►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-08-03]
Description
00:03 Welcome and Agenda
00:19 Mainnet
10:59 Gnosis Chain
14:00 Arbitrum
14:35 Delegate DXdao's ENS Tokens to CaneyFork.eth
24:27 LevelK
A
A
B
Absolutely
so
this
proposal
just
moves
the
remainder
of
raw
you
currently
have
in
the
treasury.
That's
why?
If
you
look
at
the
whey
amount,
it's
a
very
special
number
or
very
exact
number.
It
just
moves
out
the
remainder
of
the
current
rye
into
the
multisig
to
be
sold
for
die,
and
you
know
we've
been
monitoring
reflexes
for
a
while.
Now
the
redemption
rate
is
still
double
digit
negative.
So
I
think
you
know
it
definitely
makes
sense
to
currently
exit
this
position
and
I
think
overall,
at
dxdow.
Everyone
is
a
big
fan
of
reflexes.
B
Due
to
the
decentralization,
it's
really
just
more
a
question
about
market
conditions
and
yeah.
I
think
it
just
makes
sense
to
keep
monitoring
it
and
then
eventually
you
know,
if
things
change
in
the
future,
we
can
always
redo
a
proposal
to
reacquire
samurai
and
that's
pretty
much
it
yeah.
So
I
hope
you
won't
miss
my
rai
talks.
A
B
A
These
is
leverage,
and
it's
just
not
a
very
high
demand
right
now
and
that's
what's
kind
of
affecting
that,
but,
like
I
think,
the
good
news
for
rye
holders
is
like
deeps
down
is
even
if,
like
rye,
goes
down
to
say
two
dollars
and
fifty
cents
like
if
you
reacquire
it
there,
it
will
presumably
like
stabilize
there.
So
it's
kind
of
like
deep
style
got
out
and
then
like
reacquires
at
a
lower
price.
I
guess
more
rye,
but
that's
not.
A
A
Cool
yeah
that
will
finish
in
four
days
and
then
two
other.
This
is
a
cool.
We
have
like,
basically,
three
different
schemes,
we're
using
here.
So
let's
start
with
this:
the
ens
public
resolver
scheme.
So
this
is
a
proposal
to
update
dxstats.eth
to
dxfv.
1.6
dx
has
gotten
a
lot
of
upgrades.
It's
been
really
nice,
and
so
I
think
this
is
another
one
there.
I
don't
know
if
anyone
had
any
comments
or
thoughts
on
the
ens
update,
it'll
be
boosted
in
12
hours,
and
then
it
has
three
hours.
A
B
A
B
B
So
this
proposal
just
uses
the
generic
multi-call,
which
can
call
any
smart
contract,
doesn't
require
a
whitelist
to
interact
with
the
pudgy
rod,
nft
smart
contract
and
transfer
our
pudgy
rod
back
to
the
rightful
owner,
and
we
also
went
over
the
nft
transfer
function
just
to
make
sure
there's
no
funny
thing
happening
there
and
it
looks
pretty
safe
so
to
speak
here.
So,
unfortunately,
soon
we
will
no
longer
have
a
pudgy
rod
in
the
treasury
so
enjoy
these
last
eight
days
of
pajirada.
B
A
It
I
mean,
I
feel,
like
penguins:
don't
need
fishing
rods
because
they're
like
very
good
penguin
like
fishers
themselves,
but
yeah
well,
this
is
fun
and
it's
cool
like
that.
We
now
like
think
about
how
to
send
an
nft
right.
I
don't
know
what
nfts
will
kind
of
be
used
for
in
the
future,
but
it's
it's
good.
It's
interesting
to
figure.
A
A
So
long
so,
if
you
notice
the
like,
this
still
has
another
eight
and
a
half
days,
and
so
I
know
dave
is
excited
you
know
maybe
to
get
this
over,
but
we're
still
gonna
be
talking
about
the
pudgy
rod
proposal
for
another
eight
days.
I
think
it's
15
days
total
to
go
through
that,
and
so
that's
like
just
a
higher
security
measure,
because
it
could
be
any
smart
contract.
A
B
E
C
D
E
Yeah
I'd
have
to
go,
look
at
exactly
how
it
it
does
it.
I
think
anything
that
conforms
to
erc20
would
should
be
blocked
by
it,
but
it's
maybe
imperfect
though,
like
if
you,
I
think,
if
you
had
control
over
the
the
token
right
and
you
send
that
to
dx
dao,
then
there
would
be
a
way
around
it
right.
It's
not
secure.
But
if,
if
you
were
adhering
to
like
the
standard
like
most
public
tokens
of
value,
you
do,
then
the
block
should
work.
