►
From YouTube: DXdao Priorities Board Monthly Sync [2023-01-24]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
's
January
priorities
board
discussion.
The
first
such
discussion
here
I'm
going
to
share
a
screen
before
we
actually
get
into
that
or
no
yeah
here.
So
let
me
make
this
little
screen.
A
Okay,
I
guess
it's
not
as
big
as
it
could
be
so
just
kind
of
quick
run
view
of
agenda
so
where
things
stand
kind
of
what
this,
how
we
got
here
and
what
we're
kind
of
trying
to
do
with
this
new
initiative
app
demo,
so
Skye
has
been
talking
with
someone
and
working
on
something
kind
of
I.
Think
very.
It
would
be
really
helpful
to
be
able
to
run
this
kind
of
whole
initiative.
A
So
I
think
a
key
thing
that
we're
trying
to
do
with
the
priorities
board
is
reach
consensus
on
what
geek,
Style's
priorities
are
and
to
reach
consensus.
We
can't
just
like
talk
on
these
calls
and
come
to
some
agreement.
It's
you
have
to
vote
at
the
end
of
the
day
and
the
way
that
we
vote
with
geek
style
is
we
use
governance
power
on
governance
power
right
now
that
is
rep
the
future
that
I'll
be
rep
mdhd.
A
So
what
the
hopefully
we'll
get
to
in
a
little
bit
is
basically
a
demo
of
an
app
that
someone
is
working.
B
A
Allows
you
to
translate
like
on
chain
token
balances
or
rep
in
this
case
and
be
able
to
sign
weights
to
that,
so
that
you
could
then
do
ranked
Choice
voting
with
that.
A
So
we'll
kind
of
look
over
that
we're
hoping
maybe
we
could
have
a
demo
to
be
used
for
this
first
month,
but
if
not,
maybe
it
could
be
used
the
next
month
after
a
little
overview
of
like
what
the
voting
and
process
will
look
like
and
then
what
are
some
I
think
I
have
an
overview
of
what
it
what
it
is
and
maybe
then
there's
some
new
additions
and
then
looking
at
both
the
details,
priorities
overall
and
then
the
guild
priorities,
one
specifically
so
the
the
five
different
guilds
that
we
that
receive
funding
and
look
at
what
those
properties
are
and
then
just
kind
of
next
steps
from
from
here
and
I-
think
Under
The,
Guild
priorities,
discussion,
I,
think
Ross
from
Geek
Scott
has
some
ideas
on
how
to
like
execute
on
Deek
Style
on
deeksgov's
priorities
there.
A
So
we
can
talk
about
that
a
little.
So
this
is
the
beginning
that
could
have
been
a
quote.
This
is
yeah.
We're
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
have
a
new
thing
here
and
a
new
governance
structure,
so
we'll
take
some
time
to
figure
out,
and
so
when
things
need
time
to
be
figured
out,
I
like
to
use
my
my
favorite
saying
Mojo,
which
is
cross
the
river
by
feeling
the
stones.
A
So
we're
going
to
be
doing
that
again
here
where
we
are
I,
think
like
right
now,
I
think
if
you
go
back,
let's
say
pre-columbia,
so
you
know
before
Columbus
land,
no
before
Bogota
I
think
there
was.
You
know
we
have
these
priorities.
Maybe
there's
like
not
a
lot
of
clarity
but
I
think
going
through
that
process
and
then
like
going
through
some
of
the
restructuring
stuff
on
like
division,
but
also
I
think
a
lot
of
the
budget
stuff
where
we're
putting
forth
these
ideas
that
we
want.
We've.
A
Of
done
some
of
the
work
on,
maybe
where
some
of
the
priorities
are
now
and
I
think
that's
that's
helpful,
so
part
of
this
is
is
recognizing
that
but
I
imagine
this
is
not
just
something
for
right
now,
but
how
well
priorities
kind
of
change
into
the
future
and
I
guess
we
can
I'll
wait
for
this
app
demo,
just
kind
of
talk
about
what
we're
thinking
about
the
voting
and
process
here.
A
So,
as
I
said,
this
is
meant
to
be
like
a
monthly
update,
and
so
the
priorities
board
right
now,
as
we've
laid
it
out,
does
not
have
any
enforcement
element
to
it.
This
is
in
no
way
directive
to
any
individual
contributor
or
any
specific
Guild
to
be
like.
You
need
to
do
this
on
Monday
or
do
this
kind
of
on
Wednesday.
It
is
a
signal
from
dx.governance
on
what
it
sees
as
the
priorities
both
are
geeked
out
overall
and
the
individual
guilds.
A
So
all
we're
really
trying
to
do
right
now
is
provide
signal
and
then
it's
up
to
kind
of
the
guilds
themselves
to
execute
on
that
individual
contributors.
Obviously,
that
signal
will
come
in
handy
I.
Think
in
several
months,
when
we're
looking
at
budgets
for
the
second
half
a
year-
and
it
will
be
like
okay
well,
how
much
did
the
guild
output
align
with
the
priorities
that
were
established
at
the
time?
So
this
will
be
the
monthly
meeting
and
a
follow-up
summary
on
Dow
talk.
A
I'm
guessing
I
probably
will
not
try
to
do
the
monetary
policy
in
this
meeting
in
the
same
week,
but
we'll
figure
out
an
exact
time
and
try
to
get
it
the
same
same
time
of
a
month,
but
yeah
we'll
have
a
monthly
meeting
and
then
a
follow-up
summary
on
Dow
talk
for
those
that
are
a
little
bit
more
text
inclined
and
then
we
will
have
new
submissions.
A
So
if
there
are
new
priorities,
new
things
that
we
should
be
thinking
about
that
are
not
currently
on
the
board,
we'll
be
open
to
those
submissions
either
on
this
call
or
on
that
thread
for
two
days
after
the
meeting
and
we'll
get
to
how
we
implement
this.
But
the
idea
would
be,
you
could
be
a
new
submission
if
you
had
15
of
voting
power
in
this
case,
reputation
behind
it
and
then
we'll
have
a
bit
of
time
here
for
discussion.
A
So
it'll
be
seven
days
after
here
when
the
actual
rank
vote
will
take
place,
and
so
now
the
idea
is
we
discuss
a
little
bit
here,
there's
two
days
for
new
submissions
and
then
basically,
five
days
for
people
to
you
know
maybe
discuss
things
on
the
Forum,
maybe
think
about
things
a
little
bit
more
before
that's
actually
put
put
to
vote
and
so
yeah.
A
This
is
what
we're
kind
of
thinking
now
five
days
vote,
and
then
from
that
again
you
have
some
signal
of
this
is
what
diet
is
prioritizing
right
now
and
then
we
just
kind
of
do
the
same
process.
A
You
know
three
weeks
later
so
hopefully
this
is,
you
know,
comes
routine
a
little
bit
and
there
are
a
lot
of
things
that
are
the
same
every
month
and
we're
really
focusing
on
really
only
like
the
changes
to
certain
things
and
I'm
thinking
like
say,
governance,
2.0
or
some
of
the
the
other
things
like
those
are
pretty.
We
don't
really
need
to
discuss
that
much
about
these.
A
D
I,
don't
know
where
he
went,
but
I
can
also
talk
about
it,
high
level
and
a
few
thoughts
about
it.
If
you
want
me
to
do
that
now
or
yes,.
