►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-09-15]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
d
style
governance,
discussion
september
15,
1500
utc,
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup,
I'm
actually
going
to
share
my
screen
here,
so
we
can
go
over
it
on
dx
vote
here.
So
a
lot
of
proposals
on
kind
of
all
the
bases
here.
I
guess
the
big
one
right
here
at
the
top
is
update
swapper.net
resolver
to
point
to
the
beta
5
release
of
swapper.
So
this
is
set
to
pass
in.
I
believe
three
hours-
and
this
is
the
launch
of-
I
guess
the
big
kahuna.
B
Maybe
I
don't
know
if
john
wants
to
maybe
explain
what
the
what
this
proposal
is
doing
exactly
is
it's
doing
a
lot.
C
Yeah
I
mean
well
this
proposal.
I
mean
there's
a
lot
kind
of
going
on
to
support
this
proposal,
which
is
why
the
the
text
is
a
bit
long
and
there
is
there's
a
lot
to
understand.
But
this
proposal
itself
is
updating
the
content
in
the
hash
for
swapper.edu
swapper
beta
5,
which
will
point
to
the
new
deployments
of
the
swapper
contracts.
The
new
you
know,
which
uses
the
new
swapper
token
and
supports
the
converter,
so
people
who
have
claimed
will
be
able
to
convert
to
the
new
swapper
and
again
how
the
that
works
is.
C
There
is
not
a
new
claimer
everybody
who
has
an
airdrop
to
claim
which
they
are
eligible
to
claim
until
the
end
of
the
year
will
still
be
claiming
from
that
old
contract
and
then
doing
the
conversion
step.
But
that
is
supported
with
the
ui.
C
The
ui
will
be
walking
you
through
those
those
steps,
so
it
should
be
straightforward
for
people
claiming
something
that
might
be
a
little
trickier
but
is
also
prompted
in
the
ui
is
pulling
any
liquidity
from
the
current
version
of
swapper
on
arbitrary
and
then
moving
it
over
to
the
new,
because
it's
a
whole
new
set
of
contracts.
So
any
anything
in
the
old
one
needs
to
be
moved
over.
C
B
C
C
Yeah,
but
he
wants
you,
it's
a
good
habit
to
create
the
issues
on
github
and
not
just
say
the
issues
into
the
void
like
they
need
to
be
tracked
somewhere.
So
yeah
you
can
do
that.
B
And
then
jumping
a
little
ahead
actually,
but
maybe
we
can
go
to
arbor
trump
one
base
and
go
over
some
of
the
proposals
that
were
passed
yesterday,
which
obviously
related
to
the
swapper.eth
release,
and
hopefully
they
will.
I
think
they
should
appear
here
in
just
a
moment.
But
john,
do
you
want
to
explain
those
yeah.
C
So
it
was
a
long
long
afternoon
for
me-
and
I
think
late
night
for
a
lot
of
other
people
working
on
these
proposals
yesterday,
because
there's
nine
farming
campaigns
that
are
now
live
on
the
new
swapper.
C
If
you
go
back
to
those
proposals
that
we
were
looking
at
before
you
can
go
to
that
content
hash,
you
can
actually
see
the
new
beta
5
version
of
swapper
and
and
in
there
you
can
see
that
there
are
nine
pairs
corresponding
to
the
nine
farming
campaigns
in
the
first
epoch,
each
epoch
being
two
weeks
on
so
on,
auburn
and
and
yeah.
It
took
quite
a
bit
of
work
to
get
these
all
through
yesterday,
yeah
there's
nine
different
proposals,
one
each
one
for
each
farming
campaign.
C
So
if
you
had
a
pair,
if
you
want
to
like
go
into
one,
for
example,
and
if
you
click
on
the
magnifying
glass
well,
actually
that
probably
is
not
going
to
help,
but
do
it
anyway.
So
so
there's
two
calls
here
and-
and
this
is
coming
from
the
swapper
wallet
scheme-
you
can
see
that
in
the
upper
right
on
that
side
panel.
C
So
the
the
swapper
wallet
scheme
has
been
loaded
up
with,
I
think
it's
almost
7
million
a
six
to
seven
million
swapper
token,
with
the
intent
of
supporting
the
first
few
months
of
farming
campaigns
like
from
that
pool
and
the
swapper
wallet
scheme
has
been
configured
to
support
relatively
fast
decisions
for
the
early
days
to
help
help
make
sure
that
farming
is
nimble
for
this
initial
set
of
proposals,
though
we're
actually
in
kind
of
what
I
would
describe
as
a
temporary
multi-sig
mode,
where
the
dow
has
all
of
the
right
rep
holders.
C
But
it
has
been
weighted
to
like
a
basically
a
multi-sig
number
of
people.
It's
like
a
three
of
five
and-
and
that
was
done
mostly
just
to
make
sure
that
things
are
stable
and
that
all
of
the
configuration
and
initial
setup
can
be
done
here
in
the
first
few
days.
C
Obviously,
it
takes
a
decent
amount
of
coordination
to
pass
a
proposal
when
you
have
like
large
numbers
of
voters
required
and
stuff,
and
so
just
given
the
pressure
with
the
redeployment
and
the
number
of
moving
pieces
and
it
sort
of
felt
like
a
necessity.
Obviously
we
don't
like
being
in
this
mode
and
the
as
soon
as
things
do
look
like.
Well,
I
think
things
look
very
stable
now.
I
think
there's
maybe
a
couple
more
steps.
C
This
one
is
is
the
approved
call
and
that
approves
eight
89
600
swapper
to
be
sent
to
the
farming
factory,
basically
on
that's
the
first
thing
so
just
to
approve
the
ability
for
the
swapper
wallet
scheme
to
send
the
tokens
and
then
the
second
one
is
a
call
to
the
farming
factory
to
actually
create
the
campaign.
So
you
can
actually
see
the
description
is
clear.
C
Although
it's
it's
kind
of
long
and
full
of
numbers,
that
might
be
a
little
bit
intimidating,
but,
let's
just
read
through
it,
so
create
a
liquidity
mining
campaign
on
pair
and
then
it
lists
the
pair
address.
If
you
go
to
arbiscan.
Actually
our
scam
is
not
that
great
and
see
these
are.
These
are
some
of
the
challenges
that
we
face
right
like
it's.
C
I
don't
think
everything
is
actually
going
to
show
you
that
the
code
and
stuff
for
that
contract,
but
if
you
were
to
go
look
at
the
new
dx
stats
and
find
the
curve
eth
pool,
you
will
see
that
that
pair
address
it
corresponds
to
that
curvy
thing.
Yeah.
C
See
the
tokens
which
is
great-
I
don't
know
if
it
shows
you
the
code,
no
not
yet
so
yeah,
I
don't
know.
Arbor
scan
still
has
some
features
left
to
be
desired
relative
to
ether
scan
but
yeah.
So
then
it's
starting
at
and
this
is
a
unix
time
stamp.
So
if
you
went
into
a
unix,
timestamp
converter,
you
would
see
that
that
time
is
like
unix
seconds
time
representing
tomorrow
september,
16
1500
utc,
which
actually
corresponds
for
our
weekly,
the
the
start
of
the
weekly
call.
C
So
that
will
be
the
start
of
the
farming
campaign
and
then
it
runs
to
for
two
weeks
so
that
second
timestamp
represents
september
30th
at
the
same
time,
and
then
the
reward
token
corresponds
that
address
that
address
there.
The
the
de-9
is
actually
the
new
swapper
token
on
arbor
scan
you
can
on
arbitrary.
I'm
sorry,
you
can
verify
that
on
the
bridge
like
if
you
actually
look
at
the
token
list,
you'll
see
that
address
there,
it
is
whitelisted.
C
You
should
be
able
to
see
the
tokens
in
the
right
places
like
most
of
the
tokens
are
on
mainnet
in
the
dxnow
avatar.
The
rest
of
them
are
in
either
the
swapper
wallet
scheme
on
the
arbitrary
base
or
the
avatar
on
the
arbitrary
base,
and
also
important
to
note
that
the
old
swapper
address
has
been
removed
from
the
whitelist,
so
people
that
that
stuff
is
sort
of
basically
it's
not
going
to
disappear,
but
it's
for
now
just
kind
of
ossified
on
arbitrary
in
the
dx
down
treasury
kind
of
swapper
classic.
C
If
you,
if
you
will,
maybe
maybe
it'll,
become
a
collectible
someday,
I
don't
know,
but
actually
chris,
if
you
go
to
arby's
scan,
I
want
to
show
people
if
you
go
to
the
search
bar
and
type
in
swapper
yeah.
Just
a
pr
you'll
see
that
there's
three
that
come
up,
which
is
you
know,
maybe
not
great
for
now.
