►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting[2020-12-16] Part 1 of 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
the
december
16th
2020
dx,
dow
governance,
discussion
and
happy
20k
bitcoin
to
start
with
just
going
over
what
kind
of
the
agenda
for
today
that's
posted
in
the
hackmd
governance,
1.0
stuff,
going
over
the
rep
boost
and
then
there's
a
bunch
of
proposals,
a
lot
of
worker
proposals
and
also
some
ens
updates
and
then
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
bonding
curve
proposal
that
is
now
boosted
and
can
be
voted
on
and
then
on
the
governance.
One
point
x:
front:
xdi,
dx,
dow.
B
There
is
currently
a
community
competition
for
roman
markets.
Now
I
think,
there's
14
missions
so
be
good
to
get
an
update
on
that
and
then.
Lastly,
in
the
governance
2.0
front,
we
had
a
pretty
good
call
long
call
yesterday,
but
it
was
kind
of
exciting
to
go
through
a
couple,
different
options
for
for
kind
of
the
solutions
that
may
emerge,
and
so
it'd
be
good
to
get
a
little
bit
of
a
recap
on
that
there,
starting
to
starting
first,
the
community
rep
boost.
B
I
posted
a
forum
post
this
morning
as
a
reminder.
This
is
something
I
think
this
is
the
third
month.
We've
been
doing
it,
I
think
september
or
yes,
the
third
month
we've
been
doing
it
just
as
a
way
to
kind
of
engage,
different
community
members,
I
nominated
two
people
or
I
could
think
of
christopher
who's,
been
a
a
tireless
worker.
B
I
really
think
of
the
last
month,
kind
of
get
triggered
a
whole
bunch
of
different
areas
and
larae
who
had
done
some
kind
of
partnership,
work
with
status,
prime
down
and
deep
down.
So
I
think
those
are
people
that
have
been
engaged
in
the
community
and
maybe
some
rep
and
I
saw
corkus
and
zett
also
had
some
of
those
too.
B
So
it's
a
reminder
we're
trying
to
get
people
to
submit
the
proposal
themselves
so
that
it
is
a
way
to
actually
get
familiar
with
the
proposal
and
also
earn
a
little
bit
of
rap,
because
you
get
a
small
rep
reward
for
past
proposal.
So
we'll
try
to
do
submissions
on
that
forum
and
then
make
sure
that
we
get
those
people
that
that
are
there.
B
D
Oh,
I
was
just
going
to
say:
I'm
not
sure
the
last
round
has
been
completed,
because
only
one
or
two
people
have
done
it
themselves.
The
first
round
the
first
two
rounds
that
we
did.
You
know
we
get
in
contact
with
the
person.
All
we
get.
We
ask
them
for
their
consent,
but
not
formally
like
you're
saying
we
say
you
have
a
wallet
address
that
you
want
to
use
for
your
rep
and
then
we
gave
them
the
rep.
D
The
dow
gave
them
the
rep
and
put
it
into
their
wallet,
and
that
was
more
successful
because
everyone
got
their
rep,
whether
they're
using
it
is
another.
I
don't
know.
I
guess
interesting
to
look
at
is
like
how
many
people
use
rep,
that
they
get
in
rep
boost
right,
but
I
see
what
you're
saying
about
making
people
do
it
themselves,
however,
that
hasn't
that
doesn't
have
a
high
percentage
of
distribution
at
this
point,
so
yeah.
C
Not
to
say
that,
like
we
want
to
make
it
difficult,
this
is
there
needs
to
be
some
kind
of
like
acknowledgement
or
yeah
I
mean.
Maybe
we
could
even
think
about
having
links
to
the
alchemy
proposal
itself
within.
Like
dow
talk,
because
I
know
you
can
create
links
to
at
least
the
new
proposal
page,
and
maybe
we
could
even
get
a
little
fancier
and
like
pre-populate,
some
of
the
the
text
fields
there.
B
Yeah-
and
I
think
we
should
be
very
okay
with
hand-holding
here-
I
like
kind
of
submitting
the
like
them
submitting
the
proposal,
but
then
like
doing
as
much
handholding
and
encouraging
as
we
can
for
the
last
month's
recipients.
I
think
we
should
just
like
re-engage
them
again
under
the
same
kind
of
pretenses
that
we're
doing
here,
and
I
I
would
imagine
that
they
like
we
could
hopefully
get
some
of
them
to
try
to
come
come
along.
I
know,
there's
two
people
or
one
one
person.
D
Yeah
it
it
part
of
it,
comes
down
to,
and
I've
been
in
touch
with
some
people
that,
like
they
do
rep
from
some
action
in
the
past,
whether
it's
a
rep
boost
or
whether
or
not
they
did
the
bitcoin
grant
a
long
time
ago
or
whatever,
and
they
just
didn't,
didn't,
claim
the
rep,
and
at
this
point
they
clearly
don't
value
having
the
rep
like
it's
not
worth
their
time,
it's
not
worth
the
five
minutes
it
takes.
So
it's.
C
Also,
it's
also
like
twenty
dollars
in
gas
at
this
point
exactly
the
proposal
so
yeah
without
working.
D
Well,
they
get
refunded
most
of
it,
but
but
that's
why
some
like
interesting
thing
like
if
you
have
rep
and
you
govern.
If
you
govern
well
with
your
rep,
you
can
earn
some
incentive.
D
I
feel
like
if
that
was
in
place,
and
that
would
that
could
spur
people
to
then
actually
care
about
getting
their
reps
and
then
governing
with
it.
