►
From YouTube: DXdao Priorities Board Monthly Sync [2023-02-21]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
We
will
I'm
going
to
share
the
link
to
the
doc
that
I
created
here
and
then
I'm
going
to
just
share
my
screen
here.
I
never
am
happy
with
the
way
to
share
a
screen
for
a
presentation
because
I
feel
like
it
should
be
like
bigger.
A
Okay,
cool
so
just
kind
of
quick
agenda,
different
things
to
discuss
so
one
just
like
a
recap
of
what
the
priority
report
is
where
we're
at
and
and
that
two
initial
learnings
of
the
process.
So
this
is
the
second
month
and
so
kind
of
figuring
out
what
our
initial
reactions
and
then
three.
B
A
Over
the
results
from
this
initial
round,
and
so
looking
at
the
extent
I
was
priorities
boards
and
then
looking
individually
at
the
guild
priority,
support
and
kind
of
just
you.
C
A
Running
through
what
the
cell
itself
means
and
then
yeah,
dxt,
holder
and
other
Outreach
and
I
kind
of
one,
also
including
that
just
like
other
improvements
to
either
the
ESP
app
or
just
the
process
overall
And
discussing
that
there
yeah.
So
what
is
the
priorities
board?
So
the
restructuring
phase
two
proposal
authorize
the
creation
of
priorities
board
to
gather
more
signal
from
the
extout
governance
and
transparency
on
the
community's
priorities.
We
had
the
first
meeting.
A
And
that's
when
we
debuted
the
extensible,
signaling,
primitive
or
ESP
app
that
was
built
by
Luis
or
Louis,
I
can't
remember,
which
is
really
cool
and
we
kind
of
debuted
that
whenever
some
initial
priorities
of
that
and
then
since
then
we
had
yeah,
we
kind
of
ran
through
this.
We
have
now
there's.
If
you
look
at
them,
there's
19
different
priorities.
C
A
Deep
status,
one
that
people
voted
against,
there
are
five
different
guilds
that
each
have
their
own
priorities.
So
the
operations
voice,
swapper,
Zeke's,
gov
and
carrot.
You
can
see
the
different
priorities,
the
numbers
that
were
listed
there,
and
so
this
came
from
an
initial
submission
list
that
some
of
us
did
and
then
all
the
guild
leads.
I
think
individually
also
submitted
some
different
priorities.
There
there
were
15
addresses
that
participated,
I
think
maybe
it's
one
or
two
more,
but
it
was
hard
to
cross-reference.
A
The
addresses
at
least
15
was
the
most
widely
used,
at
least
for
the
teach
Dow
priorities
board.
So
I
think
those
15
addresses
right.
That
represents
I.
Think
if
you
look
at
all
those
addresses,
you
can
figure
out
where
they
come
from
I.
Think
almost
all
of
them
were
like
current
contributors
that
are
very
active,
so
we
can
see
who
the
base
of
this
is
and
I
hope
that
we
can
very
much
expand
that
to
not
just
the
current
contributors
but
I
think
it's
a
very
good
base
for
the.
A
From
rep
holders
from
the
governance
participants
in
DX
Dao
and
then
also
like
a
way
of
kind
of
showing,
maybe
outside
or
dxt
holders
who
are
not
as
active
in
these
discussions
like
once,
we
kind
of
establish
this
and
once
we
kind
of
see
different
ways
of
how
this
functions
it'll
be
easy
for
them
to
come
in
and
Signal
things
themselves.
A
So
initial
learnings,
and
so
this
was
just
kind
of
some
initial
things
that
I
had
that
I
was
thought,
were
kind
of
with
the
experience.
So
this
is
separate
from
what
the
actual
priorities
are
and
kind
of
what
the
signal.
What
the
signal
from
that
should
should
be
in
discussing
that.
This
is
more
about
just
the
actual
structure
and
process
of
this.
A
So
one
there
is
this
like
number
of
priorities,
and
so
right
now
you
have,
as
I
said,
there's
19
on
the
main
one
there's
like
10
or
12
on
the
other
guilds.
So
is
that
too
much?
A
And
then,
if
you
look
at
some
of
those,
they
may
overlap
a
little
bit
and
when
you
have
like
priorities
that
overlap,
you're
kind
of
siphoning
off
votes
or
allocation
from
one
priority
and
putting
it
in
another
like
if
there's
two
priorities
that
are
like
very,
very
similar
you
are
in,
or
you
should
be
making
sure
that
that's
like
a
single
priority
or
in
order
to
maximize
your
influence.
You
can
see
how
that
could
get
split
up.
So.
A
A
But
maybe
you
should
switch
your
vote
for
this,
so
we
can
kind
of
get
our
combined
thing.
I
think
maybe
for
now,
I'd
prefer
the
latter,
where
the
consolidation
is
coming
from
people
themselves
that
want
to
see
their
priority
higher
up.
I
think
this
whole,
like
lobbying
process,
trying
to
persuade
people
to
Signal
a
certain
way
is
an
important
part
of
the
process.
So
we
want
people
to
be
trying
to
convince
people
to
you,
know,
change
their
votes
or
produce
something
different.
So
that's
the
first
thing.
A
The
second
thing
is
more
info
on
the
priorities,
so
one
I
think
the
wording
of
these
things
actually
matters
a
lot
more
and
I.
Don't
know
exactly
if
there's
like
a
formal
process
for
that,
as
I
said,
I
think
these
initial
ones,
like
the
actual
wording
for
that
I,
think
they
came
either
from
The
Guild
leads
or
from
myself
or
from
Sky,
and
you
know,
does
that
need
to
be,
like
the
final
say
on
those,
and
how
would
you
kind
of
change
the
wording
on
that?
A
Furthermore,
it
would
be
great
to
have
some
actually
info
and
background
on
what
those
are
right.
Maybe
two
three
sentences
about
what
that
priority
is
trying
to
do
so
figuring
out
how
that
info
is
and
then
figuring
out.
Well,
who
would
control
that
info?
Who
would
write?
That
is
that
something
that
needs
to
be
in
like
the
voice
of.
C
A
Guilds
or
something
there
and
then
I
guess
that's
the
other
thing
is
then
the
voters
themselves
could
actually
give
commentary
which
I
think
is
important
because,
like
this
is
it's
a
very
not
rudimentary,
but
like
crude
I,
guess
crude
way
of
gathering
signal,
and
that
can
be
really
helpful
because
you
put
numbers
on
things.
It
allows
things
to
compare
and
you're
like
okay,
I
see
it
in
a
different
way,
but
that
doesn't
necessarily
capture
all
of
the
Nuance
context.
A
That
is
needed
for
this
type
of
discussion,
because
boiling
things
down
to
just
like
a
number
isn't
always
best
so
I
think
you're,
showing
as
much
of
the
context
and
I
think.
The
comments
is
a
very
good
idea
of
doing
that.
A
The
third
one
that
I
was
kind
of
playing
around
with
was
like
the
ongoing,
whether
it's
an
ongoing
Vote
or
like
a
start
and
end
component
to
it.
So
do
we
need
something
where
it's
like?
