►
From YouTube: DXdao WeeklyMeeting #17 [2020-10-22]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
The
major
change
is
how
users
create
a
market,
so
that
was
redesigned
to
kind
of
fix.
A
few
flaws
with
the
previous
designs,
for
example,
if
if
the
user
added
a
few
outcomes
to
change
the
probability
they
needed
to
remove
the
whole
item
and
then
re-edit
it
by
typing
everything
in
again
that
was
changed.
So
once
someone
is
adding
an
outcome,
they
can
actually
edit
the
outcome,
description
and
the
probability
on
the
fly.
B
So
we
make
sure
that
it
is
like
absolutely
clear
what
the
user
put
in
as
a
closing
closing
date
and
another
huge
fix
for
for
that
version
was
that
we
we
had
a
bug
where,
if
a
user
has
two
outcomes
of
one
market,
there
was
a
bug
in
the
redeem
function
and
that's
something
we
fixed
so
glad
that
we
find
those
bugs
before
omens
getting
used
by
millions
of
users.
So
that's
that's
great
and
we
have
a
lot
of
in
the
pipeline.
B
B
A
A
Thoughts,
great
okay,
let's
we'll
move
on
to.
Oh,
we
have
like
a
live
discussion
on
dx12
playing
keybase,
we'll
get
to
that
when
we
get
to
dx
walk,
but
on
on
mesa
side,
there's
a
new
release,
there's
a
new
and
a
new
proposal.
That
is,
I
think,
posted
now,
and
everybody
should
go
and
check
that
out
and
vote
on
it
if
they
have
the
time.
A
Two
two
things
to
note
one
is
that
the
the
balances
are
now
sorting
alphabetically
and
the
big
thing
is
x,
die
support,
so
you'll
be
actually
be
able
to
go
through
mesa.e,
just
switch
your
network
to
xdi
and
be
able
to
trade
and
do
stuff
on
next
night
cool.
I
don't
know
how
much
liquidity
there
is
at
this
point,
I'm
not
supposed
to
call
on
x
time,
but
it's
still
pretty
awesome
that
we're
starting
to
establish
our
products
on
on
next
slide
chain.
A
D
C
Yeah,
so
on
monday,
kristoff
from
eat
the
risk
he
he
spoke
during
the
business
development
call
about
ratifying
the
dip
token
listing
on
mesa
and
it
has
since
as
of
like
today.
I
think
so
that's
a
new
listing
and
it's
all,
because
a
guy
from
their
community
showed
up
talked
to
the
dao
and
you
know
gave
as
much
information
as
possible
answered
questions
and
then
the
dow
ratified
it.
C
A
F
Yeah,
like
I
share
on
keyways,
we
finally
merged
the
next
minor
release
of
the
x-fab
of
the
x-application
that
was
done
after
we
detailed
it.
I
think
what
two
weeks
ago
that
we
received
all
its
results
from
the
dx
subcore
and
pedifree
contracts,
so
we
did
the
changes.
How
fixes
that
we
need
to
do
on
those
blockchain?
F
We
can
call
it
like
blockchain
libraries,
that's
the
ones
that
hold
the
smart
contracts,
then
federico
did
a
lot
of
work,
integrating
the
token
list
feature
and
also
merging
and
syncing
our
code
with
the
latest
code
changes
from
uni
swap
and
yeah.
After
that
we
updated
the
sdk.
There
is
a
javascript
library
that
we
used
to
connect
our
decentralized
application
with
smart
contracts
and
added
the
token
list,
and
they
made
it
made
the
deployment
on
rinkeby.
A
And
yeah
that's
great
and
on
the
the
governance,
integration
side,
niko's,
full
steam
ahead
on
the
relayer
and
hoping
to
wrap
that
up
this
week,
and
that
would
go
into
audit
next
week
and
you
know
there's
still
development
going
on.
You
know,
in
collaboration
with
downstack,
on
how
that
scheme
is
going
to
work
and
how
the
front
end
is
going
going
to
work
yeah.
