►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2021-03-17]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
d
style
governance,
discussion
for
wednesday
march
17th
2021
happy
st
patrick's
day
to
everyone,
starting
on
the
proposal.
Roundup
again,
so
we
have
two
different
bases
now
so
going
through
the
main
net
first
and
then
looking
at
the
x
dive.
So
we've
seen
a
big
decline
in
the
number
of
main
net
proposals,
that's
from
gas
costs
and
also
because
we've
been
switching
so
many
of
the
proposals
to
xdi.
There
is
right
now
one
treasury
diversification
proposal.
B
B
I
think
it
was
15
000
gen
so
that
we
can
have
holographic
consensus
run
and
operate
there,
and
then
this
is
a
proposal
to
just
reimburse
that
using
the
member
balancer
format
and
then
there
is
a
proposal
to
deposit
250
eth
into
swapper
on
x,
die,
and
I
think
this
is
the
you
know:
we've
been
doing
a
lot
of
different
swapper
liquidity
proposals
and
moving
to
xti
proposals.
I
think
this
is
like
the
first
one.
B
That's
not
necessarily
a
testing,
but
a
really
more
like
a
business
or
strategic
move,
because
this
250
eath
would
be
divided
across
four
pairs
before
being
bridged
over
2x
die
and
then
deposited
on
swapper
liquidity
in
india
swapper
on
xdi.
So
those
are
the
three
main
ones
right
now.
On
mainnet,
there
was
also
like
a
rep
boost
at
the
bottom
that
I
think
sky
was
reaching
out
and
there's
another
payment
that
I
need
to
that.
B
I
guess
there's
not
a
omen
really.
Is
there
omen
release
proposal
on
the
multi
call?
Actually
there
is
one
still
no
one
voted
on
it,
I'm
just
looking
at
that
now
right.
B
I
forget
because
that's
in
the
multi-call,
but
it's
doing
it's
an
ens
update
right
right.
The.
D
In
the
multicore
now
is
because
we
batch
two
actions
on
chain
which
means
updating
the
omen
main
domain
and
the
subdomain
xdy.org
at
once.
B
Yeah-
and
that
is
it,
saves
money,
but
it
does.
It
is
a
little
bit
longer
exactly
yeah,
but
we
should.
I
should
have
included
that
on
the
agenda,
so
that's
something
to
vote
on
too
yeah,
and
then
I
expect
probably
today
two
more
proposals
coming
probably
from
maine
that
this
week
one
will
be
another
treasury
diversification
proposal,
just
kind
of
continually
doing
those,
and
then
two
will
be
another
deposit
of
die
on
x
die
base
just
as
a
reimbursement
or
not
a
reimbursement.
B
I
guess
a
refunding
or
topping
off
after
some
of
the
ex
die
on
there
has
been
withdrawn
by
workers
because
they're
getting
paid
there
now,
a
lot
of
them
look
at
we've,
been
moving
to
exeter
has
been
specific
for
swapper,
so
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
that
liquidity.
We
could
have
some
funds
there
for
swapper,
but
also
make
sure
we
have
enough
dye
or
xdi
to
do
worker
payments
on
xda.
So
those
two
proposals
should
be
coming
this
week
on
on
mainnet.
E
Yeah
and
enter
treasury
diversification.
I
think
it
might
make
sense
to
start
thinking
about
what
the
next
authorization
proposal
should
be
like.
I
would
personally,
I
think
we
should
continue
to
acquire
stable
coins
and
yeah
increase
the
percentage
of
the
treasury.
That's
in
stable
assets.
B
Yeah,
I
agree
so
I
think
we'll
probably
I
mean
at
the
minimum
we'd
be
on
this
same
steady
pattern,
for
I
think
another
like
two
little
less
than
two
weeks
but
yeah.
We
should
figure
out
what
what
we
want
there
and
I
think,
there's
diversification
there's
also
like
what
would
we
be
doing
with
that?
B
Do
we
need
it
for
strategic
reasons
like
we
want
to
swap
our
right,
we're
using
for
that
or
where
are
we
going
to
put
it,
because
I
think
now
that
we
have
some
stable
coins
in
the
treasury,
we
should
be
thinking
about
like
getting
a
yield
on
those
or
exactly
how
they'll
they'll
fit.
So
I
think
both
of
those
are
part
of
that.
F
B
Yeah
and
so
just
for
just
to
set
the
table,
so
the
original
treasury
diversification
proposal
was
three
million
dollars
spread
across
four
different.
B
Stable
coins
die
usdc,
usdt
and
susd,
the
thinking
being
just
to
diversify
across
many
stable
coins
as
possible,
and
also
because
those
would
probably
be
used
for
a
swapper
liquidity
pool,
but
I
think
there's
been
some
legitimate
kind
of
pushback
on
both
susd
and
usdt
as
like
whether
we
really
need
those
as
part
of
like
the
portfolio,
especially
when
we
don't
have
as
a
specific
need
like
we're
going
after
like
this
pool,
we
know
it
for
right
now.
B
I
think
we
should
definitely
revisit
this
going
forward,
like
once,
we've
kind
of
concluded
this
round.
I
think
the
question
is:
should
we
still
do
proposals
on
diversifying
into
susd
and
usdt
until
we
reach
the
3
million
number
that
we
originally
set
out,
which
would
mean,
I
think,
about
another
400,
000
susd
and
another
400
000,
or
do
we
just
want
to
like
start
accumulating
the
other
stable
coins
just.
F
G
Martin
one
thing
on
that
like:
if
we
have
what
is
it
700
000
of
usdt,
like
there's
a
number
of
things,
we
can
do
that
if
people
don't
want
to
get
paid
in
usdt,
that's
fine,
we
can
either
have
a
swapper
pool.
We
could
put
usdt
into
compound.
We
could
put
usdt
into
y
urn
like
there's
a
lot
of
things
you
can
do
with
actual
usdt,
so
it
doesn't
hurt
to
have
some
usdt.
G
Yeah,
so
I
think,
let's
stick
with
the
plan
that
we
have,
like
the
three
million
get
those
ratios
figure
out.
What
we
want
to
do
with
them
just
hold
them,
put
them
to
work
or
use
them
for
swapper
pools
and
then
and
then,
at
the
same
time,
in
the
next
diversification
proposal,
which
I
have
like
a
short
draft
of
and
we're
just
doing
that
in
tandem
with
tracking
like
dave
is
dave,
is
working
on,
like
the
actual
tracking
of
all
of
the
money
movements
that
dx
dow
has
done
so
far.
G
Once
we
have
those
two
things
and
you
have
a
good
summary,
it
will
help
determine
what
how
to
make
the
next
treasury
diversification
proposal,
but
like
yeah,
it
doesn't
it's
not
like
if
tether.
If
something
happens,
to
tether,
like
that's,
going
to
be
a
major
problem
in
general,
but
like
something
could
happen
to
die
too
like
so,
we
don't
want
to
hold
all
die
because
if
something
happens
to
the
maker
system,
you
want
the
other
three
as
well
right.
G
So
and
if
something
happens
to
synthetics
like
so,
it
makes
sense
to
have
four
in
some
manner.
But
if
we're
gonna
like
focus
on
pools
and
stuff,
and
no
one
cares
about
susd
in
swapper,
then
that
then
we're
not
going
to
need
a
lot
of
s
usdc
to
put
in
swapper
right,
but
with
s
usdc,
what
you
can
do
is
you
can
go
to
synthetics
and
you
can
turn
it
into
swbtc
for
free.
B
Many
s's
and
c's,
I
think
it's
susd
to
sbtc.
Isn't
that
what
I
said
I
ever
think
anyway,
yeah
I
mean
so
what
do
people
think?
I
think
that's
kind
of
like
keep
on
the
same
plan
and
we
do
have
enough
like
we
have
died
in
usdc
or
what
people
are
requesting
payments
in
and
if
you
look
on
like
xdi,
that's
we
have
about
270
000,
die
on
xdi
and
then
about
1.5
million
usdc
and
die
on
mainnet.
B
B
B
And
then
looking
at
xdi
base,
there
are
rep
boost
for
venky
and
snoofkin
sufficient's
been
active
in
the
discord
and
that's
matching
earlier
ones.
There
are
worker
proposals,
there
are
liquidity,
deposit
proposals
for
swapper
on
xdi,
and
then
there
is
the
add
tokens
to
the
swapper
list
before
I
want
to
go
with
the
red
boost
in
a
second
and
the
working
proposals
in
a
second,
but
I
just
wanted
to
go
through
the
swapper
liquidity
proposals
first
and
the
token
proposals
first
to
see.
B
If
there's
any
questions
there,
because
john
actually
there's
a
proposal
now
ready
to
be
executed,
and
I
don't,
I
wasn't
sure
what
the
order
we
need
to
go
to
in
terms
of
that
swapper
testing.