Okay,
it's
gonna,
be
voting
open
for
these
days
or
is
something
that's
just
going
to
be
always
running
and
anyone
can
change
their
priorities
at
any
time.
A
But
there
isn't
like
a
set
time
for
this
I
think
the
key
benefit
of
the
last
one
is
that
for
that
you
don't
need
to
have
people
engage
and
do
this
process
every
month
from
a
new
you
can
basically
use
their
default
from
the
last
month.
Is,
is
kind
of
like
already
already
set
in
that,
and
then
the
downside,
I
guess
of
that
is
is
of
course,
that
you're
not
you've
got
a
lot
of
old
signal
there.
A
So
maybe
things
have
changed,
but
people
have
not
updated
their
things
as
much
and
I
initially
thought
that
it
would
be
best
to
have
the
start
and
end.
It's
like
a
way
of
capturing
it,
but
I'm,
actually
leaning
towards
the
ongoing
vote.
I
think
that's
like
a
a
little
bit
easier
system
to
capture
that.
Maybe
things
change
if
there's
any
type
of
other
things.
Besides
just
like
signal
from
this
so
yeah,
those
are
like
the
initial
learnings
I.
Think
from
the
process.
A
A
So
I
think
there's
two
I
guess
one
disguise
is
correct:
the
way
that
these
initial
points
were
allocated
right,
so
I
think
candy
Fork
at
like
93,
whatever
like
points
for
that
was
purely
based
on
gnosis
chain
reputation,
amounts
and
the
deep
sea
holders
could
be
manually
added
and
manually
given
points
for
that.
But
that
was
not
an
automatic
done.
So
I
guess
there's
a
little
bit
in
terms
of
like
a
lot
of
them.
Didn't
have
actually
any
voting
power
for
that
and
then
the
second
one
is
well.
A
Why
didn't
they
kind
of
engage
with
it?
I'd
be
in
favor
of
just
giving
that
points
allocation
to
the
detailers
that
have
that
amount.
We
need
to
obviously
agree
upon
some
some
way
of
what
exactly
that
amount
is
that
translates
into
rep
and
I.
Think
if
you
give
that
to
them,
then
you
are
doing
a
much
better
job
of
inviting
them
to
participate
in
this
rather
than
like
just
you
know,
filling
out
this
form
and
then
doing
it
but
Sky.
Maybe
you
want
to
give
something
to
speak
to
that.
E
Yeah,
it
was
initially
chain
rep,
even
when
you
look
at
wallets
that
would
be
a
combination
of
rep
and
DxD.
It's
like
a
marginal
difference
and
then
any
big
dxt
holders
or
you
it
could
be.
We
could
enable
any
DxD
wallet,
that's
holding
DxD
on
any
chain
to
have
some
voting
points,
but
if,
if
a
dxt
holder
wouldn't
doesn't
even
want
to
like
say
that
they're
interested
in
participating,
my
guess
is
they
wouldn't
vote
anyway.
So
it's
not
very.
It
wasn't
very
hard
to
like
say
I
want
to
vote
with
my
DxD.
E
A
Look
at
Chris
I
mean
sorry
that
Ross
said
because
I
think
submitting
the
form
you
have
to
dox
your
your
address
right,
which
I
think
is
a
pretty
big.
No.
C
A
E
E
E
D
E
A
It's
that's
fine,
but
like
so,
for
instance,
if
I
wanted
to
reach
out
to
deep
sea
order
and
say
to
participate
like
getting
them
to
fill
out,
a
form
is
just
not
that
great
his
versus,
like
hey,
use
this
app.
You
already
have
the
votes
there
and
I
guess,
like
I,
really
have
not
figured
out
why
that
would
be
bad
to
just
give
like
agree
on
a
number
1000
DxD
equals
whatever
four
percent
rep.
As
you
said
like.
Why
not
do
that?
What
is
the
downside
of
doing
that?.
B
E
E
Yeah
I
wouldn't
call
it
a
gatekeeper.
I
was
like
it's
like
a
it's
almost
like
a
good
extra
step
that
if,
if
people
actually
care
at
all
about
voting,
they
simply
just
anonymously
put
a
wallet
address
on
there.
Yeah.
D
So,
okay,
first
time
we
tried
by
having
this
gatekeeper
second
time,
let's
try
by
giving
oats
to
everybody
and
then
see
if
people
are
interested.
A
Yeah
cool
any
other
like
initial,
because
again,
it's
filling
out
a
form
to
get
someone
to
do
something
versus
like
hey
vote
on
this
right
now.
It's
just
like
a
different
UI
experience
and
I
would
definitely
do
reach
out
to
people
if
they
wasn't,
you
have
to
fill
out
a
form
other
things
about
this,
as
I
said,
get
kind
of
some
of
these
things
about
maybe
like
there's
consolidation.
Is
there
overlap
in
these
things?
A
Yeah
I
mean
I,
think
it's
interesting
I
think
for
right
now
it's
kind
of
just
look
at
the
signal.
I
think
when
you're
Gathering
signal
signal
by
definition
is
going
to
be
well,
not
bad.
It's
going
to
be
very
noisy
right
and
so
like,
for
instance,
Gallup
polls,
I
think,
are
very
powerful
for
looking
at
the
state
of
public
opinion
in
the
U.S,
precisely
because
they
have
like
an
85-year
track
record
of
asking
the
exact
same
questions
to
a
certain
different.
You
know
to
the
same
group
of
people.
A
So
if
you
see
like
a
small
bump,
you
know
that
that
is
actually
some
signal
that
you
can.
You
can
draw
from
and
that's
actually
something
notable,
whereas
if
you
look
at
like
polling
that
are
just
like
snapshot
polling
of
different
events,
those
tend
to
be
very
noisy
and
like
I.
Personally,
don't
think
this
should
always
have
such
strong
signal.
A
You
should
you
shouldn't.
Take
that
signal
as
gospel.
You
shouldn't
necessarily
like
abide
by
that
and
so
I
think
here
it's
request.
I,
don't
think
we're
really
at
any
point
that
we
can
act
on
this
or
people
can
do
that.
I!
Think
we're
just
still
in
like
the
Gathering
signal,
stilling
phase
and
making
you
know
incorporating
other
people
kind
of
figuring
things
out.
So
I
think
it's
interesting
to
look
at
now,
but
I
don't
think
it
should
be
dictating
any
anything
for
for
a
while.
A
Cool:
let's:
let's,
why
don't
we
go
ahead
and
look
at
this
and
then
we
can
kind
of
go
from
here.
Let
me
change.
A
E
A
All
those
that
list
of
wallets
is
probably
it's
gonna
be
deterministic
in
some
way
exception,
I
mean
well,
snapshot,
doesn't
allow
the
allocation
I
think
across
as
many
things,
and
it
wouldn't
allow
the
ongoing
component
I.
D
Think
I
think
you
can
use
weighted
voting
in
snapshot.
It
allows
you
to
choose
like
how
many
points
do
you
want
to
give?
How.
