►
From YouTube: DXdao Weekly Meeting #32 (Recap) [2021-02-18]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
the
weekly
dx
dow
call-
and
we
alternate
with
resource
management
and
community
recap,
and
this
week
is
a
recap
of
the
recent
happenings,
so
we
usually
start
out
with
omen
on
the
product
stuff,
but
just
because
somebody
needs
to
drop
off.
Let's
start
off
talking
about
the
design
proposal
that
was
made
by
the
firm
enter
casa
I
think,
set
and
maybe
keenan
you
guys
could
kind
of
give
a
summary
of
that
and
what's
going
on,
there.
C
Sure
so
I
linked
the
dow
talk
post
to
in
the
chat
here
and
so
yeah
me
and
kenan
has
been
talking
to
to
enter
casa
and
they
came
to
the
monday
meeting
also
and
and
the
owner
introduced
himself.
C
They
have
a
pretty
pretty
great
background
working
with
a
lot
of
crypto
companies
for
for
a
really
long
time.
They
worked
with
one
of
our
partners,
api
three.
They
also
creating
the
interface
for
their
dow.
So
they
know
a
little
bit
about
our
world
at
least,
and
they
know
a
lot
about
crypto.
C
Their
network
is
pretty
big
when
it
comes
to
actually
being
able
to
deliver
graphics.
Like
short
video
clips
of
explainers
and
stuff,
like
that,
so
the
yeah.
So
I
asked
them
to
to
post
this
proposal
and
it
goes
through
one
of
the
first
steps
for
us
getting
external
help
and
that's
actually
creating
our
landing
page
and
and
developing
our
branding
from
what
we
have
today.
D
Page
yeah,
I
think
I
think
we
were
going
to
50
50
this.
I
think
that
really
just
hit
every
nail
on
the
head
here.
D
One
extra
comment
I
could
give,
I
guess,
is:
I
noticed
a
comment
from
paul
mcna
regarding
landing
pages
for
all
of
our
products,
where
this
proposal
kind
of
just
mentions
our
main
home
page,
and
the
idea
of
the
partnership
would
be
to
start
with
it
and
to
move
from
there
to
our
other
products
and
have
them
as
a
long-term
kind
of
partner
for
for
any
of
those
needs
and
keep
our
style
kind
of
consistent.
C
Yeah,
so
we
we
talked
actually
a
lot
with
these
guys
and
I
told
them
like.
I
want
a
long-term
partnership
with
this
firm.
Instead
of
just
doing
this
one-off
job,
we
want
some
kind
of
red
thread
in
between
our
products,
landing
pages.
I
mean
it's
really
hard
to
for
them
to
do
that.
Maybe
ohman
doesn't
want
to
look
like
dick
star
or
swapper
right,
so
we
can't
we.
C
The
plan
the
plan
is
that
this
firm
will
be
the
marketing
producer
of
of
material,
so
anything
like
if
they
create
our
branding,
we'll
we'll
also
ask
for
them
to
create
the
templates.
For
let's
say
when
we
have
updates
and
stuff
like
that.
C
So
I
always
have
the
that
and
thought
that
we
we
need
material
and
all
our
designers
are
working
with
products
having
them
create
the
templates
and
the
style
will
make
our
job
much
easier,
and
that
comes
back
to
if
they,
if
they
succeed
with
this
proposal
and
and
delivers
a
product
landing
page
and
branding,
they
will
most
probably
continuing
on
to
our
products,
swapper
and
omen
and
visa.
C
A
discussion
I
mean
we
don't
really
know
right
when
they
start
working,
they
will
not
just
shut,
shut
off,
shut
us
off
and
the
work
they
will
probably
need
some
kind
of
short
meetings
back
and
forth
just
to
get
started
me
and
geronimo
will
probably
will
be
talking
to
them
two
three
times
before
they
they'll
commit
to
to
the
sketches
or
whatever
they're
gonna
do,
but
in
those
meetings
we'll
probably
discuss
like
hey.
This
is
what
we
came
up
with.
Do
you
guys
want
to
connect
this
product
in
this
way
and
yeah?
C
A
Yeah,
like
I
think
it
doesn't
hurt
to
actually
get
a
proper
landing
page
for
the
d
style
first,
I
agree
with
paul
that
each
product
will
have
its
own
landing
page
for
the
specific
product
itself,
but
this
is
like,
I
think,
once
we
actually
have
these
down
landing
page
designed
and
specced
out
like
I,
I
don't,
I'm
not
sure
if
we're
at
the
stage
where
we're
already
thinking
about
about
like
a
coin
based
type
branding
decision,
I
think
our
products
are
very
young
and
they
they're
like
they're
maturing,
but
we're
not
at
the
point
where
we're
like
okay,
this
is
it.
A
This
is
the
product
and
then
we're
like
okay.
Now
we
need
to
just
brand,
like
re
brand
it
into
like
the
dx
down
language,
I'm
not
even
sure
if
that
is
like
the
best
path
forward
for
like
a
for
the
d
star
itself
like
if
there's
a
team
who
wants
to
have
their
own
like
language,
why
shouldn't
they
just
do
their
own
yeah.
E
Do
you
mean
like
eunice,
like
you
go
to
uniswap.com
or
whatever
dot
io
like
you
just
get
to
like
some
page,
and
then
you
have
to
like
click
to
get
to
the
app
that
you
actually
want
to
use
right
and
balancer,
and
a
few
other
products
have
that
even
tornado
cache
or
whatever,
like
the
landing
page,
because
we
have
dx
dow.
I
feel
like
that.
