►
From YouTube: DXdao Weekly Meeting #24 (Resources) [2020-12-10]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
This
call,
you
know
for
the
recent
months
has
been
simply
like
a
recap
of
all
product
kind
of
updates
and
the
goings
on,
and
the
governance
of
the
biz
dev
calls,
which
I
think
has
been
useful,
but
I
think
what
we're
going
to
try
to
do
now
is
alternate
and
do
that.
You
know
once
every
two
weeks
and
on
the
other
week
we'll
do
resource
coordination,
and
in
addition
to
that,
I
think
we're
going
to
attempt
to
transition
like
the
the
information
dissemination
into
more
of
a
bi-weekly
or
maybe
eventually
weekly
newsletter.
A
I
guess,
since
this
is
the
first
like
resource
coordination,
call
I
if
you
link
to
this,
is
just
the
weekly
meeting
post
and
then
I
linked
to
chris's
post
as
well
within
that
and
he
list
he
did
a
great
job
kind
of
like
teeing.
This
meeting
up,
I'm
just
gonna
post
like
his
list
of
questions
and
things
that
we
can
discuss.
A
But
since
this
is
the
first
one
I
guess,
maybe
you
know
we're
gonna
have
to
figure
it
out
as
we
go
here
a
little
bit,
but
probably
part
of
the
goal
here
is
to
actually
define
what
is
this
call?
What
are
we
what's
the
focus?
What
are
the
other
calls
going
to
be
and
like
at
what
level
are
we
talking
about
things
like?
A
I
think
there
is
a
need
to
even
get
down
to
like
what
are
individual
people
doing
like.
Are
they
happy
with
what
they're
doing
on
what
they're
currently
working
on?
Are
they
busy
enough
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
but
I
don't
know,
I
don't
think
we're
going
to
probably
get
to
that
today,
and
maybe
this
isn't
even
the
venue
for
that.
A
I
think
maybe
it
makes
sense
to
start
at
a
little
bit
of
a
higher
level
and
kind
of
talk
about
the
process
itself
and
like
how
you
know,
projects
are
doing
like
at
a
product
level
like
what's
the
staffing
needs
on
each
product?
How
does
it
fit
into
what
we're
doing
like
does?
It
should
have
more
resources,
less
probably
more
at
this
point,
but
like
yeah.
So
with
that,
I
think
maybe
you
can
kick
it
off
chris,
what
powers
or
other
christopher
I
know.
Yet
that's
what
this
stuff
do.
B
B
C
B
B
These
are
things
we
already
kind
of
do,
but
discussing
kind
of
how
that
will
take
place,
and
I
think
you
know
as
we
look
at
2021,
I
think
it's
important
that
we,
you
know,
adapt
the
meeting
schedule
to
different
needs
and
also
think
about
kind
of
incorporating
different
frequencies
right,
whether
it's
a
monthly
meeting
on
partnerships
or
this
kind
of
bi-weekly
one.
I
think
it's
important
to
kind
of
start
the
conversation
on
that
productivity
software
stack.
B
This
is
something
we've
also
been
kind
of
talking
about
in
terms
of
marketing
and
community,
but
there's
also
been
some
discussion
on
like
kind
of
github
management
on
the
development
side.
So
maybe
it's
kind
of
a
way
to
talk
their
current
work
status.
What
are
people
working
on
and
where
are
their
upcoming
gaps?
And
then
this
is
kind
of,
I
think,
a
thing
that
we
struggle
with.
But
just
how
do
we
coordinate
quote?
B
I
think,
specifically
as
it
gets
to
like
what
workers
are
are
doing.
So
I
kind
of
built
off
the
some
of
the
post,
the
fractalization
posts
and
then
also
christopher's
follow-up
on
the
squads,
and
then
we'd
also
done
some
budget
stuff
here.
So
I
just
kind
of
like
said:
okay,
these
are
like
the
squads
or
kind
of
groups
that
we
kind
of
organize
around
and
how
do
we?
How
do
we
kind
of
work
through
it?
B
So
I
do
have
some
color
coordination
here,
which
will
come
in
handy
in
a
second,
so
I
think
these
are
kind
of
the
main
ones
that
we're
all
pretty
familiar
with
right,
oman,
mesa
swapper,
those
are
kind
of
clear
ones,
have
product
and
we're
kind
of
working
on
those
governance.
You
know
kind
of
catches,
all
obviously,
there's
like
a
day-to-day
proposal.
Submissions
and
kind
of
that
whole
thing,
but
there's
also
you
know,
governance
as
a
product.
B
You
know
augustus
is
working
in
kind
of
the
exploding
dap
marketing
community.
This
is
community
management,
content
creation,
also
the
geeksdale
dot,
eth
website
partnerships
and
biz
dev
external
relations.
You
know
how
we
kind
of
funnel
opportunities
into
different
squads
and
then
ecosystem
and
product
development.