E
C
And
something
else
I've
heard
is
feedback
too,
is
just
like
if
it's
just
people
feeling
like
they
don't
have
any
influence
over
the
boats
right.
If
they
have
a
small
percentage
of
rep,
then
you
know,
I
mean
I've
heard
that
feedback
from
people
who
have
like
small
amounts
of
rep
like
under
one
percent
being
like
well.
Why
do
I?
Why
should
I
bother
coding
on
these
things
or
like
what
you
know
doesn't
really
feel
like
it's
worth
it,
especially
with
the
gas
costs
and
stuff
so.
B
Yeah,
I
think
these
are
all
good
points
and
kind
of
part
of
the
broader
discussion
on
participation
and
and
engagement
and
rep
distribution,
and
I
think
that
we
have
a
lot
to
work
on
in
that,
but
I
do
think
the
community
rep
boosts
are
like
the
one
of
the
things
that's
in
this
step
in
that
direction.
So
we
should,
I
think,
try
to
build
off
of
that
with
all
of
these
other
things.
But
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
do.
I
think
on
on
really
rep
distribution.
F
Yeah,
like
another
interesting
aspect,
is
the
x-type
base
like
if
those
people
actually
really
are
just
like
worried
about
the
20
bucks,
which
it
still
indeed
is
like
crazy,
20
bucks
for
like
getting
0.1
rep
like
we
have
an
alternative.
F
The
base
is
like
being
built
right
now,
and
they
can
also
be
part
of
like
the
x-style
world
if
they
want
so
like
if
the
transaction
costs
are
the
issue,
the
exci
base
is
something
like
at
the
end
of
the
day.
They
can
request
both
both
worlds
right,
but
if
the
transaction
cost
the
issue,
they
could
start
on
next
day.
F
And
like
in
general,
in
someone
who
who
cares
about
like
as
less
barriers
as
possible
at
some
point,
we
should
think
about
like
like
a
link
where
people
just
go
and
press
a
button
right
and
just
request.
It.
B
Okay,
let's
move
to
the
forum,
I
mean
proposal
roundup
and
different
proposals.
There
are
a
couple
different
worker
proposals
in
the
queue
nothing
too
exciting
on
those.
There
is
a
new
worker
proposal
from
pulp
there
that
I
think
is
appeared
there
after
initial,
maybe
not
appearing,
but
I
think
that
was
just
a
subgraph
issue.
If
that's
correct,
I
don't
know
but
yeah
and
then
so
I
don't
have
any
discussion
on
those
and
then
there's
a
couple
different,
the
ens
ones.
B
So
yeah,
I
think
the
swapper
one
is
probably
the
most
relevant
one
and
that
is
now
boosted.
So
that
means
that
it
is
set.
That's
the
cl.
The
three
day
clock
starts
on
that.
So
that
will
be,
I
think,
saturday
more
early
morning,
new
york
time,
maybe
like
three
or
four
a.m.
That
time
will
presumably
be
ready
to
will
pass
and
then
it
will
need
to,
I
think,
execute
before
it's
actually
that
that's
launched
on
swapper.eth,
so
any
kind
of
thoughts
or
questions
on
on
that
proposal.
G
B
C
Yet
yeah
it's
only.
C
Only
been
boosted
for
a
few
hours
now
I
think
so
I
intend
to
vote
on
it.
Hopefully
the
gas
prices
will
come
down
from
100
yeah.
B
B
Evening
and
gas
prices
have
changed
because
I
used
to
find
like
I
could
do
it
in
the
morning.
It'd
be
low
enough,
but
like
the
last
couple
days,
this
also
happened
on
like
another
swapper
thing
in
terms
of
liquidity,
gas
prices
just
skyrocketed,
but
anyway.
I
think
this
is
obviously
like
a
pretty
exciting
moment
for
geek
style
for
swapper.
B
There's
already
been
some
semi-significant
trading
volume
on
swapper
there's
about
a
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
dollars
worth
of
dxd
and
eth
in
the
dxd
pool
and
there's
been,
I
think
yesterday
there
was
about
sixty
five
thousand
dollars
of
trade
volume
on
that
which
is
interesting,
of
course,
because
there's
no
like
the
front
end
isn't
up.
So
presumably
this
is
just
bots
combing,
the
plot
blockchain
for
our
opportunities
and
the
the
big
movements
of
dxd
and
heath,
definitely
kind
of
contribute
to
some
of
that
volume.
B
C
Development
yeah
there's.
Definitely
it's
definitely
armed
I've
seen
or
bought
it,
because
I've
seen
even
just
like
deploy,
I
mean
depositing
liquidity
on
it.
You
see
you
get
front
running
stuff
if
it's
slightly
off
on
the
price,
but
that's
good.
I
mean
there's
fees
generated
from
that
when
things
move
on
other
markets,
and
so
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
overall
a
good
thing.
It
keeps
the
prices
in
line
so
that
you
know
things
are
correct
in
terms
of
being
close
to
market
price.
C
Something
else
to
note
is
we
are
pretty
close
now
to
making.
I
think
the
the
smart
contracts
are
ready
for
the
gnosis
protocol
relay
that's
relevant
to
swapper,
because
that'll
allow
us
to
make
trains
from
the
treasury
for
something
like
stable
coins
or
tbtc
or
whatever
is
decided,
and
that
would
be
necessary
before
adding
any
liquidity
from
the
treasury
right
and
that
relayer
is
also
ready
to
go
so
those
relayers
are
ready.