A
Yeah,
I
think
the
dig
style
is
right
now
already
complex
enough
to
have
like
a
deserved
landing
page
itself,
like
these
styles,
interconnected
with
all
the
products.
This
is
like
awesome.
This
is
like
a
cyberpunk,
and
this
is
something
we
should
like
present
like
geekstar
is
probably
the
one
of
the
only
organizations
where
it's
like
a
glass
house.
You
can
look
into
the
blockchain
and
see
what
it
is
and
the
whole
activity
like
life.
A
So
I
think
the
diesel
deserves
like
a
proper
place
about
what
it
is,
and
I
think
the
products
they're
getting
so
complex
that
yeah,
we
can
add
them
as
like.
We
currently
have
as
like.
Oh
okay,
this
is
something
the
geek
style
is
doing,
but
once
you
click
on
it,
you're
actually
going
to
the
product
gate
gateway,
landing
page
where
it's
even
like
it's
even
more
complex.
So
my
point
is
I:
I
don't
think
there
is
room
for
the
products
on
the
desktop
landing
page
like
there's
room
in
like
okay.
A
Yeah
like
I
see
it
as
ethereum
ethereum.
The
rock
is
like
a
community
driven
thing
where
everyone
is
just
adding
stuff
to
it,
and
everyone
loves
the
page
and
wants
to
maintain
it,
and
this
is
this
should
be
similar
to
how
we
work
with
the
excel
page
like
there
should
be
all
the
infos
needed
to
get
into
like
the
child's.
A
Yeah,
like
even
more
yeah
like
then,
you
think
like
multiple
chains,
even
right,
like
the
d
star,
will
live
on
multiple
trains.
That
is
already
complex
enough.
C
I
agree
with
you:
we
should
like
the
style
should
be
not
like
shouldn't
be
like
a
some
kind
of
brand,
and
then
we
have
the
products
right.
It
should
be
its
own
thing,
it's
it's,
the
it's
the
biggest
product,
if
we
say
so,
and
then
we
we
could
link
to
each
product
and
each
product
can
have
have
their
landing
page.
C
I
mean
if,
if
I
wouldn't
say
it's
an
issue
like,
if
you
go
to
omen.eth,
we
could
we
could
link
directly
to
the
product
and
then
start
the
the
landing
page
could
be
something
else.
If,
if
that's
like
a
pr
problem,
if
you
check
uniswap,
unisop
has
um.org
for
the
website
and
then
swap.exchange
or
what
is
it.
C
So
they
yeah,
I
think,
if,
if
you
want
to
link
and
be
informed
about
unit
swap,
you
can
still
go
to
the
landing
page
and
I
think
especially
for
us,
we're
doing
quite
complex
stuff
like
for
swapper,
like
what's
the
difference
between
swapper
and
uniswap,
and
if
you
wanna
like
send
medium
posts
every
time
or
something
like
that,
I
don't
think
that's
the
way.
It's
better
to
just
send
a
landing
page
where
we
explain
it
with
graphics
and
and
text,
and
then
they
can
do
whatever
they
want.
B
Yeah
very
cool,
very
cool
effort,
a
nice
proposal.
I
think
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
that
it's
coming
from
kind
of
an
outside
firm
as
well.
I
mean
one
because
I
think
the
outside
perspective
is
is
helpful
for
this
sometimes,
and
also
because
the
designer
is
working
at
txtower
are
plenty
busy
already.
So
it's
good
to
have
the
edition.
I
would.
C
Say
also,
I
I'm
not
an
expert
on
websites
jeronimo.
I
don't
know
how
about
you,
but
so
it's
like.
We
have
the
money
in
the
bank.
We
either
get
someone
recruited
and
that
will
take
time
and
effort
from
our
side,
and
I
would
say
this
is
a
good
first
step
and
we
could
always
do
a
new
landing
page
and
new
websites.
But
this
is
a
low
hanging
fruit.
We
can
do
it
now
and
yeah.
We
should
do
it.
A
I
agree
everyone
is
extremely
busy.
No
one
can
focus
on
on
a
completely
new
project
like
I
would
be
interested,
but
I
I
can't
do
it
primarily
because
I
think
only
we
ourselves
can
actually
do
the
best
job
to
represent
ourselves,
not
not
saying
that,
like
the
team
is
not
capable
or
something
but
like,
we
need
them,
and
we
need
them
now,
because
our
landing
page
is
needs
to
be
replaced
as
soon
as
possible,
with
like
a
decent
page,
which
represents
us
in
a
in
a
good
way.
B
Definitely
yep,
okay,
great
thanks
and
I
guess
now
we
can
move
into
the
product
recaps
toronto.
Do
you
want
to
talk
about
oman.
A
Yeah
we
released
oman
version,
1.
2.3,
primarily
fixing
the
mobile
non-web3
browser
issue,
so
people
can
actually
share
links
and
they're
they're,
reachable
even
worse
case
scenario.
We
added
compounds
to
the
mainnet
products.
A
B
You
want
to
explain
a
little
bit
what
that
means
by
adding,
because
it
doesn't
mean
that
you're
actually
doing
borrowing
or
lending
on
through
oman
interface
right
right.
A
Right
like
to
to
make
it
simple:
people,
like
users,
can
actually
create
markets
with
compound
tokens,
and
this
is
done
completely
seamless,
so
the
user
is
actually
picking
dye
and
then
can
just
enable
the
feature
to
use
the
compound
token
to
actually
fund
a
market
with
interest
bearing
tokens.
So
as
soon
as
soon
as
the
market
is
created,
the
market,
like
the
liquidity
itself
inside
the
market,
is
generating
interest
and
people
who
hold
the
outcome.