This
is
kind
of
a
catch-all
that
I
I
I
had
more
for.
How
do
we
make
these
different
like?
When?
Are
we
spending
time
on
making
these
products
like
interact?
And
then
how
are
we
thinking
more
ahead
about
like
what
products
we
want
to
build?
B
Where
should
like
kind
of
style?
Go?
Maybe
the
longer
term
one-
and
obviously
this
is
just
a
first
go
at
this,
and
I
don't
you
know,
would
be
interested
to
kind
of
hear
some
thoughts
on
on
how
how
these
structures
form
and
and
whether
these
are
kind
of
the
groups
there,
and
I
just
kind
of
put
some
of
the
the
squad
guide
or
maybe
squad
scout
looking
for
different
ones.
B
I
think
people
that
have
kind
of
taken
a
leadership
role
in
these
already
and
are
kind
of
maybe
answerable
to
the
community
without
having
kind
of
a
formal
component,
and
so
what
I
did
was
I
looked
at
all
of
our
contributors
right.
So
I
think
I
hopefully
got
everyone
in
here
and
I
just
kind
of
went
through
on
my
own
and
said
what
are
people
working
on
and
how
much
time
are
they
spending
on
that
right?
B
So
geronimo
is
he's
spending
a
lot
of
time
on
omen
right,
so
he's
got
80
of
his
time
on
omen,
but
he's
also,
you
know,
I
think,
contributing
to
some
conversations
on
swapper
and
mesa
and
how
those
kind
of
interact
and
then
I
think,
for
the
marketing
community.
You
know
he's
been
doing
the
the
website
kind
of
helping
on
the
website
there,
so
you
can
kind
of
see
for
each
of
these
the
same
thing
for
a
gusto
he's
been
working
on
swapper,
but
he's
also
building
the
governance
dap.
B
Yet,
like
you
know,
phil
and
pepo,
and
I
also
just
had
kind
of
an
other
one,
just
as
a
category
to
see
how
we're
I'm
kind
of
allocating
resources.
So
then
I
took
in
the
spreadsheet.
I
looked
at
the
worker
compensation
for
everyone
on
on
this
list
and
I
basically
just
multiplied
your
monthly
compensation
by
the
percentage
time
that
you're
spent
working
on
this
squad
to
come
up
with
some
type
of
monthly
spend
on
each
of
this
squad,
and
so
this
is
where
I
kind
of
landed
out
here.
B
You
know
I
think
swapper
has
is,
is
in.
I
guess
first
place
in
these
rankings
in
terms
of
like,
where
we're
spending
resources.
I
think
that
makes
sense,
considering
we've
kind
of
been
spending
a
lot
of
time
building
and
launching
that
the
last
month-
and
I
think
it's
a
pretty
core
product
second,
is
omen
right.
B
This
is,
this
is
probably
has
the
most
established
team
in
dxdow
work
on
this
product
and
that's
I've
kind
of
been
there
and
then
you
know
everything
else
is
kind
of
spread
out
pretty
evenly
through
the
different
areas
and
kind
of
begins
to
see
a
little
bit
of
of
kind
of
where
our
resources
are
going
and
where
we
should
be
spending
obviously
like
the
mesa.
One,
I
think
is,
is
interesting
because
it's
low-
and
that
also
includes
martin-
who
is-
I
don't
think-
has
submitted
his
worker
proposal
yet.
B
A
A
couple
of
comments
there's
a
little
more
color
on
on
that
about
the
yeah
this
one
so
like
I
think
one
thing
to
point
out
here
is
swapper
is
the
only
product
where
we're
actually
deploying
smart
contracts
to
so
that,
probably,
is
a
that's,
definitely
more
cost
because
it
means
more
on
it.
So
yeah,
I
think
swapper
is
the
driver
of
most
of
our
auditing
budget
swapper
and,
like
governance,
stuff,
integrating
with
things
that's
where
the
smart
contracts
are,
we
haven't
deployed
smart
contracts.
A
B
A
B
Cool
other
thoughts,
I
can't
actually
see
the
chat,
so
if
there
are
questions
there,
I
can't
see
that
but
other
kind
of
thoughts
on
on
this.
How
do
people
kind
of
any
surprises
in
terms
of
like
maybe
where
we're
spending
kind
of
resources
or
anything
that
maybe
we
yeah
kind
of
off
the
bat
wanna
change
and,
as
john
said,
this
is
like
forward-looking
and
I'd,
say:
kind
of
represents
yeah
the
next
month
or
two.
B
Yeah
and
so
just
to
kind
of
look
at
the
breakdown
here,
so
blue
is
swapper
here,
so
people
that
are
kind
of
contributing
to
this,
and
this
is
and
again
this
is
like
what
I
kind
of
put
here,
but
because
it
is,
you
know
we
have
the
smart
contract
component
and
the
auditor
right.