D
D
Yeah
another
thing
about
this
ens
mistake
was
a
was
its
own
mistake,
but
in
general
ens
the
whole
one
of
the
things
they've
sold
enos
by
in
unstoppable
domains
too,
is
don't
use
your
long
address
use
your
short
address.
It
just
makes
everything
easier
and
better
when
actually
like.
If
I
give
you
an
ens
and
you
go
and
try
to
send
to
it,
well,
you
go
and
try
to
figure
out
what
address
is
that
ens,
it's
very
confusing
in
the
ens
system?
D
D
A
Cool
and
that
is
it
for
mainnet
yeah,
there's
three
proposals
there
and
then,
let's
switch
to
noses
chain,
I'm
using
frame.
Finally
in
a
different
browser,
so
it's
nice,
it's
loading,
it's
much
quicker!
Actually
chrome
is
much
quicker
than
yeah.
There's
a
couple
different
worker
proposals,
this
one
from
lucy
foss
for
may
to
july.
I
think
this
one's
actually
just
a
zero
yeah
0.11001
die
just
to
kind
of
lay
out
the
responsibilities
and
then
there's
milan
v,
helping
out
with
qa
stuff.
A
I
believe
this
is
his
fourth
month.
I
also
heard
milan
v
got
a
very,
very
cool
tattoo
in
paris.
I
would
suggest
looking
at
pictures
somewhat
dx
dow
inspired
ether,
labs,
ap
worker
proposal
july
to
september
ether
labs.
They
be,
of
course,
venky
doing
some
great
work
with
swapper,
and
this
is
a
fun
proposal
just
because
yeah
it
includes
a
lot
of
the
stuff
that
swapper's
been
working
on
the
potential
features
and
going
forward
and
then
yeah
what
like,
what
is
the
priority?
A
What
kind
of
costs
or
what?
What
are
more
resource,
intensive
and
so
yeah?
It's
a
good
good
proposal
to
check
out
and
then
there
is
guarantee
who
has
been
doing
some
great
work
on
dx
stats.
So
we
just
had
that
proposal
up
to
upgrade
the
ens
and
guerp
has
been
helping
out
on
that,
and
then
we
have
medusa
coming
from
the
excuve
team.
A
As
this
is
a
nice
one,
it's
been
one
year
actually,
since
you
started
contributing
to
dxdow
and
I
think
yeah,
it's
probably
a
pretty
pretty
big
year
kind
of
think
of
all
the
things
that
have
gone
on
there
so
yeah
and
then
there's
a
couple.
Other
proposals
from
we
got
a
couple.
Skymind
proposals,
his
contributor
proposal
here
and
then
there
are
two
different
two
different
reimbursements.
A
Where
one
is
the
columbia,
contributor,
stipend
and
then
the
one
is
for
dx,
dow
team
dinner
in
paris
and
then
there's
alique
contributor
proposal
for
contributor
x,
squad,
bertioti,
tx,
paris,
stipend
and
then
yeah.
These
are
actually
just
boosting
right
now,
another
buyback
order
and
then
a
melanie
contributor
proposal
for
the
end.
F
A
A
A
A
Cool
and
then
discussion
items
first
up.
I
wanted
to
talk
briefly
about
a
post.
I
made
a
little
over
a
week
ago,
delegate
deke
styles
cns
tokens
to
caneyfork.eth,
so
this
is
kind
of
meant
to
be
an
initial
discussion
about
a
way
for
zekes
dow
to
get
more
active
in
uns
governance
and
particularly
to
delegate
the
voting
rights
of
deke
styles,
46,
296
ens
tokens
to
caneyfork.e
to
vote
on
its
behalf.
A
There
would
kind
of
need
to
be
some
logistics
on
how
this
worked
out,
but
I
thought
it'd
be
good
to
just
kind
of
get
the
conversation
started
here.
I
don't
think
I
need
to
tell
people
how
important
ens
is
to
deekstow.
You
know
we
rely
on
it
for
so
many
different
things
in
terms
of
products
and
really
just
yeah.
It's
it's
a
core
piece
of
infrastructure
that
that
deke
style
relies
on,
but
it's
also,
I
think,
one
of
the
best
really
especially
non-financial
application
that
crypto
has
has
had.
A
E
A
Of
attending
some
calls
and
then
also
talking
with
like
neiman,
a
lot
from
asteroids
who
was
really
involved
kind
of
in
ens
governance,
especially
on
a
couple
initiatives,
and
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
detail
can
do
in
terms
of
its
position
or
what
is
the
platform?
What
is
dxdow
trying
to
do
in
ens
governance?