Tokens
are
also
like
receiving
those
interests
by
just
holding
the
outcome,
totals.
B
Right
so
this
so
basically
omen
will
take
and
wrap
your
tokens
or
like
send
deposit
them
in
compound,
rather
for
you
right
automatically,
so
that
your
collateral
in
a
prediction
market
is
actually
earning
interest,
while
it's
sitting
there.
So
this
sort
of
addresses,
like
I
think
what
people
refer
to
as
the
capital
lock-up
problem
for
prediction
markets,
really,
especially
if
you
have
a
longer
duration
market,
say
like
a
year,
it's
kind
of
a
shame
to
have
your
stable
coins
or
whatever
collateral
sitting
in
the
market,
not
generating
interest
right.
A
Yeah
100,
the
main
reason
why
I
say
it's
like
a
test
case
for
mainnet
is
because
on
mainnet,
like
everything,
is
expensive,
even
without
the
compound
integration,
but
the
compound
integration
makes
it
even
like
crazy,
expensive
and
that's
why
I
think,
having
like
a
partnership
or
like
integration
on
x-die
with
a
native
borrowing
and
lending
protocol,
is
something
very
interesting
and
something
we
should
explore,
and
I
think
we
are
already
in
contact
with
a
team
which
is
behind
honey,
swap
they're,
actually
doing
a
lot
of
forks
for
extern,
and
one
of
them
is
like
celeste,
which
is
a
arrogant,
chord
work,
and
this
is
something
like
there
are
a
lot
of
similarity
like.
A
There
are
a
lot
of.
We
have
the
same
goals,
and
this
is
something
we
we
are
currently
exploring
where
we
like,
where
exactly
we
can
partner
with
and
omin,
is
like
a
very
generic
product
and
like
even
right
now,
I
can
already
say
they.
With
with
the
aragon
court,
like
with
celeste,
we
can
add
a
new
curation
source,
so
they
could
curate
markets
too.
A
We
can
use
celeste
as
like
a
claros
alternative
for
arbitration
and
with
with
their
like
borrowing
and
landing
protocol.
On
the
next
day,
we
could
even
like
integrate
them
into
our
exit
product.
B
Yeah
and
then
integrating
that
with
omen
on
next
night
can
make
a
lot
of
sense.
It's
basically
for
the
same
reasons
we
just
discussed.
So
that's
really
cool.
I
think
they're,
a
great
community
too.
I
encourage
people
to
check
out
their
discord
and
make
connections
with
them.
Lots
of
opportunities
for
collaboration.
A
Right
to
to
finalize
like
what
what's
what's
in
the
new
release-
and
the
last
point
is
that
we
included
the
geek
style
on
xdi
as
an
arbitrator
option
for
the
xtype
product
and
that's
it
from
the
new
version.
One
like
interesting
thing
I
want
to
mention
is
that
we're
already
like
focusing
on
doing
this
tight
integration
with
xdi,
which
means
user,
doesn't
need
to
care
about
network
switching.
They
just
go
to
omen.ethe.
A
A
In
the
background
they
actually
like
using
x
die-
and
this
is
done
like
via
diagnosis,
safe
proxy
kit,
which
will
live
on
x,
die.
A
I
don't
yeah
like
that's
a
that's
a
something
which
is
like
the
holy
grail,
I
think,
and
something
we
can
deliver
really
soon,
and
this
yeah,
like
I'm,
really
excited
about
that
and
hacksaw
actually
already,
I
think,
created
a
market
with
with
this
just
signing
via
this
extra
tight
integration,
so
we're
like.
Actually
we
are
pretty
far
with
that
yeah.
I'm
really
curious
how
this
will
look
like.
B
Say
tight
integration,
the
definition
of
tight
integration
would
be.
You
basically
interact
with
the
dap.
In
the
same
way,
you
would
interact
with
the
main
net
depth,
but
it's
actually
using
the
x9
chain
underneath
right
right.
A
Like
the
way
yeah
the
way
people
need
to
imagine
that,
when
someone
deposits
something
into
omen,
they
are
basically
using
x,
die
and
then
they
just
like
sign
message
signed
transactions.
They
don't
even
need
to
pay
something
for
their
transactions.
So
that's
like.
H
A
And
like
I
think
yes
seeing
right
now,
this
this
alpha
version
with
extra
having
this
x
die
sub
domain.
A
I
think,
though,
our
markets
are
not
really
accessible
for
everyone,
and
I
I
think
this
xdi
tight
integration
will
make
sure
that,
like
literally,
everyone
just
goes
to
omen
and
sees
exile
markets
so
like
I
think
that
will,
I
think,
unlock
the
whole
product
and
I'm
I'm
really
excited
about
that
and
yeah
there's
there's
some
ui
related
changes.
We're
already
like
planning
to
get
done
to
make
sure
that,
like
this
x,
tight
integration
is
like
bulletproof,
user,
friendly
and
yeah.
I'm
excited.
B
A
G
A
Will
basically
get
rid
of
the
sub
domain
already
yeah,
primarily
because
the
main
website
omer.eth
will
be
able
to
show
main
net
markets
and
external
markets,
so
the
user
can
actually
just
switch
like
the
blockchains
on
the
front
end
if
they
want
to
like
on
default.
I
think
we
should
even
go
and
say
like
on
default.
A
It's
just
extine,
but
if
they
really
want
to
and
there's
like
a
huge,
exciting
market
like
a
presidential
election
with
like
millions
of
liquidity
on
mainnet,
they
can
just
like
okay,
let's
switch
on
to
mainnet,
and
then
they
just
use
omen
as
right.
Now
on
maintenance
like
there's
no
changes
at
all.
