►
From YouTube: DXdao Weekly Meeting #28 (Recap) - [2021-01-21]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
D
B
D
B
C
C
We,
the
good
thing
with
the
delayed
by
clarissa,
that
we
included
a
lot
of
fixes
for
x,
die
primarily
oman
is
using
like
a
really
nice
tool,
which
is
called
the
gnosis
safe
proxy
kit,
which
allows
us
to
which
is
a
smart
contract
wallet
for
the
user.
And
it's
it's
completely
behind
the
hood.
So
any
omen
users
actually
having
a
smart
contract
wallet,
but
they
don't
know
it
and
it's
a
very
powerful
tool,
because
we
can
do
a
lot
of
things
for
the
user,
which
will
improve
the
user.
C
Then
the
api
three
partnership
was
ratified
by
the
gx
star,
which
means
at
some
point
api
three
will
install
an
extra
infrastructure
from
for
their
oracle
service,
which
we
will
then
integrate
into
the
xdy
omen
product
and
then
like
this.
This
is
actually
like
really
great,
because
it's
the
second
oracle
provider
which
will
launch
on
omen
and
omen,
should
be
like
the
most
generic
prediction
market
platform
out
there,
which
means
we
we
want
to
have
a
lot
of
oracle
providers.
C
We
want
to
have
a
lot
of
arbitration
services
there
and
we
want
to
have
like
a
variety
of
trading
venues
launching
on
oman
and
yeah.
That's
from
the
oracle
site
from
from
api,
3
and
gnosis
put
out
a
proposal
for
like
a
long-term
partnership
with
the
dx
doll
and
there's
like
a
hot
discussion
going
on
on
dow
talk.
B
Don't
talk
get
spicy
every
once
in
a
while,
but
yes
yeah,
it's
cool
to
see.
Obviously,
gnosis
has
done
a
lot
of
the
work,
laying
the
groundwork
for
omen
with
the
conditional
tokens
framework
and
the
grants
that
they
had
given
protofire
kind
of
early
on
and
so
yeah.
Obviously
it's
their
wheelhouse
and
I
think,
like
yeah.
When
I
looked
at
the
proposal,
I
just
was
lacking
a
lot
of
detail
as
to
what
they
kind
of
saw
themselves
doing
in
terms
of
their
role
with
omen.
B
C
Oh
another
important
thing
I
actually
totally
forgot
we
are
the
omen
guild
is
actually
working
on
a
roadmap
for
q1
this
year,
which
will
include
a
lot
of
things
and
like
a
general
direction
where
omen
is
going,
especially
with
like
l2's
launching,
primarily
arbitrarily
and
like
where
we
are
where
we
are
gonna.
Progress
on
the
x-style
product,
so
yeah
expect
a
road
map
in
the
coming
days
to
be
put
out
on
dow
talk
in
order
to
discuss
where
omen
should
should
be
heading.
B
That's
awesome,
and,
and
also
a
good
reminder
that
next
week,
at
this
same
time,
we'll
be
doing
the
resource
coordination
book
for
we're
actually
planning
to
kind
of
review
each
product's
six
month
roadmap
and
allow
some
time
for
questions
from
anybody
on
the
call.
Just
in
terms
of
you
know
what
those
roadmaps
are
like
and
then
you
know
we'll
also
be
using
those
plans
to
kind
of
more
formalize
the
budget
and
put
everything
in
context.
E
Just
on
the
the
oracle
with
api,
three
like
how
I
guess,
how
difficult
is
it
to
integrate
other
oracles
and
like
how
much
should
we
be
thinking
about
that?
I
think
agrees.
It's
like
a
generic
place
for
people
to
come,
but
I
guess
like
when
you
create
a
market,
would
you
have
the
opportunity
to
like
select
an
oracle
or
yeah
like
how
do
you
kind
of
yeah?
Should
we
be
going
after
other
oracles
like?
What
are
you
kind
of
thinking
about
that?
F
C
I
I
don't.
I
don't
expect
that
api
3
specifically
will
just
be
focusing
on
x-time,
but,
like
I
totally
expect
they,
they
will
also
like
provide
their
service
on
mainnet,
which
I
don't
think
omen
will
put
complete
focus
on
going
forward
like
I
think
our
focus
should
be
to
transition
for
the
for
the
long
term
into
xti
and
arbitrary
at
the.
At
the
same
time.
That's
a
great
question.