So
you
can
see.
I
have
60
of
phil's
time
on
swapper
and
then
obviously
federico
I've
got
80
and
I've
got
rails
under
ecosystem
and
product
development.
B
A
Well,
yeah,
it
totally
makes
sense
like
auditing
is
definitely
like
a
front
loaded
cost
like
it's.
What
you
doing
that
kind
of
before
you
deploy
smart
contracts,
and
then
you
know
like
for
the
swapper
core
contracts,
for
example.
They,
you
know
they're
kind
of
immutable,
and
not
so
you
know
we
might
do
more
smart
contracts
around
swapper
like
staking
contracts
etc,
which
will
require
audits
but
yeah.
I
definitely
agree
that
that
element
of
the
cost
will
probably
go
down
or
is
front
loaded
would
be
a
little
bigger.
E
E
E
E
B
Yeah
I
mean
I,
I
think
this
is
kind
of
meant
to
be
like
a
a
state
of
where
we're
at
and
kind
of
how
we
on.
I
think
the
discussion
on
like
onboarding
and
funneling
people
is
is.
That
is
important.
We
kind
of
think
about
how
to
do
that
too.
I
don't
know
if
squad
guides
are
like
important
to
that
kind
of
component.
A
Budgeting
stuff,
I
mean,
I
think,
that
the
individual,
like
thing
is,
is
important,
for
you
know,
coordination
amongst
those
those
people
and
for
the
people
who
are
getting
organized
in
the
in
the
spots
but
yeah.
I
don't
think
that
your
average
community
voter
should
have
to
worry
about
that
bigger
chart.
So.
C
B
Yeah,
I
do,
I
guess
I
think
it's
like
a
separate
thing.
I
think
we
need
to
like
work
worry
on
like
like.
I
completely
agree
that
everyone
should
not
be
voting
on
every
single
individual
worker
proposal
like
as
like
a
long
term
thing
or
kind
of
need
that,
and
we
need
to
figure
out
how
to
kind
of
structure
that.
F
Is
there
someone
in
the
in
this
community
or
outside
the
community
that
I
can
pull
in,
because
I
need
more
help
on
this
squad,
so
knowing
the
state
of
is
great,
but
then
how
to
alter
this?
Like?
Oh
wait,
we
don't
need.
We
don't
need
this.
Many
people
on
swapper
the
next
month,
because
we've
launched
it
and
now
we'll
have
extra
resources
that
we're
doing
swapper.
Where
do
we?
Where
do
we
reallocate
those?
B
I
think
that's
like
what
we
should
be
doing
on
like
this.
This
call
right
and
I
think
we're
taking
that
kind
of
high
level
view
of
being
like
and
just
seeing
how
we're
spending
on
swapper
I
mean,
I
think
it's
about
zed
and
john
kind
of
said
was:
oh
well,
that's
where
our
resources
are
being
voted
now,
but
in
a
month
or
two
like
that's,
probably
not
going
to
be
so
where
will
those
yeah
resources
go
and
that's
yeah,
that's
kind
of
like
the
the
next
level
of
coordination
between
the
the
squads.
F
F
On
these
two
months,
so
so
I
think
what
to
me
what
christopher
is
raising
is
like.
Okay,
the
budget
for
this
past
month
for
swapper
was
like
30k
like.
If
we
have
a
roadmap
and
the
the
swapper
squad
thinks
over
the
next
three
months,
we're
gonna
need
more
resources
than
we
had.
We're.
Probably
gonna
need
a
budget
of
40k
per
month
for
the
next
three
months.
F
So
do
does
the
dow
say:
okay,
we're
allocating
120k
towards
swapper,
and
then
that
gets
divided
as
needed
per
month,
or
is
that
like,
or
is
it
we
have
all
the
resources
that
are
available?
Can
we
pull
from
existing
known
resources
into
swapper
rather
than
like
say
here?
Is
the
budget
and
then
push
it
the
budget
down
at
people?
So
there's
like
two
different
approaches:
one
is
they're
they're
opposite
each
other.
Actually.
E
E
You
know
like
the
timeline
in
how
many
people
they
need
and
over
how
long
time
horizon
they
want
to
do
it,
and
not
just
you
know
like
one
or
two
months,
but
ideally
at
least
three
months,
and
then
they
defend
that
budget
against
us,
the
community,
and
then
we
either
say
yes
or
no,
and
then
that
budget
will
be
released
on
a
monthly
basis.
If
we
have
decided
to
do
that.
B
I
actually
not
just
budget,
I
would
say,
like
road
map
or
like
strategy
kind
of
like
this
is
what
we're
doing
over
the
next
couple
months
and
it's
gonna
like
this
is
the
budget
for
it
and
that
kind
of
goes
together
and
then
that's
what
like
a
community
could
could
vote
on.