I
think
if
you
look
right
now
in
the
oh
yeah
in
the
funding
voting
power,
there
is
the
depositing
funds
in
swapper
liquidity,
relayer
2
for
32k
die
and
20
eth.
That's
about
that
could
go
through
so
should
yeah.
E
Yeah
yeah
I
mean,
and
so
the
general
plan
here
was
to
start
small
with
a
test
deposit
and
do
a
withdrawal,
so
there's
a
two
weth
or
x
weft
and
about
I
think,
four
thousand
thirty
six
hundred
wraps
x-tie,
that's
already
been
deposited
into
the
relayer
and
also
what
recently
passed
was
the
order
to
deposit
that
into
swapper,
and
I
actually
just
executed
that
one
and
so
after
this
call
was
actually
going
to
do
the
oracle
updates
and
see
you
know,
get
that
actually
into
swapper.
E
So
then,
like
the
general
plan
here
was
to
like
start
with
that
test,
see
that
we
can
actually
pull
it
out
and
then
ramp
up
and
to
get
the
full
75
wealth
and
equivalent
amount
of
x
die
into
swapper
right.
So
there's
three
steps.
Oh
sorry,
there's
like
a
thunderstorm
coming
on
like
carrying
the
rain
on
the
window,
but
like
yeah,
there's
three
steps,
so
the
the
second
one
is
that
32
000
x
die
and
tony
west
that
just
passed.
E
So
there
was
a
little
wrinkle
in
this
plan,
though,
when
we
were
doing
the
multi-sig
testing
over
the
weekend.
We
realized
that
you
actually
need
to
have
the
owner
of
the
relayer
call
the
like
order
execution
when
withdrawing
funds
like
this
is
actually
just
a
public
function
that
can
be
called
when
depositing
funds,
but
when
withdrawing
it
needs
to
be
the
owner,
and
that
was
a
slight
oversight
in
our
plans.
So
there
is
a
proposal.
E
Like
yeah
houston
weather,
so
there
is
a
one
that
is
called
execute
test,
unpool
liquidity
order.
That's
got
two
about
two
days
left
to
pass
in
the
gerex
scheme.
That
is
the
one
we
need
to
actually
complete
the
withdrawal
right.
So
I
think
if
we
wanted
to
be
extra
safe,
you
wouldn't
actually
pull
the
trigger
on
that
funding,
one
for
the
20
weather,
but
I
don't
I
mean
I
don't
have
any
reason
to
think
that
there'd
be
a
problem.
E
Things
went
well,
I
made
that
things
went
well
in
testing
and
rank
b,
etc.
So
I
think
it's
to
actually
like
follow
that
step
plan.
We
could
like
hold
off
on
this
one.
You
know.
Personally,
I
don't
think
it's
the
the
end
of
the
world.
If
we
try
to
do
that,
I
think
it
should
be
fun
but
and
obviously
like
anyone
could
actually
pull
that.
So.
E
I
am
also
in
the
middle
of
writing
a
guide
on
how
to
do
these
proposals,
and
so
I
will
be
sharing
that,
probably
on
dow
talk,
hopefully
today,
so
that,
basically,
anybody
could
yeah
feel
comfortable
making
these
kinds
of
differences.
B
Yeah
there's
something
going
on
yeah
and
so
then
that
last
I'm
just
looking
at
the
the
third
relayer
proposal
that
it
will
go
through
in
three
days
and
20
hours.
That's
the
53,
weft
and
75
000
x
die
once
that
goes
through.
That
will
stay
in
swapper,
presumably
right.
Well,.
E
Proposal,
it's
getting
really
crazy
and
get
it
out
later,
but
there's
like
I
don't
think,
there's
any
really
reason
to
want
it
to
stay
in
the
swamper
right.
B
Right
so
the
last
the
unpool
is
like
the
last
test
and
then
everything
else
is
like
this
is
going
to
just
stay
as
it
is
and
then
so
we'll
hopefully
get
that
this
week
right.
So
that's
like
a
weth
x,
dive
pool
that
is
owned
by
xdx
tao
and
like
we
feel
good
all
about
that.
Hopefully,
at
the
end
of
this
week
and
then
going
back
to
the
mainnet
proposals.
B
We
have
that
250
each
proposal
to
fund
additional
liquidity
on
swapper
and
that's
the
one
that
will
be
broken
down
across
four
different
pairs,
die
usdc,
a
dpi
eth
and
then
I
think
an
eth
wbtc
pool.
So
then
we'll
have
five
total
pools
that
will
be
provide,
will
be
owned
and
providing
liquidity
by
xdxdow
and
then
next
week.
B
Presumably
we'll
go
through
the
same
process
of
having
to
deposit
using
two
different
proposals
per
pair
to
initiate
new
liquidity
on
on
swapper
on
next
time,
and
so
I
mean
this
is
kind
of
like
a
bit
of
a
moving
game,
because
now
what
we
need
to
be
thinking
about
now
is
like
what
is
the
next
batch
of
liquidity
that
we
want
in
swapper
on
xdi
or
mainnet
and
like
how
do
we
kind
of
start
thinking
about
that
now?
B
G
Yeah,
that's
why
I
have
like
building
up
coming
up
with
a
comfort
level
for
what
we're
totally
comfort
with
comfortable
with
on
x,
die
because
it
is
a
it
is
a
risk
right
and
like
just
getting
the
money
there
like
and
assuming
that
we
know
we're
gonna
want
to
have
it
there.
Let's,
like
even
in
big
chunks
like
in
theory,
you
could
do
a
million
dollars
at
a
time
right
and
just
getting
the
assets
on
to
excite,
because
otherwise
it's
gonna
be.
G
It's
gonna,
make
the
process
twice
over
twice
as
long
when
we
want
to
actually
act
on
x,
die
so
like
getting
getting
assets
over.
There
is
key,
I
think,
which
we
are
planning
to
do
right,
we're
doing
it
slowly.
G
Yeah,
oh
so
more
and
more
like
so
artis
is
doing
the
the
the
token
offering
on
gnosis
right
that
martin
had
shared
on
like
gnosis.
First
auction
will
be
artist
blockchain
token,
which
is
minerva
wallet
house
just
did
theirs
on
xdi,
so
the
the
more
and
more
tokens
are
realizing.
It
sucks
on
mainnet,
okay,
we're
not
like
some
giant
major
d5
project:
let's
do
our
sales.
Let's
do
our
liquidity,
like
our
dowels
on
x-die.
G
They
all
need
pools
and
so
they're
pro
at
this
point,
they're
using
honey
swap
and
they're
planning
to
use
honey
swap,
but
we
can
take
that
over,
especially
if
we
have
the
bridge
to
mainnet
because
honey
the
swap
doesn't
have
that.
So
these
tokens
are
going
to
be
their
their
mainnet
tokens,
which
will
be
mainly
used
on
xdi.
So
you
need
the
pools,
a
swapper
pool
and
xdi,
but
then
with
the
ability
to
move
to
mainnet
if,
if
community
needs,
so
I
think
swapper
is
well
positioned
for
that
and
it
will
be
super
cool.
E
I
think
another
another
like
aspect
of
this
is
like
winning
the
pools
like
being
the
best
pool
to
trade
on
in
the
in
a
specific
chain.
Right
so
like,
I
think
what
we've
done
on
these
like
product
strategy
calls
is
like
look
at
what's
happening,
on
honey
swap
and
now
like
bow
swap,
is
another
one,
so
kind
of
trying
to
kind
of
keep
an
eye
on
the
market
there
and
it
yeah.
It
becomes
this
biz
dev
effort,
basically
right,
how
do
we
strategically
place
liquidity?
How
do
we
make
the
right
partnerships
to
attract
liquidity.
B
Cool
yeah
and
it's
john
said:
well
probably
the
the
product
strategy,
we'll
talk
a
bit
more
about
next,
the
next
steps
and
kind
of
where
the
pairs
will
be
so
get
a
look
out
there.
Any
ideas
bring
them
there.
Next
just
wanted
to
go
over
the
worker
proposals.
So
there's
one
for
level
k
that
has
already
been
that
is
in
the
queue
I
think
is,
is
slated
to
pass,
and
then
there
was
one
for
a
gusto
that
had
been
boosted.
B
I
think
it
had
been
downstate,
and
so
I
know
there
was
a
discussion
in
the
key
base
and
I
wasn't
sure
if
there
was
any
resolution
or
a
way
to
move
forward.
I
guess
a
gusto
is
just,
I
think,
rejoined
the
call
he
was
on
the
beginning,
so
anything
else
in
terms
of
moving
forward.
