►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2020-01-20]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
geeksdale's
governance,
discussion
for
january
20th,
2021
happy
inauguration
day
to
start
off
with
just
a
kind
of
like
housekeeping
things,
so
the
governance
refunds
round
three
can
be
claimed.
So
this
is
reimbursement
for
voting
proposal,
submission
and
staking.
I
believe
this
one
actually
is
included
to
90
reimbursement
and
yeah.
There's
an
easy
to
use
guide
there
to
to
kind
of
get
that
so
claim.
B
Anyone
that's
voted
or
proposed
or
submitted
can
claim
their
gas
refunds
and
then
second,
I
started
a
another
round
of
rep
boost
here,
and
so
I'm
a
rep
booster
away
that
we're
trying
to
reward
new
community
contributors
to
dx
dow
and
by
giving
them
and
issuing
them
some
rep.
So
we've
been
doing,
I
think
this
is
our
fourth
month
that
we've
done
this
so
far.
There's
a
couple
nominations
that
I
had
be
happy
to
have
other
people
follow
them
up
on
the
thread.
B
B
Rep
there's
no
such
thing
as
like
or
yes,
a
rep
boost
does
not
expire,
and
so
hopefully
these
people
can
kind
of
claim
it
whenever
gas
prices
return
or
we
think
of
a
more
cost-efficient
way
of
issuing
rep,
and
I
think
that's
kind
of
the
the
crux
of
the
issue
now
is
it's
just
not
really
worth
it
for
to
to
go
through
all
of
that
hassle,
even
if
you
get
refunded
after
a
month.
B
A
Yeah
eventually,
I
don't
think
the
multi-call
does
it,
but
maybe
augusto's
version
of
a
multi-call.
Does
it
where
you
can
do
one
proposal
and
give
out
rep
to
like
10
addresses
at
the
same
time,
assuming
you
have
their
addresses
and
you
have
their
permission.
A
C
Can
can
we,
I
don't
know
how
it
works,
but
can
we
do
so
the
owner
of
the
wallet
like
signs
a
message
or
something
and
and
then
it
adds
to
some
kind
of
list
where,
in
the
end
of
the
month,
we
push
one
proposal.
D
A
E
Yeah
so
like
in
theory,
it
has
the
permission,
but
I'm
not
100
sure
I
didn't
check
that,
but
I
can
take
it
with
me
and
check
it
and
give
some
feedback
later.
If
it's
working
or
not.
C
I
think,
like
from
the
conversation
I
had,
I
I
nominated
some
people
and
and
all
three
people,
none
of
them
claimed
their
rep
actually
and
from
what
what
I
heard
it's
it's
like
three
things.
It's
too
complicated.
They
need
to
learn
too
much
and
they
don't
know
where
to
start
and
third
thing.
Obviously
the
gas
cost.
I
don't
think
they
even
know
the
gas
cost.
So
it's
it's
more
of
an
experience
issue
versus.
I
think
people
are
just
lazy
and
and
and
that's
not
their
fault,.
A
So
if
it
was
instead
of
getting
some
rep,
if
it
was
getting
seven
thousand
dollars,
that
would
do
it
hundred
percent
okay,
so
like
they
don't
care
about
the
rep.
C
They
don't
know,
no,
no,
I
mean
I,
I
think
they
care
they
care
a
lot.
They're
super
happy
and,
like
I,
I
would
say,
there's
a
fine
line
in
crypto
where
people
are
just
like
it's
too
much
effort
and
maybe
think
I'm
gonna
do
later
or
I'm
like.
Look
at
me.
I
I
haven't
done
a
single
dxd,
like
I
haven't
asked
for
my
dxt
a
single
time
for
my
whole
like
well.
Now
it's
probably
expired.
You
you,
if
you
don't
claim.
A
B
B
Yeah
no,
but
I
think
just
to
like
kind
of
put
a
bit
on
this,
we
do
want
to
have
some
proactive
measure
so
that
people
are
like
acting
like
requesting
rep
that
they're
like
confirming
that.
But
I
think
we
want
to
make
that
as
low
as
possible.
So
if
it
is
just
like
signing
a
message,
I
think
that
would
that
would
kind
of
take
that,
but
I
think
we
need
to
work
on
how
we're
issuing
this
rep
like
more
in
a
more
gas
efficient
way.
B
I
think
we're
going
to
run
into
this
problem
like
a
lot,
because
I
mean
we
can't
scale
rep
if
everyone
like
it's,
that
means
it
would
cost
like
basically
a
hundred
dollars
to
issue
rep
to
an
address
each
time
and
that's
not
like
a
va,
if
the,
even
if
the
dow
is
paying
for
it.
That's
not
a
very
like
efficient
way
to
scale
that,
so
I
don't.
B
I
think
it
was
something
she's
worried,
worried
about
and
kind
of
working
on,
but
I
think
we
can
still
like
try
to
continue
to
encourage
people
to
become
more
involved
and
kind
of
do
these
rep
boosts,
even
if
we
don't
have
like
the
technical
capabilities
to
do
it
in
a
gas
efficient
way.
C
Do
you
know
who's
the
perfect
candidate
to
like
talk
to
like
for
30
minutes
and
just
ask?
How
should
we
do
this?
It's
the
pull-up
guy,
the
guy
that
likes
delivers,
delivers
nfts
for
events
right.
So
he
has
like.
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
claimed
your
if,
if
you're
watching
when
e
2.0
was
released,
you
got
an
nft.
C
D
Patricio
is
actually
in
the
the
key
base,
so
we
could
pick
them
in
there
potentially
yeah.
I
think
the
one
kind
of
difference
here,
though,
is
like
in
theory.
I
think
these
replicas
should
be
going
to
people
who
actually
want
to
govern.
It's,
not
just
a
collectible
right,
like
I
think
so
to
me
that,
like
having
a
little
bit
of
a
barrier
that
is
basically
equivalent
to
what
it
would
be
like
to
participate
in,
governance
makes
total
sense.
D
C
F
I
think
this
also
just
relates
to
how
we
need
to
simplify
governance
in
general.
I
think
john's
point
is
super
accurate
and
it's
just
a
reflection
of
you
know:
low
participation
rates
so
obviously
gusto
and
others
are
working
on
improving
that,
but
yeah.
In
the
meantime,
something
would
be
useful,
but
I
think
it's
an
overall
system
overhaul
issue.