C
One
of
them
was
that
they
have
those
schemes
so
and
that's
something
I
think
where
the
omen
community
can
put
a
lot
of
effort
in
like
providing
schemata
for
specific
market
types.
Like
one
example
would
be
like
the
simple
question
about
like
what
price
will
either
be
at
a
specific
date,
and
then
we
would
have
like
a
ui
scheme
specifically
just
for
for
like
market
prices,
for
example,
and
then
you
can
actually
like
pick
api
three
as
an
oracle
provider
and
then
even
like
the
site.
C
Do
you
want
to
have
like
an
aggregated
price
from
a
variety
of
exchanges?
Or
do
you
want
to
pick
exactly
one
exchange?
I
think
the
market
creation
process
will
need
to
change,
to
be
future
proof
for
like
a
multi
oracle
world
for
women
and
that's
like
a
a
bigger
transition
which
will
need
to
happen
anyway.
E
A
But
the
minute
you
count
on
like
a
very
quick
oracle
that,
like
is
a
price
feed,
whether
you
can
see
what
that
price
feed
is
before
the
market
settles,
and
then
what
whether
you,
whether
that
that
price
fee
can
be
manipulated
in
some
way
like
at
the
time.
Just
before,
like
the
price
the
market
is
ending,
is
still
an
unknown.
E
A
A
E
E
Now,
because
omen
is
like
basically
any
anything
uses
an
oracle
now
like
whether
it's
like
like
options,
protocol
or
like
lending
protocols
like
basically
like
omen,
can
like
almost
produce
like
derivatives
of
that
in
a
way
like
as
long
as
it
has
a
right
oracle.
So
I
just
think
there's
it's
like
actually
like
a
much
more
like
flexible
functional
platform,
so
we
yeah
almost
the
sky's
the
limit
on
all
of
those
things.
C
Yeah
and
the
the
the
cool
thing
with
api
3
is
that
that
we
will
start
with
btc
price
and
ether
price
at
the
beginning,
just
to
like
get
the
crypto
community
to
playing
around
with
it,
and
then
we
actually
also
like
including
sports
sport
markets,
which
just
need
like
like
those
oracles.
They
don't
need
to
like
it's
just
a
one-time
event
and
yeah,
so
we're
actually
exploring
this.
C
The
usage
of
oracle
provide
an
oracle
service
where
you
constantly
need
to
like
send
the
price
in,
but
for
sports,
it's
just
like
a
one-time
request
to
the
to
the
api
three
oracle,
and
then
the
the
service
should
like
tell
the
contract
once
what
what
happened
and
that's
it
so
yeah.
It's.
I
think.
Those
both
both
of
those
type
of
oracles
are
important
and
yeah
will
be.
C
B
And
for
context
here,
though,
the
way
this
works
on
mainnet
at
the
moment
with
omen
is
reality.
I
o
is
the
the
oracle
provider
and
it's
a
very
generic
platform.
Basically
it
crowdsources
the
answer
for
anything
right,
and
then
you
have
some
escalation
that
this
you
know,
people
just
stake
and
then
upstate
to
change
the
answer.
In
theory,
though,
that
could
go
on
forever
or
you
know,
people
could
throw
their
weight
around
if
they
had
a
lot
of
money,
and
so
that's.
B
Why
also
also
there
is
this
arbitration
element
and
that's
where
claros
comes
in
so
they're
sort
of
like
the
court
right.
So
something
is
disputed
on
the
reality.
I
o
level.
It
goes
to
a
claros
court
case
and
they
provide
kind
of
the
final
say
on
what
the
answer
is
and
yeah
you
mentioned
chris,
like
arbitrary
and
like
claros
and
and
toronto
was
also
talking
about
how
there's
some
you
know.
There's
been
a
couple
of
hiccups
just
on
xdi
with
claros,
it's
yeah.
B
B
H
B
I
D
D
I
guess
he
it's
not
here
anymore,
otherwise
he
could
surely
have
introduced
himself
as
well,
but
I
guess
he's
training
for
for
another
quality
next
few
days,
so
it's
not
sure
yet
that
he
will
be
working,
but
we
are
figuring
out
something
with
him
and
he
has
like
his
background,
is
in
crypto
for
some
years,
so
he
has
been
working
on
compound
on
the
past
or
on
synthetics
as
well
and
yeah.
We
hope
we
can
get
him
to
ability
to
miss
our
front
end.