I
think
that
the
discussion
was
that
there
were
two
proposals
kind
of
put
together
and
then
some
additional
discussions
on
the
augusto's
time
over
over
the
first
two
months
of
that
worker
scope.
E
Right,
I
downstaked
it
so
like
and
yeah
and
for
the
record
so
there's
a
augusto
put
a
post
on
to
dow
talk.
I
don't
know
if
he
wants
to
speak
to
that,
but
I
also
had
responded
to
dow
talk.
I
think
it
was
yesterday
or
the
day
before
and
even
prior
to
that
response,
I
had
ping
to
gusto
just
to
let
him
know
what
my
thoughts
were
on
that
proposal.
So
when
I
saw
that
it
was
upstate
this
morning
I
downstaked
it
to
kind
of
reflect
that.
B
H
Yeah
awesome,
awesome,
yeah,
I'm
having
bad
connection
here.
There
is
a
big
sum,
so
I'm
using
my
mobile
data
regarding
the
the
joint
proposal
about
the
the
payout
of
the
last
worker
period
and
creating
the
the
next
responsibilities
and
goal
for
the
for
the
other
working
period.
I
did
that
because
that's
that's
how
I
did
the
last
time
on
on
maintenance
and
yes,
I
agree
that
I
should
have
made
two
proposals
different.
H
I
I
didn't
realize
when
I
was
creating
it,
but
yeah
you're,
right,
john,
it's
it's
super
cheap,
so
I'm
going
to
be
separating
it
in
in
two
proposals,
but
the
proposals
are
are
are
not
changing,
I'm
I'm
not
going
to
change
them,
and
here
it
might.
H
How
is
a
huge
misunderstanding
of
how
are
we
if
we
are
going
to
measure
other
workers,
other
workers,
proposals
or
goals,
and
how
are
we
going
to
do
it?
Because
the
way
I
do
it
is
that
I
set
some
goals.
I
try
to
accomplish
the
goals,
that's
it.
H
If
I
do
it,
if
I
manage
to
accomplish
them,
I
get
paid,
but
now
seems
that
is.
That
is
not
enough
for
for
other
workers
like
john
geronimo
who
are
concerned,
and
I
don't
share
them
and
also
besides
that,
if
seems
like,
if
I
I
feel
like,
if
I
don't
agree
with
where
I
should
work
with
hero
and
john,
I
cannot
be
working
for
the
exile
like
I
feel
like
they
are
pushing
me
on.
H
What
should
I
be
working
on
on
what
they
feel
that
is
most
useful
for
the
exile
and
they
have
the
power
even
to
it,
because
both
of
them
they
share,
I
think
they
they
should
have
like
10
percent
reputation,
which,
even
though
I
think
they
are
not
going
to
to
execute
it
and
and
to
use
it.
This
is
even
this
proved
my
concern
that
I
started
working
here
to
work
on
things
that
I
wanted
to
work
on,
that
I
feel
that
are
useful
for
the
excel
like
txbot.
H
That
is
where
I
want
to
work
the
most
and
to
work
with
other
projects
like
this
on
mesa
like
play
with
new
swapper
features
using
dx
volt
like
we
did
test
the
dxe
and
impulse
on
on
rink
by
using
the
explode,
create
the
next
governance
platform
for
us,
but
seems
that
that
is
not
our
priority
anymore
and,
for
example,
it's
like.
H
Oh,
my
gill,
and
I
should
be
working
pure
and
only
on
omega,
where
the
only
thing
I
think
I
have
to
do
is
to
write
the
smart
contract
for
the
human
gear
and
I'm
waiting
for
the
requirements
from
paul
pankero,
and
I
don't
doubt
that
I
commit
myself
to
buy
the
contracts
on
that.
Even
though
that's
team
that
is
not
enough.
H
I
haven't
been
working
enough
on
the
past
two
months,
even
though
I
accomplished
my
past
goals
so
yeah
I
will
be,
it
would
be
awesome
to
hear
what
other
workers
think
because
seems
like
everyone
is
like.
There
is
a
big
silence
in
the
room
where
they
are
the
only
ones
talking
for.
E
Well,
let
just
let
me
just
follow
up
on
one
thing.
You
said
here
so
that
you
accomplish
your
goals,
because
I'm
looking
at
your
proposal
that
I
voted
for,
I
remember
there.
You
know
some
people
were
criticizing.
You
and
I
defended
you
in
december.
I
defended
you
against
dao
stack.
I
defended
you
against
others
who
thought
your
proposal
was
a
bad
idea
right
and
your
goals
were
one
dx
vote
dap
on
official
release,
honoring.
E
I
think
that
it
has
been
done,
but
who
here
has
actually
used
it
or
even
looked
at
it
to
the
dx
trust,
dap
version.
0.3.0
official
release
rank
be
a
minute.
We
are
not
using
that
on
mainnet.
I'm
not
really
sure
why
it's
even
needed
to
be
honest,
dx
vote
and
dx
trust,
continuous
integration
problem.
So
I
yeah
again
that's
ties
into
the
vote
and
trusts
that
are
not
being
used
yet
and
yeah.
E
The
final
thing
is
like
the
dxd
guild,
and
I
know-
and
I
will
acknowledge
that
you
did
do
some
work
on
the
monitoring
tools,
and
that
is
valuable,
but
I
mean
that
does
not
account
for
the
time.
That's
missing.
D
Right,
like
there
are
two
things:
first,
the
promised
work
like
the
question
is:
has
acoustic
delivered
the
promised
work,
and
especially
like
did
you
commit
the
60
full-time
work
and
that's
something
everyone
here
in
this
call
should
evaluate
themselves
right.
D
This
is
how
I
do
it,
and
this
is
how
john
did
it
and
everyone
has
their
right
to
vote
and
should
vote
accordingly
and
the
the
second
question
is
like
how
how
does
the?
D
How
does
the
collective
deal
with
like,
like
very
very
external
workers,
like
augusto,
who
doesn't
have
a
working
group
like
I
do
have
with
the
omen
guild,
where
we
do
checks
ourselves
and
like
constantly
know
that,
like
basically,
everyone
is
working
and
I'm
like
after
someone
did
the
work,
I'm
like
totally
sure
that
they
definitely
did
the
work,
because
I'm
constantly
working
with
them.
But
how
do?
G
G
When
really
in
this
scenario,
it
seems
more
like
a
pro
like
a
specific
project
such
as
you
know,
we
hired
a
couple
external
dev
shops
to
like
do
a
set
project
for
us
and,
like
the
one
with
block
rockets,
is
quite
slow,
they're
working
on
it,
they're,
theoretically,
keeping
track
of
hours
and
that's
kind
of
how
they'll
charge
I
mean
they
have
a
pre-agreed
rough
idea
of
price
and
how
many
hours
it
will
take.
G
But
it's
not
a
like
it's
a
separate
project
task
when
it's
not
a
full-time
worker,
so
they're
not
getting
paid
in
a
similar
manner
as
full-time
worker.
They
may
be.
You
know
that
we
have
a
designer
who
is
getting
a
pretty
is
getting
paid
his
an
external
designer
who's,
getting
paid
his
his
design
compensation
for
like
a
month
of
design,
work
which
is
not
which
is
outside
of
the
full-time
worker.
G
Like
so
there's
no
the
guy's
not
earning
rep,
the
guy
guys
he's
he's
working
outside
of
the
normal
structures
that
we've
laid
out
and
what's
interesting,
is
there's
lots
of
other
dows
that
are
actually
using
the
structure
that
dx
dow
created,
like
yam,
like
people
that
work
for
a
yam
and
and
sushi
swap
like
have
based
their
salaries,
basically
off
of
like
what
dx
dao
has
formally
put
like
a
structure
out
around
workers,
but
at
the
same
time
there
are
other
people
that
that
are
not
going
to
fit
into
that
structure.
G
So
it's
I
don't
know
the
answer.
It's
an
open
question,
but
in
this
scenario
it
seems
like
a
gusto
for
this
last
two
months
is
not
islet
is
not
fitting
into
the
normal
full-time
worker
structure
and
like
the
percent
of
some
percentage
of
full-time
work,
is
not
even
like
applicable
in
this
situation.
But
we
didn't
know
that
when
he
did
that-
and
we
don't
know
what
the
answer
is
now.
So
that's
just
my
observation.
H
Exactly
I'm
not
I'm
not
keeping
track
of
how
much
time
maybe
sit
on
the
chair.
I
propose
this
course
where
I
think
I
accomplish,
I
think,
most
of
them
and
even
that
on
on
during
that
work
during
the
worker
period,
I
did
other
things
outside
my
responsibilities
by
helping
the
having
some
corporate
with
tommy
and
caro
about
creating
the
owning
gear
for
the
erc20
contracts.
So
I
some
other
work
up
here
and
the
year
320
kills
well
chocon
chunkan.