I
think
that's
definitely
where
we
should
be
moving
towards
and
those
are
like
the
kind
of
almost
like
quarterly
reports
or
quarterly,
like
forward
looking
guidance,
but
just
the
plan.
E
Yes,
exactly
right,
my
point
is
just
what
I'm
trying
to
like
you
know
emphasize
here
and
which
I'm
not
sure
like,
which
is
coming
across
correctly.
Is
that
you
know
defending
that.
You
know,
like
all
like
the
community
will
need,
like
basically
one
person
to
interact
with
that
in
regards
to
that
right
that
they
can
like
really
grill
on
these
questions.
E
They
cannot
like
ask
the
same
five
questions
to
like
five
people,
but
then
also
short
responsibility
is
like
always
kind
of
like
you
know.
Someone
else
will
take
care
of
it
right,
but
if
we
have
like
this
scout
who's,
more
or
less
responsible
for
it,
we
can
have
like
a
much
more.
You
know
like
a
tighter
feedback
loop
as
well
between
the
community
and
the
sports
yeah.
It's.
G
B
B
That
yeah
as
kind
of
milan,
says
that
kind
of
gives
a
lot
of
power
to
a
single
individual,
and
I
I
kind
of
prefer
is
like
how
can
we
create
a
governance
structure
for
those
squads
to
accomplish
the
same
kind
of
accountability
that
you're
talking
about
with
a
single
individual?
I
think
this
is
kind
of
where
you
get
into
like
actual
sub-dials
and
like
fractal.
You
know
fractalization,
and
I
think
that
the
governance
of
that
is
a
challenge,
but
I
think
that
we
can.
E
I
mean
the
thing
is
it's
it's
I
mean,
I
don't
really
think
you
know
we
are
babies,
basically
giving
them
like
a
blank
check
in
order
to
do
whatever
they
want
right
I
mean
they
have
to
kind
of
like
report
back
to
the
community,
like
maybe
like
on
a
weekly
or
bi-weekly
basis,
and
the
community
can
still
like
decide.
Okay,
like
yeah.
E
Well,
that
is
that
is
kind
of
like
you
know,
also
like
one
of
the
problems
right,
because
you
know
with
all
of
these
people.
You
know
that
are
participating
in
the
squad
now,
who,
like
the
community,
cannot
make
any
judgment
calls
on
these
on
the
quality
of
these
people.
Maybe
there
are
some
bad
actors
in
there,
but
you
know
because
you
don't
want
to
like
be
the
guy.
You
know
that
turns
out
points
out.
You
know
that
someone
is
bad.
E
F
So
as
an
example
like,
let's
say,
swapper
has
a
super
ambitious
goal
to
like
do
everything
on
its
roadmap
over
the
next
three
months
and
zett
basically
decides
that
you
need
50
grand.
You
need
50k
a
month
for
the
next
three
months
to
accomplish
those
goals,
and
then
he
has
that
budget
that's
approved.
F
He
still
is
pulling
from
like
these
limited
resources
like
if
he
pulls
resources
to
towards
that
goal,
they're
coming
away
from
one
of
the
other
squads
right
like
how
does
that?
How
is
that
even
going
to
work
like
well?
How
does
that
number?
Who?
How
does
it?
How
do
you
know
that
50k
is
the
right
number
and
then
what
do
you
do
with
the
50k.
E
Well,
that
is,
that
is
like
relatively
easy
right
so,
like
I
mean
that
would
in
that
specific
case
that
would
present
to
the
community
and
like
probably
like
in
a
specific
call
like
his
budget
and
his
timeline,
and
then
he
defends
that
right
and
then
we
can
ask
like
specific
questions
like
how
did
you
arrive
at
50k
and
then
he
probably
has
like
some
good
answers
in
terms
of
like
that.
He
needs
six
full-time
people
on
this
for
every
month
or
that
he
has
like
some
other
auditing
expenses,
etc.
A
I
think
I
think
accountability
it
yeah.
It
becomes
a
little
bit
tricky
right.
Like
I
mean
I
think
it's
all
public,
so
you
could
do
that
right.
You
can
go
to
anybody,
but
I
think
it's
good
for
people
to
know
like
who
is
like.
If
you
have
a
question
about
the
timeline
or
the
roadmap
like
who,
should
you
go
to
like?
A
First
right,
you
should
be
able
to
see
everything
like
who's,
who
all
is
working
on
that
currently,
and
you
could
ask
anybody
any
question
if
you
really
wanted
to
but
like
yeah,
but
like
I,
I
generally
agree
with
what
christopher's
saying
is
like
there
should
be
somebody
accountable
for
each
of
the
squads.
I
think,
to
balance
out
kind
of
like
that,
that
you
know
the
influence
or
power
that
may
come
with
that
kind
of
squad
scout.
That's
what
we're
calling
it
whatever
it
is.