D
A
I,
don't
think
rep
is
erc20,
it's
just
a
list,
but
I,
don't
think
it's
erc20
format,
but
it
could
work
I'm,
not
saying
it
doesn't
work,
I,
think
so.
The
big,
the
big
downside,
I,
think
there's
there's
two
downsides
one.
You
can't
submit
new
priorities
right,
so
there
would
have
to
be
some
like
official
list
of
what
those
are
that
would
go
into
the
vote
and
then
two
you
can't
do
the
kind
of
ongoing
nature
of
this.
So
you
would
require
people
to
basically
like
keep
voting
month
after
month.
D
I
mean
I,
don't
like
this
ongoing
nature
of
it
as
well,
because
I
mean
the
signal
constantly
keeps
changing
for
us
fixing
one
feature
in
product
development
I'm
talking
generally
about
product
development.
So
if
you
have
to
fix
a
feature
it
takes
about
four
weeks
to
six
weeks
and
if
there,
if,
if
the
amount
of
changes
is
going
to
be
like
every
day
every
week,
then
I
mean
it's
it's
difficult
to
take
any
actions
out
of
it.
A
Actually
would
might
get
less
voting
by
doing
the
ongoing
one,
because
people
would
not
be
changing
their
priorities
as
opposed,
if
you
do,
if
you
do
that
before,
where
every
month
you're
getting
people
to
vote,
I
think
you're
going
to
narrow
down
the
number
of
votes
that
you
have
and
so
that
you're
really
just
getting
signal
from,
like
the
very
very
like
rabbit
participants.
A
If
you
do
that,
and
so
that's
the
reason,
I
have
favorite
the
ongoing
one
and
I
think
a
point
I
keep
making
to
you
when
you're
asking
me
is
like
I,
think
looking
at
how
you're
interpreting
this
is
maybe
like
like
we
can
interpret
this
differently
versus.
We
want
to
gather
the
signal
and
I.
Think
I
would
advise
again
using
this
as
gospel
in
any
way,
because
you
have
to
establish
a
track
record
to
be
able
to
get
a
signal.
So
I
know
it
takes
like
a
lot
to
this.
C
A
Of
I
think
something
to
think
about,
like
governance
in
in
general,
in
public
governance
right
they
talk
about
this
with
politicians
all
the
time
like
don't
respond
to
the
polling
right,
but
that
doesn't
mean
you
don't
look
a
lot
at
the
polling
right.
It's
really
important
to
know
what
the
polling
is
and
how
that
changes.
But
it's
a
different
skill
set
to
understand
the
polling.
Will
gyrate
and
change
a
lot
and
not
just
react
to
it.
I
think
that's
the
skill
set
that
would
be
better
from
learning
here.
A
Less
participation,
if
you're
doing
like
six
kind
of
seven
votes
over
you
know
a
four
or
five
day
period
over
like
every
month
versus,
say
Hey.
You
can
come
here
and
vote
whenever
whenever
you
like
and
I,
also
think
it's
a
little
bit
better
like
the
UI
and
not
having
like
having
these
separate
from
proposals
and
kind
kind
of
signaling
that
there
I
know
that
people
are
like,
preferring
anything
that
is
not
homegrown
and
made
with
people
that
are
like
helping
geek
style,
but
I
think
that's
actually
the
way
that
things
get
better
talk.
A
D
C
The
other
piece
of
what
you
were
saying
before,
where
it
makes
a
big
difference,
whether
this
wording
is
sort
of
top
down
or
bottom
up,
like
whether
the
people
who
are
voting
can
say
what
they
think.
This
thing
Means
versus
someone
going
in
and
writing
out
very
specifically
what
it
means
and
like
if
you
want
pure
signal,
then
having
someone
come
in
and
write
exactly
what
these
things
mean
and
we
would
have
to
decide
who
does
that.
But
otherwise
it's
an
opportunity
to
sort
of
further
a
discussion
of.
C
We
have
this
sort
of
general
statement
and
then
different
people
may
have
different
interpretations
of
what
that
is,
and
that
furthers
the
conversation
it's
less
about
getting
pure
signal
out
of
this.
But
having
a
broader
conversation
about
what
these
things
mean
and
why
they're
prioritized.
A
And
then
venki's
question
in
the
chat
is
espnd
style.
Product
I
would
prefer
to
use
guilds
if
we
have
a
choice.
I
completely
agree
that
we
want
to
that's
what
we
want
as
the
end
state
right
is
to
integrate
this
directly
into
DX
down
governance,
but
I
think
that
means
like
hacking
on
something
that
we
can
integrate
into
it
with
a
developer.
That
likes
shows
some
interest
there,
but.
A
Need
to
figure
out
exactly
kind
of
what
the
product
is
by
dog
food
and
using
it
troubleshooting
it
having
these
different
like
conversations
about
it.
So
I
definitely
think
this
is
like
the
end
goal
for
this.
For
all
of
these
things,
that
teach
style
is
trying
in
terms
of
tooling
is
so
that
it
plugs
in
nicely
to
seeks
out
governance,
which
should
also
be
the
government.
D
The
only
difference
is
I
mean
I,
don't
like
using
I
mean
I,
don't
mind
using
any
tool.
The
only
thing
is
like
if
you
use
Snapshot
and
that's
like
the
Benchmark
and
then
and
whatever
tool
that
we
built
internally,
we
will
try
to
reach
that
Benchmark.
If
we
use
something
like
ESP,
then
that
becomes
like
a
Baseline
and
then
if
Davi
is
better,
then
we
say
that
okay,
we
have
been.
We
are
using
a
tool
that
is
better
than
what
we
were
using.
E
D
E
To
combine,
you
can't
combine
using
some
algorithm,
rep
and
DxD
on.
C
C
E
B
What
what
I'm
saying
is
on
Snapchat
there
are
like
you,
can
build
a
custom,
vaulting
module
which
is
like
how
voting
power
is
calculated
right,
I
mean
anyone
can
set
up
a
snapshot
and
then,
when
you
they're
called
like
strategies
so
like
the
most
basic
one
is
just
erc20
balance
or
but
then
you
can
do
like
a
white
list.
You
can
do
multi-chain.
You
can
do
your
like
nft
balance.
You
can
do
with
multipliers.
You
can
do
only
a
minimum
balance.
B
A
But
governance,
2.0
I
mean
a
couple
things,
so
one
governance
2.0
gives
them
time
multiplier
effect
to
DHD
state,
which
I
think
is
like
a
massive
thing
when
we
think
about
DxD
older
snapshots
now,
like
that's
the
big
reason
why
I
don't
think
like
token
holder
votes
work
is
if
you
have
no
kind
of
time
multiplier.
I
think
two,
the
biggest
thing
snapshot
is
not
on
chain
right.
There's,
no,
even
like
you
sign
with
your
wallet,
but
there's
no,
even
like
on-chain
element
to
it
at
all.
A
It's
clearly
taking,
like
you
know,
take
the
snapshot
as
opposed
to
ESP,
which
is
building
on
gnosis
chain.
You
can
kind
of
get
that
there
so
I
mean
I'm
happy
to
do
things
on
Snapchat
individually
for
votes.