I
think
at
some
points
the
the
icon
will
show
we
gotta
there's
a
couple
of
steps
left
that
we
need
to
complete
there,
and
you
know
the
value
will
show
on
that
kind
of
thing.
C
One
of
the
addresses
is
like
a
test
deployment
that,
like
one
of
the
swapper
ones,
that
was
showing
the
results
was
just
like
a
test
deployment
and
then
the
other
one
is
the
one
that
most
people
currently
have
that
people
have
been
claiming
from
the
from
the
airdrop.
So
a
little
bit
of
confusion
there,
but
hopefully
we'll
get
it
clearer
and
yeah.
It's
good
for
folks
here
to
be
aware
to
help
those
who
will
have
questions
about
this,
but
then
yeah.
C
Finally,
there's
the
reward
amounts
the
giant
number,
because
it's
in
way,
so
it's
got
18.
It
represents
all
the
18
decimal
places
that
come
with
the
swapper
token,
so
that
corresponds
to
89
600
swapper,
there's,
actually
a
cool
convenience
site,
that's
called
like
eat
away
converter.
If
you
just
google
eat
away,
you
can
plug
it
in
there
and
see
that
it's
actually
89
600.
C
Yeah
I
mean
it's
good.
I
mean
this
is
what
we
were
doing
yesterday.
Basically,
we
had
like
a
group
of
people,
and
we
were
very
nervous,
obviously
about
making
a
mistake
with
this,
because
if
we
accidentally
passed
a
proposal
that
sent
too
much
swapper
or
to
the
wrong
pair,
like
I
don't
there's
not
an
easy
way
to
like,
I
don't
think
it's
actually
undoable.
So
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
sensitive
operation
like
a
lot
of
the
stuff
that
we're
actually
doing
and
have
been
doing
the
last
couple
weeks.
C
But
then,
finally,
here
cap
put
at
zero
and
lock
status
false.
These
are
the
when
you
are
filling
out
a
new
proposal
to
make
a
liquidity
mining
campaign.
C
There's
a
field
for
the
staking
cap
and
if
you
put
a
number
in
there,
it
becomes
that,
if
you
put,
if
you
want
to
be
unlimited,
though
you
just
put
in
zero,
so
all
of
these
farming
campaigns
are
unlimited
farming
campaigns,
meaning
any
amount
of
stake
can
be
put
in
there
and
then
the
last
thing,
the
locked
status
being
false
means
that
it's
an
unlocked
campaign.
If
you
put
your
stake,
your
lp
tokens
you
can
take
them
out.
C
Feature
depending
on
what
you're
trying
to
do,
but
yeah,
that's
that's!
Basically
it
you
see
the
call
data
there.
The
parameter
is
all
kind
of
in
one
chunk:
that's
what's
being
passed
around
unchained
and
used
to
set
up
the
actual
farming
campaign
in
the
smart
contracts,
but
yeah.
Those
like
you
know
each
one
of
those
comma
separated
fields
inside
of
that
params
array
correspond
to
what
we
just
went
through
right.
So
the
address
is
the
amounts
yeah.
C
Another
thing
you
can
see
is
that
these
are
all
passed
by
absolute
majority
right.
They
all
have
over
50.
You
can
also
see
one
that
I
made
a
mistake
on
the
53
percent,
the
one
that's
down
voted,
I
accidentally
put
the
wrong
pair,
and
luckily
we
because
we
were
being
pretty
good
about
reviewing
we
caught,
I
actually
caught
it
myself
and
other
people
caught
it
before
we
even
voted
on
it.
So
it's
it
was
on
the
wrong
pair.
It
was
not
the
maker.
C
C
Another
thing
we
had
to
be
really
careful
with
on
the
absolute
majority
stuff
is
when
you
vote
on
a
pre-boosted
proposal,
as
some
of
you
know,
there's
like
a
reputation
lock
and
I
think
it's
set
to
something
like
five
percent
for
the
swapper
wallet
scheme.
So
even
though
we
had
the
ability
with
three
people
to
get
past
the
50
mark,
we
had.
C
Careful
because
every
time
we
did
a
vote,
you
know
five
percent
of
that
would
be
locked
up,
and
so
you
can
see
if
it's
at
53.7
actually
like
two
and
a
half
percent
is
getting
locked
up
when
those
votes
go
in.
So
if
we
weren't
really
careful
to
redeem
the
rep
before
making
the
proposals,
we
could
have
gone
into
a
situation
where
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
actually
pass
the
absolute
majority
proposals
with
the
three
people
and
like
why
was
it
three
or
five
and
not
like
a
bigger
number?
C
And
this
was
like
a
practicality
thing
like
we
probably
would
have
liked
to
have
it
be
a
little
bit
bigger
multisig
effectively.
But
if
you're
simulating
a
multisig
with
rep,
you
don't
have
the
same
flexibility
right.
You
actually
have
to
get
to
a
certain
amount
of
rep,
and
if
you
want
like
a
certain
number
of
people
to
be
able
to
pass
something,
they
have
to
be
above
50.
C
And
so,
if
you
wanted
to
have
three
people
be
able
to
execute
something,
then
you
got
to
find
a
number
that
gets
you
over
50
and
you
can
only
have
five
people
with
that
number,
basically
to
be
under
a
hundred
percent
and
augusto
wants
to
talk.
E
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
make
clear
that
the
reputation
that
you
can
use
to
vote
on
a
proposal
is
the
one
that
you
have
when
the
proposal
was
created
and
what
is
happening
here
is
that,
for
example,
the
swap
reward
scheme
you
have
five
reported
five
percent
voter
reputations
ratio
and
that
both
the
reputation
loss
ratio
was
used
on
all
these
proposals,
because
none
of
none
of
those
proposals
got
into
boosted
state
and
that's
when
your
reputation
gets
locked
and
actually
it
is
not
that
it
gets
locked.
E
E
No,
there
is
no
issue
because
I'm
going
to
be
able
to
claim
it
later,
but
if,
before
I
claim
that
reputation
that
was
burned,
another
proposal
is
created
on
that
proposal.
I
will
be
able
to
go
with
five
percent
less
of
reputation
that
I
had
before
right,
because
it's
taking
the
reputation
that
I
have
at
the
moment
the
proposed
equation.
E
So
if,
if
you
do
that
you,
if
you,
if
you
are
not
careful
about
redeeming
the
reputation,
then
creating
a
proposal,
it
happened.
What
john
said
you
can
get
into
a
loop
where
you
get
a
lot
of
reputation
burn
and
later
you
have
to
claim
it
all
at
once,
and
it
was
going
to
be
harder
to
pass
a
maturity
vote.
So
that's
very
important.
The
the
reputation
that
you
use
you
can
use
to
vote
is
the
the
reputation
amount
that
you
have
on
the
moment
when
the
proposal
was
created.
C
And
yeah,
I
think
the
redeem
button
is
now
actually
working.
I
was
using
it
yesterday
for
for
getting
your
rep
back
and
yeah.
You
can
see
this
effects
with
the
curve
weth
proposal
at
the
bottom
of
the
screen
here
see
how
it's
51
it's
the
same
address
as
voting
as
in
the
other
ones
with
53.
But
what
had
happened
is
that
proposal
had
been
made
before
people
had
claimed
their
rep
on
a
previous
one
and
so
yeah.
C
C
C
One
is
we
should
pass
a
boosted
or
a
few
boosted
proposals
to
make
sure
that
that
mode
of
operation
is
configured
properly
and
working,
and
I
think
that
would
kind
of
give
the
confidence
to
say
like
we
can
unwind
the
extra
rep
and
then
the
actual
proposals
to
unwind
the
rep
themselves
are
also
sensitive
operations
right,
because,
if
you
mit
too
much
or
burn
too
much,
it
could
could
potentially
be
bad,
but
I
think
we
could
do
those
one
at
a
time
and
I
think
the
main
thing
would
be
to
have
the
the
proven
boosted
proposals
working
first,
a
nice
to
have
would
be
like
tenderly,
supporting
arbitrary
tenderly
we
use
for
simulating
proposals.
C
It's
actually
really
really
important,
really
helpful
to
be
able
to
see
what
the
proposal
is
going
to
do.
If
it
actually
is
going
to
succeed.
The
way
you
want
it
to
to
see
the
events
that
will
be
emitted,
we
use
it
regularly
on
on
mainnet.
I
definitely
encourage
people
to
use
it.
We
actually
have
like
a
dx
style
subscription.
So
anytime,
you
have
a
proposal
and
you
want
to
confirm
that
the
proposal
does
what
you
think
it
did.
You
go
into
tenderly
and
you
run
a
simulation.
