►
From YouTube: DXdao Weekly Meeting #44 (Recap) [2021-06-10]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hey
everyone
welcome
to
the
dxdot
community
recap
call
for
june
10
2021
at
1500
utc.
My
name
is
keenan
I'll,
be
taking
over
the
call
today
in
sky's
absence
for
the
uninformed,
the
community
recap
call
happens.
Bi-Weekly
on
thursdays
between
our
new
community
discussion
calls
that
I
also
run.
This
call
gives
an
avenue
for
our
product
squads
to
keep
dx
doubt
in
the
community
at
large
in
the
loop
on
our
various
efforts
and,
as
you
know,
we
have
a
lot
going
on
so
we'll
get
right
into
it.
B
Yes,
let
me
give
the
update
for
omen,
so
there's
been
some
progress
towards
the
next
release,
which
is
upcoming
and
now,
when
people
claim
their,
you
know
redeem
their
payout
they
and
they
also
happen
to
be
people
who
bonded
eath
or
die
on
reality
to
really
not
eat
to
finalize
the
market.
They'll
get
that
payment
back.
So
that's
like
been
integrated
into
the
payout
redemption.
B
There's
been
a
bunch
of
little
bug,
fixes
and
improvements,
and
the
other
thing
that
is
going
on
is
the
work
is
being
done
on
the
guild
and
liquidity
rewards
feature.
A
little
blocker
that
has
been
hit
on
liquidity.
Mining
for,
for
omen,
token,
is
that
the
fixed
product
market
maker
used
in
omen.
B
So
maybe
you
come
in
with
die
and
you
want
to
trade
on,
like
you
know,
president
presidential
election,
like
yes
and
no
right,
so
so
the
first
step
that
happens.
Is
you
deposit
your
die
collateral
and
emits
equal
amounts
of
the
yes
and
no
outcome
tokens?
This
is
just
always
what
happens
with
prediction
markets,
because
there's
always
an
equal
amount
of
yes
and
no
or
whatever
the
outcome.
Tokens
are
there's.
C
B
An
equal
amount
of
all
the
outcome,
tokens
per
collateral
unit
of
collateral,
and
it's
at
that
point
that
the
fee
is
actually
taken
on
the
collateral.
So
the
fixed
price
market
maker
in
omen
is
actually
tracking
fees
separately.
With
that
collateral
token-
and
this
is
fundamentally
different
than
how
balance
or
unit
swap
work
where
the
fees
are
actually
taken
in
the
like
composite
tokens
in
the
amm
like
the
in
which
you
know
it
would
be
those
like
two
outcome
tokens
or
it
could
be
more
depending
on
how
many
outcomes.
B
So
the
important
thing
is
like
the
fees
are
kept
separately
in
the
collateral
token
and
the
accounting.
So
this
introduces
some
more
like
accounting
work,
a
little
bit
different
than
how
balance
or
unit
swap
works
and
the
way
the
the
market
makers
written
in
omen
and
actually
has
a
callback
for
every
transfer
that
is
done.
The
fees
are
actually
like,
claimed
and
paid
out
for
that
liquidity
provider
on
transfer.
But
this
is
like
you
know.
B
I
guess
this
works
and,
however,
the
the
math
is
being
done
in
there,
but
it
sort
of
breaks
composability
for
omen,
liquidity
providers
and
those
lp
tokens.
Because
now,
if
you
go
deposited
on
a
staking
contract,
when
you
go
to
withdraw
from
that
speaking
contract,
the
market
maker
is
sending
the
fees
to
the
staking
contract,
which
we
don't
want
right.
We
want
the
fees
to
go
to
the
liquidity
provider.
B
So
that's
the
problem
where
we're
like
working
on
right
now,
we're
workshop
workshopping
it
this
week,
myself
and
federico,
took
a
look
along
with
cadence
and
the
rest
of
the
omen
squad,
and
you
know
we
have
some
ideas.
I
think
the
simplest
thing
may
be
just
a
special
case.
The
staking
contract,
but.
D
B
The
other
option
would
be
to
simply
like
not
take
the
fee
out
of
the
collateral
and
to
take
the
fee
and
the
outcome
tokens,
but
we
think
it's
a
desirable
feature
for
omen
to
be
keeping
the
fees
in
the
collateral
token,
because
that
is
guaranteed
right,
like
if
you
have
your
fees
in
the
pool
you're
exposed
to
the
the
price
movement
that
we
know
is
pretty
risky
with
prediction
markets
right,
because
in
a
yes
no
market,
one
of
those
tokens
is
going
to
zero.
