►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-03-16]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
geek
style
governance,
discussion
for
wednesday
march
16th,
happy
a
belated
pi
day
and
happy
belated
ides
of
march.
Let's
start
first
with
the
proposal.
Roundup
pi
day
in
europe
is
july,
22nd
for
those
paying
attention
at
home,
yeah.
So
starting
with
mainnet.
Here
a
couple
proposals
on
mainnet
here,
actually
three.
Now
that
I
think
of
it,
one
was
not
on
the
the
government's
discussion
wanted
agenda,
but
yeah
the
first
one
here
is
the
global
governance
gathering
sponsor
jeep,
otherwise
known
as
ggg.
B
This
is
a
daoist,
amsterdam
event,
and
this
is
actually
the
funding
proposal
so
that
there
is
a
separate
mirror
proposal
on
xdi
for
people
to
vote
on
and
support
it.
But
this
is
the
actual
mainnet
proposal
itself,
which
is
sending
12
000
believe
this
is
xdi
and
ustc.
I
wish
I
knew
that
I
should
have
known
because
of
the
decimals.
B
C
Is
that
correct
sky
yeah
the
mirror
proposal?
The
reason
this
one
is
delayed
by
a
few
days
is
because
the
original
main
net
one
at
the
same
time
as
the
x
that
one
was
incorrect,
ustc
amount.
Obviously,
so
this
was
redone.
So
this
raises
like
a
kind
of
a
dow
question
because
we're
because
we
already
signaled
support
to
sponsor
the
this
event.
Ggg
event
we
haven't
paid.
C
C
We
have
this
one,
that's
moving
the
money,
and
so
I
would
say
that
you
know
they've
already
tweeted
and
they
were
actually
saving
a
spot
for
us,
because
we
expressed
that
we
were
interested
in
becoming
one
of
the
patron
sponsors
and
there's
only
a
certain
number
of
spots,
so
they
were
saving
a
spot
for
us
and
they
actually
just
tweeted
about
us
being
a
supporter
and
a
patron
dao
sponsor.
C
So
I
would
say
that
yeah
this.
If
we
say
that
the
we've
already
signaled
support,
we
are
sponsoring
it,
and
this
is
the
proposal
that
moves
the
money.
I
would
say
that
we,
the
dao,
could
already
say
on
twitter
that,
like
we
are
excited
to
sponsor
and
support
the
taoist
again
is
it
would
be
my,
but
we
can't
yeah.
You
can't
really
point
to
this
proposal,
because
this
proposal's
not
passed.
B
C
Yeah
yeah,
we
want
to
respond
to
that
tweet
and
so
okay,
like
what
language
to
use-
and
I
think
chris
is
saying
if
we
could
say
yeah
dx
now
passed.
A
proposal
to
sponsor
is
excited
to
have
passed
the
proposal
to
sponsor
the
dxs
and
there's
another
proposal.
That's
making
the
payment
or
something.
B
And
sky
always
does
a
really
good
job
of
mirroring
these
proposals,
because
I
think
that's
what
like
is
really
kind
of
great
here.
I
think
there's
a
little
bit
the
only
problem
with
this
one
was
because
the
first
proposal
had
the
wrong
usdc,
but
I
think
in
like
a
perfect
world,
the
mirror
proposal
is
linked
to
the
main
net
proposal
itself
and
then,
like
you,
can
kind
of
see.
B
Oh,
this
is
clearly
when,
where
people
are
voting
and
then
like
the
actual
payment
is
happening
elsewhere,
and
then
I
think
you
know
the
other
thing
to
think
about
how
this
can
be
solved
is,
of
course,
we
have
some
of
these
signed
votes
id
things
here
that
we've
been
playing
around
with
there,
so
that
could
be
a
similar
way
of
like
almost
combining
the
proposal
where
you're
signing
on
another
chain
or
voting
on
another
chain,
but
it's
actually
like
one
length
on
the
mainnet
one
but
yeah
I
like
kind
of
thinking
about
how
this
looks
from
you
know
we're
trying
to
showcase
governance
and
and
how
exactly
do
we
explain
that
to
typically.
