►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2020-09-30]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
Welcome
to
the
september
30th
2020
edition
of
the
governance
discussion.
Let's
kick
things
off
start
with
kind
of
a
governance
1.0
thing,
so
we
talked
last
week
and
in
the
forums
a
lot
about
the
worker
compensation
guidelines.
I
think
we
landed
on
a
pretty
good
compromise
on
a
couple
different
areas.
B
B
I
do
think,
there's
still
obviously
a
lot
of
questions
on
the
actual
logistics
of
the
the
vesting
component,
whether
it's
gas,
efficiencies
or
or
kind
of
how
non-technical
workers
can
do.
But
hopefully
this
can
provide
some
some
structure
for
that
going
forward.
So
I
don't
know
if
anyone
had
any
thoughts
or
comments
on
the
guidelines
of
the
proposal
in
the
queue.
B
Cool
all
right,
let's
keep
moving.
I
mentioned
this
in
passing.
You
know,
we've
come
up,
there's
been
some
kind
of
discussions
over
the
last
month
or
so
on
kind
of
the
state
of
rep
and
how
people
are
kind
of
distributing
it.
Obviously,
we
had
the
community
rep
boost
initiative
that
skye
led,
which
is,
I
think,
a
really
great
way
of
bringing
some
community
members
that
were
already
in
the
fold
kind
of
along
and
kind
of
tagging
on.
D
B
I
think
it's
important
for
us
to
have
some
more
transparency
and
just
kind
of
understanding
of
what
we're
doing
kind
of
on
the
the
rep
front.
I
put.
I
came
up
with.
B
Share
my
screen
here,
so
I
think
it's
a
good
idea,
maybe
to
kind
of
start
a
rep
report
or
some
type
of
like
kind
of
quarterly
look
at
the
state
of
rep.
I
think
there's
something
I'm
kind
of
trying
to
work
on
so
I'd
be
interested
to
get
some
feedback
on
it
from
you
guys.
B
Okay,
all
right
does
that
work,
yeah
all
right
cool,
so
just
think
about
what
so
what
the
current
rep
distribution.
I
I
think
it's
interesting.
I
look
on
alchemy
and
you
actually
notice
like
if
you're,
if
you're
looking
a
lot,
you
can
see
how
just
the
number
of
rep
changes.
Obviously
this
is
like
people
kind
of
coming
new
rep
being
distributed,
but
there's
also
something
like
if
you're
voting,
some
of
things
are,
are
just
our
stake.
B
So
I
think
if
we
kind
of
just
understand
the
current
rep
distribution
and
then
I
think
it's
key
to
look
at
rep
inflation
sense,
a
the
genesis
which
I
think
would
probably
be
around
like
36
percent
35
percent
and
then
two
sends
the
dxd
fundraiser
and
then
I
think,
looking
at
kind
of
projections
going
forward
like
if
that
is
the
inflation
rate
like
what
does
that
mean
for
say
the
next
year
or
two
in
terms
of
rep
issuance
and
then
I
think.
B
Lastly,
like
rep
award
logistics-
and
I
know
this
is
one
that
I've
been
kind
of
fooling
not
fooling
around
with
but
just
kind
of
noticing,
as
I'm
becoming
more
familiar
with
alchemy,
that
obviously
like
when
you
have
a
successful
proposal,
you
actually
get
a
rep
reward
for
that
and
there's
a
whole
kind
of
like
rep
staking
thing.
If
you,
if
you
vote
on
a
proposal,
so
I
think
just
kind
of
understanding,
those
and
kind
of
clearly
laying
out
them
would
be
good.
The.
B
How
I
think
is
actually
more
important,
and
maybe
someone
can
provide
some
inside
of
this,
but
I
mean
it.
I
I've
looked
at
kind
of
rep
distribution
and
I
put
some
document
together.
Maybe
it
was
like
a
month
or
so
ago,
and
I
basically
just
like
downloaded
from
the
alchemy
ui,
and
so
I'm
wondering
if
we
could
obviously
get
a
rep
snapshot
at
different
dates
would
be
one
way.
B
The
other
way
is
obviously
just
looking
at
like
proposal
by
rep
rewards,
so
maybe
be
good
if
we
could
kind
of
work
with
someone
to
kind
of
do
that
and
then,
like
the
future
rep
goals,
what
are
we
kind
of
aspirations?
Is
there
different
different
things
that
we
want
to
strive
to?
Maybe
a
little
too
early
to
kind
of
put
that
into
a
document
like
this,
but
I'm
just
kind
of
thinking
about
that
and
then
the
same
thing:
community
rep
boost
and
the
ideas
of
permissionless
rep.
B
These
are
kind
of
things
that
we
want
to
promote.
But
what
is
the
kind
of
structure
and
processes
to
make
those
more
systematic,
so
thoughts
comments,
things?
We
should
could
kind
of
look
at
more
or
suggestions
on
how
to
kind
of
pull
some
of
this
data.
E
Yeah,
so
for
pulling
this
data
like
even
I
can
help
you
with
the
graph
to
like
pull
all
this
data
of.
Basically,
you
know
address
and
reputation,
and
you
know,
as
you
were
talking,
I
thought
this.
This
could
be
like
a
great
bounty
to
create.
You
know
a.
D
E
Dashboard
that
updates
basically
takes
it
reads:
the
data
every
day
sees
the
reputation
changes.
You
can
even
have
a
line
that
kind
of
shows
what's
the
goal
and
if
we're
following
that,
I
think
this
could
be
like
an
interesting
bounty
and
I'm
I'm
happy
to.