A
Not
really,
then
people
talk
about
how
bad
the
dot
link
service
is
like
they're
not
focused
at
all
about,
like
ens
as
a
hosting
service
they're,
really
not
thinking
about
the
people
building
on
top
of
ens,
and
I
think
that's
like
a
big
voice
that
will
grow
in
in
governance
right
now.
If
you
see
most
of
the
activity
in
governance,
it's
like
led
by
the
core
devs
who
still
work
for
true
name
limited.
A
So
I
think
dick
style
could
help
lead
that,
along
with
like
the
eth
limo
folks,
so
we
have
great
relationship
with
neiman
from
asteroids.
That's
like
a
decentralized
search
engine
for
the
d
web
and
then
yeah.
I
think,
of
course,
like
thinking
about
how
neemy
fits
into
this,
like
mimi,
of
course,
would
be.
A
very
big
beneficiary
of
ens
is
maybe
kind
of
working
with
them.
So
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
to
like
build
that
yeah.
A
A
C
Yeah,
it
will
be
interesting
to
later
explore
other
options
of
how
we
can
use
our
ens
governance
rights
without
relying
on
canny
ford
at
eth.
Right
now
seems
like
a
good
first
solution,
but
not
ideal.
Far
from
ideal.
We
don't
want
to
rely
on
any
centralized
ownership
to
to
execute
decisions
in
behalf
of
the
dow
right.
So
later
it
will
be
all
it
will
be
awesome
to
explore.
I
think
this
will
be
a
responsibility
from
the
governance
team,
so
yeah.
C
We
should
once
that,
once
this
happens,
we
should
talk
with
ross
and
see
how
we
can
find
out
a
way
to
yeah
to
eventually
take
ownership
of
of
the
governance
right
and
execute
it
directly
from
the
dow,
but
for
now
seems
like
a
good
first
solution,
but
not
ideal.
Well,
we
should
explore
later
other
way
of
doing
it.
B
A
All
of
like
the
on-chain
stuff,
it's
more
about
a
way
of
of
figuring
out.
What's
going
on
in
ens
and
like
yeah,
I
would
actually
prefer
if
the
end
vote
was
actually
through
rep
holders
and
not
through
candy
fork,
because
I
I'm
interested
kind
of
just
furthering
d
styles
interest
there,
but
like
because
all
the
tokens
would
be
takes
down.
I
would
you
know
it
would
be
what
deke
style
wants
so
yeah
having
it
come
directly
from
the
dow,
of
course,
would
be
preferable.
F
I
I
think
it
would
make
it
easier
to
proceed
with
something
like
this.
If
we
had
like
a
fleshed-out
operational
protocol,
how
it
will
actually
work
like
if
a
proposal
appears
in
in
the
ens
now
forum,
how
do
you
poll
the
sentiment
of
dxdow
and
how
do
you
proceed
from
the
results
of
it,
whether
it
has
a
unanimous
decision
on
a
topic
or
is
divided
or
or
doesn't
really
have
an
opinion?
A
A
Even
when
they've
like
come
up
to
a
big
vote,
it
is
like
a
little
bit
of
a
build
up,
so
hopefully
that
conversation
starts
like
early
and
deep
down
is
like
having
the
internal
conversation
about
what
it
thinks
about
the
situation
even
before
there
is
a
proposal
there,
but
yeah
I
mean
the
signaling
element,
I
think
isn't
is
important
like
I
guess
you
could
do
an
on-chain
vote,
but
then
the
problem
with
unjade
vote
is
like.
Well,
you
do
the
unchained
vote.
Does
it
run
over
the
same
period
as
the
other
ones?
A
C
A
D
That's
it.
This
idea
is,
is
good
and
ties
in
it's
a
different
flavor
of
things.
We've
talked
about
a
bunch
in
the
past,
like
originally
dx
dow
had
dmm
token
and
was
was
planning
to
and
wanted
to
be,
a
governor
in
that
system.
That
system
didn't
have
a
lot
of
governance,
and
it
also
we
had
some
technical
limitations
where
the
dow
holding
the
tokens.
D
D
We
also
yeah
we
happen
to
hold
the
cns
token
and
we
happen
to
hold
other
tokens
that
will,
like
a
work
token,
will
eventually
be
governance
in
the
in
the
opolis
work
ecosystem.
As
the
as
the
thing
gets
turned
over
to
the
to
the
commons
or
the
dow,
it's
currently
being
looked
after
by
a
board
of
stewards,
but
probably
in
the
next
year
it
will
be
turnover
and
then
there
will
be
a
dow
there,
whether
there's
a
delegation
mechanism
of
the
token
there's
already
a
staking
mechanism
which
we
are
losing
out
on
so
exploring.
