bravo
contract
and
having
that
integrate
into
the
Dobby
front
end
comp,
1.5
and
gov
2.0
implementation
obviously
just
saw
this
kind
of
an
update
on
this
in
the
last
two
weeks,
both
in
the
1.5
and
the
2.0
stuff.
So
that's.
A
Like
a
work
stream,
that's
already
going
on
and
then
the
Davi
Dao
setup
wazer.
This
is
something
Medusa
presented
on
a
call,
some
ideas
about
it
like
two
or
three
weeks
ago.
So
anyway,
these
would
be
like
okay,
these
are
the
three
priorities
and.
C
A
Would
be
easy
to
allocate
these
things
according
to
the
different
things
and
like,
for
instance,
I.
Think
it's
a
real,
interesting
idea
to
think
about
whether
Dobby
should
focus
on
like
this
Dow
Setup
Wizard,
which
would
really
be
trying
to
build
some
lock-in
into
the
back
end
and
the
smart
contracts
or
whether
it
should
try
to
be
getting
like
more.
B
A
Through
just
trying
to
integrate
as
many
Dows
as
possible,
some
other
ideas,
I
was
just
kind
of
like
you
know,
thinking
of
different
things
that
again
things
that
have
come
up
in
the
last
like
month,
how
you
kind
of
bring
those
ideas
there
and
you're
looking
to
get
some
signal
there
and
so
for
voice
right,
Flagship,
branding
swap
on
arbitrum.
A
Maybe
there's
some
other
things
in
terms
of
wanting
to
get
signal
here,
but
I
think
the
key
thing
is
yeah
shortening
or
limiting
figuring
out
how
to
limit
the
number
of
priorities
making
those
something
that
is
like
a
guild-driven
thing.
These
are
the
priorities
that
the
guild
itself
is
focusing
on
and
then
having
that
be
easily
voted
on,
you
know
just
kind
of
gets
into
do
we
need
to
use
the
ESP
computer
this
this
app,
you
know
or
snapshot
or
anything
like
that.
A
I'm
again,
I
think
I'm
still
open
to
all
these
ideas.
I'm
still
we're
still
trying
to
figure
out
if
this
is
something
that
makes
sense,
and
it's
worth
the
time
and
effort
and
and
that
but
I'm
open
to
looking
at
different
different
ways.
A
I
think
the
key
thing
is
the
having
having
the
combined
rep
in
DxD
I
think
is
something
that
people
are
yeah,
exploring
a
lot
right
right
now
and
I
think
that's
a
key
thing,
regardless,
whether
it's
on
Snapshot
or
an
ESP,
there
I
think
it's
a
little
bit
trickier
to
think
about
how
DX
Dow's
priority
priorities
board
overall,
like
matters
right
like
what
is
worth
trying
to
get
signal.
C
A
Think
the
guilds
are
like
a
little
bit
clearer
there
in
terms
of
their
priorities
on
on
executing
there,
but
that
yeah-
maybe
that's
something
we
can
talk
about
today,
so
yeah.
That
was
what
I
had
planned
for
here.
We
can
go
over,
maybe
some
of
the
like
what
are
the
priorities
there,
but
maybe
just
kind
of
some
any
thoughts
or
comments
on
changes
or
updates
to
this
yeah.
Maybe
these
things
right
here.
D
So
these
are
a
lot
of
changes
from
the
first
one.
In
my
mind,
the
the
way
we
tried
it,
the
first
quarter
and
the
second
quarter
like
it
only
you
only
get
any
value
to
see
if
the
priorities
change
right,
that
it's
it
doesn't
matter.
What's
on
the
priority
matters,
what
changes
from
the
first
time
you
use
it
to
the
second
time
you
use
it
now
we
have
more
information.
So
one
thing
we
change
is
now
because
people
really
thought
DxD
holders
weren't
represented
now.
D
Dxt
holders
are
on
there,
so
that
we'll
see
if
dxt
holders
vote,
but
we
can
replicate
the
way
we
did
it
the
first
time
and
see
if,
if
focus
or
priority
changes
and
I
agree
that
it's
not
an
easy,
it's
not
as
easy
for
people
to
use,
but
if
a
lot
of
people
that
use
snapshot
they
just
come
in
and
they
just
like
vote
in
like
three
minutes
on
Snapshot,
and
they
don't
actually
like
think
about
the
issues.