A
It's
basically
like
an
early
version
for
like
to
to
just
install
omen
on
xdi
and
like
especially
test
out
the
the
claros
mainnet
bridge,
but
like
with
the
extra
tight
integration.
I
think
there
is
no
better
way
of
doing
it
to
scale
a
product
on
on
ethereum
right
now
and
I
think
yeah.
I
am
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
that.
B
E
E
So
that's
that's
one
drawback
with
like
you
using
an
on
main
net
gnosis,
safe
proxy
kit
or
whatever
to
like
get
started
to
like
set
up
the
tight
integration
right.
A
Yeah,
so
sky,
that's
actually
an
interesting
point
like
I
think.
If
users
actually
would
connect
to
xday
and
they
go
to
omen.ed,
I
think
they
could
still
use
the
gnosis
safe,
like
signing
feature
so
hardcore.
My
point
is
hardcore
extra
users
who
are
like
doing
stuff
on
xdi
all
the
time
they
could
still
leverage
this
tight
integration
by
just
signing
messages
and
interacting
with
performance.
A
The
main
like
the
biggest
issue-
and
I
think
everyone
like
every
project
who's
trying
to
stay
on
ethereum
and
like
scale
on
some
other
network,
will
always
be
the
bridge
like
the
bridge
is
costly
and
yeah
the
higher
the
gas
fees.
The
higher
people
pay
like
transactional,
bridging,
like
that,
it's
just
very
costly
to
bridge
to
exercise
like
the
another
issue
is
that
you
need
to
claim
your
dye,
which
came
from
extinct
to
mainnet,
so
on
mainnet.
A
You
need
to
claim
your
die
back
and
that
alone
costs
around
30
dollars
and,
like
sky,
you
made
a
great
point.
That's
that's
an
issue.
No
one
wants
to
pay
30
bucks
to
get
their
money
back
right
like
first
like
out
and
that's
an
issue
and
in
two
they
probably
pay-
maybe
half
best
case
so
fifty
dollars
right
now
to
get
money
into
omen
on
like
on
scalable
next
time.
A
Is
still
possible
like
we,
we
could
show
on
mainnet
ormond
like
omen.eth
once
they
try
to
deposit.
We
actually
like
could
integrate
an
on-ramp
service
where
the
stuff
is
not
coming
from
mainnet,
but
they
just
purchase
x-die
via
like
service,
and
then
they
don't
need
to
pay
that
so
funny
enough
with
credit
card,
it's
cheaper
to
get
into
oman.
Maybe.
F
Yeah,
just
the
on
and
off
warning.
Of
course,
my
mini
thought
was
thinking
about
xdi
for
worker
proposals,
because
that's
like
a
cost
that
is
going
to
be
the
same
thing
there.
I
did
notice
that
I,
I
guess
to
get
onto
x
die
is
that
cheaper
than
getting
off
or
because
I
I
like
I
put
some
money
on
next
time
a
couple
days
ago
and
I
think
my
with
107
way
gas
prices
paid
four
dollars
and
50
cents
to
get
onto
x,
dot,
which
seems
like.
B
E
F
A
No,
that
was
mainly
it
like
signaling
the
exit
chain,
please
bridge
stuff,
to
mainnet
back,
that's
like
nothing,
but
then
you
go
to
mainnet
and
then,
like
hey,
you
need
to
claim
your
die.
I
think
back
in
the
days.
They
actually
did
it
for
the
like
everyone,
but
now
it's
like
okay,
it's
no
one
can
pay
for
that.
So
everyone
like
people
need
to
claim
their
their
money
and
sadly
I
think
it's
it's
it's
not
as
cheap
as
moving
stuff
into
the
extra
like,
like
your
four
dollar
transaction.
B
Yeah
I
mean
just
looking
at
ether
scan
which
I'm
noticing
now
that
gives
some
example.
Transactions
for
the
gas
cost,
like
your
average
erc
20
transfer
on
mainnet,
is
22
right
now,
so,
even
if
the
bridge
is
you
know
on
that
order
of
magnitude
like
a
transfer,
it's
you're
still
looking
at
twenty
thirty
dollars
and
that's
not
how
you
can
go
up
so
yeah,
something
to
definitely
something
that
will
matter
and
to
think
about
so
yeah,
very
cool
stuff.
B
Let's
move
on
to
mesa
and
talk
about
what's
going
on
there,
I
want
martin,
if
you're
around
here.
I
Yeah,
that's
me
so
sure
damn
and
I
have
some
notes
so
today
we
had
builded
it
like
he's
designing
and
he
did
like
show
stuff
in
one
of
the
channels
and
he
got
feedback
from
set
and
german,
too.
I
think
it
was
quite
useful
to
have
other
eyes
looking
at
this
kind
of
stage.
We
are
right
now,
and
this
is
from
the
design
perspective,
so
I'm
confident
that
bertie
finished
his
work
until
the
end
of
february.
I
I
guess
and
then
yeah
we
started
to
go
in
the
direction
of
scrum
and
for
us
as
a
team.
I
think
it's
a
good
way
to
work
together
because
yeah
we
are
a
fresh
team
and
we
we
need
to
get
things
running
and
to
know
each
other
and
banky
is
helping
us.
I
So
now
we
really
today
we
are
really
be
able
to
have
the
daily
like
in
50
minutes,
who
is
like
the
the
goal
to
have
only
50
minutes
for
the
daily
sync
for
the
team
and
the
team
itself
is
still
nico
and
rui
working
on
the
smart
contract
site
and
they
there's
like
streamlining
the
code
right
now
with
here.