B
So
if
your
collateral
is
in
there,
your
collateral,
I
mean,
if
you're
a
liquidity
provider-
and
you
have
the
two
outcome-
companies
in
there.
If
you
let
you
leave
it
into
the
end,
it's
it's
worth.
Nothing!
So
obviously,
there's
this
game
of
pulling
it
out
in
time
to
protect
yourself.
But
basically
the
thought
is
that
having
the
fees
separate
is
is
probably
a
desirable
feature
for
the
liquidity
provider
anyways,
it's
a
little
technical,
a
little
complicated,
but
that's
the
omen,
update.
E
Really
interesting,
actually
just
the
fees
part
of
that
I'm
just
thinking
of,
I
guess,
is
that
amms
in
general.
Right
and
omen
is
just
like
an
extreme
case
of
that,
because
I'm
just
thinking
about,
I
guess,
for
the
protocol
fees
for
swapper
and
I
think
all
the
others
like
you
are
taking
it
in
the
lp
token,
which
is
would
not
be,
I
guess,
like
the
collateral
base.
E
B
Problem
yeah,
I
mean,
I
think
it
it's
more
specific
to
prediction
markets,
because
in
in
the
prediction
markets,
you
have
these
two
outcome:
tokens
that
are
backed
by
a
third
token,
which
is
collateral,
whereas
if
you
look
at
just
a
normal
unit
swap
market,
you
just
have
the
two
tokens
in
the
market
right,
so
I
think
unique
to
prediction
markets.
You
actually
have
this
third
token
that
is
involved
yeah
yeah.
That
makes
sense
collateral,
whereas
yeah.
B
So
so
I
think
in
general,
if
you're
just
coming
in
with
two
tokens,
then
keeping
the
fees
in
the
pool,
which
is
what
unit
swap
and
balance,
which
is,
it
probably
just
makes
more
sense.
It's
definitely
more
elegant,
but
I
think
the
the
liquidity
provider
is
willing
to
kind
of
just
keep
the
two
tokens
that
they
already
have
right
like
to
take
fees
in
those
tokens.
That
kind
of
makes
more
sense
if
you're
a
market
maker
on
a
prediction
market
like
it's
a
little
less
clear.
A
B
I'm
you're
very
quiet,
I
don't
know
if
it's
here,
yeah.
F
Yeah
yeah,
I
show,
I
think
I
show
the
interface
you
know
and
although
I
just
connect
all
the
compute
and
then,
if
you
see
there,
we
are.
F
F
F
F
F
F
So
there
you
see
all
the
closed
sales
and
right
now
yeah
on
this
place.
You
can't
claim,
but
we
are
adding
this
right
now
and
then
you
have
like
the
upcoming
sales.
There's
none
right
now,
then
these
are
all
test
sales
on
x
die
and
then,
if
I
go
to
test
cell,
I
have
to
change
my
to
show
this,
so
we
added
some
feature
that
it
detects.
If
you
have
owned
the
wrong
network,
then
you
can
change
the
network
to
it,
made
the
mask
here.
F
F
F
F
It's
money
transaction.
So
what's
what
we're
adding
here
what's
missing
is
like
there's
like
a
more
visualization,
how
much
token
there
are,
but
this
already
exists.
We
have
just
to
integrate
this
so
yeah.
Now
the
transaction
has
been
mined
at
the
moment.
We
don't
see,
we
don't
have
a
list
of
purchases,
but
this
exists
on
other
branches
are
working
on
and
then
yeah
they're
already.
This
is
a
different
sale.
We
used
it's
also
possible.
There
is
a
token
we
made
a
token
page.
F
But
this
is
empty
now
for
my
wallet,
because
I
didn't
claim
any
token,
but
the
page
will
then
show
if
you
take
took
part
in
a
sale
in
any
sales
in
in
the
past.
It
will
loop
through
all
the
sales
and
show
you
where
you
have
some
tokens
and
then
you
can
redraw
the
tokens
or
claim
your
tokens
back.
F
It's
the
euro,
yeah
yeah
that
we
have
new
workers,
so
ross
is
joining
us
and
he
works
around
10
hours
a
week,
a
little
bit
more
and
then
he's
a
level
three
worker,
and
then
I
also
talked
to
madusha,
who
is
also
around
this
level
and
he
maybe
can
spend
almost
20
20
hours
a
week
and
he's
working
also
in
the
front
end
and
then
hamsa
is
still
working
on
the
front
end
and
yeah.
F
That's
we
are,
and
I
think
we
focus
next
time
we
try
to
focus
on
the
fixed
price
sale
and
then
we
will
add
the
fair
price,
but
I
think
the
fixed
price
is
quite
important
to
get
ready
because
it's
like,
if
you
look
at
the
market,
if
the
mark
auction
are
very
good.