Okay,.
I
I
We
are
in
the
finishing
stages
there,
so
we
will
we'll
probably
see
some,
I
would
say
we
would
see
some
test
net
version
maybe
next
week.
Hopefully
I
can't
promise
that
and
on
government's
governance
side
we
are
also
going
forward
there
and
I
think
the
focus
is
still
farming,
but
we're
we're
moving
on
both
sides,
and
the
audit
also
was
done
this
week,
maybe
federico
or
john.
You
can
talk
more
about.
J
Yeah,
no,
the
the
audit,
we
got
the
results
basically,
and
we
have
some.
We
had
a
couple
minor
minor
things
should
already
fix
them.
The
minor
things
well
moderate
more
than
minor
the
minor
things
I
still
have
to
fix,
and
I
would
I
would
like
to
to
add
that
yesterday
I
started
working
on
basically
deploying
swapper
to
arbitrary
I'm
at
a
good.
J
Like
I
made
good
progress
with
it,
I
should
have
deployed
the
basically
the
core
contracts,
the
periphery
contracts,
the
token
register,
which
is
needed-
and
I
was
working
on
the
front
end,
which
already
works
it
interfaces
with
with
arbitrary,
but
I
have
some.
I
try
to
perform
basically
to
add
liquidity
to
a
pair
and
to
create
a
pair,
but
it
does
not.
Work
still
have
to
to
check
out.
Why
and
that's
it
basically.
B
Cases
such
as
like
a
dxd
guild
where
the
dxd
voters
would
have
an
allocated
amount
of
reputation
and
be
able
to
basically
vote
just
like
rep
holders
via
this
guild,
like
these
contracts
are
now
under
audit,
and
that
audit
should
be
complete
middle
of
next
week.
So
yeah
we'll
see
that
so
we're
moving
along.
Basically
on
on
all
these
fronts
and
it's
yeah,
pretty
great.
Thank
you
very
good-
has
been
busy.
I
We
haven't
even
I've,
even
we
even
moved
forward
with
more
stuff.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
talked
about
the
extras:
I've
been
helping
augusto
on
dxtrust
design
or
sorry,
it's
not
designed
it's
just
adding
new
features,
fixing
fixing
up
some
stuff.
We
added
a
design
where
you
could
swap
instead
of
just
buying
from
the
curve.
So
the
extras
is
the
place
where
you
can
go
by
dxd
and
it
means
money
goes
to
treasury.
So
right
now,
obviously
people
go
by
on
the
secondary
market.
I
So
we
either
had
the
choice
to
say:
hey
it's
cheaper
elsewhere,
a
link
or
we
actually
implement
swapper
into
the
interface
and-
and
we
showed
that
path,
and
I
added
that
design
and
august
is
going
to
build
that,
and
we
also
added
more
price
points
to
the
curve
where
you
can
see
both
sell
price
by
price,
sell
price
and
market
price.
In
the
same
view-
and
I
think
it's
it's
it's
going
to
be
better.
B
B
It
basically
would
go
both
ways
like
sometimes
people
were
buying
on
unit
swap
and
arbitrages
would
be
buying
off
the
curve
and
like
selling
into
unit
swap
or
it
would
be-
maybe
the
other
way
around
where
people
were
buying
on
the
curve
when
they
really
should
have
been
buying
on
a
uniform,
because
the
market
price
was
lower
so
having
that
direct
integration
basically
solves
these
these
problems.
Of
course,
the
plan
is
to
pause
the
curve,
so
maybe
it
makes
less
of
a
difference,
but
it
would
still
be
cool
to
have
that
integration.
I
B
I
No,
but
I
I
planned
it
in
my
head
at
least
I'm
waiting
to
know
the
details
and
and
like
if
we
yeah
it
depends
on
how
we
go
about
that,
but
that's
why
I
wanted
to
add
all
the
prices
in
one
view,
instead
of
having
to
click
somewhere
else
to
see
the
market
price,
because
probably
people
land
on
the
extra
site
and
they
can't
buy
from
the
curve.
But
I
don't
I
don't
want
that
to
be
a
stopper
like
you
could
go
swap
from
swapper.
I
It
would
be
good
exactly
yeah.
That's
awesome!
That's
like
another
thing.
Also
now
like
this
is
the
first
step
I
started
working
on
the
dxtrust
design,
which
was
made
up
by
geronimo.