I
think
john
can
support
me
on
this.
H
After
the
after
the
audit,
it
requires
some
work
because
I
even
found
other
issues
and
it
worked.
It
ended
up
requiring
a
bit
more.
F
H
E
H
I
was
working
like
I
mean
if
you
see
the
commit,
if
you
see
commits
later
that
were
pushed
they
were
submit
with
two
ways
today,
but
during
that
time
I
was
on
my
cabin
working
alone,
because
I
didn't
have
enough
time
to
connect
and
to
chat
with
you
guys.
I
just
I
just
sit
here,
and
I
call
it
anyway.
Yeah
yeah.
D
Did
anyone
do
it
already
like
in?
Like
me
as
a
non-coder
and
especially
non-solidity
coder?
I
went
through
all
his
commits,
which
also
took
time
for
me,
which
I
could
have
spent
on
like
a
lot
of
other,
but
I
need
to
do
it
and
everyone
needs
to
do
it
like
even
chris.
Who's
like
never
probably
never.
Deals
with
like
solidity
might
need
to
look
into
the
like
the
work
delivered,
and
I
think
everyone
should
look
at
it
and
like
again
evaluate
how
boosters
work.
I
I
Are
you
going
to
be
a
contractor
working
on
a
specific
project
if
we
need
to
the
only
way
to
base
this
off
of
is
like
our
mutual
understanding
is,
and
it's
like
what
we
put
in
writing
and
what
we
say
in
our
worker
proposals
and
if
we
say
we're
going
to
work,
you
know
on
a
part-time
basis
and
we're
you
know.
We
understand
that,
like
certain
goals
might
not
be
met,
but
that
you're
working,
you
know
50
of
your
time,
so
that
means
you're
checking
in
with
everyone,
maybe
not
too
much.
I
I
know
everyone
has
different
working
styles,
but
I
just
feel
like
we
need
to
be
as
clear
about
like
what
we
put
in
the
proposal
and
if
circumstances
change
then
update
the
group.
Otherwise
we
need
to
do
like
if
there's
a
certain
project,
that
we
need
to
complete
a
goal
like
with
block
rocket
it
needs
to
state.
This
is
a
project
we're
trying
to
complete
this
within
three
months.
D
Yeah,
I
understand
to
me,
yeah,
like
we
saw
it
a
little
bit
with.
D
I
raised
the
point
that
agusto
wasn't
available
on
key
base
and
then
he
basically
said,
like
I
didn't
put
that
on
his
like
worker
proposal
and
that's
something
where
I
was
a
little
bit
confused
because,
like
no
one
included
that
in
their
workout
proposals,
but
it's
basically
like
common
sense
that
if
you
work
with
like
a
distributed,
collective,
that
that's
like
basic
like
basic
part
of
it,
that
you
communicating
with
others
and
that
actually
are
available.
B
Yeah
just
to
take
a
step
back
because
so
we
are
really
talking
about
so
this
proposal.
We
have
now
it
sounds
like
it's
already
downstate
and
I
don't
imagine
I'm
not
sure
if
anyone's
gonna
upstake
it
anymore
and
augusto
kind
of
said
it
himself
that
he
wants
to
split
this
into
two
different
proposals
right
so
with
the
current
proposal.
That
kind
of
seems
to
have
sailed
so
we're
kind
of
talking
about
what
would
come
next.
B
I
imagine
there
would
be
two
different
proposals,
one
that's
forward-looking,
and
for
that
the
discussion
is
really
around
gusto,
focusing
on
the
omen
guild
and
whether
that's
kind
of
something
to
focus
on
whether
that's
the
priority
of
dx
dow,
and
I
actually
think,
there's
like
pretty
good
agreement
on
that
now,
right
that
that's
kind
of
where
both
what
geek
style
wants
and
I
think
what
augusto
wants
in
terms
of
like
building
like
the
omen
guild.
So
that's
like
the
proposal
that
would
presumably
be
for,
like
march
and
april,
going
forward
now.
B
The
second
part
of
this
because
we
divide
the
current
proposals
divided
into
two-
is
the
second
half
of
the
last
proposal.
Right,
and
so
this
is
where
those
goals
and
worker
percentage
times
were
committed
to,
and
so
I
guess
the
question
there
is
so
I
think
the
first
half
of
that
proposal
has
been
paid
out
right
because
he
submitted
the
proposal
for
two
months
scope
and
then
requested
the
first
half
of
month,
and
this
one
is
for
the
second
half
of
month.
B
So
I
think
the
question
is
when
there
is
a
disagreement
on
someone's
performance
over
that
period.
What
do
we
do
with
the
second
half
of
that
payment
right?
Is
that
something
that
we
say
like
just
vote
down
and
say
if
we
have
some
disagreement
with
that
worker
that,
like
they,
don't
receive
any
of
that
type
of
payment,
or
do
we
figure
out
like
a
way
to
voice
concerns
about
like
shortcomings
that
that
a
contributor
might
have
but
like?
How
do
we
like
voice
those
concerns,
maybe
even
provide
some
disincentives
or
but,
like?
B
I
guess,
like
what
is
the
way
that
we
like
find
a
solution
to
this,
because,
like
the
only
really
like
solution,
we're
thinking
about
like
the
solutions,
are
proposals
in
this
right.
So
the
solution
is
somehow
is
is
got
to
be
structured
around.
What
do
we
do
about
the
second
half
of
augusto's
last
worker
proposal
right
and
then
what
do
we
do?
Kind
of
going
forward.
D
Yeah,
so
I
think
if
there's
like
a
contentious,
final
payment
proposal,
as
we
see
now,
then
I
think,
like
augusto
needs
to
ask
himself
like
what's
going
on
and
see
if
that
proposal
passes
or
not.
D
If
it's
not
passing
some
there's
an
issue
right
and
then
I
think
the
the
next
step
would
be
that
he's
actually
posting
on
dart
talk
about
his
final
proposal
and
asking
for
like
why
why
it
actually
failed
and
then
the
people
who
brought
it
down
voted
it
down
on
stake
down,
needs
to
like
come
out
and
actually
explain
what's
going
on,
and
then
I,
like
the
best
at
the
end
of
the
day,
everyone
kind
of
wants
to
come
to
a
point
where
both
just
accept
how
like
how
to
proceed
right.
G
G
G
Some
are
still
not
finished
like
in
the
real
world
you
still
get
paid,
but
then
you
you're,
like
it's
very
it's
well
communicated
that
like
it
would
be
awesome
if
you
could
make
sure
that
those
tasks
that
are
not
completed
get
completed.
In
addition
to
the,
for
example,
what
you're
going
to
work
on
the
next
month,
like
the
omen
guild,
for
example,
so
like
instead
of
just
leaving
those
uncompleted?
G
I
think
you
probably
want
to
get
them
completed
too
right.
Maybe
it's
taken
longer
than
expected,
or
there
was
something
some
timing
things
didn't
match
up,
but
like
as
long
as
you
commit
to
like
completing
the
things
that
you
said
that
are
really
needed
for
dxdot,
which
you
already
did
most
of
and
you're
gonna
also
contribute
to
what
dx
down
needs
for
omen
kills
going
forward
like
if,
if
that's
commit
like,
if
you
commit
to
that
in
your
next
proposal,
like
that,
then
like
as
long
as
it's
communicated,
I
think
it's
that's.
G
The
most
important
thing
is
the
communication.
It's
almost
like
an
evaluation,
but
you
know
it's
a
dow
evaluating,
rather
than
like
your
boss,
evaluating
you
at
a
company
right.
H
H
That
I
see
is
that
I
have
to
work
on
something
that
other,
like
only
the
only
both
of
them
expresses
that
hey
the
only
gear
is
important,
and
I
commit
myself
and
I
head
on
down
talk.
I
commit
myself
to
write
the
contract
from
the
allman
guild,
but
seems
like
that
is
not
enough
that
I
should
work
entirely
on
something
else
that
I
don't
want
to
work
on.
So
the
the
path
moving
forward
as
a
way
I
see
will
be.
H
I
submit
a
proposal
for
my
next
working
period,
where
I
say
on
what
what
I
worked
on
or
what
I
want
to
work.
That
is
mainly
dx
volt
and
try
to
finish
that
and
well
of
course,
help
on
the
health
staff
write
a
contract
for
the
human,
and
that
is
if
that
is
not
enough.
They
are
going
to
abold
me
and
I
don't
going
to
be
working
for
the
for
the
exam
anymore.
D
Yeah,
that's
like
a
very
important
question
about,
like
agusta
is
very
it's.
A
very
special
specialized
has
a
very
specialized
skill,
set
it's
difficult
to
find
someone
like
augusto
who
can
actually
deliver
all
the
things
we
need
for
the
omen
guild.