If
there's,
if
it's
very
bullish
and
a
lot
of
you
know,
you
say
it
finds
a
lot
of
traction,
but
it's
they're
not
so
boring
situation.
F
Then,
if
you
make
an
auction,
you
have
to
risk
that
it's
not
going
to.
If
there's
not
a
lot
of
demand,
then
you
will
not
get
a
good
price
and
or
you
have
more
risk
of
failing
because
the
auction,
yet
it
has
like
a
floor
price.
So
if,
if
there's
not
enough
people
who
to
beat
on
the
on
the
auction,
you
get
like
a
floor
price
and
then
it's
it's
the
same
like
a
fixed
price
sale.
B
F
An
auction
is
a
good,
very
good
solution,
because
if
there's
no
market
price
normally,
if
then,
then
for
a
fixed
price
says
somebody,
the
project
themselves
has
has
to
establish
a
price,
and
then
it's
it's
not
that
the
sentiment
on
the
on
the
market
or
the
market.
The
information
about
the
project
about
this,
this
this
project
or
the
sale.
Is
there
not
it's
not
it's
not
part
of
the
price,
and
if
you
make
an
auction,
then
you
get
the
market
sentiment
and
you
see
much
more.
F
The
market
sentiment
of
of
the
against
or
not
against,
of
this
product
project,
and
then
you
get
a
better
yeah.
You,
you
get
the
market
price,
and
this
is
somehow
important
because
of
two
reasons:
one
is
you
you
get
the
price
who
is
like
fair
for
every
market
participant?
F
You
know
people
bidding
on
the
on
the
on
the
on
the
auction,
get
the
fair
price,
but
also
the
project
itself
gets
a
fair
price,
because
if
you
make
like
a
fixed,
buy
sale-
and
there
is
much
more
demand
than
you
think
and
you
sell-
you
sell
out
all
the
token
out
in
a
very
quick
time.
Then
it's
just
first
come
first
serve
and
what
you
have
at
the
end.
You
can't
extract
the
best
value
out
of
the
sale
because
the
token
has
been
gone.
F
You
have
a
fixed
amount
of
money
where
you
exchange,
for
which
you
exchange
for
a
fixed
price
of
token.
But
if
there's
more
demand
you
don't
have
you
don't
get
profits.
The
profit,
then,
is
mostly
extracted
by
the
people
who
who
are
able
to
be
who
were
able
to
say
to
buy
a
token
and
then
if
the
price
goes
up,
they
sell
it
on
the
secondary
market
and
they
make
the
gains
of
this.
The
exact
value
of
your
project
somehow
and
yeah.
F
So
the
next
step
will
be
adding
this
auction
mechanism
and
it's
already
it's
almost
done,
but
the
interface
needs
some
work
and
also
on
the
smart
contract
side.
Maybe
we
have
to
add
stuff
if
we
see
it
on
the
interface
that
we
miss
things
yeah.
F
F
I
don't
know
how
they
do
it.
You
know
they.
They
need
a
process
to
look
at
the
pro
project.
If
they
are
not
like
scam
projects
and
then
they
they
they
do
it
or
they
allow
it
on
their
platform
and
at
the
start
we
also
have
somehow
to
create
the
the
sales.
But
if
you
look
at
the
there's
one
one
project
other
projects
which
people
could
like
self
listen
sales
and
there
you
get
a
lot
of
noise.
F
F
It's
like
that,
the
platform
is
like
successful,
so
so
in
their
intention,
then
they
can,
like
you,
know,
upvote
or
stake
behind
the
sale,
and
then
this
kind
of
signal
can
then
be
used
to
to
as
a
quality
insurance
for
the
sales,
because
that,
if
it's,
if,
if
economics
is
well
done,
then
people
will
only
bet
of
support
projects
which
has
a
potential
and
not
like
the
bad
actors
and
the
the
the
thing
is
that
at
the
end,
that
is
that
it's
like
self
self
common
the
platform.
F
But
this
is
like
yeah.
I
think
the
omen
roman
guilt-
this
is
somehow
is
maybe
connected,
and
maybe
we
will
see
how
oman
is
going,
this
direction
of
our
heavenly
government's
token
and
govern
the
platform,
and
we
will
try
to
learn
from
this.
I
guess.
A
Perfect
well,
thank
you,
martin.
Any
other
questions
from
mesa.
A
Cool,
let's,
let's
move
on
to
swapper,
then
I'm
sure
we
all
taste
beta
at
this
point.
Maybe
zed
wants
to
give
us
an
update.