I,
just
don't
think,
there's
any
evidence
that
it
is
somehow
like
a
beneficial
platform,
long
term
for
deak
style,
given
the
decentralization
concerns
or
some
way
to
actually
integrate
into
Davi
products
here
and
I
actually
think
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
here
with
ESP,
but.
D
How
would
I
put
it
now
I'm
trying
to
collect
my
words
here?
I
mean
we
need
to
work
a
lot
on
ESP
if
we
have
to
make
it
like
ongoing
votes,
I
mean.
When
would
you
take
the
snapshot
on
how
much
DxD
that
I
have
today
and
then
I
wrote
it
and
then
what
happens
tomorrow?
I
sell
my
DxD
yeah.
B
D
There's
like
a
lot
of
things
that
ESP
has
to
upgrade
itself.
So
that's
why
I
was
suggesting
that
maybe
we
should
just
use
Snapshot
and
then
accustom
our
dxt
holders
to
a
tool
that
everybody
is
using
and
snapshot
is
really
good
in
their
ux
as
well,
and
it
is.
It
is
also
a
lesson
for
our
Davi
to
actually
see
how
close
that
we
could
be
to
snapshot
in
terms
of
voting
so
that
that's
that's
the
only
thing.
Yeah.
A
And
I
want
to
move
on
to
the
actual
results
of
this,
because
this
is
like
I
think
an
important
thing,
we're
kind
of
figuring
out
for
here,
because
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
signal
in
this
I.
Don't
I,
don't
think
this
is
a
proposal
right
in
the
way
to
think
about
this
I
think
that's
kind
of
like
the
wrong
framing
I.
Think
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
is
more
expand.
The
different
signaling
options
that
you
get
and
like
having
a
difference
between
that
I
know.
A
Think
this
is
like
an
idea
when
you
think
of
polling
and
signaling
that
it's
just
like
an
untapped
area
and
I,
don't
think
snapshot
is
good
at
polling
really
at
all
and
I.
Think
you
see
that
they
do
that
two
is
yeah.
My
camera
I
was
gonna,
say
with
that.
I
see
that
I
guess
two
venky
I
also
don't
think
at
all.
It
makes
any
sense
to
because
snapshot.
A
I,
don't
think
is
like
in
any
long-term
way,
could
be,
could
fill
this
role
and
so
like
at
some
point
you're
going
to
have
to
move
everyone
over
and
I
think
this
is
kind
of
again
going
back
to
the
whole
dog
food
process.
Things
do
not
have
to
be
figured
out
at
first,
and
you
should
be
okay
with
having
confusion
about
how
these
things
work
together
and
that's
why
I
keep
saying
we
don't
need
to
be
making
sure
that
this
has
like
this
signal
that
we
need
to
like
worship
as
gospel
right
now,.
A
About
figuring
out
these
Kinks
now
and
I'd,
rather
do
that
through
something
where
we
have
some
ability
to
do
that
and
then
I
think.
Lastly,
there's
no,
maybe
this
is
wrong
for
snapshot.
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
is
their
ability
to
allocate
different
amounts
of
votes,
or
is
it
simply,
you
could
do
like
a
rank
choice
votict
for
that
I
think
it's
probably
just
ranked
choice.
A
D
If
I
have
100,
dxt
I
could
say
like
okay,
this
one
gets
30
and
this
one
gets
20.
yeah,
because
I
have
I
think
I
have
voted
for
some
of
the
fee
governance
before
in
one
of
the
other
Nexus.
Where
yeah
you
can
basically
choose
how
much
of
my
voting
power
I
could
spread
across
different
LPS.
A
Cool,
so
let's
head
over
and
kind
of
look
at
these
signals
because-
and
this
is
a
great
way
to
kind
of
signal
this
as
part
of
that
so
I
just
wanted
to.
Like
maybe
talk
about
some
of
the
results.
As
I
said,
there
were
15
people
that
are
15
entities
that
contributed
there
and
I.
A
Think
they're
telling
I
think
I
was
talking
to
someone
is
basically
like
they're,
not
necessarily
surprising,
but
maybe
they
unearth
some
unspoken
kind
of
things
about
how
what
people
kind
of
feel
and
different
priorities
there
that
are
out
there
I
think
it's
very
good
to
have
that
out
in
the
open.
So
we
can
kind
of
like
work
from
that,
so
I
think
here
just
for
you
can
see
the
the
since
this
is
candy
Forks
account.
You
can
see
the
actual
allocation
for
these
here.
A
This
is
from
Candy
Forks,
but
you
can
see
the
different
ones
for
the
overall
here
yeah
and
looking
at
these
I
think
you
see
a
couple
things
one.
There
seems
to
be
some
agreement
on
this
Flagship
product
Vision
admission
there
from
a
couple
different
addresses
here
and
then
I
think
you're.
Looking
at
like
the
big
four
I,
don't
know
kind
of
initiatives
or
products,
I
guess
the
Deep
style
is
building
thinking
that
both
DX
gov
kind
of
has
two
different
one
ones
here.
A
So
governance
2.0
we're
just
talking
about
that
swapper
Dobby
and
carrot
and
I
think
kind
of
just
looking
at
some
of
the
numbers
here.
They're
all
relatively
I,
don't
know
close
to
each
other
and
I
think
kind
of
have
a
very
signal,
a
strong
signal
here
for
like
what
are
the
top
five
priorities
for
DX
style.
A
Here
right
we
have
developing
this
Flagship
product
vision
and
Mission
and
then
like
these
are
the
big
four
almost
like
product
technical
challenges,
I
think
they
were
focusing
on
there
and
then
you
get
like
the
bottom
five
here,
there's
a
you
know
another
wave
of
different
types
of
things
that
are
they're
implemented
here,
but
not
as
you
know,
there
seems
to
be
some
coalescing
around
these
different
things.
A
I
think
it's
interesting
to
see
how
people
also
you
know,
spent
their
signals
here,
so
you
can
see
kind
of
the
different
amounts
and
again
these
are
based
on
the
amount
of
rep.
Only
here
and
so
I
think
you
can
see
different
people
have
different
strategies.
I
think
sky
was
similar
to
Candy
fork
and
kind
of
spreading
it
around
across
several
different
priorities.
A
I
think
you're,
looking
at
like
kind
of
Ross
and
Goose,
no
Ross
kind
of
you
know,
focus
on
on
Davi,
I
think,
which
is
a
very
good
thing.
Anyone
that
should
be
on
their
their
products
should
be
very
much
like
kind
of
focused
focused
on
that
just
an
example
yeah,
and
then
we
have
kind
of
another
spread
out
here.
A
Be
should
be
kind
of
focused
on
swapper.
That's
what
he
thinks
kind
of
the
Dows
priorities
there.
So
he's
gotta
clearly
voting
for
there
for
those
and
then
yeah
you
can
see
as
I
said,
I
kind
of
spread
things
out
a
little
in
terms
of
the
focus
I
still
think
the
governance
2.0
is
is
the
top
priority
of
of
the
Dow.
We
can
do.