D
Yeah
yeah,
that
I
mean
that's,
that's
yeah.
You
can
show
that
as
a
as
a
thing
but
I'm
gonna,
I'm,
just
gonna
kind
of
overview,
explain
it
because
it
also
relates
to
what
you
just
talked
about
there.
So
this
app
this
was
just
a
I
was
just
looking
at
the
comments.
This
is
just
a
like
a
a
test
instance
of
it,
the
idea
of
it
being
used
for
something
else
for
testing,
but
the
idea
of
this
this
app
that
we
want
to
use
for
our
priorities.
D
All
here
use
chord
tape
and
then
we
also
some
people
might
know
what
conviction
voting
is
and
so
coordinate
is
like,
usually
a
snapshot
in
time
like
we
all
participate,
and
then
we
get
a
snapshot
and
we
take
some
action
based
on
the
snapshot
of
that
in
in
this
app,
it's
going
to
be
more
like
I,
don't
know
if
you've
seen
Gardens
by
one
Hive
but
conviction
voting
is
people
have
a
certain
amount
of
power,
and
so
this
power
is
probably
going
to
be
determined
by
your
your
rep
that
you
hold
and
then
it
can
also
be
determined
by
people
that
have
DxD
that
would
like
to
participate
in
in
this
priorities,
ranking
as
well
and
so
I
floated
a
come,
some
rough
formulas
for
how
to
determine
a
voting
power
based
on
your
rep
or
your
DxD,
in
in
the
operations
Guild
and
also
in
the
DX
gov,
because
there's
a
lot
of
things
related
to
like
how
this
could
tie
into
Davi
and
DX
gov
and
governance
in
general.
D
So
everyone
everyone,
that's-
that
wants
to
be
a
stakeholder
in
priorities
board
which
is
you're
either
rep,
holder
or
you're.
D
A
DxD
holder
that
wants
to
participate
you're
going
to
have
some
amount
of
voting
power
and
we
would
have
a
list
of
the
priorities
and
people
could
add
new
priorities
if
they
want,
but
on
a
on
like
a
a
live
basis
for
like
some
period
of
time,
so
we
could
either
do
it
on
a
monthly
basis
or
even
the
quarterly
basis
you
get
to
assign
your
voting
power
divide
it
up
between
the
priorities
that
are
that
you
think
VX
style
should
focus
on
the
most
and
it
actually
is
a
live.
D
It's
a
live,
always
continuous
voting
mechanism.
So
if,
at
any
time,
if
you
decide
that
other
priorities
can
move
higher,
you
can
actually
then
adjust
your
power,
that's
flowing
towards
those
initiatives,
and
so
not
only
does
it
allow
us
to
have
snapshots
at
points
in
time.
It
allows
you
to
see
how
that
changes
over
time,
so
throughout,
like
the
month
or
throughout
the
quarter.
D
This
yeah,
this
screenshot,
is
an
example
so
of
of
actual
amounts
getting
yeah
getting
voting
power
Associated
to
them,
and
then
you
can
rank
it
by
the
total
TBS
I
guess,
which
is
like
total
value
score
and
that
will
show
like
the
then
current.
So
it
does
take
into
account.
You
know,
let's
see,
people
keep
joining
I'm
just
looking.
If
Lewis
is
chatting,
you
don't
know
where
he
went.
I
talked
to
him
like
an
hour
ago
and
told
him
to
show
up,
but
he's.
D
A
D
Yeah,
so
this
is
actually
a.
This
is
like
an
old
version
of
it.
It's
been
fully
redone
and
is
a
lot
better
than
this
I
think
we
should
be
able
to
start
testing
or
using
it
at
this
week.
At
some
point,
there's
just
like
some
finishing
touches
being
done
on
it,
so
this
I
think
it's
going
to
look
quite
a
bit
different
than
this,
but
that's
the
that's.
D
The
idea
of
this
tool,
I
think
if
DX
Dao
starts
to
use
it
in,
you
know,
I
think
it's
going
to
be
an
effective
way
to
determine
priorities.
D
There
is
at
in
the
beginning,
we
will
have
kind
of
admins
just
like
we
do
with
coordinate
admins
that
help
set
it
up,
but
eventually
you
can
you'd
be
able
to
like
pull
in
rep
and
pull
in
DxD
automatically
into
a
system.
That
would
then
give
you
live
holding
power
and
at
some
point
maybe
this
becomes
yeah.
This
could
be
like
almost
a
Dap
or
a
widget
within
Dobby,
or
something
like
that
as
well.
So
it's
a
I
think
it's
a
tool
that
if
DXL
starts
using,
we
can
give
feedback
they
can.
D
They
can
make
changes
that
we
think
make
it
better
and
it
actually
could
become.
It
starts
driving.
You
know
where
a
big
Unchained
Dao
is
focusing
its
attention.
I
think
that
actually
becomes
an
interesting
tool
for
other
communities
to
use
as
well,
and
so
we
can
be
one
of
the
first
to
to
experiment
with
it.
Yeah.
A
A
It
was
down
here
at
50
and
so
it
just
kind
of
moved
up,
and
so
obviously
these
are
different
things,
but
we
would
have
basically
like
one
of
these
four
deaked
out
and
then
hopefully
we
do
one
of
these
for
each
of
the
guilds
and
then
you
presumably
have
kind
of
cross
the
same
voting
power
across
them,
but
it
would
be
yeah,
I.
Think
a
healthy.
C
B
A
Yeah
I
mean
a
lot
of
things.
We
say
about
dog
feeding,
Geeks
down,
building
other
tooling
I
think
this
is
a
would
be
a
very
effective
I,
think
Dow,
tooling,
and
maybe
be
used
by
by
others.
I
know
like
a
lot
of
like
maker,
obviously
signals
a
lot
with
polling,
but
there's
a
lot
of
other
I
think
opportunities.
There.
A
Cool,
let
me
get
off
of
this
one
and
go
back
to
the
slides.
A
A
Cool
all
right,
so
then
geek
style
heard
his
discussion.
So
this
is
where
I
don't
we
have
the
first
version.
I
guess
of
this
thing,
this
board
here
and
yeah
I
think
I
have
talked
to
people
about.
B
A
But,
of
course,
I,
don't
think
I
have
there's
been
no
voting
process
on
this,
so
this
is
in
nowhere
official.
But
when
you
start
these
things,
they
do
need
to
have
something
in
kind
of
an
order
ordering
here
and
so
yeah
I
guess
just
to
kind
of,
like
briefly
touch
on
what
I
we
kind
of
again.
A
I
think
these
are
maybe
even
more
consensus
of
what
things
are,
maybe
than
even
my
individual
opinions
but
I'm
again
happy
to,
and
you
can
quibble
with
a
lot
of
these,
so
I
still
think
like
the
Deep
style
top
overall
priority
is
governance.
2.0
I,
think
that
involves
a
lot
of
different
things.
A
I
think
you
could
really
put
even
some
of
the
stuff
I
think
with
the
token
working
group
actually
end
up
under
that
one
too,
because
it
really
is
just
about
like
unifying
that
there's
a
new
DHD
token
model
implementation,
which
I
think
has
been
a
huge
priority
over
the
last
a
month
or
so
and
then
developing
a
flagship
product,
vision
and
Mission
this.