C
It's
actually
not
too
hard
to
do
it's
a
a
little
bit
technically
you
gotta
get
set
up
with
an
account
but
like
where
I
think
we
should
get
as
many
people
doing
that
as
possible,
because
it's
oh,
she
did
the
subscription.
Oh,
no,
okay,
we
well.
I
think
they
just
invoiced
us
on
that.
So
we'll
have
to
make
sure
that
that
gets
covered.
C
I
probably
just
need
to
ping
nico,
yeah
and
yeah,
just
ping
nico,
because
he
has
the
invoice
and
I
think
it's
it'll
be
down
to
that,
and
there
are
plans
I
think
augusto.
Doesn't
the
attack
plan
for
dx
vote
include
some
simulation
integration.
E
Yes,
yes,
this
is
one
of
the
features
that
we
need
to
have
in
the
ui,
so
yeah
definitely-
and
this
is
something
that
we're
going
to
start
testing
on
on
ring
kv
and
mainnet
and
nxi
so
later.
I
think
we
have
no
issue
for
it,
but
we
should
create
an
issue
later
with
ros
and
make
sure
that
we
have
everything
there
too.
C
Yeah
there's
some
cool.
I
don't
know
if
people
probably
are
already
familiar
with
the
expo,
but
I
think
it
might
be
worthwhile
to
go
up
into
the
settings
and
to
see
like
where
you
can
find
the
schemes
and
the
permissions
and
also
the
addresses
that
are.
I
think
it's
that
little
chart
thingy
that
the
bart
icon
and
then
schemes
is
where
you
can
see
the
the
different
schemes.
So
you
have
to
register
wallet
scheme
and
a
key
thing
here
to
understand
the
power
of
the
scheme.
C
E
Yeah
positive
yeah,
for
example,
the
register
wallet
scheme.
It
can
do
anything
on
the
on
on
the
controller.
The
master
wallet
scheme
can
only
execute
generic
calls,
which
is
basically
making
calls
from
the
avatar
contract,
which,
on
main,
for
example,
is
the
contract
that
holds
our
our
funds.
And
then
you
have
the
quick
wallet
and
swap
reward
scheme
that
they
are
not
going
to
make
any
call
to
the
controller,
but
they
can
make
calls
from
from
themselves
and
use
the
reputation
and
the
voting
machine.
The
same
way
that
we
use
in
the
master
wallet.
E
E
How
much
it
is
the
reputation
it
is
allowed
to
change
in
a
proposal
in
the
scheme
if
it
can
mean
how
much
both
the
reputation
loss
ratio,
the
minimum
dial
bounty
everything
and,
on
the
other,
you
have
a
permissions
view
where
we
have
all
the
permissions
listed,
that
every
scheme
can
execute
that
was
studied
last
week,
so
this
might
be
kind
of
hard
to
understand,
but
basically
this
is
all
the
permission
that
any
that
the
schemes
can
do.
E
So
these
are
all
the
the
transfers
that
are
from
asset
from
to
the
function
they
can
execute
at
any
value.
The
initial
configuration
that
we
use
in
arbitron
was
a
very
flexible
one,
so
we
are
allowing
everything
to
happen
and
one
of
the
steps
after
or
maybe
before
start
removing
the
reputation.
The
extra
repetition
that
we
use
is
to
curate
a
bit
more.
These.
This
permission,
so
we
make
sure,
for
example,
that
the
swapper
wallet
scheme
can
only
make
costs
to
the
swapper
protocol
addresses
and
the
avatar.
C
I
almost
feel
like
we
should
talk
a
little
bit
about
what
the
different
contracts
are,
because
I
think,
even
if
you're
familiar
with
stuff,
it
gets
a
little.
Maybe
not
everybody
understands
like.
I
think
it's
taken
me
a
while
to
even
get
a
good
grasp
of
it.
So
like
just
briefly
try
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
it.
The
avatar
is,
is
the
address
that
is
like
kind
of
like
the
identity
of
the
dow.
C
That's
where
the
treasury
is
stored,
that's
like
where
ownership
of
ens
addresses
are
assigned,
it's
sort
of
like
the
identity,
the
address
to
own
things
and
where
all
the
main,
like
calls
come
out
of
like
if
you
actually
want
to
send
funds
from
the
treasury,
or
you
know,
do
important
things
like
update
the
ens
content
hashtag
that
is
coming
from
the
avatar.
C
That's
why
these
permissions,
like
calls
from
the
avatar,
have
to
be
enabled
right
so
but,
like
the
controller,
is
sort
of
what
it
says
it
is
right.
It
acts
it's
sort
of
managing
the
way
the
system
works
like
where
things
can
be
done,
and
everything
goes
through.
The
controller
before
getting
to
the
avatar
and
all
these
schemes
are:
how
would
you
describe
it
again,
they're,
like
voting
mechanisms
they're
each
their
own
smart
contract?
C
That
has
a
certain
configuration
that
you
know
allows
like
control
like
control
of
the
controller
controls,
but
like
specifies
how
voting
works
under
that
scheme,
and
so
you
can
set
up
different
schemes
to
support
like
different
things
that
you
want
to
do,
making
some
things,
maybe
a
little
bit
more
difficult
or
limiting
access
to
certain
things
and
yeah,
maybe
not
doing
the
best
job,
but
that
trying
to
explain
why
the
why
we
have
all
these
different
things.
C
The
register
wallet
scheme
is
there
to
allow
people
to
actually
put
in
new
schemes
and
control
the
parameters
of
the
different
schemes,
the
quick
wallet
scheme.
This
one
doesn't
have
controller
permissions,
so
it
can
only
send
funds
from
itself
and
not
from
the
avatar.
So
it's
meant
to
serve
this
purpose
of
well.
If
you
want
to
do
something
quickly,
with
a
smaller
amount
of
funds,
you
can
actually
load
the
quick
wallet
scheme
up
with
a
limited
amount
of
funds
and
then
do
things
with
less
restrictive
parameters.
C
Swapper
wallet
scheme
is
in
the
same
vein
as
the
quick
wallet
scheme,
but
it's
intended
to
really
just
run
stuff
for
a
swapper,
so
it
is
a
bit
sensitive
in
the
sense
that
it
has
a
good
amount
of
swapper
token
in
it
right
now,
but
that's
like
its
sole
purpose
right
so
and
as
soon
as
we
get
through
this
sort
of
intense
early
phase
here,
we're
gonna
try
to,
I
think,
make
these
parameters
more
restrictive
and
you
know
feel
good
about
those
in
the
same
way.
C
So
so
one
thing
to
notice
for
the
swapper
wallet
scheme
is
the
pre-boosted
period,
is
12
hours
and
the
boosted
period
is
one
day.
So
that
means
you
can
actually
pass
proposals
from
the
swapper
wallet
scheme
in
one
and
a
half
days.
That's
actually
like
kind
of
scary
short
right,
like
it's
less
than
a
weekend
right.
So
what
actually
guards
against
that
and
that's
the
required
percentage
for
boosted
approval.
So
the
only
way
you
can
pass
a
proposal,
one
half
days,
though,
is
you
still
have
to.
D
C
At
least
10
of
the
reputation
to
vote
so
that
provides
some
safeguard
against
you
know
a
rogue
attack
by
trying
to
sneak
a
proposal
through
on
the
swapper
wallet
scheme
you'd
still
have
to
get
a
few.
C
You
know
at
least
a
few
rep
holders,
with
significant
percentages
or
like
a
larger
number,
with
smaller
percentages
to
get
to
that
10
threshold.
The
master
wallet
scheme
is
another
important
one.
That
also
has
the
controller
permissions,
so
it's
basically
doing
everything,
except
for
registering
schemes,
which
is
the
register
wallet
scheme
or
whatever
it's
called
register
scheme
and
then
yeah.
C
So
if
you
want
a
mint
new
rep,
if
you
want
to
send
funds
from
the
avatar,
this
is,
this
is
sort
of
probably
what
would
stand
in
for
the
contribution
and
funding
plug-in
scheme
that
we
use
on
mainnet
test,
while
scheme
is
what
it
says
as
well:
we're
not
really
intending
to
use
it
for
anything
other
than
changing
configurations
and
proving
that
things
can
be
done
on
the
the
schemes.
C
E
Now
very
important
thing
is
that
we
are
using
dxe
for
staking
that's
the
first
case,
the
first
time
on
production
that
we
are
using
dxe
for
something
governance
created.
We
haven't
boosted
any
proposal
yet,
but
it's
coming,
we
are
using
a
dxd
boring
machine.
That
is
the
first
version,
so
I
think
that's
very
that's
very
exciting,
and
it's
going
to
be
even
more
when
we
started
when
we
started
seeing
dlc
being
used
in
arabic
room
to
put
proposal
right.