I
don't
know,
discuss
this
and
inspect
this
out
like
a
little
more
but
yeah
to
have
basically
a
live
graph
of
the
reputation
holders,
the
goal,
the
reputation,
distribution
goals,
etc.
A
I
had
some
thoughts
which
I
shared
in
one
of
the
key
based
chats.
I
think
it
was
is
we've
been,
we've
been
actually
not
well,
not
paying
attention,
and
maybe
not
doing
this
correctly
because
and
nylon.
I
think
you,
you
helped
clarify
some
of
the
things.
There
are
certain
actions
in
in
the
system
where,
if
you
do
those
actions,
you
get
a
certain
amount
of
set
rep.
I
think
it's
like.
A
That
creates
a
like
a
standard,
a
precedent
for
like
what
rep
goes
towards
an
action,
and
so,
if,
if
you
get
0.03
rep
to
just
put
in
a
proposal
that
all
of
a
sudden
makes
other
things
like
doing
a
bounty
that
takes
a
week
to
earn
point,
one
percent
rep
like
they,
don't
they
don't
align
with
each
other
and
then
working
for
a
a
month
full
time.
You
get
point
one
six
percent
rep
so
because
some
actions
are
set
to
amounts
of
rep.
A
That
already
creates
a
standard,
so
everything
should
be
based
off
of
those
standards.
Otherwise,
you
need
to
change
those
standards.
Otherwise,
the
numbers
that
we
talk
about
with
rep
and
like
what
our
targeted
inflation
will
be
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff
like
it's
all,
going
to
get
thrown
off,
because
someone
at
some
point
just
like
set
some
standards
and
because
some
standards
are
set,
the
rest
of
the
standards
have
to
be
based
in
in
in
like
off
of
those
standards
and
so
getting
very
difficult.
F
One
problem
that
arises
that
I
was
just
kind
of
realizing
recently
is,
if,
like
I'm
doing
a
lot
of
proposals,
not
just
for
my
own
worker
proposals,
but
maybe
because
I'm
facilitating
the
audits-
and
you
know
helping
some
other
people
out
with
whatnot,
I'm
accumulating
a
lot
of
raptures
from
making
the
proposals,
even
though
I'm
over
the
max
rep
right.
So
really
I
shouldn't
be
getting
anything,
but
I
am
because
of
these
and
what
this
is.
F
It's
called
the
proposer
reward
yeah
and
for
the
contribution
reward
scheme,
which
is
the
most
common
kind
of
proposals
they
get
made.
It's
500
reputations,
so
it's
a
fixed
number,
so
that
percentage
will
go
down
over
time.
That's
a
good
thing,
but
maybe
now
can
we
actually
change
that
via
proposal?
I
think
we
might
be
able
to.
E
Yeah,
so
technically
you
can't
yeah.
I
don't
think
you
can
update
it,
but
you
can
essentially
create
a
new
voting
power
funding
and
voting
power
scheme
with
different
parameters,
and
you
know
that
could
be
set
to
zero.
For
example,
like
the
the
proposal
reward.
A
Yeah
like
if
we
we
have
like
a
million,
what
is
it
1.2
million
rep
like
that
that,
in
some
of
those
numbers
imply
that,
if
a
small
action
like
a
proposal
is,
is
0.03
rep.
It
implies
that,
like
the
system
is
kind
of
built
to
like
quickly
get
to
like
five
million
reps,
like
we've,
been
trying
to
keep
rep
like
close
to
one
million
and
expanding
it.
Smartly.
B
And
I
think
it
could
affect
like.
I
don't
know
if
these
are
like
community
standards,
but
even
just
think
about
worker
proposals
right
the
fact
that
we
do
those
over
two
months
and
split
out
the
dxd
like
just
having
the
number
of
proposals
is
a
way
of
kind
of,
and
even
like
just
from
you
know
me,
I
guess
I
submitted
the
proposal
for
the
worker
compensation
guidelines
like
I
think
it
actually
could
matter
long
term
who
the
proposer
is
that
that
has
effect,
maybe
on
like
how
people
would
boost
or
unboost
things.
B
So
I
I
don't
know
if
we
should
like
yeah,
that
that
is,
I
don't
know
just
what
are
the
community
standards
on
these
things
into
like
when
we
want
something
to
go
to
the
proposal
stage,
but
anyway,
I
think
this
is.
This
is
like
a
good
thing.
The
the
reason
and
nylon
is
good
to
hear
one
of
the
reasons
I
wanted
to
do
this
report,
and
thinking
about
this
is
because
I'm
also
thinking
about
like
kind
of
the
reputation
based
governance,
talk
that
we
were
that
we've
been
mentioning.
B
I
think
this
would
be
a
very
good
way
to
use
some
of
this
use
some
of
this
data
for
that,
and
I
also
think
we
can
kind
of
hit
on
some
of
these
other
issues
at
the
bottom.
G
I
was,
I
was
taking
a
look
at
the
plugin
manager
on
alchemy
and
seeing
that
you
have
the
option
to
edit
the
current
scheme,
where
the
scheme
configuration
so
the
way
it
works.
Every
scheme
has
a
configuration
and
from
this
configuration
you
get
a
configuration
id.
Let's
call
it
the
configuration
hash
so
see
that
we
can
see.
Since
we
can
update
it
naidon,
we
will
just
need
to
assign
the
new
configuration
hash
to
the
to
this
scheme
to
the
contribution
reward
scheme.
G
E
Like
the
process
here
would
probably
be
to
register
a
new
funding
and
voting
power
and
then
unregister
the
old
one.
E
G
Okay,
okay,
awesome!
Well
that
shouldn't
be
hard
to
do
to
deploy
a
new
contribution
reward
scheme
with
the
same
configuration.
