►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-12-08]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Welcome
to
geek
style
governance,
discussion
for
wednesday
december
8th
2021
at
1600
utc.
Let's
start
first
with
the
proposal
roundup,
I
will
share
my
screen
here.
B
Cool
so
starting
first
with
mainnet,
so
you
can
see
the
proposal
at
the
top
here.
There's
three
swapper
campaigns
that
are
being
launched
along
with
the
swapper
funding
proposal.
This
was
actually
submitted
last
tuesday,
so
we
talked
about
it
a
little
bit
on
on
this
call
last
tuesday
last
wednesday,
but
this
is
for
epochs
five
through
eight
for
mainnet
farming,
and
I
remember
a
reminder
that
mainnet
farming
farming,
the
epochs,
are
being
combined
to
save
gas
costs.
B
So
looks
like
these:
will
both
these
all
three
of
these
will
pass
in
14
hours
and
then,
of
course,
we'll
need
to
execute
this
one
first,
so
that
the
swapper
will
be
in
the
relayer
for
the
campaigns
to
launch,
and
so
this
we
do
have
a
somewhat
tight
time
frame
on
this,
because
these
need
to
get
executed
before
the
campaigns
launch
tomorrow.
B
So
this
is
in
14
hours,
so
I
guess
that's
kind
of
the
middle
of
the
night
u.s
time
I
will
definitely
be
up
tomorrow
morning
to
make
sure
that
they
get
executed,
but
something
we
should
be
watching
here,
especially
before
the
gas
price
spikes
in
the
middle
of
the
day.
U.S
time.
B
Cool
and
then
there
is
a
transfer
owl
to
x,
die
for
liquidity
provisioning.
I
actually
think
we
might
have
talked
about
this
last
week
too.
It
had
a
boosting,
it
had
to
get
re-up
in
there,
but
this
is
because
there's
ten
thousand
out
ten
thousand
dollars
worth
of
owl
in
the
dxl
treasury
on
mainnet,
and
we
actually
need
al
to
run
or
notice.
Protocol
v1
actually
needs
al
to
run.
The
way
it's
it's
made
is
like
trades
have
to
happen.
B
If
you're
doing
a
dxd
west
trade,
you
need
to
have
a
dxd
owl
and
a
without
trade,
and
the
owl
is
like
a
fee
for
the
solvers
there.
So
since
we
have
somehow,
this
is
being
used
up
for
that,
and
then
next
is
the
staking
1000
each
signal
and
transfer
of
funds.
B
I
believe
the
signal
proposing
x
I
just
passed
or
is
about
to
pass
we
get
to
that
second,
so
this
would
be
that
this
is
the
main
net
proposal,
and
then
it
also
actually
includes
the
transfer
of
500
eth,
which
is
about
half
of
them,
which
is
a
half
of
the
thousand.
B
I
did
oh
I'm
on
link.
I've
been
using.limo
a
lot
more.
I
think
it
might
be
better
than
dot
link.
The
only
reason
I
don't
use
it
for
this
is
because
it
has
that
big
testing
environment
thing
up
here,
because
it's
not
that.
B
Yeah,
I
can
go
off
of
the
agenda
one
while
that's
loading
there,
so
in
xdi
base
there
is
a
rep
transfer
proposal
for
dave
for
fluid
drop,
so
david
set
up
a
new
address,
and
so
there's
two
proposals
here
there
is
a
let's
try,
a
limo.
B
Actually,
there
is
a
mint
and
a
burn
proposal,
and
I
guess
there's
actually
not
an
easy
way
to
do
this
in
a
like
one
way
that
you
just
kind
of
you
don't
really
transfer
the
wrap,
you
burn
it
and
then
mix
it
again
and
then
next
up
there
is
an
unwrap
or
is
it
a
unwrap
one
xdi
test
transaction?
B
So
some
of
you
will
recall
that
when
we
transferred
the
the
last
transferred
to
x
to
x
dive
base
the
transfer
a
lot
of
the
transfers
actually
put
in
wx
die.
This
is
because
we
thought
we
were
going
to
be
using
the
new
schemes
in
order
to
pay
workers
so
to
have
the
schemes
you
can't
use
the
native
token.
You
need
a
wrapped
version
of
it,
but
there
has
this.
B
We
had
some
problems
with
the
schemes
on
on
the
proposals
before
so
most
people
are
still
requesting
x,
die
and
there's
actually
not
that
much
x
die
in
there.
So
this
proposal-
I
think
it
is
this
one.
So
I'm
in
a
different
order
is
a
test
of
that
and
then
there's
actually
a
proposal
that
I
think
is
was
just
submitted
yesterday.
That
will
unwrap,
I
think,
500
000
wx
die.
B
This
is
through
the
multi-call,
so
there
actually
shouldn't
be
a
there's
not
like
a
funding
proposal
like
no
funds
are
really
like
changing
anything.
It
is
just
something
from
the
multi
multi
call
there
and
dave
has
simulated
this
on
tenderly
and
it
went,
went
through
yeah
and
then
like
on
on
mainnet.
We
have
the
swapper
campaigns
here,
so
you
can
see,
there's
actually
a.
B
There
is,
I
think,
seven
campaigns
that
are
being
launched
from
xdi
and
then
there
is
a
some
carrot
campaigns
that
are
also
being
launched
in
conjunction
keenan.