A
I
think
some
kind
of
like
peer-to-peer
review
on
terms
of
like
worker
performance
or
like
worker,
like
you,
know,
yeah
what
whether
people
are
living
up
to
their
worker
proposals
to
like
balance
that
out
like
so
maybe,
for
example,
you
know
for
q1,
like
the
omen
squad
is
auditing,
like
the
swapper
squad
and
the
swapper
squad
is
auditing,
the
basic
squad
and
the
missed
squads
auditing,
the
omen
squad,
or
whatever
and
they're
involved
in,
like
some
of
their
pr
review,
etc.
Right
and
that
that
maybe
put
some
kind
of
checks
on
the
yeah.
E
Something
something
like
that
could
work
right,
but
it
would
also
introduce
like
a
lot
of
overhead.
My
main
concern
is
you
know,
let's
just
assume
you
know
I
mean
I'm
not
talking
about
like
anyone's
you
know,
but
just
like
this
extremely
hypothetical
stigma
scenario
now
right.
So
we
have
that
you
know
he's
working
on
swapper
and
he's
presenting
like
this
budget
and
what's
what
he
wants
to
do
right,
but
then,
like
all
the
other
people
who
want
to
work
on
on
on
swapper
as
well,
I
mean
obviously
they
are
not.
E
I
want
to
stress
this.
This
is
an
extremely
hypothetical
scenario
right,
but
imagine
they
are
all
bad
actors
right,
but
the
community
cannot
decide
that
right,
but
they
are
like
saying
they
are
like
schmoozing
to
the
community
and
they
are
saying
we
want
to
participate
in
that.
You
know
we
would
be
doing
this
for
relatively
little
money
right,
but
then
like
that,
would
have
basically
almost
no
chance
of
achieving
his
goals
if
the
community
more
or
less
decides
who
has
to
work
with
that
on
swapper.
A
I
H
I
I
I
think
so
like
just
to
add
in
here.
I
think
it's
just
for
the
sake
of
having
someone
accountable
for
that
specific
thing.
I
don't
think
it's
there's
nothing
formal,
there's!
No,
like
a
contract
that
allocates
you
know
that
the
actual
or
what
we
call
it
scout
so
like
so
he's
not
like
any.
There.
Isn't
anything
official
he's
just
like
taking
the
role
of
that
and
you
know,
he's
representing
basically
the
interest
of
swapper
in
front
of
the
dx
down
we're.
A
B
Yeah,
I
actually
don't
think
we're
like,
I
think,
we're
mostly
in
agreement
and
we're
kind
of
like
on,
like
looking
for,
like
a
baseball
analogy,
we're
on
like
second
base
or
in
like
the
third
inning
here
of
of
like
building
kind
of
towards
this
end,
and
I
think
it
it
we
just
filling
out
the
details
are
yeah.
I
guess
the
devil
is
in
the
details
here
on
kind
of
how
we
accomplish
this,
but
I
think
everyone
like
wants
accountability.
B
Everyone
kind
of
sees
how
certain
individuals
can
rise
to
kind
of
be
a
voice
for
a
product
to
the
community
and
kind
of
take
on
take
on
that
responsibility
and
answer
to
the
community
and
then
just
like
the
questions
exactly
how
we,
how
we
do
it
like
I'm
happy
to
talk
about
this
a
bit
more,
but
I
did
just
want
to
like
make
sure
we
had
time
to
kind
of
go.
Go
over
some
of
the
the
other
things
that
we
were
kind
of
hoping
to
hit
on
today.
A
Yeah,
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
get
to
the
meetings
kind
of
the
meta
like
what
like.
We
need
to
flesh
that
what
we
were
just
discussing
out
right
and
like
formalize
a
little
bit,
and
so,
where
should
that?
Is
that
gonna
be
this
meeting
or
is
that
you
know?
Do
we
do
that
on
the
friday
product
strategy
meeting
instead,
like
I
don't
know,
you
know,
which
is
where
do
things
go.
A
I
So
this
might
be,
you
know
it's
kind
of
like
the
first
point
meetings
and
then
I
think
it
relates
to
the
productivity
software
stack.
So
we
had
a
meeting.
We
have
notes
where
they
go.
I
think
right
now
everything
has
been
logged
in
the
dow
talk
forum,
but
I
I
don't
know
if
that's
really
good,
for
you
know
I
guess
dao
management
I'll
call
it.
Then
the
question
is
like
I
personally
like
something
that
I
find
that's
missing.
A
D
Is
there
is
templates
for
this
like
we
could
try
out,
but
it
this
is
a
high
level
thing
I
would
say
like
from
going
from
not
nothing
to
this.
I
think
it's
a
big
step.
Maybe
we
should
just
try
like
a
smaller
step
first
and
then
go
up
to
action
points
and
then
like
we
could
try.
I
think,
take
one
step
at
a
time.