C
Yeah,
so
we
were
waiting
for
a
proposal
to
pass
for
the
token
list
of
swapper
beta
and
it
just
passed
actually,
so
we
actually
doing
some
some
checks,
so
everything
went
fine
with
the
token
list
and
after
that,
we're
actually
releasing
yeah
releasing
the
code
for
for
swapper
beta
and
are
ready
to
like
yeah
try
to
get
deployed,
and
I
will
not
say
any
dates
or
days,
because
every
time
I
do
that,
I
kinda
make
it
worse,
but
cardinal
rule
of
productivity
never
commit
to
a
heart
so
but
but
yeah
we
we
are
here
in
the
final
stages,
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
checks.
C
We
need
to
do
and
and
obviously
we
deploy
stuff
differently
than
other
crypto
projects.
It's
not
hard.
It
just
takes
more
time
when,
when,
when
it's
a
dial
right,
it
takes
five.
Six
seven
days
depends
on
on
on
the
proposal
type,
but
so
yeah.
We
just
need
to
respect
how
it
works
and
yeah
so
we're
in
the
final
stages
here
other
than
that
maybe
federico.
If
you
wanna
is
federico
here,
no
nope,
maybe
john,
do
you
know
about
the
arbitrary
I
mean
you
know?
B
Use
the
word
launched
at
this
stage,
but
swapper
as
well
as
the
dxdot
base,
has
have
been
deployed.
The
smart
contracts
have
been
deployed
onto
arbitrome,
and
you
know
whitelisted
users
can,
you
know,
theoretically
interact
with
those?
I
don't
think
it's
that
meaningful.
B
Yet
at
least
as
far
as
I
know,
because
the
br,
the
bridges
have
not
been
opened
up
and
activated
yet
so,
at
least
as
far
as
I
know,
the
last
I'd
heard
from
the
arbitrary
team,
they
had
not
enabled
the
ethor
of
the
token
bridges
to
the
mainnet
beta,
so
without
that,
it's
really
hard
to
do
anything
yep.
So
we're
waiting.
B
Basically
for
that
to
happen
to
kind
of
continue
along
with
testing
and
to
be
prepared
for
when
it
opens
up
to
the
end
users,
which
you
know,
I
think,
is
at
least
a.
D
C
That's
super
cool,
so
we
basically
are
on
the
same
stage
as
a
lot
of
the
other
dapps
out
there
that
announcing
pre-announcing
arbitram.
We
are
at
the
first
batch
of
of
dapps
that
will
be
available
on
orbitrum
other
than
that
swapper
economics.
We've
been
doing
great
work
there.
Chris,
maybe
do
you
have
any
words
on
that.
E
No
there's
a,
I
know,
that's
people.
E
Well,
actually,
we'll
get
to
that
in
a
second,
but
just
like
the
swapper
token
discussion,
I
think
there's
a
doc
in
the
swapper
channel
in
key
base.
It's
probably
like
the
best
and
then
yeah
right,
we'll
hit
on
it
tomorrow
during
product
strategy,
too.
That's
cool.
C
E
C
E
E
That's
what
I
was
like,
I
was
trying
to
explain
the
whole
like
process
and
that
but
yeah
where.
B
Anything
else
on
swapper
is
that
then
we
can.
I
Yes,
I'm
here
yeah,
I'm
coding,
I'm
trying
to
fix
the
expo
to
show
alchemy
proposals,
so
I've
been
working
on
that
since
yesterday.
I
think
I
got
it.
I
think
I
got
it
so
the
idea
is
to
actually
I
got
it.
I
saw
the
proposal
description
from
ipfs
on
dx
vote
from
mainnet,
which
is
awesome,
and
the
idea
is
to
make
some
changes
on
dx
boat
application,
the
the
application
for
our
governance
platform
that
we
plan
to
use.
I
We
plan
to
start
using
xi
and
arabic
room
since
alchemy,
for
example,
doesn't
have
support
on
arbitrary
and
we
need
a
governance
platform
there.
So
we
created
the
expo
to
use
there
and
I'm
doing
some
small
changes
to
index
all
the
information
that
we
are
seeing
on
from
maintain
alchemy
on
the
export.
I
So
the
idea
will
be
to
use
at
least
the
export
to
read
and
to
see
all
the
information
that
we
have
on
mainnet
on
our
go
on
on
our
avatar
on
our
all
the
excel
contracts
there
directly
from
ethereum
connected
with
the
ethereum
provider.
So
there
is
no
going
to
be
any
subgraph
in
the
middle,
so
that's
it!
I
That
is
what
we
are,
what
we
are
working
on
and
we
are
going
to
be
well,
I'm
going
to
be
showing
it
very
soon,
maybe
even
today,
and
the
idea
is
to
deploy
the
expo
on
xi
and
arabitrum
actually
on
xi
next
week
with
the
same
reputation
attribution
that
we
have
on
exit.