G
G
It's
just
like
a
simple
transaction.
People
can
redeem
reputation
from
that
thing,
so
that
actually
can
be
used
with
anything.
You
can
give
it
a
json
list
so
like.
If
we
add
that
we
can
probably
call,
and
every
month
there
will
be
like
one
multi
call
that
basically
adds
a
new
list
and
then
all
the
people
in
that
list
could
redeem
the
reputation
and
it
it's
like.
Just
like
you
said,
like
you,
I
was
working
with
patricio
in
berlin
and
he
kind
of
saw
that
that's
how
we
were
given
a
reputation.
G
A
G
A
Yeah
and
like
similar
to
the
competition
scheme
right
like
the
three
winners
like
the
dow,
has
put
rep
and
die
in
some
bucket
and
then
the
three
winners
who
win
that
competition,
which
we've
done
on
xdi
they
go
and
they
have
to
claim
it
like.
If
they
don't
claim
it.
It
just
sits
there,
but
it's
they
just
make
a
simple
claim
of
the
rep
that
they
won
in
the
competition
right.
G
B
Cool
yeah,
something
to
continue
work
on
for
that,
but
if
you
have
nominations
in
the
meantime,
I
think
it's
good
to
continue
this
just
as
a
way
of
recognizing
people
that
are
contributing
wanted
to
move
on
to
the
proposal.
Roundup,
I'm
actually
going
to
share
my
screen
just
for
that
and
yeah
just
going
through.
I
think
we
have
20
like
22
proposals
or
something
right
now,
so
it's
kind
of
a
pretty
active
thing
we
can.
B
We
could
talk
about
how
to
make
that
better,
but
just
there's
a
bunch
of
different
worker
proposals.
I
think
pulp
is
going
through
there,
also
my
own
worker
proposal
and
I
think
level
k
and
john
and
then
dev
violet,
so
a
couple
different
ones.
There
there's
also
the
multi-call
scheme,
which
is
a
plug-in
where's
that
one
yeah
that's
a
plug-in
that
well.
I
think
it's
set
to
pass
in
just
under
eight
days,
so
we're
doing
some
testing
now
on
x,
die
for
that.
I
think
we
just
said.
B
I
think
john
just
sent
the
first
like
multi-call
trade
on
x
died
so
we'll.
I
think
that
proposal
needs
to
pass,
but
hopefully
that
will
be
the
the
first
yeah
like
multi,
like
multi
call
trader
by
dick
stout,
even
though
it's
on
x
die.
So
if
that
goes
ahead,
I
think
the
the
multi-call
scheme
hopefully
can
go
ahead,
and
so
that
is
set
to
pass.
I
think
in
eight
days
I
don't
think
john.
If
anyone
had
any
thoughts
to
add
on
the
multi-call
scheme,
nico.
D
Yeah,
I
just
tried
it
out
on
x9.
I
think
we
should
probably
write
a
little
bit
of
a
guide
just
to
make
it
a
little
bit
easier.
I'm
not
100
sure
I
did
it
right.
So
hopefully,
nico
will
double
check
my
proposal
and
we
can
boost
that
today.
Hopefully,
that
works,
I
think
it
was
a
proposal
to
to
trade.
300
x,
died
for
steak
on
nose's
protocol
on
xxx,
because
this
protocol
actually
is
deployed
on
on
next
I
and
yeah.
D
So
hopefully
that
will
give
us
some
confidence
that
the
mainnet
setup
will
work,
but
once
the
multi-constellation
is
live
on
midnight,
I
think
the
first
step
would
be
to
test
it
with
some.
Like,
oh,
like
you
know,
moderate
amounts,
not
too
big.
You
know
I'm
thinking
like
20
000
or
something
just
to
make
sure
it
works
and
then
escalate
it
from
from
there.
B
Yeah
and
I
just
noticing
it
on
xdi,
so
it
is
like
two
different
proposals
because
there's
like
the
relay
itself
that
gets
funded
from
the
funding
and
voting
power
scheme
and
then
the
multi-cal
scheme
proposal
would
then
like
trade,
the
funds
in
the
relayer
or
potentially
provide
liquidity
on
swapper
and
that's
a
security
feature
so
that
we
don't
have
funds
moving
out
of
the
treasury
from
the
multi-call
scheme.
D
B
Cool
and
the
other
kind
of
fun
thing
going
on
in
governance
is,
we
are
in
installing
I
guess
three
new
subject:
domains
for
the
ens
domains
and
so
omen,
I
think,
is
the
first
one
here
that
we're
doing
it.
So
this
would
create
a
separate,
xdi.omen.eth1
and
also
one
for
sokol,
and
then
I
think,
one
for
rinkeby.
So
this
is
like,
I
think,
a
good.
B
I
think
this
is
related
to
the
cloud
fair
in
ethe.link
tie
up,
but
that's
kind
of
good,
to
see
some
development
on
that,
and
this
will
be
hopefully
something
we
can
use
for
all
of
our
products
there,
and
so,
when
those
go
through
specifically
the
xdy1.
That
will
pave
the
way
for
the
xdi
launch
of
omen,
which
I
think
will
presumably
be
back
in
the
regular
ens
public
resolver
scheme.
But
this
proposal,
that's
in
there
now
is
to
set
up
these
new
domains.
H
Yeah
on
that
point,
we
actually
thought
about
how
to
improve
the
subdomain
stuff.
So
the
way
we're
gonna
do
it
is
we're
gonna
packaging
up
omen.ethe
into
like
mainnet
and
wrinklebuy
and
xdy.omen.ethe
will
be
packaged
into
like
x,
die
network
and
the
the
test
network
circle.
H
So
we
will
just
use
like
one
subdomain,
which
is
xdar.org.eath,
and
then
you
can
switch
between
test
network
and
x
die
just
to
make
sure
like
to
not
complicate
things
yeah.
So
that's
on
that,
like
I
don't
expect,
we
will
use
circle,
dot,
omen.et
and
of
wrinkybite.com.
B
Yeah
and
just
thinking
a
little
bit
like
future,
I
guess
we
could
even
do
this
like
for
mesa
in
the
future.
If
we
wanted
to
have
like
an
idea
specific
address,
would
that
would
that
kind
of
be
possible?