I
updated
it
a
little
bit
so
maybe
in
geronimo
can
sync
on
that.
We'll
probably
use
the
same
design
to
do
dx
vote,
which
august
also
is
going
to
be
voting
on,
and
this
is
the
next
thing
I'm
going
to
be
working
on
with
it.
K
B
I
A
I
D
Yeah
yeah,
also
like
from
my
perspective,
like
it,
makes
total
sense
like
if
we
want
to
build
it
as
an
open
extendable
system
with
different
kind
of
sales.
Mechanisms
like
the
bonding
curve,
could
be
just
one
of
the
available
modules
that
that
projects
can
use
to
find
capital.
So
it
would
fit
perfectly
in
the
in
the
idea.
There.
K
Yeah
kind
of
like
what
I'm
thinking
about
this
is
that
you
know,
because
this
is
done
like
through
the
extras
and
because
there
needs
to
be
a
sort
of
a
dow
or
you
know,
controlled,
address
we're
actually
incentivizing
more
responsible,
fundraising
from
like
all
aspects,
so
yeah.
Just
this
just
the
thought.
E
And
so
I
wonder
if,
when
we're
trying
to
do
the
dxd
guild,
whether
we
could
either
initially
just
use
the
lp
token
for
the
dxd
eth
pool
on
swapper,
and
that
would
be
a
way
of
like
giving
you
know
participating
in
governance.
If
you
wanted
to
do
that,
you
would
actually
be
like
staking.
Basically,
your
gxd
in
the
swapper
pool,
because
I
think,
like
staking
dxd
is
good.
E
I
guess
that
takes
it
off
the
market,
but
we
kind
of
want
to
like
put
those
things
to
use,
and
maybe
we
could
do
that
for
different
swapper
pools.
But
perhaps
that
would
be
a
way
of
like
you
know,
encourage
getting
dxd
holders
that
want
to
participate
in
governments
by
also
contributing
to
the
products.
I
I
I
think
it
is.
I
remember
when
I
added
voting
on
swapper,
not
only
for
pools,
so
that
was
one
of
like
my.
My
idea
is
it's
like
if,
if
we
allow
people
to
be
able
to
vote
on
on
like
we
are
already
calling
it
governance
and
it's
it's
about
pool
fees,
but
I
I
said
why
not
just
let
them
be
able
to
vote
on
signal
stuff
on
swapper
with
with
the
lp
token,
not
with
the
dxe
token
on
anything.
Actually,
it's
it's
not
only
dx
dxd
stuff.
E
The
same,
I
guess
I'm
thinking
I
think
that's
from
like
the
swapper
angle.
I
guess
I'm
thinking
from
like
the
governance
dxd
guild
angle,
like
we
are
kind
of
planning
to
introduce
some
governance
to
dxd
holders
by
like
having
them
lock
up
dxd
in
the
contract,
and
I'm
guess
I'm
saying
like
shouldn't.
We
rather
have
them
put
that
dxd
and
swapper
and
then
lock
it
up
in
the
contract.
E
H
Yeah,
this
was
something
that
chris-
and
I
were
talking
about
earlier
this
week,
is
a
possibility,
because,
first
of
all
it
okay,
it
attracts
dxd
to
swapper,
which
is
great,
so
there's
obviously
a
great
benefit
for
not
only
the
dow
but
also
dxd
holders
to
participate
in
in
swapper,
but
instead
of
just
having
the
dxd
sit
in
a
vesting
contract
somewhere,
why
not
have
swapper
essentially
be
the
source
of
the
the
vesting
contract?
Essentially,
so
it's
not
just
there.
It's
not
just
sitting
somewhere.
H
It's
actually
getting
some
sort
of
like
a
liquidity,
providing
aspect
to
it,
which
is
beneficial
for
both.
You
know
the
dow
and
for
the
liquidity
providers,
and
it
might
resolve
some
of
our
issues
as
to
maybe
attract
it's.
You
know
it's
an
economic
as
well
as
a
governance
perspective.
Choice
like
chris
was
saying.
B
I
would
think
at
the
very
least
you
would
not
want
dxd
voting
to
be
competing
with
using
dxd
in
dx
now's
products
right.
So
so
I
I
think
another
way
you
could
do.
It
is
very
similar
to
what
you
guys
were
saying,
but
you
could
also
simply
like
enable
multiple
options
for
basically,
if
you're,
if
it's
just
dxd,
you
can
vote
with
it.
