►
From YouTube: DXdao Weekly Meeting #30 (Recap) [2021-02-04]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
to
the
weekly
dx,
dow,
all
community
meeting,
where
we
talk
about
recent
happenings
and
how
to
recap
things
that
have
been
going
on
product
development.
Typically,
we
start
with
bowman
and
sean.
What
do
you
want
to
lead
us.
B
Off
yeah,
we
finally
released
the
new
version,
which
includes
two
major
features,
which
is
omen
or
nexti
and
finally
scalar
markets.
B
But
the
fact
that,
like
this
was
like
a
cross-team
effort
through
with
gnosis
and
claros
and
the
dxo
team,
there
were
like
several
delays,
but
we
we
kind
of
finished
that
and
we
are
ready
to
release
because
we
had
a
lot
of
delays.
We
actually
included
a
lot
of
other
fixes
to
make
sure
that
the
experience
is
great
on
xi
and
that's
mainly
it
yep.
Any
questions.
C
I
think
that
obviously
xdi
is
exciting
just
for
the
gas
stuff,
and
it
opens
up
a
lot
of
capabilities,
but
just
even
seeing
the
scalar
market
that
I
think
this
is
the
first
funded
one.
I
think
it's
cool
ui,
first
off
they
kind
of
capture
something
really
completely
new
and
like
just
looking
at
it,
you
can
kind
of.
C
You
could
see
it's
like
a
new
financial
product
right
because
it's
not
like
will
eath
be
above
this
one
or
that
one
it's
like
this
is
what
people
expect
the
price
to
be
in
the
future
and
looking
at
on
that
that
scale
is,
is
really
cool,
and
even
just
thinking
about
how
you
get
like
in
in
traditional
financing.
People
talk
about
like
the
yield
curve
right
as
a
way
of
like
forward-looking
credit
markets
and
like
the
way
they're
doing
that
is
they're
just
putting
all
of
these
little
basically
categorical
markets
together
right.
C
This
is
like
yes
or
no,
yes,
or
no,
yes,
or
no,
and
you
put
them
together,
you
can
get
something
forward.
Looking
like
that,
and
obviously
like
this
is
just
rolling
that
into
a
single
contract
or
a
single
financial
derivative.
So
I
think
it's
the
scalar
markets
are
are
really
exciting,
especially
for
the
financial
like
pure
financial
applications,
for
it.
B
Yeah,
I
totally
agree
like
it's.
It
sounds
like
a
complex
thing,
but
if
you
look
at
the
like
market
details
view,
it's
very
simple,
like
our
goal
was
to
make
it
extremely
simple,
and
the
only
thing
you
see
is
just
like
a
scale
and
where
it
is
and
where
it
could
go
and
the
like.
The
user
just
needs
to
know
like
okay.
B
This
is
the
current
prediction
and
the
only
question
the
user
needs
to
answer
is
like
do,
I
believe
in
the
current
prediction,
and
do
I
want
to
push
the
needle
to
the
left
or
to
the
right
like
to
to
the
lower
bound
or
to
the
upper
bound?
It's
like
a
very
simple
question,
so
I
with
like
scalability
or
next
time.
B
I
hope
that
basically,
everyone
can
participate
in
the
question
like
is
the
needle
on
the
right
spot
and
if
not,
I'm
gonna
trade
on
it,
because
it's
simple,
like
I,
don't
believe
right
now,
heath
will
be
at
1900
at
the
end
of
february.
So
it's
a
pretty
simple
bet
in
my
view,
so
I'm
like
very
curious
how
scala
markets
will
evolve.
At
the
same
time,
life
liquidity
provision
is
very
like
even
more
a
big
question
mark,
but
could
be
a
very
big
thing
for
financial
products
so
like
we
need
to
explore
it.
B
So
we
need
to
observe
it
and
a
lot
of
things
to
improve
like
we
have
a
huge
list
on
things
where
we
know
in
terms
of
user
experience,
we
can
improve
and
should
improve
specif
specifically
for
scalar
markets
and
yeah.
It's
just
the
beginning,
so
very
curious
how
this
will
evolve.
A
And
probably
also
worth
mentioning
that
last
week
you
know
a
few
of
us
here
and
worked
on
making
a
post
on.
Don't
talk
about
this
idea
for
an
omen
guild
and
omn
token
there's
looking
at
the
post
now,
it's
gotten
a
bunch
of
likes.
Surprisingly,
no
comments,
not
really
any
discussion
under
that
so
and
I
guess
people
are
into.
D
A
D
A
Think
it's
something
that
will
probably
get
discussed
tomorrow,
probably
tomorrow
on
the
product
strategy
called
imagine
like
what
next
steps
might
be.
I
think
this
is
just
kind
of
a
proposed
idea
at
this
point.
A
E
Yeah,
so
martin
is
here
in
the
call,
but
he's
not
able
to
speak
so,
I'm
happy
to
take
over
for
him
today,
yeah
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
things
going
on
on
the
mesa
side
of
things
like
from
a
chief
team's
perspective
like
a
lot
of
workers
during
the
last
few
days,
and
it's
actually
pretty
looking
pretty
good.
E
So
as
of
now,
we
have
actually
martin
on
the
team
as
a
product
manager
bertie
joined
us
last
week,
who
will
be
now
working
on
the
front
end,
and
we
expect
like
first
draft
crafts
of
the
front
end
and
end
of
february,
where
we
will
work
on
adam,
took
over
last
week
last
two
weeks
ago
on
the
front
end
and
it's
now
joined
by
hamsar,
which
just
started
to
contributing,
and
I
am
working
on
these
smart
contracts
and
happy
to
hopefully
get
tau
on
board
as
well.