We
wanted
to
have
like
whatever
ideo
dot
mesa.eth
and
that
could
be
like
the
home
for
the
ido,
so
I
think
sub
domains
could
be,
could
be
really
interesting.
H
Yeah,
exactly
like
that's
actually
like
a
really
huge
use
case,
sounds
like
a
small
thing,
but
I
think
projects
would
love
to
see
that
yeah.
A
Are
we
pretty
confident
that
these
things
are
working
because
I
know
the
subdomains
like
the
first
time
a
lot
of
people
were
going
to
them
were
like
just
not
going
anywhere
and
then,
like
you
refresh
a
few
times,
and
eventually
you
get
to
the
page.
But
if,
if
that
happens,
for
every
user,
that's
a
bad
experience
right,
but.
H
Yeah
we're
testing
we're
like
we
need
to
make
sure
that
it
will
work,
and
that
means
we
need
to
test
things.
So
we
tested
it
and
it
did
not
work.
So
we
created
some
domain
put
stuff
into
it
and
then
it
just
didn't
work
like
there
were
cloud,
fair
issues
and
luckily
the
ens
team
is
actually
really
a
response.
Responsive
so
reaching
out
to
them
is
is
not,
is
not
an
issue
and
it
seems
like
they.
They
have.
H
So
I
don't
even
think
we
will
need
the
enf
team
to
fix
their
if
there
is
if
there
are
issues,
but
it
looks
like
they're
they're
preparing
the
this
infrastructure
in
a
way
that
supports
as
less
support
as
possible.
So
I
think
it
will
work.
B
In
somewhat
related
news,
brave
just
announced
support
for
ipfs,
and
so
I
think,
that's
kind
of
just
a
exciting
development,
maybe
not
that
helpful
to
our
products
now,
but
I
think
it
just
kind
of
shows.
Maybe
some
capabilities
in
how
browsers
can
can
be
very
helpful,
we'll
be
waiting
for
when
they
have
native
ens
support.
H
B
Yeah
we'll
see
just
moving
along
seems
like
a
lifetime
ago
now,
but
a
big
kind
of
proposal
was
submitted.
I
think
it
was
on
friday
night
the
treasury
authorization
proposal,
so
we
think
we've
talked
a
lot
about
treasury
diversification
this
month
and
the
need
to
get
some
stable
coins
both
for
worker
payments
and
also
general
diversification,
and
so
john.
B
I
believe
it
submitted
this
proposal
that
kind
of
lays
out
a
plan
of
action
here
and
like
an
overall
target
that
we're
trying
to
do
and
also
that
the
three
different
ways
that
we
can
kind
of
go
about
doing
this
so
john,
I
don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
kind
of
set
up
or
add
anything
to
this.
D
Yeah,
I
mean-
I
think
you
summarized
it
like
this
is
basically
to
clear
the
way,
for
you
know
the
treasury
to
be
diversified
into
some
stable
coins
kind
of
lays
out
which
stable
coins,
how
much
and
the
ways
which
are
acceptable
to
do
it
and
how
they
should
be
done.
I
try
to
be
pretty
specific
with
the
language
here
so
that
there
wasn't
any
room
for
confusion
or
interpretation
when
people
kind
of
go
about
these
things,
I
think
you
know.
D
Basically,
I
think
the
main
reason
for
this
is
that
the
number
one
method
here
the
nurses
protocol
relayer,
like
we
discussed
earlier,
is
going
to
take
a
little
bit
of
time
to
kind
of
get
up
to
speed
and
with
the
market
kind
of
where
it
is
and
the
gains
that
the
treasury
has
seen
in
ether.
It
seems
sort
of
you
know,
maybe
not
urgent
but
pressing,
to
start
this
diversification
process.
D
So
that's
why
we
are
kind
of
adding
the
second
and
third
methods,
which
is
you
know,
leveraging
the
multisig
that
the
that
has
a
bunch
of
people
from
rep
holders
on
it
already
that
has
been
used
before.
D
I
think
we
need
to
do
some
verification
process
around
that
to
add
extra
trans
make
sure,
there's
plenty
of
transparency
there
and,
and
then
this
third
method,
which
was
you
know,
credit
to
sky.
D
For
detailing
this,
I
think
this
is
maybe
actually
a
little
bit
of
a
boiled
down
simplified
version
of
what
sky
had
proposed,
but
basically
letting
people
send
stable
coins
to
the
treasury
and
requesting
for
reimbursement
and
ether
at
the
same
same
time,
so
you
know
what's
cool
about
that
is
it
doesn't
really
require
trust
from
the
dow
side
and
yeah?
So
I
guess
like
one.
One
point
that
I
was
not
super
clear
on
with
this
is
is
like
what
was
the
appropriate
incentive
for
the
member
balancer?
We
ended
up
settling
on
one
percent.
D
You
know
I
had
checked
in
with
you
know
sky
I
think
was
advocating
for
two
percent.
I
I
wasn't
so
confident
that
I
was
a
little
bit
worried
that
it
might
be
perceived
in
the
wrong
way
and
like
perceived
as
you
know,
people
trying
to
take
money
from
the
treasury.
But
of
course
the
flip
side
is,
there
needs
to
be
an
adequate
incentive.
So
I.
C
D
Like
one
percent
is
a
decent
number,
you
know
if
you
assume
that
somebody
is,
we
want
to
minimize
costs
if
you
think
about
targeting
long-term
ether
holders,
if
somebody's
holding
eth
they're
going
to
have
to
incur
some
cost
to
make
the
trade
you
know
0.3
on
uniswap
and
then
they're
actually
like
losing
access
to
that
eath
for
about
a
week
but
they're
I
mean
because
we're
letting
people
do
the
proposal
at
the
cost
that
they
made
the
trade
it's
kind
of
risk-free
in
that
sense.
D
So
I
don't
know
what
one
percent
seemed
like
a
good
number.
You
know
maybe
they're
taking
point
five
percent
after
the
cost
that
they
incur,
and
that
is
in
return
for
locking
it
up
for
a
week.
I
mean
it's
not
really
a
great
comparison,
but
just
to
kind
of
provide
some
reference.
D
You
know
if
you
get
0.5
like
every
8
days
or
about
a
week,
that's
like
25
for
the
year.
You
know,
and
that's
kind
of
like
the
apy
again,
not
a
great
number,
but
just
to
kind
of
anchor
it
into
some
of
how
people
think
about
this
stuff
with
yield,
farming
and
snaking
and
stuff.