So
hopefully
we
are
going
to
start
using
that
I
added
something
that
is
very
cool.
There
is
a
ski.
I
The
proposal
template
I
talked
with
melanie,
so
we
are
going
to
have
different
templates
for
signal
worker
payments,
worker
compensations
contribution
proposals
for
everything
to
make
everything
easier
for
the
for
the
proposal
creator
and
to
have
more
standardized
content
in
the
proposals.
So
that's
it
a
lot
of
work
there.
A
Perfect
yeah
thanks
augusto
that
marks
the
end
of
our
product
recaps,
moving
on
to
our
kind
of
school
quad,
starting
with
governance.
Maybe
chris
you
want
to
lead
that
off.
E
Yeah,
I
just
hear
some
noise
on
the
street
as
soon
as
I'm
going
in
but
yeah.
So
I
guess
with
the
gusto
talking
about
zeke's
vote,
you
know
he's
hinting
at
some
of
the
issues
we've
been
having
with
alchemy
the
last
week.
So
for
those
that
aren't
aware,
there's
been
some
problems
and
content
proposal
things
so
in
viewing
the
the
content
of
different
proposals,
so
we're
trying
to
cover
the
different
fixes
for
that
in
yesterday's
governance.
Discussion
talked
a
lot
about
that.
E
I
did
come
up
with
a
guide
that
I
will
share
here
for
how
to
view
the
content
on
any
proposal
by
going
like
straight
through
block
scout
and
looking
at
the
ipfs
hash
itself.
So
that
should
be
a
way
for
any
voter
or
someone
who's
submitting
a
proposal
to
be
able
to
make
sure
and
view
the
contents
of
it
but
yeah,
hopefully
we're
having
a
quick
fix
from
alchemy.
E
I
mean
from
dalstack
that
maybe
coming
in
the
next
day
or
or
so
and
then
augusto's
talking
about
the
the
long-term
fix
and
the
ability
to
really
create
a
very
resilient
platform
that
doesn't
have
these
dependencies
on
third-party
services.
That
sometimes
go
down
and
really
put
governance
at
a
standstill.
When
that
happens,
yeah
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
john
anything
else
for
for
alchemy.
B
B
Bit
about
sorry,
I
was
a
distracted
for
a
second,
but
we
haven't
addressed
technically
the
issue
right.
I
can
just
describe
that.
B
Yeah,
so
it's
I
mean
this
is
obviously
it's
embarrassing,
especially
for
the
open
competition
you
know
for
us
to
have
governance
not
being
working,
unfortunately,
we're
not
directly
in
control
of
the
platform,
because
it's
dao
stack's
platform,
you
know
this
is
why
augusto's
efforts
with
dx
vote
are
so
important
for
the
future.
So
the
issue
that
we
are
facing
right
now
is
that
the
title
and
the
description,
even
though
they
are
being
stored
to
ipfs,
where
the
data
is,
is
stored.
B
When
you
create
a
proposal,
it's
not
displaying
on
alchemy,
when
you
go
to
view
the
proposals
today,
right
so
and
the
reason
this
is
happening
is
there's
some
kind
of
a
disconnect
and
problem
between
the
graph,
which
is
what
alchemy
is
reading
off
of
in
ipfs.
So
the.
B
Caching,
layer
and
a
lot
of
low
steps
and
d5us
that
alchemy
uses
to
cache
blockchain
data
and
keep
performance
fast
when
end
users
are
interacting
with
alchemy
right.
So
for
some
reason
there
is
an
issue
where
the
graph
is
not
picking
up
on
this
data.
That
is
on
ipf
fast.
So
it
it's
been
a
little
bit
difficult
for
us
to
troubleshoot,
because
you
know
javastak
owns,
alchemy
and
then
they're
dealing
with
the
graph.
That
is
having
the
problem
right.
So
we're
actually
like
a
couple
layers
removed
from
the
actual
problem
and
fix.
B
B
The
latest
I
have
heard
is,
you
know
one
of
the
the
co-founders
and
technical
leader
graph
said
yesterday
that
they
had
a
promising
theory
and
that
they
were
working
on
a
fix,
and
I
checked
you
know
I
pinged
them
again
this
morning,
because
I
hadn't
heard
anything
and
heard
back
from
one
of
the
graph
foundation's
business
folks
that
the
plan
is
to
like
roll
it
out
in
the
update
today.
B
So
our
hope
is
that
this,
the
fix
from
the
graph
will
be
live
today
and
then
the
next
step
would
be
to
re-index
some
graph.