D
So
that's
another
variation
of
of
this
and
then,
if
we
were
ever
to
do,
you
know
token
swap
with
like
an
aligned
partner
or
something
you
would,
let's
say,
for
example,
gnosis,
and
we
had
a
bunch
of
gno
likely
we'd
want
to
pri
practice
governance.
The
excel
would
want
to
practice
governance
into
the
gnosis
dow
ecosystem,
and
we
need
to
figure
out
how
how
it
could
use
the
gno
tokens
to
to
do
that
and
that
may
have
to,
and
if
that
doesn't
have
delegation
either.
Then
you'd
have
to
figure
out
a
mechanism
to
do
that.
D
E
C
A
D
A
Okay,
next
discussion
item
is
level
k,
worker
proposal
and
payout
for
september
21
and
october
21
late
submission.
So
this
is
posted
by
john,
I
think
eight
days
ago.
So
I
imagine
this
will
be
a
discussion
here
so
john,
do
you
want
to
just
kind
of
kick
kick
things
off
and
and
frame
where
you're,
where
you're
coming
from
here.
E
Sure
thing
yeah.
Obviously
this
is
pretty
bad.
I
take
responsibility
for
this
failure
to
get
these
proposals
up
before
this
time.
It's
been
a
while
it
kind
of
started,
as
I
explained
here
with
the
arbitrary
deployment.
As
I
think
many
people
know,
the
governance
base
failed
and
we
had
to
redeploy
everything
which
I
was
coordinating
and
that's
sort
of
how
I
started
to
get
behind
and
I
sort
of
just
let
it
hang
for
too
long.
E
It
became
a
bigger
issue
and
I
was
always
prioritizing
other
things
so
here
I
am
trying
to
catch
up
on
that,
and
I
put
a
poll
at
the
bottom
about
whether
people
you
know
how
much
penalty,
if
people
think
there
should
be
some
kind
of
a
financial
penalty
for
being
late.
I'm
I'm
curious
about
that,
and
if,
depending
on
how
this
flows,
my
plan
was
to
kind
of
take
the
average
or
whatever
and
then
use
that
in
the
proposal,
but
yeah,
that's
kind
of
where
I
am
with
this.
A
C
After
all
this
happened-
and
I
saw
all
the
all
the
late
worker
proposals-
and
I
think,
what's
the
beginning
of
the
week,
where
I
fill
out
the
form
that
melanie
that
men
and
share
regarding
how
should
we
treat
late
worker
proposals
and
yeah,
I
like
to
work
on
engagement
that
are
essentially
working
on
on
the
exiled
things
that
haven't
been
approved.
It
doesn't
mean
that
they
are
not
important
things.
In
fact,
all
the
work
that
john
did
was
yeah
and
is
very
important,
but
it
is
without
the
the
dow
approval,
which
is
the.
C
C
Are
they
active
workers,
and
I
am
and
the
answer
to
that
question
for
me-
was
no
and
then
I
realized
that
sean
right
now
for
me,
I
cannot
recognize
him
as
an
active
worker
because
he
hasn't
been
validated
on
the
dow
level
by
on
11
or
or
11
or
10
months.
It
doesn't
mean
that
the
work
that
john
did
wasn't
important,
but
he
went
over
the
the
governance
process,
a
governance
process
that
he
defended
a
lot
of
times
in
in
in
very
passionate
discussion.
C
So
I
I
think
we
both
of
us
see
the
importance
of
this
process,
which
is
which
what
we
give
us
the
respect
and
honesty
on
on
the
dao.
If
you
are
an
assertive
member,
you
have
the
dow
approval
right
on
execute
your
responsibilities
and
goals
and
eventually
later
get
paid.
So
this
is
why
I
that,
right
now,
I
don't
recognize
john
as
an
active
worker
till
he
doesn't
solve
all
these
issues.
Obviously,
all
these
late
worker
proposals
right
and
decide
on
where
he
should
be
working
next.
C
This
happened
to
me
in
the
past
I
was
on.
I
was
on
the
other
side
in
march
2021
I
was,
and
I
ended
up
being
paid
less
by
a
proposal
that
wasn't
able
to
be
boosted,
and
it
was
very
hard
for
me
after
that,
after
strong
arguments
with
john
and
geronimo
that
I
saw
the
call
yesterday
and-
and
I
realized
that
they
have
been
defending
this
for
since
forever
and
now
he's
not
fulfilling
it.
C
I've
been
working
with
everyone,
but
after
that
I
was
like
fully
on
and
it
was
involved
in
the
governance
process,
and
I
like
it.