I
think
I
scared
the
guys
when
I
showed
this
template
it's
a
little
bit
much.
D
First
of
all,
just
like
having
all
notes
and
recordings
and
meetings
on
like
on
the
same
place
on
like
a
record,
so
you
can
go
back
and
see.
What
did
you
talk
about
and
which
day
and
is
there
a
recording?
That's
that's
the
first
step
I
would
say
next
step
is
having
action
points
and
assigning
people
to
those
and
tracking.
B
Those
skye
is
someone
who
I
think
I
guess
you
kind
of
log
our
meetings
now
I
would
say-
or
at
least
the
recordings
of
those-
and
you
know
it's-
I
always
like
when
I
see
see
this
guy
uploaded
a
new
video,
because
it's
something
to
kind
of
check
out,
but
I
know
that's
something
you're,
basically
doing
almost
every
day.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
have
any
thoughts
on
kind
of
how
the
logging
reporting
process
goes.
F
Yeah,
so
what
I've
seen
in
other
group
meetups,
whether
gnosis
some
gnosis
meetings
or
like,
like
a
omen,
gnosis
conduction,
conduction,
conditional
token
framework
meeting
that
happens
once
a
week,
there's
like
a
a
doc,
a
google
doc
or
a
hack,
md
and
there's
literally
a
date
with
every,
and
this
is
all
one
like
now.
It's
30
pages
long
right
it
has
the
meeting
date
has
the
agenda
and
then
it
has
notes
and
action
items
that
happen
during
that
meeting
and
it
really
could
be
communal.
F
Unless
you
have
like
one
dedicated
recorder
person
who
records
like
the
the
notes,
are
usually
linked
to
the
agenda
items
right
so
that
that's,
you
basically
need
a
note
taker
for
every
meeting
and
so
we're
recording
the
call
which
has
a
video.
But
if
you
had
a
note
taker,
which
is
in
addition
to
the
laid
out
prior
agenda,
so
everyone
everyone's
looking
at
the
same
document,
the
entire
meeting.
That
will
become
a
record
of
that
meeting
versus
like
the
air
table,
idea
that
that's
talking
about
someone.
F
One
person
has
to
like
fill
out
this
form
and
it
goes
and
it
goes
and
gets
sent
off
somewhere.
But
then
it
doesn't
like
link
to
every
other
meeting.
That
also
happened.
So
we
could
try
this
communal
doc,
which
is
just
a
record
a
list
of
every
meeting.
That's
ever
happened
in
a
row
and
the
details
and
action
items
from
each
meeting.
D
On
air
table,
actually
there
is
like
first
of
all,
you
can
connect
anything
and
like
it's
literally,
you
can
do
any
feature
on
it,
but
on
this
template
they
connected
something
called
discussion
topics.
So
if
you
have
a
meeting
and
then
you're
discussing
farming
on
swapper
and
then
that
topic
could
be
like
tagged
and
then
you
you
have
that
topic
and
you
can
click
to
it.
D
So
there
is
like
features
connected
to
it
that
that,
like
it
connects
stuff,
it
just
doesn't
just
give
you
the
note
separated,
but
it
depends
on
like
how
good
how
well
we
document
these
things
and
how
well
we
use
airtable,
but
I
would
start
out
basic
because
I
I
know
all
this
sounds
good
and
like,
but
in
in
reality
you
actually
need
someone
owning
this
and
doing
this
for
real
and
not
just
doing
it.
Maybe
one
to
three
weeks.
I
I
kind
of
I
kind
of
want
to
say
that
an
action
item
should
be
like
that.
You
proceed
with
airtable
sky.
You
proceed
with
logging
that
and
I
want
to
have
time
to
do
the
same
thing
with
notion,
and
then
you
know
after
like
a
month
or
so
decide
like
what
we
want
to
use
or
what
we
want
to
formally
use
the
most.
B
B
That's
an
addition
right.
So
maybe
that's
like
kind
of
to
this.
It's
like
agenda
video
follow-up,
but
during
there's
like
in
every
meeting,
there's
like
a
document
that
is
kind
of
there-
and
I
actually
sometimes
do
this
with
the
swapper
call.
I
like
put
the
agenda,
as
I
guess,
you're
saying
you
put
the
agenda
in
there
and
then
you
kind
of
share
that
document
yeah.
I
feel
like
those
are
kind
of
good
components
of
whatever
like
software
or
thing
we
would.
We
would
use.
F
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
know
it
works
with
google
docs.
If
we
don't
want
to
use
google,
we
could
try
hack,
md
and
then
there's
like
some
more
advanced
ones
like
there's
this
one
called
table
or
something
that's
like.
Apparently,
you
can
embed
it
into
into
jitsi,
which
I
shared
in
the
in
the
governance
channel,
but.
B
We
should
integrate
anything
that
integrates
with
jitsi.