C
B
B
D
F
E
F
Cable
ring
key
share
it
on
vtv.
F
F
B
In
the
show
we
put
this
little
in
here
and
we'll
see
if
it
see
if
it
works,
we
can
go
on
to
the
next
proposal.
G
B
Two
proposals
also
on
mainnet,
that
maybe
we
haven't
seen
a
while
one
is
just
a
simple
worker
proposal
from
dave.
This
one
has
actually
also
been
voted
on
within
the
last
hour
at
a
certain
gas
price.
So
if
you
check
back
later,
maybe
it
will
have
a
new
vote
on
it,
but
there's
that
one
and
then
also
one
from
caney
fork
about
the
ethan
versus
stipend
and
gen
reimbursement,
and
I
speak
for
myself,
but
the
reason
that
I
was
doing
this
on
main
net.
B
Obviously
because
gas
prices
are
lower,
is
one
reason,
but
actually
these
cost
in
eth
were
actually
incurred
on
mainnet
because
they
were
current
from
the
caney
fork
address.
So
part
of
the
reason
doing
this
proposal
is
because,
like
that's
what
needs
to
come
into
my
candy
fork
address,
because
that's
where
I'm
actually
paying
a
lot
of
the
gas
fees
itself
there.
But
a
lot
of
this
is
because
of
the
lower
gas
cost
there.
B
Okay,
let's
check
this
before
going
to
going
to
notice
chain
still
not
yet
but
yeah.
Let's
move
to
gnosis
chain
and
look
at
the
proposals
there,
an
interesting
mix
of
proposals
on
gnosis
chain,
actually
not
too
many
regular
proposals.
There
were,
as
I
said,
a
couple,
maybe
there's
regular
proposals
actually
on
mainnet
and
then
we
have
yeah.
B
The
three
three
live
buyback
orders
right
now
there
is
a
contributor
proposal
for
boris
block,
but
the
big
proposals
you
can
see
here
are
all
of
these
swapper
farming
proposals,
which
I
think
are
really
cool.
Big
thanks
to
kenan
who
is
getting
is
in
the
sun
right
now
enjoying
that
but
set
up
all
these
proposals
last
week.
I
think
there
were
16
proposals
here
and
it's
really
cool.
I
think
for
all
these
coming
through
the
the
governance.
Some
of
these
are
really
cool
because
they
involve
like.
B
So
I
think
this
one
is
actually
two
two
token
campaign,
but.
B
Like
some
three
token
campaigns-
and
so
you
know
just
all
of
this
campaigns
being
managed
through
the
governance
process-
I
think
is-
is
really
cool
and
also
kind
of
highlights,
some
things
that
we
need
to
do
and
maybe
improve
on
governance
or
understand.
B
I
think
spicy
soup
noticed
this
in
the
in
the
discord
that
you
can
see
how
quickly
holographic
consensus
runs
up
the
price
of
jet.
So
I
don't
know
how
much
it
would
be
right
now
to
boost,
but
something
probably
around,
like
eight
or
nine
thousand
gen,
just
to
boost
a
proposal,
and
that's
because
all
these
proposals
are
going
in
in
one
shot
and
the
way
holographic
consensus
works.
B
Is
it's
designed
to
curate
based
on
importance
for
voters
here,
so
it's
basically
increasing
the
cost
of
capital
to
get
a
proposal
in
front
of
voters
here,
but
yeah.
These
are
actually
just
set
to
pass
in
the
next
couple
hours
and
then
we'll
launch
those
camp.
And
then
I
will
launch
those
campaigns
and
yeah.
They
start
tomorrow
at
1500,
utc.
B
The
last
thing
I
noticed
in
terms
of
process,
one
of
the
things
we
did
here
was
we
actually
simulated
all
of
the
proposals
even
before
we
boosted
them.
So
we
had
because
the
funds
were
actually
already
in
the
relay
or
we
were
able
to
simulate
them,
which
gives
us
a
little
bit
more
confidence
about
like
kind
of
boosting
them
and
using
them
yeah.
You
can
see
this
one's
going
to
pass
the
next
couple
hours.