Maybe
you
can
just
kind
of
explain,
maybe
where
we're
at
on
this-
why
this
is
loading
again
here,
so
there's
a
funding
proposal
that
is
being
sent.
The
sending
swapper
to
the
multi-sig
to
create
care
campaigns.
Is
that
correct.
E
Yes,
so
we
have
a
smaller
send
being
sent
to
the
multi-sig,
I
believe
for
steak
and
rice
they
were
both
supposed
to
have
dual
rewards:
I'm
not
100
percent
on
steak.
I
believe
that
might
not
so
the
multi-sigma
you
set
up
a
regular
swapper
reward
program
with
that
pair.
Then
we
have
a
second
funding
proposal
for
the
relayer.
We
had
to
move
some
funds
off
the
relay
or
to
to
move
some
funds
to
the
multisig.
E
B
Cool
and
just
like
with
mainnet,
we'll
need
to
make
sure
these
get
executed
before
the
campaigns
start
tomorrow.
There.
E
Yeah-
and
I
I
just
sat
down-
maybe
you
mentioned
this,
but
it
is
worth
noting
that
the
funding
proposals
would
need
to
be
executed
before
the
campaign
proposals.
Otherwise
they
will
fail
me
and
chris
are
already
planning
to
take
care
of
this,
but
would
suggest
avoiding
execution
unless
you
know
what
you're
doing
here,
yeah.
B
Cool
and
then
some
other
proposals,
there
is
a
proposal
from
zabo
strategies
with
his
nisa.
This
is
her
off-boarding
proposal.
There
was
a
discussion
in
the
forum
the
last
couple
weeks
on
that,
and
then
there
is
a
this
is
actually,
I
believe,
yeah.
This
is
federico's
proposal
I
had
staked
on
it.
I'm
not
sure
why
it's
not
picking
up
that
there
and
that's
gonna
pass
in
a
day
there.
B
And
then
we
have
adam
adam's
retroactive
contributor
proposal,
so
this
is
anything
for
the
last
couple
weeks.
I'm
sorry
last
couple
months
here
and
then
we
have
the
dxd
buyback
extension
number
four
signal
proposal
good
to
see
some
votes
on
this
just
a
couple
hours
ago.
It's
still
at
the
point,
zero
five
percent-
so
maybe
it
would
be-
would
be
good
to
see
some
support
for
for
this
and
the
program
there's
also
the
corresponding
one
on
on
mainnet.
B
And
then
there
is
xdc
buyback
order.
89.
there's
also
another
88
here
that
you
cannot
see
it
because
it's
yeah,
it
didn't
pick
up
the
ipfs
there,
but
so
there's
88.89
and
then
90
is
being
boosted.
Now
and
then
yes,
here's
the
unwrapped
500
w
500,
000
wx
die,
wrap
text
die
and
then
we
have
a
couple
fun
ones.
I
guess
we
have
xerox,
clumps
eat
sticker
reimbursement
and
no
kena
did
not
spend
200
billion
usdc
on
stickers.
E
Yeah
there
was
a
the
first
one
I
submitted.
I
completely
glossed
over
uscc's
six
decimals,
so
there
was
a
lot
of
usdc
being
requested.
I'm
not
sure
where
that
proposal
is
now.
I
upstate
it
originally
and
also
down
synced
it.
If
you
want
some
free
gen,
then
you
can
probably
go
for
that
one
yeah.
I
think
I
did
down
stake
it
too.
B
B
Yeah-
and
I
think
that
was
it
for
x-sty-
oh
sorry,
there
was
a
late-breaking
proposal
on
xdi
that
was
just
submitted.
I
think
in
the
last
hour
sky,
do
you
wanna.
B
G
Is
that
the
right
amount,
or
does
that
make
a
keenan
mistake?.
G
So
w
is
w
x
die
because
it's
going
to
a
multi-sig,
so
it
has
to
be
an
erc20
right.
You
can't
use
x-tie
and
it
is
the
proposal
to
action.
The
movement
of
ten
thousand
wx
die
to
an
initiative,
dao
multisig
and
yeah
all
the
details.
G
Basically
from
the
forum
discussions
and
the
discussions
we
had
on
the
on
the
call
on
the
on
the
different
calls
which
we
talked
about
for
a
while
and
we've
raised
some
questions
and
some
concerns
and
some
processes
try
to
summarize
all
of
the
outcomes
of
that
into
some
guidelines,
and
some
I
mean
I
can
maybe.
I
should
also
post
the
text
of
it
to
the
forum
thread.
Just
so,
it's
more
clear
if
the
ipfs
isn't
going
to
be
loading
but
yeah,
it's
it's
basically
creating
some
general
guidelines.
G
It's
pretty
wide
and
open,
but
it
will
allow
us
to
get
initiative.
Dow
going
and
initiative
doubt
couldn't
can
continue
to
evolve
and
it's
just
a
multi-sig,
but
maybe
it
can
become
a
dao
or
a
guild.
But
we'll
have
some
some
money
there
and
there
is
some
delegation
to
people
that
want
to
be
part
of
initiative.