A
E
A
pretty
powerful
team
there
to
to
deliver
what
we
plan
to
and
we
are
meanwhile
focusing
on
delivering
the
dmvp,
which
we
try
to
deliver
end
of
q1
and
yeah.
So
there's
some
progress
on
the
front
end
bertie
is
working
on
the
design,
as
mentioned,
and
also
some
progress
on
the
smart
contract
side
of
syncs,
which
we
hopefully
can
bring
into
audit
android
fabric
already.
A
Okay,
thanks
nico
good
to
hear
about
the
recruiting
efforts
going
well,
it's
obviously
it's
been
a
big
need
across
the
products
to
get
a
little
bit
more
dev
help.
So
that's
good
to
hear
any
questions
about
mesa.
F
Hey
guys
so
swapper
is
moving
forward,
we're
doing
a
lot
of
front-end
stuff
working
on
both
the
governance
ui
and
we
are
working
on
the
farming
and
farming
is
what
we
are
planning
for.
The
next
big
release
and
frederick
has
been
doing
some
really
nice.
G
F
There
yeah
that's
from
the
front-end
side.
F
We
are
also
looking
for
a
team
to
help
us
with
aggregation
of
of
different
swaps
and
that's
on
our
release
radar,
but
it's
for
later
releases,
but
I
think
I
think
that's
that
that
will
decide
when
swapper
v1
will
be
released.
So
so
it's
it's
an
important
part
of
swapper
and
yeah.
A
Yeah
I've
been
help
trying
to
help
on
the
recruiting
effort
there,
for
the
aggregation
piece
been
talking
to
a
couple
of
senior
blockchain
engineers
with
exchange
experience
and
trying
to
figure
out
to
see
if
one
of
them
can
help
with
this
particular
feature.
Given
everybody
is
busy
with
everything
so
and
the
in
the
the
guild
contracts
for
the
governance
and
the
farming
contracts
have
both
been
audited
now
and
and
audits.
A
Both
went
pretty
well
just
some
minor
changes
being
addressed
and
both
are,
I
think
I
think
the
farming
ones
are
basically
ready
to
go
and
the
guild
one
should
be
ready
soon.
C
Well,
just
as
an
additional
update,
I
think,
were
the
first
test
deposit
for
the
adding
liquidity
to
swapper.
I
think
the
proposal
has
just
been
submitted
and
so
that'll
be
kind
of
the
first
step
before
geek
style
was
providing
liquidity
on
swapper
yeah.
A
Good
point
good
point:
yeah,
there's
a
test
to
deposit,
it's
like
5000
die
and
some
ether
corresponding
about
ether
into
a
swapper
using
the
liquid
there
and
yeah.
Hopefully
that
will
pass
and
work
and
run
next
week.
So
we're
waiting
to
see
it's
a
relatively
small
amount
as
a
test,
and
if
that
works,
then
I
think
it's
close
to
my
head
to
keep
adding
more
liquidity.
F
I
think
we
will
be
able
to
at
least
test
the
interface
for
farming,
hopefully
next
week,
and
I
think
we
need
a
lot
of
testing
for
that
and
a
lot
of
testing
of
the
contract,
and
I
know
we
already
audited
but
like
if
we
just
click
around
try
it
out
see
if
it
makes
sense
of
how
we
did
it,
because
we
we're
kind
of
doing
something
new
here-
and
I
see
external
teams
struggling
with
this
due
to
yourself
farming
and
I
think
the
way
we're
doing
it
is
it's
pretty
it's
pretty
easy,
but
yeah.
A
F
I'll
probably
share
a
link
on
discord.
I'm
gonna
be
more
active
on
discord
and
I
know
we
talk
a
lot
on
key
base,
but
I
think
the
community
is
on
key
base.
So
you
I'll
try
to
be
more
active
on
on
discord
and
share
links,
but
when
I
share
it
doesn't
need
like
it
doesn't
mean
we
release
something.
So
the
test
links
are
are
not
like
live
versions.
So
just
something
to
think
about.
A
Yeah
yeah,
we
should
be
very
specific
and
careful
with
the
test
links
and
another
thing
that
we
should
mention
is
that
swapper
was
deployed
on
the
arbor
trump
test
net.
A
This
is
part
of
their
announcement
for
their
their
their
latest
test
net
release,
which
includes
actually
a
whole
set
of
d5
protocols
which
can
work
together.
So
that's
pretty
cool.
You
can
check
it
out.
I
think
things
are
maybe
a
little
bit
clunky.
These
are
the
things
that
something's
a
little
rough
around
the
edges
in
terms
of
arbitrary
but
they're,
gearing
up
for
their
first
main
net
release
in
march.
A
I
believe
it
will
be
controlled
by
admin
keys,
as
they
start
with
the
idea
that
those
could
be
burdened
if
things
go
as
well
and
yeah,
I
think,
what's
really
exciting
about
arbitrary
as
a
layer
2
is,
it
is
evm
compatible
and
will
be
open
to
any
project
to
deploy.
So
it
may
be
the
first
time
that
we
see
composability
on
a
layer
2
on
ethereum,
which
is
super.
A
You
know
a
bunch
of
us
here
are
working
to
make
sure
that
dxnow
is
part
of
that
and
involved
in
that
effort.
So
and
it's
an
optimistic,
roll-up,
so
kind
of
like
optimism.
The
main
difference,
I
think,
is
that
you
know
at
this
point.