One
last
thing
on
these
now,
I'm
thinking
of
it
also
reminds
me
of
a
use
case
of
jolt.
B
Is
it
is
very
important
when
you
are
moving
these
proposals
out
of
the
boosted
area
or
into
the
boosted
area
from
pending
boost
that
you
do
it
in
the
correct
order.
B
So
you
see
here
like
you
need
to
do
it
based
upon
the
least
amount
of
gen,
because
as
soon
as
you
move
this
proposal
up
to
the
next
one
that
actually
increases
the
number
of
boosted
proposals
and
then
increases
the
threshold
that
you
need
to
meet
here.
So
if
you
were
to
boost
this
one
first,
which
is
one
thousand,
you
know
five
hundred
and
six
gen.
Of
course
that
would
get
boosted,
but
then
that
would
increase
the
threshold
where
this
first
one
would
no
longer
get
boosted.
B
I
think
I'm
not
sure
if
it
was
me
or
dave
or
it
could
have
been
keenan,
but
there
was
a
buyback
proposal
that
was
it
had,
I
think
990
gen
and
it
was
fine,
but
I
think
these
two
proposed.
I
think
these
four
proposals
would
have
gotten
messed
up
if
it
was
done
in
that
order,
even
though
the
ones
at
the
bottom
would
have,
but
that's
never
really
getting
into
the
weeds
here.
B
B
There
have
been
times
that
other
people
who
should
be
named
did
not
boost
things
in
the
right
order,
but
the
point
of
all
this,
of
course,
is
that
if
we
have
an
automated
system
of
decentralized
people
that
are
paying
for
transactions
that
will
solve
this
problem
as
long
as
they're
meeting
it
according
to
certain
certain
ways
so
excited
for
for
jolt
in
that
way,
yeah
okay,
pass
swapper
farming
proposals,
they're
also
another
pretty
interesting
proposal
on
the
multi-call
and
also
in
the
oh.
B
Here
we
go
nice
kind
of
boost
here,
so
we
have
two
proposals
here.
You
have
two
proposal
here.
This
is
a
deposit.
415
weft
and
1.1
million
x
die
in
the
swapper,
and
then
this
is
actually
the
multi-call
proposal
that
provisions
the
liquidity.
So
maybe
dave
you
want
to
like
walk
us
through
how
we
got
to
got
to
this
step
of
where
we,
where
we
are
now,
where
we're
submitting
this
proposal
to
provision
this
liquidity.
B
D
Absolutely
so
what
we're
doing
here
in
this
specific
proposal
is
actually
provisioning
liquidity.
So
we
have
a
separate
proposal,
sending
funds
to
the
swapper
relay
and
over
the
past
weeks,
or
so,
we've
tested
the
withdrawal
function
of
the
swapper
relay.
D
So
we
covered
that
on
a
couple
of
calls
just
to
make
sure
that
we
can
withdraw
liquidity
from
our
lp
pools
on
swapper
and
different
ways
to
do
so,
and
what
this
proposal
is
doing
is
pretty
much
the
opposite,
so,
instead
of
removing
liquidity,
we're
adding
liquidity
and
yeah,
so
we're
doing
this
in
a
couple
of
steps,
so
the
total
amount
of
funds
sent
to
the
swapper
relay
is
actually
much
higher
than
what
we're
doing
here.
D
But
we'll
do
this
in
like
three
or
four
proposals,
most
likely
just
to
break
it
up
into
smaller
sums,
and
the
way
it
really
works
is
that
the
this
multi-core
does
a
call
to
the
swapper
relayer
ordering
a
provision
of
liquidity,
which
is
just
an
order
in
the
relayer.
Once
that
order
is
placed
by
the
dow.
D
D
We
just
have
to
call
the
update
oracle
function
twice,
which
just
makes
sure
that
we
check
the
prices
of
those
assets
at
the
given
time.
So
what
we
put
here
is
just
an
estimation.
In
fact,
ether
has
moved
up
quite
a
bit,
so
we'll
probably
have
a
bit
of
ether
left
out,
because
we
won't
have
enough
wrapped
extra
in
this
proposal.
So
what
the
oracle
does?