We
just
need
to
make
proposals
to
add
the
plug-ins.
C
I
don't
know
if
nico
has
anything
to
say
to
that,
but
when
yeah,
when
we
get
to
that
point,
the
plug-in
proposals
take
like
three
weeks
if
they're
only
boosted.
So
this
is
something
we
should.
C
I
think
trying
to
push
on
is
to
try
to
get
greater
than
50
and
try
to
pass
those
proposals
by
absolute
majority.
So
we
can
shorten
that
timeline.
So
there
are
two.
C
If
we're
I'm
a
little,
not
completely
sure
if
we're
gonna
go
with
the
multi-call
or
with
two
separate
generic
plugins
for
each
one,
but
it's
either
gonna
be
one
or
for
both
of
them
at
once
or
two
individually,
but
either
way
that
would
you
know
it
would
take
at
least
three
three
weeks.
I
think
to
do
the
boosted
version
of
those.
B
Yeah,
I
think
that's
an
opportunity
to
try
to
get
to
with
the
votes.
I
think
I'd
like
to.
I
know
nico.
We
can
kind
of
maybe
work
on
that
proposal
to
see
if
we
can
position
that
to
try
to
get
above,
50,
probably
and
so
just
to
kind
of
the
timeline
on
this.
So
this
is
swapper
beta
swapper
alpha
will
be
the
next
release,
which
will
be
dx
style
liquidity
with
some
farming,
and
that
will
be
sometime
in
mid-january.
B
So
right
now,
we'll
kind
of
we'll
be
discussing
these
items.
You
can
discuss
more
on
the
friday
product
strategy
meeting
and
then
presumably
have
some
type
of
proposal
on
the
liquidity
and
farming
things
that
will
come
back
to
governance
over
the
next
couple
weeks.
B
Cool-
and
there
was
also
a
proposal
just
a
minute-
I
think
yesterday-
to
update
the
dx
dow
landing
page.
I
know
violence
done
a
lot
of
work
on
this
and
there's
kind
of
some
updates
to
a
lot
of
different
things
that
we
added
to
the
the
site
and
also
a
lot
of
the
text,
and
so
that
will
time
well
with
the
swapper
release,
because
it
will
include
swapper
as
a
product
there.
B
F
Yeah,
like
I
think
in
terms
of
thinking
about
the
product,
dx
stats
needs
to
be
going
online
as
quickly
as
possible.
Yeah
so
know
the
state
of
the
extent.
H
Yep,
I
can
short
update
on
that.
So
there
has
been
some
known
issues
with
incorrect
price
information
about
some
of
the
repairs
and
liquidity
and
we
pushed
an
update
to
ipfs
yesterday,
which
is
ready
for
review.
So
anyone
who
could
take
the
time
to
review
it
highly
appreciate
it.
I
will
share
it
in
the
public
swap
channel
as
well
and
as
soon
as
we
get
the
go,
we
can
prepare
the
proposal
there.
B
And
deep
style
already
has
the
smdx
stats
to
eat,
and
I
guess
like
I
guess
this
is
the
same
they're
doing
with
swapper
it'll
be
the
first
time
using
like
the
the
ens,
the
cns
name
from
geek
style,
but
that'll
just
go
under
the
same
scheme
or
plug-in
that
already
exists.
B
Cool
and
then
there
were
two
other
market
curation
batch
proposals
and
just
kind
of
wanted
to
flag
these,
because
I
think
this
is
you
know
kind
of
the
the
consistent
governance
that
we
need
to
be
doing
like
there
is
some
curation
going
on
to
omen
and
providing
valid
markets
and
kind
of
curating.
That
is
an
important
component,
and
so
there
are
the
batch
number
eight
and
nine
on
that.
That's
going
on
now
voting
on
those
proposals.
D
Cool
and
then
there's,
I
guess
with
that,
with
the
new
format,
on
an
alchemy
that
ezra
had
presented
to
the
group
where,
like
you
see
all
the
like
the
new
homepage,
where
you
see
all
the
proposals
kind
of
all
in
one
easy
view,
I
think
that
will
probably
help
with
more
active
voting
participation
on
like
the
one,
the
other
types
of
proposals
that
are
not
like
the
funding
and
voting
proposals
or
whatever,
so
these
curation
ones
and
then
plug-ins
and
stuff
will
get
bro.
D
Because
right
now
you
have
to
like
dig
down
deep
into
alchemy,
to
find
those
to
then
even
decide
whether
to
vote
on
them.
And
if
they're
presented
to
you
on
your
front
page,
you
will
be
more
likely
to
vote
on
them.
So
I
think
that
is
an
important
step
to
like
bring
the
other
random
types
of
proposals
to
the
forefront
for,
like
the
average
voter.
B
Yeah,
and
even
you
know,
I
I've
been
trying
to
just
you-
know,
look
at
proposals
and
read
up
and
engage,
and
so
those
you
know
a
lot
of
times,
I'm
like
not
aware
that
they
like
pop
up
or
I'm
not
really
sure
or
at
first
glance,
I'm
not
really
sure
what
they're
doing
and
then
I
you
know,
there's
a
spreadsheet
and
everything
I
do
think
we
need
to
like
figure
out
some
additional
communication
channel
for
proposals.
B
I
don't
know
if
this
is
like
a
key
base
channel
that
is
just
kind
of
like
if
we
could
have
a
proposal
submitted
bot
or
something
I've
been
trying
to
do
that,
a
little
bit
more
on
this
call.