If
it's
dac
locked
up
in
swapper,
you
can
vote
for
it
and
maybe
in
the
future
we
add
other
things
like.
B
I
I
mean
it
would
be
cool
if
we
added
a
future
to
be
able
to
put
up
one
side
of
the
liquidity
for
the
for
for
a
pool
like
let's
say
I
just
add,
dxd
and
I'll
wait
until
someone
else
put
up
the
e
side
right.
So
he's
split
the
the
pool
that
way
you
you
could
do
that
by
just
yeah
you
could
you
could
do
that
kind
of
voting.
B
Yeah
yeah,
I
feel
like
I'm
not
sure
if
I
would
support
the
idea
of
excluding
simple
dxd
holders
like
if
you
just
are
holding
dxt
and
want
to
participate
in
governance.
I
I
feel
like
it
might
not
be
good
to
exclude
them,
but
certainly
including
lp
providers
like
they,
I
think,
makes
a
ton
of
sense.
At
the
very
least.
H
Right,
I
think
it's
just
definitely
definitely
not
excluding
just
by
holding.
I
completely
agree
with
that.
I
just
think
that
the
one
nice
thing
about,
maybe
with
the
liquidity
providing
it,
could
work
in
the
same
way
that
we're
talking
about
with
governance
2.0
as
part
of
that
formula
about
some
sort
of
commitment
there
and
playing
with
that
formula.
H
B
Yeah-
and
that
said
like
it,
was
talking
about
what
single-sided
liquidity
with
your
dixie.
Like
I
mean,
even
if
you
were
providing
liquidity
in
a
dxd
pool,
and
you
had
provided
both
tokens
like
it's
a
little
extra
math,
but
we
should
be
able
to
at
least
if
not
the
current
version
and
the
future
version
of
the
guilds
be
able
to
like
do
that,
math
to
basically
see
how
much
dxd
you
have
with
your
lp
tokens.
B
E
Yeah,
just
two
quick
things
on
this,
so
partly
inspired
by,
I
think
wi-fi.
In
the
past
week,
they've
obviously
gone
through
a
lot
of
discussion
and
changes,
but
they're
like
shifting
away
from
wi-fi
staking
so
for
a
long
time
like
the
way
that
you
would
get
rewards
and
vote.
I'm
sorry
in
fees
is,
you
would
just
stake
your
wi-fi
right,
so
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
are
just
taking
their
wi-fi
and
they're
getting
fees
for
that
they're
trying
to
move
away
from
that.
E
Just
because
again,
it's
like
well,
if
I'm
just
taking
the
wi-fi
like.
Is
that
really
providing
anything
to
the
platform
and
then
second
from
a
product
perspective?
I
I
think
I
think
going
forward.
Projects
will
increasingly
want
their
governance
to
be
their
governance,
tokens
to
be
liquid
and,
like
somehow
traded
and
somehow
being
put
to
work.
I
mean
you
can
see
this
with
a
lot
of
different
projects.
Now
that
are
like,
you
know,
come
and
stake
on
a
sushi
swap
pool
or
uniswap
pool.
I
I
mean
that
was
the
whole
idea
about
when
I,
when
I
did
the
design
for
because
it
made
sense
to
if
someone
put
up
liquidity,
they
can
already
vote
with
the
liquidity,
but
only
on
fees.
Why
not
vote
on
more
stuff?
This
is
what
I
thought
I
mean.
Obviously
we
maybe
it's
confusing
to
be
voting
on
a
project
on
like
a
swap
service
like
swapper.
E
But
you
could
do
it,
you
could
do
it
now
with
snapshot
right.
You
could
imagine
snapchat
like
setting
up
a
snapshot,
governance
where
you're
using
the
lp
token
itself
right
and
they
project
would
hopefully
be
drawn
to
swapper,
because
in
addition
to
using
that
lp
token
for
governance
on,
like
whatever
you're
wanting
to
do
like
you,
could
control
fees
on
the
pool
itself.
With
that
same
thing
again,
I
think
long
term
it'd
be
really
cool.
B
Interesting
too,
because
we've
long
talked
about
governance
as
a
service,
but
I
think
it's
like,
for
the
most
part,
thus
far
been
like
kind
of
this
abstract
idea,
without
anything
really
tangible
to
offer
and
to
back
it
up
and
so
like.
But
something
like
this.
You
started
the
year
60
guilds.