C
And
I
think
that's
a
question
we
should
be
evaluating
is:
did
we
get
the
the
staking
amounts
correct
right?
Is
it
the
right
amount
for
the,
because
the
the
dow
itself
is
actually
spending
a
little
bit
on
the
automatic
down
stake?
So
even
like
with
these
swapper
wallet
scheme
proposals,
like
augusto
said,
these
are
not.
They
were
getting
passed
with
absolute
majority,
so
staking
was
not
required,
but
if
they
were
to
have
been
boosted,
the
the
dow
itself
would
owe
that
0.2
dxd
on
each
one
of
those
proposals.
C
That's
about
100
and
something
dollars
of
of
txt.
It's
meant
to
be
like
sort
of
a
guard
against,
like
any
proposals,
easily
being
voted
and
also
an
incentive
for
people
to
participate
in
the
staking
game
itself
right.
So
it's
basically
a
bounty.
B
C
Yeah
a
little
known
but
kind
of
interesting
feature
of
the
smart
contracts
for
the
governance
here
that
the
dow
actually
can
carry
debt,
basically
by
proposals
that
are
passed
that
you
know
are
supposed
to
send
a
certain
amount
of
tokens
to
some
somewhere
when
those
the
dow
doesn't
actually
hold
those
tokens
like
the
it
doesn't
mean
that
it
won't
be
redeemable
in
the
future.
However,
there
is
a
limit
to
that.
E
No,
no,
no,
no,
no,
no
they're
incapable
at
any
time.
This
is
something
that
we
can
change
in
the
next
versions
of
the
voting
machine,
because,
right
now
it
was
designed
in
a
way
where,
if
you
have
balance
you
have
to,
if
the
avatar
has
balance
of
the
dxe
token,
you
can
redeem
it
at
any
time
right-
and
I
mean
at
any
time
if
you
boost
in
a
proportion
or
that
success
does
succeed
on
what
you
staking.
E
C
E
C
E
That's
a
redeeming
the
contribution
reward
which
which
works
differently
as
a
warrant
scheme
and
yeah.
I
don't
know
the
technical
all
that
technicalities
of
the
contribution
required.
That
is
not
going
to
be
the
case
in
the
wallet
scheme
in
the
wallet
scheme
you
have
calls
and
you
have
a
week
to
execute
it
a
week
I
mean
the
the
max
second
for
execution
for
the
for
the
proposal
to
be
executed,
and
then
you
have
the
regimes
which
is
the
redeems
of
take
tokens,
their
reputation
and
that's
it.
C
E
Yeah
we
could
change
it.
We
should
be
able
to
set,
for
example,
the
master
quality
scheme.
Okay,
we
want
to
set
the
minimum
double
bounty
for
one
dfc,
but
they
we
don't
want
to
refund
the
one
dxe
right
off
minimum
diamond.
We
want
to
give
half
of
it.
If
not,
it
would
be
very
expensive
to
have
the
kind
of
these,
like
this
simulating
downside,
right
with
no
real
dxe
being
being
sticky
by
the
l
right
now.
Everything
that
you
use
as
minimum
antique
has
to
be
repaid
can
be
repaid
when
you
balance.
B
Cool
yeah,
so
jake's
vote
lots
of
lots
of
fun
stuff
in
arbitrary
there
just
to
because
we
have
a
couple
of
things.
I
want
to
just
keep
moving
here
quickly
on
the
main
net,
just
a
couple
other
proposals,
the
hats
proposal
I
feel
like
we've
talked
talked
about
last
week.
Here,
that's
going
to
finish
in
a
couple
hours
and
then
there
are
two
there's:
a
fun
gas
governance
refund
smart
contract
proposal,
which
is
another
round
of
governance
refunds.
B
F
You
know,
as
you
said
so,
the
gas
governance
refunds
are
for
q2,
so
there'll
be
a
new
one
coming
up
soon
as
well.
This
one
was
a
bit
delayed
so
end
of
the
month,
we'll
do
q3
as
well
and
just
on
the
yeah
best
treasury
diversification
proposal
was
submitted
on
monday
and
that
one
actually
also
includes
five
extra
eth,
which
is
for
refunds
for
the
multi-sig
signers.
So
of
course,
they're
also
in
co
incur
fees
when
they
do
trades
or
relay
fund
from
the
relayer.
F
So
there's
also
five
ether
there
just
to
refund
the
multi-sig
signers
yeah.
B
Cool
and
then
just
switching
to
xdi
quickly
here
so
there
is
a
deposit
weapon
x,
die
and
swapper
liquidity,
relayer
and
then
the
provision
liquidity
on
west
xi,
wx
diet
pair.
So
this
is
the
the
two
corresponding
proposals
to
add
liquidity
on
swapper
dave
submitted.
This
we've
been
working
on
this.
This
was
for
a
mainnet
proposal
before
there,
and
so
it
should
be.
We've
done
this
a
couple
times.
It
should
be
fine.
This
is
actually
when
I
ran
into
the
tenderly
issue.
B
I
was
looking
at
that,
but
anyone
it's
set
to
pass.
I
think
in
a
day,
so
have
a
look
at
that
to
see.
If
there's
any
questions
on
that,
and
then
there
is
fluid,
drops
worker
proposal
and
then
also
lucy
foss
federico's
worker
proposal,
which
also
includes
the
additional
payment
for
the
retroactive
shipping
and
then
to
give
a
little
bit
of
highlight
on
deak's
vote,
there's
caney
forks
worker
proposal,
which
was
just
submitted
through
dx
vote,
including
claiming
issuing
usdc
and
minting
rep.
So
I
think
going
forward.
B
I'm
gonna
hopefully
be
doing
all
of
the
proposals
through
dx
vote
and
I
think
everyone
else
can
follow
suit.
There
geek's
vote
is
kind
of
perfectly
capable
that
augusto
fixed
one
last
little
thing
on
the
mint
reputation
there.
So,
but
this
is
a
big
step
forward
for
duke's
vote
in
terms
of
taking
control
of
our
actual
or
governance.
B
As
the
exciting
thing,
or
I
wonder
how
this
got
there,
if
you
look
at
this
proposal
on
alchemy,
there
is
an
automatic
tag
that
was
added
to
it
right
here.
I'm
guessing
that's
from
a
gusto.
B
Appears
perfectly
in
alchemy,
too.
This
is
kind
of
exciting
for
both
of
those
you
can
see.
You
know
this
was
two
months
payment
for
uscc
and
then
rep.
There
too
yeah.
C
Because
because
you
got
to
remember
like
the,
the
smart
contract
system
is
one
in
the
same,
so
it
would
be
a
bad
thing
if,
if
one
of
the
proposals,
if
the
proposal
is
not
showing
up
on
right,
both
interfaces
right
or
if
that
some
of
the
key
information
is
not
displayed
correctly
on
on
both
interfaces
right
yeah,
just
because
you're
using
one
doesn't
mean
it
shouldn't
show
up
at
the
other,
because
at
the
end
of
the
day,
they're
both
interacting
with
the
same
underlying
system.
Although.
B
Most
of
the
problems
typically
result
in
the
subgraph,
like
the
one
syncing,
with
the
alchemy
syncing
with
the
subgraph,
because,
like
there's
actually
some
of
these
on
here
that
this
one,
for
instance,
did
not
pick
up
the
content,
but
it
did
pick
up
the
actual,
like
interactions
with
the
smart
contract,
but
I
think,
and
another
one
did
yeah
this
one
did
pick
that
up
so
there's,
sometimes
some
differences
on
the
ability
to
display
content.
A
One
thing
to
keep
in
mind
chris
on
your
boosted
proposal
there,
if
you
just
show
it
again
like
alchemy,
does
make
it
quite
clear
that
you
can
just
like
go
through
these
proposals.
Then
you
see,
there's
usdc
and
there's
rep
being
sent
to
an
address
and
you're
familiar
with
all
three
of
those
things
in
one
simple
line.
When
you
look
in
the
ex
vote,
that
information
is
there,
but
it's
a
lot
harder
to
figure
out
like
it's
not
impossible
to
figure
out,
but
compared
they
compare
that
to
that.
G
B
Says
submit
an
issue
and,
as
I
think
I
submitted
a
similar
issue,
it
was
like
you
know,
an
alchemy
how
it
gives
you
like
confirmation
before
you
vote
for
something,
and
it
shows
you
what
the
vote
would
be
after,
like
that's
just
a,
I
think,
that's
a
helpful
little
thing
and
you
know
maybe
introducing
something
like
that,
and
I
greece
guy
here
like
yeah.
What's
the
exact
display
or
sending
how
much
usdc
so
I
can,
we
can
make
an
issue
out
of
this.