It
just
seemed
like
an
adequate,
but
you
know
competitive
and
low
number,
and
I
guess
we
can
always
see
how
it
works
out
and
if
it
doesn't
work
we
can
change
it.
A
Other
big
benefit
is
not
not
only
that
it's
trustless,
but
it's
the
only
way
for
the
dow
to
get
things
it
needs
immediately
like
instantly
right
and
like
because
no
matter
if,
if
we,
if
we
do
these
like
other
multi-call
proposals
and
things
like
the
fastest
it
takes,
is
like
seven
eight
days
right,
if
you,
if,
if
eth
spiked
to
2000-
and
there
was
like
an
immediate
need
to
do
some
exchange
or
something
like
this-
is
an
instant
method
versus
like
a
one
week,
long
method.
So
that's
another
benefit.
B
Yeah
and
just
there
is
a,
I
think,
kind
of
the
instant
benefit
right.
There
is
currently
a
proposal
for
the
this
member
balancer
and
that's
more
specifically
for
because
we
needed
to
get
usdt
in
the
treasury
immediately
in
order
to
do
like
the
tenderly
payment.
So
I
think
that
speaks
to
speaks
to
that.
I
think
it
is.
B
B
I
think
it's
hard
to
say,
but
I
think
the
middle
one
actually
to
me
is
probably
the
most
yeah
there's
the
the
highest
trust
assumptions,
but
I
think,
as
long
as
we
are
smart
about
the
verification
I
think
of
rep
addresses,
I
think
it's
a
very
safe
way
or
not
say
it's
a
very
quick
way
and
clear
way
to
be
able
to
to
do
this.
So
I
think
that
for
all
of
these,
we
should
be
employing
all
of
them
in
kind
of
small
amounts.
There.
D
The
other
thing
I'd
kind
of
like
to
get
a
little
attention
on
and
maybe
some
feedback
on
is
the
balance.
You
know
the
breakdown
of
the
different
stable
coins.
I
think
there
was
a
comment
in
dow
talk
from
I
forget
who
maybe
mad
maxwell
or
I
forget,
but
somebody
said
it
was
pointing
out
that
tether
is
maybe
not
the
best
coin
to
be
holding
kind
of
citing
the
case.
D
The
us
case
against
them-
and
you
know
some
general
distrust
of
tether,
but
I
I
kind
of
yeah
I
was
thinking,
that's
why
it's
got
a
lower
weight
and
we
can
use
it
in
swapper
and
it
is,
you
know,
heavily
traded.
So
that's
useful,
but
I
don't
know,
maybe
maybe
it
doesn't
make
sense.
A
It
makes
sense
to
have
tether
for
if
tether
is
being
used
in
a
specific
pool
on
swapper.
That,
like
is
gonna,
get
fees
and
have
benefit
from
that,
but
like
holding
extra
tether
in
dx
dial
just
to
because
for
payments
and
stuff.
I
agree
it
doesn't,
is
not
the
ideal
token
to
hold,
and
maybe
not
even
usdc,
which
can
be
blacklisted.
B
B
G
B
B
Yeah-
and
I
I
think,
that's
why,
like
the
I
think,
the
approach
from
dxdow's
perspective
is
to
not
be
beholden
to
a
single
one,
because
I
think
actually
usdt
does
have
some
extra
territoriality
where
usdc
does
not.
Susd
could
be
considered
like
the
only
one
that's
collateralized
on
chain,
even
though
they
have
like
a
very
centralized
team
there
and
like
die
yeah.
B
I
think
long
term,
maybe
the
end
up
being
the
most
decentralized
one,
but
I
think
the
approach
at
the
moment,
because
we
there
is
such
a
pressing
need
to
have
stability
in
there,
I
think,
is
to
diversify
across
these
moving
forward.
I
would
like
for
us
to
be
able
to
introduce
other
stable
assets
once
they've
demonstrated
some
track
record,
so
I
think
specifically
thinking
about
some
of
the
algorithmic
stable
coins
and
also
rye
rai,
which
is
like
supposed
to
be
kind
of
the
stable
collateral
that
uses
like
a
automatization
method.
B
So
I
think
all
of
those
will
be
will
be
options.
I
just
think
for
right
now
we
don't.
This
is
kind
of
all
we
all.
We
have.
A
What
about
non-us
dollar
coins
like
other
stable
likes
since,
like
martin,
probably
wants
synthetic
swiss
francs
we
could
become.
We
could
hold
global
stable
coins,
not
just
the
dollar-based
ones,
right.
A
D
I
mean
there's
other
synthetics
to
it.
I
mean
you
could
even
do
like
stocks
and
stuff
with
some
of
these
right
like
us,
but
mirror
and
yeah.
B
D
Yeah,
I
think
that
the
immediate
goal
here
is
to
secure
some
of
the
runway,
but,
like
more
general
diversification,
I
think
needs
more
attention
and
like
we
could,
we
could
add
more
proposals
like
this
to
kind
of
authorize
those
types
of
things
too.
Once
people
have
you
know
if
people
have
like
you
know,
bitcoin
or
something
it
could
make
sense.
B
Cool
any
other
thoughts
on
this.
As
I
said
this
will
go.
I
think
it
will
pass
in
three
days
and
there
is
a
currently
a
proposal
for
in
the
queue
for
a
hundred
eighth
payout
to,
I
believe
the
mult
I
mean
the
multi-sig.
I
I
think
I
don't
there's
anyone.
That's
voted
on
that,
yet
I
would
kind
of
prefer
for
a
diversification
to
go
through
the
this
kind
of
authorization
process
that
john
laid
out
once
this
is
passed.
B
D
D
I
have
faith
that
this
is
in
good
good
faith
here
in
this
proposal,
but
I
would
like
to
see
some
of
that
signature.
Verification
of
the
multi-stakeholders
in
a
proposal
just
to
add
extra
confirmation,
and
I
tried
to
outline
how
that
could
be
done
in
the
authorization
proposal.
D
It's
a
little
tricky
because
gnosis
safes
can't
sign
messages
which
is
like
a
bit
limiting,
and
you
know
a
lot
of
the
rep
holding
is
in
no
so
safe.