The
test
net
for
arbitrary
is
actually
open
for
any
project
versus
with
optimism.
They
are
doing
some
exclusive
partnerships
with
their
test
then.
C
And
we
talk
about
it
all
the
time,
because
it's
like
a
you
know,
it's
a
fact
of
life
but
like
gas,
is
just
becoming
debilitating,
like
paralyzing,
whatever
the
word
is
so
we
could
see.
You
know
a
lot
of
activity,
and
I
was
just
looking,
I
think
loopering
is-
is
doing
around
10
million
dollars
a
day
in
volume
on
their
l2
there.
C
So
I
think,
that's
a
pretty
significant
amount,
and
so
I
think
there's
some
opportunity
for
for
swapper
in
that,
as
the
market
moves
pretty
quickly
towards
towards
needing
it.
A
Cool,
if
not,
if
rails,
is
the
other
product,
no
updates
there.
It's
the
development
efforts
on
that
have
been
de-prioritized,
because
there's
not
a
very
clear
way
that
deep
style
can
make
money
off
of
it.
It's
still
a
cool
product.
It's
still
the
external
product
might
be
something
in
the
future,
but
for
now
it's
kind
of
developments
on
pause,
and
then
I
think
that
brings
us
to
the
last
kind
of
governance
efforts.
A
There's
a
you
know,
a
few
things
going
on
development-wise
in
the
governance
front,
we've
been
iterating
on
monitoring
capacity
capabilities
the
past
couple
weeks
and
the
multi-call
scheme
has
been
installed,
which
is
a
really
big
deal,
that
kind
of
opens
up
connections
to
the
gnosis
protocol
relayer,
which
allows
the
excel
to
make
trades
from
the
treasury.
A
It
also
opens
up
connections
to
the
swapper
and
liquidity
relayer,
which
lets
the
excel
deposit
liquidity
in
the
swapper
and
last
but
not
least,
it
also
connects
the
x
down
to
the
bonding
curve,
so
so
yeah.
So
you
can
actually
see
test
proposals
for
both
the
doses
for
poverty,
layer
and
swapper.
Liquidity
relay
are
live
on,
alchemy,
now,
they're
kind
of
relatively
small
amounts
of
money,
like
I
mentioned
earlier,
just
to
test
and
see
that
things
are
working
well
and
if
those
go
well,
they
kind
of
open
up
it's
full
steam.
A
I
had
to
do
some
bigger
trades
and
bigger
liquidity
deposits
on
swapper.
There
is
not
yet
a
proposal
to
pause
the
bonding
curve
and
the
reason
for
that
I've
made
a
post
about
this
on
top
talk
is
at
the
moment,
alchemy
in
the
ui
is
not
exposing
functions
that
are
proxied
by
a
proxy
contract.
So
so,
basically
the
ui
is
working
just
fine
for
the
relayers,
because
those
are
not
proxy
contracts,
but
the
dxd
token
and
the
bonding
the
bonding
curve
itself
is
actually
using
the
proxy
pattern.
A
So,
right
now
in
the
ui,
all
you're
seeing
is
like
a
couple
of
the
admin
functions
for
the
proxy
contract
and
you're,
not
seeing
the
functions
that
it
can
actually
call
in
the
implementation
contract.
So
there's
an
issue
open
in
downstack
and
they
are
actually
working
on
making
that
update
to
the
ui
to
expose
the
api
application
binary
interface,
any
of
those
functions
from
the
implementation
contract.
Once
that
is
done,
then
the
proposal
to
make
the
pause
can
can
be
made
so
yeah
just
a
little
front.
End
technical
hiccup
on
content,
the
body
curve.
A
It's
setting
us
back
up
a
little
bit,
but
we're
still
still
on
on
track
here,
otherwise,
otherwise,
on
governance
stuff,
I
don't
know
augusto.
I
see
you're
here
anything
to
update
on
your
end.
I
Hello,
not
really
I'm
just
working
on
the
on
the
dxvote
application
and
the
extras
right
now,
I'm
trying
to
make
all
the
changes
that
we
receive
from
the
erc20
gear
audit
and
working
on
that
I'm
going
to
keep
you
guys
updated.
I
need
to
add
some
documentation
on
how
the
guild
works,
how
the
rc20
guild
works
already.
I
was
talking
with
chris
already
about
that,
because
yeah,
we
don't
have
any
documentation
on
explaining
how
it
works
and
it's
going
to
be
an
important
piece
on
our
governance
so
yeah.
A
I
We'll
talk
more
about
the
governance
call,
of
course
it
would
be
interesting
to
know
what
is
what
is
going
to
happen
on
the
bonding
curve
hunting,
because
we
need
to
make
some
changes
on.
I
mean
dallas
tech
need
to
make
some
changes
on
alchemy
right
regarding
the
ui
for
us
to
be
able
to
call
the
to
hold
the
cure
right.
If
not,
I
can
give
you
a
hand
and
encode
the
information
that
we
need
to
do
it.
A
A
Dxo
is
the
owner
of
the
contract
and
what
was
missing.
Is
this
plug-in
that,
like
lets,
you
do
proposals
to
actually
call
the
contracts
right,
so
I
mean
we
like
we
just
never.
I
mean
it.
This
whole
multi-cloud
effort
was
like
a
somewhat
serious
effort
to
get
installed
and
yeah.
I
mean
that
could
have
been
something
we
did
from
the
beginning,
but
there
were
other
things
that
we
were
working
on.
That
just
didn't
feel
like
a.