B
E
Yeah
that
one,
I
think
is
a
is
a
controller.
What
what
you
are
seeing
there,
the
external
token
transfer
function,
that
is
being
called
the
controller.
So
that's
something
that
we
should
decode
a
very
important
thing.
Well,
something
that
is
happening
now.
Is
that
sometimes,
when
you
do
something
on
the
explode,
for
example,
for
me
a
proposal,
it
won't
show
up
in
alchemy
or
it
was
or
it
would
take
some
time
right
because
of
the
orthograph
of
all
the
index.
E
So
it's
a
matter
of
luck,
if
you,
if
alchemy
picks
your
purpose
or
not,
but
anything
that
you
do
on
alchemy
is
going
to
be
picked
up
on
the
on
the
export,
because
we
are
listening
directly
to
the
blockchain
right.
So
this
is
what
we
are
going
to
be
complaining
on.
What
will
happen
on
change
where
on
alchemy,
sometimes
is
taking
some
time,
because
what
it
depends
on
the
graph
and
it's
not
it's,
not
it's
not
a
good
thing
on
the
security
side,
because
you
can
see
a
proposal
that
has
no
data.
E
That
has
nothing,
and
we
saw
it
with
even
like
some
voting
that
some
people
were
working
on
on
a
proposal
I
think
was
on
mine
and
it
wasn't
showing
the
the
votes
on
argument.
So
that's
very
that's
very
important.
In
the
security
side.
A
I
also
thought
the
multi-call
that
there
was
a
proposal
to
send
it
was
a
member
balancer
chris,
I
don't
know
if
the
one
that
went
like
dxd
and
with
to
me,
I
thought,
if
you
went
in
there
yeah
like
see
the
call
zero
and
the
call
one,
it's
very
clear-
the
amount
that
it's
sending.
Why
is
yours
not
showing
that.
A
Like
that's,
that's
very
oh,
you
can
still
see
in
the
description.
The
description
is
very
clear.
The
top
line
versus
your
yours
didn't
say
that
right.
E
Well,
it
depends
because
that's
it
that's
it
that's
a
proposal
on
the
contribute
and
another
one
is
on
the
on
the
on
a
vertical.
So
the
a
contribution
reward
is
super
messy.
Actually,
it's
very
limited
and
I
can't
wait
to
get
rid
of
of
the
of
the
scheme.
It
limits
a
lot
of
stuff
that
you
can
do
and
it's
yeah.
It
was
it's
way
harder
to
decode
what
is
happening
on
the
on
the
contribution
required,
which
is
actually
here
not
too
cold.
B
Moving
on
to
the
discussion
items,
I
know
we're
kind
of
a
little
behind
here,
so
I
just
wanted
to
first
on
the
signal
discussion
for
deep
style
to
participate
in
each
online
sky.
Just
because
I
know
this
is
a
pressing
one,
wasn't
sure
if
there
was
any
additional
context
to
this
or
you
need
to
move
quickly
on
this.
A
So
the
general
gist
is
the
details.
Are
there
it
seems
like
a
pretty
good
thing
to
go
forward
with
cartex,
actually
here
in
denver.
He
connected
me
with
someone
that
could,
I
think,
action
it
rather
sooner.
I
don't
think
like
the
actual
payment
needs
to
be
like
before
the
17th,
but
the
the
go
ahead
to
say
we
want
to
participate
in
this.
A
Here's
our
logo
get
it
ready,
include
us
in
the
launch
of
it
and
everything
and
then
start
like
participating
the
first
week
of
activities
and
things
where
you
you
get
in
their
discord
and
you
you
there's
a
few
different
details
of
like
what's
included.
We
would
want
to
give
that
go
ahead
like
ideally
today
or
tomorrow.
Now
the
pain,
I
don't
think
we
need
to
do
a
whole
on-chain
proposal
for
this.
A
I
think
we
could
have
general
consensus
and
we
already
have
a
marketing
budget
that
is
allocated
for
specifically
for
events
and
hackathons
like
this,
and
so
we
can
figure
out
the
payment.
There's
this
issue
of
like
not
sharing
too
much
of
the
exact
details
in
a
public
forum,
and
so
that
is
more
of
a
more
like
a
off
off
public
forum
conversation.
A
So
if
anyone
had
any
questions
about
that,
but
it's
a
it
is
a
great
opportunity
to
at
least
trial
and
get
involved,
and
you
know,
participate
with
all
the
big
names
that
that
that
participate
in
each
global
and
the
number
one
thing
it
would
hopefully
do
is
get
developers
who
are
looking.
A
I
mean
the
ether
online
has
been
getting
between
like
500
and
700
developers
and
some
are
students.
Some
are
people
in
the
space.
Some
are
people
who
actually
have
projects
but
getting
them
aware
of
it
opportunity
to
build
something
for
the
dx
style
ecosystem
and
then
just
even
looking
into
the
ecosystems
learning
about
our
products.
A
We
can
share
like
what
are
the
products
and
they
can
decide
what
they
think
they
would
be
able
to
build
like
to
add
value
to
the
ecosystem.
So
it
should
be
a
general
like
a
pretty
general
bounty
and
then
it
would
hopefully
bring
conversation
between
those
that
population
of
hackers
and
developers
and
the
excel
community,
and
it
could
be
as
easy
as
set
up
a
discord
channel.
A
You
know
in
our
own
discord
like
anyone
interested
you
see
us
in
ethonline,
come
join
this
channel
and
that's
where,
like
ideas
are
being
shot
around
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff
they
will
have
global
has
their
own
discord.
So
we
want
to
have
a
handful
of
people
participating
in
their
discord
as
well,
but
that
would
be
the
summary
and
that
yeah
the
cost
of
the
basically
the
package
would
be.
A
There
would
be
a
payment
from
dxdow,
probably
from
the
multisig
in
the
next
week
or
so
of
10.
000
is
the
is
the
package,
and
then
then
you
give
you
you
commit
to
a
prize
of
it's
4
000,
I
think,
or
5
000,
to
be
like
the
award
for
the
best
or
whatever
you
want
the
bounty
prize
to
be
or
yeah.
I
think
you
just
give
one.
I
think
it's
just
one
prize,
I
don't
know
if
it's
more
than
one
prize,
but
that's
the
rough
cost
to
participate.
B
Cool
and
I
think,
there's
there's
a
forum
thread
with
more
information.
You
kind
of
click
in
and
we've
been
talking
with
them
for
a
bit
and
there's
been
a
lot
of
good
events
that
each
global
has
done
and
so
yeah,
I
guess,
check
with
sky
any
questions
or
comments
or
objections.
B
Awesome
and
then
moving
along
to
the
next
topic,
I'm
going
to
skip
over
coordinate
for
geek
style
contributors,
because
venky
is
not
here
but
wanted
to
talk
about
the
extended
dxd
buyback
program
for
another
1
million
draft
proposal.
So
I
think,
as
most
people
might
be
aware,
we
are
quickly
approaching
the
two
million
dollar
limit
set
by
the
second
buyback
extension
proposal
for
the
amount
of
dxt
purchase.
This
is
5230
dxd.
B
Let
me
just
share
my
screen
here,
yeah,
and
so
this
was
we've
had
5230
dxd,
that's
an
average
price
of
0.144
each
txt.
B
This
is
percent
of
the
dxd
circulating
supplies
and
the
dc
circuit,
but
supply
was
like
49
000
or
something
like
that,
so
we're
just
over
10
percent
there.
The
proposal
would
extend
the
buyback
program
for
another
million
dollars
to
three
million
dollars
total.
It
would
keep
most
of
the
all
of
the
same
parameters
that
were
established
before
so.
The
25
daily
volume
limit
the
flexibility
to
go
up
to
five
percent
on
the
slippage,
tolerance
and
then
also
the
accounting
for
how
the
dxd
purchases
are
calculated.
B
I
will
say
that
just
in
kind
of
writing
this
text,
I
think
I'm
hoping
that
this
text
kind
of
builds
momentum
towards
the
or
kind
of
signals,
deekstyle's
intention
in
terms
of
the
buyback
program
at
large.
So
there's
some.
B
I
think
the
text
in
here
basically
says
that
there
has
been
756
eth
that
has
been
used
to
purchase
the
5230
and
tying
it
to
the
buyback
reserve,
which
is
you
know
what
is
due
to
dxd
holders,
and
so
I
think
that
kind
of
ties
it
in
there
and
maybe
signals
further
that
that
that
will
be
there.
It
does
not
include
just
some
kind
of
discussion
points.
As
I
said,
it
does
not
change
the
25
percent
on
average
daily
trading
volume.
There's
a
discussion
on
this.
B
We
have
compiled
some
additional
on-chain
data,
but
the
average
daily
trading
volume
really
stayed
the
same
really
the
last
couple
months.