The
fog
from
from
gnosis-
and
they
also
think
in
direction
how
to
modalize
the
smart
contracts
to
be
to
be
more
like
an
open
platform
and
not
only
all
one
sale
agreement.
I
I
We
also
have
adam
now
is
working
on
the
subgraph
together
with
nico,
because
we
need
like
the
subgraph
for
the
communication
of
the
what's
going
on
in
the
and
if
a
sale
is
happening,
then
we
have
like
yeah
lee
who
is
joined.
Us
he's
work
on
the
front
end
still,
and
we
also
will
have
our
first
month.
On
monday,
we
have
our
first
like
scrum
review
and
we
have
like
one
hour
as
a
review
from
this
process.
We
are
now
starting.
I
We
will
have
like
weekly
sprints
at
the
start,
because
yeah
it's
easier
to
have
the
cycles
relatively
short
to
to
get
used
to
it
in
a
way,
and
then
we
have.
We
have
one
hour
for
the
sprint
review
and
then
we
have
one
hour
for
the
sprint
goal
and
venky
joined
us
and
he's
really
helping
us
to
get
the
process
running,
and
everyone
is
getting
adjusted
to
work
like
this,
and
I
really
think
we
have
like
good
in
this
week
yeah.
I
I
think
the
team
communication
has
really
been.
I
B
Yeah,
it's
awesome
very
exciting.
It's
cool
like
mesa,
essentially
the
newest
product
team
for
dx
style,
but
it
seems,
like
the
your
process,
has
matured
quite
quickly
and
it's
cool
to
see
things
like
that,
like
this
daily
meetings
of
the
scrum
and
different
interesting
to
see
the
different
teams
kind
of
adapting
their
own
processes
in
different
ways.
One
of
the
things
that
I
want
to
try
to
focus
on
myself
is
to
help
kind
of
bridge
the
team's
processes
and
come
up
with
some
kind
of
like
a
standard.
You
know
minimal
standard.
B
I
guess
like
processes
for
for
dx
now
and
different.
I
Yeah
venky
also,
I
think,
he's
in
touch
with
seth
from
swapper
team
and
I
think
he's
maybe
because
he
has
an
overview
of
the
different
teams
how
they
work.
He
can
also
yeah
help
us
to
unify
our
unify
our
processes,
because
I
greatly
think
that
it
helps
for
the
team.
If
they
have
like
the
same
working
style,
then
people
can
also
switch
from
one
team
to
another.
If
there's
a
big
load
or
important
stuff
to
do.
B
I
I
We
also
think
yeah.
We
struggle
also
a
little
bit
with
github
at
the
moment.
I
guess
because
github
it's
not
really
made
for
agile
development.
You
know
you
can
have
your
boards,
your
your
your
or
the
kanban
boards,
but
the
way
a
lot
of
things
is
missing,
but
we
will
stay
with
it
up
for
the
next
few
springs
for
sure,
but
we
are
not
sure
if
it's
really
a
good
thing
to
do
and
venki's
is
doing
some
research
to
to
find
out.
I
I
I
B
Easy
keeps
things
consolidated
yeah.
Thank
you
for
that
that
update.
Should
we
move
to
swapper.
Is
that
I
don't
know.
I
know
you
had
to
drop,
so
I
don't
know
if
you're
also
a
red
dot
right
now,
so
I'm
not
sure
you
can,
because
okay
he's
out
of
reception,
maybe
we'll
I
can
get.
I
can
try
to
do
a
little
bit
of
an
update
for
a
swapper
and
if
anybody
else
wants
to
jump
in
feel
free,
I
think
the
development
on
the
farming
side
is
moving
along
along.
Quite
quite
nicely.
B
You
know,
federico
is
now
working
on
the
ui
after
having
done
the
smart
contracts
there
same
with
the
governance
contracts
like
the
erc20
guild
contracts
have
been
audited,
they've
gone
through
a
round
of
revisions
by
gusto,
and
I
think
the
next
step
is
to
kind
of
test
those
and
maybe
give
them
one
final
review
before
going
live,
and
I
know
that
the
swapper
team,
I
think
tony
and
federico
have
been
working
on
on
the
ui
for
the
governance
and
for
swapper.
B
In
addition
to
that,
there's
a
couple
of
other
folks
that
are
taking
on
swapper
related
tasks.
One
is
james
working
on
the
aggregation
and
it
actually
seems
like
that's,
hit
the
ground
running
this
week.
We
had
a
couple
of
meetings
discussing
how
aggregation
would
look.
Oh
yeah
good
good
point,
federico
ex-tie
deployment
as
well.
So
on
the
aggregation
side,
you
know
it's
been
on
the
roadmap
for
swapper
and
the
idea
is
to
do
kind
of
a
light
aggregation.
Almost
I
almost
think
of
it.
B
I've
been
starting
to
call
it
switching
more
than
aggregation
like
the
ability
to
trade
through
uniswap
or
sushi,
swap
liquidity
in
the
swapper
ui
kind
of
the
high
level
goal
for
dx,
dow
being
here
to
attract
people
to
swapper
for
specific
reasons
around.
You
know
certain
para
liquidity
or
the
farming,
and
then
you
know
make
it
attractive
enough,
so
that
once
people
arrive
at
swapper,
they
they
stay
there
to
do
their
their
training.
B
The
other
kind
of
mode
that
I
think
set
likes
to
mention
is
a
lot
of
people
will
go
to
one
inch
to
just
see
where
the
best
price
is
and
then
go
to
that
particular
exchange,
whether
it's
unit
swap
or
balance
or
whatnot,
to
do
the
trade,
and
so
you
kind
of
think
of
the
this
approach
that
swapper
is
taking
now
kind
of
melds
those
two
together,
there's
no
additional
fees
to
using
sushi,
swap
or
uniswap
through
the
swapper
ui.