Anything
anything
else
updates
that
I
don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
add
anything
in
there.
A
D
A
A
A
It's
been
off
the
market,
it's
from
the
pre
mint,
it's
just
sitting
in
our
treasury,
and
so,
if
dx
dow
provides
liquidity
using
that
dxd
at
the
current
market
price,
it's
equivalent
to
the
dx
style
being
a
market
maker
at
you
know
around
the
current
market
price,
which
is
the
same
as
selling
more
dxd
below
the
bonding
curve
price
right.
So
I
think
it's
a
very
valid
point,
something
we
should
consider
when
we're
thinking
about
adding
liquidity
to
the
dx1
pair.
Does
that
make
sense.
B
A
F
Yeah
also
also
what
size
of
the
of
the
currents
or
the
current
dxe
supply
we
are
like,
injecting
in
the
market
right
because,
for
example,
if
we
have
25
million
dollars
of
liquidity
of
dxe
or
dxd
circulating-
and
you
are-
I
know,
25
thousand
dollars
is
like
is
isn't
I
I
don't
know
if
I
open
insignificant,
but
it's
a
very
low
amount
like
it
won't.
It
won't
affect
the
price
at
all.
F
G
G
F
Yeah,
sorry,
yeah.
Let
me
finish:
that's
a
short
thing.
One
thing
that
we
can
do
is
also
burn
the
equal
amount
of
dxd
that
we
are
injecting
in
the
market.
That
again,
I
think
they
are
going
to
be
super
low,
and
if
the
issue
here
is
that
people
is
being
able
to
acquire
dxd
at
the
cheaper
price,
we
cannot
stop.
That,
like
there
is
going
to
be
an
automated
market
maker
running
on
uni
swap
all
the
time.
So
the.
F
A
Idea
another
idea,
though
I
mean
there's
different
ways.
We
can
approach
this
right
like
what
is
the
actual
goal
here.
Is
it
simply
to
be
to
establish
a
deep
market
of
dxd
on
dx,
swap
like
there's
other
ways
I
mean
another
way
to
approach
it.
That
is
maybe
better
for
existing
dxd
holders
would
be
to
do
like
a
liquidity
incentive
program
to
get
the
market
to
be
deep.
So,
basically,
instead
of
leveraging
the
treasury
to
put
the
market,
we
could
like
incentivize
the
existing
dxt
to
go
there.
B
B
Yeah
20
10.
yeah.
We
should
think
about
a
proper
fee
because
that's
like
that's
yeah
like
why
should
we
set
a
proper
fee
for
that
and
like
actually
do
both
like
provide
liquidity
from
the
treasury
set
a
proper
fee
because
that's
like
that's
like
very
liquid
dxd
to
ease
and
they
should
pay
a
premium
for
that,
and,
additionally,
do
liquidity
mining
for
dxd
holders,
which
also
earn
like
that
high
amount
of
fees
or
like
do
you
guys
know
what
I
mean
like
to
actually
do
both?
D
H
H
A
H
A
B
A
Yeah,
I
think
it's
a
matter
of
balance
here.
Obviously
we'll
continue
this
discussion.
I
just
wanted
to
touch
on
it
because
it
was
like
there
seemed
to
be
a
little
confusion
in
the
dx
swap
key
based
channel
yeah.
I
mean,
I
think,
there's
there's
kind
of
maybe
goals
that
are
a
little
bit
at
odds.
You
know
at
the
current
market
price,
but
you
know
we
can
figure
out
the
appropriate
balance
right.
D
F
Yeah,
I
need
to
put
the
topic
on
dow
talk
also
to
I
deployed
the
extras
on
rinkevi,
so
you
can
also
you
you
will
be
able
to
get
ether
through
the
through
the
cure
or
wrinkle
by
two,
and
I
have
to
deploy
the
instructions
to
get
the
erc20
tokens
windows,
chinos
c
news,
or
all
that
we
are
named
tokens
how
to
get
it
on
yeah.