D
How
does
the
collective
deal
with
people
like
augusto,
who
have
their
own
goals
and
their
own
like
project
goals
for
him
dx
vote,
which,
in
my
view,
is
my
personal
view-
has
very
low
priority
right
now
for
the
collective?
Because,
from
my
point
of
view,
the
omen
guild
is
very
important
and
it
I
don't
know
anyone
else
who
can
work
on
the
omen
guild
right
now,
so
I
am
dependent
on
augusto.
D
Right
but
there's
like
the
danger
that
goes
to
us
prioritizing
dx
vault.
A
E
H
Yeah
right
in
the
old
main
guild
it
just
for
me,
it
will
be
write,
a
smart
contract.
You
guys
send
me
the
the
requirements.
I
write,
the
must
the
smart
contract
for
the
omega.
We
do
the
audi
and
then
you
guys
use
it.
That's
it
I
commit
I
I
can
do
it,
that's
it.
That's
the
whole
idea
of
what
I
write
the
gifts.
If
you
need
a
gift
for
the
exile,
you
pass
the
requirements
for
me.
I
write
it.
We
audit
it
and
we
use
it
and
you
guys
can
implement
it
on
on
any
doubt.
H
H
H
Proposal
there
is
a
comment
where
the
concern
about
the
omen
kill
was
was
expressed
and
a
committed
myself.
There
is
a
comment
there
that
I
I
commit
to
write
a
smart
contract
for
the
human
gear
as
soon
as
you
pass
me
the
requirements
I
leave
anything
I
have
any
and
anything
I'm
doing,
and
I
set
a
hundred
percent
to
finance
to
finish
that,
and
then
I
continue
with
my
stuff
with
working
on
the
explode
on
on
finishing
the
extras.
You
know,
on
the
other,
on
my
responsibilities,
I
don't
mind
doing
that.
E
E
So
I
mean
if
you
wanted
to
kind
of
beat
my
opinion
right,
because
my
opinion
is
that
dx
vote
is
not
a
priority
for
dx
dow,
in
that,
if
we
are
paying
anybody
to
do
anything,
it
should
be
in
line
with
the
priorities
that
the
like
the
rest
of
the
workers
think
are
important
right.
So
if,
if
you
think
I'm
wrong,
oh
it
doesn't
take
too
much.
You
got
to
find
a
couple
more
percent
to
beat
me
right,
because
several.
E
This
call
that
would
be
enough
to
get
you
above
me
right,
there's,
probably
even
some
people
out
there
that
individually
could
beat
me
right.
So
I
don't
have
the
power
to
single-handedly,
beat
you
but
like
what
makes
you
think
that
dx
vote
is
a
priority.
Who
here
have
you
talked
to
that
has
expressed
that
dx
vote
is
a
priority.
K
H
B
So
I
think
in
general,
like
we're
now
we're
literally
like
debating
like
worker
proposal,
inclusions
right,
so
I
think
this
is
best
done
through
the
forum,
like
certain
people
have
opinions
on
what
should
be
in
a
gusto's
worker
proposal.
A
augusto
obviously
will
be
writing
and
eventually
doing
it,
so
we
can
solve
those.
B
I
think
specifically
on
that
I,
for
one
will
say
I
think
it's
very
important
that
dx
dao
has
like
owns
its
own
governance,
stack
and
has
a
voting
interface
that
is
easy
to
read
and
use,
and
I
think
that's
like
a
huge
priority
that
can
be
balanced
with
other
like
priorities
we
have,
but
I
think,
like
anything
that
is
contributing.
E
D
And
at
the
end
of
the
day,
looking
back
the
past
few
months,
agusto
worked
on
that
stuff
and
the
collective
is
still
not
using
it
right.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
we
want
to
have
our
own
alchemy
version,
because
alchemy
is
going
to
die,
and
I'm
not
saying
dx
vote
is
like
dead
and
should
be
like
augustus
shouldn't
work
on
it.
The
the
main
question
is
like.
G
E
J
B
B
I
have
looked
at,
I
have
looked
at
dx
vote
and
I've
been
following
the
progress.
I've
been
following
a
gusto's
worker
proposal
and
I've
read
all
of
it.
I
think
everyone's
making
like
good
points.
I
think
that
dx
vote
needs
from
the
last
time
I
looked
at
it.
I
mean
it
was
like
wireframes
and
it
had
like
a
couple
good
things,
but
I
just
want
some
a
better
governance
interface.
You
know.
E
What
you
know
what
I
want
chris,
I
want
omen
to
be
successful.
I
want
swapper
to
be
successful.
I
want
mesa
to
be
successful
and
I
want
the
dxd
holders
that
have
held
all
this
time
and
have
a
token
that's
a
third
of
the
book
value
of
dx
tao
to
actually
realize
some
upside,
and
I
wonder
if
a
gusto
has
put
a
single
thought
into
that,
and
I
encourage
everybody
to
talk
to
each
other
about
what
the
priorities
of
the
dao
should.
J
B
All
right,
we
should
gusto
unless
you
you
anything
else,
you
want
to
say
just
want
to
move
on,
because
we're.
H
No,
no,
I
have
to
say
that,
yes,
I
thought
about
it,
and
that
is
what
I
want
to
create.
The
xbox,
because
I
think
governance
is
like
john
say
is
between
is
the
glue
that
is
joining
all
the
all
our
projects
together
and
we
raise
the
concerns
about
habitat
when
we're
gonna
our
own
governance
platform
in
december,
and
I
think
we
kind
of
all
agree
on
it,
but
now
seems
like
for
john
other
things
are
more
important,
which
is
fine.
It's
his
opinion
but
again
chose
opinion.
H
Has
a
lot
of
weight
in
the
in
the
community
in
the
in
in
this
group?
Lots
of
people
listen
to
him,
so
I
actually.
M
E
N
Just
because
you
know
it's
trailblazing,
these
sort
of
checks
and
balances
for
this
for
the
governance
system-
and
you
know
one
thing-
that's
apparent
in
not
just
the
exile
in
old
house
is
you
know,
alignment
and
making
sure
that
everybody's
kind
of
aligned,
long
term
or
even
in
the
short
term,
for
you
know
what
we're
supposed
to
do,
and
I
don't
know
this
is
just.
I
think
it's
good
at
the
end
of
the
day-
and
you
know
if
you
know
the
question
of
where
should
we
need
a
governance
system
that
this
should
be
a
priority?
N
This
should,
you
know,
be
discussed,
and
but
it
just
in
general.
I
think
this
is
this
is
healthy.
It
makes
me
more
bullish.
We.
B
Have
to
figure
out
way
to
evaluate
like
this
is
all
this
is
like
evaluating.
Adjusting
and,
like
you
know,
I'm
gonna
do
bad
things
that
I
want
people
to
like,
tell
me
and
give
me
feedback
and
like
so
I
can
correct
and
like
get
better
so
I
don't
know
this
is
yeah.
It's
all
part
of
like
a
process
where
we're
trying
to
figure
out
this.
How
to
do
this
in
a
whole
new
way.
D
Right
yeah
and
like
one
of
the
processes
like
augustus
level,
five
commitment
has
more
than
two
percent
rep.
D
Not
everyone
wants
to
say
something
against
augusto
right,
because
we
are
used
to
like
augusta
has
more
to
say,
based
on
red
amount
and
he
is
like
way
more
skilled
based
on
his
commitment
level,
but
everyone
like
even
temp,
like
a
small
portion
of
red,
should
be
skeptical
and
like
especially
when,
when,
like
john
and
me
start
raising
issues
about
his
deliveries.
B
Cool
yeah,
let's
move
on,
I
think
we've
got
yeah
good.
So
next
topic
is
rep
boost
kind
of
quickly.
On
this
for
march,
I
had
two
things
to
say:
I
had
one
nomination
hama,
who
I
think
is
on
the
yeah
hama
is
on
the
call
here
who
had
done
some
good
work
in
putting
together
the
rep
awards
that
we've
had
the
last
last
like
three
or
four
months,
because
he
had
to
go
through
alchemy
and
do
it
one
by
one.
B
So
I'm
working
on
him
on
trying
to
like
build
some
more
rep
data,
so
I
nominated
him
and
I
shared
the
doc
in
the
community
rep
that
I
started
the
spreadsheet
in
the
community
rep
boost
post
and
then
yeah.
B
I
thought
it
would
be
also
interesting
to
see
if
we
can
get
community
rep
boost
involved
with
the
discord
initiative,
just
because
I
think
we
haven't
we're
kind
of
building
a
community
there,
and
I
know
we
did
snifkin
last
month,
who's
been
a
great
contributor,
so
keenan,
I
don't
know
if
you
had
any
ideas
on
like
how
do
we
do
like
a
monthly
rep
award
to
the
top
contributor
on
on
discord
or
any
ideas
there
or
just
anyone
else?.