A
This
is
coming
out
of
the
restructuring
and
refocus
proposal
and
kind
of
driving
that
and
we
have
a
Davey
Davi,
sorry,
internal
and
external
kind
of
splitting
those
up
a
little
bit
and
we
just
kind
of
go
through
the
products
right
here
you
know:
Davi
internal
Dobby,
external
carrot,
swapper
front
end.
We
split
that
one
up
a
little
bit
because
things
a
little
bit
more
focused
on
the
kind
of
the
front
end
again.
This
is
from
the
Dows
perspective
here.
A
Recruiting
I
think
is
a
priority.
We've
actually
done,
I
think
a
good
job
of
filling
in
that
already
and
I
think
there's
a
lot
more.
We
can
do
and
there's
a
big
opportunity
in
this
same
bull:
market
I'm.
Sorry
in
this
bear
Market
to
to
build
up
and
attract
some
great
talent.
A
Community
outreach
always
a
priority
financial
reporting.
I
think
maybe
this
kind
of
ties
a
little
bit
in
the
DxD
model
implementation.
So
it
could
probably
actually
maybe
think
about
it,
drop
off
this,
but
then
yeah
just
some
other
things
on
here.
That
I
think
are
geek
style.
A
Overall
organizational
improvements,
swapper
like
the
on-chain
element,
a
little
bit
there
and
again.
Maybe
one
of
these
is
moving
up
into
this.
This
tenth
one.
Now
that
I
think
about
it
token,
holder,
Outreach
I,
think
we've
kind
of
improved
on,
but
it
is
something
we're
actually
like
focusing
on
and
getting
getting
them
more
involved,
dext
out
branding
as
well.
That's
something
maybe
that's
that's
not
a
top
priority
there
and
then
I
guess
before
we
like
maybe
talk
about
those
for
a
little
bit.
I
just
want
to
like
draw
your
attention.
A
We
will
talk
about
these
in
a
second,
but
like
the
there
is
a
relationship
between.
We
have
DX
down
priorities
and
Guild
priorities.
So
I
guess
the
question
is
like:
do
they
need
to
like
perfectly
overlap
or
how
much
should
they
kind
of
play
off
of
each
other
I
think
they
are
very
much
like
at
least
important
signals
that
dxdowell
will
want
to
have
have
a
it's
like
a
is
a
good
thing
so
that
you
it's
less
about
an
enforcement
or
something
that
needs
to
be
kind
of
acted
upon.
A
It's
more
about
like
the
signal
that
can
be
interpreted
by
different
groups.
I
think
the
key
thing
is
they
probably
shouldn't
conflict
that
much
right.
You
shouldn't
say
that
this
is
a
priority
for
jigs
now,
but
it's
not
a
priority
for
a
guild.
A
But
again
that's
going
to
be
how
the
vote
ends
up
happening,
but
I
think
we
don't
really
need
to
make
any
harder
fast
rules
about
it,
but
just
know
that
there
is
some
relate.
There
is
like
some
relationship
between
the
two
and
we
want
to
be
voting
on
kind
of
how
those
go
there.
A
A
I,
don't
think
we
want
to
get
into
it
this
one's
a
little
bit
higher
than
that
one
of
this
one's
a
lot
a
little
bit
higher
than
that
one
I
think
some
of
that
is
dependent
on
like
how
we
end
up
voting
but
I
think.
Is
there
any
yeah
big
omissions,
or
maybe
things
that
we
want
to
reword,
is
another
thing
like
what
exactly
kind
of
are
these
things
that
are
important
but
yeah?
Any
initial
reactions
to
the
DX
Dao
version,
foreign.
A
We
can
go
into
the
individual
ones
in
a
second
that
we've
put
together.
A
A
Maybe
care
is
a
little
bit
higher
between
these
or
kind
of
there,
but
you
can
kind
of
just
see
like
all
the
products
our
year
as
top
priorities,
but
these
are
kind
of
key
things
that
are
like
you
know,
geeked
out
across
cross-wide
there
and
so
I
think
just
going
to
read,
c-man
see
Mandy
three
and
it
says
I
think
the
DxD
model
implementation
plays
heavily
into
other
priorities
as
well.
A
Solidifying.
The
new
model
governance
ties
directly
into
that
model.
The
community
will
be
more
in
tune
with
the
new
token
model
as
well.
We
can
see
the
influx
of
personalities
having
to
save.
What's
going
on
with
the
new
model,
increases
governance,
discussion,
lots
of
different
things,
he
says
he's
just
spitballing
there,
also
on
a
Mini
phone,
yeah
and
I.
A
Think
that's
you
know
a
good
say,
byproduct
of
the
model
that
it
does
introduce
like
new
stakeholder
incentive
alignment,
so
I
think
just
having
more
DHD
holders
interested
in
what's
actually
happening
with
product
development
is
very
important
and
I.
Think
you
only
get
that
when
you
have
this
like
close
tie
between
you
know
what
the
rep
holders
contributors,
but
the
treasury
and
what
dxt
holders
have
have
access
to
so
I
think
that
is
yeah,
a
good
byproduct
for
that,
and
also.
B
A
Cool
yeah
and
then
looking
at
the
operations
one
we
have.
Let's
do
this
here
enact
we're
structuring,
refocus
proposal.
Shout
out
you
can
check
my
Twitter
retweets.
There
is
a
great
medium
or
I
think
a
medium
article
and
also
dial
talk
post
from
Keenan
at
the
end
of
last
week,
kind
of
reviewing
where
the
statuses
of
everything
on
that
and
I
think
really
as
operations
go
like
that's.
A
One
of
the
top
priorities
is
really
just
kind
of
getting
that
set
up
and
you
can
kind
of
see
where
we,
where
we
are
on
that
I
think
from
the
operations
Guild
side,
there's
really
like
three
components
to
that.
There's
the
budget
which
we've
passed
the
and
kind
of
opened
at
the
first
half
2023
one.
A
Then
there's
this
priorities
board
which
we're
talking
about
now
and
then
the
third
element
is
the
DHD
monetary
policy
committee
that
were
kind
of
made
on
on
Thursday
on
that
now
related
to
that
I
think
executing
on
the
new
DHD
token
model
and
I
think
there
has
you
know
it's
been
some
activity,
but
I
think
it's
there's
been
a
lot
of
progress.
I!
Think
on
that,
in
the
last
couple
weeks
and
I
think
it's
okay
to
recognize
that
the
output
of
that
discussion
argument,
whatever
we
want
to
call.
A
It
was
I,
think
a
very
effective
governance,
move
and
decision,
and
a
very
big
one,
I
guess
in
terms
of
the
the
the
member
balancers
that
have
gone
through
something
as
a
similar
there's
about
3.5
million
member
dollar
member
balancer
that
went
through
last
week
and
there's
about
two
million
dollars
worth
of
member
balancers
that
are
set
to
go
through
I.
Think
this
week.
I
have
not.
B
A
A
chance
to
look
and
verify
all
them,
but
I
think
Dave
has
voted
on
them
and
they
quickly
look
good
to
me
so
I
think
the
that's
kind
of
like
the
first
initial
executing
on
the
on
the
new
dxt
token
model
and
I
think
that
takes
yes,
I'm
overhead
in
doing
that,
and
then
yeah
there
are
a
couple
different
other
ways
of
executing
on
that.