You
can
you
can
test
them.
A
A
H
A
F
G
A
D
So
the
well
related
to
rails,
but
the
and
this
idea
was
thrown
around
in
the
in
the
key
base.
It
would
be
cool
the
the
erc20
token
wrapper
for
omen.
Conditional
market
tokens
exists,
so
you
saw
that
gnosis
put
some
on
uniswap,
but
it
would
be
cool
to
take
a
market,
maybe
one
that's
relevant
to
dx,
dow
or
relevant
to
rails
or
something
or
relevant
to
relevant
to
loop
ring
and
actually
wrap
those
tokens
and
put
those
tokens
on
on
loop
ring.
D
D
But
if
you
create
a
rails
account,
we
send
you
one
of
these
incentive
based
wrap
tokens,
which
is
actually
a
wrapped
omen
token,
and
we
actually
send
it
out
to
a
bunch
of
you
know
the
top
like
50
rails
addresses
or
something
and
then,
if
some
event
happens,
it
becomes
worth
three
times
as
much
money.
Then
it
can
be
redeemed
for
that
amount
of
money
like
so
it's
like
a
marketing,
but
it's
a
it's
a
it's.
B
Actually,
like
I,
I
started
to
think
about
it
yesterday,
but
if
we
it's
a
it's
a
huge
decision
for
oman
to
decide
on
what
what
kind
of
layer
two
or
side
chain
it
is
going
to
be.
Extire
is
like
such
a
riskless
bet
for
us,
and
it's
like
we
actually
not.
We
don't
need
to
do
any
heavy
lifting
it's
just
like
redeploying
stuff
connecting
stuff
together
and
then
it's
there
and
that's
like
that's
why
I
was
totally
pro
extra,
but
lubricant
is
like
a
huge
bet
right.
D
Yeah,
but
no,
but
there
are.
These
are
two
totally
separate
things,
because
the
use
of
omen
makes
sense
on
x-die
and
then
eventually,
maybe
on
optimism,
optimistic
roll-ups
or
something,
but
for
sending
around
wrapped
omen
tokens
as
erc-20s
right
now.
The
only
place
you're
seeing
those
is
in
in
uniswap,
where
you
can
interact
with
them
but
rails,
like
people
aren't
sending
e
to
it,
we're
not
sending
each
to
each
other,
we're
not
sending
dxd
to
each
other,
but
we
might
send
wrapped
omen
tokens
to
each
other,
like
that
makes
more
sense.
So
so.
D
And,
and
what
will
be
cool
is
if
the
market
we
can
come
up
with
what
that
market
would
be,
but
if
you
make
it
an
interesting
market,
the
minute
someone
gets
that
token
they're
like
oh.
If
that
token
only
pays
out,
if
there's
ten
thousand
rails
users,
then
everyone
who
has
that
token
is
going
to
tell
all
their
friends
to
get
on
rails,
because
then
the
token's
going
to
pay
out.
D
A
B
C
D
I
think
they
were
no
no,
like
I'm
pretty
sure
everyone
will
poly
market
and
us,
and
everyone
like
we
are
using
we're
going
to
use
the
omen
conditional.
Sorry,
the
conditional
token
framework
on
mainnet
to
create
any
of
these
markets
and
tokens.
Once
you
have
those
tokens,
you
can
do
lots
of
things
on
layer,
2
of
them
exactly
it.
H
H
C
H
Right-
and
I
just
I
don't
think,
that's
as
my
read-
is
that
that's
not
a
sustainable
like
structure,
because
who
is
providing
liquidity
on
those
trump
and
or
trump
yes
or
trump.
No
tokens,
and
obviously
this
is
kind
of
where
gnosis
comes
into
play,
so
the
what
polymark
is
doing
and
in
a
way
we're
trying
to
do.
It
is
subsidize
these
things
and
own
the
user
experience
and
so.
