►
From YouTube: DXdao Weekly Meeting #34 (Recap) [2021-03-04]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Hi
everyone
welcome
to
the
march
4th
2021
dx,
dow
community
call
I
I'm
sky,
I'm
taking
over
this
call
from
john.
This
is
my
first
time,
so
forgive
me
if
I
mess
it
up,
but
this
every
couple
weeks
we
change
or
every
week
we
change.
What
this
call
is
about,
and
this
week
is
going
to
be
a
recap
of
like
dx.
B
Dow
is
basically
over
the
last
two
weeks:
we're
going
to
run
through
the
different
products,
get
updates
from
the
squad
leader
of
each
product
and
then
we'll
go
through
a
couple
of
the
calls
from
the
week
and
then
at
the
end,
there's
a
handful
of
topics,
relevant
topics
that
we've
been
discussing
the
last
couple
weeks,
that
if
we
have
time
we
can
dive
into
those
as
well.
So
as
per
normal,
we
will
start
with
omen
and
hopefully
get
an
update
from
geronimo.
C
Yes,
we
are
in
preparation
for
releasing
a
new
version.
Hopefully
this
week
it
includes
three
bigger
improvements.
C
First
is
the
bridge
ui,
which
allows
omen
users
on
mainnet
to
bridge
dye
to
extine
and
then
the
opposite
way.
If
the
user
is
connected
to
xdi,
they
can
bridge
the
x-style
to
mainnet
again.
C
C
So
I'm
really
happy
to
have
that
included
now
and
we
polished
the
connection
flow
and
yeah.
So
that's
that
we're
in
the
process
of
like
getting
a
proper
working
group
going
in
terms
of
like
finalizing
the
governance
system
from
the
for
the
omen
guild
and
defining
like
a
specification
for
the
omen
token-
and
that's
mainly.
B
And
I
think
we
have
a
couple
more
in
the
last
couple
weeks,
maybe
one
dev
and
and
then
I
think,
pulp
mackinac
plans
to
focus
more
on
the
the
omen
squad
in
terms
of
like
omen,
guild
and
omen
token,
and
some
of
the
governance
around
omen
as
well.
So,
like
omen,
team
has
grown
a
little
bit
in
the
last
couple
weeks
too.
Right.
C
Yeah,
exactly
like,
I
think
the
the
worker
working
group
is
like
me:
tammy
is
basically
leading
leading
it
and
I
pulp
machina
is
joining
now
too,
and
augusto
is
basically
the
lead,
developer,
who's
receiving
the
specification
and
then
going
to
implement
it.
E
Maybe
I
show
my
face:
yes
on
mesa
side,
that
happened
quite
a
lot,
so
we
have
like
the
final
design
for
from
bertie
and
he
did
like
a
desk
design
and
this
one.
We
started
to
implement
like
two
weeks
ago,
almost
or
10
10
days
ago,
and
we
also
have
a
mobile
design,
and
I
know
maybe
it
might
make
sense
to
share
it
to
everyone.
Yeah
I'll
put
it
afterwards
in
in
the
chat
and
then
yeah.
E
We
had
like
three
works
workers
ending
a
trial
and
they
all
of
them
are
now
like
full-time
workers.
Then
they
only
did
the
proposed
for
the
trials,
but
the
full-time
work
proposal,
I
think,
will
come
up
on
next
time.
E
The
next
few
days
we
have
like
hamza,
who
is
level
one
he's
working
on
the
on
the
front
end
of
mesa
and
he's
now
really
he's
working
the
overview
part
they
split
it
and
lee
is
working
on
the
single
page
of
mesa
single
page
view
represented
in
one
auction,
and
then
we
have
rui
who
helps.
E
Nikko
on
the
smart
contract
side
and
then
adam
adam
is
working
on
infrastructure,
stuff
and
testing
environment
for
the
subgraph
and
then
what
else
are
what's
out
there
so
because
we,
the
baby
forked,
the
easy
auction
contract
and
gnosis
now
named
it
gnosis
auction,
and
we
have
we
share
like
symbol.
The
code
we
have
is
quite
similar.
E
We
use
the
point
where
they
changed
the
licenses
from
gpl
to
some
other
licenses,
but
there
there's
a
bounty
out
there
who
is
like
5
000
usd
and
to
find
problems
in
the
dutch,
no
hypnosis
auction
contract,
who
is
very
similar
to
our
contract
and
so
in
a
way
yeah.
We
profit
from
them.
If
somebody
is
finding
finding
anything,
it's
not
so
we
added
some
stuff
and
and
but
it
shares
part
of
it
and
yeah.
We
still
don't
have
a
name
for
like
now.
I
call
start
the
quality,
the
not
easy
auction.
E
I
start
to
call
it
point
dutch,
and
what
was
that
point
touch
point
yeah,
because
you
know
in
a
way
it's
a
dutch
dutch
auction
who
is
resolved
on
a
point.
So
the
long
world
is
like
the
point,
dutch
auction
and
because
easy
easy.
It's
strange
that
we
still
use
the
name
who.