A
There's
been
about
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
more
of
Zeke's
style
liquidity
that
has
been
put
into
swapper
for
the
DxD
West
pair
there.
So
that
gives
instant
liquidity
to
anyone
through
that
as
well,
and
then
yeah
the
next
one.
We've
had
a
lot
of
I
guess,
there's
only
I
think
there's
three
types
of
cow
swap
orders
right.
This
is
really
cool,
we're
kind
of
experimenting
that
but
the
big
one
that
we've
we
have
now
so
we
have.
A
You
have
the
limit
order
which
you
can
do
is
set
on
on
that
and
then
the
second
one
you
have
is
you
can
basically
do
like
a
market
buy.
So
you
can
buy
anything
at
that
one.
But
we
just
started
this
liquidity
order,
order
type,
which
basically
allows
you
to
have
a
limit
order,
but
it's
not
a
limit
order.
That's
fill
or
kill,
meaning
it
will
be.
A
You
could
access
it
for
days
after
that,
there's
one
that
is
live
right
now
that
was
put
five
hundred
thousand
dollars,
unfortunately,
was
put
at
like
1300
if
prices,
so
it
is
I,
think
buying
at
like
586
dollars
of
the
D
of
DxD,
so
that
has
not
been
picked
up
at
all.
There
is,
but
it's
still
on
the
books,
I
guess
for
another,
a
couple
couple
days
there.
So
if
youth
drops
or
DC
kind
of
someone
wants
to
sell
a
lot,
you
could
access
that
liquidity
order.
A
There
is
another
liquidity
order
for
400
weft.
That
is
currently
I,
think
it's
three
days
away
from
passing
now.
So,
unlike
the
usdc
order,
which
it
moves,
a
lot
based
upon
the
the
the
price
of
eth,
the
eth
order,
I
think
was
at
like
point
four
four
two
point:
four
four
two
or
something
so
that
will
be
a
very
big
order
that
well
I,
think
yeah
that'll
kind
of
probably
be
the
largest
single
order,
I
think
of
dxt
that
you've
seen
so
far
and
that's
kind
of
there.
A
The
inverse
bonds,
the
other
Ross,
G
and
I
have
been
chatting
about
this
a
lot
this
week
and
kind
of
what
that
means
for
the
model
and
how
we
can
kind
of
like
incorporate
that
I
think
there
is
still
a
little
bit
of
like
thinking
on
the
policy
side
or
like
what
are
we
actually
trying
to
encourage
and
grow
and
like?
How
does
this
action
actually
feed
into
and
help
improve
the
products,
help
these
stakeholders
and
kind
of
whatever
I
think?
A
A
How
to
optimize
that
so
you
have,
maybe
people
that
are
more
bullish
on
geek
style,
want
to
take
like
a
bigger
risk
or
in
some
way
these
inverse
bonds
are
an
opportunity
that
they
can
kind
of
like
potentially
get
a
higher
return
by
both
like
locking
up
their
GXT
for
a
while,
but
maybe
also
taking
a
bet
on
the
treasury
in
some
way.
So
we
are
going
to
provide
an
update
on
that
on
on
Thursday
on
the
DHT
monetary
policy
committee
meeting.
A
Why
don't
we
just
go
through
these
operations
and
then
we'll
do
it
like
so
like
two
minutes?
If
that's
cool,
so
you've
got
to
think
that's
kind
of
like
you
know,
government
stuff,
and
then
you
have
like
you
know,
treasury
stuff
and
we
have
and
the
other
thing
we
actually
have
in
terms
of
like.
A
Contributor
X,
so
I
think
having
solidity
that
is
incredibly
important.
I
think
it's
a
major
priority.
Probably
you
know
the
top
priority
of
contributor
X
Squad,
and
so
we
have
that
and
they're.
Also
looking
for
a
treasury
manager
kind
of
been
chatting
about
that
and
on
kind
of
what
that
looks
like
this
week,
there's
been
a
lot
of
applicants.
Both
individuals
and
entities
that
have
applied
or
interested
in
so
I
think
that's
something
we
want
to
figure
out
how
we'll
how
we'll
do
that
going
forward.
A
So
that's
something
then
we
have
you
know
we
want
to
flesh
out
the
idea
of
this
legal
Squad
and
the
devops
and
security
Squad
and
make
that
a
little
bit
more
of
a
real
thing,
with
yarick
and
Augusto
on
that
I
think
a
priority
of
the
operations
Guild,
which
maybe
not
as
much
as
as
maybe
the
other
ones
is
like
I,
think
the
operation
skill
is
now.
Maybe
the
only
one
that
has
responsibility
for
like
weekly
calls.
A
So
you
have
yeah,
that's
a
somewhat
big
priority
there
so
about
the
developer,
one,
and
also
the
governance
one
there
and
then
just
some
other
things
to
be
thinking
about
here.
Treasury
deployment
is
that
something
that
we
want
to
prioritize?
We
want
to
get
the
treasury
doing
more
things
in
different
areas.
A
That's
something
that
can
be
acted
on.
Contributor,
onboarding,
I
think
it's
always
like
a
priority,
but
maybe
not
like
enough
of
one
and
then
looking
at
you
know.
Stakeholder
risk
analysis
is
just
an
example
of
something
maybe
that
the
legal
Squad
could
look
into
a
little
bit
in
looking
at
one
of
the
risks
to
different
stakeholders
in
the
Deep
Stout
ecosystem.
A
So
yeah
I
don't
know
if
there
are
any
questions
on
that
there
or
comments.
We
could
turn
it
over
to
to
Lewis
for
for
a
demo
here.
If
there
aren't
any.
D
Cool
sweet
I'll,
just
introduce
Lewis
Lewis
is
a
contributor
to
a
bunch
of
stuff
in
the
space
and
kind
of
a
hacker
he
used
to
do
a
bunch
with
d
org,
but
he
is
floats
around
the
space
and
he
he
and
a
couple.
Others
came
up
with
this
idea.
I
think
this
past
summer,
Lewis
just
I
I
described
it
high
level.
You
can
see
here,
like
you
know,
DX
Dao
and
the
the
different
guilds
has
have
different
priorities
which
are
unranked
right
now.
D
Everyone
here
is
also
familiar
with
coordinate
and
also
has
some
knowledge
about
conviction,
voting
and
I
kind
of
explained
how
this
news
priorities.
Ranking
system
is
a
mix
of
all
those
things
but,
and
we
actually
just
shared
like
the
the
old
version
of
what
it
looked
like
that
was
tested
out
during
December,
but
it
would
be
awesome
if
you
could
show
yeah
talk
through
the
latest
and
then
show
anything
you
have
that
might
interest
the
people.
E
Yeah
I
think
you
know,
that's
a
pretty.
You
know
pretty
good
summation
in
the
intro,
and
you
know
this
project
just
started
off
as
a
little
hack
at
this
Dao
Gathering
like
residency.
We
were
at
you
know
the
idea
being
you
know,
could
we
kind
of
dog
food
something
at
the
time
to
better
capture
our
own,
like
internal,
like
preferences
and
signaling,
and
coordinate
our
own
behaviors
right
over
the
like
one
or
two
week
period
that
we
were?
E
So
that's
probably
what
you
saw
or
interacted
with
before
was
that
first
iteration,
which
was
a
much
more
simple
like
smart
contract
right.
That's
essentially
just
like
capturing
your
you
know.