J
J
We
don't
know
how
much,
how
long
will
this
get
high
gas
fees
last
like
and
the
way
I
see
it
like
no
one
is
using
alchemy
like
like.
I
want
volume
proposal
if
it's
150
bucks
like
boosted,
it's
pretty
ridiculous.
A
Right
so
so
violet's
asking
if
we
could
use
dx
vote
on
on
next
day,
so
dx
vote
is,
is
based
on
the
dow
stack
core
contracts
with
you
know
some
difference
in
basically
peripheral
contracts
and
the
difference
in
the
ui,
and
so
I
think,
yes,
anything
basically
that
we
deploy
on
mainnet
can
be
deployed
on
xty,
including
the
current
governance
contracts
and
alchemy,
which
it
actually
has
been
cloned
to
2x.
A
So,
like
one
of
the
things
we'll
talk
about
this
more
too,
when
we
recap,
the
governance
call,
but
one
of
the
things
that
could
be
done
to
save
gas
is
to
use
leverage
our
x-type
base
so
to
speak.
Basically,
the
cloned
dao
on
next
night
to
do
some
of
the
work
of
proposals
and
things.
A
All
right
great
nylon
here:
do
you
want
to
recap
the
instead
of
calling
it
sure.
K
Yes,
so
we
had
a,
I
guess:
a
busy
is
their
fault.
This
week
we
had
there
were
no
introductions,
but
bogdan
basically
from
stator
presented
the
possibility
of
the
excel
partnership,
joseph
from
token
insight
came
and
shared
a
bit
more
info,
and
that
kind
of
I
think,
sparked
the
discussion
about.
I
guess
the
exile
in
china
in
general
venky
discussed
some
ideas
around
due
diligence
for
ideos
and
yeah,
perhaps
even
kind
of
like
a
like
a.
K
We
had
neyman
from
almanet
presenting
yeah,
basically
the
latest
in
collaboration
with
them,
and
I
think
that
yesterday
or
the
day
before,
he
actually
shared
like
the
proposals
that
he
will
do
and
I
think
that's
it.
A
Awesome,
maybe
we
can
describe
to
what
stator
is
it's?
It's
a
nft
platform,
caller
or
nft
leading
platform.
K
Yeah
lending
for
yeah,
basically
nfts.
A
Which
is
pretty
cool
so
in
other
words,
if
you
had
an
nfp
and
it
was
worth
something
you
could
get
a
loan
against
it
using
the
standard
platform.
That's
the
api.
L
Yeah
yeah
and
they're
interested
in
potentially
doing
an
ido,
even
maybe
using
mesa
version
one
and
if,
if
it
takes
longer,
potentially
makes
the
version
two.
A
Pretty
cool
any
thoughts,
questions
or
points
on
is
that
this
guy,
I
don't
know,
I
didn't,
read
it
yep
there
was
a
pan
bala
update.
Maybe
we
could
mention
that.
L
Oh,
there
was
a
so
pen
vala
community
overall
is
growing
like
the
the
panval
league
is
now
made
up
of
maybe
26
or
28
different
entities
participating
in
the
panvala
structure,
which
is
a
you
know.
It's
a
it's
a
it's.
A
inflation
matching,
that's
based
off
of
get
coin
grant
rounds
and
dx.
Dow
historically
did
dick's
deep
community
ddf
awards
the
the
latest
quarter.
We
still
have
yet
to
come
up
with
award
winners,
which
we
can
still.
L
If,
if
people
are
aware
of
important
projects
that
are
building
things
in
the
decentralized
d5
space
that
that
people
think
should
be
recognized
and
awarded
with
some
some
amount
of
money
that
was
taken
in
through
the
through
the
program,
and
so
as
part
of
that
there's
more
effort
by
panvala
in
general
to
spread
the
word
about
what's
happening,
and
so
there's
a
initiative
called
the
panvala
observer,
which
is
a
new
publication
that
his
that
is
spotlighting
different
members
of
the
penn
valley
league,
and
they
did
a
article.
L
A
recent
article
where
I
I
helped
explain
a
little
bit
about
what
dx
dao
is
doing
overall.
But
then
what
what
dx
dow's
involvement
in
pen
valla
is
and
and
the
goal
of
it,
and
so
that
was
written
and
that
you
can
see
that
in
the
pon
valla
channel
it
was
spread
it
on
key
base,
and
so
that
included
in
that
is
kind
of
a
call
to
the
greater
d5
community.
L
It
would
be
awesome
if,
like
the
the
greater
d5
community,
participated
in
this
program
that
that
dxdao
has
initiated
initiated,
but
it's
really
it
really
want.
The
idea
is
to
have
it
like
the
the
entire
defy
community,
awarding
the
important
projects
that
are
maybe
are
underfunded,
but
are
yet
really
important
in
the
d5
space
in
terms
of
decentralization
and
privacy
and
and
like
the
core
values
of
what
dx
dao
is
trying
to
achieve
so
yeah.
So
you
know
it'd,
be
you
know
anyone
that
is
interested
in
penval
and
wants
to
know
more
about
it.
L
They
reach
out
to
me
or
join
the
key
base
channel
and
also
any
projects
that
are
out
there.
That
you
think
deserve
recognition
that
are
that
are
not
well
recognized
and
and
should
maybe
want
some
funding,
and
that
could
lead
into
other
partnerships
and
things
with
the
executive
as
well
point
those
out
in
the
key
based
channel
or
the
forum.