G
Also,
since
we
are
going
to
do
this,
maybe
this
is
a
an
opportunity
to
change
in
other
parameters.
What
about
making
the
contribution
rewards
a
bit
faster
like
instead
of
waiting
a
week?
Why
don't
we
wait
five
days,
for
example
right
for
or
if
the
proposal
is
boosted,
weighed
even
less.
E
Yeah
another
option
here
like
if
we're
opening
this
box
is
to
also
have
multiple
contribution
rewards
and
we
can
have
you
know
one
that's
kind
of
like
for
faster
things,
maybe
only
for
signal
proposals
and
then
another
one
for
slower
things,
which
is
like
funding
proposals.
E
I
don't
know,
I
don't
think
so
like
this
is
kind
of
like
a
social
consensus,
so
we
know
that
you
know.
Let's
say
one
of
the
contribution
reward
is
only
for,
let's
say,
worker
proposals
and
one
of
the
contribution
reward
is
only
for
I
don't
know
something
else.
G
G
E
Yeah
I
mean
I
mean
at
any
rate,
I
was
thinking
you
know
if
right
now,
I
think
it's
the
way
I
look
at
these
things
is,
what's
the
minimum
time
from
proposal
to
passing,
and
I
think
right
now,
it's
seven
days
so
you
could
have
like
you
know
five
days
for
worker
proposals,
seven
days
for
other
proposals
or
something
of
that
sort.
But
this
is,
I
guess
this
is
like
a
box
that
we
need
to
open.
G
D
G
And
the
the
fast
forward,
I
think
we
all
agree
that
we
have
way
many
schemes
where,
for
example,
all
the
maybe
all
the
e
s
skins
can
be
put
away.
You
know
in
a
simple
multiple
that
is
related
to
ens.
G
We
can
have
a
multi-cord
that
is
just
for
sending
tokens
and
ether
and
we
can
have
a
multi-code
that
is
just
for
d5
investment.
There
we
have
one
for
playing
manager,
you
can
do
all
from
four
schemes,
but
yeah
I'm
just
returning,
but
we
should
focus
on
reach
and
configuration
of
that
style.
I
think.
E
Yeah,
so
I
think
the
first
step
here
would
be
deciding
a
new
funding
and
voting
power
with,
let's
say,
different
proposal
award.
I
think
that
it's
nice,
that
someone
will
get
even
you
know,
a
small
amount
of
reputation,
so
they
are
as
soon
as
they
make
a
proposal.
They
are
a
part
of
the
dao
and
then
yeah
for
the
rest
of
this,
the
rest
of
the
parameters
we
can
discuss.
B
Yeah,
just
to
I
think,
kind
of
the
adjusting
the
schemes
would
be
helpful
and
kind
of
fall
into
the
governance.
One
point
x
bucket
of
like
okay,
we
can
kind
of
make
some
small
changes
to
the
existing
one.
I
do
think
it's
important
that
we
like
just
to
kind
of
figure
out
how
to
move
forward
on
this.
B
I
do
think
we
need
to
start
having
kind
of
rep
just
reports,
discussions
enhancements
and
I
think
that's
where
this
configuration
scheme
discussion
is
coming
from
so
all
kind
of
work
on
putting
together
some
of
this
information
and
nylon
would
be
great
if
we
could
work
on
pulling
from
some
of
this
on
the
graph
and
then
we'll
present
initial
findings
on
next
week's
governance.
B
Discussion
call
and
then
hopefully
we
can
figure
out
a
little
bit
more
about
what
type
of
scheme
changes
we
want
to
make
once
we
kind
of
understand
the
way
of
the
land.
E
Yeah,
I
I
want
to
propose
something
here,
because
I
this
is
something
that
I
had
in
my
mind,
but
this
is,
I
think,
maybe
a
good
time
to
actually
put
it
up.
I
think
we
should
create
some
like
three
or
four
people
working
groups,
so
this
is
like
a
good
example.
These
three
or
four
people
will
be
tasked
to
research.
What
the
new
parameters
should
be
offer
a
couple
of
options
to
everyone
and
then
and
then
yeah,
you
know
fi.
E
H
No,
it
totally
makes
sense.
I
100
agree.
E
Yeah
the
way,
the
way
I
see
this,
you
can
even
have
that
specific
topic.
You
can
even
have
someone
who's
accountable,
who's
sort
of
the
leader
for
that,
and
you
know
he's
leading
he's
deciding
on
like
you
know
the
structure
of
the
team
and
what
needs
to
be
done
and
then
kind
of
like
the
way.
I
see
it,
it's
kind
of
if
you
have
a
flat
organization
that
someone
rises
to
the
top
or
rises
picks
a
group
of
people
with
them
to
do
a
certain
task
and
then
essentially
comes
back
to
the
flag
organization.
E
B
Dxl
yeah,
I
agree
it's
kind
of
another
example
of
things
I
think
we've
seen
in
the
past
yeah
cool.
I
did
just
want
to
check
quickly,
ingomar,
to
see
if
there
are
any
updates
on
the
luna
social
gas
yep
proposal.
I.
C
Sent
it
to
them
over
email,
they
replied
back.
I
can
read
it
or
summarize
it
in
a
second.
C
They
wanted
more
information
about
what
I
mean
when
I
say
the
dxdoubt
community.
So
I
guess
they
just
want
like
numbers,
how
how
big?
We
are,
how
how
many
people
on
our
socials
there
are
how
many
people
like
they
can
expect
from
us
to
like
help,
and
I
guess
how
much
work
would
that
entail,
and
let's
see
they
wanted
some
data
on
omen,
some
information
on
rails.
