►
From YouTube: Ethereum Cat Herders Meeting #11 [2019/04/30]
Description
Agenda: https://github.com/ethereum-cat-herders/PM/issues/39
A
B
Sounds
good,
let
me
just
get
the
agenda
up
right
here,
great
okay,
so
the
first
item
on
the
agenda-
hopefully
I,
have
the
right
one.
This
is
meeting
11:00
where
April
30th.
So
yes,
first
up
the
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
update
on
the
prague
by
at
it.
So
hudson,
do
you
want
to
give
it
about
here.
C
B
C
C
Here
it
is
okay,
so
the
length
of
time
it
would
take
to
create
a
product
out
ASIC
that
has
been
taken
out.
That's
something
that
would
be
difficult
to
I
guess,
what's
it
called
to
estimate,
and
so
because
of
that
they
took
that
piece
out,
so
we're
not
gonna
be
able
to
get
that
information,
and
that's
just
something
where,
depending
on
who
you
talk
to
and
what
their
motives
are,
that's
kind
of
speculation
anyway.
So
I'm
not
really
too
concerned
that
that
piece
is
out
I'd
be
great.
C
If
we
have
that,
but
really
what
this
audit
is
gonna
be
checking
primarily,
is
the
security
of
the
etherium
network,
like
it'd,
be
kind
of
a
task
attack,
surface
and
known
methods
to
speed
up
the
calculation
of
the
hash
function,
and
things
like
that
so
and
then
identifying
any
advantages
or
disadvantages
the
product
how
it
presents
in
comparison
to
ET
hash.
It
says
so
it's
pretty
much.
If
you
go
to
the
blog
post,
we
released
on
it
and
you
click
on
the
proposal.
The
thing
that
was
taken
out
is
number
four.
C
That
with
me
as
well
yeah,
let
me
let
me
go
to
that
real
quick,
so
boris
has
kind
of
taken,
boris
and
daƱo
from
the
all
core.
Dems
meetings
have
kind
of
taken
point
on
this
right
now,
as
far
as
trying
to
come
up
with
a
schedule
for
the
hard
forks
as
of
right
now,
we
still
have
Istanbul
but
will
be
coming
up
in
August.
C
We
still
need
to
have
kind
of
some
cat,
herder
participation
that
we
haven't
had
in
that.
But
since
we've
been
focusing
on
the
Prague
how
odd
it
we
haven't
really
gone
that
far
into
that
yet,
but
there
are,
but
there
are
people
working
on
it.
They
just
aren't
necessarily
all
cat
herders,
which
is
okay,
I,
think
that's
about
it.
I
don't
know.
If
anyone
else
has
any
comments
on
that.
B
Yeah
I
guess
just
for
the
record
Dino
and
I
work
together
pretty
closely
and
I.
Think
one
of
like
the
he
was
at
the
Berlin
meeting
meetings
last
week
with
eath
one
point,
X
and
I
think
it
seemed
like
six
months.
Hard
Forks
were
pretty
consensus,
so
everyone
seemed
to
agree
to
that
I.
Think
Alexa
was
pushing
for
four
month
hard
Forks
and
the
biggest
objection
there
is
just
if
anything
goes
wrong
with
four
month
hard
Forks.
B
And
so
one
of
Daniels
proposals
was
like
should
probably
start
with
six
months.
And
if
we
get
good
at
six
months,
then
maybe
we
can
shorten
the
cycle
yeah
and
there's
a
there's.
A
fear
of
magician's
threat
about
this
weird
I
know
I'd
like
a
little
graph
showing
like
what
it
would
look
like
for
about
four
and
six
months.
I'll
try
to
link
it
in
the
resume
jet.
Okay.
A
A
A
From
the
last
meeting,
Argost
put
this
in
the
agenda
because
there
was
discussion
that
mark
wants
to
create
something
in
the
lockdown.
There
was
gonna,
be
some
discussion
after
the
last
meeting.
Just
with
regards
to
that
I
didn't
see
any
discussion
in
the
internal
cater
channel.
So
if
there's
nothing
further
safe,
we
could
probably
move
on.