G
Dow
to
make
decisions
on
on
different
initiators
requests
for
funding
and
then
there's
also
some
notes
about
like
kind
of
risk,
protect
protection
so,
like
some
general
guidelines
around
what
like
what
would
be
factor
in
when
giving
money
to
someone.
G
So
if
some,
like
some
random
wallet
address,
that
has
some
idea
that,
like
there's,
zero
knowledge
of
who
or
what
this
wallet
address
is
that
would
be
factored
in
as
well
and
then
also
some
guidelines
for
like
what
would
be
or
allowed
or
desired,
and
so
really
that
included,
like
you
know,
anything
that
that
is
initiated
initiated
should
like
maintain
the
core
values
of
dx
taos
like
and
and
its
manifesto.
So
and
there's
nothing
illegal
and
there's
you
know
and,
and
it
shouldn't
be
in
bad
taste.
G
So
if,
if
yeah
those
three
things
together,
I
think
should
cover
any
of
the
concerns
we
had
with
like
something
crazy
happening
and
if
it,
if
it
does,
then
we'll
have
to
learn
and
fix
it
but
yeah.
That's
that
proposal
is
live.
B
Cool
any
thing
to
add,
I
guess
I
should
be
making
an
init
joke
here,
but
any
anything
to
add
or
comments
from
from
others.
B
G
Yeah,
so
the
most
important
thing
is
anyone
here
or
anyone
that
you
think
would
be
good
or
has
ideas
encourage
those
people
to
come
and
you
know,
participate
and
bring
ideas
to
initiative
dao
the
the
yeah.
The
problem
would
be
if
we
launched
this
thing
and
then
like.
No
one
has
any
ideas
and
no
one
has
and
then
the
whole
thing
is
a
waste
of
time.
So
we
want
people
to
bring
new,
innovative
ideas.
G
D
I
I
I
guess
like
something
we
could
be
focusing
on,
is,
if
denver
and
like,
if
denver
stuff
for
like
in
the
context
of
initiative,
dao
that
might
might
help
like
frame
not
necessary
necessary,
like
you
know
what
you
we
should.
You
know
aim
for,
but
yeah
just
kind
of
like
a
frame
for
ideas.
B
B
Okay
and
then
moving
on
to
discussion
items,
I
want
to
start
first
with
the
kind
of
the
geek
style
proposal
taxonomy.
So
this
is
a
post
I
made
a
couple
days
ago:
there's
a
lot
in
it,
so
I
don't
think
we'll
kind
of
get
over
it
today,
but
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
it.
It's
just
people
can
ever
be
thinking
about
it
there
and
maybe
go
back
and
and
check
it
and
play
with
some
of
the
data
themselves.
B
So
I
think
it's
really
important
that
the
deep
stout
kind
of
have
a
holistic
view
of
what
governance
is
spending
its
time
on
right.
So
like
what
are
the
proposals
that
are
taking
up
time,
what
are
what
are?
How
do
we
have,
like
maybe
guidelines
or
precedent,
on
how
certain
proposals
will
go
through,
and
I
think
that's
kind
of
boils
down
to
categorizing
them
and
putting
on
some
like
system
for
what
are
all
these
proposals,
and
I
think
we
actually
have
a
pretty
set
of
proposals
already.
B
I
think
these
will
all
be
pretty
familiar
with
people,
but
so
I
just
kind
of
went
through
all
the
past
proposals
and
put
them
into
both
categories
and
proposal
type.
So
the
categories
are,
you
can
see
here
are
payments
treasury
signal,
rep
rewards
product
and
protocol
updates,
so
these
are
intended
to
be
able
to
capture
everything.
Geek
style
does
on
chain
right
and
so
payments
is
probably
the
most
common
one.
B
This
is
just
whatever
funds
are
coming
out
of
the
treasury
and
going
somewhere
the
most
common
one
contributor,
but
there's
also
contractors
reimbursements,
member
balancers
retro.
You
know
retroactive
bonuses.
I
also
include
swapper
farming
proposals,
because
this
is
kind
of
like
an
expense
there
and
then
yeah,
marketing
and
other
expenses.
So
that's
the
payments
category
there's
the
signal
proposal
category,
which
is
pretty
basic.
It's
just
signal
proposals
that
go
through.
I
didn't
actually
have
any
separate
proposal,
types
there
and
then
for
treasury.
You
know
these
are
the
treasury.
B
I
think
the
five
different
treasury
proposals
that
we
do
on
a
consistent
basis,
so
treasury
diversification
proposal.
So
this
is
what
we
did
really
in
the
first
half,
mostly
in
the
first
half
of
the
year,
but
a
lot
of
proposals
that
diversified
the
treasury
away
from
eth.
We
do
a
lot
of
fund
transfers.
B
You
know
this
is
transferring
to
xdx
dao
or
in
the
future
to
arbor
trump.
But
those
are
those
are
obviously
mostly
mainnet
proposals.
There's
the
buy-back
proposals
which
everyone
are
very
familiar
with:
swapper
lp
and
then
d
expenses
for
rep
rewards.
You
can
see
here
rough
boost,
rep,
sync
rep,
slash
and
then
I
think
what
maybe
the
interesting
the
most
interesting
one
probably
long
term
is
this
category
of
like
product
and
protocol
updates.
So
this
is
like
what
is
dx
out
governing.