I
think
changing
the
25.
B
We
could
talk
about
it,
but
I
think
the
bigger
thing
is
trying
to
work
on
the
volume,
and
I
think
that
this
process
has
actually
been
relatively
quick
in
terms
of
executing
on
this.
So
I
don't
know
if
it's
really
increasing
the
buy
side.
The
daily
bias
has
really
changed.
Things
on
that
is,
as
I
said,
it
could
extend
it
for
another
million
dollars.
B
We
could
do
two
million
dollars
considering
what
this
had
done
before,
but
I
think
keeping
it
the
one
million
dollars
kind
of
forces
us
to
have
this
conversation,
governance,
discussion,
conversation
there
and
yeah
so
just
wanted
to
kind
of
check
in
with
people
I'm
hoping
to
wanting
to
get
this
to
an
unchained
proposal
on
main
data.
Next,
relatively
soon
considering
we
are
going
up
against
the
two
million
purchases
now,
so
we
want
to
continue
doing
them.
B
A
Is
there
any
thought
about,
as
as
swapper
farming
launches
and
focus
on,
like
some
dxd
pools
on
the
three
different
chains
and
driving,
I
guess
driving
value
to
different
places
and
maybe
arbitrary
doesn't
become
the
main
place
where
dxd
traded,
but
maybe
it
is?
Is
there
like
be
ready
for
adjustments?
I
mean
I
don't
know.
If
we
can
do
this
on
is
the
only
chain
we
can
do.
This
on
right
now
is
x,
die
right,
yeah.
B
A
Because
they're
limit
orders,
I
guess
the
risk
doesn't
really
matter
as
much.
So,
even
if
you
had
90
percent
of
dxd
in
a
pool
on
swapper
on
arbitrarum,
the
fact
that,
as
long
as
there's
people
that
are
arbitraging
between
the
three
chains
or
whatever
it's
okay
to
leave,
your
limit
orders
on
x,
die
and
and
and
effectively
get
it
done.
This
is.
B
I
think
there
is
some
concern
and
discussion
about
splitting
liquidity
into
these
different
pools
that
we
should
have,
because
I
think
it
does.
It
does
prevent
certain
trades
and
kind
of
liquidity
moving,
because
you
are
relying
on
people
to
do
that,
arbitrage
between
the
different
chains-
and
I
don't
think
it's
good
for
a
token-
to
be
trading
on
different
amounts
of
different
chains.
It's
just
kind
of
like
not
good,
I
think
from
like
a
capital
efficiency
standpoint.
B
So
I
think,
as
we
look
at
the
rewards,
we
should
consider
about
how
we're
concentrating
them
on
specifically
for
the
dxd
pool,
but
also
for
the
swapper
one.
I
think
the
the
requirement-
or
I
guess
like
our
limiting
factor-
is
that
we
do
need
a
pool
on
x
die
because
that's
where
the
buyback
is
kind
of
is
being
done.
B
D
C
Worried
about
liquidity
being
thin,
then
it
would
best
serve.
You
know:
potential
new
buyers
and
just
traders
in
general
to
have
it
concentrated.
B
C
All
tough
to
we're
getting
pulled
in
every
direction
on
this
right,
because
it's
you
can't
really
ignore
maintenance.
That's
where
all
the
token
holders
are.
You
can't
ignore
x9,
because
that's
the
only
place
you
can
do
that
buyback
and
you
can't
ignore
arbitrary,
because
stuff
push
on
swapper,
so
yeah
we
got
to
find
I
mean
I
guess.
B
Well,
this
is
also
on
the
swapper
rewards
and
we're
actually
talking
about
because
we're
talking
about
like
where
we're
incentivizing
this
right
separately,
I
think,
like
the
swapper
awards
in
general,
should
also
be
thinking
about
where,
like
what
pairs
they're
going
after
that
it's
specific
to
the
chain,
but
I
guess
for
dxd
at
least
for
right
now
and
you
notice
in
maine
that
I
think
there's
like
220
thousand
dollars
in
the
swapper.
I
mean
this
or
the
dxd
west
pool
on
swapper.
So
that's
pretty
small.
B
C
And
we
could
make
it
like
something,
a
feature
to
work
on,
or
or
maybe
I
don't
know
which
squad
but
getting
the
buyback
enabled
on
either
mainnet
or
arbitrom
could
maybe
help
yeah
help
consolidate
things.
B
Just
as
a
shout
out
because
keenan
had
mentioned,
please
don't
mean
that
well,
keenan
had
mentioned
the
silo
liquidity
discussion.
We
were
talking
about
that,
and
so
I
think
we'll
try
to
continue
that
on
on
friday
strategy.
Coordination
call
to
figure
out
that,
and
not
just
for
dxd,
but
also
for,
like
all
of
the,
I
think,
for
the
swapper
pair
specifically
too,
is
thinking
about
how
that
will
silo
liquidity
across
different
chains.
B
But
on
the
kind
of
buyback
extension
proposal,
is
there
anything
any
comments
or
anything
about
any
objection?
I
guess
or
comes
before,
maybe
submitting
this
on
chain
in
the
next
day
or
so.
B
And
we'll
take
that
as
a
no
okay
direct
any
comments
to
the
forum,
then
moving
on,
I
know
we're
just
over
the
hour
here,
but
contributor
ux
check-in.
I
think
there's
kind
of
two
things
here.
Maybe
that
melanie
wants
to
talk.
H
Yeah
sure
and
guys
just
a
quick
reminder,
if
you
like
having
gotten
your
liz
con
tickets,
they
should
be
up
for
sale
right
now
on
the
list
con
site.
So
just
a
quick
reminder
to
you
guys
to
do
that
if
you
hadn't
had
a
chance
to,
but
I
did
want
to
jump
into
a
few
things
really
quickly
and
discuss
a
recent
forum
post
that
went
up
in
regards
to
requesting
funds
for
recruiting
initiatives
at
dx
style
chris.
H
If
you
could
just
link
the
the
proposal
in
the
chat,
but
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
some
color
around
the
post
and
then
details
of
plans
looking
forward.
There
are
various
ways
to
recruit
contributors
to
dick
style.
H
You
know
you
can
work
with
agencies
for
direct
placements,
recruit
by
cold
emailing
messaging
candidates
on
various
platforms
or,
as
guy
mentioned,
recruiting
at
hackathons,
but
one
method
that
we
really
haven't
explored
yet
at
dx
style
is
posting
our
open
positions
on
job
boards,
and
I
know
this
may
sound
like
a
little
bit
dated
of
a
method
of
recruiting,
especially
in
our
space.
But
I
think
it's
still
a
mess
method
that
we
should
consider
and
be
interested
in
looking
into
further.
H
There
are
a
few
reputable
organizations
that
I've
done
some
research
on
and
I'm
really
interested
in
posting
our
open
positions
at
to
start
their
a
week
in
ethereum,
cryptocurrency
jobs
and
the
job
board
at
bank
list.
I
know
many
of
you
are
familiar
with
these
sites
or,
if
you're,
not,
you
can
see
more
details
in
the
links.
I've
added
in
the
post
one
place,
I'm
particularly
interested
in
having
our
roles
featured,
is
on
bankless's
job
board,
which
does
come
at
a
more
premium
price
of
a
thousand
dollars
a
month.
H
But
this
feature
in
particular
does
include
being
at
the
top
of
their
job
boards
being
featured
in
their
weekly
newsletter,
given
special
attention
and
post
across
the
bank
list
socials
and
then
featured
on
their
weekly
roll-up
podcast
for
like
30
days.
So
I
think
getting
exposure
around
these
positions
is
super
important,
especially
for
our
dev
rolls
and
then
with
that
being
said,
we're
requesting
a
budget
of
up
to
two
thousand
dollars
a
month
to
vote
to
post
on
these
locations.
H
The
contributor
ux
will
be
responsible,
of
course,
for
tracking
the
effectiveness
of
these
posts
and
then
reporting
back
to
the
community
on
our
findings.
So
does.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
or
just
any
general
thoughts
on
this
any
suggestions
of
like
other
sites
or
places?
That
would
be
helpful.
H
And
then,
like
I
mentioned
previously
like,
we
haven't,
really
explored
this
method
of
recruiting
before.
So
it
would
be
great
to
try
all
this
for
like
a
little
bit.
Obviously,
if
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
success,
then
you
know
we
don't
have
to
continue,
but
I
think
we
should
at
least
try
it
out
and
then
give
these
three
places
like
a
chance
and
kind
of
as
a
starting
point.