B
The
way
that
it's
being
implemented
here
so
yeah
we'll
have
more
about
that.
It's
kind
of
early
stage
development-
and
I
know
that
is
working
through
some
of
the
designs,
but
but
the
aggregation
stuff
is
also
underway
and
then
yeah.
The
last
thing
is,
as
federico
reminded
me,
that
swapper
is
actually
now
like.
The
contracts
are
on
x,
die.
The
dap
officially
is
not
actually
pointing
to
them
yet,
but
there
are
swapper
contracts
on
xdi
and
that's
being
tested
and
worked
on.
I
don't
know
federico.
J
Yeah
so
well
yeah,
but
about
the
dap.
It's
actually
already
kind
of
it's
already
working
on
the
next
die.
I
think
that
on
swapper
dot
dev
you
can
actually
go
and
and
play.
J
But
that's
pretty
much
everything
I
I
think.
B
Cool
yes,
a
lot
of
exciting
stuff
in
the
works
for
swapper
anything
else
or
any
questions
on
swapper.
B
If
not,
I
think
we
can
move
on
to
just
recapping
the
biz
dev
call,
which
I
missed
part
of
so
nylon.
If
you're
on
you
have
to
do
that.
H
Yes,
I
think
you
were
having
some
weather
issues,
I
think
yeah.
So,
in
the
visit
of
call,
we
mostly
two
main
things:
ahmed
from
economy
came
and
kind
of,
like
talked
about
some
of
the
things
they're
releasing
there's
a
group
on
telegram
with
economy,
people
and
some
of
the
external
people.
If
you
want
to
join
ping
me,
I
think
an
integration
always
already
started
for
by
economy
on
for
omen.
H
Correct
me
from
wrong
drama,
but
it
looks
like
it
hey.
That
was
one
thing.
Another
thing
is
the
presentation
from:
what's
it
called.
H
Enter
house,
I
guess
this
shouldn't
be
that
difficult
which
we
discussed
in
the
beginning
of
this
call.
I
think
this
is
something
great.
Then
we
had
we
had
a
marketing
discussion,
just
like
the
general
state
of
the
exile
in
relation
to
intracasa
and
yeah,
and
we
kind
of
went
to
discussion
on
nfts
that
skye,
missed
and
yeah.
Maybe
this
is
something
to
explore
as
well.
Nfcs
are
kind
of
exploding
in
general,
and
you
know
this
is
something
we
should
consider
it's
part
of
the
marketing
strategy.
I
guess
yeah.
B
F
Yeah
sure
just
kind
of
quick,
so
talk
about
community
rep
boost
for
the
month.
So
if
you
have
any
of
the
nominations,
get
them
in
discussion
on
the
gas
concerns
with
that,
but
we're
working
hopefully
on
ways
to
more
cheaply.
Do
that
a
lot
of
thoughts
on
treasury
diversification
and
how
the
treasury's
doing
as
it's
approaching
is
has
gone
up.
F
So
I
think
we've
had
about
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
of
stables
that
have
been
converted
and
that's
of
the
three
million
dollar
goal
from
the
treasury
authorization
proposal,
so
we're
on
about
a
little
under
like
500k
a
week
and
so
the
discussion
about
it,
that's
too
fast,
too
slow
and
then
kind
of
turning
over
to
what
are
the
next
for
the
next
treasury
authorization
proposal.
What
are
the
things
that
we
want
to
include
in
it
and
the
movies
you
want
to
take?
F
There
are
also
some
thoughts
on
the
transaction
cost
associated
with
converting
xdia
authorization
proposal
is
up,
so
this
would
be
potentially
move
all
worker
proposals
to
xdi.
I
think
that
should
alleviate
some
of
the
gas
concerns
and
that's
why?
But
the
conversation
before
about
the
bridge.
That's
a
new
cost,
so
we'll
have
to
monitor
how
that
affects
things
and
yeah.
Then
just
governance
2.0
that
I
wanted
to
go
over
for
a
bit,
but
any
other
things
with
the
governance
discussion
to.
B
Yeah-
and
I
would
just
mention
to
the
yeah-
we
had
a
couple
of
mishaps
with
the
test
relay
proposals,
but
those
are
being
worked
on
and
we're
trying
to
be
better
about
integration
testing
and
that
the
bonding
curve,
pausing,
I
think,
is
actually
enabled
through
the
ui.
But
one
thing
we're
trying
to
do
this
week
before
that
proposal
gets
made,
is
just
to
do
some
integration
testing.
You
know
kind
of
taking
that
lesson
from
the
relayers
just
to
be
a
little
extra
careful
there,
but
but
that
should
be
coming
soon.
F
Yeah
and
then
there's
kind
of
as
it's
formed,
there's
like
wrinkybee,
so
the
doubt
I
think
nylon
depo
deployed
copy,
the
dow
and
rinkaby,
which
will
be
used
for
a
lot
of
that
testing
and
then
xdi
kind
of
serves
as
a
more
live
battle
or
battle
tested
one,
and
so
I
think,
figuring
out
how
we
develop
a
process
through
those
exactly-
and
I
think
augusto
has
actually.
B
F
Yeah
and
I
I
am
going
to
probably
get
somewhat
specific
and
just
go
through
some
of
the
text
right
now,
just
because
this
is
important,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
all
on
the
same
page.
So
as
a
brief
background,
we've
been
talking
about
this
for
several
months,
but
we're
we've,
I
think,
got
a
solution
that
we're
inching
towards
here.