B
That's
not
just
about
sending
funds
around,
and
so
you
know
the
big
one.
There
is
ens
right.
We
do
a
lot
of
dns
proposals
that
adjust
things:
the
geek
style
token
list,
which
has
not
been
used
as
much
but
was
used
early
on
and
then
it
can
also
serve
as
an
arbitrator
for
both
omen
and
carrot.
Marker
markets,
we
also
have
swapper
fee
change
proposals.
This
is
what
we
just
actually
executed.
B
Last
week
on
the
xgen
x,
die
pool
on
swapper
geek
style
also
controls
the
bonding
curve,
there's
a
smart
contract
that
there's
been
a
couple
proposals
there
and
then
also
scheme
modifications.
B
So
this
is
when
we're
adjusting
all
adding
new
schemes
adjusting
parameters
in
there.
So
yeah,
you
can
kind
of
see
a
breakdown
of
where
geek
style
spends.
Most
of
its
time,
as
you
can
see,
payments
is
is
by
far
the
most
a
treasury
a
quarter,
and
then
product
and
protocol
updates
are
also
pretty
significant,
and
I.
B
Of
pro
you
know
cool
just
through
I
guess
two
years,
and
in
three
and
a
half
months
there
were
1204
proposals
that
have
gone
through
either
xcx
dial,
dx,
dow
or
the
arbitrary
one
base.
So
I
guess
that's
to
do
the
math.
It's
like
two
proposals
a
day.
I
think
yeah
about
that
yeah
and
then
just
some
data
here
you
can
see
payment
proposals
by
type.
Obviously
the
contributor
is
the
is
the
most
one.
This
is
the
the
most
common
proposal
you
can
see.
It's
about.
B
A
quarter
of
all
of
our
proposals
are
just
payments
to
workers
and
you
can
see
swap
performing
this.
One
has
increased
a
lot
over
the
past
two
or
three
months,
because
we've
been
doing
so
many
proposals
to
launch
these
campaigns
thought
the
contractor
amount
was
was
interesting.
So
this
is
just
payments
that
went
through
contractors,
not
contributors.
B
You
kind
of
have
a
good
idea
of
how
we're
splitting
up
that
and
then
yeah
the
reimbursement
and
member
balancer
and
then
some
other
ones
there
and
then
yeah
and
the
product
and
protocol
update.
I
think
this
is
another
cool
one.
You
know
88
ens
update
changes.
I
guess
in
in
two
years,
which
I
think
is
a
pretty
cool
accomplishment
to
be
changing
and
updating
the
website
all
all
on
chain
there.
You
can
see.
Maybe
this
last
one
here
scheme
modification
micro
might
grow
in
the
future
a
little
bit
more.
B
B
One
thing
I
was
saying
here:
we
might
have
another
category
at
some
point
like
yield,
optimization
and
then
yeah
the
rep
proposals
by
type
you
can
see
the
number
of
rep
boosts
there
and
rep
sync.
Hopefully
this
number
rep
sync
will
go
up
over
the
coming
months
as
people
resync
their
their
rep
on
mainnet
and
then
yeah
just
kind
of
looking
at
the
the
activity
by
base.
You
know
what
is
x
guy
spending
his
time
on
when
is
mainnet.
Sending
its
time
on.
B
You
can
see
how
maynet
you
know.
Really,
I
think
in
the
future
will
con
will
be
more
and
more
ens
and
treasury
diversification
proposals,
because
that's
really
what
or
treasury
proposals.
I
guess
I
should
say
because
that's
like
its
primary
of
use
right
now
with
xdi.
I
think
this
contributor
proposal
will
go
up,
will
probably
continue
to
go
up,
but
you
know
exercise
being
used
pretty
effectively
for
both
the
contributor
payments
and
buyback,
and
then
you
can
kind
of
see
that
there-
okay,
that's
it.
B
F
I
just
think
it's
awesome,
because
I
think
it's
also
going
to
really
help
our
interfaces
be
better
because
a
lot
of
it
is
about
when
you
come
to
the
interface
like
what
is
a
lot
of
information?
How
is
it
organized
like?
Where
do
you
go?
What's
the
most
important
for
different
things
like
so?
This
is,
I
think,
really
important
for
that.
F
I
did
tweet
this
out.
I
should
have
mentioned
chris,
my
name,
but
I
just
tweeted
out,
but
I
mean
maybe
we
should
do
something
from
the
dow
twitter,
too
yeah.
B
B
B
B
Cool
okay
and
then
next
up
on
the
agenda
is,
oh
sorry,
just
a
quick
discussion.
Before
we
get
to
the
compensation
update.
I
did
have
a
signal
pro
or
draft
for
a
signal
proposal
about
dxd
investing,
so
this
would
be
it's
kind
of
as
a
spreadsheet.
B
That
ali
had
put
together
gone
back
and
looked
at
all
of
the
contributor
proposals
that
have
been
passed
on
chain
and
what
amount
of
dxd
was
awarded
or
should
have
been
issued
at
that
point,
and
so
this
is
a
spreadsheet
of
all
of
those
different
ones.
So
I'm
hoping
with
this
signal
proposal,
I
guess
the
the
point.