C
I
was
saying
this
in
the
chat
this
morning
like
we're
in
denver
for
emicon
this
week,
and
it
didn't
take
too
many
conversations
just
to
be
kind
of
reminded
and
made
aware
of
how
little
people
are
generally
aware
of
dx
now,
and
I
think
just
getting
it
out
into
these
publications
has
has
like
a
double
effect
of.
Not
only
are
you
letting
people
know
that
we're
we're
looking
for
certain
roles,
but
also
just
like
making
people
aware
of
of
dx
tao.
So
it's
almost
like
doubling
as
a
branding
marketing
spend
as
well.
H
Yeah,
absolutely
and,
as
you
know,
like
bankless,
has
a
huge
reach
almost
up
to
100
000
followers
across
the
platforms
on
twitter
and
then
their
podcast
is,
is
pretty
popular
and
also
dave.
Just
said
this
con
tickets
are
sold
out.
H
So
sorry,
I
want,
if
you
haven't
gotten
them,
but
yeah
any
other
additional
comments
around
requesting
recruiting
funds
and
if
you
do
have
any
objections
or
if
you're,
for
it.
Please
comment
in
the
forum
I'd
like
to
probably
get
this
on
chain
in
the
next
few
days.
D
H
Awesome:
okay:
next
thing
I
wanted
to
touch
on
is
I
wanted
to
get
the
conversation
going
going
again
about
dxd
investing
for
our
contributors.
H
As
you
know,
our
contributors
should
have
a
base
pay
in
stables,
as
well
as
a
portion
of
their
salary
allocated
in
dxd,
which
is
best
vested
linearly
over
two
years
with
a
one
year
clip
at
the
moment.
Some
contributors
have
deployed
vesting
contracts,
but
currently
there
isn't
like
an
easy
to
use
system
for
this
particular
dxd
vesting.
So
it's
kind
of
created
a
backlog
for
contributors
that
have
earned
dxd,
but
luckily
that
dxd
is
still
in
dx
styles
treasury.
H
At
the
moment,
it's
not
that
huge
of
an
issue
but
could
potentially
grow
if
dxd
contributors
don't
claim
their
vex
vested
dxd.
So
today
I
want
to
bring
forward
a
few
options.
We
think
would
be
the
best
solutions
for
this.
It's
all
laid
out
in
this
proposal
that
chris
is
kind
of
going
through
right
now,
but
I
just
wanted
to
talk
to
you
and
introduce
them
to
you
first
and
then
get
any
feedback
from
you
all.
So
there
are
three
potential
ways
to
claim
your
vested
dxd.
H
One
would
be
to
deploy
mainnet
vesting
contracts
and
submit
proposals
through
digsta.
You
know
this
already
kind
of
fits
into
the
dxd
vesting
structure,
that's
laid
out
in
our
guidelines,
but
it's
definitely
an
expensive
way
because
of
gas
costs.
Most
recently
sky
deployed
his
dxd
vesting
proposals
and
they're
great
examples
to
look
at
if
this
is
the
route
that
you
would
potentially
like
to
take.
The
second
way
to
claim
your
vested
dxd
is
on
xdi
or
I'm
sorry,
on
xdx
style.
This
option
does
not
require
any
vesting
contracts.
H
Instead,
contributors
can
just
claim
their
dxd
through
their
regular
monthly
worker
proposal
once
it
becomes
available.
I
know
that
chris,
you
know,
is
potentially
going
to
use
this
option
as
he's
nearing
his
one
year
at
dx
dow.
If
chris,
you
wanted
to
mention
anything
around
this
potential
option
as
well.
B
Yeah,
I
think,
with
this
broadly
like,
as
you
said,
this
is
a
this
is
something
that
will
maybe
grow
in
importance,
but
for
like
right
now,
it's
very
much
a
case-by-case
individual
by
individual,
like
scenarios.
D
B
There's
kaden
with
a
k
to
kind
of
think
about
who's
past
the
year
and
then
also
zett
and
myself
have
just
started
passing
that
year.
So
we
can
think
about
how
how
those
for
a
lot
of
other
people
they
won't
actually
be
passing
here
for
like
two
to
three
more
months.
So
maybe
the
like
third
option
is
a
more
realistic
thing
for
for
doing
that
there
for
zet,
and
I
I
guess
that
carving
out
this
one
is
basically
right.
B
B
So
what
this
one
would
allow
you
to
do
is
basically
claim
whatever
has
been
vested
in
a
is
kind
of
after
that
year
time
period.
Now
this
would,
instead
of
being
calculated
on
a
smart
contract,
would
be
calculated
in
a
spreadsheet,
which
does
require
a
bit
more
overhead,
but
I
think
it's
important
for
at
least
getting
some
of
that
initial
dxd
there,
and
so
I
think
that's
what
I'm
planning
on
on
doing.
I
guess
in
terms
of
like
the
three
things
I
think,
the
three
things
we
were
talking
about
melanie.
B
B
One
is
agreeing
on
a
beginning
of
the
month
or
any
date
for
a
monthly
vest.
So
if
you
look
at
the
spreadsheet
now,
the
way
it's
like
calculated,
not
everyone
is
put
when
the
vesting
starts.
Typically,
people
are
paid
in
a
month,
but
they
don't
put
the
specific
date
and
for
like
accounting
purposes,
it
would
be
much
easier
if
we
had
like
everybody
in
this
month's
dxd
vested
on
a
certain
date,
whether
that
was
the
15th
or
the
beginning
of
the
month.
I
think
it
would
be
easier
that
way.
B
Second
is:
if
contributors
choose
to
do
mainnet,
I
think
we
should
agree
that
they
can
combine
up
to
four
months
in
a
single
proposal,
and
so
this
is
what
sky
did
and
that
the
agreement
would
be.
B
You
could
do
your
four
months
of
dxd
investing,
but
the
vesting
date
be
the
beginning
of
the
third
month,
so
you
would
be
getting
some
dxd
investing
a
little
bit
later
than
you
should,
but
you're
getting
other
dhd
investing
a
little
bit
earlier,
but
I
think
that
would
save
gas
costs
and
save
like
proposal
headaches
elsewhere,
and
so
I
think
we
should
agree
on
some
way
to
combine
several
month.
B
Dxd
payments
for
those
that
want
to
submit
contracts
on
mainnet
now
and
then,
like
the
third
thing
is
going
forward,
is
agreeing
that
the
dxd
price
should
be
calculated
when
the
when
your
worker
proposal
starts
so
like
the
first
day
of
your
worker
proposal,
whatever
that
ends
up
being
right.
B
So
if
you,
even
if
you
end
up
submitting
it
a
month
before
or
month
after,
it
is
on
like
the
day
of
your
first
worker
proposal,
that
actually
the
the
divesting
starts,
and
I
think
those
are
all
different
suggestions
that
we
can
kind
of
think
about.
But
I
think
those
would
really
help
with
like
going
through
on
this
process.
I
don't
know
if
anyone
had
any
questions
on
that
now
or
we
can
chat
about
it
in
the
ux
call.
A
Chris,
just
just
to
clarify
on
the
one
that
was
combined.
So
if
we
did
combine,
if
you
combine
two
different
periods
into
one,
there
was
none
was
received
earlier.
All
was
received
later
than
than
expected.
So,
okay,
yeah.
C
Yeah-
and
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
that
this
is
a
bit
of
a
headache
and
apologize
from
the
technical
side.
This
is
one
of
you
know,
one
of
the
things
that
we
had
had
a
couple
of
attempts
to
solve
that
didn't
get
across
the
finish
line,
and
it
is
obviously
important
so
yeah.
I
apologize
to
anybody
who's
kind
of
feeling
stressed
about
this
or
wondering
why
their
dxd
isn't.
C
A
And
there
was
obviously
talk
of,
like
people
might
not
be
comfortable,
locking
up
certain
amounts
of
dxd
in
a
vesting
contract
on
xdi.
But
if
we
took
that
approach,
the
vesting
contract
solves
the
accounting
headache,
the
calculation
headache
the
when
you
do
the
proposal-
headache
the
actual
investing
contract.
The
code
makes
it
super
easy.
So
if
you
will
be
willing
to
do
it
on
xdi,
we
can
do
the
best
in
contracts
on
x
die
and
then
there
is
no
headache.
C
And
the
goal
will
be
with
the
governance,
to
have
it
all
automated
right.
This
should
should
be
something
that
is
simply
done
through
the
governance.
Ui
like
you,
should
be
getting
approved
for
your
periods
and
basically
clicking
a
button
to
collect
whenever
it's
ready
right
and
the
accounting
should
be
handled
on
chain
right.
We
have
the
the
power
of
software
like
to
handle
this
stuff,
and
it
shouldn't
be
an
accounting
headache,
and
it's
just
a
matter
of
we're
not
there
where
we
need
to
be
technically
yet
and
so
we're
relying
upon.