E
E
E
Takes
some
more
time
but-
and
we
are
getting,
I
think,
much
more
productive
because
the
coordination
calls
we
have
daily.
I
think,
helps
us
and
also
venky
yeah
venky.
E
He
has
helped
us
setting
up
the
the
scrum
style
working
and
in
a
way
we
had
some
progress,
because
now
it's
just
a
natural
way
to
work
for
us,
and
I
think
it's
good
for
the
team
to
to
it's
good
for
us
as
a
team,
and
we
also
because
we
can't
implement
it
in
just
one
sprint.
So
we
need
time
and
but
I
see
progress
there.
B
Great
yeah
we
have,
we
still
have
incoming
interest
around
ibos
from
a
handful
of
projects.
We
have
a
few
different
scenarios.
Internal
scenarios
related
to
maybe
using
mesa
for
internal
actions,
so
it'll
be
exciting
to
like
start
when
it's
ready
to
start
testing
it
in
some
small
in
some
small
way.
E
E
Where
is
the
money
going
and
if
you're
doing
like
a
an
ideal
on
a
chain,
and
everyone
has
to
bring
the
money
to
the
chain
until
they
can
use
it,
then
it's
it's
much
harder
process
in
a
way,
and
so
I
know
we
see
on
which
chain
we
will
start
publish
it
first,
but
I
think
it
will
not
be
maintained
because
in
a
way
we
want
to
do
to
try
it
out
and
have
some
small
sales
and
my
goal.
My
idea
is
to
to
try
it
out
with
just
token
sale.
E
We
sell
one
eth
over
the
auction
and
announce
it,
and
then
we
see
what's
going
on
and
how
people
using
the
interface
and
we
get
some
feedback
and
then
we
can
improve
and
in
a
way
yeah.
I
I
did
like
on
my
weekly.
I
did
have
a
short
presentation
and
about
some
you
know
the
research
is
hybrid,
but
some
one
hopper
did
like
did
a
sale
on
on
xti.
E
It
was
like
a
fixed
price
sale.
They
did
on
on
next
time,
and
mainly
it
was
because
they
needed
to
raise
capital
to
use
it
on
the
liquidity,
balancer
pool
and
they
used
for
their
real
sale.
So
there
you
see,
you
know
you,
people
use
it
on
on
the
if
it's
very
dedicated
and
the
target
group
in
a
way,
it's
very
professional,
because
only
people
who
have
been
running
notes
have
been
allowed
to
be
on
the
private
sale,
and
so
these
are
like
the
pros
and
for
them
it's.
E
I
think
it's
no
issues
you
should
do
need
like
to
use
x,
excited
for
this,
and
it
was
the
biggest
extra
sale
and
whatever
happened.
There
was
two
and
a
half
million
exile.
I
guess,
and
then
they
moved
the
liquidity
to
mainnet
and
used
it
there
for
the
liquidity,
products
or
bootstrapping
pool
who
is
in
a
way
I
took
part
in
in
some
of
them
and
in
a
way
I
see
it.
It's
a
little
bit
like
a
fake,
fixed
price
sale,
it's
yeah!
I
I
don't
think
it's
in
the
long
run.
B
Okay,
I
think
that's
cool
and
I
guess
what
you're
describing
with
mesa
is
what
dx
dao
is
preparing
to
do
for
all
of
our
products
existing
in
a
multi-chain
world
and
deciding
where
to
go
and
when
to
go
there
and
in
some
cases,
moving
between
chains
and.
F
E
E
I
think
if
you
start
fresh
product,
then
it's
even
more
important
important
to
think
where
you
going
to
do
it
now,
it's
very
difficult
to
to
make
any
and
decisions
because
you
don't
know
how
it
develops.
But
if
arbitrary
ends
up
with
a
lot
of
capital,
people
have
capital
there,
then
it
would
be
a
good
solution
to
use
it,
because
I
think
that.
E
B
Cool
great
thanks,
so
next
we'll
move
to
swapper
and
I
think
we
have
some
interesting
updates
from
zett.
G
Yeah
we
have
some
exciting
things
coming
up,
so
it's
crazy
timing
actually,
because
we
just
started
working
on
the
layer,
2
interface
and
the
network
switcher,
and
we
we
got
patrick
helping
us
building
that
and
same
day
we
get
an
update
from
metamask,
saying,
hey,
we
are
doing
this
now
and
and
network
switching
is
built
into
meet
metamask.
G
G
I
would
say
it's
better
and
much
simpler
and
we
can
expand
it
too
much
more
with
the
design
I
made
now.
We
just
need
to
try
it
out.
No
one
has
done
this
right
so
kind
of
first
here
and
even
the
documentation
doesn't
tell
you
everything
so
we're
doing
the
network
switching
for
swapper
and
we
will
be
able
to
try
it
out
really
really
soon.
Maybe
you
can
talk
about
ex
deploying
xdi.