A
Thanks
guy
yeah,
great
great
way
to
kind
of
show
recognition
and
help
support
different
efforts
in
the
deep
fight
community
that
might
be
underfunded
or
corporate
we're
in
need
of
their
condition.
So,
thanks
for
the
update,
if
we
move
to
governor,
it's
always
a
lot
to
talk
about
there,
you
should
call
those
over
just
you
can
kind
of
recapture.
C
This
yeah,
so
I
think,
let's
push
the
gas
discussion,
maybe
for
more
to
to
the
end.
We
can
kind
of
talk
about
ways
to
to
the
system
there,
because
I
think
worker
proposals
need
to.
We
need
to
think
a
lot
about
those
very
soon
and
and
and
not
you
know,
geek
style
spending
a
lot
of
money
on
mainnet,
and
that
is
overhead
that
we
need
to
have,
as
you
know,
an
organization,
but
we
need
to
figure
out
ways
to
to
do
that.
C
So
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
think
about
ways
this
week
and
maybe
talk
about
that
approach.
The
new
processes
process.
For
next
week
we
had
some
updates
to
contributor
guidelines
that
pulp's
been
working
on
some
small
changes
on
when
reposit
a
rep
is
issued
and
we're
gearing
up
for
an
ipfs
upload
and
then
we'll
actually
use
xdi,
maybe
to
ratify
those
and
then
most
of
the
call
was
spent
discussing
the
governance.
2.0
signal
proposal
thread.
C
That
is,
the
results
of
the
governance
2.0
working
group
over
the
last
couple
months,
and
so
just
a
brief
description
of
that.
There's
kind
of
three
components
of
governance:
2.0,
one
being
a
new
voting
power
equation,
two
being
good
governance,
incentives
and
three
being
the
migration
process
to
the
new
system.
C
So
the
voting
power
equation
is
the
most
important
component,
because
this
would
change
the
way
proposals
are
voted
on,
whereas
in
the
current
system
only
the
amount
of
rep
you
have
determines
whether
proposals
go
up
or
down
and
in
the
new
system
we
want
to
combine
rep
and
dxd
into
a
single
voting
power
to
determine
that
as
we
do,
that
by
creating
a
dxd
influence
and
a
rep
influence
based
upon
future
commitments
in
staking
dxd
and
then
the
rep
influences
is
based
upon
when
you
earned
your
rep
and
then
we
combine
them
into
a
single
voting
power
and
so
that
one,
I
think,
there's
agreement
on
the
overall
structure
of
that,
but
we
kind
of
be
leaning,
leaning
towards
moving
the
weights
of
the
dxd
influence
and
the
rep
influence
to
50
50
there.
C
So
I
think
that's
a
that's
a
good
structure
that
you
know.
I
I
think
it
sustainably
intertwines,
both
rep
and
dxd,
into
the
governance
system
and
then
a
lot
of
discussion
on
part
of
the
migration
process
to
the
new
system.
So,
right
now,
there's
like
you
know:
rep
holders,
reputation,
holders
control
the
treasury
control
all
of
the
hundred
k,
pre-mint
and
dxd
holders.
C
Don't
for
a
lot
of
the
dxd
holders,
don't
have
any
rep,
so
there's
a
way
of
trying
to
kind
of
swap
those
a
little
bit,
so
that
would
be
for
dhc
holders
by
having
rep
inflation,
that's
sent
to
dxd
holders
to
get
them
involved
in
the
the
governance
process
and
then
for
reputation
holders.
There's
discussion
on
how
to
out
on
whether
to
and
how
much
to
allocate
some
of
the
pre-mint
to
rep
holders
in
a
vested
contract.
C
So
I
think,
there's
still
discussion
going
on
there.
I
want
to
make
a
post
summarizing
the
the
discussion
from
yesterday
on
the
governance,
call
and
I'll
reply
on
the
thread
in
that
I
just
kind
of
forgot
to
mention
in
terms
of
the
voting
power
in
the
new
system.
C
One
of
the
key
components
is
that
you
need
both
rep
and
dxd
to
participate,
so
there's
kind
of
you
know
trying
to
meld
those
together,
so
there's
not
rep
holders
and
dxd
holders,
but
you
know
geeks
down
members
or
governors
that
are
participating
that
have
both
rep
and
dxd
and
and
so
yeah.
I
think
there'll
still
be
some
more
discussion
on
the
thread
there
and
hopefully
we
can.
C
We
can
move
to
a
signal
proposal,
but
of
course
this
is
a
signal
proposal
that
is
kind
of
outlining
the
the
general
structure
of
a
new
system,
but
there
is
still
a
long
ways
to
go
in
terms
of
actually
implementation
of
that.
Obviously
this
is
like
a
it
would
be
completely
new
system,
so
we'll
have
to
write
all
new
contracts
on
it
and
and
there's
still
some
details
to
be
to
be
ironed
out
in
the
implementation
phase.
C
But
the
goal
is
for
this
to
kind
of
set
most
of
the
parameters
now,
so
that
we
can
just
kind
of
execute
and
implement
that
in
the
future.
So
yeah
we'll
still
be
some
discussion
on
the
thread,
but
I
think
we're
moving
moving
moving.
There.
A
Guess,
if
not,
we
can
talk
about
there's
other
stuff
as
well.
Right
like
we
could
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
radical
proposal
that
is
up.
I
don't
know
if
I
think
geronimo
is
probably
most
closely
involved
in
that
if
he
wants
to
say
something
there.
B
Yeah,
so
radical
is
is
a
great
decentralized
competitor
against
github.