But
just
there
are
a
lot
of
like
proposals,
and
I
know
that
there
are
comments
on
the
bottom
of
it,
but
like
how
do
we
have
some
type
of
communication
that
we're
following
more
closely
with
the
proposals.
A
Just
one
addition
like
there
are
not
no
comments
there
anymore
below
the
proposals.
I
noticed
that,
like
you,
can't
add
comments
anymore.
There
is
not
detection.
H
D
Related
to
the
proposal,
I
guess
funnel
one
example.
We
have
right
now
because
it's
a
lot
of
times
people
make
a
forum
post
about
their
proposal
before
they
make
the
proposal
and
in
the
with
api
three.
We
have
an
example
where
there
was
a
forum
post.
So
this
is
governance
related,
but
it's
biz
dev
too.
We
have
a
process
now,
but
basically
there
was
a
forum
post.
B
I
mean
you
could
argue
that
the
boost
period
is
supposed
to
fill,
that
role
right,
that
you
submit
a
proposal
and
it
just
sits
there
and
then
you
go
to
the
forum,
and
you
say
I
just
finished
this
proposal.
It's
there
vote
on
it.
If
you
feel
strongly
it's
not
boosted
yet
and
then
like
when
you
get
to
the
boosted
when
someone
feels
confident
enough
to
boost
it.
B
That
means
they
think
that,
like
it'll,
get
a
up
or
down
vote
in
a
certain
direction
yeah
and
that
yeah
you
know,
and
then
that's
when
you
maybe
does
enter
that
next
level,
but
yeah
I
mean,
I
think,
the
thinking
about
the
way
that
again
it's
like
differentiating
between
proposals.
B
I
also
think
signaling,
like
it's
just
signaling
broad
and
it's
like
kind
of
it's
connected
to
reputation
but,
for
instance
like
in
the
omen
like
market
curation,
bats
batches
like
if
someone
I
I
look
at
who
submits
those
and
then,
if,
like
someone,
tells
me
like
if
geronimo
or
you
tells
me
like-
you
should
vote
on
this-
then
I'm
gonna
vote
on
this,
because
I
can
trust
you
guys
and
that's
fine
right.
B
If
I
know
that
you're
submitting
that
proposal
or
you're
telling
me
that-
and
I
think
those
type
of
like
signals
right
on
different
proposals
from
you
know,
members
that
have
given
it
a
closer
thought
and
yes
we're
relying
on
there's
a
little
bit
of
trust
there.
But
I
think
that
that's
that's
all
part
of
the
the
process.
J
F
F
That's
like
a
very
important
point,
like
we
have
those
squats
and,
like
I
think
in
general.
The
omen
squad
needs
to
make
sure
that
the
omen
proposals
are
like,
checked,
verified
and
like.
If
someone
has
a
question,
the
almond
squad
should
be
able
to
be
available
and
to
answer
any
question
right,
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
those
proposals,
like
the
market
curation
proposal-
I
mean
they
are
so
cryptid
like
just
market
addresses-
are
like.
F
We
need
to
make
sure
that
we
do
like
they're
like
as
easy
as
possible,
verifiable,
which
means
we
need
to
provide
like
those
links
to
those
markets.
So
people
can
just
click
on
those
links
and
check
the
markets
themselves.
B
F
And
like
I
see
that
with
swapper
like
I
do,
I
do
some
verification,
I'm
not
like
deep
into
solidity
and
deployment
verification.
So
I'm
like
kind
of
waiting
for
the
swapper
team
to
like
give
me
some
signal
that
it
is
legit
and
until
now
there's
no
signal
and
I'm
just
waiting.
C
But
we
do,
we
should
think
about
how
to
remove
trust
like
in
the
bigger
picture
here
right.
Like
I
mean
this
is
the
operational
reality
of
today,
but
we
got
to
remember
that
the
goal
is
to
like
make
this
decentralized
and
autonomous,
and
we
don't
really
want
to
be
in
situations
where
we're
relying
on
individuals
to
to
like
signal
something
right
like.
B
That's
too
much
it'll
be
like
brands
of
something
right,
like
people
will
look
at
something
as
signal
and
indicators
right
and
that
may
not
be
like
individuals.
It'll
be
like
you
know,
but
there
will
be
ways
to
evaluate
these
things
and
just
thinking
about
like
what
are
those
signals
or
just
encouraging
more
signals.
E
One
thing
that
I've
been
wondering
about
is
especially
with
the
worker
proposals
is,
and
maybe
this
isn't
going
to
solve
it
or
not,
but
obviously,
like
kind
of
signaling,
someone
from
your
squad,
you
know
boosting
your
work
or
proposal.
You
know
once
things
are
going,
is
a
very
nice
way
to
do
it,
but
if
we
also
do
budgets
eventually,
you
know
for
quarters,
and
that
would
include
you
know
budgets
for
workers
and
you
reference.
You
know.
E
I'm
posting
my
worker
proposal
in
reference
to
this
budget,
so
there's
some
sort
of
contact
there
of
like
yeah
we've
already
amongst
the
squad,
communicated
amongst
one
another
that
we
want
you
to
work
for
us,
and
you
know
your
work's
good
and
you're
part
of
the
budget.
Things
like
that
could
kind
of
help
out
a
little
bit
just
the
more
organized
it
is.
B
Definitely
cool,
and
there
is
another
exciting
proposal.
I
don't
know
if
exciting
is
the
right
word,
but
there
is
another
proposal
that
has
been
boosted
just
started
and
that
is
to
immediately
halt
the
bonding
curve.