D
If
we
make
it
too
easy
for
like
a
hundred
people
to
just
come
vote
on
priorities,
but
they're
just
gonna,
do
it
in
like
three
minutes
in
my
mind
those
aren't
the
people
like
I
don't
really
care,
if
someone's
just
paying
attention
for
three
minutes
is
going
to
vote
on
priorities
of
DX
Dao
I,
actually
don't
care
what
their
opinion
is.
I,
don't
think
that
their
opinion
is
actually
that
valuable.
So
what
we
want
is
people
to
put
a
lot
of
thought
into
actually
the
like
thinking
about
which
of
the
priorities
are
important
spending.
D
Some
of
these
additions
are
also
good.
Maybe
people
like
gills
proposing
new
ones,
other
people
can
add
new
ones,
but
I
think
you
will
miss
out
on
some
of
the
effectiveness
of
of
the
ESP
tool.
If
you
don't
like
try
to
do
a
second
round
to
compare
it
to
the
first
round,
like
that's
my
opinion,
just
to
try
it
again,
we
could
do
an.
We
could
do
another
way
to
Signal
as
well.
D
A
Yeah,
there
definitely
is
that
continuity
advantage.
D
It
ends
up
being
exactly
the
same
as
the
first
one.
That
would
be
quite
interesting
to
know
if
it's
changed.
That
would
also
be
interesting,
and
if
we
had
more
participation,
that
would
be
also
interesting,
but
everyone
with
yeah
rep,
especially
if
you're
like
a
if
you're
a
regular
contributor
and
you
have
rep
or
you
have
DxD.
D
Yeah,
especially
since
DxD,
so
anyone
that
has
DxD
on
any
chain
can
now
at
least
as
long
as
it's
more
than
10
dxt
can
now
participate
in
this
in
the
signaling.
D
But
you
know,
look
look
at
this.
The
swapper
snapshot
that
venky
did
there's
five
thousand
wallets
like
that's
just
it's
just
like
it's
just
like
some
bot
is
literally
just
filling
it
out
and
doesn't
matter
what
it
votes
right
like
those
those
signals
on
that,
don't
matter
if
it's
4
000
Bots
right
like
that's
insane,
we
don't
want.
We
don't
care
about
those
anything
that's
under
yeah.
What
is
it
under
50
swapper
is
almost
fake
right.
C
A
B
A
Think
the
terminology
I
think
maybe
there
is
a
new
number
or
base
number
or
instance
that
includes
DxD
holders
here.
So
everyone
who
has
all
new
numbers
and
all
new
amounts
to
allocate
and
they're
the
same
yeah
ones
there,
and
this
I
think
just
got
done
last
night
or
yesterday
there.
So
you
can
see
there
are
I,
guess,
I,
think
sky
has
gone
through
and
done
one
to
all
of
them,
but
yeah
I
think
for
for
now.
A
We
definitely
wanted
to
keep
I
think
the
continuity
of
this
and
be
able
to
go
over
these
and
talk
about
them
every
month
and
figure
out
how
to
vote.
I
was
just
figuring
out.
Maybe
some
ideas
on
how
to
make
things
a
little
bit
more
wider
engaged
because
I
feel
like
this
is
a
little
bit
in
the.
C
A
But
maybe
I
guess
this
guy's
point
like
maybe.
A
A
I
am
a
believer
that
you
need
to
engage
lots
of
different
types
of
people
and
stakeholders
with
different
types
of
involvement,
so
I
think
it's
very
important
to
engage
people
in
the
weeds.
I.
Think
geeked
out
is
a
good
job
of
doing
that
in
terms
of
the
public.
B
A
You
want
to
get
in
the
weeds.
Everything
is
right
there
and
able
to
and
then
there's
several
different
levels
of
familiarity
and
so
yeah.
Maybe
this
is
when
we
want
to
stop
people
in
the
weeds
at
but
I
guess
just
at
some
point:
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
have
another
outside
layer
of
signal
just
mostly
because
it
extends
expands.
A
The
governance
space
like
I,
think
for
me,
I
think
we
I
I,
mean
I,
think
star
has
engaged
governance
and
lots
of
areas,
but
I
think
the
thing
that's
been
missing
is
we
haven't
figured
out
how
to
expand
the
governance
base,
expand
the
number
of
people
that
are
giving
signal
and
participating
in
governance
and
I
think
we
have
a
very
high
barrier
to
do
that
now
and
I.
Just
this,
maybe
is
a
way
of
lowering
that
barrier
a
little
bit.
D
D
Could
someone
who
is
deep
in
the
space
but
is
not
focus
on
DX
Dow
they're
focused
on
their
other
project
or
another
project,
the
ens
or
shapeshift?
Or
something
could
they
come,
but
they
have
swapper
token
they
probably
have
some
dxt
token.