It's
not
ready
for
prime
time,
but
I
think
the
deal
style
can
be
part
of
the
decentralized
movement
by
actually
using
peer-to-peer,
enabled
decentralized
networks
like
radical.
A
B
That's
up
to
discussion,
how
how
this
will
play
out,
but
it
it
will
basically
mean
that
the
extra
will
create,
like
a
radical
organization,
very
similar,
to
get
to
a
github
organization,
and
this
will
allow
us
to
keep
a
list
of
repositories
which
are
connected
to
the
digstar
organization,
completely
unchained,
without
any
web
2.0
provider
required
for
like
identity
purpose
or
account
purpose
right,
and
we
will
kick
off
like
if
that
proposal
actually
ratifies.
B
We
will
kick
off
like
a
call
with
radical
next
week,
where
we
also
discuss
that,
like
part
of
the
cedar
program,
is
that
geek
star
will
also
get
like
a
token
allocation
which
will
allow
the
d
star
to
participate
in
the
radical
governance
to
make
sure
that
we
are
like
stewards
of
the
radical
network
and
yeah
can
govern
and,
at
the
same
time,
have
an
impact
by
actually
using
this
very
nice
tool.
For
us.
F
I
mean
we
always
waiting
or
we're
looking
for
these
solutions
to
go
away
from
web
2
and
centralization
and
another
thing
maybe
in
the
future,
is
to
actually
go
away
from.
We
want
to
put
up
our
documentation
on
for
geeksdale
and
its
products
and
even
technical
documentation.
F
F
B
Yeah,
but
the
idea
is
actually
like
not
far
away
like
radical
allows
us
to
have
like
a
peer-to-peer
code
based
sharing.
So
every
every
developer
on
oman,
for
example,
has
the
project
locally
on
their
computer
and
with
reticle.
It
just
like
enables
anyone
to
like
fetch
the
code
via
radical,
and
it
doesn't
like.
B
I
don't
know
gnosis.docs.ed
and
with
all
the
docs
hosted
on
reticle,
like
it's,
not
far-fetched,
but
it's
it's
great
to
like
start
using
docs
just
for
us
and
then
think
broader
about
like
how
to
how
we
can
help
decentralize
other
projects
with
it
right.
Yeah.
C
In
addition
to,
like
you
know,
this
is
promoting
decentralization.
If
it's
you
know,
with
our
products
stacked,
it's
also,
you
know,
maybe
a
business
opportunity
as
we're
kind
of
getting
it
here,
whether
it's
we're
building
a
product
that
others
will
use-
or
you
know
as
we're,
seeing
maybe
with
almond
and
even
radical,
how
it's
like
a
investment
opportunity
or
a
way
for
geek
style
to
support
and
support
projects
that
we're
aligned
with
and
also
maybe
participate
in.
Some
of
the
upside.
B
Yeah,
like
just
to
point
out
an
important
factor,
it's
kind
of
funny,
but
in
the
next
like
call
next
week
with
radical,
it
is
important
that
we
as
the
geeks
now
have
like
a
lot
of
people
joining
the
call,
because
they're
basically
distributing
the
tokens
per
person,
so
the
more
people
join
from
our
side,
the
better,
because
then
the
leaks,
then
we'll
get
more
tokens.
B
So
it
looks
like
the
good
like
a
good
amount
of
people
would
be
seven,
so
if
we
would
get
like
at
least
seven
people
joining,
they
call
preferable,
of
course,
people
who
really
want
to
use
reticle.
It
looks
like
those
like
this
is
mostly
def
related.
That
would
be
great
just
to
so.
First
like
we
get
the
allocation.
B
Second,
the
developers
actually
can
ask
questions
to
radical
and
see
where
we're
going
together
and
what
kind
of
deliverables
we
need
to
do
to
make
sure
radical
is
moving
forward
and
the
leak
starts.
Moving
forward.
F
L
I
think
you
mentioned,
like
everyone
using
the
dao's
address
when
like
if
the
tokens
are
in
the
dow,
like
we
don't
even
know
if
they
can
be
used
for
governance
like
it
may
be
too
difficult
at
this
point.
So
in
like
having
them
in
the
individuals,
I
don't
know
what
radicals
plan
is
but
having
them
in
the
individuals
accounts
that
allow
the
individuals
as
part
of
the
dx
style
community
participate
in
governance
of
radical
and
be
the
users
of
the
products
like
could
potentially
make
more
sense.
B
That's
a
good
question.
I
expect
that
they
didn't
thought
about
governance
right
now.
That's
my
gut
feeling,
but
that's
something.
That's
a
good
question
for
for
the
call
like
if
they,
if
they're,
giving
out
those
governance
tokens
and
they
probably
have
figured
out
how
to
use
those
tokens
right,
I
I
don't
expect
they.
They
use
snapshot.
So
I
I
expect
that
you,
they
use
on-chain
governance,
but
let's
see
like
I
would
say
we
we
should
still
go
with
the
d.
B
A
B
Those
are
very
important
partners,
not
only,
I
think,
mainly
for
us,
because
we
need
those
tools
and
of
course
they
they
they're
going
to
appreciate
that
we
are
working
with
them
together.
So
it's
same
with
almond,
like
those
teams
share
the
same
vision
and
personally
I
don't
think
there
are
a
lot
of
teams
who
share
our
vision.
So
we
need
to
work
closely
together
with
those
teams
who
want
to
push
decentralization
forward.
A
Absolutely
pretty
cool
yeah
other
governing
stuff.