You
have
like
a
thousand
points
and
then
those
points
get
allocated
towards
like
a
topic
indexed
by
a
string
and
then
that's
kind
of
like
unchain
capturing.
E
You
know
preferences
that
way
and
then,
when
I
got
a
small
Grant
to
continue
building
it
and
then
like
picking
up
some
ideas
from
zargum
at
the
time
and
learning
about
more
like
composable,
celebrity
Frameworks,
I
was
thinking
of
the
notion
like.
Could
we
make
this
like
very
like
how
modular
how
composable
can
we
make
this?
Can
we
make
that
into
a
thing
where
you
you
know,
can
like
reuse
all
the
components?
E
Can
we
make
this
into
a
thing
where
you
can
like
deploy
at
every
level
your
own,
like
your
own
components,
right
of.
B
E
Know
who's
allowed
to
Signal,
like
you
know,
in
a
particular
instance,
who's
allowed
to
you
know
like
how
many
points
everyone
has
or
like
how
that's
determined,
like
any
of
that
logic,
essentially
just
kind
of
like
wired,
together
a
state
machine
right
for
for
this
type
of
signaling,
which
is
you
know,
also
extensible
to
even
let's
say,
like
treasury
management
token,
you
know
token
curated,
Registries
and
so
forth.
E
So
I
think
moves
like
smoothly
between
kind
of
this
idea
of
soft
social,
signaling
and
preferences
right
within
an
organization
and
then
potentially
even
like
integrating
with
like
treasury
management
and
other.
Like
automated
processes,
you
know
based
on
results
of
these
systems.
E
So,
let's
see
I
can
maybe
the
best
thing
I
could
do
is
because
I
think
you
just
saw
like
the
old
front
ends
working
with
then
and
we're
gonna
redeploy
like
the
new
contract
system
into
a
new
front
end
or
by
like
today
or
tomorrow,
so
it'd
be
useful
to
get
like
your
guys
feedback
on,
perhaps
like
exactly
what
type
of
like
mechanism
might
work
for
your
organization.
E
So
but
I
guess
the
last
thing
I'll
show
you
is
maybe
like
a
short
wire
diagram
of
like
how
everything's
stitched
together
and
hopefully
that
makes
it
a
bit
more
clear.
Okay,.
E
E
So
there
we
go
so
yeah
and
I
built
this
using
the
mud
framework
which,
if
anyone's
heard
of
it,
is
for
like
on-chain
gaming,
but
it's
very
useful
for
like
just
like
a
general
composable,
State,
Management
Systems,
and
for
that
and
and
that's
where,
like
the
really
interesting
part
of
like
being
able
to
wire
together,
like
the
logic
of
your,
what
I
call
a
signal
stream
right.
This
is
stream
is
like
an
abstraction
for
like
a
single
instance.
E
E
Outside
of
this
scope,
it's
more
like
admin
of
like
okay.
What
like
you
own
stream,
one
right
like
or
anyone
can
just
claim
a
you
know:
uint
256,
as
whatever
stream
that
they
want,
but
then
there's
they
have
their
admin
privileges.
They
could
say.
Okay,
you
can
call
these
top
level
systems,
meaning
that,
like
in
the
context
of
the
stream,
here's
like
the
permissible
functions.
You
can
call
here's
the
permissible
functions
that
can
update
component
State
and,
like
here's,
the
here's,
how
we
determine
our
like
user
membership.
E
E
You
know
custom
configured
and
then
once
configured
like
reused
over
and
over
again
without
having
to
deploy
any
new
contracts
by
like
making
all
of
these
lookups
and
then
like
at
every
step
of
the
way,
making
sure
that
you
know
people
are,
you
know
within
the
scope
of
the
stream
registered
to
Signal
and
again,
like
even
the
the
scope
of
the
signal
is
like
arbitrary
and
like
components
can
be
made,
and
the
components
are
simply
like
very
simple,
like
State
Storage
contracts
on
chain
and
store
a
particular
type
of
State,
and
then-
and
this
is
like
in
the
context
of
the
mud
framework,
all
events
get
emitted
as
bytes
and
then
the
components
have
a
have
a
schema
that
allow
you
to
know
how
to
decode
right
any
particular
event.
E
So,
but
you
only
need
one
subgraph
to
listen
to
like
all
of
the
events
from
all
of
the
streams
and
then
to
have
to
like
decode
them
for
like
any
particular
stream.
So
that's
kind
of
like
the
big
idea.
It's
like.
Okay,
we'll
start
and,
like
you
know
this.
The
first
use
case
will,
you
know,
be
quite
as
simple.
E
As
you
know,
what
you've
been
seeing
in
terms
of
okay,
we're
going
to
like
everyone,
has
like
a
certain
amount
of
points
in
this
case,
maybe
we're,
like
you
know,
hard
coded
based
on
you
know
like
admins,
who,
like
determine
okay,
this
these
users
have
this
many
points
and
then
play
with
that.
But
the
idea
is,
you
know
it's
very
easy
to
like
mutate
without
having
to
redeploy
like
a
significant
amount
of
like
front-end,
back-end
and
contract
infrastructure.
E
Like
change
the
rules,
you
know
add
new
logic
you
make
it
like
quadratic
make
it
hit
up
a
dow
contractor,
like
anything
in
between
and
kind
of,
permissionlessly
allow
you
to
like
Stitch
these
instances
together
and
then,
of
course,
like
there's
nothing
stopping
this
system,
also
from
like
plugging
into
Logic
for.
E
D
Last
thing
you
just
said:
Lewis
quite
futuristic
like
this
priority
boards
determining
the
priorities
of
which
guilds
those
come
from
and
then
like
the
money
streaming
out
of
DX
Dao
into
those
guilds
on
a
live
basis
based
on
the
live
voting
power
allocation
is,
is
really
cool,
but
we
don't
need
that.
E
E
Yeah
I
get
I
think
what's
what's
really
cool
about
kind
of
you
know
the
the
affordances
inherited
from
this
like
mud
architecture
here,
is
like
because
it's
so
compartmentalized
and
you
look
at
it
and
it's
like
oh
wow.
Why
are
we
like
doing
12?
You
know
like
contract,
calls
to
update
a
state
variable
and
granted.
You
know
that
could
probably
be
like
compressed
down
considerably,
and
you
know
this
is
definitely
something
that's
like
much
better
to
operate
on,
let's
say
like
nose
chain
where
it
still
costs.
E
You
know
like
less
than
a
penny
per
per
transaction
but
yeah,
but
essentially
that
that
modularity
and
composability
extends
itself
to
like
yeah
like
reuse
across,
like
all
levels
of
the
stack
to
the
point
where
you
know.
E
If,
with
enough
components,
you
know
in
like
existing
contract
system,
like
logic
and
component
Stores,
you
can
even
just
say
like
okay,
here's
what
I
want
my
stream
to
look
like,
and
maybe
it's
like
a
wire
diagram
right
of
like
okay,
like
people
can
do
this
and
then,
like
the
contracts,
updates,
stay
in
this
way
and
blah
blah
blah.
And
this
is
how,
like
we
determine
every
part
of
that,
and
then
that,
like
wire
diagram,
would
just
be
like
imminently
interfacing,
with
like
the
structure
of
the
back
end
yeah.