Could
they
come
to
DX
Dao
in
this,
in
this
priorities,
board
signaling
and
bring
an
opinion
that
is
valuable,
like
should
DX
style
focus
more
on
Davi
or
more
on
carrot
or
more
on
community
outreach
should
like
should?
A
D
C
A
Maybe
you
can
engage
with
those
people
yourselves,
but
if
we
just
use
the
excuse,
they're
not
interested
I,
don't
think
that
passes.
Because
again
the
goal
is
to
expand
the
governance
base
and
if
they're
not
interested,
then
that
means
we're
not
doing
a
good
job
of
presenting
things
that
are
interested.
D
No
well
yeah,
no
I
I
continually
say
we
want
to
expand.
We
actually
want
more
people
with
more
opinions
from
more
communities,
bring
ideas
and
participating
in
VX
style
that
part
of
that
as
governments,
part
of
that's
actually
contributing
to
DX
style.
That's
expanding
the
opportunity
field
of
va
style.
D
Yeah
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
if
getting
like
the
swapper
yeah
compared
to
the
swapper
vote,
I
mean
yeah
the
legit
people
that
voted.
That's
that's
good
to
know
their
opinion
on
that.
The
Bots
I.
Guess
you
just
throw
out
well
yeah,
but
I
would
like
to
know
what
other
legit
people
in
the
space
think
DX
style
should
work
on
for
sure
right.
A
D
A
A
Right
so
this
is
one
eighth
and
then
they
also
have
another
one,
that
is,
they
have
like
a
little
bit
larger
grants
that,
like
that's
the
one
that
goes
to
like
limo,
but
this.
A
B
A
Venki
I'm
curious,
maybe
to
gather
your
thoughts.
I
know
that
you've
had
I
think
some
good
insight
into
this
any
any
ideas
on
on
how
to
improve
things
going
forward.
E
I
mean
we
cannot
decide
from
what
communities
is.
Maybe
there
has
to
be
like
like
how
what
Skype
means
is
like?
How
would
anybody
from
outside
the
community
know
what
is
happening
in
and
out
of
the
product
guilds
right,
because
the
struggles
that
we
go
through?
It's
not
nobody
has
a
clue
sitting
voluntary
I
mean
even
Ross
asked
a
lot
of
questions
in
the
Forum,
but
he
doesn't
understand
the
real
problems.
E
A
Foreign
yeah,
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
actually
in
this
I
was
thinking
that
this
does
need
to
be
like
Guild,
driven
right.
This
is
not
as
much
people
saying
you
should
work
on
this
Guild.
It's
more
of
the
guild
saying
this
is
what
we're
working
on.
This
is
what
we're
going
to
prioritize
and
then
you're
kind
of
asking
for
validation
and
I.
Think
that's
kind
of
the
way
I
think
is
as
strongly
governance.
Is
your
life
you're.
A
And
that
requires
you
know
less
overhead
to
evaluate
it's.
C
A
B
B
A
This
is
why
you
get.
Maybe
you
explain
that
so
people
can
have
this
at
the
half
your
budget
they're
aware
of
these
things,
but
like
we
need
to
there's
working
in
conjunction
with
things
where
it's
not
just
the
guilds
executing
it
needs
to
have
because
I
mean
the
point
of
this
is
like
outside
perspective
or
other
perspective
is
very
helpful
right.
This
is
why
you
have
independent
boards.
This
is
why
you
have
other
you
don't
become
siled
in
people
executing
on
things
is
because
it's
very
helpful
to
have
that
that
input
so.
E
When
you
mentioned
that
they
mentioned
that
you
know,
we
have
independent
boards
in
the
company
and
the
boards
are.
You
know,
people
that
has
this
experience,
but
then,
when
we
say
that
the
community
has
no
understanding
of
what
the
real
issues
are,
I
mean:
what
level
should
we
go
to
communicate
these
real
issues
right
and
then
I
would
probably
have
to
give
this
information
out
every
day
or
every
hour
on
what
these
real
issues
are.
Yeah.
A
I
guess
when
we
think
of
the
community,
though,
like
I,
think
we're
thinking
of
people
like
on
this
call
right
and
like
I,
think
I'm
pretty
dialed
in
into
what's
going
on
into
swapper
right,
yeah
I
think
it
would
be
a
good
signal
to
figure
out
people
on
this
call
like
how
would
you
rate
these
three
things
right
and
I?
Guess,
like
the
people
that
vote
in
the
Excel
governments
are
pretty
informed.