What
that's
talking
about
here
and
you
start
to
see
how
this
actually
could
be
something
that
tx
now
provides.
I
I
I
H
H
I
think
in
the
past
week,
or
so
so
it's
definitely
showing
a
shift
away
from
just
staking,
and
you
know
having
some
sort
of
apy
yield,
not
that
we
were
even
planning
on
doing
that
with
our
our
vesting,
like
any
type
of
locking
mechanism
for
our
governance
protocol,
but
it
would
be
interesting
just
to
make
the
communication
that
you
know
we
have
this
ecosystem,
where
you
can
make
your
dxd
work
for
you
through
our
products.
So
we're
not
even
you
know
we're
even
it's
another
kind
of
interesting
thing.
H
B
E
K
K
We
had
an
okr
kind
of
like
further
work
with
venky,
which
I
also
think
this
is
a
great
initiative
and
it's
really
coming
along
fairly
nicely,
hopefully
yeah
by
the
end
of
next
week,
we'll
be
able
to
have
sort
of
a
working
version
and
then
the
following
week.
You
know
ratify
that
in
the
dow
and
we
had
we
had
kind
of
like
a
long
discussion
on
omen
and
the
marketing
of
omen
with
beth.
K
E
Yeah
some
things:
the
governance
call
had
a
discussion
on
community
rep
boost
and
also
like
a
broader
discussion
on
how
we
can
distribute
ref
more
efficiently,
maybe
introducing
the
mid
burn
function
in
the
multi-call
and
also
just
figuring
out
how
we
can
scale
that
and
then
yeah.
We
had
tons
of
kind
of
interesting
proposals.
E
The
multi-call
proposal
is
still
ongoing.
I
think
it's
like
a
week
away
from
potentially
passing
and
there's
some
testing
going
on
and
xdi.
I
think
john
maybe
can
give
an
update,
john
and
nico,
maybe
an
update
on
that,
and
then
we
had
the
treasury
authorization
proposal,
which
was
submitted
last
week,
and
this
would
be
a
way
of
beginning
to
diversify
the
treasury
primarily
into
stable
coins.
E
So
the
goal
was
about
three
million
in
stable
coins
and
then
there
were
three
different
ways
that
go
about
that
and
the
member
balancer
structure
using
the
dev
multi-sig
and
then,
of
course,
the
multi
call
gnosis
protocol
relay
and
the
gnosis
protocol
relayer,
which
is
the
long-term
sustainable
solution.
So
the
idea
is
to
kind
of
use
all
of
those
and
work
up
to
that
number,
and
so
I
think
that's
set
to
pass.
E
I
think
in
two
days,
and
so
when
that
will
pass
we'll,
hopefully
can
can
see
some
of
those
proposals
themselves
and
begin
to
diversify
there
and
then
yeah.
Then
there's
also
a
discussion
on
funding
for
the
omen
squad.
So
the
omen
squad
has
kind
of
been
investigating
and
exploring
researching
how
to
provide
liquidity
on
open
markets
and
how
to
and
providing
some
feedback
on
that.
So
they
had
done
this
on
mainnet
before
and
there's
some
additional
funding
for
the
xdi
launch.
E
So
hopefully
the
goal
is
to
have
a
bunch
of
fun
markets
to
play
with
on
xdi,
particularly
for
the
super
bowl
coming
up.
I
think
in
two
and
a
half
weeks
might
be
a
popular
market
there
and
then
yeah
the
onboarding
guide.
We
had
a
discussion
on
that.
I
think
we're
inching
towards
some
resolution
on
that.
There's
a
poll
on
how
to
structure
the
trial,
pay
worker
period
and
then
yeah
the
last
kind
of
thing,
a
discussion
on
the
call
was
kind
of
how
to
incorporate
xdi
more
into
governance.
E
You
know
this
is
something
that
I
think
we've
been
flirting
around
with
the
dick
style
base
on
xdi
and
now
it's
I
think,
starting
to
get
some
familiarity
with
people
in
the
community,
and
we
should,
I
think,
be
using
it
more
and
more
for
signal
proposals,
reimbursements
and
other
things.
So
there's
there's
some
ideas.
I
think,
to
to
kind
of
continue
experiment
with
that,
which
I
think
will
be
good
and
as
omen,
obviously
moose
on
xdi.
That
will
provide
a
nice
impetus
to
that.
So
I
think
that
was
it.