C
How
would
I
see
copy
trading
working
with
dx
swap
so
my
thinking
was
like
if
you
look
at
the
the
social
platform,
it's
kind
of
like
there's
a
fee
like
any
kind
of
like
any
kind
of
twitter
feed.
Where
you
see
this
such
and
such
guy
leaderboard
guy
did
a
trade
on
finance.
He
left
he
did
a
leverage
trade
of
x,
btc
or
whatever,
and
I
think
that,
since
liquidity
is
moving
over
to
d5
like
having
it
compatible
with
with
the
d5
product,
would
just
be
a
smart
move.
C
C
They
sold
about
400,
000,
aln,
token,
pre-sale
and
they're.
Saying
two
percent
of
their
supply
would
be
about
160,
000
and
they're.
Just
asking
how
I
came
to
that
number
and
they
think
it's
high.
I
don't
think
it's
high.
We
were.
C
We
were
given,
like
obviously
percentage
of
the
dmm
tokens
and
we
haven't
touched
since,
but
and
that,
but
that's
like
that's
like
10
times
the
dollar,
equivalent
of
two
percent
of
aln
tokens
and
like,
if
we're
doing
an
advisory
position
for
them
like
we're,
not
like
one
guy
on
their
website.
We're
like
we're
hundreds
of
ether,
dresses,
dozens
of
active
people
they're
a
dow.
You
know
we're
pretty
much
on
the
edge
of
d5
and
december
governments,
so
they're
getting
a
bunch
of
people
for
a
an
advisory
congregation.
C
I
guess
I
don't
know,
I
could
argue
they
want
to
know
about
overhead
cost
and
like
how
how
I
imagined
being
released.
So
I
I
laid.
C
Ensuring
that
that's
properly
compensated
for,
if
you
know,
even
for
the
guys
on
the
ground
or
one
guy
on
the
ground
or
multiply
multiple
guys
around.
B
F
Yeah
I
mean
I
think,
like
in
terms
of
cross-platform
integration.
We
can
evaluate
that
at
the
technical
level
and
kind
of
see
what
can
fit
into
the
technical
roadmaps
joint
marketing
campaign
stuff
ingomar.
I
trust
you
with
that
and
like
what
makes
sense
there.
I
think
I
hesitate
the
most
around
like
governance
advisory,
like
what
real
capacity
does.
Dx
now
have
to
kind
of
like
get
their
hands
dirty
with
a
luna
governance
right
and,
I
think,
yeah.
F
C
We
have,
I
think,
a
core
of
us
that
are
like
around
12
to
15
people
who
are
kind
of
regularly
regularly
active
but
like
given
like
given
a
person
if
a
person
had
the
responsibility
of
just
being
present
around
their
discord
and
just
reporting
on
what
they're
doing
like,
given
that
they
get
compensated
like
whatever
they
want
like
do.
We
have
someone
who
we
could
delegate
that
sort
of
time
for
that?
I
don't
think
it
would
be
like
a
part-time
job
really.
C
C
B
But
I
mean
I
think,
if
we're
we're
doing
a
product
like
I
want
to
do
good,
product
or
service
and
so,
like,
I
think
you
know
just
providing.
I
think
we
can
provide
like
discord
in
that,
but
I
think
when
we're,
I
guess
I'm
trying
to
get
what's
scalable
in
this,
and
I
don't
think
people
are
very
scalable,
and
so
I'm
trying
to
think
of
like
how
we
build
a
system
or
process
that
could
be
more
more
scalable.
E
I
just
want
to
say
the
way
I
see
this
like
formulating
in,
like
in
actual
dx
style
members.
Voting
in
a
lunar.
Social
governance
is
when
you
have
an
edge
case,
or
you
know,
a
contentious
issue
that
not
a
lot
of
people
agree
on
and
then
kind
of
like
it
escalates,
and
then
more
people
participate
in
governance.
Like
I
mean
this
is
the
highest
percentage
of
participation
rates
is
when
you
have
you
know
a
subject
or
a
proposal
that
people
don't
fully
agree
on.
E
So
I
think
this
is
kind
of
like
the
case
302
of
of
omen,
so
I
think,
like
dig
style
will
actually
like
participate
in
governance.
When
there's
a
big
case
like
that,
where
you
know
not,
everybody
agrees
because
in
most
times
we
won't
need
to
participate
in
the
governance.
I
think.
A
Yeah
this
relates
to
the
the
first
big
example,
which
is
dmg,
which
I
had
a
plan
and
still
have
a
plan
to
like,
and
I've
talked
to
corey
and
I've
been
trying
to
think
about
how
dx
dow
can
get
more
into
it
in
a
scalable
way,
so
that
it
shows
value
to
dmg
community
so
that
other
people
see
that
and
then
they're
like
wow.
It
makes
sense
for
dx
doubt
to
be
involved
in
our
governance,
but
it's
been
moving
kind
of
slow
in
general.
They
haven't
done
that
much
like
and
there
hasn't
been
anything
contentious.
A
We
need
an
example
like
a
good
example,
and
maybe
a
luna
is
that
example,
where
we
actually
show
that
dx
doubt
getting
involved
adds
value,
but
we
don't
even
know
if
that's
true,
like
it's,
never
been
done
right.
A
You
see
a
little
bit
in
compound
where
you
see
like
entities
like
gauntlet
like
getting
involved
in
comp
governance
and
so
that,
because
of
the
delegation
stuff,
there
are
these
entities
that
are
deep
in
the
space.
But
you
don't
see
that
with
another
dow
doing
that
into
another
dow.