B
B
But,
let's
see
like
I'm
super
curious
how
they
actually
will
make
money
and,
like
even
more
I'm
super
curious
how
they
will
protect
themselves
legally
against,
like
a
lot
of
a
variety
of
attack
vectors
from
from
the
legal
side,
so
I'm
very
surprised
to
see
that
they
actually
got
funded
so
much
money,
it's
good
for
the
prediction
market
space.
So,
let's
see
what
they
come
up
with.
E
Right
geronimo,
I'm
happy
you
bring
up
that
regulatory
thing
and
just
a
quick
note
on
on
all
this
first
of
all
sky.
That
idea
is
really
cool
and
it's
like
decoupled
from
actually
prediction
market
stuff
on
layer,
two
which
are
saying
it's.
I
think
my
understanding
from
what
you
said
is
some
prediction
market
with
an
outcome
that
is
like
gameable
or
that
we're
nudging
people
to
affect
the
outcome
get
on
rails
and
the
tokens
you
get
you
know
will
be
worth
more,
so
they
don't
need
to
do
anything
fancy.
E
They
just
need
to
get
on
rails
and
if
we
know
that
any
account
after
66.50,
like
6650,
accounts
exist
today,
then
we
put
out
this
program
all
accounts
that
enter
looping
zk
roll
up
or
that
enter
like
the
rails
code
or,
like.
I
don't
think
we
have
the
like
when
maybe
in
federico,
when
we
could
get
that
code
up
there,
then
we
issue
them
one
of
these
outcome
tokens
and
then,
if
we
get
to
the
10
000
mark
it
it
pays
off.
Is
that
what
you're
talking
about.
E
Yes,
okay,
so
I
think
I
think
that's
that's
really
clever,
I'm
down
for
something
like
that
and
then
the
next
point
that
was
just
wrapping
the
the
outcome,
tokens
and
putting
them
on
looping.
We
could
do
that
right
now.
We
could
have.
We
could
have
done
that
six
months
ago,
right
like
that,
is
very
feasible.
It's
the
new
market
creation,
as
you
guys
said
that
that
cannot
be
done.
We
could
trade
on
an
order
book
very
fast
and
cheap
and
professionally
and
have
professional
market
makers.
E
Make
markets
today
on
loop
rings
order
books
on
layer,
two.
The
reason
that
we
don't-
and
this
goes
for
for
omen
and
gnosis
condition
like
just
in
general
and
also
for
auger,
like
who
I
alluded
to-
we
had
conversations
with
a
while
back
they
re
when
they,
you
know
relaunched
and
gas
prices
coincided
with
that
like
through
the
roof.
They
were
really
interested
in
using
loop
ring,
but
the
reason
we
didn't
you
know
materialize,
it
is
the
regulatory
risk.
E
Our
operator
is
a
centralized
thing
and
we
weren't
comfortable
running
bets
or
whatever
these
things
are
and
like
we
weren't,
we
couldn't
do
that.
So
that's
like,
I
would
love
to
be
able
to
put
omen's
outcomes
like
the
wrapped
outcomes
on
loopring.io
right
now
or
a
separate
ui
called
you
know,
fastpredictions.com
like
whatever,
which
just
has
maybe
a
select
few
of
the
most
liquid
ones.
The
big
thing
is
the
regulatory
concern
here
which,
as
a
single
operator,
we
cannot
do.
This
goes
back
to
the
question
of
last
week.
E
We
need
the
dx
dow
to
be
able
to
run
the
off
chain
relayer
the
operator.
So
we
never
have
these
these
words.
But
that's
the
thing
like.
I
really
saw
this
opportunity
like
pass
us
by
where
we
had
interest
from
a
lot
of
things,
but
we
just
were
prudent
and
we
didn't
feel
comfortable.
We
didn't
there's
two
things:
putting
it
on
the
loopering.I
dot,
io,
ui,
okay,
but
that's
easy.
Someone
could
just
fork
it
get
rid
of
every
trading
pair
and
just
have
trump
mark
it.
You
could
call,
it
could
be
called
trump.