E
A
So
Lewis,
so
the
and
I
was
just
using
the
demo
a
little
bit
before,
and
so
is.
Is
that
all
on
chain,
because
when
I
was
using,
the
demo
I
was
like
sending
a
transaction
to
gnosis
chain,
and
so
like
I
guess.
Is
that
even
that
calculation
of
the
voting
power
happening
on
chain
or
is
that
what
the
is
is
just
what's
happening
on
chain
is
like
the
I
just
like
gave
a
hundred
thumbs
up
to
one
and
50
thumbs
up
to
remember
so
just
that
information
is
stored
on
chain.
B
E
A
Very
cool
who
knew
priorities
board
monthly
meeting
you'd
be
getting
a
sweet
technical
overview,
but
yeah
that's
awesome
and
I
guess
like
we
were
I
mean
we're
still.
As
I
said.
This
is
something
we
want
to
do
every
month
and
like
we're
trying
to
build
a
process
on
it
so
we're
this
is
the
first
month
of
it,
but
we
are
yeah
kind
of
in
it
for
we
think
for
the
Long
Haul
here
so
I'm,
hoping
to
like
start
voting
like
one
week
from
now,
and
so
for
that.
A
What
we
would
one
is
that
we
would
actually
have
like
actually
six
different
boards,
one
for
Geek
style
overall
and
then
five
different
mini
boards.
They
would
have
the
same
voting
power
like
breakdown,
so
you
each
address
would
have
the
same
amount
of
voting
power
regardless
of
the
board,
but
you
would
have
different
amounts
to
give
per
per
board
and
so
yeah
that's
what
we
were
kind
of
hoping
I.
A
Don't
know
if
we'd
be
able
to
do
that
in
a
week,
or
maybe
we
could
look
for
for
next
month,
but
yeah
I
think
this
is
you
know
a
lot
of
the
things
we're
looking
for
and
I
just
think
polling
and
signaling
is
like
so
huge
is
like
kind
of
an
unsolved
problem.
Ooh
look
at
that.
E
Yeah,
so
if
you're
talking
about
like
for
what
I
understood
your
needs
are
like,
you
want
essentially
now
kind
of
like
the
same
voting
schema
more
or
less
or
like
the
system
is
set
up
in
the
same
way.
But
you
want
like
multiple,
independent
instances
that
maybe
like
have
different
permissions
or
is
like
mutated
in
a
different
way.
If
I
understand
correctly.
A
Probably
the
only
difference
would
be,
they
need
to
have
their
own
independent,
like
currency
right,
and
they
would
need
to
have
their
own
individual
signals.
So
you'd,
basically
just
have
six
different
boards
where
your
ranking
things,
but
the
like.
The
people
who
could
vote
on
those
even
like
the
admins,
whatever
those
could
be
the
same.
It's
only
like
the
voters
will
have
the
same
voting
power,
but
just
across
different
different
boards.
C
D
A
E
Right
and
again
so
yeah
I
think
that's
kind
of
another
like
great
value
out
of
this
type
of
architecture,
so
you
can
just
like
reuse.
Let's
say
in
this
case
you
want
to
reuse
the
same
like
member
registry
right
so
like.
C
E
This
is
where
again,
it's
kind
of
like
you
know,
a
process
of
like
experimentation
and
kind
of
thinking
about
and
playing
with,
like
what
you
really
want
right
and
so
I
would
even
say,
like
you
know,
right,
try
to
write
down
explicitly
or
even
like
diagram,
how
you
think
you
know
you,
you
want
these
systems
to
work,
because
those
could
be
like
these
ideas
could
be
more
or
less
like
easily
integrated.
If
you
are
like
okay
well,
you
know
we
only
you
know
on
this
one
on
the
current
board.
E
E
So,
like
thinking
like
that,
so
in
this
first
iteration
yeah,
it's
like
open
anyone
can
you
know
signal
something
and
like
add
points
and
remove
points
and
you'll
be
able
to
see
that
coming
here
in
the
front
end,
but
but
yeah
any
additional
logic
or
like
features
I'd
say
just
like
make
a
note
of
them,
because
that's
kind
of
like
the
whole
point
of
this
I,
don't
know
the
architecture
is
like
making
it
easy
to
upgrade
and
experiment
with.
A
E
And
yeah
I
think
like
it's.
It's
definitely
it's.
It's
already
set
up
for
like
new
instances.
So
like
yes,
like
all
the
contracts
are
built
to
do
it
in
a
certain
way
where
you
know
everyone,
like
you
know,
like
references,
this
hard-coded
registry
of,
like
you
know,
address
you
know
you
every
address
has
a
certain
amount
of
points
that
you
determine
beforehand,
but
in
that
framework
I
like
once
this
is
up
you
could
spin
up.
E
You
know
like
an
arbitrary
number
of
of
instances
of
that
and
then,
when
there's
like
more
systems
right
that
plug
into
the
architecture,
you
could
start
to
spin
up
instances
of
those.
C
D
A
Iterate
on
this
and
kind
of
yeah.
E
And
and
yeah,
let
me
know
if
so
I
could
I
could
deploy
this
on
right
now,
it's
on
Gorly!
E
You
know,
if
you
wanna
do
this
like
first
one
you
know
within
the
next
week
on
gnosis
chain
or
Gorly
like.
Let
me
know
if
you
have
a
preference
either
way
on
that.
A
Yeah,
we'll
yeah.
D
C
D
C
B
D
E
And
so
so,
yeah
again,
like
I
made
it
this.
You
know
this.
You
know,
member
points
registry
is
like
very
simple
and
again
it's
like
a
you
know,
modular
component,
that
at
you
know
some
point
could
be
easily
swapped
out
right,
but
we're
just
like
adding
literally
just
an
array.
You
know
you
know
if,
if
you're
a
valid
stream
owner,
which
is
part
of
like
the
stream
abstraction
right,
you
like
register
the
stream
or
admin
whatever.
Then
you
on
that
stream,
you
just
call
like
add
users.
E
You
know
with
like
an
array
of
users,
an
array
of
points
and
doing
like
a
one-time
update.
You
know
for
for
any
number
of
users.
C
E
C
E
Again
so
there's
like
small
design
considerations
like
you
know
this,
and
this
does
not
allow
you
to
like
modify
points
right
for
users
that
you
already
submit
to
again.
That
would
be
like
another
design
consideration
and
just
like
keeping
keeping
these
things
in
mind
of
like
okay,
how
you
want
these
systems
to
work
and
like
tweaking
the
internals
I
think
is
how
you
get
like
the
most
value
out
of
it:
cool.
D
E
A
Thanks
Louis
for
I
want
to
see.
Hopefully
we
can
finish
before
at
the
top
of
the
hour,
so
I
want
to
keep
things.
It's
really
excited
that
we
can
yeah.
I
think
this
is
exactly
the
the
type.
C
A
Dow,
tooling,
that
we're
kind
of
looking
for
that
I
think
is
yeah
matches
up
with
what
a
dow
actually
needs,
signaling
and
and
voting,
and
very
cool
and
also
kind
of
a
preview
of
little
government,
gov
2.0
right,
seeing
how
you
can
have
DHD
and
reputation,
contribute
to
the
same
voting
power
and
go
to
make
decisions
so
I
think
it's
a
great
way
of
kind
of
getting
us
started
on
that
road
too.