It
actually
makes
sure
that
checks
that
price
is
at
the
time
of
the
order
being
posted.
D
We
do
that
twice
just
to
make
sure
that
the
price
isn't
manipulated
and
then
what
we
do
is
we
just
call
function
number
four,
which
executes
the
order,
and,
given
that
the
original
call
came
from
the
dow,
the
relay
has
all
the
permissions
to
actually
pulse
that
order
on
swapper
and
that's
kind
of
how
we
provide
the
liquidity
into
the
lp
pool
yeah,
and
that's
pretty
much
it
not
sure.
If
there
are
any
questions
or
and
well,
one
interesting
fact
is
oh
interesting
to
me.
D
I
don't
know
how
interesting
it
really
is,
but
we're
actually
sending
xdi
to
the
swapper
relayer
and
the
relayer
itself
automatically
wraps
it
up.
So,
if
you
look
at
token
b,
that's
actually
the
token
address
of
wrap
x
die,
but
we
never
wrap
the
x
die.
So
this
is
actually
something
that
happens
automatically
within
the
relayer
when
it
gets
the
x
die.
It's
just
wrapped.
B
I
found
that
interesting
yeah,
and
this
is
exciting
for
lots
of
reasons
mostly
because
this
is
going
to
be
an
injection
of
capital
into
swapper,
and
I
think
swapper
has
a
lot
of
things
you
know
going
on
it's
back
right
now.
We
just
don't
know
over
those
swapper
farming
campaigns
and
a
lot
of
talk
there.
So
I
think
this
liquidity
will
be
will
be
very
nice
and
important,
so
this
would
just
be
the
the
beginning
of
it.
B
I
think
one
of
the
reasons
to
split
it
up
is
just
because
it
is
such
a
large
deposit.
It
could,
you
know,
lead
to
some
manipulation
or
I
don't
know
we.
B
Okay,
I
think
that
was
it
for
gnosis
chain
proposals.
Any
questions
comments,
concerns.
B
Let's
switch
to
arbitrary
one
actually
did
not
have
these
on
the
agenda.
I
think
the
copy
is
marked
down.
File
was
not
working
for
arbitrary,
but
there's
just
like
xi
or
just
like
gnosis
chain,
there's
tons
and
tons
of.
Oh,
the
proposals
have
already
passed.
So
that's
why
they're
not
there,
but
venky
has
been
submitting
the
proposals
and
doing
them
there.
So
we've
got
the
swapper
proposals
there
on
our
patreon.
B
B
So,
as
I
said,
dave
and
I
both
submitted
proposals-
and
I
said
argue
could
be
done
on
xdi-
I
think
the
reason
dave
did
it
here
was
because
he's
also
doing
a
rep
sync
and
the
reason
I
was
doing
it
here
was
because,
as
I
said,
the
eth
was
reimbursed
to
the
account
that
was
spent,
which
was
on
main
net,
but
I
think
low
gas
on
ethereum
is
somehow
happening
while
the
rest
of
the
world
has
high
gas
prices,
but
we
should
be
taking
advantage
of
these
low
gas
prices.
B
I
guess
it's
75
way
now,
which
is
like
somehow
hot
low
in
the
last
couple
months,
but
it's
like
high
over
the
last
like
week
or
two.
If
you
see
like,
I
don't
know
I've
been
getting
like.
I
think
I
got
something
in
the
teens
in
over
the
weekend,
so
it's
the
gas
is,
is
pretty
low,
and
so
I
think
we
should
take
it
advantage
of
this
to
to
do
rep,
syncs
and
other
mainnet
proposals,
and
I
do
think
there's
opportunities
to
maybe
brainstorm
here
or
think
about
offline
of
like
well.
B
Are
there
any
other
types
of
like
main
net
proposals
or
things
that
we've
been
maybe
pushing
off?
Because
you
know
gas
has
been
over
a
hundred
way.
Gas
is
still
like
a
big
expense,
but
maybe
it's
an
opportunity
to
do
some
things
that
we've
been
we've
been
putting
off.