B
The
signal
proposal
is
building
like
okay,
dekes
dao
is
like
once
again
agreeing
to
these
issuances
and
it's
also
enabling,
like
the
deeps
gov
team,
to
be
able
to
try
to
implement
these
vesting
contracts
in
a
mass
amount
so
that
we're
not
doing
all
these
through,
like
clogging
through
proposals
there
so
have
a
look
at
the
proposal
and
definitely
check
out
the
spreadsheet
there.
This
is
not
be
like
the
end-all
be-all
if
it's
like
something
we
can
kind
of.
B
Awesome
and
then
next
up
probably
the
reason
we're
all
here
for
the
discussion
is
the
geek
style,
page
structure,
update
december
2021
draft
proposal
melanie?
Do
you
wanna.
H
Yeah
so
last
week,
I
discussed
briefly
that
chris
keenan
dave
and
I
have
been
revisiting
the
current
dig
style
comp
structure.
Earlier
today.
I
put
up
the
draft
proposal
in
the
forum
of
what
actual
changes
we
would
like
to
see
in
the
compensation
guidelines,
and
there
are
three
primary
areas
that
we
would
like
to
focus
on
in
this
draft
proposal.
H
As
you
know,
the
last
comp
update
did
not
pass
and
it
was
because
we
couldn't
come
to
an
agreement
as
a
collective
as
to
what
was
fair
and
feasible.
So
just
share
your
thoughts
and
any
suggestions
around
this.
So
I
want
to
first
discuss
the
details
of
the
payment
structure,
update
that
would
consist
now
of
eight
levels.
H
Three
more
than
the
current
five.
A
link
to
the
new
eight
levels
is
in
the
proposal
in
the
forum,
and
chris
is
also
sharing
it
now,
but
one
of
the
biggest
reasons
why
we
expanded
the
amount
of
levels
is
so
each
contributor,
current
and
incoming
will
have
a
level
that
you
know
that
they're
contributing
that
really
fits
their
experience
and
skill
set
appropriately.
H
At
one
point,
contributors
were
contributing
at
half
levels,
contributing
at
like
a
3.5.
We
just
wanted
to
eliminate
any
of
that.
Confusion
have
more
detailed
descriptions
and
we
increase
the
amount
of
levels
because
of
that.
In
addition,
we
want
to
ensure
dx
style
is
remaining
competitive
with
market
salaries
and
also
account
for
inflation.
So
you
will
see
an
updated
compensation
amount
here
when
we
previously
updated
our
compensation.
H
We
received
a
lot
of
pushback
in
regards
to
the
amount
of
dxt
that
was
being
allocated
for
contributor
payouts.
Therefore,
we've
decided
it
was
best
to
increase
the
stable
coin
payment
and
only
slightly
increase
the
amount
of
dxd.
I
don't
think
dave
is
on
the
call,
but
he
kind
of
ran
these
numbers,
but
maybe
chris,
if
you
wanted
to
discuss
a
little
bit
more
about
how
we
came
to
calculate
the
numbers
and
just
discuss
the
burn
rate,
a
little
bit
more
yeah
apparently.
B
Yeah,
I
was
gonna,
say
apparently
there's
a
portuguese
holiday.
I
don't
actually
know
which
one
this.
B
B
The
twitter-
that's
like
you
know
you
celebrate
all
the
jewish
holidays,
all
the
random
holidays,
because
then
you
don't
have
to
move
your
car,
but
they
were
also
celebrating
immaculate
conception.
Today,
anyway,
so
yeah
dave
had
run
these
numbers
here.
Let
me
yeah,
and
so
you
can
see
on
the
adjustment
here
you
can
kind
of.
B
I
think
that
this
is
helpful
for,
like
the
percentage
base
dollars
versus
percentage-based
dxd,
I
think
both
on
the
dxc
front
and
also
like,
I
think,
people
at
the
lower
at
some
of
the
levels
like
needing
to
have
the
stablecoin
compensation
be
sufficient.
So
you
can
see
here
it's
like
67
percent
at
the
the
low
end
and
then
like
just
under
50
percent.
At
the
high
end,
there
yeah,
I
think,
as
as
melanie
said
there
really.
The
two
considerations
were
both
these
were
passed.
You.
B
B
There
on
both
like
the
mark
overall
market
and
where,
where
talent
is
kind
of
there
and
then
also
there's,
been
actually
pretty
significant
inflation
over
that
time.
Since
these
were
passed.
B
I
think
that
was
part
of
that
here
and
then
the
numbers
that
are
run
here
are
based
on
the
current
head
count,
I
believe
and
like
what
those
potential
like
future
levels
would
be,
and
then
it's
also
using,
I
think,
that's
750
the
current
750
dollar
price
for
for
dxd,
so
you
could
see
for
just
employees
like
employ
or
sorry
contributors.
B
The
burn
rate
would
be
169
000
dollars
a
month
in
just
the
usd
and
then
the
dxd
one
would
be
150
thousand,
and
that
would
be
two
thousand
just
under
two
thousand
four
dxd
for
the
whole
year
at
this.
So
I'm
not
sure
how
much
do
the
math
on
that's
like
a
little
under
200
txt.
It's
would
be
issued
to
contributors
a
month
there
you
can
see.
Dave
ran
the
number
here.
That's
five
percent
of
the
the
circulating
supply
here.