H
Yeah,
so
I
think
also
it's
important
to
mention
the
smart
routing,
which
is
pretty
much
done
and
ready
to
be
deployed
and
for
x-die
we
are,
you
know,
preparing
the
the
deployment
there
and
we're
probably
just
you
know:
exp
expand
to
xdi
and
be
there
more
just
just
more
bring
some
liquidity
and
as
far
as
the
deployment
itself,
I'm
you
know
we're
preparing.
H
You
know
last
details,
I
think,
by
by
the
end
of
the
week,
we
we
we
can
be,
we
can
be
ready
and
that
that's
pretty
much
all
I
think
from
my
side
and
well.
I
think
we
can
maybe
talk
a
bit
about
the
the
multi
multi-chain
work
that
we
are
doing
and
also
that
also
includes
the
the
sub
graph
and
the
the
dx
stats.
Basically,
so
we
are
working
there
also
to
have
multi-chain
stats
about
liquidity,
and
that's
I
mean
that's
basically
all
for
me.
I
think
yeah.
G
I
mean
we
kind
of
are
like
we,
we
needed
to
focus
on
farming,
but
this
is
too
big
to
not
like
it's
low
hanging
apples.
We
we,
we
prepared
a
lot
of
this,
these
stuff
for
layer,
twos
and
we
we
have
routing
done
and-
and
I
would
say
it's
good
if
we
release
it
for
testing
release
it,
so
we
can
try
it
out
and-
and
meanwhile
farming
is
a
big,
much
much
bigger
task.
We
we
thought
we
would
be
finished
earlier,
but
we
we,
I
think
we
yeah.
G
We
had
some
bad
estimates
on
that,
so
we'll
release
the
xdi
and
and
the
routing
and
meanwhile
we'll
do
the
farming.
What
we
test.
H
Yeah,
so
basically
it's
a
sort
of
of
routing
that
is
done,
like
purely
like
entirely
and
the
client
side
of
things.
So
basically,
prices
are
checked.
H
On
different
platforms,
and
basically
the
best
price
is
always
chosen
and
when
you
actually
perform
a
trade,
for
example,
let's
say
on
on
mainnet:
you
are
trying
to
swap
token
a
for
token
b
and
prices
are
checked
on
swapper,
for
example,
for
units
from
on
unity
swap
and
on
sushi,
swap,
for
example,
and
let's
say
that
the
best
price
is
on
unit,
swap
the
call
like
the
swap
call.
The
transaction
will
actually
be
direct
to
uni,
swap
so
it's
very
important
to
say
that
you
don't
pay
any
additional
fees.
H
It's
almost
like
you
know,
going
to
the
uni
swap
app
and
and
and
doing
the
trade
there,
but
instead
you
do
it
on
on
swapper
and
that's
basically
it
it's
just.
You
know
the
the
dap,
this
whopper
dab
searches
for
the
best
price
among
different
platforms,
and
it
performs
the
the
trade
on
the
platform
so
that
you
don't
pay
any
any
additional
gas,
and
that's
it.
G
We
will
be
like
kind
of
early
on
layer
two
and
then
and
liquidity
will
not
be
as
good
as
on
mainnet
so
being
able
to
to
have
this,
I
would
wouldn't
call
it
aggregator,
because
it's
not
our
business,
we're
just
routing
so
having
this
router
would
make
swapper
super
relevant,
especially
now
early
in
the
in
the
layer,
2
game.
I
So
yeah
I
I
wanna
like
I
just
had
sort
of
like
a
thought
about
this.
I
I
think
maybe
the
term
is
like
mediation,
because
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
are
familiar,
but
I
was
working
in
ad
tech
and
this
is
what
we
did.
We
had
like
basically
mediation
that
you
get.
I
You
know
you
get
traffic
from
the
best
source
and
then
we
also
have
our
kind
of
track
traffic
source,
and
I
think
this
is
similar
to
what
we're
doing
here,
because
you
know
we'll
have
like
all
the
different
possible
exchanges
and
then
I
guess
one
of
us
one
will
also
be
the
swapper
liquidity.
J
I,
like
smart
routing,
smart,
seems
to
be
like
something
people
throw
into
things
and,
like
I.
J
G
I
think
like
routing
is
good
because
it's
a
word
people
know
right,
it's
something
you
can
almost
understand,
but
if
we
have
another
word,
there
is
like
almost
directly
describable.
What's
happening,
I
mean
aggregator
is
not
a
good
word
either,
and
people
use
it
right.
Yeah.
F
I
think
aggregator
is
kind
of
incorrect.
In
this
case
I
mean
at
least
as
people
understand
it.
I
think,
compared
to
like
one
inch.
The
other
word
I
think
that
might
be
accurate
is,
is
switching
because
it's
kind
of
what
you're
doing
you're
switching
between
either
sushi
swap
your
swapper
or
swapper.
G
G
If
we
check
the
like
normal
web
2
world,
if
this
site
existed
and
it
didn't
have
their
own
pool,
we
would
just
call
it
like
price
comparison
right.
It
would
be
like
a
comparison
site.
Would
it
wouldn't
be
so
techy
in
the
name
right?
You
just
be
compare
the
prices
and
do
your
trade
or
something
like
that.