D
A
D
Huija
started
working
on
the
action
item,
number
pagers,
the
emergency,
comms
kind
of
template
or
the
whole
process
of
setting
up
a
emergency
team,
getting
the
message
out
and
just
kind
of
putting
each
step
in
place,
and
she
submitted
a
document
and
I'm.
Actually,
a
River
I
was
actually
reviewing
it
currently
before
hopping
on
the
call,
and
it
should
be
there
for
other
people
to
review.
We
can
post
it
in
deep
telegram
or
Gator
channel
for
others
to
put
their
eyes
on
it
before
merging
it.
In.
E
D
A
D
D
I
mean
we
already
have
it
open
up
to
everyone
in
the
telegram
group
or
the
getter
channel,
but
if
we
would
like,
we
could
potentially
open
it
up
to
the
external
editors
community
to
try
and
come
up
with
some
PRS
to
fix
these
action
items
which
would
probably
allow
it
to
be
completed
a
lot
sooner
than
us
doing
that,
because
we
have
the
other
she's
more
for
higher
priority
issues
at
hand.
Right
now,
just
an
idea.
A
A
Agreed
it'll
be
open
up
to
the
water
community.
Do
we
want
to
pass
that
as
a
95
Twitter,
or
something
like
that?
We
can
talk
in
my
gaiter
channel
afterwards,
if
you
prefer.
D
D
F
B
F
D
D
So
the
spreadsheet,
with
all
the
stakeholders,
contact
information,
there's
no
real
necessity
to
have
that
open
to
anyone,
because
it's
mainly
for
kind
of
coordinating,
hard
fork
or
network
upgrades
rather
and
contacting
them
when
we
need
to
in
emergency
situations.
So
there's
no
need
to
have
available
at
all.
In
my
opinion,
god.
G
I
mean
he
said
it's
because
there's
an
issue
there
on
the
to-do
list
about
creating
a
contact
about
creating
a
contact
list,
though
we're
not
I,
think
what
you're
saying
Hugo
is
that
if
we're,
if
we're
opening
that
like,
are
we
opening
that
to
do
to
the
public?
So
is
there
a
way
to
make
that
only
invisible?
Privately,
yes,.
A
D
So
in
the
progress
without
we
there's
the
getter
channel
that
people
are
kind
of
discussing
on
the
progress
has
slowed
down
due
to
other
priorities.
But
we
were
I
was
speaking
with
Nina
who
and
her
partner
Alexander,
who
created,
play
theorem
gorg,
which
is
a
online
slid.
The
editor
and
it's
just
a
great
resource
and
they're
keen
to
help
out.
H
E
F
A
Think
I
think
for
the
time
being,
as
Elena
said,
exactly
exactly
Ron
I
mean
it's.
It
is
a
pretty
basic
website,
but
it
has
the
links
through
to
to
the
medium
into
the
Twitter
and
to
the
Gator
etc,
which
remains
useful.
Certainly
in
the
removal
of
the
upcoming
network.
Upgrade
is
a
must
and
if
we
could,
even
if
we
just
simply
points
through
to
a
theorem
wiki
where
they
currently
have
the
Istanbul
updates.
A
Just
let
people
could
see
that
because
at
the
moment,
I
think
anyone's
got
any
access
to
the
Istanbul
wiki
or
it's
not
really
as
well
publicized,
as
perhaps
we'd
like
it
to
be
so,
if
you
could
perhaps
have
a
link
to
that
instead
and
then
everything
been
by
and
large
that
active
date
stuff
is
removed
and
we
can
start
looking
at
trying
to
fix
and
and
put
better
improved
data
on
the
website.
Okay,.
F
F
A
F
E
D
Think
it
would
be
beneficial
if
we
put
a
kind
of
brainstorming
document
up
in
the
channel
to
discuss
what
we
would
like
to
be
included
in
terms
of
necessities
and
also
things
that
would
have
in
the
long
term
as
per
design
and
just
get
kind
of
some
rough
consensus
there
on
what
we
want
and
what
we
need
to
add
and
change,
etc.
Yeah.