B
B
H
Yeah
definitely
and
then,
if
you
guys
did
have
any
like
additional
questions,
you
could
write
them
in
the
form
and
then
I
know
dave
will
be
happy
to
explain
them
a
little
bit
further.
H
But
next
I
wanted
to
hop
into
you
know
why
we
want
to
shift
to
a
three
year
vesting
schedule
for
dxd
and
how
paying
dxd
at
market
rate
will
be
calculated
just
moving
to
a
three
year
resting
schedule
overall
helps
align
long-term
incentives
for
dx,
dow
and
our
contributors,
but
the
one-year
cliff
will
still
remain
as
is,
and
then
as
for
how
we
plan
on
calculating
dxd
at
market
price.
H
We
are
shifting
a
little
bit
because,
as
you
know,
dxd
is
usually
calculated
at
all-time
high
based
off
coingecko,
but
we
would
like
to
calculate
the
dxd
price
by
taking
the
average
over
the
last
one
month
in
u.s
dollars,
and
we
will
be
calculating
it
on
swapper.
I
think
that
I'm
chris
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong
coin
gecko
had
made
it
yeah
yeah.
F
Quagmire's
a
mess
it
thinks
our
all-time
high
is
like
a
thousand
when
it
never
reached
that
it
was
like
on
some
low
volume,
centralized
exchange
that
they're,
giving
way
too
much
weight
to
that
probably
is
lying
about
their
volume.
Numbers
on
that
exchange,
so
yeah
on
chain
is
better,
more
reliable.
H
B
It
literally
feels
like
coin
gecko
is
doing
it
on
purpose
because
it's
like
it's
like
they
just
yeah,
it's
surprising,
because
they
normally
under
price
dxd
and
they
just
had
like
a
day
where
it
went
up.
But
yeah.
B
Is,
as
you
said,
it's
better
to
pull
it
on
chain.
I
think
it's
more
less
corrupt
or
harder
to
corrupt,
and
then
also
it's
like
good
to
be
using
swapper
right
and
making
that
the
price
point.
F
Yeah
on
the
dxd
market
rate,
I
think
that's
great
better
than
all-time
high.
I
think,
if
you
know
if
the
price
goes
down
from
an
all-time
high,
that's
damaging
to
the
compensation
structure,
but
are
we
keeping
the
floor
from
the
like
the
bonding
curve
usdi,
which
is
like,
I
think
525?
F
You
know,
I'm
very
hopeful
that
we'd
never
get
back
down
there,
but
just
to
be
comprehensive
here
is
that
floor
is
still
going
to
be
included.
F
F
H
H
But
did
anybody
have
any
other?
Do
we
like
that
suggestion
going
with
the
previous
one
month
average
in
calculating
it
on
swapper?
Do
we
feel,
like
that's
fair.
B
Like
things
going
up
things
going
down-
and
I
know
we
can
like-
I
guess-
no
because
we're
gonna
say
it's
at
the
beginning
of
the
proposal
period,
but
you
could
like
if
it's
over
a
month
it's
just
like
much
harder
to
corrupt
in
a
way,
it's
more
reliable.
F
B
And
the
problem
I
like
this
yeah
yeah,
because
the
problem
was
you
were
I
remember
this
that
set.
I
remember
you
too.
It's
like
you
were
afraid
that
eat
was
going
to
go
down
and
so
you
like
or,
and
so
you
waited
to
submit
your
proposal,
but
each
just
kept
going
up.
That
was
the
that
was
the
takeaway.
B
Yes,
but
that's
and
then
you
know
the
I
won't
speak
for
ross
here,
but
I
think
the
you
know,
the
goal
of
this
structure
is,
of
course,
to
be
completely
automated
through
dick's
vote.
So
like
we're
talking
about
the
specific
parameters
here,
but
the
the
goal
is
that
this
is,
you
know,
work
contributors
aren't
doing
this
themselves
that
this
is
stuff.
We
can
automate
very
easily.
C
Yeah,
I
think
it's
actually
easier
to
automate
this
than
because
coingecko
if
the
recent
all-time
high
has
changed
and
it's
and
we
need
to
go
back
and
find
the
all-time
high
for
a
specific
date.
It's
actually
very
difficult.
So
this
should
be
easier
with
the.
I
guess
we
can
just
use
the
swap
for
sub
graph
to
get
that
data.
B
Yeah
and
the
only
requirement
for
doing
that-
which
I
think
is
fine-
is
that
that
means
that,
whatever
that
on
swapper,
we
need
to
have
a
liquid
gxd,
and
I
guess
we
have
dxd
eth
and
dipole,
so
you
can
get
the
the
price
there.
But
that
does
mean
we'll
need
to
have
that
liquid
in
both
dye
and
dxt.
B
Yeah,
that's
kind
of
the
perhaps
I
think
mainnet
is
probably
the
best.
F
Yeah
there
has
been,
I
have
noticed
some
disc.
There
has
been
some
discrepancy
right
in
recent
days
between,
especially
with
like
the
buyback
going
on
the
next
day,
I
think,
and
the
cost
to
move
to
layer,
one
and
then
yeah
and
the
time
to
get
out
of
arbitram.
You
have
these
weird,
like
frictions
on
arbitrage.