G
B
Let
me
put
this
in
here
and
see
which
of
those
three
is
the
easiest,
rather
than
going
to
the
three
sites
to
figure
it
out,
and
I
know
that
those
are
the
three
cheapest
transaction
fee
places.
Basically,
and
so
this
is
like
the
really
easy
way
to
just
get
done
what
you
need
to
get
done
through
the
through
one
of
those
simple
swap
services.
G
So
why
wouldn't
we
just
call
it
something
like
it's
easy
like
smart
swap
right,
it's
smart
and
it
just
does
the
thing
it
doesn't
need.
We
don't
need
to
explain
the
technical
things
it's
just
this.
Is
it
and
and
whatever
we're
gonna
add
to
it
later
it
will
work
right.
So
if
we
will
do
more
stuff,
yeah.
J
Those
are
all
great
things
you
said,
john
though
there's
reasons
to
to
use
it.
I
do
like
smart,
I
think
smart
swap
is
another
one,
and
it's
also
very
good,
because
then
we
get
like
the
swap
swapper
like
that's
like
a
almost
reinforces
the
brand
a
little
there
I
mean
it
could
be
smart.
I
guess
not.
Smart
swapper.
G
Yeah
agusto,
why
don't
you
like
the
use
of
word
smart?
I
just
it's
good
too.
D
D
Yeah
exactly
I
remember
when
I
when
I
was
working
on
my
token
standard
that
I
kind
of
left
it
aside
when
I
was
talking
with
I
palladino
this
guy
paladino,
who
worked
in
separating,
and
I
was
calling
a
smart
token.
He
told
me
like-
and
I
remember
his
advice
to
avoid
using
the
word
smart
or
at
or
objective
adjectives
in
front
of
things
for
me
that
I
wanted
to
give
a
name,
because
I
mean
this
is
how
I
see
it,
but
it's
really
smart.
It
wasn't
really
smart
token.
G
Yeah
I
mean
we,
we
need
to
swallow
some
of
our
like.
I
don't
know
what
you
call
it,
but
like
just,
we
need
to
call
it
something
it's
it
needs
to
be
it's
good
that
people
will
ask
like
why?
Is
it
smart?
What
what?
What?
F
F
F
J
I
I
I
think,
like
the
like,
the
web
2
term
is
mediation
like
that's
what
it
does
it
takes
like
a
bunch
of
like
let's
say,
traffic
sources,
or
something
and
and
yeah
and
mediates
between
them
and
gives
you
the
best
one.
I
wasn't.
F
I
Well,
that's
why
I
mean
I
don't
know,
that's
why
my
old
company
is
ipo
at
like
a
couple
billion
dollars,
valuation.
B
B
We
can
even
have
a
competition
for
it
right,
but
for
now
I
think
we
need
to
move
to
the
next
topic
and
the
next
topic
is
dxdao's,
most
one
of
its
most
important
products,
the
product
of
governance,
and
so
I
don't
agus
augusto
if
you
have
any
progress
or
updates
related
to
the
dx
vote
or
things
that
you're
working
on.
That
would
be
great.
D
Yes,
I
do
I'm,
actually
I'm
working
a
lot
of
it,
and
this
is
why
I
I'm
super
delay
on
I.
I
should
have
proposed
post
my
workout
proposal,
but
I
was
just
working
on
the
expo
this
week
and
I'm
finishing
the
last
feature.
The
idea
is
the
last
thing
that
I
need
to
add
is
to
redeem
the
reputation
and
contributions
that
you
have
once
a
proposal
gets
executed.
D
We
successfully
executed
an
update
of
the
of
the
configuration
of
the
extras
on
ringkevi
through
the
export
we
created
a
propulsion.
I
voted
for
it
so
right
now,
what
we
have
on
rink
by
is
is
a
de-extras
redeployed,
the
export
redeployed
with
quicker
schemes
and
then
working
on
it.
Adding
these
last
feature
that
I
just
mentioned
the
redeem
and
yeah
working
on
optimizing.
D
Some
of
the
event
events
store
that
we
want
to
use,
because
all
the
boats
and
stakes
and
all
the
things
that
are
happening
on
the
boarding
machine
are,
are
stored
via
events
which
are
immutable,
and
the
idea
is
that
we
are
going
to
be
storing
this
on
the
user,
local
storage
or
maybe
some
cashier
solution.
D
So,
working
on
this
and
yeah
it's
working
pretty
good.
You
can
always
check
what
is
happening
on
the
github
link
on
the
github
pages
link.
I'm
going
to
share
it
now
and
we
have
always
the
latest
deployed
version
of
develop
on
rinkeby
store
there
yeah
just
working
on
it.
I
couldn't
present
it.
I
I
was
planning
to
post
an
update
on
what
we
have
on
rinkevi,
but
I
want
to
add
the
last
feature,
because
I
mean
it
kind
of
it's
not
difficult.
D
B
I
Next,
oh,
does
anyone
have
any
questions?
Yeah
so
like
I
mean
I
guess
before
we
move
to
business
stuff,
I
will
mention
that
I've
been
kind
of
like
chatting
with
geronimo
and
john
about
yeah.