D
A
It
if
we
wanted
to
know
yeah,
I
think,
would
be
how
we
actually
do
the
proposals
by
because
we
can
use
the
multi-call
for
that.
B
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think
what
sky
is
kind
of
suggesting
is
like
there
are
people
that
do
the
dsd
investing
themselves
and
I've
done
it
on
main
net
because
they
like
mainnet,
and
so
I
think,
if
you
want
to
do
that
yourself
now,
is
a
good
opportunity,
because
gas
is
relatively
cheap,
but
I
think
it
probably
doesn't
make
sense
to
do.
Everybody's
yeah.
C
There's
a
couple
people,
or
maybe
more
than
a
couple
that
like
so
I
know
I'm
talking
to
tammy
about
it
right
now,
but
I
think
kaiden
also.
I
was
talking
to
him
in
the
past.
C
There's
a
few
different
ways
to
do
it,
and
so
I
think
I
was
yeah
with
lower
gas
like
that's
an
opportunity
for
someone
like
those
two
people
to
that.
Maybe
they
want
their
dxd
just
in
a
vest
in
contract.
They
they
may
go
ahead
with
that
on
on
main
net
and
obviously
cheaper
gas
is
better
for
that,
but
that
that's
like
one-off
scenarios,
that's
not
a
good
answer
for
like
getting
everyone's
dxd
into
best
in
contracts.
I
don't
think
so.
C
B
And
then,
just
for,
like
the
governance
check
on
that
remember,
we
did
pass
a
proposal
in
mid
december
early
december.
That
was
a
approval
of
dxd
issuance
to
contributors
that
had
not
received
it.
So
anyone
is
my
interpretation
of
a
proposal
right.
Anyone
is
now
eligible
to
be
able
to
submit
proposals
that
pay
out
dxd2
vesting
contracts
that
fit
under
that
kind
of
proposal,
and
that
should
be
kind
of
easy
to
track,
and
so
I
think
anyone
is
able
to
do
that,
but
that's
kind
of
separate
from
like.
C
Yeah
one
strategy-
and
I
think
I
posted
about
this,
but
one
strategy
was
like
I
had
from
from
yet
two
years
ago
I
had
some
or
actually
from
one
and
two
years
ago.
Actually
from
one
year
ago,
I
had
some
dxd
that
vests
like
starting
march
1st,
but
I
basically
to
save
gas.
I
combined
like
march
and
april
into
may
and
june,
and
so
then
I
actually
just
put
those
four
months
together
in
the
delayed
by
delayed
by
two
months
so
march
april.
So
may
1st
so
like.
C
I
can't
my
cliff
for
that
period
should
have
been
march
first,
but
I
have
it
locked
up
till
may
1st
just
because
it
made
it
easier
and
saved
gas
and
stuff.
But
that's
like
another
idea
to
like
combine.
If
you
have
like
multi-month
periods,
you
could
combine
them
in
in
one
and
probably
use
the
conservative
later
date
is
one
way
to
do
it,
but.
B
Next
up,
I
just
wanted
to
chat
briefly
about
the
swap
fee.
The
update
spot
fee
vinky
could
not
make
it,
but
he
did
want
to
tell
me
to
pass
along.
Let
me
pull
up
what
he
said
so
he's
hoping
to
move
forward
with
the
swap
fee
adjustment
to
start
with
the
gnosis
chain.
So
remember
we
had
talked
about
this.
B
I
guess
it's
almost
been
a
month
here,
but
we've
been
chatting
about
this
for
a
while
about
increasing
the
swap
fee
on
certain
pairs
and
basically
this
swapper
and
dxd,
and
I
think
we
have
landed
at
this
as
something
to
experiment.
It
may
decrease
the
amount
of
volume,
but
maybe
increase
the
overall
amount
of
fees
to
lps,
which
would
increase
the
protocol
fee.
B
I
think
it
makes
sense
for
certain
tokens
that
maybe
are
not
necessarily
being
driven
by
the
swap
fee
percentage
so
yeah
after
some
of
these,
you
can
kind
of
see
some
of
the
polls
here
on
what
people
are
looking
for,
and
I
think
the
we
had
hoped
to
use.