E
A
Funding
for
certain
activities
so,
for
example,
lines
suggest
that
we
have
I
assume
CRO
account
for
the
cat
herders.
Currently
we
use
Hudson's
account,
which
is
great.
We
did
previously
have
access
to
lanes
account,
but
lands
account
is
currently
cancelled
and
so
now
we're
kind
of
beholding
to
Hudson,
which
is
great
as
long
as
Hudson
helps
us
out,
but
if
he
gets
cross
with
us,
then
we
kind
of
stuff.
H
A
We
might
be
with
him
in
one,
but
regardless
that's
a
discussion
office,
the
basic
a
set
up
when
he
proposed
this
in
the
funding
of
github
section
I
said
well.
Should
this
be
something
we
should
be
putting
towards
the
Aragon
Gow
boat?
And
he
said:
well,
it's
not
a
hell
of
a
lot
of
money.
Should
we
have
a
threshold
before
we
go
to
an
era
Khandala
it.
B
Feel
like,
if
that's
the
case
then
maybe
I
would
go
just
like
a
little
bit
lower
than
500
to
start
give
in,
like
you
know,
if
what
we
need
for
an
average
average
expenses,
50
bucks,
then
maybe
I,
don't
know
like
250
there's
still
five
times
bigger
than
that,
and
if
we
trust
that
two
people
can
do
that.
That
seems
fine,
but
it's
not
a
very
strongly
held
opinion.
So.
A
A
A
Resume
Pro
is
just
basically
allows
us
to
have
meetings
outside
of
this
meeting,
which
is
currently
using
Hudson's
account
by
Ford.
If
we
were
to
have
any
other
meetings,
such
as
discussions
around
hard
folks
or
aetherium,
or
the
work
being
done
in
Constantinople
and
so
on,
we've
got
a
spare
account
that
any
one
of
the
cat
herders
are
able
to
use
and
set
up
meetings
there
about
not
having
to
rely
on
someone
or
cuts
in
to
provide
yeah.
C
B
C
Think
if
we
do,
we
should
do
the
the
monthly
plan
instead
of
the
yearly
plan.
Probably
I
mean,
depending
on
how
much
money
it
saves
us
to
do
the
yearly
plan,
because
we
might
end
up
in
like
three
months
or
six
months
with
someone
else
getting
a
pro
plan
that
can
be
used
and
shared
from
their
org.
And
then
we
can
use
that
one.
Instead,
good.
A
A
C
And
the
other
thing
is:
when
we
set
it
up,
we
can
just
share
the
password
amongst
a
few
of
us
I
think
so
any
like
any
of
two
or
three
people
can
log
into
the
same
single
account
and
set
up
meetings,
because
it's
a
per
user
fee
I,
don't
know
how
many
users
come
with
a
single
Pro
account.
It's
either
one
or
three
I
forgot,
but
if
it's
one
single
user,
then
we'll
just
share
the
password
amongst
us.
Yes,.
A
Yeah,
just
a
quick
one
on
that
managed,
you
were
seen
in
the
Gator
chats
I
managed
to
have
a
chat
with
Danny
Ryan
from
ethereum
to
Quinn's
era.
We're
gonna
be
having
a
meeting
tomorrow
at
2:00
p.m.
UTC
just
to
have
a
general
catch
up
with
regards
to
what
the
parent
people
in
Sarah
is
doing
and
where
potentially
the
Theron
cat
herders
can
help
a
34-0
moved
forward.
A
B
C
C
C
Oh
no
that'd
be
okay,
I.
Think,
there's
a
way
from
there
that
you
can
buy
I
think
it's
called
Google
G
suite
and
it's
something
around
five
dollars
or
seven
dollars
a
month
and
you
get
an
email
address
associated
with
your
domain.
There
might
be
a
free
way
to
do
it
too.
Through
GoDaddy.
We
should
explore
that
I.
C
C
B
I
had
a
quick
update
on
like
the
whole
governance
process
stuff,
so
I've
been
slowly
chipping
away
at
EEP
one
and
trying
to
make
the
non-technical
parts
of
the
each
process.
More
explicit.