Basically,
a
certain
proposal
made
by
people
who
have
or
are
leaving
dell
stack
to
develop,
govern
the
next
iteration
of
a
governance
platform
and
yeah.
I
I
hope
that
we'll
be
able
to
share
like
specs
and
stuff
by
monday
or
tuesday
latest,
but
yeah
like
this,
incorporates
like
governance,
2.0
and
a
lot
of
the
work
that
the
style
has
done
and
then
that
we've
done
inside
all
right,
yeah
yeah.
B
B
B
Build
it
now,
I
guess
and
and
we
have
a
lot
of
the
pieces
we
need
so
super
exciting
and
so
nylon.
Do
you
want
to
now
give
just
a
recap
of
biz
dev
goings
from
the
last
couple
weeks
or
the
last
call?
I
guess.
I
Yeah
sure
so
I
think
over
the
like
in
the
last
call,
we
had
one
is
kind
of
discussing
the
luna
social
potential
collaboration.
That's
been
ongoing
for
a
while
and
the
other
one
is
the
introduction
to
opolis
by
john
from
eastenders,
which
sorry,
I
guess,
john
from
opulence
and
yeah.
I
think
like,
as
we
discussed
in
the
call
one
of
the
interesting
things
for
that
is
like
the
adventures.
I
First,
investment
quote
unquote
and
yeah.
I
mean
personally,
I'm
very
bullish
on
this
and
yeah.
I
actually
spoke.
I
I
spoke
to
john
afterwards
and
he's
he's
got
an
interesting
take
like
he
really
wants
to
raise
funds
for
those
who
will
actually
use.
E
I
Not
you
know
yeah
any
more,
pcs
or
stuff
like
that
yeah.
I
think
this
is
a
great
fit
and
yeah.
I
can
see
like
more
things
coming
into
the
expenditures
in
the
future
and
yeah,
I'm
not
sure
what
else
we
talked
about
about
a
bunch
of
stuff.
B
Cool
yeah,
but
we're
gonna,
I
was
gonna
mention
dx
ventures
near
the
end,
but
just
since
you
mentioned
it,
there
is
a
live
signal
proposal
for
dx
style
community
to
vote
on
on
xdx
dao
on
on
the
idea
of
dx
ventures
and
approval
to
earmark
a
set
of
funds
related
to
dx
ventures.
B
And
if
that
passes,
it
outlines
kind
of
the
next
steps
for
how
to
make
individual
investments
into
certain
projects.
And
so
once
this,
if
this,
if
this
proposal
for
the
idea
of
dx
ventures
passes,
we
will
then
move
forward
with.
B
And
so
that's
that's
an
exciting
initiative
that
is
is
happening,
and
so
that's
you
know
related
to
biz
dev.
But
it
ties
in
with,
with
you
know,
all
the
different
products
and
and
actually
the
tools
that
dxdown
needs
as
a
decentralized
collective.
B
So
thanks
nylon,
the
next
would
be
the
governance
call
chris.
If
you
want
to
give
a
roundup
of
what's
happening
in
the
governance
world,.
J
Yeah,
so
we
I
think
this
week
was
the
first
week
we
kind
of
went
over
proposals
on
two
different
bases:
the
main
base
and
the
one
on
xdis.
So
still
a
lot
of
activity
on
the
main
base.
A
couple
last
couple
worker
proposals
there
and
then
also
a
couple
treasury
diversification
proposals
and
then
there's
two
different
proposals
that
I
wanted
to
flag.
That
one
is
three
day.
The
first
one
is
deposit
150
east
into
swapper
on
xdi.
J
So,
as
the
conversation
was
going
earlier
about
the
swapper
multi-chain,
the
we
want
to
put
some
liquidity
in
swapper
on
xdi,
so
that
it
can
be
kind
of
gain
some
revenue,
but
also
kind
of
help,
support
the
efforts
we're
doing
there,
so
that
will
go
through
the
dev
multisig
and
then
into
x,
dx,
dow
and
then
into
swapper
on
xdi,
and
then
second
is
a
proposal
to
deposit
a
hundred
eth
in
swapper
on
mainnet.
J
So
this
is
going
through
the
dev
multisig
and
then
through
a
newly
deployed
liquidity,
replayer.
And
then
the
tokens
will
sit
in
the
liquidity,
relayer
and
then
the
ownership
of
the
liquidity
relay
will
be
transferred
over
to
dxdau
and
that
we're
waiting
the
hold
up
we're
waiting
for
there
is.
We
need
a
new
multi-call
scheme
to
pass
which
will
take
17
days
so
we'll
test
it
with
this
first
proposal
of
100
eath
and
then
we'll
have
some
initial
liquidity
on
swapper
mainnet.
J
So
I
think
both
of
those
are
important
and
we'll
probably
want
to
think
about
doing
like
another.
One
of
those
in
the
in
the
coming
days
is
assuming
everything
goes
smooth
there
and
then
yeah.
We
have
now
x,
dx,
dow
or
dx
style
bass
on
xdi,
and
so
a
couple
different
worker
proposals
there
that
are
going
on.