D
Yeah,
but
we're
talking
about
how
to
expand
it,
so
I
think
we
have
to
drill
down.
Maybe
so
the
swapper
snapshot
vote
on
whether
or
not
to
do
the
campaigns
is
actually
interesting,
like
let's
say,
there's
40
swapper
token
holders
on
that
or
50
that
actually
voted
on
that
on
that
snapshot,
Snapchat's
easy,
those
are
swap,
engage,
swapper
holders,
they
hold
swapper
token,
and
they
feel,
like
those
swapper
token,
holders
should
feel
like
they
own
and
control
what
happens
with
swapper.
D
The
swapper
Guild
should
get
more
of
his
direction
from
swapper
token
holders
and
not
from
rep
holders
and
DxD
holders
like
the
like
I
would
think
that
all
the
people
that
voted
on
this
swapper
snapshot
in
the
last
two
days
should
signal
what
the
swapper
guild
should
be
working
on
between
stackly
zapping,
arbitrum
growth
and
other
swapper
initiatives.
So
maybe
we're
asking
the
wrong
audience
and
it
depends
on
the
guild-
depends
on
the
product
depends
on
those
things
right.
D
Like
with
the
the
biggest
issue
right
now
with
and
we've
seen,
some
comments
in
the
form
and
stuff
is
like
swapper.
The
product
has
this
token,
but
we've
never
been
able
to
like
turn
over
the
decision
making
and
the
governance
to
that
token,
yet,
and
and
the
people
that
hold
that
token
and
have
been
buying
that
token
and
farming
that
token
and
have
the
governance
token
feel
like
they're
not
have
no
power
at
all.
Almost
so
we
need
to
like
get
their
opinion
more
yeah.
D
D
We
we
really
I
mean
we
really
need
to
like
turn
over
decision
making
on
what
to
do
with
the
ARB
token
drop
and
maybe
the
direction
of
swapper
and
these
different
initiatives
within
swapper
that
are
all
flowing
and
gonna
deliver
value
to
swapper
token,
that
decisions
kind
of
need
to
be
made
by
the
swapper
token
holders,
given
that
we
launched
the
token
in
DX
gov,
there's
no
separate
token
in
carrot,
there's
no
separate
token.
That's
the
difference.
I
guess.
D
C
A
It's
your
casual
swap
or
holder
you're,
trying
to
end
with
and
I
I
think
it
does.
I
like
the
idea
of
like
going
after
the
people
that
voted
on
the
that's
like.
Oh
you're,
like
engaged,
you're,
curious,
you're
kind
of
there
and
I
think
we
do
need
to
figure
out
like
how
do
we
build
momentum
for
this
that
it's
not
so
much
everything's
going
to
be
created
at
first,
and
we
know
who
is
the
way
to
kind
of
expand
the
governance
system
and
power.
But
it's
more
of
like
identifying
doing
something.
A
Identifying
groups
or
ways
that
are
are
good
for
building
that
governance
structure
and
system
and
then
like
re-uh,
going
in
more
on
them
doubling
down
on
them
or
or
doing
something
similar.
There.
D
Yeah
and
since
swapper
token
holders
like
the
tool
that
they
are
using
the
only
tool,
they
know
the
only
tool
they're,
that's
common
in
that
space
is
Snapshot.
Should
we
could
take
the
eight
main
possible
priorities
for
swapper,
Guild
or
swapper?
Will
swapper
Dow?
D
Let's
say:
let's
call
it
swapper
Dow
and
like
put
those
on
snapshot,
and
you
can
do
a
ranked
I
think
you
can
do
ranked
on
Snapshot,
like
that'd,
be
worth
doing
that
in
addition
to
this
thing,
because
right
now
we're
well
right
now
we're
not
including
swapper
token
holders
at
all.
This
is
a
huge
problem,
so
we
should
do
a
snapshot.
If
that's
where
they're
all
voting,
then
let's
do
a
snapshot
for
swapper
token
holders.
C
D
I,
guess,
and
and
and
like
every
decision
swapper
makes
let's
say
once
a
week.
There
was
a
snapshot
with
that.
The
most
important
decisions
of
that
week
for
swapper
Dao.
Let's
start
calling
it
swapper
dial
like
that's
the
only
way
they
can
voice
their
opinion
right
now
is
through
snapshot
because
we
don't
have
a
mechanism,
another
mechanism,
but
like
we.
What
if
once
a
week,
there
was
a
snapshot
where
swapper
token
holders
that
regular
thing
the
regular
in
this
is
like
the
thing
that
keeps
you
coming
back
to
gets.