I
think
this
is
what
make
what
makes
it
out
great,
that
we
all
decide
and
validate
each
other's
work
and
eventually
give
us
the
chance
to
work
in
the
game
in
a
more
comfortable
and
healthy
environment.
Okay,
I'm
doing
what
my
what
my
co-workers
wants
me
to
do.
I
ain't
helping
them
or
what
I
what
they
want
me
to
help.
C
C
C
We
are
as
important
as
organization
and
that
time,
when
I
got
paid
less
it,
I
realized
that
that
wasn't
that
bad.
That
again
I
I
know
so
important,
I'm
not
I'm
not
the
best
developer
and
the
only
developer.
You
know
I
don't
have
to
do
everything,
and
then
I
start
realizing
that,
okay,
how
I
want
to
be
the
expo.
I
want
other
people
to
work
on
it.
C
I
want
to
give
it
to
other
developers
and
that
eventually
did
that
to
now
dxo,
with
a
lot
of
developers
working
on
smart
contracts
and
eventually,
I'm
not
essential
anymore.
I
can
leave
it
out
now,
and
this
is
going
to
continue
working,
which
feels
awesome.
I
will
have
no
guilt
in
leaving
and
deep
something
burning.
E
D
E
Would
have
prioritized
this
earlier,
but
I'm
trying
to
rectify
that
now
and
and
yeah.
I
definitely
value
your
opinion.
Augusto
we've
done
a
lot
of
good
work
together
and
yeah
I
mean
I
maybe
was
a
little
critical
of
you
back
in
early
21.
So
I
think
it's
totally
fair
that
you're
critical
of
of
me
and
where
I
may
have
kind
of
had
let
things
lapse
here.
So
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
fair.
Just
to
clarify
that
the
conversation
back
then
wasn't
about
your
proposals
being
late.
E
A
E
Under
understand
that
and
that's
why
it's
a
bad,
you
know
if,
if
I'm
in
a
leadership
role
and
or
setting
an
example
here,
this
is
a
bad
example
to
set
right,
which
is
why
I
want
to
do
everything
I
can
to
make
this
right
here
and
again.
I
I
meant
no
disrespect
right,
like
I
basically
operate
in
a
pretty
simple
way
right,
like
since
the
beginning
since
before
dxdow
had
any
money.
F
B
F
F
F
E
To
me
on
the
recorded
public
call,
so
let
me
let
me
address
them
so,
like
the
the
first
thing
you're
talking
about-
and
this
is
unfortunate-
that
it's
kind
of
coming
out
this
way.
So
there
is
a,
I
wouldn't
say
it's
a
vulnerability.
It's
a
failure
of
the
front
end
to
recognize
the
way
the
dow
stack
contracts,
work
and
big,
and
so
it's
on
my
to-do
list,
which
is
backlogged
and
a
reason
why
I
had
been
behind
on
this
right
so
like
I
am
intending
to
get
to
writing
this
up.
E
To
be
honest,
he's
not
a
technical
person
by
training,
but
he's
willing
to
like
get
in
there
and
like
ask
questions,
and
so
what
he
realized.
We
could
look
at
this,
and
but
it's
it's
basically
like
there's
this
extra
field
in
dao
stack,
which
is
like
the
period
in
the
number
of
times
and
effectively.
E
I
had
a
note
about
this
like
this-
was
like
my
my
kind
of
like
kind
of
pit
in
my
stomach
when
I
woke
up
and
saw
dave
talking
about
this,
because
it's
like
my
worst
nightmare
that
the
treasury
could
get
drained
and
and
downstack
had
never
like
not
made
us
aware
of
this.
You
know
like
our
developer
team,
like
didn't
catch
it
right
so
and,
like
you
know,
take
some
responsibility
there.
E
So
the
thing
that's
on
my
to-do
list
is
to
write
this
up,
and
I
was
I
talked
to
dave
and
some
of
the
folks
in
like
what
I'm
planning
to
still
planning
to
do
is
suggest
that
dave
gets
a
20
000
like
bounty.
We
don't
have
an
explicit
bug
bounty
for
this
right,
so
it
would
be
more
of
like
recognition
for
the
value
that
this
this
provides
and
like
kind
of
setting
a
good
faith
precedent
for
for
other
people
and
like
showing
that
the
excel
like
will
value
you.
A
E
E
E
F
Yeah
I
mean
especially,
I
think
john
is
like
pretty
focused
on,
like
fixing
the
he
basically
created
by
not
making
proposals
right,
like
I
think,
having
such
a
backup
of
proposals
requires
some
time
to
like
write
down
exactly
what
he
did.
So
I
think
there
needs
to
be
some
understanding
in
terms
of
what
you
actually
like
right
now
can
deliver
on
stuff
right.