M
Yeah
a
good
idea
I
had,
I
have
a
participation
based
roles
right
now,
so
it'll
track
the
last
three
months
of
any
user's
participation
in
the
server
and
give
them
a
role
retroactive.
To
that,
I
think
we
could
probably
tie
something
related
to
that,
especially
with
extend
now
and
that
there's
less
fees
involved
in
claiming
these
things.
M
We
don't
have
to
necessarily
give
the
0.1
or
sorry
the
0.1
we
could
go
even
lower
for
if
people
really
want
to
get
involved
and
are
showing
that
they
want
to.
That
being
said,
it's
been,
I
believe,
just
over
a
month
and
a
half
since
the
discord
has
been
public,
we're
seeing
some
good
participation.
We
have
a
couple
people
at
four
and
five.
M
It
currently
goes
up
to
six
and
it's
something
like
a
thousand
messages
that
are
unique
and
I
think
that's
a
really
good
way
to
to
start
the
process
now
monthly.
It
might
be
a
bit
difficult.
Maybe
this
is
something
that
we
nominate
every
three
months,
because
that's
how
we're
tracking
it
right
now.
Alternatively,
I
could
rework
it
to
be
a
monthly
kind
of
check
and
balance,
but
I
I
like
it
better
as
a
three
month
in
case
someone,
you
know,
drops
off
the
board
for
a
month
and
then
all
of
their
participation
is
just
missing.
B
M
It
concluded
I
was
about
to
bring
that
up.
Actually
it
concluded
last
friday
and
I've
been
speaking
with
the
winners
and
handing
out
dxd.
I
think
I'm
almost
in
the
last
couple
here
today.
As
for
the
meme
competition,
we
got
30
entries
and
I
prepared
a
form
that
I'll
leave
in
the
chat
here.
It'd
be
great.
If
everyone
that's
a
full-time
worker,
take
a
good
look,
there's
some
there's
some
funny
ones.
I
know
the
manhole
one
comes
to
mind
for
me.
B
Oh
yes,
I
voted
earlier,
but
and
the
memes
are
in
the
discord.
Meme
channel
is
that
right.
M
Yeah
I
prepared
I
just
numer
numerated
the
the
memes
for
the
purpose
of
voting
on
them.
If
you
don't
have
a
contributor
role,
just
let
me
know,
and
I
can
tag
one
onto
your
account,
so
you
can
see
the
channels.
M
Cool
but
yeah,
I
think
that
the
incentive
program
went
really
well.
We
see
a
lot
of
new
members
a
lot
of
chatting
participation.
B
Cool
yeah,
and
so
if
anyone
else
has
any
rep
boosts,
go
to
the
the
post
is
in
the
forum
there
and
they
just
wanted
to
keep
moving
along.
Next
is
dx
style,
governance,
refunds
round
number.
Four,
so
does
anyone
know
or
look
with
the
total
spending
for
two
months
of
governance?
B
Gas
refunds
is
it's
19.7
eth,
so
this
is
for
january
and
february.
So
it's
like
35
000
for
that.
So
even
with
some
of
the
decreased
amount
of
votings
over
that
time,
still
a
pretty
significant
chunk.
I
should
add
that
this
is
actually
not
live
yet
I
don't
think
he's
on
the
call,
but
nico
has
been
doing
this
in
the
past.
B
But
I've
been
talking
with
dave
about
trying
to
take
this
over
and
being
able
to
calculate
these
governance
refunds
and
we'll
probably
we'll
switch
to
like
a
bi-monthly
cadis.
So
we'll
do
the
contract
and
the
proposal
every
two
months
and
additionally
to
that
for
those
that
are
multi-um.
B
Signers
dave
is
also
going
to
put
the
going
to
divide
the
gas
transactions
that
are
spent
for
the
multisig,
and
the
latest
proposal
into
swapper
liquidity
on
xdi
actually
has
a
a
reimbursement
attached
to
it
for
some
of
the
existing
gas
costs
from
that.
But
we
will
of
course,
still
need
to
have
the
governance
gas
refunds
on
on
mainnet
for
all
the
proposals
there.
B
Cool
and
then
I
just
wanted
to
give
like
quick
update,
because
john
actually
heard
pretty
good
updates
on
each
of
these
things
yesterday.
So
we've
got
kind
of
the
three
proposals:
we're
working
to
a
couple:
different
moving
parts
on
pause,
the
curve,
main
net
liquidity,
relayer
and
dxt
buyback
updates,
and
so
john.
Can
you
just
kind
of
walk
us
through
where,
where
those
are
at
quickly.
E
Sure
yet
so
start
pausing
the
curve,
so
augusto
would
run
some
tests
that
I
double
checked
and
verified
on
rink
b
and
they
worked
so
like.
I
think
we
are
basically
clear
to
make
that
proposal
on
main
net.
If
anybody
wanted
to
do
it,
maybe
there's
some
timing
from
the
communication
side
that
we
want
to
think
about
there.
If
it,
you
know,
maybe
fits
with
some
kind
of
communications
that
want
to
go
around
that
we
maybe
want
to
coordinate
around
that
for
the
dxd
buyback.
E
We
are
currently
sort
of
blocked
there,
because
the
gnosis
protocol,
relayer,
as
some
might
remember,
did
not
work
in
its
kind
of
made
in
flight
on
mainnet.
The
bug
was
a
bug
was
found
and
now
we're
trying
to
test
it
more
but
running
into
issues
trying
to
test
it
like
it's,
it's
basically
a
pretty
opaque
protocol.
You
know
things
are
not
atomic,
they
happen,
they
do
the
solvers.
You
need
owl
liquidity,
gnosis
isn't
really
like
they're
supporting
it
now,
but
it's
not
their
priority.
E
So
we're
still
trying
to
test
that.
I
think
there's
maybe
a
question
now
of
whether
we
want
to
continue
that
course
and
try
to
see
that
through
or
if
maybe
it
makes
more
sense
to
adapt
like
the
existing
relayers
to
use.
You
know,
swapper.
Let's
say
I
actually
think
it
might
be
cool
to
use
swapper
since
it's
the
external
protocol
so
kind
of
more.
E
You
know
tbd
on
the
dxd
buyback,
we're
kind
of
waiting
on
the
technical
stuff
to
be
cleared
there,
but
but
that's
being
worked
on
and
what
was
the
last
thing,
the
liquidity
main
net
yeah
I
mean
that
liquidity
so
mainland,
so
there
has
been
a
deposit
of
main
liquidity
using,
so
the
multisig
is
owning
the
relay
right
now
and
once
there
is
a
new
multi-color
scheme
that
white
lists
that
relayer
the
the
goal
would
be
for
the
multi
stick
to
hand
that
over
to
the
dxtel,
so
yeah
that
could
take
you
know
just
installing
a
new
multi
call
scheme
takes
about
17
days
to
pass.
E
So
that's
at
least
a
few
weeks
out.
So
I
mean,
if
you
know,
the
product
strategy
goals
were
to
do
more
deposits
on
mainnet.
I
think
that
could
still
be
done
through
the
multisig,
but
we
do
want
to
kind
of
get
it
back
in
the
hands
of
the
dow
as
soon
as
possible.
B
Yeah,
that's
a
good
point
on
the.
We
could
still
put
liquidity
into
mainnet
while
the
multi-call
scheme
is
being
installed,
but
it'll
just
get
transferred
over
later
and
it's
kind
of
sky
was
saying
it's
good.
It
takes
time
to
put
these
things
into
place,
so
maybe
we
do
get
started
before
that,
and
also
like
testing
out
some
of
the
other
pairs,
while
also,
of
course,
we'll
be
putting
when
that
is
being
the
multi-call
steam
is
being
installed
on
mainnet
we're
going
to
be
putting
more
liquidity
on
xdi
anyway.
Building
building
that
up.
E
Yeah,
I
mean
speaking
of
priorities,
you
know
carrying
out
the
dxd
buyback
and
preparing
you
know
the
technical
stuff.
For
that,
that's
something
that
needs
will
need
attention
and
nico
has
been
working
on
that
niko's
spread
very
thin.
He's
responsible
for
you
know,
mesa
smart
contracts
he's
been
doing.
The
relayer
stuff
he's
also
been
helping
out
a
lot
on
the
security.
So
I
know
augusta
may
want
to
work
on
vxvo,
but
something
like
the
relay
would
be
something
I
would
advocate
for
needing
attention.
G
G
We
can
either
wait
for
farming
to
be
legit
and
ready
to
go,
or
we
can
literally
do
what
a
bunch
of
projects
have
done
like
uma
and
you
name
it
balancer
or
whatever,
and
and
start
with
a
manually
announced
incentive
which
includes
you
know
a
certain
period
of
time
put
put
dxd
liquidity
into
this
pool.