I
don't
think
we've
seen
that
right.
B
Yeah,
I
think
the
case
302
is
interesting.
B
It
is
kind
of
a
is
an
interesting
example,
and
I
think
kind
of
shows
that
it's
in
these
times
of,
like
almost
crisis,
where
dick
style
could
be
of
value.
This
is
a
good
yeah.
I
think
this
is
something
we'll
kind
of
continue
to
iterate
on,
and
so
hopefully
we'll
kind
of
hear
more
about
that,
but
I
I
want
to
move
on
so
we
can
keep
going
and
I
want
to
switch
to
the
I
guess
x,
dx
dao.
B
Is
that
what
we
will
call
the
colony
or
the
dxtau
base
that
lives
on
x-die,
but
it
looks
like
it
is
nylon,
the
last
steps.
So
do
you
want
to
kind
of
set
us
up
for
what?
What
the
kind
of
last
steps
are
that
we
can
kind
of
pivot
the
conversation
to
what
we
want
to
do
with
dmx
dao.
E
Yeah,
so
I
guess
the
first
question
would
be
what
to
call
it
and
yeah
I
mean
x.
Dx
dao
is
a
mouthful,
it's
very
difficult
to
to
basically
do
a
drink,
omar's
question
yeah,
so
12
people
mapped
their
reputation,
which
is,
I
don't
know
not
much
but
yeah.
That's
the
state
right
now
at
generate
anyone
who
hasn't
mapped
the
reputation
could
map
it.
After
that
was
deployed.
All
they
need
to
do
is
use
the
same
contract
on
mainnet
and
then
link
that
contract
link.
E
That
transaction
onto
their
proposal
request
on
extend
all
right.
Let's
go
mateo,
I
wanna
I
wanna
deploy
that
dow
on
monday
yeah,
I
guess
maybe
the
first.
We
can
actually
run
a
competition
to
decide.
How
do
we
call
the
the
ex
da
dao
and
that
could
be
like
the
first
thing
that
happens
yeah,
so
I
don't
know
if
people
are
looking
at.
E
Yeah
yeah
yeah,
is
it
working
yeah,
it's
good
yeah.
So
the
way
I
said
this
is
that
it
it
will
be
an
mvp
for
the
xidao.
We
can
start
with
a
few
different
things,
and
these
are
kind
of
the
things
that
I
thought
of
that
we
could
start
with
like
and
they're
fairly
easy.
E
So,
first
of
all
any
xdi
deployment,
for
I
don't
know
omen
or
any
of
those
omen
mesa
or
I
don't
know
any
other
products
might
be
deployed
and
then
possibly
also
curating
the
open
markets,
but
that's
later
another
thing
is
kind
of
like
faster,
cheaper
and
less
secured
out.
That
holds
funds
for
immediate
activities,
so
it's
either
pay
for
bounties
competitions
and
any
ad
hoc
payments.
E
This
could
be
also
incorporated
with
the
budgeting
that
has
been
planned,
and
I
also
wrote
here
a
bit
about
like
a
few
competitions
that
we
can
do
for
the
dx
swap
marketing.
Another
thing
is
just
all
the
signaling
proposals
and
yeah.
You
know
these
type
of
things
that
we're
doing
like.
I
don't
know,
ratification
of
manifesto
and
stuff
like
that.
These
can
all
be
done
on
xdidao
and
then
aggregated
on
a
monthly
basis,
and
then
I
don't
know
for
the
second
iteration.
E
I
think
that
this
could
actually
serve
as
like
an
hr
dow.
If
we
talked
about
people
receiving
money
and
die,
then
this
dow
could
be
funded
for
worker
proposals,
and
you
know
people
could
request
their
worker
proposals
directly
from
the
from
x
die,
it
will
cost
less,
they
will
be
nicer
and
they
will
receive
it
in
a
stable
coin
and
not
exposed
to
eve.
H
Yeah
and
in
general,
like
the
dx
daw
on
x
database,
will
also
serve
as
a
very
good
test
environment
because
we
actually
use
it
in
like
real
use
cases
right
and
with
real
money.
So
it
could
serve
as
like
everything.
What
we
install
on
d8
star
on
main
will
first
go
through
some
like
testing
period
on
on
the
x
day
base.
E
A
A
You
basically
like
the
people
in
that
ecosystem.
That
he's
like.
Okay,
I
take
ether
I
take
die.
He
basically,
then
has
to
say
I
take
x
died
and
most
people
aren't
used
to
that
so
like
if
even
if
we
have
that
pot
of
money
over
there,
the
question
is:
is
there
a
way
to
move
it
in
a
decentralized
way
back
to
maintenance,
to
make
payments
or
do
all
payments
on
next
night
have
to
happen
in
x,
die
on
x,
die
to
the
third
parties
and
stuff.
E
A
Like
let's
say
we
wanted
to
pay
for
the
ought
we
had
a
hundred
thousand
x
die
on
this
now
and
we
wanted
to
pay
the
the
guy
who's
doing
the
audit
yeah.
He
wants
ten
thousand
dollars
right
a
lot
of
those
people
in
the
space,
even
if
they're
in
crypto
space,
he
he's,
probably
he
might
not
accept
x,
die
or
xe
he
may
want.
He
may
want
the
money
on
mainnet
so
that
do
we
are
making
it's
on
x.
Guy
people
like
it
stays
on
x
time.
It's
paid
out
on
x
time.
B
Yeah,
I
wouldn't
imagine
I
would
imagine
that,
like
funding
yeah,
I
think
funding
worker
proposals.
All
of
that
will
still
happen
on
the
main
chain.