D
People
more
engaged
turns
them
from
passive
swapper
token
holder
to
oh,
my
God
I
see
value
coming
to
swapper.
Now,
if
I
put,
if
I,
vote
more
and
push
more
good
ideas
and
I
start
contributing
to
swapper
and
I
start
sharing
swapper
with
the
world
and
tell
everyone
why
you
should
use
swapper
front-end
instead
of
instead
of
uniswap
front
end,
that
will
help
swapper
and,
as
a
swapper
token
holder,
I'll
win
with
swapper.
A
Cool
cool,
so
I
guess
kind
of
three
takeaways
here
as
we
you
know
one.
We
have
this
new
instance
that
includes
dxt
holders
and
we
wanna.
We
just
have
that
theirs.
We
want
to
figure
out
how
we
can
get
just
run.
It.
A
See
if
there's
some
continuity
there
then
so
that's
maybe
something
we
do
this
week
and
then
two
I
think
there's
an
opportunity
on
swapper
specifically
like
how
can
we
probably
using
snapshot
like
how
can
we
engage
something
else
this
month
as
a
way
to
build
that
engaged
Community?
A
A
I
think
three
is
how
to
figure
out
I
guess
for
next
month,
they're
going
forward.
Where
do
we
want
to
end
up
in
terms
of
structure
and
how
things
are
are
working
there
and
so
presented
some
some
ideas
here
and
then
maybe
we'll
have
yeah
some
different
ones
next
month.
In
addition
to
having
more
signal
on
how
the
second
instance
went
with
the
including
dxt
holders
and
then
two
on
swapper
and
seeing
if
there's
any
momentum
from
engaging
that
that
Community
again.
D
Cool
yeah
for
this,
for
the
snapshot
for
swapper
I,
don't
know
what
snapshot's
capable
of,
but
is
it
like?
Is
it
more
like
as
a
swapper
token
holder?
Here
are
eight
things?
What
do
you
think
the
most
important
thing
for
swapper
is
or
what
do
you
think
the
swapper
guilds
should
work
on,
or
is
that
possible
to
come
up
with
eight
things
that
you
just
rank?
Basically,.
D
E
I
mean
I
mean
I
can
list
eight
things,
but
then,
if
the
token
holders
wanted
to
wanted
us
to
work
on
zapper,
then
it's
like
a
different
set
of
it's
like
a
different
set
of
skills.
That
I
would
need,
if
it
is
on
stack,
lead,
is
at
a
different
set
of
skills.
If
it
is
on
Armature
growth,
it
is
different
set
of
skills,
so
so
yeah
I
mean
if,
if.
E
I,
don't
I
don't
think
swapper
is
in
a
state
where
people
could
just
come
in
and
then
signal
this.
It's
because
when
they
signal
it,
I
think
I
think
the
guild
is
not
structured
in
that
way
like
this
is
just
a
product
build
and
if
let's
say
that
you
know,
if
we
want
arbitrary
growth,
then
we
need
to
go
to
voice
and
then
say
that
yeah.
This
is
what
you
need
to
sell
on.
This
is
what
DX
down
need
to
spend
some
effort
on
on
sales
and
marketing
right.
A
I,
don't
think
this
is
for
this.
That's
because
it's
swapper
token
holders
don't
right.
That's
like
a
different
governance
structure
than
The
swapper,
Guild
right
and
so
I.
Don't
I
I
kind
of
agree
with
you
that
if
they
didn't
say
our
return
growth,
then
that
is
something
that
would
not
apply
to
the
swapper
guild
but
I.
Don't
think
I
think
that
is
still
good
signal
and
is
not
necessary
that
should
be
incumbent
upon.
You
is
more
of
a
signal
from
swapper
holders
on
how
to
on
what
should
should
be
done.
C
E
What
the
holders
are
thinking,
so
we
could
definitely
give
it
a
try
and
then
see.
I
have
I
have
80
items,
so
I
have
to
I
have
to
look
at
top
eight,
just
which
is
okay.
C
A
Cool
cool
awesome
I'll
write
up
some
of
this
and
post
this
in
the
Forum
kind
of
a
summary
and
then
Sky.
Maybe
we
can
think
about
doing
a
little
Ping
On,
the
new
ESP
and
sometime
this
week,
maybe
giving
a
little
bit
of
explanation,
but
everyone
and
everyone
can
go
through
and
do
the
vote
and
then
yeah
we'll
think
about
what
we
can
do
on
swapper
for
this
month
in
terms
of
engaging.
A
Awesome
yeah,
that
was
it
does
anyone
else
have
any
other.