A
A
Adam
was
just
saying
it
then,
because
yeah
I
mean,
I
think,
the
real
reason
people
aren't
bringing
things
up.
John,
is
because
you
kind
of
intimidate
people
and
bully
them
into
not
speaking
out
right.
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
tension
on
this
call
right
here
that
people
can
kind
of
feel
it
and
everyone's
afraid
of
like
kind
of
saying
something
that
may
cause
like.
E
Well,
I'm
not
really
sure
what
you're
referring
to
when
you
say
bullying,
but
I
did
just
get
accused
of
ignoring
the
treasury
and
blackmailing
a
team,
both
of
which
are
false
accusations
on
a
public
call.
So
if
I
would
say
that's
pretty
unprofessional
and
bullying
activity-
and
I
don't
know
what
you're
talking
about
when
you're
saying
that
I'm
intimidating
people
are
bullying
people.
I've
been
working
with
most
folks
here
for
a
long
time.
So
I
guess
that's-
maybe
a
different
discussion
on
the
nemi
thing
to
address
that
as
well.
E
E
I
got
to
a
point
where
I
felt
uncomfortable
just
giving
neemi.eth
to
the
mimi
multisig,
and
so
I
told
the
mimi
team
that
I'm
going
to
give
it
to
dxdow,
which
I
tried
to
do
last
week,
but
the
ens
app
like
doesn't
work
and
again
I
am
backlogged.
So
I'm
like
not
blackmailing
anybody,
I'm
going
to
give
it
to
the
tao,
and
I
don't
see
why
there's
any
reason
to
believe.
I
wouldn't
make
good
on
that.
Given
my
track
record
with
the
doe.
B
B
So
I
think
there
was
a
bit
of
a
heat
in
the
moment
and
I
personally
don't
see
that
the
dx
down
necessarily
owns
the
enf,
but
that's
a
separate
discussion
and
I
I
don't
really
have
a
problem
with
the
dxtile
owning
the
ens
but
yeah.
I
don't
see
the
logic
behind
why
the
dsl
owns
it,
particularly
considering
that
the
neem
you
paid
for
it
and
then
the
mimi
multisig
paid
you
back
for
it
with
the
prize
winnings.
We
got.
E
Well,
right
and
those
prize
winnings
include
a
thousand
dollars
that
were
my
prize
winnings
right.
So
like
this
is
this
argument.
Line
of
argument
is
new
to
me
and
net.
I
think
I've
contributed
eight
hundred
dollars
to
the
neemy
multisig
right,
and
I've
also
expressed
that
I
don't
intend
to
be
on
the
the
team,
because
I
have
other
responsibilities,
so
I
think
yeah.
E
E
We
were
in
amsterdam
using
dx
stipend
money
like
we,
you
know,
have
basically
had
full
support
and
we're
like
supposedly
on
one
team
together
here
at
dx
tao,
and
it
only
makes
sense
to
me
that,
like
that
should
be
honored
and
respected,
and
I
felt
like
that
wasn't
happening.
So
in
my
mind,
the
right
thing
to
do
is
to
give
dx
dao
the
name,
because
then
it's
at
least
up
to
doubt
governance
on
on
how
things
proceed,
I'm
not
single-handedly
like
deciding
what
leverage
that
that
will
have
right
like
by
handing
it
over.
C
C
Yeah,
but
they
said
this
is
a
these
are
thing
where
I
agree
with
you
that
it
might
belong
to
the
exile.
What
was
created
on
a
hackathon,
supported
by
by
the
exile
members,
but
eventually
would
be
for
them
to
decide
because
they
created
they
know
the
product.
The
exau
knows
nothing
about
nimi
right,
the
ones
that
created
it.
C
They
they
own
it
and
they
are
the
exile
members,
so
their
respect
and
an
ownership
and
and
I'm
belonging
to
that
is
a
stake,
because
if
they
do
something
else
or
nimi,
that
is
not
beneficial
of
the
exile.
I
would
say
why
I
won't.
I
don't
want
to
use
this
this
work,
it
might
sound
heavy,
but
has
treason
because
they
use
the
exhaust
fans
to
go
to
a
hackathon
create
something
for
their
own
benefit.
C
E
No,
no!
No!
This
is
what
I'm
saying.
I
felt
a
little
bit
of
what
you're
describing
right
that
this
is
not
really
right
like
it
needs
to
be
decided
by
the
doubt.
So
it
hasn't
happened
yet
because
the
app
doesn't
work.
But
my
intent-
and
I'm
saying
it
here
on
a
public
recorded
call,
so
you
can
point
to
it
later.