I
guess
I
imagine,
there's
probably
like
a
small
amount
of
funds
that
will
be
sent
through
a
trusted
party
basically
2x
die,
but
that
would
be
more
of
like
experimentation
and,
I
think,
like
type
of
work,
maybe
the
the
marketing
campaigns
or
the
bounty-
or
I
guess,
like
contests
or
games
or
something.
B
I
E
E
Yeah
and
like
this
is
the
like:
let's
see
future
worker
proposals
and
all
of
that
stuff,
I
feel
like
that's
like
a
way
down
the
line,
but
generally
next,
I
dao
its
shortcomings.
Right
now
is
that
it
cannot
or
it
can,
but
not
in
a
trustless
way,
interact
with
mainnet
contracts.
So
anything
that's
not
interacting.
With
a
contract
like
distributing
funds,
I
think,
should
slowly
trickle
down
and
just
be
done
there,
which
is
a
lot
of
the
takestar's
actions.
I
think.
B
Yeah-
and
I
think
what
you
laid
out
is-
is
pretty
comprehensive
on
the
type
of
activities
that
we'd
like
to
do
yeah
and
I
think
signaling
proposals
will
probably
be
the
biggest
change
for
what's
being
done
right
now,
because,
obviously
governing
the
dick
style
products
on
next
nextdie
we're
not
doing
that
on
mainnet.
But
I
guess
the
one
question
I
have
is
whether
there
should
be
any
rep
issuance
on
the
xdi,
dick
style
clone.
I
know
there's
some
like
how
do
we
kind
of
realign
them,
but
like?
B
Is
there
a
reason
to
have
any
new
rep
issued
on
xdi.
J
That
that's
an
interesting
point
I
mean
yeah
like
one.
One
point
is
that
you
actually
batch.
H
The
x-style
red
distribution
as
like,
let's
imagine
some
some
dude-
is
actually
working
on
the
extra
base
for
five
months
and
they
each
time
he's
actually
getting
rep
per
month.
So
then,
like
every
every
quarter,
he
actually
just
needs
to
do
like
one
minute.
Rep
update
right.
So
that's
like
it's
just
cost
efficient.
E
Yeah,
like
I
mean
this
is
this-
is
like
not
giving
rep
on
xdi,
that's
a
limitation
that
we
will
have
right.
I
think
that
it
opens
up
to
a
lot
more
possibilities.
If
we
do
give
rep
on
xdi
and
then
you
know
figuring
out
kind
of
retroactively,
how
to
update
both
died
out
and
dick
style.
E
So
I
I
was
actually
thinking
of
I
remember
back
when
I
proposed
it
like
that
all
of
the
parameters
would
be
like
kind
of
cut
in
half
like
all
of
them,
so
the
time
and
yeah
also
the
reputation
of
everyone.
But
I
realized
that
you
know
the
reputation.
E
I
was
thinking
of
doing
like
a
quadratic
formula
on
the
reputation,
so
it's
kind
of
like
more
equal,
but
I
think
this
will
just
complicate
things
and
I
think
that
for
now
we
should
just
start
with
like
a
carbon
copy,
and
then
you
know
later
figure
out
how
to
change
or
how
or
what
to
change
in
these
parameters
and
by
the
way
like
you'll
see
on
the
this
die.
F
E
Yeah,
I
guess
I
guess
so.
I
wrote
here
yeah,
that's
true
to
propo
to
we
need
to
pro
to
transfer
funds
from
dig
style
to
x
dxdo,
so
it's
like
10k
usd
and
then
a
bit
of
gen
as
well
for
it
to.
E
F
E
Oh,
this
is
just
like
as
a
starting
point
I
mean
we
could.
We
could
send
more.
H
H
H
The
rep
is
mostly
done
after
after
the
proposal
is
done
right.
So
at
the
end
of
my
engagement
with
the
dxo
and
yeah
50
of
the
of
my
payment
is
in
combination
with
rep.
That's
true,.
A
So
large
large
payments,
like
I
think
I
think
people
were
thinking
at
first
large,
any
large
payments
stay
on
main
net
right,
it's
safer,
it's
proven
whatever
and
you
start
using
x,
xdi
for
like
smaller
bounties,
some
marketing
stuff
and
you
and
you
see
if
it
even
works.
If
it
doesn't
work
like
we
don't
want
to
start,
we
don't
want
to
do
worker
payments
on
it.
E
Yeah
I
mean
I
don't
see
any
reason
why
it
wouldn't
work,
but
I
would
say
that
yeah
just
to
get
it
going.
I
don't
think
we
should
go
all
in
immediately
and
you
know
start
distributing
salaries
from
there.
If
there
are
people
who
want
to,
then
maybe
we
should.
You
know,
keep
them
in
mind
like
when
we're
transferring
funds.
A
E
F
E
Yeah
and
to
the
question
of
the
reputation,
separation
or
distribution
like
this
could
be
done
like
on
a
quarterly
basis.
Basically,
comparing
these-
and
you
know,
each
person
will
request
the
the
difference
that
they
have
in
each
doubt.
E
No
so
like
this
process
again,
like
the
process
of
taking
money
is
kind
of
manual,
and
you
know
I
will
request
a
proposal
to
send
you
know
whatever
10k
worth
of
eth
to
a
completely
new
address,
and
basically
it
will
be
a
throwaway
address
that
I
will.
I
or
anyone
else
can
basically
change
that
into
die.
Transfer
everything
into
x,
die
and
then
on
to
the
dao.
F
K
Task
here
or
is
it
we
keep
that
that's
the
thing.
Let
me
I
have
two
two
more.
E
Things
quickly,
just
okay,
so
just
summarize
I
mean
the
things
that
I
wrote
down.