I
think
it
was
immediately
so
this
is,
I
believe,
posted
by
chris
p.
Who's
been
active
in
the
telegram,
and
so
I
mean
the
bonding
curve
has
been
extremely
hot
topic
of
debate
for
a
long
time.
B
We
had
a
pretty
heat,
a
pretty
long
debate
in
august
and
early
september
on
this,
as
it
was
be,
as
a
lot
of
the
fundraising
was
happening
as
they
were
going
in
there.
We
ended
up
not
deciding.
B
There
was
a
signal
proposal
that
failed
to
halt
the
bonding
curve
in
early
september,
and
so
this
would
be
another
signal
proposal
that
would,
I
think,
kind
of
prioritize
where
we
should
be
focusing
and
developing
our
our
time
on
and-
and
it
doesn't
necessarily
come
with
any
specifics
or
code
to
execute
it
doesn't
actually
halt
the
bonding
group
itself.
It
would
more
be
like
a
signal
that
the
collective
should
act
in
this
way.
B
C
I
have
some
some
thoughts
on
yeah,
so
this
had
been
a
a
hot
topic
in
the
fall
or
beginning
of
the
fall,
and
as
part
of
that
you
know
there
was
a
proposal
to
halt
it
that
actually
didn't
get
boosted.
Actually,
if
I
remember
correctly,
I
think
chris,
who
made
this
proposal,
actually
ended
up
down,
boosting
that
one.
I
think
you
know
after
having
some
discussions,
I
think
maybe
it
was
with
acousto.
C
He
like
you,
know,
thought
it
was
better
to
wait
and-
and
you
know,
I
think
my
thinking
at
that
time
was
the
bonding
curve
plays
a
pretty
serious
role.
It's.
It
is
literally
the
token
contract.
It's
got
2500
in
the
buyback
reserve.
It
serves,
as
the
you
know,
distribution
of
revenue
to
dxd
holders,
as
well
as
the
mechanism
for
fundraising,
and
so
I
felt
like
it.
C
You
know
that,
like
there
weren't
just
people
creating
a
stir
about
it,
so
that
they
could
pump
the
price-
and
I
was
you
know
I
sort
of
felt
like
that-
would
be
an
unhealthy
dynamic
to
kind
of
respond
to,
and
then
we
did
the
five-point
plan
which
passed
and
one
of
the
points
of
that
was
to
kind
of
create,
like
a
research
group,
to
look
at
the
curve
and
and
like
figure
out
what
was
going
on
the
timeline
that
was
suggested
in
that
five-point
plan
was
two
months
right.
C
So
it's
been
in
two
months,
so
we
haven't
even
really
started
the
five-point
plan.
I
don't
think
that's
anybody's
fault,
like
we've,
been
quite
busy
with
the
products
and
figuring
out
the
governance
2.0
stuff,
which
is
probably
more
complicated
and
more
kind
of
an
existential
thing
anyway.
So
I
mean,
I
think
at
this
point,
since
we
haven't
really
formulated
a
plan
on
what
to
do
to
adapt
it
like.
C
I
have
no
problem,
I
support
the
idea
of
just
stopping
it
until
you
know
we
come
back
around
and
actually
can't
give
some
attention
to
how
to
upgrade
the
curve
to
something
new.
F
Yeah
so
my
view
on
this
is
already
like
if
two
months
ago
it
was
just
a
handful
of
pumpers
and
that's
just
like
my
gut
feeling,
like
maybe
that's
the
main
issue.
F
I
don't
know
if
dxc
holders
really
want
to
stop
the
bonding
curve,
and
two
months
ago
there
were
a
handful
of
pumpers
who
wanted
to
push
this
like
propaganda
or
like
just
the
strategy
to
actually
hold
the
bonding
curve
and
right
now
it's
just
one
dude
and
that's
I
like
that's
something
on
on
our
side
that
we
like
didn't,
make
sure
or
even
like,
had
a
strategy
to
actually
really
ask
the
dxd
holders,
because
we
don't
know
if,
like
I
don't
even
know,
if
chris
has
any
dxd.
C
Right,
like
I,
I
agree
with
that
that,
like
it,
would
be
much
better
to
have
like
an
actual
txt
guild
and
just
to
address
that
kind
of
technically
where
we
are
timeline
was
with
that.
You
know
the
gusto
has
pretty
much
wrapped
up
the
erc20
guilds
and
it's
like
in
our
auditing
queue
and
should
be
audited
in
january.
So,
like
you
know,
hopefully
we
we
can
launch
some
txt
guild
in
like
february.
C
If
things
go
well
now
I
know
I
know
I
mean
chris
seems
to
be
the
only
one
really
making
noise
at
this
point
about
it,
but
I
know
for
sure
it's
more
than
just
one
dxd
holder
that
that
feels.
That
way
I
mean
I
actually
just
did
an
interview
with
tristan
from
ftx
podcast
and
he
one
of
the
questions
he
asked
me
on
that
interview,
which,
hopefully,
I
think
should
be
going
being
published
within
a
couple
weeks.
C
C
C
Well,
so
I
mean
this
proposal
is
not
particularly
well
formed
right.
Like
I
mean,
we
can't
literally
immediately
halt
the
bonding
curve,
because
there's
these
technical
steps
to
actually
do
it
and
it
doesn't
talk
about
how
we're
actually
going
to
do
it.
In
the
proposal
I
mean
it
would
be
nice
if
yeah.
C
This
is
one
of
the
problems
I
have
with
this
discourse.