I'm
going
to
send
eb.edu
to
the
dow
and
then
we
can
have
the
vote
in
the
decision
as
to
like
what
should
happen
with
nemi.
E
C
A
C
E
C
B
C
B
I
don't
think
you
were
gonna
us
over
extremely
right,
like
you
were
kind
enough
to
at
least
set
the
controller
to
the
multisig,
and
you
know
I'm
hopeful
and
given
that
you
said
it
now
trust
that
you'll
you'll
send
it
to
the
dxo
and
then
I'm
happy
to
let
dick
style
make
that
decision.
But
I
think
there's
a
disagreement
in
how
we
thought
the
ownership
was
right
between.
F
F
You
guys
had
different
expectations
and
now
they're
colliding
from
my
point
of
view,
like
I
think
john,
is
protecting
the
interests
of
the
dx
now,
and
it
seems
like,
like
there's,
also
like
a
signal
for
less
commitment
from
the
other
side.
Right
like
these
are
like.
I
think
everyone
will
be
happy
that
mimi
is
going
like
their
own
path
to
like
execute
on
like
create
a
great
product,
but
also
like
yeah.
I
think
that's
like
also
a
signal
for
less
commitment
for
geek,
so
itself.
A
Yeah
and
I
think
the
reason
it
was
brought
up
by
adam
if
we
can
just
rewind
the
clock
was
because
he
his
words,
accused
john
of
blackmail,
and
this
is
kind
of,
I
think,
part
of
the
pattern
that
we
see
in
kind
of
some
of
john
jamers.
I
don't
know
the
specifics
of
the
thing
I
think
is
not
important
in
terms
of
how
that
plays
out
it's
more
of
it's
another
data
point
in
this
and
john,
I
think
before
you
kind
of
come
at
me.
A
I've
talked
with
10
contributors
in
the
last
week
who
are
scared
of
speaking
out
against
you,
like,
I
hope
I
don't
recall,
like
the
contributor
x
call
in
may,
where
you
know
I
thought
you
were
talking
completely
inappropriate,
yelling
at
sky
first
in
the
key
base
and
then
on
the
call,
and
then
you
yelled
at
me
in
front
of
like
everyone
and
that's
been.
You
know
three
months
and
I
haven't
heard
anything
from
you.
A
You
haven't
acknowledged
that
in
any
way-
and
I
think
everyone
on
the
call
has
these
experiences
of
just
like
aggressive
john
behavior
and
that's
what
I
think
we
need
to
kind
of
like
focus
on
here
is
like
how
can
we
change
that?
How
can
you
kind
of
understand
that
there's
been
like
this
kind
of
culture?
I
don't
know
of
like
fear
and
intimidation
where
we're
not
open
to,
like
speaking
it
out
as
much
people
aren't
like
bringing
their
ideas
to
the
forefront
because
they're
afraid
I
think,
of
how
you're
going
to
react
there.
A
A
E
Well,
if
that's
the
big
problem,
it's
not
something
that
has
come
up
yet
on
this
call.
So
I
think
your
comment's,
a
little
incongruous
with
the
discussion
and
in
your
words,
you're
saying
that
adam's
accusation
of
blackmail
is
part
of
a
pattern
which
makes
it
sound
like
you.
Two
are
accusing
me
of
blackmail
which
no.
A
A
Right
and
it's
I
mean
I
mean
I'm
not
counting
on
people
to
come
out
on
this
public
call,
and
you
know,
volunteer
and
say
this
information,
but,
like
I
know
it's
out
there,
and
I
think
everyone
can
kind
of
feel
it
and
just
because
it
hasn't
come
up
to
you
and
just
because
you've
kind
of
maybe
intimidated
people
into
doing
things
doesn't
mean
it's
there.
Just
to
give
like
another
example.
A
I've
had
a
couple
people
reach
out
to
me
because
john
dm
them
about
liking
a
post
on
dow
talk
right,
and
it
was
a
post
of
mine
that
I
replied
to
his
right
and
so
he's
going
around
looking
at
people's
likes,
trying
to
intimidate
them
from
speaking
out
further.
I
think
this
is
the
behavior
that
again
creates
like
a
toxic
culture.
In
the
extent
I.
E
E
I
asked
him:
can
you
give
me
more
color
on
this,
because
your
post
was
kind
of
attacking
me
and
I
wanted
to
understand
like
like
why
he
liked
that
I
don't
see
why
that's
bad
I'm
actually
actively
trying
to
seek
discussion
and
discourse
there,
but
can
we
just
clarify?
Are
you
accusing
me
of
blackmail
or
no
me
yeah,
you,
you
said
it
at
the
beginning?