It's
kind
of
like
to
add
this
as
a
testile,
and
we
are
doing
rep
issuance
on
x,
die
we'll
start
with
10k
for
now
or
does
geronimo
think
that
we
should
increase
it
to
25..
E
We
can,
you
know,
figure
that
out
as
well
and
yeah.
It's
like
everything
other
than
that.
Okay,
with
you
guys.
F
E
F
Mean
it's
pretty
safe.
I
think
if
it's
like,
you
know,
on
the
order
of
worker
proposal,
right,
like
I'd,
have
to
be
an
idiot
to
like
screw
everything
up
yeah
to.
B
The
ease
of
the
multisig
now
all
right,
I'm
going
to
steal
the
screen
for
just
a
minute.
I
don't
want
to
talk
too
much
about
this,
but
I
want
to.
I
think
we
need
to
start
thinking
about
what
this
dxd
guild
could
potentially
look
like.
I
know
we've
been
working
on
this
on
the
technical
front,
but
there's
a
lot
of
kind
of
logistics
in
in
decisions
that
would
need
to
be
made
by
the
community
kind
of
just
to
lay
out
a
couple.
Rep
logistics.
B
The
guild
has
a
set
amount
of
rep.
Is
that
kind
of
increasing
or
decreasing?
Obviously,
the
big
question:
how
much
three
is
the
dxd
vote,
split
represented
in
the
rep
vote,
so,
for
instance,
if,
like
60
of
dxd
voters,
vote
for
something
and
40,
but
against?
Is
that
the
same
makeup
that
would
be
in
the
rep
rep
tally?
Or
would
that
be
like
a
hundred
percent
dxd
a
hundred
percent?
Yes,
because
that
was
the
side
that
actually
won
the
dxt
guild
vote
kind
of
fourth
quorum?
B
Is
there
like
a
minimum
amount
of
dxd
that
needs
to
participate
in
this
or
does
the
participation
rate
of
dxd
holders
in
the
vote
affect
the
rep
balance
right
and
then
obviously
things
like
portal
for
this?
So
I
don't
think
we
have
questions
like
obviously
no
really
answers
to
any
of
these,
but
I
think
like
they're,
you
know
as
it
moves
away
from
the
kind
of
theoretical
and
there's
some
technical
implementation
of
this.
B
I
think
this
is
what
the
block
rocket
guys
have
been
working
on
we're
going
to
have
to
start
trying
to
address
some
of
these
thornier.
G
By
the
dao
itself,
so
that
can
be
that
can
be
changed.
Ideally,
we
will
start
with
a
very
with
a
low
amount
of
rep,
just
to
start
experimenting
how
the
gear
will
work.
Talking
about
the
how
the
boat
from
the
gill
will
be
sent
to
the
exile,
it
can
be
a
representative
amount
of,
for
example,
if
if,
if
the
majority
of
the
guild
bought
four
years
or
no,
we
can
send
how
much
of
that
maturity
representing
the
how
much
of
that
maturity
vote
for
a
positive
or
negative
decision.
G
Let's
say
that
60
70
for
75
percent
of
the
gear,
both
four
years
on
a
specific
proposal
and
the
guild
has
a
hundred
a
hundred
rep
italian
ball
for
it
combo
on
the
on
75
rep.
For
yes,
that
that's
something
that
can
be
done,
we
cannot
vote
in.
I
think
correct
me.
I
don't
care
about.
I
think
we
cannot
issue
two
votes
or
one
of
each.
For
example,
we
cannot
say
75
on
yes
and
25,
and
now
we
can
only
vote
once
on
the
on
the
dow
level.
G
E
Yeah
to
your
question:
I'm
not
entirely
sure
this
is
like
an
interesting
question,
but
yeah
I
mean
like
what
you
propose
makes
sense.
G
So
but
yeah,
that
is
how
that
would
work
with.
We
will
create
the
gear
the
gear
will
be
attached
to
the
to
the
dfc
token.
You
will
need
to
lock
tokens
in
order
to
vote,
and
if
you
have
a
tokens
log
at
the
moment
of
the
pro
when
the
proposal
was
created,
you
are
eligible
to
vote.
G
So
the
and
the
percentage
that
we
are
going
to
take
in
count
for
that
of
the
of
the
direct
guild
is,
for
example,
if
only
a
thousand
tokens
are
locked
on
the
exit
yield
and
that's
enough
in
the
configuration
of
the
give
to
start
creating
proposals
if
600
log
tokens
vote
for.
Yes,
that
means
that
50
of
the
posts
of
that
proposal
will
will
be
able
to
issue
a
60
vote
of
approval
for
a.
B
Cool
yeah:
it
should
be
exciting
and
kind
of
interested
to
see
how
we
kind
of
move
forward
and
I
wasn't
sure,
the
guys
from
delphi
I
think
anil
and
jill
may
be
on
the
call.
They
were
hey
guys.
I
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
yeah,
we
have
a
call
in
two
minutes,
but
I
just
I
told
him
that
we'd
be
a
little
bit
late,
but
yeah
we
basically
just
published
our.
You
know
full
three
proposals
on
dow
talk.
I
I
think
when
I
initially
posted
it,
the
link
that
I
shared.
Unfortunately,
people
had
a
request
for
access,
so
I
just
posted
another
link
there.
I
If
you
guys
wanted
to
go
check
that
out,
we'll
definitely
be
on
the
call
tomorrow
to
you
know,
answer
questions,
and
you
know
actually
have
more
time
than
these
in
the
next
few
minutes,
but
just
wanted
to
flag
that,
for
you
guys,
we'd
already
shared
our
governance
piece
of
the
proposal
earlier
this
month
and
you
know
presented
that
on
the
governance
call,
I
think,
there's
a
good
video
that
chris
actually
uploaded
that
can
go
through
that.