That
takes
that's
a
process
that
takes
about
seven
to
eight
hours.
So
our
hope
is
that
this
will
be
fixed
and
working
tomorrow,
but
again,
yeah
like
this
dependency
on
this.
You
know
middleware
this,
this
third
third-party
technology
is
it's
not
great
when
it
comes
to
reliability
and
that's
why
it's
important
that,
like
that,
we
get
the
expo
right.
B
The
booster's
efforts
like
you
know,
get
completed,
and
we
start
working
with
that.
One
of
the
you
know,
besides
the
fact
that
they'll
be
a
home
grown
from
dx.
Now
there
won't
be
a
dependency
on
things
like
the
graph
and
I
think
that'll
be
great
for
reliability
in
the
future.
So
yeah
I
mean
hopefully
that
explains
it.
Is
there
any
questions
like?
As
you
know,
we
do
have
these
workarounds.
You
know
like
it's.
It's
not
dire
in
the
sense
that,
like
you
know,
we
can
still
see
the
proposals
monitoring
still
working.
B
We
can
get
to
the
information,
it's
just
a
big
pain.
To
take
these
extra
steps.
Chris
has
done
a
good
job.
With
this
now
talk
post
on
how
to
do
that.
E
I
do
think
it
highlights
in
a
way
how
deex
dao
is
is
different
from
a
lot
of
other
projects.
E
When
you
know
a
product
goes
down,
there's
some
kind
of
problem,
and
you
know
because
our
entire
system,
governance
is
on
chain
and
we
kind
of
operate
everything
from
paying
people
to
signal
proposals
to
all
these
things
that,
like
allow
us
to
operate
as
an
organization
as
a
collective
like
depend
on
us
finding
consensus
on
chain
in
a
way-
and
I
think
that's
the
way
that
you
know
I
I
think
dick
styles
should
be
run.
E
I
think
other
organizations
should
be
run,
but
it
does
mean
that
you,
when
things
break
it
becomes
really
hard
to
to
work
around
them
in
some
way.
So
I
think
the
resiliency
of
being
able
to
act
in
like
worst
case
scenario
right.
This
is
like
with
the
internet,
maybe
not
when
the
internet
goes
down
but
like
in
all
the
other
scenarios
like,
we
need
to
figure
out
a
way
that
geek
style
can
continue
to
operate
and
function
so
that
we
we.
E
We
aren't
whole
like
hold
beholden
to
anything,
and
I
think
you
know
the
equivalent
or
the
things
we're
striving
for
is,
I
think,
like
ethereum
at
bitcoin
level
of
like
they
don't
go
down.
So
I
think
that's
that's
the
goal,
baron
even
the
this,
the
everything
from
what
what
a
gusto
is
doing
in
terms
of
building
resiliency
and
also
even
like
the
the
workarounds
we
can
do
in
terms
of
the
the
block
scout
and
etherscan
and
looking
at
the
ipfs
hash
directly.
E
I
think
all
of
those
are
are
part
of
like
building
resiliency
for
dx
style,
governance
and
and
at
least
kind
of
make
us
make
us
stronger.
Even
if
it's
a
little
painful.
B
Yeah
and
to
tie
in
what
augusta
was
saying,
he's
working
on
right
right
now,
you
know
he's
coding
as
we
speak,
you
know.
Hopefully,
this
graph
fix
comes
in
and
that
will
help.
You
know,
fix
the
problem,
but
in
parallel,
agusto
is
trying
to
like
update
the
dx
vote
project,
which
has
you
know
its
own
custom
contracts
and
stuff.
That
goes
with
it,
he's
trying
to
make
the
changes
necessary
so
that
dx
vote
the
interface
can
actually
work
with
the
current
contracts
that
we
are
using
on
mainnet.
B
E
And
then
kind
of
just
back
to
more
regular
governance.
So
there
are
a
couple
proposals
that
are
live
on.
Alchemy
you
still.
If
you
got
alchemy
right
now,
you
can't
see
them,
so
we
did
discuss
what
they
are
so
on
on
mainnet
right
now
there,
as
I
said,
the
signal
proposal
for
expanding
to
arbitrary
one
has
just
been
boosted,
along
with
a
I
think,
a
funding
proposal
for
the
omen
squad.
E
That's
been
boosted
that
was
talked
about
last
week,
but
these
proposals
weren't
boosted
and
kind
of
submitted,
because
we
were
afraid
that
people
couldn't
see
them
or
really
understand
them,
but
both
of
those
have
been
boosted.
You
can
check
the
links
in
the
general
and
I
think,
as
that
said,
we
need
to
share
that
in
the
discord
there.