So
far,
is
it's
like
like
pretty
crude
right,
like
I
mean
like
if
you
have,
when
you're
trying
to
address
something
this
critical,
it's
important
to
like
ask
questions
about
how
this
would
work.
You
know
what
what
are
the
actual
steps
involved
here,
I'm
always
willing
to
like
help
people
kind
of
figure
that
stuff
out.
C
I'm
just
saying
that
what
like
the
the
actual
like
text
of
this
proposal
is
poorly
formed,
I
still
think
that
halting
the
curve
makes
sense
and
that
we
can
do
it
without
and
to
address
geronimo's
point
about
the
technical
effort
to
do
it.
It
really
shouldn't
require
us,
too
much
technical
effort
to
implement
the
ability
to
halt
the
curve.
If
we
do
this
multi
call
thing,
we
really
just
need
to
add
the
the
bonding
curve
itself
to
the
multi
multi-call
scheme
or
another
custom
scheme.
B
Yeah,
I
just
because,
since
there's
like
a
proposal
live
right
now,
I
think
we
should
like
people
voting
yes
or
no
on
that.
I
think
is
to
me,
like
I
think
you
know
we're
coming
up
on
the
like
fifth
or
sixth
time
that
brexit
has
crashed
out
in
some
way
to
use
a
corollary,
and
I
think
it's
really
dangerous
to
like
build
political
momentum
off
of
a
vague
slogan
like
brexit,
because
everyone
can
kind
of
see
what
they
want
in
it,
and
I
think
it's
really
important
that
you
have
more
specifics
on.
B
What's
going
to
happen
when
that
first
thing
is
done
when
we're
kind
of
voting
on
that,
so
I
think,
with
this
proposal
now,
doesn't
really
strike
me
as
having
enough
of
a
specifics
or
plan
of
action
to
execute
after
that.
So
I
think
it's
hard
to
support
this
proposal
now,
but
I
do
think
we
should
continue
to
research
the
bonding
curve.
I
think
we
should
devote
resources
to
it
and
I'd
be
definitely
eager
to
join
and
discuss
new
new
solutions
to
it
with
anyone
who
who's
got
ideas.
C
F
Like
whatever
reasons
john
had
to
to
boost
it,
I
mean
chris
is
very
dominant
right
now
in
the
telegram
chat
at
the
end
of
the
day,
like
we
don't
know
if
he
has.
B
C
L
Think
we
need
to,
I
think
we
need
first
of
all
like
this.
Is
this
discussion
is
not
new
like
I
know,
chris
is
very
like
active
there
and
and
saying
stuff,
but
since,
like
the
reason
why
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
came
to
key
based
and
talk
to
you
guys
was
was
one
of
them
was
the
actually
the
bonding
curve.
I
didn't
know
nothing
about
it.
I
still
don't
know
anything
about
it,
but
this
is
not.
L
This
is
not
only
chris
and
and
obviously
this
proposal
we
shouldn't
be
like
we
shouldn't,
expect
people
to
be
super
technical
and
understand
everything,
even
though,
like
they
shouldn't
even
need
to
be
discussing
stuff
in
the
chat,
they
could
just
do
a
proposal
just
a
single
proposal.
I
don't
think
we
should
be
that
critical
and-
and
we
should
let
our
votes
do
the
rest
like.
I
think
we
should
just
don't.
L
C
I
told
you
how
we
could
do
it.
We
raised
it
like
that's
our
job
and
I
agree
with
zed
here
right,
like
the
job
like
if
we
like.
I
have
an
awareness
of
the
fact
that
if
I
sit
here
and
point
to
like
a
10
page
doc
from
fairment
about
you
know,
revenue
sharing
organizations
that
is
largely
irrelevant
to
what
we're
doing
right,
like
the
body
curve,
served
its
purpose.
It
raised
us
money
and
I
think
it
was
great
at
the
time
you
know
we
came
out
of
nowhere
right.
C
It
needed
time
for
us
to
raise
money.
The
bunny
curt
was
perfect
for
that,
but
now
I
think
it's
less
perfect
now,
because,
if
you
think
about
it,
the
price
goes
up
as
the
square
root
of
the
market
cap
and
that's
like
a
big
deterrent
for
people
buying
it
we've
got
that
feedback
right
and
the
other
feedback
we've
gotten
is
that
we
are
not
acting
quickly
and
we
didn't
the
plan
said
we're
going
to
do
it
in
two
months.
We
haven't
done
anything
about
it.
B
C
B
F
A
F
Like
I
personally,
I
don't
like
I
agree
with
john
there's.
No
like
there
there's
no
real,
like
negative
impact
for
us
to
make
sure
that
the
bonding
cough
is
not
minting
any
more
dixie,
because
we
don't
need
more
money.
That's
like
that's
clear
and
I
think
everyone
is
would
be
fine
with
it.
But
I'm
personally,
like
I'm
very
focused
on
our
products
and
I
think
strategically.
F
C
B
C
B
C
So
I
mean
if,
if
it's
helpful,
I
can
make
another
proposal
that
spells
out
exactly
how
we
can
do
it.
Would
that
convince
you
to
vote
for
it.
B
I
mean
I
would
like
to
discuss
and
hear
other
people's
thoughts,
I'm
just
giving
you
like
what
my
on
this
specific
proposal
in
here.
I
just
think
we
don't
have
enough
like
signal
on
it
and,
like
you
know,
there's
still
six
or
six
days
up
there.