A
Things
there
and
then
yeah
Xerox
clong
Keenan,
spreading
it
around
a
little
bit
as
well,
but
clearly
kind
of
focused
on
on
some
areas
here
that
are
near
and
dear
to
his
heart
and
then
yeah
Medusa
nice
spreading
it
around
I
think
to
some
some
key
ones,
not
just
on
the
the
governance
elements.
There
is
good
and
then
yeah
I
don't
know.
If
there's
any
thoughts
or
kind
of
reactions
to
maybe
the
signals
here,
whether
that
seems
like
right
or
seems
a
little
different
was
there
anything
surprising.
A
A
A
So
maybe
I
think
voice
is
actually
probably
the
most
amenable
to
different
signal
here.
But
here
you
also
see
the
existence
right
of
the
three
different
products
here:
right,
carrot,
geeksgov
and
swapper
kind
of
interesting
I.
Think
that
carrot
is
the
top
priority
here,
which
is
a
little
bit
different
than
what
you'd
see
on
on
Deeks
Dow
as
a
whole,
but
I
would
guess
maybe
putting
some
words
into
the
voters
at
the
top
here.
I
also
voted
for
it.
A
It
seems,
like
carrot,
is
kind
of
ready
for
a
prime
time
launch
in
a
way
and
that
could
attract
some
some
marketing
resources.
There,
specifically
like
around
the
launch
itself,
since
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
in
the
in
the
past
and
so
gearing
up
for
this
one
right
here,
yeah
and
it's
a
maybe
that's
like
of
the
products-
that's
the
one.
B
A
You
see
the
flagship
products
Suite
that
was
from
the
overall
the
geek
style
board,
as
implemented
by
by
the
voice.
Guild
here
is
kind
of
leaving
that
effort.
There
there's
been
a
couple
posts
in
the
or
a
post
in
the
Forum
and
some
good
discussion
on
on
that,
and
so
that.
A
Now
and
be
interested
to
see
how,
like
the
flagship
product
Suite
of
that
comes
out
there
and
then
yeah
D
Scott
branding
and
go
to
market
strategy.
I
think
you
know
that
involves
some
of
the
stuff
that
we
just
saw
today
in
the
version
V3
released.
A
There
was
some
nice
new
I
think
a
coat
of
paint
on
that
and
and
things
looks
good
there,
and
so
maybe
looking
at
Deek's
gov,
it's
kind
of
going
through
another
product,
iteration
cycle
and
so
kind
of
itching
or
inching
towards
that
like
wider
push,
but
still
probably
needs
to
figure
out
a
lot
of
key
things.
Maybe
namely
like
what
is
the
name
for
that,
but
is,
is
a
big
priority,
I
think
like
overall
there
and
then
yeah.
We've
got
swapper
kind
of
right
behind
there
at
75.
There.
A
So
kind
of
the
same
thing
then,
are
when
the
three
products
kind
of
there
of
seeing
where
some
of
the
votes
for
those
go
and
then
yeah
so
there's
I
think
the
top
four
like
pretty
pretty
strong,
and
then
you
kind
of
have
like
a
tie
for
five
for
fifth
year
with
developing
key
Partnerships.
A
Here
a
nice
split
vote
and
then
continuously
presenting
deep
Styles
mission
and
vision
to
web3
commuters,
like
one
of
those
kind
of
like
ongoing
priorities
that
are
implemented
there
and
then
yeah.
Maybe
a
good
example
of
something
that
I
would
maybe
I
don't
know
if
that
would
change,
but
like
the
swapper
Expeditions
and
go
to
market
strategy,
like
you
know,
I
kind
of
see
and
I
think
I
voted
yeah,
so
Kenny
Ford
voted
for
this
with
15
and
that
to
me
was
kind
of
thinking
just
swapper
in
general.
A
But
now
it
seems
that
this,
like
swapper
marketing,
Partnerships
and
growth
post,
is
a
little
bit
more
Gathering
and
I.
Guess.
Maybe
that's
the
shelling
point
that
people
are
gathering
around
so
yeah
I
would
probably
consider
whether
I
should
consolidate
that
to
express
the
opinions
more
directly
but
yeah.
Just
an
example
of
some
of
the
the
issue
or
the
discussion
point
from
earlier.
A
So
yeah
any
kind
of
thoughts
on
this
one.
You
can
see
a
couple
different
ones
at
the
bottom
here,
like
community
outreach,
something
that's
always
there
operation
decentralization,
maybe
a
little
bit
on
the
back
burner.
I
think
this
is
a
good
example
of
like,
even
though
it's
maybe
a
cool
idea.
It's
not
necessarily
like
a
priority
right
now
should
not
be
getting
the
resources
of
that,
but
yeah
thoughts
comments.
Anyone
want
to
give
further
context
to
their
vote.
D
C
A
There
you
go
yeah,
yeah
and
I
think
this
is
a
good
example
of
like.
Maybe
you
can
it's
easier
to
ask
that
question
of
Keenan
and
of
the
voice
Squad
when
you're,
like
you
can
point
to
this
as
like.
A
D
And
if
this
product
should
document
comes
out,
do
you
think
we
will
have
enough
right
Developers
to
work
on
this
product,
or
is
this
the
direction
that
the
extra
will
go
towards.
A
A
Cool
and
then
just
looking
at
operations
here
again,
maybe
looking
at
an
interesting
one,
is
thinking
about
treasury
deployment,
as
that's
a
seems
to
be
something
signaled
and
and
why,
as
you
can
see
yeah,
we
got
some
a
lot
of
interest
from
doing
that.
I
think
the
conversation
around
the.
A
D
A
A
lot
of
different
people-
and
you
know,
could
also
show
how
you
can
signal
something
very
strongly
with
just
by
devoting
a
lot
of
your
points
to
that,
and
then
in
act
for
structuring
refocus
proposal.
This
is
I
think
is
also
kind
of
been
a
key
focus
of
operations.
A
Squad
in
this
kind
of
proposal,
I
mean
this
call
itself
and
kind
of
filling
that
out
and
I
think
you
know
pretty
wide
voting
on
that
and
then
yeah.
So
those
are
kind
of
clearly
the
first
two
priorities
that
Ford
operation,
Squad
I,
think
are
a
guild
and
are
also
kind
of
taking
up
most
of
the
time
and
focus
right
now
and
then
below
the
governance
and
developer
public
halls.
I
think
those
are
remain
like
a
core
way
of
engaging
with
the
community.
A
The
developer
called
before
this,
and
then
also
the
governance
call
there,
but
is
a
a
kind
of
medium
priority
there
or
Augusta
thinks
they're
very
important
and
then
executing
the
new
token
model.
This
is
again
something
I
think
has
been
taking
a
lot
of
operation
scale
time
over
the
last
a
couple
weeks
here
and
is
clearly
yeah.
One
of
the
priorities
there
so
yeah.
A
The
clear
four
ones
there
and
then
yeah,
the
fifth
and
and
six
ones
here,
are
a
little
bit
less
of
a
priority,
but
still
kind
of
important
and
clear,
clearly
kind
of
some
some
feedback
there
and
I.