E
E
Buyback
has
completed
seven
orders
and
acquired
567
dxd
I'll
share
the
spreadsheet
here,
and
there
was
discussion
on
potentially
raising
the
slippage
tolerance
to
five
percent
and
a
and
also
some
clarification
on
specifically
how
to
do
the
accounting
for
this,
and
so
hopefully
I'll
be
submitting
a
signal
proposal
to
update
the
buyback
parameters
so
that
we
can
maybe
increase
the
slipper
slippage
tolerance
a
little
bit
there
and
then
the
last
thing
was.
E
There
was
some
good
discussion
on
dx
events
by
dave
and
melanie
kind
of
thinking
about
how
dx
now
can
exist
more
in
the
physical
world.
Whether
that's
going
to
ecc
in
july,
which
several
community
members
are
going
for
or
looking
to
like
host
our
own
types
of
geek
style
events.
And
so
specifically,
the
proposal
actually
had
some
funding
ideas
on
how
we
can
reimburse
people
to
do
that.
So
invite
people
to
check
that.
E
Dave
is
not
here
so
like
the
treasury
update
is
not.
If
there's
anything,
I
think
we
did
do
one
treasury
diversification
on
tuesday
of
this
week
and
I
think
we
are
on
maynet
now
there's
7.8
million
dollars
of
stable
coins
in
total
there,
and
I
think
we
are
at,
like
4.6
million
of
the
5
million
that
we
had
in
the
v2
proposal.
So
I
think
I
think
we
just
have
one
more
proposal
for
the
treasury
diversification
for
the
version
two.
A
And
nearing
on
the
end
of
the
quarter,
I
think
we're
expecting
another
large
treasury
report
as
well
at
the
end
of
the
month.
So
look
forward
to
that
perfect.
I
know
skye,
as
you
know,
is
missing
today,
so
we
have
dx
biz
and
dx
ventures
up
next,
maybe
nathan.
If
you
have
some
kind
of
brief
overview
of
the
events
of
the
last
week,
that
would
be
great
if
you're
here,
no,
I
haven't
actually
prepared
for
this.
That's
okay,
just
some
something
easy!
I
think
something's
better
than
nothing.
I
feel.
B
Yeah,
I
guess,
if
we're
not
prepared,
I
mean
there
are
different.
You
know
dx
ventures,
there
was
theopolis,
I
think
that's
in
processing
that
was
finalized.
There
has
been
some
talk
with
another
project
called
boring
crypto,
which
is
trying
to
do
a
decentralized
reddit.
Some
feedback
was
delivered.
You
know,
I
think
the
tammy
and
skye
were
kind
of
wrestling
with
how
that
fit
in
to
kind
of
the
bigger
like
the
external
picture,
like
is
that
something
style
would
use?
B
We
don't
actually
use
reddit
right
now
directly,
so
we're
kind
of
going
back
and
forth
with
that
project.
With
the
expenditures
there's
been
additional
discussions
on
how
the
accessories
itself
could
potentially
be
expanded.
I
think
sky
has
a
downtown
post,
haven't,
read
it
yet,
but
there's
also
been
some.
You
know:
suggestions
from
1kx
through
christopher
hyman,
on
on
how
dx
now
can
make
all
of
its
projects
more
independent
and
attract
outside
teams
by
you
know
being
an
appealing
place
for
entrepreneurs
to
come,
while
still
retaining
ownership
of
their
project.
G
B
Benefiting
from
some
of
the
decentralized
infrastructure
of
the
extel,
basically,
what
christopher
is
describing
is
you
know,
dxdow
as
a
decentralized
incubator.
It's
a
cool
kind
of
vision
for,
for
what
takes
down
might
do
in
the
future,
encourage
you
to
read
his
dow
talk
post
yeah
other
than
that
there's
like
continuing
you
know,
there's
discussions
with
agave
xdi
and
we're
looking
out
for
other
projects
as
well.
B
That
may
be
interested
in
some
of
the
features
coming
up
and
which
apparently,
this
conditional
token
farming
is
something
cool,
that's
being
worked
on
through
the
the
swapper
squad,
and
I
think
we're
going
to
be
hearing
more
about
that
in
the
next
couple
weeks.
But
the
biz
dev
squad
is
in
the
loop
on
that
feature
and
is
looking
for
other
projects
that
may
want
to
incentivize
activity
and
tbl
with
this
computational
token
farming
feature.
So
that's
what
I
know.
It's
probably
not
a
full
update,
but
I
think
that
gives.
A
Cool
moving
on
marketing
communications
I'll
give
a
little
brief
overview
of
what
we
have
going
on
we're
preparing
for
the
approaching
swap
your
beta
launch
software
arbitrary
deployment,
as
well
as
the
ex
vote.