So
there's
a
lot
more
debate
and
discussion,
but
I
don't
think
there's
a
clear
like
signal
from
this
proposal
on
what
comes
afterwards.
B
B
C
C
Be
like
we've
gotten
enough
signal
to
say
that
like
look
like
people,
don't
like
this,
we
can
like
pause
it
to
show
that,
like
we
are
listening
to
that,
and
it
makes
sense
and
then
once
we
have
the
dxd
guild,
we
can
run
a
real
dxd
vote
on
it
and
if
they
want
to
unpause
it,
then
we
can
unpause.
It
then.
B
L
F
C
I
mean
the
other
thing
is
like
we've
also
been
getting
criticism
like
I've
heard
the
word
bureaucrat
like
eight
times
the
last
two
weeks
and
like
this
is
exactly
what
we
don't
need
to
be
doing
right.
We
don't
need
to
like
reward
the
proposal.
It's
it's
clear
right
like
stop.
The
bonding
curve
do
whatever
is
technically
possible
to
stop
it.
We've,
like
already
indicated
how
that's
possible
like
if
it
wasn't
possible
yeah
I
mean,
are.
M
B
B
The
idea
of
what
comes
after
you,
this
is
what
I've
been
saying
the
whole
time.
I
think
you
need
a
plan
of
action
before
like
going
into
that.
I
think
the
dynamics
change
once
you
do
something,
and
then
you
start
negotiating
the
dynamics,
completely
change
right.
You
need
to
do
this
like
negotiation
before
and
have
not
even
like
the
whole
way,
but
just
have
some
plan
or
idea
on
it.
So
people
know
what
they're
voting
again.
B
B
C
D
Yeah,
when
I
think
of
holding
the
bonding
curve
or
like
getting
rid
of
the
bonding
curve
like
the
language
kind
of
matters,
because
what
if
we
just
got
rid
of
the
bonding
curve
like
burn
it
right
like
send
it
to
zero
zero
zero
address
and
like
there
is
no
more
bonding
curve?
Would
that
work?
Or
is
that
the
problem,
because
there's
eth
in
it
and
revenue
is
going
to
flow
to
it
so
like
how
like
to
just
get
rid
of
the
bonding
curve
like?
L
B
The
only
thing
that
matters
guys
what's
proposals
unchained
and
I'm
reading
the
proposal
that
says
immediately
halt
the
bonding
curve
without
a
clear
plan
of
action
on
how
to
halt
the
bonding
curve
or
what
to
have,
and
after
that's
the
reason
I'm
voting
against
it.
I
don't
think
like
yeah
with
with
those
if
we
address
those
I'd
be
happy
to
consider.
B
This
is
why,
when
you
like
write
bills,
you
have
committees
that,
like
narrow
things
down
so
that
you
can
like
have
inputs
from
different
one,
and
you
can
actually
like
vote
on
something
that
has
you
know
a
clear,
clear,
clear
idea
of
what
it
what's
actually
going
to
be
voted
on.
I
don't
I
don't
like
don't
understand
what
why.
G
I
mean
why
don't
we
just
I
agree,
you
know
to
fill
out
and
then,
like
already
agreed,
that
we
should
form
like
a
guild
to
determine
what's
happening
with
the
guild
right
afterwards.
Sorry
with
the
bonding
curd
curve
right
afterwards
long
term,
I
think
short
term.
G
G
Yeah,
I'm
happy,
like
I
know,
like
a
few
friends
who
are
like
really
into
bonding
curves,
I'm
happy
to
to
ask
them
if
they
want
to.
If
they
want
to
take
a
step,
and
probably
I
would
judge.
B
Yeah,
I
would
vote
and
join
a
bonding
curve
working
group
like
today.
I
think
it's
super
super
important.
I
thought
that
we'd
be
developing
and
launch
a
bonding
curve
working
group
in
the
last
month,
or
so
we
haven't
gotten
around
to
it,
but
that
to
me
is
the
next
step.
F
E
I
agree
with
that,
but
also
one
point
right
now
to
think
about
is
that
it
is
effective.
It's
effectively
halted,
because
the
market
price
is
so
much
lower,
no
one's
actually
buying
from
the
bonding
curve.
So
I
feel
like
this
is
just
a
beautiful
opening
to
start
a
working
group.
People
actually
want
to
work
on
that,
but
then
the
people
who
want
to
focus
on
product
and
focus
on
product
and
then
maybe
get
some
sort
of
proposal
down
the
line
with
maybe
some
help
from
christopher's
mathematician
contacts.
L
All
right,
so
what
do
you
mean?
What's
what's
the
next
step
here,
so
someone
needs
to
make
a
proposal,
that's
more
clear
that
we
want
to
discuss
like
the
whole
bonding
curve
in
in
general,
or
do
we
like
in
my
mind
we
that
this
proposal,
obviously
wasn't
that
technical,
I
didn't
say
how
to
do
it.
It
was
more
of
a
of
signal
proposal
and
I
don't
know
what
we
expecting
from
every
rep
holder.
If
they
want
to
do
a
proposal,
we
shouldn't
be
super
picky.
L
B
Yeah,
I
think
that's
for
every
rep
holder
to
decide,
and
I
think
if
this
is
a
proposal
that,
like
you
feel
strongly
about,
I
think
every
one
should
vote
on
this
and
then
there
would
be
clear
signal.
There
would
be
some
signal
and
then
you
know
we'd
debate
what
that
signal
is.
So
I
think
this
proposal
will
be
in
the
queue
for
another
like
six
days.