E
Just
one
more
thing,
I
remember
we
also
talked
about
speaking
of
governance
of
the
servers
earlier.
We
also
talked
a
little
bit
about
dmm
and
participating
more
in
that
governance
system,
so
the
multi-call
team,
I
think,
will
help
with
the
ability
for
dick
style
to
delegate
its
dmm
voting
rights
to
a
specific
address.
So
I
think
we'll
do
that
to
the
multisig
and
then
figure
out
how
to
kind
of
how
we'll
get
signal
on
that.
A
E
And
just
like
thinking
about,
if
we
can
figure
out
a
way
to
provide
like
governance
decisions
in
a
decentralized
way
for
the
dmm
and
deep
styles
treasury,
we
could
use
that
same
system.
Whether
you
know,
maybe
it's
something
a
little
bit
broader
than
like
a
multi-sig
thinking
about
maybe
even
created
like
a
the
guild
structure.
For
that
that
same
thing
could
be
applied
to
uniswap
compound,
and
I
think
some
other
systems
that
have
that,
and
so
not
just
like
the
ability
to
get
signal
and
come
to
reach
consensus.
B
One
other
thing
I
I
forgot
or
just
neglected
to
mention
earlier
is:
we
are
working
on
this
kind
of
payroll
system
block
rocket.
It
was
a
little
bit
slow
to
reply,
but
it
seems
they're
moving
on
getting
that
kind
of
estimated,
so
it
would
be
would
be
great.
I
think
that
could
really
help
minimize
the
costs
for
worker
proposals
and
also
kind
of
just
make
it
a
lot
easier
and
more
transparent
for
the
community
as
well.
So
hopefully,
some
good
stuff
coming
there
as
well.
I
Points
that
we
should
mention
before
we
close
yes
also
now
you
mentioned
external
teams
working
I'm
in
contact
with
two
bureaus
that
works
with
the
blockchain
projects,
and
we
are
talking
with
them
about
creating
landing
pages
so,
first
of
all
our
dxd
website,
and
also
if
each
of
our
products
should
have
a
landing
page
each.
So
that's
that's
something
going
on
right
now,.
B
I
was
gonna
say
I
think
in
general
you
know
that
there's
a
preference
for
these
full-time
community
members
and
workers
to
be
doing
work.
But
I
think
there
are
definitely
opportunities
where
we
can
kind
of
boost
things
and
kind
of
augment.
What
we're
doing
by
pulling
in
service
providers
to
help
out
here
and
there.
I
H
I
Short
term,
it's
it's
worth
it,
and
also
we
need
to
be
attractive
in
this
market
because
we
have
a
bull
market.
I
think
our
brand
is
something
we
need
to
keep
developing.
I
don't
think
we
have
done
anything
since
since
geronimo
actually
created
it
for
for
the
bonding
curve
period,
so
I
think
just
as
long
as
we
keep
for
going
forward-
and
this
is
a
good
step
to
start.
B
I
I
learned
something
actually
creating
websites.
It's
super
simple,
but
for
some
reason
on
every
project
I've
been
to
it's
always
something
that
gets
complicated
and
it
takes
more
time
and
more
money
than
it
would
have.
If,
if
you
just
did
it
externally,
I
think
I
think
I
think
actually
it's
worth
it
to
do
it.
If
you
don't
have
people
for
it.
But
if
you
do
then
yeah.
B
And
I
think,
there's
an
argument
that,
like
for
something
like
a
landing
page,
the
outside
perspective
is
actually
valuable
right
because
we
don't.
We
forget
what
it's
like
to
look
in
from
the
outside
and
not
have
all
the
context
that
we
do
right.
So
in
some
ways
we're
like
the
worst
people
to
like
actually
like
put
the
content
out
to
to
convey
the
messages,
because
we
forget
like
what
all
the
things
that
we've
learned
along
the
way
and
how
much
more,
we
know
sure
but
yeah
cool
yeah.
I
mean,
I
think
it's.
K
And
I'll
add
one
small
thing
that
next
week,
on
tuesday
after
the
governance,
2.0
call
we're
having
basically
an
alchemy
working
group
which
we
started
outlining.
You
know
what
are
the
things
that
we're
gonna
talk
there,
but
I
think
this
is
a
great,
a
great
opportunity
to
actually
drive
and
converge
on,
basically,
the
future
of
alchemy
so
come
along.
There's
a
post
on
dow
talk.