I
think
me
chris,
and
maybe
a
couple
others
have
a
meeting
with
their
team
today
to
sync
up
on
that
effort.
A
A
We
released
the
month
may
month
in
review
last
week,
which
I
obviously
always
recommend
giving
a
read.
We
also
released
a
guide
to
the
web
through
revolution
and
intro
pieces
for
the
omen
competition.
So
thank
you
kaden
for
those
the
omen
community
competition
completed.
I
think
we
touched
on
this
a
lot
already,
but
after
we
deal
with
some
of
the
outstanding
problems
to
get
the
markets
up
on
omen,
we'll
be
kind
of
having
an
announcement
style.
Recap
post
as
well.
E
You
know
I
didn't
even
raise
my
finger,
it's
just
you
could
well,
I
just
wanted
to
say,
like
obviously
the
alchemy
stuff
was
really.
E
You
know
disappointing
with
the
omen,
competition,
and
especially
like,
as
it
got
to
the
end
and
like
even
voting,
was
difficult,
but
I
thought
that
the
competition
in
general
was
like
a
great
you
know
way
to
engage
the
community
and
like
up
until
some
of
the
problems
with
alchemy
was
like
a
really
cool
thing,
and
obviously
that
is
the
type
of
activity
and
engagement
that
the
omen
guild
will
be
doing.
You
know
with
the
omen
token,
so
we're
kind
of
building
towards
that,
but
I'd
definitely
be
like
support.
E
I
don't
know
if
we
can
run
the
competition
right
back
at
some
time,
but
I
think
like
this
is
something
that
was
even
if
it
didn't
like
turn
out
exactly
how
we
wanted.
I
think
that
we
should
continue
doing
these
type
of
competitions
even
before
maybe
omen
token.
The
guild
is
like
fully
operational,
but
just
like
building
towards
that
that
type
of
activity.
A
Yeah
agreed
and
there's
also
the
euro
kind
of
plan
marketing
plan
as
well,
which
kind
of
would
probably
fit
into
that
ballpark,
which
I'm
not
completely
familiar
with.
I
think
skye's
running
that
with
the
open
squad,
but
that
kind
of
fits
that
ballpark
as
well.
A
I
guess
moving
on
there
was
another
successful
community
call.
We
had
focused
on
some
updates
from
our
previous
calls.
You
know
with
swapper
beta
and
omen
guild
kind
of
coming
up
on
the
horizon.
Here
this,
the
extel
landing
page
initial
draft
revision
went
out.
I
think
I
put
in
dxr
late
last
week.
I
think
a
couple
people
got
a
chance
to
take
a
look
and
leave
some
feedback,
and
that
was
great.
A
A
I
think
the
only
other
thing
is
that
we're
planning
a
bi-weekly
update
for
the
buyback,
which
I
think
chris
you
might
have
already
mentioned,
and
that
will
probably
take
the
form
of
either
a
medium
post
or
tweet
thread.
Biweekly
cool.
I
think
that's
the
big
stuff
from
our
end,
any.
A
Questions
cool
all
right
awesome.
I
think
the
last
topic
on
the
agenda
is
the
contributor
experience
squad,
but
melanie
is
traveling,
I
believe-
or
maybe
a
doctor's
appointment
she's
not
here
today,
so
maybe
either
myself
or
chris
maybe
want
to
give
a
kind
of
broad
overview
of
what's
going
on
on
our
side,
I.
E
Think,
just
when
melanie
said
yesterday,
like
the
xerox,
hackathon
was
a
great
kind
of
recruiting
opportunity
and
so
like
that
was,
and
I'm
sure,
just
because
john's
speech
was
was
so
inspiring.
But
I
think
we
could
start
to
see
like
some
benefits
of
engaging
that
community
and
so
contributed
ux.
I
think
it
will
continue
to
help
with
figuring
out
how
to
onboard
and
then
yeah
working
on
a
compensation,
new
kind
of
compensation
structure
that
I
think
we
have
a
draft
for
that.
E
We're
hoping
to
share
sometime
soon
and
probably
maybe
talk
about
next
week
on
the
government's
discussion,
but.
A
Cool
yeah
those
are
kind
of
the
big
ticket
things
we're
familiar
with,
and
I
guess
that
kind
of
wraps
up
our
recaps
is
there
any
other
topics
we
might
not
have
touched
on?
A
All
right
cool
thanks
for
being
here
guys
and
we'll
see
you
in
two
weeks
for
the
next
recap
or
next
thursday
same
time.
1500
utc
for
the
community
call
in
discord.