So
I
think
we're
kind
of
following
what
what
the
suggestion
there
was-
and
this
was
kind
of
discussed
in
some
other
threads,
but
it
was
to
use
key
base
right
and
like
use
people's
profiles
on
key
base
to
connect
them
from
this
multisig
to
their
rapid
address
and
verify
that
this
multi-sync
is
indeed
a
bunch
of
like
significant
rep
holders.
B
And
I
think,
even
I
think
skye
may
have
done
this,
where
he
had
tied
where
he
had
tied
his
key
base.
Verification
to
like
a
worker
proposal
so
therefore
like
there
would
be
some
like
link
between
those
but
yeah.
I
agree
that
that
the
kind
of
verification
process
is
important
because
it's
not
just
about
like
the
people
on
this
call
trusting
people
in
this
call
it's
like
reports.
B
You
know
450
rep
holders
being
able
to
like
verify
this
in
a
completely
independent
way
and
feel
comfortable
with
it,
and
also
that
we're
kind
of
you
know
we're
setting
a
standard
and
a
precedent
for
how
these
things
will
operate
in
the
future,
and
I
think
the
having
the
verification
process
is
an
important
part
of
that.
A
Yeah,
the,
I
think
the
verification
in
certain
circumstances
makes
sense,
probably
in
this
dev
dx,
dow
dev
multisig,
which
already
exists
and
there's
already
some
verification.
A
Just
keep
in
mind,
though,
that
there
are
community
members
that
that
do
like
release
products
or
participate
in
aspects
of
dx
style
workings
like
reimburse
you
know
like
there
are
you
you
don't
want
to
you,
don't
necessarily
need
to
verify
all
rep
holders
to
all
like
wall
addresses
to
document
everything
across
the
board
like,
and
that
may
cause
problems
too.
D
Right
well
sometimes
like
if
there
may
be
pseudonymous
members
right
that
want
to
do
things
without
like
doxing
themselves.
Basically-
and
I
think
in
theory,
we
should
be
supporting
that
as
much
as
possible
yeah
for
this
one
in
particular
like
this
is
like
you
know,
one
of
three
methods
and
sort
of
meant
to
be
a
shortcut.
So
hopefully
we
can
get
at
least
most
of
those
signatures
on
there,
but
yeah.
D
Why
we
want
to
be
pushing
for
trustless
ways
to
do
things
and
other
ways
to
establish
on-chain
identity
and
trust
that
don't
necessarily
involve
tying
things
to
real
world
identity?.
E
B
Related
to
this,
I
guess
just
switching
to
kind
of
another
important
proposal.
This
is
a
proposal
for
the
omen
squad
to
receive
additional
funding,
and
this
would
be
in
conjunction
with
the
launch
of
omen
on
x-die,
and
so
this
would
help
fund
some
initial
markets
for
the
launch
for
the
launch.
I
think
it
is
40
000
yeah
forty
thousand
dollars,
and
this
is
a
the
second
time
the
omen
squad
has
been
funded.
B
I
think
the
first
one
was
around
fifteen
thousand
dollars
and
in
the
post
I
guess
in
that
thread
there's
some
of
the
analysis
from
the
results
of
the
initial
omen
squad,
funding
and
so
yeah.
I
think
this
was
put
in
to
the
proposal
I
think
two
days
ago,
and
there
is
kind
of
some
urgency
here
so
skye
or
geronimo.
I
don't
know
if
you're
have
any
thoughts
on
on
on
this
proposal,.
A
Yeah,
I
think
the
omen
squad
so
there's
a
you
know
the
omen
squad's
this
an
under
entity
of
dx
dao,
that's
been,
you
know,
doing
some
actions
and
and
has
now
reported
back,
and
so
there
is
a
little.
You
know
there's
a
little
trust
embedded
in
like
what
the
omen
squad
that
operates
is
doing,
but
I
think,
like
using
past
performance
and
and
based
on
act.
A
Past
actions
is
what
is
able
to
make,
which
was
why,
like
it
started
as
a
smaller
thing
and
it's
slowly,
building
up
and
like
it's
its
history
and
its
reputation
and
its
performance
as
an
entity
has
to
earn
the
trust
of
of
of
dx
dao
and,
like
eventually
it
becomes
the
actual
omen
guild
that
that
we're
moving
towards
but
yeah.
A
I
think
the
point
of
the
these
funds
is
is
specifically
to
be
all
used
on
markets
for
the
launch
of
x-di
omen
markets,
potentially
a
super
bowl
market
and
potentially
a
few
other
smaller
markets
split
up.
A
H
Like
I
see,
the
omen
squad
is
just
like
a
representation
from
the
oman
community,
so
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
kind
of
building
up
people
who
understand
markets,
people
who
understand
or
like
have
like
gut
feelings
about
which
markets
could
could
be
good,
and
I
think
we
should
do
it
with
like
continuous
competitions
to
reward
people
and
to
get
them
on
board
as
like
a
as
like
a
proper
community
behind
market
creation
and
yeah,
like
even
a
scientific
approach
with
like
reports
about
which
markets
work,
which
don't
work
and
the
omen
squad
is
just
basically
the
designer
of
the
community
like
to
to
execute
on
what
the
community
thinks
should
be
done.
H
Of
course,
most
of
the
stuff
at
some
point
needs
to
be
like.
There
are
emergency
cases
where
the
squad
needs
to
intervene
because
specific
markets
like
we
don't,
I
think,
the
only
like
we
should
even
prevent
those
markets
to
happen
which
are
like
where,
where
the
almost
court
needs
to
intervene
like
oh,
our
end
goal
should
be
that
we
just
do
stuff
for
the
community
in
a
secure
manner
and,
like
you
know,
most
importantly,
in
a
transparent
manner.
H
Right
where,
like
there
are
a
lot
of
people
looking
at
those
markets
to
make
sure
like.
First,
we
make
money
and
second
we're
actually
providing
like
liquidity
to
markets,
and
that's
like
the
most
that's
the
second
most
important
part
that
we
keep
almond
liquids,
especially
on
extra
like
we're,
seeing
gnosis,
there's
a
there's,
a
high
chance
that
gnosis
will
not
continue
doing
it.
So
we
need
to
like
prepare
to
make
sure
that
there
is
a
there
is
a
entity
who
who
will
continue
doing
it.