So
this
is
kind
of
the
first
couple
days
that
we're
trying
to
do
worker
proposals
on
x
died.
J
There's
still
a
lot
of
questions
that
we
talked
through
on
the
call
really,
I
think
the
key
things
to
to
highlight
there
are
one
we
need
to
do.
A
quarterly
update
on
the
rep
rewards
on
mainnet,
so
nylon
or
I
guess
metronome
had
presented
a
some
ability
to
be
able
to
do
this
in
a
multi,
multiple
rep
rewards
in
a
single
transaction
and
it's
really
important.
I
think
that
we
as
we
keep
track
of
the
main
net
rep
awards.
We
need
to
have
that
done.
Every
quarter.
To
do
that.
J
So
we'll
be
tracking
that
and
then
second
is
to
include
this
information
in
the
proposal
right.
We
should
be
able
to
track
this
already,
but
it
should
would
be
very
easy
to
do
that.
I
shared
a
calculator
in
the
little
spreadsheet.
I
was
like
working
on
there,
but
there
still
were
a
couple
questions
on
how
we're
structuring
this
with
the
main
net.
J
So
I
wanted
to
open
actually
one
one
more
thing
for
structuring
it,
so
mainnet
rep,
so
x
die
now
has
like
850,
000,
rep
and
mainnet
base
has
1.51
million
reps,
so
these
are
in
absolute
amounts,
and
this
is
because
two
reasons
one
when
xdi
was
ported
and
mapped.
This
was
not
all
of
the
rep
was
mapped
for
inactive
gnosis.
Safe
addresses
because
gnosis
safe
could
not
be.
Report
could
be
ported
over
address
address
because
it's
a
smart
contract
wallet.
J
So
there
was
a
chunk
of
rep
that
was
missed
out
there
by
people
that
did
not
wrap
up
map
over
plus
the
mapping
was
done
in
october
november,
so
all
of
the
rep
that's
been
earned
since
then
is
not
included
on
there.
As
a
result,
there's
like,
as
I
said,
less
rep
there.
I
think
the
consensus
and
the
conclusion
is
any
amount
of
mainnet
rep
that
is
owned
by
an
address.
J
So
an
address
that
owns
mainnet
rep,
the
same
rep
amount
is
claimable
on
xdi,
and
so
I
think
there
is,
there
was
a,
I
think.
Hexel
had
a
proposal
and
then
there's
one
for
dev
violet,
basically
to
do
like
a
rep
sync,
and
so
the
consensus
and
correct
open
up
to
other
comments
is
that
mainnet
rep
can
flow
to
xdi,
but
not
the
other
way.
J
K
Quick
question
about
the
the
rep
flow
you're
saying
that
that
rep
should
go
one
way
from
mainnet
to
x
die,
but
for
the
workers
that
want
to
live
on
xdi
for
work
proposals
and
and
everything
that
get
rep
issued
from
past
proposals.
Would
that
be
ineligible
for
mainnet
rep
like
if
I
were
to
keep
track
of
my
past
proposals
and
make
a
request.
One
point
on
maintenance:
would
that
be
a
consideration.
J
So
all
of
the
rep
that
you're
earning,
even
if
you're
doing
your
worker
proposal
through
x,
die
at
least
for
the
next
six
months
and
probably
till
governance
2.0
system
is
included.
It's
very
important
that
you
also
earn
main
net
rep
with
your
proposal
and
the
only
way
that
we
can
do
that
really
is
doing
multiple
rep
awards
every
quarter,
so
the
exile
rewards
you
can
claim,
but
it's
really
important
that
we
match
up
those
awards
to
actual
like
main
net
rep
awards
that
we
do
in
a
multiple
award
batch.
B
Yes,
so
as
as
chris
did
in
his
proposal
on
x
die,
he
got
payment,
but
he
also
recorded
the
amount
of
mainnet
rep
that
he
is
owed
from
that
worker
proposal
and
he
put
that
in
the
proposal
now.
He
doesn't
yet
have
the
rep
on
mainnet.
But
that's
what
will
be
topped
up
in
the
quarterly
top-ups
for
all
rep
earners,
because
it's
recorded
in
their
proposal
on
xdi.
J
And
this
is
going
to
create
some
overhead
like
we're
literally
just
gonna
have
to
go
through
and
like
make
sure
this
is
accurate.
Every
quarter
we're
going
to
go
through
every
worker
proposal
make
sure
everyone's
accounted
for
but
like
I
think
we
have
to
do
it
and
we're
just
creating
a
system
to
be
able
to
count
that
up
more
easily.
The
one
question
that
I
think
is
still
outstanding
is
the
ways
to
calculate
the
rep
award
right.
J
So
in
the
current
worker
compensation
guidelines,
it's
0.166
of
total
rep,
it's
hard
to
find
the
total
amount
of
rep
and
it's
hard
to
multiply
it
by
that
random
number.
So
there
is
another
there's
an
alternative
way.
We
could
do
this,
which
is
every
month.