Just
that's
her.
It's
slightly
separate.
I
do
think
we
need
to
like,
besides
like
logging
and
how
we're
doing
that-
and
I
think
I,
like
kind
of
elon's
takeaways
kind
of
the
action
items
here.
There's
like
I
guess
three
different
systems
we
can
kind
of
all
try
out,
but
each
the
important
thing
is,
like
figuring
out
the
best
way
to
document
those.
I
do
think
we
need
to
have
different
meeting
schedules
than
the
weekly
meetings.
B
I
think
that
was
like
a
a
really
great
way
of
kind
of
kicking
us
off,
but
I
think
we
need
to
think
about
these
on
and
kind
of
plan
ahead
really
for
2021.
So
I
think
this
meeting
is
like
the
first
step
of
that
right.
You
can
see
how
every
like
two
weeks,
we're
kind
of
checking
in
on
these
resources,
and
I
probably
think
every
squad
needs
to
have
like
a
monthly
call
right.
That's
just
going
over
things
with
the
community
and
then
maybe
like
every
quarter.
B
There's
a
like
presentation
of
the
status
of
the
squad
and
you
know
other
other
kind
of
like
monthly
cadence
meetings
that
we
can
kind
of
schedule
around.
So
we
can,
you
know,
build
in
these
opportunities
to
like
take
macro
views
of
the
excel,
rather
than
just
like
you
know,
when
we
run
into
a
wall
being
like
okay,
we
all
need
to
stop
what
we're
doing
and
like
take
a
high
level
high
level
view.
So
what
are
kind
of
people
think
about
like
meeting
other
meetings
and
like
how
to
incorporate.
B
A
B
B
A
Well,
I
think,
like
maybe
the
product
strategy
meeting
on
friday
would
be
a
good
place
to
start
talking
about
it.
But
I
think
we
also
should
think
about
how
to
engage
the
wider
community
right
and
if
we're
making
a
big
decision
like
what
is
the
next?
Are
we
going
to
launch
another
product
or
are
we
getting
out
of
something
that
doesn't
seem
to
be
going
well,
like
kind
of
like
significant
direction,
changes
in
any
of
the
overall
products.
B
A
B
I
was
just
gonna
say:
is
that
something
we
could?
I
think
we
could
kind
of
I'm
kind
of
thinking
as
the
takeaway
here
or
like
how
do
we
kind
of
push
forward
on
say
that
is
maybe
by
the
end
of
the
month
or
you
know,
beginning
of
january.
Each
of
the
squads
have
a
monthly
call
that
they're
kind
of
presenting
on,
and
I
I
actually
think
this
goes
pretty
hand
in
hand
with
some
of
the
discussion
that
pope's
been
having
about
creating
like
more
engagement
with
with
voters
on
larger
macro
level
proposals.
H
I
Yeah
I
I
just
want
to
say
I
think
it
sounds
great.
Just
the
you
know
the
section
of
of
let's
say
the
budget.
I
don't
think
we
should
touch
on
this
right
now
I
mean
this
is
like
first
get.
It
rolling,
have
still
the
budget
structure
the
same
as
it
is
right
now
and
then,
as
things
progress,
you
know
after
the
squad
is
already
live,
then
for
a
few
months,
then
zet
is
kind
of
like
okay.
Let's
build
a
roadmap
for
the
squad
and
request
the
budget
for
the
squad
and
et
cetera.
H
Yeah,
it's
also
like.
I
would
also
keen
to
experiment
a
little
bit
more
like
with
the
omen
team.
There's,
no
reason
why
we
like,
I
envisioned
like
an
x-style
omen
squad
doll
which
will
get
like
the
the
budget
payment
to
the
dow
itself,
which,
like
that
that's
like
one
experiment,
we
could
try.
The
the
downside
is
that
the
omen
squad
will
like
do
the
experiment
on
it
on
its
own
and
the
the
rest
of
the
squads
will
do
like
improve
on
their
own
without
an
on-chain
system
being
used.
H
If,
like
we,
I
could
imagine
that
the
omen
team
could
prepare
roadmap
with
a
budget
for
the
next
three
months,
which
will
go
instead
of
like
a
multi-stick
or
something.
We
would
use
an
x-style
dow
down
for
like
an
omen.
Opera,
operational
dow,
which
could
experiment
with
verifying
markets
on
extinct,
omen
and
more
stuff
going
forward.
A
I
Yeah,
I
think
that
could
be
great.
I
think
omen
is
also
the
most
kind
of
baked
for
something
like
that.
It
could
be
a
great
experiment.
I
feel
like
a
quarterly
planning
might
be
a
bit
too
much.
I
mean
I
would
say
like
don't
I
mean,
don't
make
it
too
detailed,
but
yeah
I
mean
I
think
this.
This
is
great
and,
like
that's
the
overall.
H
Question
it
could
create
a
little
bit
of
confusion.