Think
things
like
this
contribute
in
improve
contributor
feedback
process
right,
I.
Think
it's
a
good
example.
Thank
you
like
I
know
this
is
you
had
brought
this
up
in
some
of
the
chats
and
you
know
being.
C
A
This
as
a
way
of
moving
this
priority
up
the
up
the
board,
so
I
think
that's
a
cool
way,
and
it's
good
to
see
that
signal
here
and
yeah
I
think
there
were
trying
to
think
of
any
others
that
were
interesting.
That
caught
my
well
here,
you
go
further,
indeed
style,
ESP
I
think
that's
a
new
one.
I
didn't
see,
I'm,
not
sure
what
geek
Style's
multi-token
design
is
but
interesting,
and
then.
E
That's
just
like
how
the
current
DXL
related
tokens
and
new
potential
DX
dot
tokens
would
all
relate
to
relate
to
each
other,
and
you
know
Drive
value
between
them
and
like
should
more
products,
have
tokens
or
not
have
tokens
and
and
how
it
all
relates
to
the
XT.
Basically,
but
it's
basically,
you
have
to
research
that,
because
it's
a
complex
thing,
but
we
could
also
have
more
practical.
E
A
Cool
and
then,
as
I
said,
I
think
the
the
more
the
signal
is
I
think
on
those
three
because
they're
the
obviously
the
overall
is
a
great
way
of
seeing
where
the
community's
interest
is
as
broadly
but
I
think
operations
of
voice,
because
they
service
a
lot
the
other
product
guilds
a
lot
of
times.
A
They
have
to
make
the
decision
in
terms
of
allocating
time
and
resources
there,
so
that
was
probably
the
strongest
one
but
to
go
over
yeah
the
but
I
think
it's
still
a
good
signal
kind
of
to
see
this
there
so
looking
at
swap
for
one
here,
I
think
you
can
see
a
front-end
maintenance
and
Bug
fixes.
I
think
this
is
more
kind
of
going
after
making
sure
that
the
the
front
end
kind
of
is
a
really
awesome
place
decentralized
in
private
place
to
to
to
trade.
A
Someone
just
I
can't
remember
how
much,
but
you
can
voted
in
that
so
yeah
zapping
contracts-
and
you
can
see
here
some
nice
strong
support
from
yeah,
Ross
and
Medusa
from
from
from
Dev
side
and
then
yeah,
delivering,
yeah
and
I
think
these
are
kind
of
clearly
too
it's
really
cool.
A
Actually,
you
hear
the
zapping
contracts
update
on
the
developer
call
here,
and
it
sounds
like
that
is
ready
for
internal
or
de-established
view
by
some
other
developers
before
going
to
an
audit
and
I
was
just
looking
into
that
was
part
of
there's
a
contingency
cost
for.
C
A
In
the
one
inch
2023
budget,
so
it's
kind
of
cool
that
those
are
the
yeah
things
there
and
look
at
that.
Zapping
contracts
is
now
moved
up
into
into
one
with
another
vote
there
I
got
to
see
who
maybe
that
was
yeah
the
living
Revenue
just
one
per
token,
so
I
think
this
is
something
we've
chatted
about
here.
A
To
kind
of
see
nice
strong
support
from
a
very
like
wide
base
of
of
individuals.
Here,
yeah
Eco,
router,
Improvement
I
think
the
eager
router
is
like.
Definitely
this
is
something
Kitty
Fork
signal.
I
think
is
it's
one
of
the
strongest
thing
in
the
eagle
around
I
was
like
definitely
one
of
the
coolest
things
about
swapper,
I.
Think
making
sure
that
that
is
kind
of
competitive
and
is
is
operating.
It's
just
the
easy
thing
to
use.
I
think
is
very
important
here
and
then
yeah.
Some
other
support
from.
D
A
Swapper
Expeditions
and
user
acquisition
I
think
you
know
this
example
of
like
a
priority.
That
I
guess
still
depends
a
little
bit
on
not
an
external
entity,
but
I
know
that
I
guess
you
know
sorry
that
was
arbitrary
Odyssey
but
trying
to
make
sure
that
priority
lines
up
with
that
can
be
difficult.
A
Even
if
it's
something
that
Deeks
out
itself
prioritizes
and
then
yeah
we
can
see
liquidity.eth
I
know
this
has
been
an
interest
of
of
several,
and
so
you
can
see
here,
I
guess
that's
like
the
fifth
yeah
or
sixth
priority
there
here
so
starting
to
get
like
kind
of
sub
signal
here
in
terms
of
zapping
contracts,
front
end
maintenance,
yeah,
delivering
Revenue,
Eco,
router,
Improvement,
swamp
breaks,
Traditions
are
kind
of
like
the
other
things
that
are
important
and
then
yeah
I
think
Mev
capture,
game
and
research.
A
This
is
something
Candy
fork
and
looks
like
Skye
voted
on.
I
think
is
a
cool
opportunity,
maybe
to
work
with
Cal
swap
on
this,
and
maybe
look
at
some
of
the
possibilities
on
the
the
swapper
back
end
in
general,
splitting
swap
from
swapper
I
know.
This
was
a
conversation
about
like
basic
kind
of
almost
expanding
swapper
by
peeling
off
like
a
core
function
from
it.
So
you
can
add
more
bells
and
whistles
to
other
things,
but
keep
that
as
like
a
very
very
base.
One
Network
expansion,
I
think
is
yeah.
A
Of
interesting
that,
maybe
not
everyone
is,
is
voting
for
that.
That
seems
to
be
something
that
a
lot
of
times
it's
like.
We
need
to
be
expanding,
more
networks,
but
I
think
partly
because
swapper
the
front,
for
instance,
is
on
too
many
networks.
There
and
I
also
think
yeah,
there's
a
maybe
a
diminishing
return
to
deploying
on
new
networks
and
trying
to
attract
revenue
and
then
yeah
in
unison,
V3
research.
Some
people
looks
like
sky
here
voted
for
that.
A
That's
a
good
example
like
maybe
that
one
could
gather
more
vote
more
signal
if
it
was
combined
with
the
Mev
capturing
amm
Research
into
how,
like
a
general
back,
end
research
that
some
something
like
that
would
be
a
way
of
maybe
moving
that
priority
up
the
list
there
and
then
yeah.
This
looks
like
it's.
A
new
DCA,
stacker
I
think
was
not
on
there
when
I
was
due
when.
A
But
that's
kind
of
the
the
new
yeah
tool
that
Adam
has
been
building
around,
that
kind
of
works
through
cow
swap
to
do
dollar
cost
averaging.
A
Cool
then
DX
gov
here
yeah
I,
think.
C
A
Is
looking
at
the
top
I
already,
you
know
again
this
one
aligns
with
dextao,
because
I
think
yeah
that
was
coverage.
2.0
was
the
second
priority
here,
and
maybe
this
is
a
little
bit
more
specific
on
what
that
one
is.
A
Is
a
very
good,
this
example
of
a
priority,
that's
written
like
very
clearly
or
you
kind
of
understand
it
right
contracts
plus
Dobby
support,
it's
kind
of
a
very
clear
one
of
that.