I
But
the
two
other
changes
that
we
also
were
proposing
were
more
so
focused
on
the
bonding
curve
and
then
three-
and
this
is
kind
of
relevant
kind
of
discussions
being
happening
right
now
around
the
ui
ux
and
we
basically
wanted
to
see,
especially
with
the
five-point
plan
kind
of
passing,
and
you
know
us
thinking
the
next
steps
forward.
We
thought
it'd
be
good.
Really,
you
know
take
a
step
back
and
think
before
we
start
commissioning
people
to
build
out.
I
D
Yeah
yeah,
and
just
this
is
a
medium
just
to
add
to
that
out
of
the
three
parts.
The
proposal
I
think
actually
like
low-key,
the
like
aggregated
ui,
is
probably
my
favorite
part,
because
you
know,
I
think
one
thing
that
we've
seen
in
this
space
right
now
is
aggregators
are
just
becoming
like
increasingly
important,
and
it
only
makes
sense
that
you
would
you
know
kind
of
aggregate.
D
The
x
dial
zone
ecosystem
on
one
page
could
help
discoverability
between
different
products
and
could
also
make
it
easier
to
kind
of
sign
up,
become
a
member
engage
with
that
discussion
as
well.
So
really
creating
like
a
one-stop
shop
portal
for
dx
doubt
could
be,
could
be
really
beneficial
and
even
I
know
the
other
day
you
guys
kind
of
like
released
a
sneak
peek
of
the
rails
ui.
You
know
the
first
thought
I
had
when
I
saw
that
was
wow.
D
This
would
be
a
great
component
on
just
like
a
dx-style
portal,
because
you
know
you
you
come
there
to
you
know
place
a
you
know
place
a
bet
on
omen.
You
you
stay
to
send
a
payment
on
rails,
and
then
you
know
right
on
that
page
as
well.
You
can
become
a
member
of
the
community,
get
engaged
in
governance
and
discussions
there.
So
you
know
really
just
pulling
it
all.
Together
could
probably
be
one
of
the
I
think
most
impactful
things.
We
could
do
near
term
to
really
to
really
get
the
ball
rolling.
D
F
Yeah,
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
have
some
time
carved
out
for
tomorrow's
call.
So
I
can
we
can
coordinate
exactly
when
if
you
guys
are
constrained
but
yeah.
I
think
it's
a
lot
of
people
in
the
community
be
interested
in
it,
and
this
gives
people
a
day
to
kind
of
digest
it,
and
we
can
kind
of
try
to
at
least
recap
it
tomorrow
and
have
you
guys
present
a
little
bit.
I
That
sounds
good
guys.
We
actually
have
to
jump
right
now
and
for
tomorrow's
call.
We
actually
have
our
calendars
are
honestly
a
mess.
Always
we
have
a
call
at
11
30
too,
so
we
hope
it
it'd
be
okay.
If
we
could,
you
know
kind
of
take
up
some
of
the
first
portion
of
the
call
tomorrow,
but
if
not
totally
understand-
and
you
know
we
can
join-
maybe
monday's
call
as
well
but
yeah.
I
Looking
forward
to
hearing
your
thoughts
and
yeah,
the
links
are
on
the
dow
talk
forum
and
I
think
mj
is
actually
gonna
upload
the
model
in
the
next.
You
know
30
40
minutes.
B
Awesome-
and
I
think
we
have
the
recording,
we'll
probably
soon
cut
out
as
we
come
up
on
the
hour.
Any
last
comments,
thoughts,
things
to
to
flag.
C
One
quick
thing:
I
think,
about
a
lot
of
like
deep
eye
app
websites
that
immediately
like
asked
to
connect
to
your
metamask,
and
I
don't
know
if
that
would
be
like
too
aggressive
for
the
dxdow
home
page.
And
I
guess
you
can't
like
connect
it
to
multiple
of
dx
dallas
applications
right,
because
if,
if
I
guess,
if
there's
no
way
to
do
that,
it's
on
board.
A
B
Yeah
because
I
just
remembered
the
whole
forbes
thing
it
was
like
six
or
nine
months
ago.
I
just
like,
went
to
some
random
article
on
forbes
and
suddenly,
like
my
metamask
thing
popped
up
and
like
they
hadn't
even
come
out
with
the
program,
they
didn't
even
announce
the
program
that
they
think
they
were
doing
with
like
the
unlocked
protocol,
and
it
was
just
like
why
are
you
trying
to
access
my
metamask
forbes.
E
I
would
say
that
I
recently,
like
I,
I've,
been
showcasing
like
just
ethereum
stuff
to
non-crypto
people
and
they're
like.
Why
do
why
do
I
have
to
click
there
like
what
it
doesn't
make
sense
for
me
to
connect
my
wall?
Why
would
I
just
connect
to
my
wallet
and
you
know,
obviously
the
whole
transaction
thing?
Okay,
now
you
know
click
here
submit
and
then
like
okay.
What
is
this
thing
that
pops
up
like?
F
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
we
should
talk
about
all
this
stuff
like
that.
Maybe
the
next
dev
or
some
product
call,
because
I
think
you
can
get
kind
of
in
depth
here
on
what
the
product
direction
is
or
even
just
excuse
me
if
we're
talking
about
like
that
dashboard,
we
maybe
need
to
step
back
and
just
do
some
strategy,
brainstorming
and
think
about
where,
where
we're
going
in
general
nylon.