B
Yeah
and
sky,
I
think
that
could
be
another
option
right.
The
contracts
are
next.
I
guess,
like
I
think,
that's
like
a
medium
term
option.
Maybe
it
doesn't
really
it's
like
a
too
cold
or
too
hot,
because
I
think
we
need
something
that
works
like
right
now,
that
would
be
you
know,
getting
the
dc
and
then
the
long-term
solution
of
like
developing
the
whole
system.
B
A
A
You've
passed
through
one
year
september
1st,
instead
of
you
trying
to
figure
out
on
september
15th
how
much
dxd
is
unlocked,
because
you
now
one
year
plus
15
days
since
you're
gonna
request
this
kind
of
first
amount
that
as
you've
already
passed
from
the
past,
it
might
be
easier
for
just
you
to
like.
Have
the
vesting
contract
on
x
die
and
then
let
it
handle
you.
So
then
you
can
just
withdraw
it
over
time
over
the
next
year.
Just
for
this
one
off
one,
that's
already.
B
Passed
yeah,
I'm
not
I
I
I'm
open
to
this,
and
it
says
that
I
think
this
is
like
we
should
done
this
like
case
like
a
scenario,
so
caden,
for
instance,
is
interested
in
doing
it
on
main
net
and
because,
like
he's
technically,
he
can
kind
of
do
that
himself.
So
he's
looking
for
clarity
specifically
on
how
to
combine
the
proposals
and
then
I
think,
with
that
myself
there
I
think
it
will
be
like
the
next
month
or
two.
B
We
can
figure
out
something
that
fits
for
that,
but
I
do
think
it's
just
like
giving
people
options
to
be
able
to
to
do
this
and
augusto
has
the
best
solution.
First,
we
could
just
use
dx
vote
yeah.
I
mean
that's
yeah,
so
that's
why
I
think
we
don't.
We
don't
want
to
put
too
much
effort
into
kind
of
like
you
know,
solving
this
in
the
short
term,
because
it's
actually.
B
Problem
right
now,
the
big
problem
is
that
maybe
people
like,
if
you're
afraid,
that
the
dow
won't
pay
you
like
if
it's
an
investing
contract,
the
dhd
is
there
and,
like
you,
know,
that's
kind
of
there.
So
there
is
a
little
bit
of
trust,
so
I'm
very
open
to
anyone.
That's
like
I've
earned
this
dxd.
It
says
it's
gonna
be
invested
in
a
year.
I
want
to
have
an
investing
contract
that,
like
I
can
claim
and
like
that's
the
way
to
do
we
can.
B
Okay
well
before
we
get
into
this,
because
actually
the
other
thing
is
no
matter
what
the
solution
is.
We
like
have
to
figure
out
the
accounting
for
all
of
this,
and
that's
like
a
bigger
headache
to
get
the
consensus
for
that.
It's
like
we
have
to
get
the
spreadsheet
for
that
and
then
once
we
get
everything
figured
out
like
you
can
you
know
set
it
any
system.
E
Well,
but
the
best
solution,
when
you
get
the
one
that
when
you
get
the
accounting
and
you
know
which
dx
investing
you
we
have
to
deploy
for
each
developer,
it's
me
once
you
get
all
the
dxd
best
that
you
need
to
deploy.
I
can
deploy
them.
I
can
as
a
reform
later
and
I
can
deploy
either
all
the
dx
investing
for
follow
workers
or
minute.
I
can
document
the
process
and
it's
going
to
be
super
easy,
so
yeah.
So.
B
E
If
we
know
which
best
thing
go,
which
vessel
do
we
do,
we
have
to
deploy
and
how
much
the
xz
we
are
going
to
need.
I
can
deploy
the
vesting
contracts,
we
send
the
dxe
to
the
the
exit
to
the
multisignature
wallet
and
from
the
multi-signature
that
we
are
using
a
minute.
We
send
the
dxe
to
each
best
in
contract.
Let's
say
if
we
are
10
workers
and
we
have
to
create
for
vesting
for
each
for
each
worker.
We
have
to
deploy
40
investings,
and
that
is
going
to
take
us.
E
I
don't
know
a
south
and
dxe.
We
send
that
to
the
multi
signature
and
we
send
one
to
between
the
40
dx,
investing
that
we
are
creating
it's
going
to
take
some
time,
maybe
like
a
few
hours
to
execute
to
create
all
those
40
besting
contracts.
But
again
that
is
something
that
we
will
need
to
execute.
Every
few
months
till
we
get
the
expo
automated
and
we
can
do
it
on
each
proposal
automatically.
C
E
Yeah
also,
I
don't
have
to
hold
the
dlc,
I
mean
we
can
send
the
dxe
to
the
miniature
wallet
and
that's
it
I.
The
only
thing
I
need
to
know
is
which
address
is
going
to
receive
the
dxe,
the
start
date,
the
the
date
that
is
going
to
end
and
that's
it
then
the
the
best
interest
there
or
the
same
or
even
skype
can
create
the
directing
contracts.
E
So
we
have
plenty
of
people
that
can
create
there,
and
this
is
only
a
matter
of
time
till
we
get
dx
vote
on
mainnet,
where
we
are
going
to
have
proposals
that,
for
example,
let's
say
the
payment
is
going
to
be
this
amount
of
diet.
To
this
address,
we
are
going
to
meet
reputation
to
this
beneficiary
address.
We
are
going
to
meet
an
nf,
let's
say
an
nft
token,
that
represents
a
worker
perio
proposal
and
we
are
going
to
create
the
dx
investing
content
and
also
send
the
dxd
tokens.
E
B
Yeah
and
just
to
so,
I
think
we
want
to
have
the
three
options
right
and
just
to
kind
of
to
give
people,
because
I
think
we
just
want
to
like
give
people
these
options.
So
the
first
option
is,
you
can
deploy
your
main
net
contracts
yourself
according
to
that,
the
second
is
to
be
able
to
claim
on
x,
die,
and
the
third
really
is
wait
for
dx
gov
dev,
to
kind
of
deploy
for
you
or
build
that
process
and,
like
I
think,
a
lot
of
people
like
I
consider
part
of
myself.
B
I
could
wait
for
that,
because
that's
what's
more
important,
but
that
does
require
a
little
bit
of
like
waiting.
So
I
just
want
to
get
by
giving
people
all
those
options
and
then
just
like
the
the
two
other
things
on
that
are
or
one
yeah,
the
two
other
things
on
that
or
with
this
post
that
we'll
have
is
those
would
be
the
three
options.
The
three
is
to
claim
and
then
second,
we'll
want
to
have
a
spreadsheet
that
is
like
this
is
gospel.
B
This
is
what
the
contributor
ux
accounting
is
for,
like
people
at
the
dxd
awards.
Please
make
sure
there
are
any
changes
of
that
and
ali's
been
reaching
out
to
people
for
that
in
the
past.
So
hopefully
there's
not
any
surprises
there,
but
we'll
have
that
and
then
the
third
thing
is
just
some
clarification
on
some
of
these,
like
accounting
things,
so
we
can
have
some
agreement
there
and
so.
D
E
Wouldn't
everyone
to
wait,
because
if
we
take
this
action,
this
will
happen
a
minute.
I
would
encourage
everyone
to
take
the
dxe
best.
You
know
one
minute
trust
only
because
the
the
western
country
is
going
to
run
for
two
years
and
you
don't
know
what's
going
to
happen
on
arbitrage
in
two
years,
but
we
know
what
is
going
to
happen
on
mainnet.
It's
going
to
still
be
there.
So
if
you
do
it
yourself,
you
do
it
on
minute
or
wait
for
us
till
we
do
it
for
your
magnet.
B
B
Yeah,
it's
got,
usdc
is
6
decibels.
That's
like
the.
B
H
C
C
A
B
Cool
and
maybe
a
little
pretty-
I
guess-
keenan
tomorrow-
1500
utc
is
farming
launch.
I
don't
know,
I
think
we're
looking
to
do.
I
guess
a
call,
but
maybe
it'll
be
a
discord
or.
I
Yeah
look
for
an
announcement
sometime
in
the
next
hour
or
two
here
on
on
what
the
exact
plan
will
be,
but
probably
we'll
have
a
fun
kind
of
programmed
event,
half
an
hour
before
the
launch
of
farming
and
chatting
throughout
the
launch.
A
Yeah,
which
is
good
people,
I
think
some
people
are,
people
are
getting
bored
of
just
the
regular.
We
recap
call
so
we're
gonna
experiment.
Well,
this
is
a
good
experiment
and
a
fun
experiment,
but
maybe
like
another
community
ama
and
things
like
that.
So
maybe
only
one
recap
call
a
month
or
something.