This
is
something
I
think
a
lot
of
different
people
voted
for
in
high
amounts
there,
because
ivanki
and
Candy
Fork,
as
well
kind
of
voting
for
that,
but
also
yeah
from
the
from
the
dixgov
team
and
then
there's
Davi
expansion
to
more
governance
systems.
So
this
is
not
just
through
guilds,
but
looking
at
at.
C
A
The
excav
itself,
I
think
those
are
the
top
three
votes
here
and
then
Skye
there.
So
that's
a
interesting
one.
There
Dobby
Dow,
Setup
Wizard
I
think
this
is
like
AKA,
a
factory
being
able
to
do
like
establish
a
doubt
really
like
quickly
through
the
platform.
A
I
think
that's
a
key
key
feature
to
be
able
to
have,
especially
when
you're
looking
at
like
deploying
on
low-cost
chains
like
notice,
chain
and
polygon
I
know
there
was
a
question
about
that
from
nylon
in
some
of
the
chats
earlier,
and
that
would
be
a
very
cool
thing
to
do,
and
I
also
think
that's
something
yeah.
You
can
see
here
a
pretty
wide.
C
A
With
the
Gusto
Sky
Keenan
and
others
davi's
social
ux
I
think
this
was
yeah.
More
of
I
talked
to
Ross
before,
as
I
know,
minutius
on
the
call.
If
he
wants
to
add
anything
about
this
but
yeah,
that's
another
key
thing
to
to
be
looking
at
I
think
same
thing
on
chain:
accessibility,
ux,
I,
think
this
is
like
looking
at
like
what
are
the
on-chain
actual
actions
of
that
and
then
yeah
you
can.
A
To
Signal
some
of
the
priorities
that
that
I
thought
were
important
or
candy
Fork
voted
for
here.
So
I
guess
this
is
yeah,
so
those
are
the
top
five
there,
but
at
52.
A
That,
maybe
is
not
that
sexy,
but
I
think
incredibly
important
to
the
way
it
takes
down
functioning
and
is
incredibly
important.
Role
for
dxgov
is
keeping
DX
vote
and
Alchemy,
and
the
Sim
security
bot
like
up
and
running
because
that's
yeah
I
think
very
important.
I.
Think
that's
why
you
see
some
voting
from
sky
and
myself
in
terms
of
that,
because
we're
frequent
participant
users
of
that
governance
and
then
yeah
the
rest.
The
bottom
are
more
again,
you
can
see
some
things
that
candy
Fork
voted
for.
A
That's
not
to
not
make
it
to
the
top
here,
but
yeah.
The
Dotty
internal
is
yeah
again
more
about
thinking
about
how
we
can
devote
resources
to
helping
take
style
governance
and
be
using
this
and
I
think
some
of
the
the
same
thing
for
the
expensive
system
or
contributors.
Is
there
a
way
we
can
get
so
indeed,
gov's
resources
and
time
focused
on
selling
some
of
the
deep
Styles
existing
issues,
not
just
for
other
Dows.
There.
C
D
Cool
yeah
I
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
since
we
don't
have
detailed
comments
about
each
of
these
signals,
it
was
really
difficult
for
me
to
vote
for
DX
go
so
I.
Just
voted
like
whatever
that
I
understood
I.
Think
I
voted
only
like
two
or
three
single
items.
A
Yeah
and
I
think
that's
good
because
a
we
kind
of
we.
We
know
that,
like
okay,
when
you
think
about
how
to
improved
that,
but
then
also
like
I,
think
it's
important
that
the
guilds
and
governance
themselves
are
able
to
communicate
the
ongoings
of
priorities
in
an
effective
way
to
governance
and
rep
holders
and
deity
holders
themselves
so
yeah.
That's
that
should
be
something
that
that
both
sides,
we
need
to
figure
out
how
to
do
better
and
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
vote
on
anything.
A
You
know
you
want
or
anything
you
you
feel
based
upon
your
your
current
information
and
then
that
signal
right
of
the
well.
This
is
clearly
the
only
things
people
understand.
You
know
that
means
there's
a
some
heavy
lifting
to
be
done
by
The.
Guild
skill
leads
governance
in
terms
of
like
explaining
why
these
other
things
are
important
and
need
a
priority,
any
kind
of
resources,
but
that's
that
persuasion
is
I.
Think
part
of
the
the
process.
E
Yeah,
that
was
a
someone
had
raised
that
point
early
on
that,
like
these
simple
titles,
are
not
super
clear,
there's
another
signaling
app
where,
like
there's
a
link
out,
so
you
could
like
for
each
one
of
these
there's
a
link
out
to
what
is
looks
almost
like
an
EIP
or
something
like
the
details
of
that
of
that
formal
signal
proposal
or
whatever
in
The
Way
We
Were.
Solving
it
initially
was
anyone
who
wants
to
participate
or
is
participating.
E
If
you
didn't
know
what
one
of
these
things
was,
you
can
just
ask
in
any
of
the
telegram
channels,
and
and
people
will
answer
it
so
having
a
like
dialogue
about
the
signals
as
you're
voting
on
them
is
actually
a
probably
like
a
really
beneficial
thing.
In
general,
I
mean
it
takes
a
little
more
time,
but
it
would
be
cool
if
people
were
talking
about
all
the
different
signals
and
trying
to
get
other
people
to
put
more
votes
toward
those
signals.
E
Like
you
were
saying
in
the
beginning,
like
a
dynamic,
it's
very
Dynamic
like
in,
like
oh
I,
see
everyone
voted
for.
You
know
it's
obvious
social,
ux,
I,
don't
really
know
what
that
means.
The
social
part
is
less
interesting
to
me.
I
could
even
reach
out
to
the
people
that
voted
for
it
and
say
like.
Why
do
you
think
this
is
so
important
because
I,
don't
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
it's
that
important
like
and
they
either
convinced
me
or
I
convince
them,
and
then
you
can
actually
change
your
allocation.
E
So,
like
that's
pretty
cool,
if
a
community
was
actively
doing
that,
that
was
also
one
I
thought
there'd
be
some
dxt
holders
who
would
have
some
interest
to
I
know
we
could
have
made
it
easier
for
them,
but
if
they
actually
wanted
to
vote
they
could
have
easily
voted
and
they
could
have
actually
talked
about
some
of
these
things
as
well,
and
we
could
have
a
we
could
all
we
could
even
have
a
channel
in
Discord
where
you're
it's
for
discussing
the
live
priorities,
Board
of
the
community
I
think
eventually,
every
Community
will
will
probably
have
something
like
that.
E
And,
oh,
that's
a
good
guess
that
answers
my
own
question.
If,
if
this
tool-
or
this
experience
was
embedded
in
Davi,
which
is
like
you
know,
we
did
have
some
voting
tool
in
alchemy,
which
didn't
work
that
well,
if
you
could,
in
the
discussion
down
below
the
actual
tool
using
orbis
or
whatever
you
were
using.
That's
where
the
discussion
was
happening
around
each
of
the
boards.