E
You
know
trumpbet.com
and
it's
one
single
order
book.
So
then
they're
running
the
ui
and
we
don't
have
that
worry,
but
we're
still
running
the
operator.
We
are
matching
the
stuff
and
doing
it.
Then
the
question
is:
could
we
provide
just?
Could
we
license
the
relay
or
re-layer
as
a
surface,
which
is
something
we
want
to
do,
but
even
that
is
kind
of
risky
we
have
to
like
upkeep
it.
E
I
hope
that
what
you
mentioned
sky
is
actually
very
easy,
and
not
like
a
regulatory
gray
area,
saying
if
we're
even
allowing
like
the
shuttling
of
an
outcome
token
on
rails,
not
like
trading
that
market,
but
even
just
like
push
putting
that
token
there
and
then
moving
it
among
people.
I
really
it's
just
such
a
gray
area
like
as
jeronimo
was
like
I'm
just
so
yeah
like
and
anyway,
that
that's
that
those
are
all
the
considerations
from
this
end.
D
E
Yeah,
it's
it's
a
really
informal,
hey!
The
community
is
demanding
this.
Let's
do
it
we're
also
a
bit
dragging
our
feet
because
there's
only
256
token
slots
in
the
current
merkle
tree,
but
whatever
forget
about
that
in
a
month
there's
going
to
be
65
000
in
in
in
version
3.6
token
limit
won't
be
an
issue
for
for
several
years,
so
we
definitely
want
to
outsource
the
curation
of
it
like
we
don't
want
to
be
handling
it.
E
We
can
we
can
hand
it
over
to
lrc
holders
like
it's
really
undefined
and
the
dx
dow
is
actually
going
to
be
instrumental
in
helping
us
define
this,
but
maybe
it's
lrc.
Maybe
it's
just
dx
dao
that
controls
that
list.
But
the
thing
is
l2.
It's
it's
a
bit
difficult.
We
can't
just
hand
over
control
because,
let's
say
the
dx
data
wanted
to
hurt
us
or
whoever
these
curators
were.
They
could
allow
the
passing
of
a
token.
E
That's
like
deflationary
that
messes
with
a
layer,
two
environment
where,
like
you,
know,
gets
burned
and
then
the
balances
don't
match
like
there's
some
things
that
we
just
can't
allow.
So,
let's
say
the
community,
either
unwittingly
or
maliciously
wants
to
put
in
a
token
that
would
like
self-destruct
onto
the
roll-up
and
hurt
users
like
something
else
gets
drained.
I
don't
know
all
the
attack
vectors.
We
still
need
like
a
final
eye
like
our
cto
or
something
that
says.
Yes,
this
will
not
blow
up
the
entire
system.
So
thank
you,
community
curators
this
past.
E
A
All
right
just
to
I
guess,
move
move
things
along
here
on
the
on
the
governance
side
of
things
kind
of
like
the
last
product
update.
There
is
still
you
know
the
testing
for
the
erc20
guild,
which
can
lead
to
a
a
dxd
guild,
basically
a
voting
interface
for
dxd
to
have
some
stake
in
wrap
and
that's
being
completed
this
week.
A
A
G
G
We
went
back,
but
one
kind
of
like
unpredicted
thing
that
happened
is,
is
kind
of
like
a
more
involvement
of
some
of
dowstak
guys
in
the
security
of
the
exam,
and
I
think-
and
I
hope
this
will
create
a
sort
of
security,
working
group
or
security
strategy
working
group
for
the
exile
and
yeah.
That's
just
that
so
something
good
that
came
out
of
all
this
backwards
and
forwards.
A
Yeah
and
on
the
backwards
and
forwards
thing,
there
was
a
an
audit
of
the
multi-call
scheme
which
was
completed,
but
then
there
was
another
iteration
on
this
multi-call
scheme
to
try
to
add
a
little
more
flexibility.
But
that's
where
we
kind
of
got
a
little
bit
back
and
forth
because
you
know
when
that
iteration
got
audited.