Obviously
the
gas
is
has
been
a
hot
topic
with
the
how
expensive,
different
thoughts
and
people
thinking
about
how
to
optimize
our
gas
consumption
kind
of
like
our
the
overhead
for
dx.
Now
is
one
way
to
think
about
it,
since
it
reimburses
proposal
costs
for
the
large
part,
not
not
entirely,
there's
still
some
costs
incurred
by
the
boaters
themselves,
but
jake's
that
was
covering
we
got
the
majority
of
it,
and
so
it's
sort
of
like
this
overhead
cost
quick
update
like
the
we.
A
We
have
engaged
with
block
rocket,
which
is
a
dev
shop
out
of
the
uk
to
build
a
payroll
system
and
they've
actually
started
development
there
that
can
potentially
help
us
save
some
gas
costs
on
worker
proposals.
We've
talked
about
using
x,
died,
yeah,
so
stuff,
something
that
is
in
the
works
definitely
seems
more
urgent
with
300
way,
1600,
east
and
yep,
so
stay
tuned.
On
that
another
thing
that's
been
in
motion
on
the
governance
side
is
treasury
diversification.
A
The
there
was
an
authorization
proposal
that
passed
saying
that
geeks
now
should
move
three
million
dollars
worth
of
into
stable
coins
and
specifying
a
few
methods
on
how
that
can
happen.
It's
in
motion,
I
think,
there's
already
two
or
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
of
stable
coins
in
the
treasury
and
a
couple
more
proposals
to
keep
moving
there
and,
like
I
mentioned
earlier,
that
gnosis
protocol
relay
or
proposal.
If
that
test
works,
then
that
can
be
that's
one
of
the
methods
and
probably
the
preferred
method
in
the
long
run
is
objects.
A
Now
can
directly
make
trades
from
the
treasury
using
the
relayer,
it's
just
brand
new
and
so
getting
tested
out
there.
But
but
yes,
big
treasury
diversity.
Diversification
is
a
big
issue,
it's
in
motion
and
then
our
just
a
general
reminder
that
next
week
on
thursday,
you
know
we're
alternating
between
these
general
recaps,
with
resource
coordination
and
next
week
to
follow
on
from
the
roadmaps
we
saw
last
week
from
the
product
teams,
we're
going
to
be
talking
specifically
about
budgeting.
A
That
will
be
kind
of
the
first
and
primary
focus,
and
you
know
time
permitting
will
also
address
buyback,
txt,
buyback
and
treasury
management
in
general,
so
yeah
tune
in
next
week
same
time.
For
that.
A
A
B
Mvp
is
out,
it
has
been
tested
for
several
weeks
now.
It
was
buggy
to
say
the
least,
but
I
think
they
they're
very
focused
of
getting
rid
of
those
like
major
bugs
right,
but
it
is
possible.
B
They
have
actually
like
a
lot
of
improvements
going
on
specifically
for
mirror
mirroring
the
repositories.
So
it
looks
like
it's.
It's
actually
very
easy
already
to
make
sure
those
repositories
are
online
on
radical,
so
people
can
actually
browse
through
through
repositories
and
clone
them.
If,
if
they
want
to
so
it's
it's
out
there,
it's
usable
and
like
they,
I
mean
it's
so
alpha.
They,
they
don't
even
have
pull
requests
feature,
which
is
like
the
the
most
important
thing
you
need
to
have
in
code
code
collaboration.
B
Yes,
it
looks
like
they're
they're,
actually
already
working
on
it
and
in
a
couple
of
weeks
we
can
actually
test
it
out.
So,
in
my
view,
it's
a
long
process,
but
we
need
to
create
a
second
path
which
we
use
as
like
an
optional
path.
Until
we
see
that
github
is
not
the
right
place
like
github,
is
great
and
provides
us
a
lot
of
value.
B
But
at
some
point
we
need
to
contribute
to
make
sure
that
github
will
be
replaced
by
a
decentralized
network,
and
this
is
done
right
now,
like
it's
crazy.
Radical
is
actually
the
only
solution
right
now
and
the
beauty
is
they
actually
like
very
ethereum
fans,
so
all
they're,
like
governance
layer,
will
be
built
on
top
of
the
ethereum,
which
fits
perfectly
with
with
the
dxr
right
like
if
the
d
star
can
decide
who's
like
core
contributor
on
omen,
the
like
payroll
system
or
whatever,
that's
already
great
like.
B
A
As
developers,
I
think
we
forget
how
you
know
how
feature-rich
and
how
cool
github
actually
is
and
how
much
we
rely
on
it,
like
I
think
it's
as
a
company
github
has
been
around
for
I
think
over
a
decade
now
right
and
it's
it's
a
very
well-funded
project.
I
think
it's
a
long
time
before
something
like
radical
can
really
catch
up
to
github
from
like
a
user
perspective,
but
yeah.
I
think
the
right
way
to
think
about
it.
For
now
is
it's
like
it's.
It's
a
backup
right.
B
Right-
and
it's
also
like
what
we
always
need
to
consider
is
all
those
services
they
are
like
strong
attack
vectors,
the
the
bigger
the
dxo
gets,
the
the
the
bigger
the
attack
vector
gets
on
on
github
and
stuff,
like
that,
like
once,
we
have
like
this
sounds
crazy,
but
once
we
have
like
an
iranian
code,
contributors
github
could
like
remove
the
whole
repository
right
like
immediately,
and
we
don't
know
what
we
we
will
never
get
back.
The
repository.
B
K
There
you
have
on
key
base,
you
have
git
right,
like
we
could
back
all
of
the
repositories
to
the
keyways,
get.