J
There
would
be
like
the
point,
one,
six,
six,
seven
percent
of
rep.
That
would
be
the
same
number
for
everybody
that
month
and
then
everyone
would
just
add
that
number
they
would
know
what
that
number
is,
and
they
would
add
it
in
their
proposals
and
then
even
we'll,
be
going
back
to
accounting
we'd
be
able
to
figure
out
that
out.
J
So
I
don't
know
if
people
have
thoughts
on
which,
which
one
should
we
just
calculate
the
current
rep,
make
that
easier
to
do,
or
should
we
just
have
a
single
number
for
every
month
for
all
contributors.
E
Yeah,
I
I
did
some
thinking
into
this
and
I
think
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
have
like
a
single
absolute
number,
mainly
because
you
know
if
it's
not
the
same,
if
you,
if
you
do
it
so
the
thing
is
the
percentage
changes
on
every
payout.
Somebody
is
doing,
the
absolute
number
is
changing
and
it's
not
the
same.
If
you
do
a
payout
three
times
a
month,
you
get
your
normal
monthly
pad,
you
do
it
every
month
and
then
you
do
it
once
at
the
end
of
the
three
months.
It's
not
the
same.
E
If
you
express
it
in
in
percentage,
you
you,
you
will
not
get
the
same
absolute
amount
and
if
you
do
like
it
there's
an
idea.
John
did
bring
up
as
they.
If
you
do,
if
you
say
we
fixed
on
the
first
of
the
month,
we
look
at
the
numbers
how
many
rep
they
are
and
then
we
get
like
the.
E
E
A
E
Yeah,
I
think
it's
much
easier
and
of
course
you
have
some
unsharpness,
but
in
a
way
it's
also
more
fair,
because
if
you
see
that
people
are
working
monthly,
but
now
it
depends
on
which
point
you
submit
your
proposal
and
then
you
get
more
or
less
rep
and
in
a
way
it
would
be
more
fair.
If
you
say
it's
always
the
first
of
the
month
with
absolute
rap
time.
For
this.
B
Yeah,
I
see,
I
see
a
future
where,
in
our
docs
our
new
documentation
area,
you
have
a
table
and
you
literally
have
the
start
of
each
month.
So
you
have
each
month
you
have,
you
have,
let's
say
the
start
of
each
month.
You
just
have
a
table
that
says
how
much
total
rep
there
is.
Then
it
shows
a
number
for
how
much
a
work,
a
full-time
worker
0.166
times
the
full
amount
and
so
like
you
could
go
back
and
look
if
I
worked
in
february
2021
for
the
whole
month.
B
This
is
exactly
how
much
rep
I
earned
in
that
month
and
you
could
have
that
table
and
it'd
be
very
transparent.
Everyone
could
go
and
look
at
that
table
for
each
month
and
that
would
just
extend
as
we
go
through
time.
F
I
think,
looking
forward
to
governance
2.02,
the
absolute
number
will
make
more
sense
because,
like
one
of
the
things
in
governance,
2.0
is
it.
It's
like.
Rep
is
almost
like
an
independent
kind
of
like
tracker
of
contributions
made
to
dx
now
and
then
voting
power
is
like
derived
from
that
right,
and
so
they
can
have
the
limits,
and
you
know.
J
F
To
get
into
account
with
calculating
voting
power,
but
but
you
kind
of
want
this
independent
tracker
of
contributions-
and
I
I
think
this
doing
this
in
governance,
2.0
is
going
to
open
up
a
lot
of
cool
possibilities
of
what
could
be
done
with
rap
even
outside
of
the
excel
like
it's
almost
like.
You
know
it's
real
reputation,
unchained
and
that's
pretty
cool,
but
then
I
mean,
if
you
do
that,
and
it's
like
you
know,
somebody
could
have
earned
rep
years
ago
and
that's
still
there
as
a
number.
F
The
percentage
is,
is
less
meaningful
in
the
future
than
than
just
like
the
the
actual
number
that
you
have.
J
Yeah,
because
I
think
that
the
important
things
now
or
things
I
like
about
it
are
like
that.
It's
like
the
same
number.
It's
like
standard
kind
of
throughout
right.
Everyone
has
it's
very
simple
and
then
two
the
reason
the
percentage
works
or
has
worked
is
because
it
is
a
like
automatic
inflation
like
kind
of
component.
It
kind
of
like
adds
to
that,
but
to
john's
point,
that's
less
important
in
governance.
J
2.0
because,
like
inflation
is
not
like
a
core
like
the
core
way
of
of
growing,
because
you
like,
we
want
to
earn,
be
able
to
earn
rep
in
other
ways.
So
yeah
I
mean,
I
think
it
makes
sense.
I
mean,
I
think,
is
if
most
people
kind
of
agree
that
we
just
will
have
some
way
of
publishing
it
like
every
month.
J
Right
we'll
have
some
standard
way
of
doing
it
like
getting
a
snapshot,
and
then
it
would
be
like
any
proposal
for
that
month
and
yeah,
and
I
guess
it
could
matter
a
little
bit
if
people
are
like
doing
proposals
at
the
end
of
months
or
like
the
beginning
of
months.