I
would
imagine
in
the
future
some
of
that
kind
of
get
hopefully
gets
addressed,
but.
C
B
Yeah
yeah,
that
would
make
I
mean-
and
I
think
the
xdy1
I
mean
I
don't
know
which
ones
had
the
most
volume
but
excise
above
million
and
a
million
total
tbl,
which
is
like
twice
as
big
as
the
main
net
one.
So
yeah
xda
might
make
sense.
F
H
Yeah,
okay
and
then,
as
far
as
how
will
the
level
changes
kind
of
be
determining
determined,
mainly
it'll,
just
be
up
to
the
individual
contributors
contributors
should
do
like
a
self-evaluation
based
on
the
language
presented
in
the
new
comp
structure.
Maybe
have
a
discussion
with
your
squad
lead
or
any
other
relevant
contributors.
H
I'm
also
happy
to
help
to
help
you
determine
what
level
you
should
be
adjusted
to
it'll,
be
then
up
to
you
to
make
the
decision
and
post
it
in
your
next
contributor
proposal,
if
you're
still
unsure
in
in
the
forum
post,
there's
a
suggested
guide,
it's
up
right
now
to
kind
of
help.
You
determine
your
new
level,
okay
and
then.
Lastly,
I
just
wanted
to
discuss
allocating
half
yearly.
Funding
towards
bonuses.
H
Contributors
have
expressed
interest
in
using
systems
such
as
coordinate
source
cred.
Everyone
was
definitely
fond
of
the
retrospective
shipping
bonuses
that
john
and
gerald
implemented
earlier
this
year.
So
we're
we
wanted
to
begin
to
put
some
structure
around
this
initiative
of
rewarding
contributors
and
pass
a
kind
of
a
dedicated
bi-annual
allocation
amount.
In
this
proposal
we
are
suggesting
allocated
a
hundred
thousand
every
six
months
toward
bonuses
for
dx
stock
contributors
in
a
mix
of
us
dollars
and
dxd.
H
That's
roughly
about
five
percent
of
the
compensation
budget.
We,
you
know,
we
didn't
have
anything
specific
around
what
systems
we
want
to
use,
but
we
just
like.
I
said
we
want
to
dedicate
a
specific
amount
and
then
just
wanted
to
get
kind
of
consensus
on
that
number
and
then
begin
to
put
more
structure
on
what
system
we'd
like
to
use
yeah
any
thoughts
on
that.
B
Right
awesome:
do
you
think
we
should?
I
I
always
like?
I
think
it's
important
to
like
when
you
look
at
the
text,
to
like
signal
certain
things,
even
if
people
read
into
it
so
much
so
like.
I
think
we
should
make
like
add
something
about
carrot
in
there
too.
B
Just
because
that's
like
a
you
know,
kind
of
signals
this
and
that's
what
kind
of
point
of
this
last
one
is
more
of
like
this
is
signaling
intent,
so
that
in
the
future
we
can
come
up
with
like
a
system
that
kind
of
system,
but
we
already
have
like
some
suggestions
already
that
governance
has
kind
of
agreed
to-
and
I
think
that's
like
helpful
for
getting
things
done,
is
to
kind
of
put
things
do
things
now,
which
will
become,
which
will
be
helpful
for
getting
consensus
in
the
future.
I
Yeah,
I
see
carrot
as
like
a
tool
to
look
into
the
future
and
like
try
to
pinpoint
like
bono's
packages
right.
Retroactive
is
also
very
important
because
we
can't
predict
everything
and
we
should
like
set
aside
money
for
like
okay.
We
didn't
expect
this,
but
someone
made
something
and
those
people
should
be
rewarded
retroactive
actively.
So
I
think
there's
there
should
be
a
mix
of
carrot,
style,
future,
looking
rewards
and
then
retroactive
shipping
bonuses.
G
G
I
Just
like
one
one
last
thing
yeah
for
carrots
like
we
can
define
something
and
then
it's
quite
like
it.
Everything
is
clear
about
the
reward
right
do
a
if
a
happens,
get
reward
at
a
specific
date.
That's
very
clear
for
everyone.
I
Retroactive
is
not
clear,
and
there
was
some
critique
about
like
like
centralized,
because
someone
like
a
lead,
a
leadership
role,
went
to
dart
talk
and
like
propose
something.
So
one
thing
we
could
do
is
that
we
similar
to
like
social
rep
booths.
We
said
like
every
six
months.
I
B
Ross
says
just
going
to
say
that
the
wording
here
suggests
the
allocation.
The
implementation
of
the
bonus
is
still
up
to
debate.
I
would
say
that
that
is
up
for
debate
no
yeah.
I
think
the
the
context
for
this
is
we
don't
know
what
exactly
that
bonus
structure
will
look
like,
and
there
was
some
discussion
on
like
using
coordinate
and
then
also
retroacting
we're
talking
about
carrot
here.
So
the
hope
was
to
not
have
a
specific
system
but
try
to
like
move
the
ball
forward
to
that
system
and
so
yeah.
B
I
Yeah
I
like
that,
like
I
think,
if
we
get
an
approval
for
the
amount,
that's
already
like
great
right
and
then
we
can
like
slowly.