A
That's
a
good
point,
and
also
worth
noting,
like
I
mean
git,
is
already
itself
really
distributed
right
because
you
run
it
locally.
So,
like
a
lot
of
these
projects
that
we're
working
on
are
actually
already
living
on,
you
know
half
a
dozen
people's
machines,
but
it
wouldn't
hurt.
To
I
mean
I
didn't
I've
never
looked
at
that
tab
on
key
base.
A
Get
itself
is
naturally
distributed.
Like
everybody
runs
it
locally,
it's
peer-to-peer,
so
you
could
even
operate
without
you
know,
but
just
we've
got
become
very
accustomed
to
the
basically.
The
project,
management
and
collaboration
features
that
github
has
like
doing
the
pull
requests.
The
commenting
you
know,
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
for
the
teams,
but
yeah
martin
points
out
that
github
is
overrated.
You
can't
even
export
or
import
tickets.
F
C
C
L
Yeah,
I
love
the
idea.
It
would
be
cool
to
have
urban
promo.
We
started
testing
our
bit
and
we
had
some
momentum
and
then
what
happened?
Is
it
not
ready.
B
It
is
ready,
but
then
like
we
work
with
kenny
from
from
herbert's,
and
they
gave
us
basically
control
of
an
account
which
wasn't
in
control
of
like
the
individuals.
So
no
one
had
the
private
key
to
the
account
and
then
you
don't
want
to
use
that
account
because
you're
not
in
control
right.
So
I
think
that
is
a
that
is
an
issue.
From
my
point
of
view.
I
don't
want
to
use
an
account
which
I
don't
have
the
private
key
of
so
yeah.
I
see
like
once.
B
I
have
more
time,
I'm
gonna
do
it
like
on
the
weekends
I'm
gonna
check
it
out
again.
It
looks
amazing
actually
like
seeing
the
progress
made
on
landscape,
which
is
the
the
front
end.
They
have
like
tons
of
improvements
and
it
gets
to
a
point
where
it
it
is
fast.
It
works
like
I
remember
two
months
ago,
it
was
slow
and
it
didn't
work,
but
it
looks
like
they
improved
a
lot
of
stuff.
B
B
Like
normal
people,
don't
need
to
know
what
stars
and
galaxies
are
people
who,
like,
I
hope,
with
with
their
hosting
there
will
be
like
a
one
click
button
where
they,
where
people
paid
like
25
bucks
per
year,
and
then
they
just
get
like
the
urban
experience
without
without
the
need
to
know
how
the
underlying
stack
works.
B
I
really
hope
urban
is
getting
used,
because
I
think
the
current
internet
is
actually
like
a
problem
and
we're
getting
all
those
like
company
controlled
buckets
where
we
fill
our
data
in
and
they
do
whatever
they
want,
with
the
buckets
full
of
precious
data
and
orbit,
allows
you
to
create
your
own
buckets
and
fillets
and
have
control
of
your
buckets.
C
A
C
Is
nuts
we're
kind
of
you
could
see
how
we
move
towards
a
direction?
How
like
products
and
services
become
more
usable
that
are
like
decentralized,
but
at
the
same
time
you
see
like
the
existing
system,
the
existing
world,
like
also
move
in
that
direction.
You
know,
regardless
of
what
you
kind
of
think
about
both
robinhood
and
the
the
twitter
and
trump
like
you
can
just
see
how
people
are
now
thinking
about
these
things,
a
lot
more,
and
I
I
I
just
you-
could
it's
the
trend.
That
is
just
it's
going
to
be
happening.
C
You
know,
regardless
of
of
what
we're
building
here,
and
I
think
it's
it's
it's
exciting
to
to
see
how
the
the
world
is
moving
in
that
direction.
Just
for
necessity,
people
people
realize
and
understand
the
importance
of
it.
F
I
I
think
there
there
will
be
a
wave
of
right
wingers
going
to
other
platforms
like
as
there
was
someone
predicted
that
trump
will
create
a
media
company
and
like
a
twitter,
a
competitor,
maybe
even
a
facebook
company,
but
not
not
in
the
same
sense
as
facebook
is
today,
but
just
like
he.
He
goes
into
war
again
against
like
twitter
for
for
doing
what
they
did
against
him
and
is.
F
C
C
D
We
don't
have
that,
but
maybe
we
fought
the
system
there.
I
mean.
I
think
people
need
to
do
a
deep
dive
into
the
dttc
and
how
these
trades
are
cleared
like
what's
actually
going
on
behind
the
scenes
right.
I
think
when
they
realize
how
arbitrary
it
is,
there's
a
strong
you
know
actually
compelling
case
for
d5.
A
C
D
Two
I
was
listening
to
what's
his
name
from
vlad
from
robin
hood.
He
was
getting
kind
of
an
on-the-spot
interview
from
elon
musk
on
an
app
called
clubhouse
and
basically
he
was
asked
being
asked
questions
about
why
they
had
to
put
up
this
collateral
and
he
wasn't
really
prepared
for
the
response
to
the
point
that
he
couldn't
even
explain
exactly
how
the
dtcc
even
made
their
decision
in
the
first
place.
A
People
you
know
g
plus
two
is
basically
like
time,
like
basically
two
days
for
things
to
settle
the
dtcc.
If
I
understand
it
right,
it's
like
basically
the
entity
behind
the
scenes,
at
least
in
the
united
states,
if
not
for
the
reaching
that
hand
like
basically
settles
trades
right
or
make
sure
that
trades
are
settled
like
cleared.