J
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
roles
around
that
or
if
it's
just
any
proposal
within
that
month,
but
it
would
also
be
good
if
everyone
kind
of
gets
on
a
more
consistent
basis
like
working
basis
or
everyone's
like
starting
at
the
beginning
month.
That's
a
whole
other
thing.
I
I
don't.
B
Think
the
1.166
percent
times
the
total
rep
over
beginning
of
month
versus
end
of
month
like
matters
that
it's
like
slight
differences,
right
cool
anyway,
the
the
last
topic
that
that
we
talked
about
a
lot.
The
last
couple
weeks
that
we
haven't
touched
on.
Yet,
I
think,
is
the
dxd
buyback.
B
L
Yeah,
I'm
happy
too,
so
the
basic
status
of
the
buyback
is
we've
discussed
the
parameters
for
the
buyback,
which
is
that
considering
the
current
price
of
dxd
contributors
as
well
as
the
community
members
have
agreed
that
it
is
time
to
reward
dxd
holders
by
buying
back
about
1
million
die
worth
of
dxd.
L
The
manner
in
which
we
will
be
doing
it
is
to
do
it
through
a
relayer
all
on
chain
and
be
as
automated
as
possible.
Also
something
that's
been
discussed
that
we're
finalizing
is
the
price
of
dxd.
L
If,
for
whatever
reason,
market
conditions
go
up
or
down
if,
for
whatever
reason,
the
price
of
dxd
does
meet
book
value
or
even
meet
up
a
certain
percentage
of
book
value
which
we
have
not
yet
determined,
we
would
stop
the
buy
back
program
because
there
would
be
no
need
because
the
price
wouldn't
be
justified
for
us
to
repurchase
at
that
time.
L
Yeah
and
so
there'll
be
some
documentation
circulating
about
the
specifics
that
I
just
mentioned,
but
that's
that's
the
long
and
short
of
it
and
we'll.
Hopefully,
once
we
get
the
on
chain,
technicalities
worked
out
start
the
program
shortly
in
the
coming
weeks.
F
And
just
to
add
on
it's
relevant
to
that,
and
also
the
swapper
liquidity
that
chris
mentioned
earlier,
I'm
documenting
kind
of
all
the
steps
that
are
going
to
be
involved
in
kind
of
you
know
not
just
actually
doing
the
proposals,
but
also
the
deployments
that
need
to
be
made
in
the
testing
etc.
So
I'll
be
sharing.
Hopefully
something
tomorrow
at
the
product
strategy
called
to
help
give
clarity
to
everyone
and
what
the
process
for
these
things,
the
xd
pi
back,
the
swapper
liquidity
will
will
look
like.
B
K
It
now
give
a
quick,
a
quick
recap
of
the
kind
of
communications
and
community
if
you'd
like,
I
know
we're
over,
so
I
can
keep
it
brief.
Yeah.
B
K
Go
ahead
thanks,
cube
yeah,
so
I
made
a
post
in
in
marketing
if
you
haven't
seen
it
yet
about
our
stats
for
february
discord.
Incentive
program
has
been
doing
very
well:
we've
seen
a
lot
more
community,
chatter
and
and
discussion
than
we
have
previously,
at
least
in
my
time,
so
very
happy
with
that.
I
believe
we
are
just
over
600
members
now
in
a
month
where
are
we
here?
K
Twitter's
are
doing
well,
they're
january's
a
little
slower,
so
we're
doing
very
well
compared
to
january
and
we're
on
par
with
our
our
regular
impressions.
Otherwise,
in
discord,
I've
implemented
a
price
bot
in
the
top
right.
We
have
emojis
now
in
the
discord,
as
well
as
a
telegram
channel
that
has
cross
compatibility
with
telegram
so
chatting
in
the
discord.
You
can
chat
directly
with
telegram,
if
you
don't
use
it
and
vice
versa
and
yeah
just
there's
a
quick
update
there.
B
Cool
and
one
interesting
thing
that
I
think
the
team's
been
doing
related
to
twitter
and
omen
is
actually
highlighting
a
handful
of
the
like
cool
community,
a
bunch
of
omen
markets
that
are
related
to
different
communities
in
the
d5
and
ethereum
space
and
trying
to
engage
their
twitter
communities
into
like
and
pull
them
into
the
into
omen,
and
hopefully
try
out
and
bet
on
some
of
those
markets.
B
And
hopefully
you
know,
we've
had
also
some
interest
about
people
creating
some
of
their
own
markets
related
to
their
own
communities
too.
So
I,
I
think,
the
one
thing
that
we
run
into
there
is
the
people
create
some
markets,
but
then
there's
not
the
liquidity,
and
maybe
they
don't
want
to
put
in
the
liquidity
and
so
market
without
liquidity
is
not
that
useful,
but
it's
a
step
in
the
right
direction
and
that
eventually,
hopefully,
we'll
have
some
more
kind
of
professional
liquidity
providers
taking
advantage
of
those
markets,
but
absolutely
cool.