B
So
presumably
there
will
be
some
voting
on
it
here
and
there
I
would
be
willing
to
work
with
someone
or
myself
to
submit
another
working
group
proposal
or
like
a
scope
of
work.
That
kind
of
does
that
be
working
on
that
in
the
meantime,
as
a
follow-up
to
this,
but
the
proposal
is
still
already
boosted
and
will
be
able
to
be
voted
on
for
the
next
six
days.
F
C
No,
I
don't
want
to
spend
time
on
this
and
I
just
voted
for
the
proposal.
We
have
much
more
important
things
to
do
like
work
on
the
products
work
on
governance
2.0.
Frankly,
we
have
the
flexibility
to
fundraise
in
the
future
via
the
dxd
and
the
treasury,
via
the
ability
to
upgrade
the
curve
like.
I
don't
think
this
needs
to
be
a
priority
and
I
don't
think
we
need
a
plan
because
we
have
the
flexibility
that
we
needed
in
the
future.
C
Takes
I
mean,
I
think,
if
at
some
point
we
need
to
address
what
the
bonding
curve
is.
There's
2500
ether
in
there.
It
is
how
we
distribute
it
at
some
point.
We
need
to
to
address
that.
I
think
the
priority
and
the
focus
now
should
be
on
governance
2.0
and
on
getting
revenue.
Omen
needs
to
generate
revenue
basis,
revenue.
C
C
M
M
C
So
that
we
don't
need
to,
we
don't
need
to
do
that.
We
don't
need
to
do
the
multi
call.
So
this
we're
still
like
this
is
like
a
little
bit
too
technical
for
this,
but
like
we
can
we
have
a
choice
between
individual
schemes
or
combining
them
into
the
multi
call.
I
don't
think
we
should
be
doing
funding
proposals
through
the
multi
call.
So
this
I
don't
know
if
you
would
count
this
as
a
funding
proposal
right
it
modifies
the
curve,
so
it
has
impact,
but
it's
not
going
to
drain
funds
from
the
treasury.
B
B
That
this
is
going
to
take
pressure
or
ideas
or
tape,
our
focus
off
of
the
bonding
curve.
I
imagine
that
it
would
kind
of
make
it
focus
once
again,
because
we
have
to
answer
all
these
questions
if.
C
B
C
It's
a
function,
call
on
the
curve
to
set
a
single
parameter,
which
is
the
minimum
buy.
So
the
only
thing
we're
lacking
to
be
able
to
do.
This
is
the
actual
scheme
which
connects
the
dow's
governance
to
the
curve
itself,
which
we
should
have.
The
only
reason
we
haven't
done.
It
is
because
it's
like
you
said,
there's
other
priorities,
so
we
didn't,
we
just
haven't
how.
C
Any
new
plug-in
takes
like
14
days
after
being
boosted
two
days.
The
boost
of
16
days,
total
about
three
weeks
and
nico
has
actually
done
some
of
these
before
so,
you
could
probably
speak
to
how
long
it
takes
to
develop
it.
H
Yeah,
so
it's
hard
to
respond
immediately
to
it,
but
from
what
I
get
so
far,
it
would
be
one
parameter.
We
probably
need
to
change
on
your
bonding
smart
contract,
so
it
would
probably
be
a
pretty
easy
plugin
which
could
be
ready
within
alchemy
within
a
week.
We
don't
need
an
audit
for
that,
because
it's
like
a
standard
module
that
we
are
using
plus
the
governance
time
to
actually
activate
it
and
install
it
on
the
dollar.
C
Kit
is
asking,
if
it's
possible
to
lower,
so
we
could
lower
the
price
the
problem.
There,
though
I
think,
would
be
that
if
the
the
market
price
actually
goes
above,
the
bonding
curve
bid
price
and
you
wanted
to
unpause
it.
That
would
have
these
weird
effects
right,
where
the
curve
would
just
mint
up
to
the
bottom
of
the
market
price
and
the
market
price
would
come
down
and
meet
it
somewhere
in
the
middle.
C
C
D
I
D
C
B
Yeah
yeah,
I
mean
the
boosting.
I
find
interesting
because,
like
what,
why
do
you
boost?
Because
in
like
in
this
case,
I
guess
it's
like
you
boosted,
because
you
thought
it
was
important
for
rep
holders
to
vote
on
this.
Or
did
you
boost
it?
Because
you
thought
rep
holders
were
gonna
pass
this,
so
you
want
to
boost
it
so
that
you
can
like
earn
some
of
that.
So
so
I
mean.
C
In
theory
like
the
like
game
theory
or
whatever,
is
that
like
people
should
be
boosting
when
they
think
it's
gonna
pass,
and
so
they
make
it
more,
they
make
a
little
money
off
of
getting
the
gen
state
on
the
opposite
side
right
so
like
I
have
2
000
gen
in
this
proposal,
boosted,
which
is
like
what
300
worth
of
gen
right
now
that
but
like.
I
wasn't
confident
that
this
would
pass
like
right,
like
I'm,
not
I'm
still,
not
confident
like
yeah.
C
I
have
no
idea
if
it's
gonna
pass
or
not,
but
I
felt
like
it's
the
thing
that
that
makes
sense,
and
I
wanted
to
get
this
off
of
our
plate.
So
we
can
focus
on
more
important
things
I
wanted
to
like,
like
make
sure.
Dxd
holders
know
that
we
are
actually
listening
to
them,
and
I
want
to
dispel
any
idea
that
we're
bureaucrats,
because
I
don't
think
of
myself
as
a
bureaucrat.