F
So
just
a
few
things
that
we
need
to
decide
so
on
the
broad
structure
of
the
voting
power
and
good
governance,
we're
kind
of
in
broad
agreement,
the
last
component
that
we're
we're
figuring
out
here
is
the
migration
process
to
a
new
system,
and
so
this
has
two
components:
there's
the
10,
000
dxd
allocation
and
then
a
rep
inflation
allocation,
so
basically
giving
rep
to
dxd
holders
and
giving
dxd
to
rep
holders
with
you
know,
of
course,
a
bunch
of
stipulations.
F
So
the
stipulations
I
want
to
go
through
specifically
on
the
10
000
dxd
allocation,
because
we
we've
gotten
a
little
specific
here
and
I
actually
even
had
some
updates
from
before,
and
so
I
want
to
make
sure
everyone.
This
you
know,
could
potentially
be
an
important
incentive
component
for
all
workers
and
anyone
who's
participated
in
governance.
F
So
it's
important
that
we,
like
account
for
everyone,
that
we're
trying
to
here
so
there's
two
components
to
this:
there's
base
distribution
and
proportional
distribution,
so
base
distribution
is
meant
to
be
a
catch-all
for
all
for
any
and
all
rep
holders.
So
this
would
mean
anyone
that
is
like
been
dormant.
Anyone
that
has
had
some
affiliate
some
rep.
They
would
be
eligible
for
three
dxd
as
long
as
they
vote
at
least
once
before.
F
Six
months
from
this
signal
proposals
passage.
So
that
means
anyone.
That's
had
rep.
If
you
vote,
you
participate
in
governance,
you
were
eligible
for
3
dxd.
That
is
vested
over
three
years,
the
when
governance
2.0
launches
and
then
just
in
case.
You
know
so
right
now,
there's
about
450
addresses
for
that
rep
rep
holders.
So
we
shouldn't
run
into
any
problems
with
this.
But
if,
for
some
reason
we
end
up,
you
know
there
ends
up
being
lots
more
rep
distributed
over
the
next
six
months.
F
We
do
have
a
maximum
year
that
a
maximum
2000
dxd
will
be
allocated
to
the
base
distribution
and
then
separate
is
the
proportional
distribution.
So
this
is
like
an
either
or.
F
So
here
we
want
to
be
very
specific.
This
would
be
rewards
that
are
proportional
to
the
percentage
of
rep
that
one
has,
and
so
this
would
be
the
percentage
of
rep
times
ten
thousand
dxd,
and
then
that
address
would
get
it
over
three
years
vesting
and
the
ways
to
qualify
that
are
really
kind
of
two
different
ways.
So
one
would
be
rep
holders
that
have
voted
at
least
three
times
before
the
passage
of
the
governance
2.0
signal
proposition.
F
Here
the
dxd
distribution
will
occur
before
rep
inflation
is
allocated
to
dxt
holders
and
then
that's
because
like
because
we're
invent
we're
inflating
rep
to
dxd
holders,
but
the
distribution
or
calculation
will
happen
before
that
inflation
occurs,
and
then
we
have
a
six
month
claim
period
here.
F
So
dxd
must
be
proactively
claimed
within
six
months
of
the
governance,
2.0
just
dxd
distribution,
and
so
this
is
so
that
any
unclaimed
dxd
would
go
back
to
the
treasury
and
then
the
vesting
schedule,
as
I
mentioned
before,
dxd
will
be
vested
for
three
years
from
when
the
governance
2.0
system
is
implemented.
F
That's
to
ensure
long-term
agreement,
and
we
have
the
ability
here
to
potentially
revoke
some
of
that
and
then
the
dxd
governance
you
usage,
this
allocated
dxd
may
be
used
in
the
governance
system,
so
it
could
be
used
in
the
voting
power
equation
there.
So
just
wanted
to
cut,
stop
and
pause
here
on
the
the
dxd
distribution.
F
So
the
two
types
of
the
base
distribution,
the
proportional
distribution-
and
this
is
really
important
for
anyone
that
has
rep
or
like
how
we
think
about
how
replica
accrue
over
the
coming
months.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
all
workers
have
rep
and
are
getting
rep
report
or
qualifying
for
the
proportional
distribution
and
for
all
of
them
they
should
qualify
in
one
of
these
two
so
either
you
voted
three
times
before
the
passage
or
your
a
new
proposal.
F
Your
new
rep
holder
addresses
that
submits
a
passing
proposal,
because
anyone
that
has
been
a
worker
that
has
received
rep
has
submitted
a
proposal.
That's
passed
so
questions,
thoughts
and
and
comments.
H
I
have
a
small
comment.
I
think
that,
like
in
the
new.
H
Addresses
because
we
did
a
mapping
to
xdi,
then
someone
could
have
like
an
active
address
on
mainnet
and
then
a
different
active
one
on
xi,
because
it's
it's
been
mapped
so
just
to
consider
that
the
mapping
and
make
sure
that
yeah
there's
like
no
duplicates
over
there
does
that
make
sense.
H
B
But
we
also
have
to,
since
this
is
a
percentage
like
a
percentage
of
total
rep
like
what
is
the
total
rep
then
like
yeah,
I
almost
and-
and
I
think
we'll
probably
figure
this
out
eventually,
but
I
you
know
it
seems
a
little
ambiguous
at
this
point
in
time.
So
I
wonder
if
we
should
restrict
this
proposal
to
mainnet,
and
I
mean
it
could
be
that
if
somebody
earns
a
lot
of
rep
on
next
time,
they
can
map
that,
to
you
know
they
can
get
it
on
mainnet
somehow,
but.
H
I
don't
know
just
that.