A
Awesome
thanks,
Louis
yeah,
thanks
Louis
cool
and
I,
just
like
wanted
to
go
over
the
rest
of
these
the
ones
we
kind
of
have
out
there
to
see
if
there's
any
kind
of
big
additions,
and
so
just
like
a
reminder,
I
think
of
what
we
want
to
you
know
have
the
next
two
days
is
kind
of
make
sure
we
have
what
all
the
priorities,
maybe
should
be
kind
of,
submit
them
or
do
something
else
and
then
have
discussion
in
the
Forum
or
anything
and
then
in
five
days
after
that
or
sorry,
seven
days
from
now,
we
can
start
the
voting
on
that.
A
So
for
now
I
guess
we
talked
about
operations
and
then
I.
Guess
we
get
in
to
voice
here
and
I.
Think
voice
is,
you
know,
I
think
voice
is
one
of
those
is
actually
very
pretty
representative.
Maybe
of
what
the
dstyle
priorities
overall
is
I
guess,
especially
when
it
comes
related
to
like
the
products,
so
I
think
with
voice
here
they
have
like
the
first
one.
Our
priority
here
is
kind
of
from
the
restructural
refocus
proposal.
A
This
is
something
that
they've
been
working
on,
is
kind
of
creating
a
more
cohesive
story
Vision
out
of
like
what
is
you
know,
geeked
out,
and
what
does
that
kind
of
mean
I
think
the
yeah,
the
phrase
here:
Flagship
product
Suite
development
and
then
yeah?
You
have
the
TX
gov
branding,
go
to
market
strategy,
carrot
branding,
go
to
market
strategy,
community
outreach
and
swapper
exhibitions
to
go
to
a
market
strategy
right,
so
I
think
you
can
kind
of
see
pretty.
A
And
to
me
this
is
like
a
perfect
example
of,
like
yeah
you're,
really
curious
to
know
what
people
think
should
be,
what
DxD
and
Recorders
think
should
be
spent
on
both
of
those,
and
it's
not
so
much
that
we
all
will
agree.
But
it's
that
there
will
be
different
yeah
different
elements
of
it.
A
Yeah
yeah
and
there's
just
like
a
kind
of
yeah
and
this
kind
of
gets
into
Keenan,
saying
I.
Think
elements
of
the
go
to
market
strategy
had
moved
up
in
priority
internally
want
to
create
campaigns
for
swapper
ahead
of
Denver
and,
like
carrot,
launching
soon
right.
So
you
can
see
how,
even
if
some
of
the
even
if
we're
thinking
okay,
like
Davi,
maybe
has
like
a
a
there's
like
kind
of
an
element
to
the
Dow
foundation
and
being
able
to
like
export
that
into.
C
A
Dows-
and
it's
really
important-
that
will
take
a
little
bit
more
time
to
do
so,
yeah
that
can
kind
of
get
into
like
execution
there
right.
Just
because
something
is
a
priority
doesn't
mean
you
can't
execute
on
other
things,
if
there's
something
that
is
like
holding
it
up,
but
yeah,
that's
a
good
good
shot
and
then
something
like
community
outreach,
I
think
is
like
just
incredibly
you.
C
A
It's
always
a
priority
and
we
always
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
like
not
letting
that
go
about
the
Wayside
and
then
yeah
just
a
couple.
A
Others
ahead
under
your
voice,
developing
key
Partnerships
thinking
about
the
biz
Dev,
like
a
definitely
a
priority
operation,
decentralization,
something
I
think
we
can
still
execute
on,
even
if
it
is
less
of
a
priority
from
the
other
ones,
because
that's
something
that
kind
of
roll
through
there
and
then
yeah
same
thing
with
like
kind
of
DX,
the
accentures
too,
as
well,
so
any
any
kind
of
thoughts.
Anything
additions,
anything
we're
missing
from
the
voice.
I
didn't
put
text
out
branding
over
here.
A
C
Branding
is
definitely
on
our
minds,
but
I
think
targeting
probably
H2,
specifically
the
Excel
I
think
that'll
be
our
Target
for
H2
as
a
larger
kind
of
overarching
goal.
C
A
Cool
yeah
and
then
we
get
into
I
guess
like
the
the
products
here,
which
I
think
are
a
little.
You
know
a
bit
different
than
when
you
think
of
the
operations
and
the
voice
Guild,
because,
like
those
of
them
yeah
I
think
that
was
I
mean
I.
Think
Biz
Dev
does
is
more
of
like
a
a
squad.
Thank
you.
So,
like
I
think
Biz
Dev
is,
like
you
know.
What's
Sky
already,
I
think
sharing
a
document
on
carrots
go.
C
A
Market
strategy,
as
well
so
I
think
Partnerships
would
be
like
a
priority
under
voice
that
Biz
Dev
is
executing
on.
A
C
A
Yeah
and
then
just
like
swapper
and
again
so
these
are
a
little
bit
different,
because
those
really
are
operations
and
voice
a
lot
about
serving
DX
Dow
as
a
whole
and
maybe
different
priorities
across
the
products
themselves
or
I.
Think
voice
is
like
almost.
How
do
you
prioritize
it
that,
whereas,
like
you,
get
into
the
product
priorities-
and
those
are
like
you
know
very
specific
and
do
get
closer
to
I
think
execution,
so
those
maybe
even
a
little
bit
more
in
the
weeds?
A
But
the
hope
of
this
you
know
having
this
monthly
is
that
we
are
giving
a
general
update
to
dxt
Holders
rep
holders
on
the
priorities
that
the
squads
feel
about
there,
and
then
they
can
give
their
kind
of
feedback
there
and
so
yeah
I
think
I
put
it's
a
swappers.
You
can
kind
of
see
the
different
one
front:
end:
maintenance
and
Bug
fixes
Network
inspection,
Eco,
Rider,
Improvement,
swapper,
Expeditions
and
other
user
acquisition.
A
Splitting
swap
from
swapper
I
was
trying
to
come
up
with
a
like
an
all
s
phrase
for
that
one.
That's
kind
of
the
idea
of
having
these
beautiful
ones.
I
know
that
I
think
he
was
thinking
of
that
we're
talking
about
that
this
week
and
it
relates
to
defy
llama
stuff,
the
other
things
that
we
have
down
here.
Maybe
they're
not
priorities
right
now.
It
could
be
in
the
future.
On
the
liquidity.e
thing.
A
I
guess
relates
a
little
bit
to
this
swap
or
token
research
as
well,
and
then
maybe
these
could
be
combined.
I,
don't
know
the
Unison,
B3,
research
or
I
think
the
Mev
capturing
amm
research,
that's
something
from
like
the
Cal
folks.
That
I
think
would
be
interesting
there
and
so
yeah
I
don't
know
if
there
are
any
omissions
or
anything
that
we
want
to
add
to
that
list.
A
C
A
Mean
that
ends
up
affecting
what
these
things
are.
So
if
we
have
yeah,
we
can
kind
of
work
on
on
getting
those
buttoned
up
and
especially
I
think
it's
important.
This
is
actually
at
a
cross
Ross's
feedback
for
DX
gov.
It's
especially
important
for
to
align
how
things
are
referred
to,
let's
say
internally,
within
a
guild
and
have
that
be
able
to
relate
to
the
governance.
Just
you
know
to
DxD
holders
and
rep
holders
in
in
the
same
language
right
and
we
have.