I
think
it's
it's
a
right
step
forward
because
I
think,
like
christopher
said,
this
fractalization
of
of
squads
into
like
on-chain
systems,
which
which
are
connected
to
the
to
the
mothership,
is
probably
the
right
way
forward,
just
inter
like
in
terms
of
scalability,
and
we
could
start
experimenting
with
like
the
another.
H
Good
thing
is
that
we
would
request
the
budget
once
so.
It
would
just
require
one
proposal,
so
we
will
eliminate
mainnet
proposals.
If,
if
the
omen
sport
is
like
going
the
bad
route
route
as
like
a
as
a
team,
so
bad
actors,
we
could
all
be
slashed.
So
I
I'm
actually
very
skeptical
about
established
teams
going
bads
at
some
point
in
time,
because
they
have
like
a
reputation
at
stake.
H
E
B
E
Yeah
yeah,
I
would.
I
would
like
to
see
it
like
this
experiment
with
omen
or
like
any
other
squad
for
that
matter.
Like
I'm
especially
worried
about
all
these
worker
proposals.
Getting
I
mean
it's
it's
great,
that
we
have
that
that
much
traction.
That's
amazing.
It's
just
really
becoming
too
much
to
handle.
D
D
This
is
what
we
think,
like
you
ask
the
relevant
people
that
is
already
workers,
because,
first
of
all
they
are,
they
have
better
view
of
what
is
going
on
inside,
of
like
working
with
the
exile
and
then
the
second
step
would
be
like
the
community
reporters
or
workers
could
just
go
in
and
read
like.
This
is
what
the
relevant
people
think
about
this
first.
So
in
as
an
example,
if
someone
wants
to
work
with
swapper,
I
would
be
the
one
like.
I
would
100
go
in
and
comment
on
that
and
say
this
is.
D
This
is
good.
This
is
what
we
need
or,
or
you
could
edit,
whatever
requirements
you
put
in
there
and
put
up
this
goal,
and
then
we
could.
We
could
vote
on
this.
Like
that
opinion,
I
think
would
weigh
a
lot.
It's
super
hard
to
maybe
just
vote
randomly
on
people,
but
I
think
that
that
could
be
a
like
a
a
big
step
for
us
to
do.
Just
have
the
right
people
discuss
this
before
voting.
A
D
Yeah
I
mean
it's
super
hard
like
to
be
like.
I
take
this
designer
as
an
example,
so
his
portfolio
looked
good
and
from
someone
from
outwards
that,
like
we
me
and
geronimo,
had
a
call
with
the
designer,
and
in
that
call
he
we
got
a
lot
of
info,
and
that
info
gave
us
impression
that
this
guy
wouldn't
work
out
with
us
internally
and
and
and
he
needed
to
like,
have
a
couple
of
things
fixed
out
before
he
could
start
working
with
us.
D
B
I
do
think
we've
done
a
good
job,
the
last
week
or
two
on
worker
proposals,
just
in
people
replying,
I
feel
like
even
the
existing
ones.
I
feel
like
there
has
been
more
conversation
in
the
forums
on
worker
proposals.
There
has
been
in
the
past,
but
I
agree
completely.
What's
that
saying
it's
their
their
just.
The
follow-up
is
is
important.
H
H
Do
you
actually
really
want
to
like
give
an
honest
review
for
the
collective
right
so
and
that's
another
signal
for
me
that
the
omen
team
could
continue
doing
that,
like
basically
pushing
themselves
up
to
represent
themselves
as
like,
very
positive
as
like
fake,
like?
How
does
the
the
other
sports
know
that
we
actually
recrea
writing
honest
reviews,
and
I
think,
fractalization
and
like
sub
dolls-
are
the
only
solution
because
then
yeah.
The
subtitle
itself
needs
to
care
about
the
the
healthiness
of
of
the
doubt
of
the
subtle,
because
we
have
a
budget.
B
B
I
think
it
was
experiment
with
air
table
notion
and
I
think
the
one
other,
but
that
for
each
meeting
we
should
have
or
each
meeting
that
we're
logging
we
should
have
agenda
and
then
one
shared
notes,
follow-up
and
also
follow-up
would
be
with
with
with
action
items
or
anything
else,
and
then
the
last
one
would
be
video
just
because
we're
yeah
chris.
Can
you
see.
F
D
And
what
happens
when
it's
gone
a
year
or
like
what
happens
when
we
like?
How
do
you
filter
stuff
search
the
date?
So
I
I
don't
like
this
is
where,
where
I
like,
want
us
to
use
like
air
table
or
notion
it's
because
of
this,
it's
not
because
of
the
actual
note-taking.
It's
not
about
just
to
have
a
database.
There
is
searchable
easy
to
access.
You
don't
need
accounts.
Yeah
like
this
is
my
thinking
I
have
no
like.