E
That
would
be
amazing
but
like
doesn't
exist
yet
right
now,
so
we're
gonna
have
to
like
work
around
and
we're
gonna
use
this
and
then
we're
going
to
use
key
base
and
we're
going
to
like
work
around
for
what
we
have
right
now,
but
eventually
I
agree.
It'd,
be
amazing.
If
this
was
all
embedded
in
Davi.
A
Well,
I
know
we're
running
up
on
the
hour
here,
so
I
don't
want
to
take
too
much
more
time
here,
but
yeah
you
can
kind
of
see.
This
is
Carrot
one
which
maybe
again
is
like
the
least
controversial,
I.
Think
partially,
because
it's
kind
of
the
the
balls
are
or
no
the
wheels
are
in
motion.
A
There
are
a
lot
of
like
exciting
things
there,
as
you
can
kind
of
see,
yeah
the
key
one
here,
release
V1
front
end
and
contracts,
and
we
saw
so
we've
seen
some
updates
on
on
both
of
those
recently
here
and
then
yeah
I
think
what
goes
in
conjunction
with
that
is
figuring
out
the
go
to
market
strategy
which
I
think
if
we
look
at
the
the
budget
that
was
passed
in
December
that
actually
the
ownership
of
that
goes
under
the
voice.
A
Guild,
but
I
do
think
that's
something
that
you
still
want
to
have
some
of
the
carrot,
Guild
participating
in
and
feedback
with.
All
that
so
I
think
it's
like
a
good
thing
to
have
is
like
a
top.
A
A
A
Cool
any
thoughts
on
carrot
or
anything
else
with
the
existing
boards
here.
A
Cool
yeah,
just
I,
think
we
talked
about
the
DC
holder
and
other
Outreach
already
I
think
this
is
another
opportunity
also
to
engage
a
wider
swath
of
rep
holders,
not
just
current
contributors
and
I
think
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
get
voter
participation
is
very,
very
important,
but
you
can't
you
have
to
yeah.
A
No,
it's
gonna
see
if
they
lead
the
horse
to
the
the
trough,
but
they
have
to
drink
it
themselves,
but
we
do
need
to
do
a
lot
of
leading
the
horse
to
the
trough
for
when
it
comes
not
just
DC
holders,
but
they
got
the
rep
holders
just
trying
to
like
LARP
our
way
into
more
active
governance
and
I.
Think
having
this
information
out
there
and
figuring
these
things
out
and
getting
wider
participated
is
a
yeah.
It's
like
an
ongoing
battle
and
discussion.
There.
D
Yes,
I
I
mean
I,
don't
know
if
we
can
offer
any
future
improvements,
but
then
it
would
be
super
nice
if
I'm
on
one-off,
like
let's,
let's
say,
for
instance,
for
voice
and
then
I
would
just
choose
numbers
for
different
signals
and
then
vote
once
I
I.
It
was,
it
was
too
cumbersome,
just
add
votes
and
then
I
have
I
have
to
rethink,
and
then
I
I
changed
the
number
and
then
I
have
to
vote
again.
And
then
it
just
takes
a
lot
of
time.
D
A
A
lot
of
voting
right
because
it's
six
points
and
that's
kind
of
it's
hard
to
get.
We
want
to
have
all
of
those
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
have
the
guilds
be
like
have
their
own
board
I.
Think
what
we
talked
about
before
we
were
like
saying
they
probably
needed
to
have
like
three.
Maybe
they
only
have
three
priorities
that
actually
have
signal
and
yeah
I
think
it's
you
know.
Maybe
people
only
go
to
the
geek
style
parties
board,
but
that's
that's!
That's
fine
too!
A
That's
a
start
there
and
then
I
think
just
affect
the
quite
the
kind
of
your
point.
Should
there
be
some
like
alignment
between
the
priorities
across
the
boards.
So
there
was
like
the
governance
2.0
priority
on
the
Deep
style
board,
but
does
that
line
up
I
guess
when
you
look
at
the
Duke's
gov
board,
it
was
actually
governance
2.0,
which
was
like
more
specific.
It
had
contracts
and
Davi
support.
A
So
should
that
be
like
consolidated
into
one
and
you
could
kind
of
see
how
that
priority
is
expressed
at
the
Dow
level
or
is
expressed
at
the
guild
level.
I
think
yeah
an
opportunity
there.
It'd
also
be
great
to
see
what
a
voter
voted
on
across
all
the
boards
right,
so
I
think
now,
if
you
look
at
it,
you
can
see
what
yeah
Diogo
did
on
this
one,
but
it
would
kind
of
be
good
to
see
what
he
had
done
on
all
of
the
other
ones.
D
A
A
Look
at
on-chain
or
on
chain
proposals.
They
can
only
be
yes
or
no
votes
right
and
that
just
comes
baked
into
Dow
stack
architecture.
And
so,
if
you
have
that
and
you
you
have
this
kind
of
very
informal
process
of
getting
to
a
soft
consensus
for
a
proposal
that
can
only
go
to
a
yes
or
no
vote.
And
you
know
we
sometimes
use
polls
through
Tao
talk
that
we
can.
A
We
can
have
but
I
think
having
like
another
way
of
using
that
to
form
that
soft
consensus
is
really
cool
and
it
might
just
be
a
very
be
a
way
of
a
more
expressive
way
of
governing
and
so
I
think
yeah.
It's
not
just
for
the.
A
Why
I
like
it
separate
from
using
it
like
a
proposal,
format
right,
which
kind
of
signals
a
certain
which
is
a
different
type
of
signal,
but
having
like
a
more
fluid
way
of
getting
that
signal
for
the
soft
consensus
before
going
to
the
proposal
phase.
A
Okay,
we
are
over
the
hour
and
I
think
I
probably
talked
for
50
minutes
us
so,
but
I
had
a
three-day
weekend
so
kind
of
a
little
bit
relaxed
cool.
Yes,
I'll
write
up
some
some
items
here,
Scott.
A
Maybe
we
can
chat
about
I,
don't
know
if
there's
like
another
update
or
kind
of
update,
like
the
main
balance,
but
I
think
we
could
kind
of
chat
a
little
bit
about
like
how
to
consolidate
some
of
these
things,
and
maybe
again,
that's
in
the
background
between
others,
I'm,
actually
probably
going
to
change
some
of
the
priorities
that
we
discussed
that
were
voted
on
before.
Based
on
this.
A
And
seeing
kind
of
how
some
of
the
priorities
have
have
attracted
different
others
and
so
yeah
I
think
that'll
be
a
takeaway
and
I
invite
anyone
to
also.
A
They
think
some
things
make
more
senses
priorities
there
and
yeah
and
I'm
curious,
we'll
see
about.
We
can
kind
of
read
more
about
the
the
snapshot
option
going
forward,
but
I
think
for
now.
It
makes
sense
to
kind
of
keep
using
this
and
iterating
on
this
and
ESP.
A
Awesome
thanks
everyone
for
joining
and
start
for
being
a
little
over
here
and
yeah.
Have
a
happy
Tuesday
see
you
on
tomorrow
on
the
governance
discussion.