If
we
have
alignment
between.
A
Makes
it
easier
for
things
to
follow
so
I?
Think
language
is
important
to
nitpick
of
I'm,
not
sure
if
I
assumed
what
you
were
saying
there,
but
yeah
cool
any
yeah
anything
on
on
swapper
in
terms
of
additional
things,
anything
we.
A
Cool
and
then
just
because
I'm
gonna
close
we're
gonna
close
off
with
it
I
have
not.
Oh,
this
is
bad.
We've
not
fully
done
the
the
carrot
one,
but
in
carrots
a
little
bit
simpler,
I
think
right
now,
just
because
the
Pearl
neck
is
kind
of
like
launch
and
partly
because
it's
driven
a
little
bit
more
by
yeah,
an
individual.
We
don't
have
as
much
of
the
different
work
streams
going
right
now,
but
I
think
the
two
ones
right
there
so
yeah.
This
is
great
too.
A
Oh
here
we
go.
This
is
this
is
for
carrot
perfect.
This
is
from
venky
here,
yeah,
and
so
because
again
it's
more
about
like
you,
it's
helpful
to
explain
these
things
to
the
community,
so
they
kind
of
understand.
What's
going
on
so
even
we
say
ship
V1
like
clearly
there's
kind
of
like
well
there's
the
it
seems
to
be.
A
Like
the
kpi
token
part,
the
front
end-
and
you
know
different
parts,
so
just
breaking
it
down
a
little
bit
can
only
be
a
little
bit
helpful
to
people
when
they're
trying
to
to
follow
along
and
I
know
it's
a
little
sometimes
nerve-wracking
to
let
people
peer
into
the
work
that
you're
doing
but
I.
Think
like
good
communication,
will
help
these
things.
You
know
because
the
key
thing
is
when
we're
having
these
discussions
in
four
or
five
months,
and
people
want
to
get
more
funding
for
the
second
half
of
the
years.
A
A
We'll
probably
know
a
little
bit
but
I'll
put
them
there,
okay
and
then
for
DX
gov.
We
have
these
five
right
here.
Hopefully,
you've
been
staring
at
the
screen
long
enough,
so
you
don't
need
to
hear
me,
read
them,
but
Ross
I
think
you
had
a
couple
things
you
wanted
to
say
in
terms
of
about
execution.
C
B
I
was
thinking
we
were
spending
more
time
sort
of
going
through
explaining
what
each
of
these
were
so,
but
I'll
briefly
run
through
this
just
to
not
take
up
too
much
more
time.
I
made
some
slides,
yeah
and
I
I
did
think.
I
would
counter
you
with
a
Japanese
phrase.
Instead,
that
is
somewhat
related.
There
was
this
is
just
governance,
2.0
and
almost
people
were
pretty
aware,
but
this
also
includes
the
1.5
stepping
stone
and
along
the
lines
of
rivers
and
going
across
them.
I
thought
stepping
stone.
B
So
this
is
which
is
a
slightly
different
meaning.
It
means,
if
you
spend
time
in
the
river
you're,
probably
going
to
die
in
the
river,
so
you
know
slightly
different.
Take
on
crossing
rivers
there,
basically
don't
go
into
them
for
too
long
so
yeah.
This
was
a
pretty
simple
one.
Yeah
very
motivational
I
think
it's
quite
similar
to
Dave's
of
going
across
with
stone
shoes.
B
So
yeah
everyone
kind
of
knows
this
and,
as
Chris
already
went
over,
it's
pretty
solidified
as
being
important,
and
it's
also
already
set
as
a
lovable
for
H1
in
our
budget.
The
other
ones
are
where
I
wanted
to
explain
things
a
bit
more,
so
we
have
Devi
on
chain
accessibility,
it's!
B
If
anyone
caught
the
talk,
I
did
in
Columbia
sort
of
along
those
lines
of
trying
to
make
Dao,
basically
a
thousand
General,
more
accessible
for
non-technical
contributors,
so
all
the
accessible
autonomous
stuff
and
yeah
it's
kind
of
a
big
product,
differentiator,
there's
already
stuff
that
we
that
we
do
well,
but
the
things
we
can
improve
on
very
easily
and
they're
on
the
road
map
as
well.
For
for
improving
that
ux,
but
yeah.
C
B
A
social
ux
stuff,
which
was
a
lot
earlier.
Certainly
it's
had
a
lot
less
development
time
we
just
pushed
out
before
we
launched
for
internal
guilds,
but
this
kind
of
leads
into
more
of
the
ideas
we're
having
with
a
flagship
product
and
having
this
like
more
of
this
Suite
with
the
social
aspects
and
quite
important
to
the
stuff
we
were
talking
about
in
Colombia,
so
that's
split
off
into
another
priority,
and
then
that
is
expansion.
B
This
is
more
like
going
Beyond
guilds
and
governance
2.0
into
what
other
governance
systems
we
want
to
add
into
Davi,
because
we've
been
architecting.
It
is
that
we
can
easily
add
on
additional
things
to
things
like
Governor
or
other
there's,
a
reason.
There's
a
vampire
on
there.
It's
sort
of
a
potentially
good
way
of
expanding
and
getting
more
users.
A
B
A
A
Governance
1.5
a
priority
and
governance.
2.0
is
a
priority
or
is
it
like
actually
yeah
2.0?
Was
it
the
stepping
stone
the
stepping
stone
to
2.0,
and
that
just
makes
it
easier
for
people
to
understand?
What's
like?
Why
are
we
working
with
1.5
contracts
if
the
if
the
priority
is
2.0
when
it's
like
well
they're
kind.
B
B
A
A
You
know,
there's
not
any
enforceability
to
this
yet,
but
you
know
in
a
way
you
are
kind
of
like
pitching
DTD
and
rep
holders
on
like
these
are
the
things
that
the
priorities
that
we're
working
on
and
like
support
them
or
vote
for
them.
So
you
can
see
in
the
future
that
it's
a
good
idea
to
make
sure
that
we
are
explaining
these
priorities
more
and
I'm.
Just
like
thinking
more
about
it
now,
I.
A
A
Notes
and
form
discussions,
we're
saying
so
seven
days
from
now
will
be
open
for
any
new
submissions
for
two
days
and
yeah.
As
you
said,
I
think
the
wording
changes
are
really
important.
Maybe
we
will
not
be
using
Google
form
submissions.
A
This
is
exciting,
based
on
Lewis's,
great
presentation
and
then
yeah
working
on
that
polling,
app
and
Bobby
integration,
because
I
don't
think
that
we're
the
type
of
we're
the
only
ones
that
need
this
and
I
think
it's
another
good
example
of
like
if
you
can
showcase
governance
or
showcase
an
interesting
tool,
that's
a
way
of
getting
people
into
the
ecosystem,
so
I
think
there
is
yeah
part
of
this.
That's
kind
of
setting.
A
It
for
future
use
and
hopefully
for
future
use
with
Davi
yeah,
and
so
we'll
do
this
again
in
about
a
month,
maybe
yeah
about
exactly
probably
a
month,
because
we
want
to
do
it
before
East,
Denver
and
yeah,
we'll
be
following
up
for
the
Forum
post
and
then
info
on
how
we
can
end
up
voting
but
we'll
have
to
yeah.
That
may
take
a
little
bit
of
work
to
to
work
to
iron
out.