There
was
some
pushback
from
the
auditor
that
hey
this
sort
of
it
doesn't
work
the
way
you
want
it
to
work,
so
we're
still
trying
to
kind
of
figure
out
how
to
make
the
the
multi-scheme.
A
A
On
on
the
security
side,
we
don't
talk
a
lot
about
it
on
the
the
weekly
calls,
but
there
is
a
bunch
of
stuff
going
on
and
I
think
we'll
probably
be
trying
to
take
a
deeper
look
at
some
of
this
stuff
and
making
sure
that
things
are.
You
know
well
covered
buttoned
up
everything.
You
know
we're
thinking
of
different
angles.
A
A
Yeah
etherisk
is
super
cool
awesome
project.
Obviously,
insurance
is
kind
of
a
hot
topic
with
d5
and
nexus
mutual
has
kind
of
dominated
that.
But
etherisk
has
it's
been
around
for
a
long
time
to
be
cool
to
see
what
they
what
they
do.
Chris,
you
wanna
cover
the
governance
call.
I
think
there
was
some
important
stuff
as
as
usual.
H
Next
second
talked
about
xdi
xdxtao
or
some
other
name
that
we're
still
coming
to
so
a
lot
of
discussion
on
that
skye's
got
a
working
document
that
he's
prepared
to
kind
of
go
over
some
of
the
things
that
we
can
do
on
the
xdi
dx
style
base.
I
think
figuring
out
some
of
the
the
I
guess
figuring
out,
some
of
like
the
immediate
marketing
ideas
or
competition
schemes
or
things
that
we
can
use
for
xdi
t
style.
H
And
then
the
third
thing
we
discussed
was
the
governance
2.0
working
group
proposal,
which
I
sent
to
submitted
as
a
proposal
last
night,
and
then
I'm
crafting
email
and
we'll
send
around
to
people
there.
I'm
trying
to
move
forward
with
that.
The
proposal
I
thought
I
boosted
it,
but
it
is
still
not
even
gone
to
pending
boosting
and
I
also
have
a
had
the
same
thing
happening
in
x
died.
H
So
I
don't
know
if
I'm
capable
of
boosting
proposals
very
well
but
yeah
that
that,
as
I
said,
that
proposal
started
hopefully
we'll
get
past
the
end
of
next
week
and
then
hopefully
the
beginning
of
the
following
week.
We'll
start
we'll
start
that
governance
2.0
working
group,
which
should
be
around
six
to
eight
weeks
and,
of
course,
just
some
that's
to
kind
of
address
some
of
the
long
standing.
Maybe
structural
sustainability,
governance,
sustainability
issues,
particularly
around
kind
of
the
alignment
of
txd
and
rep
long
term.
A
Yeah,
the
governance
2.0
working
group,
you
know
kind
of
as
like
one
of
the
points
in
the
five-point
plan
is,
is
really
kind
of
this
important
kind
of
long-term
existential.
You
know
matter,
and
it's
going
to
be
completely
open.
That
fray,
for
all
the
calls
will
be
open
for
people
to
see
and
follow,
and
you
know.
A
H
Yeah
and
the
way
that
I
think
of
like
the
working
group-
and
I
know-
we've
talked
about
this
security-
one
bonding
curve
a
lot
a
lot
of
different.
You
know
ideas.
I
think
it's
all
about
creating
momentum
right.
So
it's
not
so
much
about
like
carving
off
something
and
everyone
leaving
and
going
to
work
on
a
problem
and
then
coming
back
to
report
the
community.
H
A
A
A
H
Just
to
give
a
quick
it's
about
reputation
based
governance,
which
I
really
think
as
we
kind
of
get
further
along
in
building
out
governance
processes
and
just
having
different
interactions.
I
really
think
the
reputation
based
governance
is
one
of
the
huge
things
that
distinguishes
dx
dow
from
other
projects
in
the
space,
and
I
think
that's
something
we
should
lean
into
and
try
to
push
that
narrative
throughout
the
ecosystem.