Okay.
So
no
so,
let's
just.
A
E
E
A
It's
john
because
you've
you've
obstructed
the
governance
process
for
a
year.
There's
a
lot
to
dive
into
this
is
the
time
we
give
this
feedback
and
we
haven't
been
able
to
give
this
feedback
because
you
haven't
put.
This
is
what
I'm
working
on.
These
are
my
reflections,
so
we
can.
We
can
kind
of
do
that
so,
like
yeah.
This
is
like
taking
everyone's
time
right
now,
and
it
is
a
lot
and
it's
kind
of
tough
to
figure
out
where
it
is.
I
know
I've
kind
of
talked
a
little
bit
so
yeah,
gusto
or
john.
A
C
Is
that
what
the
dog
wants
right?
And
we
will
see
this
on
chain
when
a
proposal
is
submitted.
So
it
would
be
great
to
start
getting
some
clarification
here
on
getting
some
proposal
on
chain.
Regarding
the
lesson
missions,
where
we
can
vote
on
resolving
this
and
then
keep
future
future
engagement
right
and
everyone
will
be
able
to
vote
to
vote
on
chain,
they
don't
have
to
speak
here.
We
don't
want
to
speak
a
publicly.
C
It's
very
it's
very
hard,
it's
not
for
everyone,
it's
very
it's
very
hard
for
me
to
right
and
and
yeah.
Let's,
let's
show
our
let's
say
what
we
think
if
we
want
to,
if
we
frequent
for
the
and
if
we
don't,
we
are,
we
are
going
to
vote
on
chain
and
the
decision
will
have
to
be
respected
and
it
would
have
to
be
as
honest
as
possible.
This
is
what
is
going
to.
This
is
what
the
dao
is
built
upon,
honest
and
respect
and
well,
of
course,
communication
of
everything.
So
as
long
as
we.
C
We
are
going
to,
we
are
going
to
be
getting
along
fine.
I
think
right
so
this
I
would
say,
let's
stop
on
on
this
now,
john,
if,
if
you
think
that,
if
you
want
to
say
something
else,
but
I
think
that
it
would
be
great
to
see
a
proposal
like
closing
this
laser
mission,
where
you
did
very
valuable
work
in
my
opinion
and
and
then
we
figure
out
the
rest,
I
mean
your
future.
C
B
C
F
Yeah
and
augustus
is
a
great
example
for
how
to
do
it
like
there
are
several
parts
how
to
like.
Now,
it's
the
time
to
give
feedback,
because
john
needs
to
listen
to
that
feedback
and
make
sure
that
he's
like
even
ratifying
that
on
on
the
next
proposal,
he's
going
to
submit
for,
like
future
work,
augusta.
F
Had
the
balls
wrote
down
his
views
and
I
respect
that,
that's
how
you
should
do
it
and
I,
like
I'm
requesting
for
everyone
who
has
problems
with
john
to
come
out
like
in
any
way
right
now,
like
chris,
had
discussion
or
like
talks
with
several
folks
and
those
folks
who
actually
need
to
like
send
the
signal
here.
Okay,
feedback.
C
C
F
C
A
E
Well,
well,
first,
I
want
to
say
if
anybody
does
have,
you
know
something
that
they
don't
feel
like
they
can
communicate.
Well
with
me,
I'm
committed
to
trying
to
address
that.
I
actually
had
a
good
conversation
with
melanie
this
morning.
I
think,
if
it's,
if
it
is
uncomfortable,
I
I
mean
I
assume
it's
gonna
be
uncomfortable
talking
on
a
public
call
if
you
feel
this
way.
E
So
this
now
is
not
the
time
or
the
venue,
but
if
you
do
feel
that
way,
first
of
all,
like
I
won't
bite,
feel
free
to
to
voice
your
opinions
to
me
if
you're
uncomfortable
with
that,
I'm
sure
melanie
would
be
very
supportive
of
of
helping
you
voice
that
overlaying
it
or
or
trying
to
address
it
in
some
way
as
contributor
x.
For
you
chris,
I
mean,
as
you
say,
clearly,
there's
been
a
loss
of
of
trust.
E
You
know
like
when
I
recruited
you
to
dx
taos,
because
I
thought
you
know
you
could
add
a
lot
of
value
with
your
knowledge
of
defy
and
your
ability
to
coordinate
things.
You
know
it's
sad
to
me
that
it's
coming
out
this
way
and-
and
it
seems
like
maybe
something
else-
is
there's
a
deeper
resentment
here.
Hopefully
we
can
get
past
that,
but
but
yeah
I
just
I
want
to
move
forward
and
fix
things
and
build,
but
that's.