We're
gonna,
take
a
snapshot
once
a
week,
make
sure
you
you
haven't
gone
in
and
out
or
moved
your
liquidity
and
and
we'll
protect
against
some
impermanent
loss
and
the
incentives
are
going
to
be
pretty
attractive.
G
So
that
should
account
for,
like
actually
could
account
for
the
impermanent
loss.
So
and
like
literally,
do
a
manual
and
like
do
that
next
week
and
just
get
incentive
for
that
pool
and
then
when
farming
is
ready,
we
can
switch
over
to
the
farming
platform.
But,
like
is,
do
people
think
that
that's
a
good
idea
to
do
that
like
next
week
or
to
wait
to
really
build
that
incentivize
that
that
dxd
pull,
because
actually
we're
going
to
need
to
do
a
proposal?
G
B
I
think
we
should
dive
into
this
on
friday
and
get
an
answer
then,
but
I
think
that
like
this
is,
these
are
all
like.
This
is
the
kind
of
the
questions
we
need
to
be
figuring
out,
because
it's
balancing
yeah
balancing
a
couple
things.
B
Cool
cool
and
then
I
think
that
yeah
and
then
just
like
the
last
two
things
to
kind
of
keep
things
going
year-
one
I
haven't
done
it
yet,
but
I
will
I'm
gonna,
create
a
signal
proposal
for
eip1559
just
to
maybe
create
a
little
bit
of
governance.
Discussion
there's
been
like
a
threat
on
that
over
the
last
week.
So
if
there's
any
objections,
please
let
me
know.
B
And
then
the
last
thing
is
just
some
updates
on
like
hr,
recruiting
stuff
we've
been
talking
about
this
a
lot
the
last
or
for
a
while.
Actually,
but
in
the
last
week
there's
kind
of
been
we've
revisited
it.
So
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
do
a
regroup
on
on
where
we're
at
and
kind
of
keep
things
in
essentially
in
a
central
place.
So
this
post,
I
just
posted
right
before
this
meeting
kind
of
two
different
things,
so
one
it
has
what
is
dx
style
looking
for.
B
So
there
are
a
couple
different
documents
here:
one
is
the
dxdow
open
positions,
google
doc.
So
this
is
an
internal
one
that
we
can
edit
and
if
there's
any
squad
leader,
anyone
that
is,
that
needs,
work
or
talent
or
specific
position,
make
sure
to
put
it
on
that
sheet.
So
that's
the
google
doc
open
positions.
B
There
is
the
open
positions
pdf
on
ipfs,
which
has,
I
believe,
five
different
positions,
maybe
six
positions
in
a
single
document
and
a
brief
description
about
dx
dao
and
what
we're
looking
for
in
the
roles
and
that's
on
ipfs
and
that's
what's
like
linked
to
in.
We
link
to
in
like
twitter
or,
if
you're,
just
sending
someone
who's
interested
in
a
bunch
of
different
roles,
and
then
there
are
individual
job
description,
pdfs
also
host
on
ipfs
for,
like
the
five
main
positions,
we're
kind
of
looking
for
here.
B
So
hopefully
those
are
like
a
central
hub
and
then,
if
you
have,
if
we
need
to
make
updates,
we
can
do
that
to
the
the
open
positions,
google
doc.
That
is
also
in
in
this
thread.
There
has
been
some
like
pretty
good
progress.
I
think
on
some
of
these,
so
we
have,
I
think
two
different
people
were
thinking
about,
maybe
getting
some
help
on
the
hr
from
keenan
and
tammy.
I
think
I've
seen
them
both
in
the
key
base.
So
that's
something
there.
B
Fluid
drop
or
dave
has
been
helpful
and
is
completing
his
the
end
of
his
second
week
on
the
treasury
accounting
position.
I
think
he's
done
some.
Some
great
work
there
mackinac
has
been,
has
been
doing
a
lot
of
great
work
on
omen
and
just
like
marketing
and
stuff
a
lot
of
like
the
twitter
stuff.
B
So
I
think
we've
been
making
some
good
progress,
but
I
think
we
just
need
to
constantly
be
thinking
about
it,
and
so
hopefully
those
docs
will
be
a
good
way
for
what
are
people
looking
for
and
then
separate
to.
That
is
like
how
do
we
filter
the
process
or
get
things
coming
in,
and
this
is
tough
because,
like
we
don't
have
an
easy
way
to
do
this.
We
don't
have
like
a
central
way
where
we
can
like
host,
resumes
and
filter
them,
or
something
like
that.
B
B
I
need
to
do
next
and
I
definitely
think
we're
having
like
a
roadblock
there
and
I
think
it's
tough
to
get
to
an
instant
decision
quickly
and
I
think
it's
okay
for
us
to
be
picky,
but
we
want
to
be
able
to
engage
that
candidate
and
make
sure
there's
something
that
they
can
potentially
consume
and
yeah.
So
I
think
kind
of
the
three
steps
that
I'm
that
I
think
are
best
and
I
think
would
would
be
able
to
filter
this
out
is
so
one
send
them
the
contributor
guidelines
and
how
we
work.
B
This
was
a
documentary
martin
put
together,
so
this
just
kind
of
gives
them.
You
know
a
whole
lay
of
the
land
for
dx
style,
so
that's
kind
of
the
first
step.
Second:
is
they
should
make
an
introduction
in
the
key
base
introductions
channel
and
then
third,
they
should
attend
a
call,
that's
relevant
to
them.
If
the
developer
develops
attend
the
developer,
call
if
they're
a
biz,
dev
person
attend
the
biz,
dev
call
or
engage
with
that
call
in
some
way.
B
I
will
do
a
better
job
of
monitoring
the
introductions
channel
on
key
base
to
make
sure
that
we
like,
when
things
go
in
there,
that
we
have
some
way
of
like
contacting
and
making
sure
that
they're
invited
to
a
call,
but
I
do
think
like
we're
always
going
to
have
a
lot
of
flow
and
it's
going
to
be
hard
for
us
to
filter
it.
B
So
I
think
requiring
some
like
proof
of
work
or
proof
of
effort
really
on
the
candidate
is
is
best
and
I
think
really
it's
like
read
the
docs,
introduce
yourself
in
key
base
and
sit
on
a
call
and
then
like
see
what
happens,
because
it's
kind
of
you
know
it's
hard
to
to
make
everything
happen
at
once,
but
we
really
want
to
be
only
dealing
with
people
that
I
think
have
gone
through.
Those
initial
steps,
so
thoughts,
questions
concerns
additions,
yeah.
A
B
Well,
I
think
I
want
this
is
speaking
for
myself
with
people
that
are
like
both
I'm
looking
at
looking
for
people
and
also
like,
if
you're
sending
someone
my
way,
if
I'd
say,
yay
or
nay,
I
want
people
who
get
dx
doubt
right
and,
like
that
encompasses,
you
know
a
lot
of
different
things.
Probably
someone
who's
just
looking
to
get
a
paycheck
like
that's,
probably
not
a
good
fit,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
people
like
working
with
dick
style
who
are
like
trying
to
build
cool
things.
B
Make
money,
and
you
know,
hopefully
we
can.
We
can
find
a
fit,
but
it
is.
I
do
think
we
do
want
like
people
who
get
it.
A
Yeah-
and
I
think
that's
part
of
the
problem
like
this-
it's
so
like
there
is
like
not
many
people
who
are
like
that
like
to
get
it
and
to
be
a
you
know:
senior
developer,
like
it's
like
almost
impossible,
like,
in
my
opinion,.
N
What
one
thing
we
should
consider
is
having
like,
like
a
trello
board
with
tasks
that
you
know,
could
be
used
for,
like
first
timer,
both
dev
and
like
non-dev
badger
dao.
Has
this
with
surprisingly
ingomar
managing
so
yeah
like
use
this
as
an
example.
F
Yeah
my
takes,
we
need
like
people
who
are
have
knowledge
in
crypto
and
blockchain
also
if
they
are
non-tech
people,
because
otherwise
I
think
it's
very
hard
to
understand
what
kind
of
mindset
we
have-
and
this
is
maybe
a
big
issue.
If
you
want
to
onboard
like
non-tech
people
and
for
the
tech
people,
I
think
they
they
have.
F
Of
course
they
know
they
need
to
know
about
crypto
and
I
think
also
they
they
have
to
be
into
the
dao
in
a
way
you
know-
and
this
means
they
have
to
understand-
that
we
are
not
like
a
normal
employee.
We
are
just
yeah,
we
are
different
and
in
a
way,
everyone-
and
now
I
have
some
new
contacts
right
now
and
but
I
see
people
should
really
be
able
to
try
to
identify
where
they
can
add
value,
and
this
is
not
an
easy
task.