D
I
actually
think
there
might
be
a
way
to
design
a
more
permissionless
system
that
could
could
do
this
kind
of
thing
like,
like
basically
leverage
treasury
funds
in
the
products
with
like
some
management,
but
where
that
management
is
like
permissionless
and
open
to
the
community
and
the
way
that
they
kind
of
earn
these
privileges
is
through
you
know,
earning
rep
or
past
actions
themselves,
maybe
staking
some
dxd
and
like
in
combination
with
having
some
like
appropriate
constraints
on
what
this
like
relayer
or
like
you
know,
if
you
think
of
it
as
like
a
liquidity
relayer
for
omen,
what
what
it
would
be
able
to
do
like
I'm
picturing,
like
it
only
can
deposit
like
create
markets
to
puzzle,
liquidity,
withdrawal
liquidity.
D
If
it's
limited
to
that
and
there's
like
you,
know
enough
dispute
resolution
time
for
like
the
initial
proposal
of
markets,
I
think
it
could
be
kind
of
fraud
resistant
to
the
point
where
this
could
almost
be
a
permissionless
system.
That's
just
kind
of
like
an
idea
of
where
I
think
we
could
go
with
this.
H
Need
to
like,
we
definitely
need
to
get
away
from
a
multi-stick
or
yeah,
and
that's
I
think,
another
way
we
could
do
it.
The
fact
that,
like
we
have
xdi
the
geek
style
system
on
extra,
it
means
that
presidential
election
markets,
which
which
are
active
for
several
months
they
like
it's,
absolutely
possible
that
the
dx
star
itself
is
pushing
stuff
into
into
the
market
right.
So
at
some
point
we
might
see
that
the
multisig
or
hopefully
just
the
community,
will
prepare
those
markets.
H
I
mean
it
just
needs
to
create
those,
maybe
also
funded
by
by
the
dx,
now
that
we
have
like
guards
or
like
a
proper
woman,
community
who's,
taking
care
of
the
markets,
and
then
the
d
cells,
basically
just
pushing
liquidity
into
it
and
like
with
gelato,
hopefully
going
to
exercise
so
soon.
We
might
even
have
something
like
that.
The
deak
star
is
putting
stuff
into
it
and
then
automatically
gets
the
money
back
with
with
gelato,
and
that's
like,
I
think,
the
next
level
of
the
omen
squad.
B
Yeah
I
like
the
comparison
to
swapper
liquidity.
Obviously
swapper
and
omen
are
completely
different,
but
just
thinking
about
how
we
have
the
the
way
that
geeksdale
is
providing
liquidity
on
swapper
in
a
trussless
way
and
and
how
can
we
mimic
those
same
types
of
things
for
the
omen
squad,
given
that
it's
like
a
million
times
more
complicated
to
provide
liquidity
there?
But
it
does
maybe
provide
like
an
overall
structure
in
for
that.
So,
and
I
think,
just
in
general,
I
think
omen
is
a
product.
B
That's
in
you
know
a
great
place
and
needs
a
lot
of
attention
and
there's
a
huge
opportunity
with
xdi.
Here
I
think
to
attract
some
more
awareness,
since
I
think
that's
really
important,
and
then
I
think
it's
also
important
that
the
omen
squad
is
figuring
out
the
nitty-gritty
of
how
to
provide
liquidity
on
these
markets,
because
this
is
like
truly
like
uncharted
territory,
and
so
that
kind
of
the
results
from
that,
and
especially
being
public
and
transparent.
B
I
think,
can
be
helpful
for
anyone
to
be
able
to
provide
liquidity
on
omen
and
it
could
increase
the
number
of
liquidity
providers
through
that
disclosure.
B
Cool,
I
think
that
was
it
for
the
proposal
roundup.
We
had
a
lot
of
like
interesting
proposals.
I
think
there
were
a
couple
others
that
two
smaller
ones
there
but
yeah,
and
then
I
wanted
to
move
on
to
the
onboarding
guide,
and
this
is
something
that
pulp
has
been
working
on
the
last
couple
weeks.
We've
talked
about
on
this
call,
we've
kind
of
had
some
updates,
and
I
think
the
goal
is
now
to
kind
of
move
towards
finalizing
it
and
then
moving
towards
a
proposal
so
pulp.
Do
you
wanna.
F
Yeah
sure,
thanks
chris,
very
quick,
so
just
based
on
feedback
from
regarding
the
trial,
the
worker
trial
period.
Let's
see,
I
think
I
could
just
show
so
basically,
I
added
a
poll
to
dow
talk
in
order
to
address
whether
we
should
just
keep
pay
at
fifty
percent
during
the
two
week.
F
First,
two
weeks
of
a
new
workers,
time
with
dxdow,
or
should
we
do
more
of
a
pro
rata
pay
structure
where
in
the
second,
basically
through
the
first
two
and
a
half
months,
you're
gonna
have
some
sort
of
pro
rata
pay
structure
either
that
first
full
month
is
at
seventy
percent
and
then
the
second
full
month
is
at
90
percent
or
an
option
that
was
brought
up
today
is
either
just
you
know,
those
second
two
months
or
at
80
percent.
F
So
the
polls
on
on
dow
talk-
I
think
we
have
seven
votes
so
far-
looks
like
most
people
so
far,
there's
four
votes
for
the
80
for
the
following
two
months,
so
yeah
just
go
and
vote
and
I'll
leave
it
open,
for
you
know,
at
least
until
the
end
of
the
week,
and
we
can
kind
of
wrap
up
that
issue
and
then
the
other
thing
that
in
the
worker
guidelines
that
there's
just
something
quickly
to
bring
up
is
just
worker
holidays,
just
basic
research
that
I
did.
F
I
think
we
I
saw
basically
that
most
nations
that's
includes
china,
southeast
asia,
western
nations.
They
all
have
somewhere
between,
like
10
to
20
national
holidays,
that
they
have
for
different
reasons
in
each
given
country.
So
I
think
five
might
have
been
a
little
bit
low
for
us,
and
so
the
idea
is
maybe
do
something
more
like
10
keenan
also
suggested
12
just
so
it's
really
simple.
It's
just
you
know
at
least
once
a
month
someone
has
a
kind
of
a
holiday
they
can
take
for
whatever
religious
national
personal
reason.
F
That
is,
and
that's
that's
pretty
much
it
as
far
as
major
changes
to
the
onboarding
guide
yeah.
We
can
talk
about
it
or,
if
everyone's
comfortable
with
that,
we
can
just
kind
of
go
forward
with
once
the
polls
done.