Maybe
a
swapper
snapshot
for
this,
but
I
don't
think
we
can,
because
we
had
some
of
the
seeking
issues
but
yeah.
B
I
was
going
to
work
with
vinky
this
week
about
submitting
some
swap
feed
proposals
where
we
increased
the
swapper
xy1
from
zero
to
one
percent
and
then
increase
the
dxd
weft
swap
fee
from
0.25
to
0.6,
and
we
just
waiting
for
some
of
these
proposals
to
clear
full,
clear.
A
B
And
lower
the
the
the
minimum
threshold
to
boost
them,
but
wanted
to
check
here
to
see
if
there
was
any
thoughts
before
submitting
those
proposals
up
for
a
vote.
B
B
B
Sorry,
I'm
on
the
wrong
browser.
Dxd
buyback
extension
number,
seven
lucky
number,
seven
dave
anything
to
be
on
the
lookout
for
for
this
one
here.
D
Well,
one
thing
to
be
on
the
lookout
is
actually
chris's
comment
so
well.
I
posted
this
extension
with
my
very
thorough
approach
of
copying.
The
previous
buyback
extension
number
six
and
changing
the
data
points
that
needed
to
be
changed,
and
one
thing
chris
observed
is
that
previously,
we've
always
sold
ether
to
move
funds
to
gnosis
chain,
and
I
think
chris's
comment
is
just
opening
up
a
bit.
The
idea
to
give
some
thought
about.
You
know
the
funds
and
how
we
use
them.
D
Ether
is
not
at
the
you
know,
highest
price
we've
seen
it
it's
not
at
the
lowest.
You
know,
I
think,
that's
ultimately
very
subjective,
but
we
do
also
have
stable.
Coins
on
mainnet,
for
example,
die
right.
So
if
we're
looking
to
bridge
some
dye
and
some
weft
to
ignore
this
chain,
we
could
just
bridge
wef
as
it
is.
B
Yeah,
but
just
to
set
the
stage
so
we
are
actually
dave
is
talking
about
the
transfer
proposal
to
gnosis
chain,
not
the
buyback
extension,
but
this
is
a
very
similar
thing,
and
so
you
know
we've
been
doing
transfers
to
knowledge
chain
for
a
while.
But
the
point
I
was
making
here
is
like
going
forward
we're
going
to
have
to
think
about.
B
How
are
we
funding
deep
style
operations,
whether
that's
coming
from
the
ethassa
base
or
using
existing
stable
coins,
or
even
like
selling
dxd,
and
so
not
something
to
think
about
at
all
right
now,
but
maybe
something
I
think
in
the
future
about
like
how
are
we
actually
funding
the
operations
like
given
our
capital
base
dave?
Are
you
unmuted.
B
But
yeah
yeah
any
yes
and
not
really
any
actual
items,
but
maybe
like
kind
of
yeah
just
going
forward
something
to
think
about
in
terms
of
the
funding
and
then,
while
we
were
on
it,
the
original
question
anything
in
this
buyback
extension
number
seven.
So
I
guess
this
is
the
draft
up.
Now
we
don't
have
the
proposal
up,
but
I
think
this
is
recall.
B
D
Yeah,
the
only
thing
is
that
the
the
txt
issue
to
contribute
is
right,
so
yeah.
B
We're
still
working
on
that
we're
actually
maybe
chat
about
that
contributor
contributor,
yeah,
just
estimating
that,
so
we
can
have
an
accurate
idea
of
what
the
dxd
circulating
supply
is,
and
it
did
look
like
coin
gecko,
actually
lowered
the
circulating
supply
with
that
last
dxd
return
proposal
that
it
now
recognizes
that
dxd
in
the
treasury.
So
I
think
the
yeah
the
circulating
supply
on
nose's
chain
is
now
forty.
Eight
thousand
four
hundred
eighty,
I
mean
sorry
the
circulating
on
coin.
Gecko
is
now
forty.
Eight
thousand
four
hundred
eighty
eight.
B
Yeah-
and
that
was
it
for
the
agenda,
is
there
anything
else
we
missed
anything
else?
We
should
be
chatting
about
anything
on
the
mind.