F
It's
difficult,
but
I
think
that
the
good
people
who
want
to
work
with
us
they
should
be
able
to
see
what's
missing
in
a
way
and
it
takes
some
time
to
find
this
spot.
But
if
you
are
interested,
I
think
you
should
be
able
to
identify
in
a
way
what's
missing,
because
I
think
these
people
they
will
stay
a
long
time
with
us
other
people.
F
They
will
just
drop
out
if
they
have
new
opportunities
and
that's
it's
too
much
work
in
a
way
to
not
to
onboard,
but
I
I
did
see
how
I
like
the
team
forming
how
the
team
was
formed
on
mesa
and
it's
not
an
instant
success.
So
people
need
time
to
to
to
join
the
team
and
you
and
to
see
how
we
work,
and
so
it's
an
investment
from
the
digs
now,
and
so,
if
people
just
drop
out,
we
lose
this
investment
and
yeah.
F
B
I
I
think
hr
person
filled,
we
can
someone
who
can
really,
you
know,
walk
people
through
and
get
them
through
this.
This
big
first
challenge
and
just
get
them
to
work.
I
agree.
G
Yeah
and
it's
become
identifying
what's
missing
and
like
coming
to
a
call
for
the
like
coming
to
this
call
for
the
first
time
ever
like
it's
got
to
be
overwhelming,
because
there's
so
many
moving
things
and
so
many
topics,
but
it's
b,
it
has
been
done
recently,
like
venky,
has
identified,
what's
missing
and
has
it
plugged
himself
in
like
a
number
of
places
and
he's
even
part-time
right.
So
we
like
okay,
nathan's
here
now
and
there's
other
new
people
coming
in
and
we
can
get
feedback
from
them
on,
because
some
will
just
ask.
G
I
like
I
can't
tell
like
what
where
I'm
needed,
and
so
they
can
ask
like
we're
open
and
anyone
can
ask
any
questions.
So
if
we
can
point
people
in
directions
and
we
can
steer
them,
but
they
have
to
like
take
the
initiative
to
like
identify,
what's
missing,
yeah,
exactly
which
is
cool.
N
If
you
want
to
come
and
you
know
kind
of
join
and
then
you
know
you
look
at
something
that
you
can
do
and
just
push
that
theoretically,
anyone
could
come
to
the
league
style,
be
here
for
a
couple
of
weeks
and
then
make
a
proposal
to
change
something
or
to
push
something
or
you
know
to
do
something,
and
I
think
this
is
what
this
is.
What
really
makes
this
thing
unique
compared
to
like
a
traditional
company,
and
this
is
what
we
should
be
looking.
H
For
yeah
exactly
and
take
them
all
from
here
from
each
working
on
what
they
want
to
work
on
like,
if
I
think
I
said
it's
no,
but
really.
I
think
you
take
a
lot
of
you.
You
take
a
lot
from
someone
who
is
working
on
on
something
that
that
really
wants
to
work
on
right.
I
think
everyone
here
finds
a
place
on
something
they
they
like
to
work
and
they
feel
identified
and
then
and
and
they
pursue.
H
You
know
that
that
part
of
other
ico,
where,
where
they
want
to
work,
yes,
you
have
to
have,
then
you
have
all
the
community
centers
on
on
helping
other
workers
on
or
on
or
having
other
works,
I'm
giving
a
hand
if
someone
needs
help
on
something,
but
then
I
think
everyone
here
has
a
place
where,
where
we
are
growing-
and
that
is
that
we
are
responsible
for
and
we
are
following,
where
do
we
want
to
work
on
right?
H
Not
this
is
a
good
thing
here.
You
have
you
find
a
place
and
if
the
other
people
find
that
you
are
useful,
that
you
are
that
you
are
helping
that
you
are
providing
value
awesome,
but
if
not
okay,
you
got
kicked
out
like
now.
We
are
going
to
see.
If
that
is
going
to
happen
with
me,
you
know,
maybe
I
maybe
I'm
not
running
enough
value
and
I
got
kicked
out,
but
that
is
that's
how
it
works.
You
know
good
stuff
for
me.
N
I
don't
think
this
is
it's
this
black
and
white,
though
like
when
I
say
when,
when
I
say
someone
is
coming
with
initiative,
it's
not
like
you
know.
I
come
with
a
perfect
idea.
I
present
it
to
the
dicks
down
and
then
I
do
it.
Doesn't
that
never
happens
like
the
value
here
is
that
you
have
a
community.
N
You
come
with
an
initiative
and
then,
through
that
dao
through
this
community,
your
initiative
gets
shaped,
and
then
you
work
with
other
people
to
build
that
I
mean
just
the
famous
quotes
from
like
medicare
cartel
that
I'm
not
sure
where
they
took
it
from.
But
if
you
want
to
go
fast,
you
know
go
alone.
If
you
want
to
go
far,
go
together
or
something
like
that,
so
like
yes,
yes,
but
also.
H
A
H
To
other
requirements
to
other
priorities
that
that
we
have,
like-
maybe
you
know
in
in
a
year
another
pro
one
project
is
going
to
be
diana
another
one
is
going
to
be
a
starting
like.
A
H
Here
so
that
is
that
that
we
should
be
open
for
for
for
change
and
shape
on
our
on
our
priorities,
and
I
think
that's
awesome.
N
And
that's
what
I
like
to
be
specific
on
this
case,
I
will
say
that
I
want
to.
I
really
want
to
work
with
you
on
a
voting
or
or
a
dow
app,
but
this
has
to
be
like,
like
you
know,
there
has
to
be
like
some
sort
of
a
team
that
works
on
this,
because
you
know
there
are
so
many
decisions
to
make,
and
this
is
something
you
cannot
do
alone
so
yeah.
This
is
just
like
yeah.
My
thoughts
about
this,
because
obviously
digs
down
needs
a
new
voting.
H
Exactly
and
anyone
can
can
come
and
kind
of
start
helping
me
out.
There
is
a
lot
of
stuff
that
that
I
need
to
do
and
anyone
who
wants
to
work
with
me.
He
can
just
let
me
know
and
and
if
we
can
find
a
place
to
work
together.
That
is
awesome.
I
was
always
open
for
that
augusta.
I
invite
you
into
the.
B
I
think
you
need
a
more
formal
invitation
like
send
some
something
over
the
mail
to
gusto's
house
that
he's
building.
H
B
I
think
the
guilds
could
be
a
huge
like
expansion
opportunity
for
dx
dow,
and
it
really
will
be
like
omen
who's
demonstrating
that
capability,
because
it's
really
like
a
whole
new.
Like
governance
tax,
I
mean,
I
think,
there's
a
there's
a
lot
of
yeah
potential
there
and
I'm
excited
to
see
what
we
can
do.
D
E
Well,
that's
another
example:
wouldn't
that
be
a
higher
priority
than
dx
vote,
and
it's
not
that
I
wouldn't
love
to
have
a
better
voting
interface
but
we've.
You
know
people
have
talked
about
some
of
these
things
that
have
not
been
delivered
yet
right,
like
txt
guild.
We're
going
to
need
to
do
omen
token.
If
we
want
to
do
only
guild
and
other
stuff.
H
Or
then
on
that
we
agree,
I
I
think
the
exe
gives
a
higher
priority
than
the
export
right
now
and
we
have
the
contract,
but
after
it,
after
it
is
a
lead,
we
can
decide
on
where
we
are
going
to
implement
it
and
we
without
it
and
we
are-
and
we
add
it
in
one
of
our
a
part
of
our
system.
But
right
now
is
there
like
we
haven't.
We
have
it.
I
in
anywhere
else
yeah
is
there
to
be
done,
but
that's
something
that
kind
of
stop.
B
I
Yeah
limited
resources
at
this
point
and
like
if
we
can
just
agree
to
like
help
each
other
like
a
gusto.
Your
your
feedback
so
far
on
the
omen
guild
has
been
really
really
helpful
and
you've
been
available
for
any
questions
that
have
come
up
and
I
just
hope
you
know
once
we
can
like
wrap
up
this
last
round
of
questions
which
is
basically
today,
one
more
and
then
the
tech
meeting
on
friday,
which
I
think
we're
planning
for.
Then
you
know.
I
Hopefully
you
know
your
role
will
be
somewhat
fast
and
then
moving
on
to
like
the
dxd
guild.
I
think
I
agree
with
you.
I
think
that's
definitely
a
huge
priority.
B
Cool
all
right,
long
meeting
but
yeah,
so
we
got
community
call
tomorrow
and
then
product
strategy
call
on
friday,
so
important
stuff.
I
think
for
omen
guild
and
then
also
swapper
liquidity
for
friday's
call.