I
would
do
an
alchemy
proposal
for
ratifying
the
guide.
A
Martin
had
raised
a
point
this
morning
about,
like
someone
not
like
reading
anything
about
dxdow
onboarding
guide
before
having
a
call
with
a
team
member
of
dx
dao,
which
is
bad.
I
guess
once
this
is
out
there
more
out
like
out
front
it'll,
be
easier
for
people
to
do,
but
I
agree
like
almost
like
I,
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
used
like
the
quiz
thing
on
git
coin
grants.
There's
like
these.
A
I
don't
know
like
we
have
to
like
read
something
about
maker
and
then
there's
an
actual
like
timed
quiz.
It
would
be
cool
to
like
either
add
that
to
git
coin
and
like
force
people
to
do
it
or
make
our
own
quiz
like
based
on
the
based
on
the
guidelines
and
stuff.
F
Right,
luckily,
it's
all
there,
hopefully
once
we
have
it
so
keenan
and
I
are
also
working
on
getting
he's
doing.
You
know
everything.
That's
regarding
the
documentation
book,
so
that's
gonna,
be
another
location
for
all
this
information,
but
yeah,
something
that
at
least
gets
like
the
nitty
gritty
points
in
a
quick
quiz
could
be
could
be
interesting.
Yeah.
H
I
think
that
is
an
amazing
idea
like
it's.
It
will
filter
out
99
of
the
scale.
F
F
Cool,
so
maybe
we
we,
I
can
work
on
something
regarding
that,
oh
and
then
one
other
thing.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
something
that
was
discussed
at
the
last
meeting
and
I
we're
doing
it
for
dxd
payments.
It
was
discussed,
you
know,
for
the
vesting
contract
in
the
future,
because
the
bonding
curve
will
be
halted
right
once
we
figure
out
the
technical
aspects
of
that
we're
doing
fair
market
value
of
dxd
going
forward.
Is
that.
B
F
B
D
Yeah,
I
don't
think
it's
so
much
options
at
this
point
like
I
think
we
want
to
still
respect
the
curve
mint
price
but
like
using
it
and
eath
is
kind
of
getting
out
of
hand
right
like
the
east
price
going
up.
So
I
think
we
need
to
like
make
sure
it's
people
understand
to
nominate
it
in
dollars
right.
So
we
just
use
the
the
highest
dollar
price
that
txt
has
been
sold
from
the
curve
perfect.
F
Cool,
so
that's
it
so
yeah,
just
everyone
I'll
put
the
link
here
regarding
the
poll
it'll
be
open
until
friday.
B
Cool
great
work
and
then
sky.
I
just
wanted
to
like
touch
briefly
on,
like
the
dmm
governance.
I
know
that
this
was
discussed
in
the
tech
on
the
developer
call
yesterday
and
I
think,
like
the
most
of
the
ideas,
are
we
need
to
think
of
like
a
technical
solution,
but
I
think
it's
a
yeah.
It's
a
good
opportunity
for
us
to
kind
of
maybe
be
able
to
expand
some
of
these
capabilities
and
to
participate
in
dmm
governance.
A
A
One
is
probably
some
way
to
do
a
two-day
voting
period
for
either
rep
holders
or
for
dxd
holders
or
for
both,
so
that
could
be
on
snapshot
that
could
be
on
xdxdow
with
a
new,
shorter
voting
mechanism
or
dx
vote
app,
which
aguso
has
been
building
that
so
something
within
like
a
two
or
three
day
time
frame
and
then
all
the
multi-stick,
then
there'd
be
a
multisig
which
has
the
delegation
from
the
dow
of
the
actual
like
say,
dmg
tokens,
and
then
all
the
multisig
would
do
is
execute
the
voice
of
the
rep
slash
dxd
holders.
A
So
I
think
I
think
that
will
work
and
we
it
will
be
in
dmm-
is
excited
about
that
idea.
We
just
need
the
multi
call
to
be
able
to
do
the
delegation.
A
B
Cool
yeah
and
I
think
once
like
the
delegation
gets
figured
out
like
we
don't
I
don't
think
we
need
to.
We
can
figure
out
how
exactly
the
decisions
are.
The
governance
decisions
are
decided,
but
I
think
that's
you
know
we
can
be
flexible
with
that,
because
it
might
be
that
the
people
that
are
studying
dmm
the
most
are
following
that
the
most
in
the
community
should
be
kind
of
like
leading
the
way
there.
But
I
think
the
first
key
is
to
delegate
and
start
participating
in
in
some.
B
B
Cool
I
wanted
just
to
touch
on
like
one
other
point
in
terms
of
like
governance,
one
point
x,
and
only
because
I
just
we
had
a
couple
different
things
like
going
on
and
it's
just
as
if
we
talk
about
rep
distribution
and
how
that's
getting
costly
people
aren't
trying
to
people
aren't
maybe
claiming
rep
because
of
gas
costs,
and
I
just
think
broadly,
if
you
look
at
obviously
proposals,
there's
been
a
hesitancy
to
to
vote
because
voting
is
so
expensive.
B
And
so
I
guess
we
have
like
two
con
and
really
maybe
three
concurrent
ways
of
like
working
on
that.
And
so
one
is
the
alchemy
improvements
that
I
think
ezra
had
posted
about,
and
they
were
basically
a
snapshot
like
development
and
then
two
is
a
gusto's
dx
vote
dap,
which
will
provide
some.
B
I
think
scalability
improvements
there
and
I
guess
three
would
kind
of
be
x,
die
itself
and
maybe
playing
with
that
a
little
bit
more
for
like
signal
proposals,
or,
I
think
also
like
reimbursements
right
if
we're
doing
smaller
amounts
there.
B
So
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
check
in
and
see
if
there's
anything
I
missed
there
or
how
people
are
thinking
about,
like
the
the
the
short-term
ability
to
kind
of
govern
and
and
how
we
can
like
try
to
manage
our
our
gas
costs
there
or
if
there's
any
kind
of
thoughts
on
on
the
three
different,
I
guess
concurrent
tracks.
We
have
the
dow
stack
snapshot
thing:
augusto's,
dx,
vote,
dap
or
x.
B
H
Yeah,
I
see
a
strong
use
case
with
using
x
die.