I
think
that
will
be
solved
like
I'm,
I'm
just
working
on
that
right
now
with
oren.
I
think
that
will
be
solved
before,
like
the
proposal
like
before
governance
2.0
at
least
launches.
B
F
K
B
K
K
So
that's
definitely
nothing
has
to
be
super
final,
but
then
the
other
thing
is
we
are
going
to
have
once
you
remove
all
of
the
rep
holders
that,
like
as
far
as
the
calculation
is
concerned,
like
once,
we
remove
all
the
rep
holders
that
just
voted
once
that
got.
You
know
that
are
getting
the
dxd
that
you
know
the
amount.
It
is
going
to
be
a
weird,
proportionate
thing.
K
Where
we
look
at
you
know
the
balance
of
rep
versus
you
know
the
qualifying
rep
holders,
so
there's
gonna
be
a
weird
kind
of
calculation
that
we're
gonna
have
to
figure
out
regardless,
because
it's
not
gonna,
be
the
full
400
and
whatever
rep
holders
right.
So,
even
if
we
have
to
like
map
it,
or
we
have
to
just
figure
out
some
sort
of
equation
to
incorporate
the
x
die
folks,
I
think
it's
going
to
be.
You
know
it's
going
to
be
a
bit
different
than
what
you're.
K
F
F
That
is
trying
to
be
specific
to
that
base,
whether
that
accounts
for
mainnet
rep-
and
I
think
that's
separate
from
what
we
want
to
focus
on
here,
which
is
everyone
every
contributor
every
month
is
earning
0.167
of
mainnet
rep
right,
but
that's
not
going
to
come
through
a
contract
every
month.
So
we
will
have
to
you
know
map
that
on.
So
I
think
we
definitely
want
to
maintain
that
and
we
definitely
want
to
maintain
the
ability
to
award
mainnet
rep.
F
B
Imagine
if,
like
we,
install
an
arbitrary
base
and
there's
like
you
know,
maybe
because
it's
a
lot
cheaper,
we
get
a
wild
amount
of
activity
and
meant
a
ton
of
rep
on
arbor
trump
right
in
theory.
That
would
mean
that
like
they
could,
I
don't
know,
I
think
they
could
really
mess
this
up
right,
like
yeah.
F
F
So
it's
more
of
a
yeah,
it's
really
more
of
a
qualification
component,
because
what
we,
what
we
want
is
if
a
new
worker
comes
in
in
two
months
like
they
need
to
qualify
for
this
for
in
some
way,
and
we
like
that's
what
the
but
they're,
probably
going
to
do.
Their
proposal
on
x
die
or
another
base,
so
we
need
to
qualify
them,
but
in
the
end,
like
the
proportion
is
still
rep
percentage.
Maybe
we
could
say
main
that
rep
percentage
here
right.
B
So
this
is
that's
what
I'm
saying
like
so
I
understand,
and
I
support
this
idea
that
you
know,
workers
earning
and
other
people
doing
valuable
contributions
over
the
next
six
months
should
participate
right,
but
I
think
in
the
way
yeah,
if
it's
not
clear,
if
all
it
says,
is
just
proposals
like
we
could
you
don't
really
know,
what's
going
to
happen
on
these
other
bases
and
in
the
interim
right
it
could
even
be
longer
than
six
months
right.
So
you
could
end
up
in
a
situation
where
a
lot
of
rap
gets.
B
F
F
If
you
get
rep,
you
somehow
vote
you
qualify
for
the
base
distribution,
but
we
are
limited
like
each
address
is
limited
to
3dxd
and
there's
like
an
overall
2000
one,
that's
limited
and
like
then
the
way
that
you
would
game
this
is
you
first
would
have
to
be
one
of
these
right,
and
so
this
one,
like
you,
can't
game
because
it
won't
be
in
the
future
right
it'll
basically
be
have
you
voted
three
times
like
since
his
proposal
passes
and
if,
if
not,
then
you
like
can't
ever
do
that
or
you're
a
new
rep
holder
address
and
then
you
would
be
able
to
qualify
for
for
proportional,
but
that's
just
the
qualification.
F
That
means
you
would
be
able
to
like
that.
Then
you
would
actually
have
to
earn
a
certain
amount
of
rep
at
that
new
address
to
then
like
gain
the
system.
So
it
would
be
someone
that
earned
that
passes
a
proposal
and
then
somehow
earns
a
lot
of
mainnet
rep
and
like
so
it's
only
based
on
main
network.
In
the
end
right
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
the
only.
F
I
think
we
want
to
be
able
to
like
track
and
award
mainnet
rep
on
other
chains,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
the
only
thing
that
matters
is
what's
on
mainnet
so
like
maybe
in
those
mapping
proposals
that
nylon
is
talking
about.
We
can
like
we
will
reference
different
proposals
that
are
on
xdi
for
people's
worker
proposals
right.
They
said.
Okay,
these
worker
proposals
had
point
one
six,
six,
seven
percent
rep,
and
then
we
just
bundle
those
all
together
and
eventually
put
them
on
mainnet.
F
B
Yes,
I
think
what
we
wanna
do
is
we
wanna
allow
for
people
to
earn
like
worker,
rep,
etc
on
xdi
and
have
that
count
towards
it?
But
we
also
don't
want
to
tie
our
hands
in
terms
of
minting
rep
on
other
potential
bases
for
other
potential
reasons
right
like
maybe,
we
want
to
be
really
aggressive
about
rep
minting
on
arbitrarily
for
all
kinds
of
random
activity
right
and
that
may-
and
it
may
not
really
be
something
that
we'd
want
to
fit
into
this
txt
distribution
right,
like
the
spirit
wouldn't
be.