A
I
Into
all
those
tools
and
like
check
them
out
play
around
with
them
use
carrot,
I
I
don't
think
we
should
like
try
to
like
settle
on
something
now
like
this
is
a
very
dynamic
process,
but
having
the
specific
amount
already
set
aside
is
good
for
the
contributors,
because
they
know
there's
like
this
money,
which
will
go
to
definitely
go
to
the
contributors.
I
It's
already
like
an
incentivization
process,
and
I
mean
a
very
important
one,
but
then
we
can
like
just
use
actually
like
try
to
use
everything
and
then
see
what
works
and
what
doesn't
work
and
then
yeah.
We
will
improve
the
organization.
H
All
right,
well,
I
mean
I
guess
those
were
like
the
main
things
that
you
know.
We
wanted
to
kind
of
gain
consensus
around
for
this
draft
proposal.
We
didn't
really
want
to
put
too
many
things
in.
I
know
we
discussed
shifting
to
like
a
three-month
cadence
and
we
wanted
to
include
a
lot
of
things
in
like
a
compensation
overhaul,
but
we
kind
of
kept
it
a
little
bit
more
simple
wanted
to
get
this
kind
of
pay
structure
figured
out
and
then
push
forward.
So
please
leave
any
comments
in
the
forum.
H
If
you
have
any
questions
about
dxd
and
burn
rate
and
floor
numbers,
please
leave
a
message
for
dave
and
I'm
sure
he'll
he'll
get
back
to
you,
but
next
I
wanted
to
just
spend
the
next
few
minutes
letting
ali
kind
of
discuss
the
contributor
review
system,
the
feedback
review
system.
There
was
a
post
in
the
forum
about
it,
but
I
invited
ali
to
this
call.
H
So
she
can
also
kind
of
go
a
little
bit
more
in
depth
through
the
proposal
and
what
that's
going
to
look
like
in
the
upcoming
weeks
so
ali.
Whenever
you
kind
of
want
to
take
over
and.
A
Yeah
for
sure
I
will
keep
it
quick
and
simple.
I
have
a
pretty
detailed
dock
that
has
all
the
information
that
you
could
possibly
need
for
the
review
coming
up
next
week
and
I
will
send
that
out
to
everyone
today.
So
just
this
step-by-step
process
I'll
go
over.
A
So
by
the
end
of
the
week
you
will
be
receiving
from
me
a
personal
message
on
key
base,
just
informing
you
of
the
current
dxdot
contributors
that
you
will
be
reviewing
and
if
you
could
just
like
shoot
me,
a
message
back
just
to
confirm
that
you
understand
who
you
will
be
reviewing
and
on
monday,
so
this
upcoming
monday
december
13th
at
6
a.m.
Utc
the
survey
will
be
open
and
accessible
and
it
will
be
open
for
a
week,
so
it
closes
the
next
monday
december
20th
at
6
pm
utc.
So
you
have
that
time.
A
A
So
once
the
survey
closes
on
december,
the
20th
I
will
be
taking
the
week
to
basically
collect
all
of
the
data,
and
then
I
will
be
dispersing
it
back
out
to
all
the
contributors
via
personal
message
on
key
base
again,
so
I
will
be
giving
you
all
the
information
that
you
will
have
received
over
the
survey
from
the
contributor,
so
you'll
know
who
is
giving
you
the
reviews.
Nothing
will
be
anonymous
and,
of
course,
because,
like
the
holiday
season
is
coming
up.
A
I
understand
that
especially
that
what
second
and
last
week
of
december
and
then
maybe
even
the
first
week
of
january,
might
be
a
bit
spotty.
I'm
sure
people
are
taking
time
off,
but
I
will
be
around
and
in
the
beginning
of
january.
A
The
survey
just
feel
free
to
give
it
to
me,
because
this
is
kind
of
like
a
a
trial
run,
so
accepting
any
rides
everyone,
the
the
graph,
has
already
been
sorted
out,
so
everyone
has
already
been
randomly
assigned
to
who
they're
reviewing
and
yeah.
That's
pretty
much
all
the
information
that
I
will
say
in
this
call
and
then
all
the
details
are
in
a
dock
that
I'll
be
sending
out.
So
if
you
missed
anything,
it
should
all
be
in
the
dock.
H
That's
great
looking
forward
to
it
and
the
review
is
it's
short.
It's
really
straightforward.
I
think
that
this
is
just
like
a
great
start
for
us
to
start
giving
each
other
constructive
feedback.
I
know
feedback's
something
one
of
the
top
things
that
contributors
have
been
asking
for
for
a
long
time
and
it
is
challenging
to
do
it
within
like
a
decentralized
organization.
H
So,
like
ali
was
saying,
this
is
kind
of
a
trial
and
it'll,
hopefully
kind
of
evolve
as
the
months
pass,
and
you
know
we
can
see
what
we
like
what
changes
we'd
like
to
make
if
there
are
any,
but
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
it
as
well.
B
Awesome
any
a
lot
of
exciting
things.
I
don't
know
I'm
just
thinking
about
this,
we're
doing
a
new
comp,
update
review
system
and
a
dow,
even
like
the
initial
in
it
dow
there's
like
kind
of
a
lot
of
things
that
that
are
just
like
happening,
we're
kind
of
pushing
forward.
So
I
think
it's
a
exciting
time
as
we
head
into
2022.