I
think
the
fact
that
there
is
nothing
going
on
right
now
means
like
no
one
cares,
but
in
the
upcoming
weeks
I
think
x
day
will
be
more
and
more
important
and
I
think
there
needs
they're,
like
very
small
barriers,
which
are
kind
of
huge.
Like
one
example
is
that
we
have
eight
dx
dollars
on
x
die.
H
It
sounds
like
a
small
thing,
but
no
one
wants
to
check
all
of
them
to
check
what
is
the
right
one
and
that
needs
to
be
fixed
like
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
just
share
a
link
or
go
to
a
link,
and
then
they
are
on
exile
and
can
do
things
and
after
treasury
diversification,
I
guess
the
ecstatic
base
will
have
more
money,
which
means
there
will
be
more
economy
on
next
time
on
the
exile
base,
and
then
people
get
used
to
making
proposals
on
axiory
and
maybe
even
getting
paid
on
xa,
because
swapper
will
be
your
next
die
hormone
will
be
on
x,
die
yeah.
H
We
are
transitioning
slowly
with
a
small
portion
of
the
funds,
a
very
small
portion
at
the
beginning,
because
xd
went
offline
a
few
weeks
ago.
But
there's
like
a
small,
very
slow
process
in
in
extra.
A
Direction
yeah,
I
I
my
feeling
is,
I
agree
with
drama
that
x
x,
die
is
being
under
under
used
totally
part
of
the
issue.
Is
that
well
pretty
soon
we're
going
to
have
an
a
dx
dow
on
arbitrarium
2
right
so
like
then
we
have
another
one
but
like
we're
not
even
leveraging
the
xdi
one.
Yet
we
should
and
we
will
as
omen
launches
and
swapper
is
on
there
as
well.
A
But
if
we
had
like
a
couple
hundred
thousand
x
die
on
on
on
xdxdow,
like
yeah
worker
proposals
could
be
done
on
there,
like
once
you
start
using
and
voting
and
submitting
proposals
on
xdi
you
realize
like.
If
I
don't
know
most
people
here
like
participating
in
governance
once
you
do
it
on
x,
die
and
it's
cheap,
fast
and
fun.
It's
like
so
much
better
and
more
pleasant
than
doing
it
on
mainnet.
A
That,
like
I
think,
will
that
will
like
participation,
could
go
up
drastically
and
I've
seen
the
same
thing
with
molok
dials,
because
there
are
a
bunch
of
molok
dials
on
mainnet,
and
then
there
are
a
bunch
of
molecules
on
xdi
and
it's
like
so
much
better
on
xdi,
it's
just
more
fun
and
you
get
to
vote
you
get
to
you
get
to
participate,
you
get
to
request
money.
We
just
need
to
like
we're
kind
of
making.
A
The
assumption
already
that
x,
dx
dow
on
x,
die
is
the
voice
of
of
dx
dao
like
we've,
never
ratified
it,
which
we
can
do
on
main
net.
I
guess
maybe
we
should
ratify
it
on
x,
die
but
like
it
is
the
same
rep
holders,
so
it
is
of.
It
is
basically
the
same
voice,
but
it's
not
official.
We
have
never
made
it
official,
but
as
we
start
using
it
more
and
more,
I
think
it
kind
of
just
becomes
more
and
more
official
it
doesn't.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
even
like
ratified.
D
B
B
I
know
the
omen,
I
think,
there's
a
curation
batch
there,
so
yeah
I
mean
it
takes
a
while
to
kind
of
like
build
legitimacy
and
build
like
processes,
but
I
agree
that,
like
xdi
is
an
underutilized
resource,
but
I
think
that
we
are
like
slowly
getting
there
and
formulating
that.
I
think
both
with
omen,
the
multicall
scheme
being
tested
on
that,
and
then
I
also
think,
like
the
treasury
diversification
will
will
help
in
that
this
way
so
yeah.
I
think
we
should
be
on
the
lookout
for
that
going
forward.
A
A
It
would
be
nice
to
get
some
more
money
into
xdx.
Now,
like
maybe
a
hundred
thousand
or
something
like
just
the
more
money.
That's
there,
the
more
it
can
be
used.
The
more
people
can
do
proposals
there.
The
more
people
can
do
bounties,
it
probably
needs
a
little
more
money,
and
then
people
just
would
pay
more
attention.
If
it
has
more
money
too,.
H
Yeah,
I
think
the
reason
why
we're
kind
of
forced
to
use
this
very
expensive,
stupid
mainnet
is
because
the
money
is
there
right
and
if
we
are
moving
the
money
to
extire,
of
course
not
a
lot
like
not
half
a
million,
but
at
least
like
two
I
don't
know
100k
is
totally
fine.
H
A
A
Someone
could
put
in
a
fake
proposal,
or
I
mean
a
real
proposal
and
and
drain
the
money
from
x.
The
nine
thousand
dollars
from
x,
dx,
dow
and
like
it
might
not
be
caught,
because
not
many
people
are
looking
at
it,
it
probably
wouldn't
be,
it
probably
would
be
caught.
But
if
there's
a
hundred
thousand
or
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
there
there's
less
of
a
chance
that
someone
could
attack
that
dow.
Actually
there's.
F
F
You
know
not
just
new
people
but
growing
the
community,
and
we
need
to
you
know
eventually
you
know
be
able
to
say
this
is
what
we're
using
and
everybody
go
here
and
while
we
can
have
like
a
preparation
phase,
I
think
it
could
be
helpful
to
really
like
plan
out
how
we're
doing
this,
and
you
know,
make
it
somewhat
of
a
real
transition,
because
it
just
causes
more
confusion.
F
You
know
just
as
an
example
like
doing
the
documentation
book
with
with
keenan.
We
have
so
many
different
avenues
that
we're
trying,
which
is
good.
That's
you
know
we
need
to
try
new
things
and
be
innovative,
and
you
know
see
what
works
and
doesn't
work
and
be
flexible,
but
at
the
same
time,
in
order
to
give
you
know
real
validity
to
something
we
need
to
all.
You
know
decide
as
a
group
like
we're
going
to
do
this.
D
I'm
definitely
in
favor
of
like
some
kind
of
authorization
or
like
yeah
designation
proposal
from
mainnet,
because
until
like
the
actual
data
says
it's
like
a
sub-dial
or
whatever
base
the
next
day
like
it's
yeah.
It's
not.