►
From YouTube: Ethereum Cat Herders Meeting #32 [2020/04/28]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
B
Actually,
this
is
the
thing
it
wasn't
there
earlier,
since
that
meta
thing
was
getting
I
mean
it
needs
certain
reviews
and
it
has
to
undergo
process.
So
I
thought
that
if
we
should
be
keeping
this
particular
section
over
here
would
be
having
a
nun
place
to
reach
out
to
know
which
one
the
right
thing
I
mean
right,
EAP
is
getting
into
it.
So
that
was
just
my
idea.
I
wanted
to
throw
that.
This
is
what
we
are
trying
to
do
this
time.
Is
it
appropriate,
acceptable,
I,.
A
C
B
More
thing
I
wanted
to
add
here
is
about
the
status
of
the
EF
is
like
I
know.
Many
of
those
are
interesting.
Many
of
those
are
still
into
rocks
and
everything
else
so
EFI
is
ideally
supposed
to
capture
that
thing,
but
we
understand
that
there
are
also
some
nuts
there.
So
if
it
is
appropriate,
I
can
come
up
with
a
table
here
for
mentioning
which
AIP
is
under
what
stage
that
we
can
do
after
every
all,
quorum
call.
A
B
You
know
like
in
the
previous
call
vient
America
saying
that
they
should
be
having
some
kind
of
informational
going
outfit
become
an
ad
based
on
the
EIP
is
like
in
a
less
technical
way,
or
maybe,
if
it
is
a
highly
technical
VIP
just
we
should
point
them
to
the
right
place
to
read
more
about
it.
So
kind
of
you
know,
resources
making
a
relevant
for
the
community.
B
B
C
I
think
we
should
prompt,
you
is
try
and
aggregate.
You
know
when
there's
media
articles
and
whatnot
about
try
to
bundle
them
and
share
them,
and
when
there's
not
I
guess
we
can
link
the
eep
and
then
once
we
get
closer
to
the
upgrade,
we
can
write
like
a
little
paragraph
like
we
like.
We
always
do
for
the
upgrades
but
like
in
the
meantime,
as
people
kind
of
probe
on
versus
the
understand
that
eats
better.
We
should
try
and
link
them.
A
A
B
D
No
coldest
meeting,
but
it
is
too
detailed
and
like
people
who
are
not
technically
more
technically
following
the
all
the
developments
in
ethereum
community,
it's
hard
to
catch
up
for
them.
So
that's
why
this
idea,
where
we
can
you
know,
only
point
out
the
action
items
and
decisions
of
every
meeting
and
do
a
short
part
about
this,
like
the
summary
of
the
meeting
and
just
ship
it
through
a
subset
mail
so
that
we
can
have
you
know
a
proper
building
of
community
like
this
is
essentially
community
outreach
by
easy.
A
E
F
F
D
Morning
is
like
one
is:
full
strategies
like
you
know,
for
forums
and
tweets
by
the
people
who
feel
that
it
is
valuable
like
re,
CH,
community
and
people
other
people
around
it,
and
then
the
post
strategy
is,
of
course
the
community
outreach.
So
I
just
have
you
know
like
I
know
a
lot
of
people
around
so
I
can
just
push
it
in
to
you
know
just
telegram
groups
and
we
can
do
a
reddit.
G
D
G
D
D
Subject
actually
has
this
thing
where,
if
your
subscriber
is
feed,
then,
like
we
get
a
certain
payment,
but
since
I
don't
have
experience
of
that,
but
what
I
can
do
is
I.
Can
you
know,
coordinate
with
pooja
on
this,
so
that
whatever
follows
upon
this?
Like
you
know,
we
can
plan
out
things
about
the
payment
and
stuff
like
I.
Am
not
I'm,
not
really
asking
for
payment
right
now.
Let
me
just.
D
D
B
A
H
No
major
updates,
since
the
previous
meeting
we
got
our
first
Curley
community
update
like
a
response
from
someone.
Most
of
them
I've
been
from
AIP
editor's,
the
EPI
authors
and
core
developers.
I
wrote
up
a
quick
medium
article.
The
current
results
which
go
out
in
the
next
Monday,
okay,
be
on
the
lookout
for
that
next
Monday.
B
Put
a
blog
out
giving
the
initial
introduction
of
what
EAP,
IP
and
I
try
to
put
that
survey
in
there
again
so
that
people
might
respond
if
they
have
not
responded
it
so
far,
so
yeah,
that's
the
plan,
we
would
be
doing
it
in
two
parts.
One
part
is
out
already.
Another
part
will
be
coming
up
on
next
Monday.
A
B
So
that
list
that
we
have
shared
earlier,
that
has
like
six
to
seven
projects
on
Friday.
They
came
back
with
some
time.
Lesion
limitation,
the
duration
limitation
goes
for
sixty
minutes
only.
We
have
to
make
some
adjustments
over
there,
and
now
they
have
kind
of
agreed
yesterday
that
they
would
give
us
more
time.
So
we
are
working
on
which
presentation
should
go
for
how
much
duration
this
one
part
and
the
second
and
important
was
about
the
selection
of
logo
that
we
should
provide
for
their.
B
You
know,
advertisement
on
and
on
their
website,
so
the
discussion
was
about
the
which
logo
should
go.
Should
it
be
in
theory
amore?
Should
it
be
the
cat
who's
got.
Cat
herders
are
in
trying
to
include
all
the
projects
also
from
the
Athena
ecosystem,
and
if
it
goes
for
a
theorem
foundation,
there
would
be
some
issues,
mini
girls
issues
and
a
theorem.
So
what
is
the
general
cart
over
here?
I.
A
Think
how
we
have
it
right
now,
basically
planning
for
whatever
happens,
is
kind
of
the
best
strategy.
Wouldn't
what
I
mean
by
that
is
having
the
multiple,
like
the
seven
I
think
he
said,
seven
teams
was
the
original
layout
yeah
and
now
there's
much
less
because
of
the
time
restriction
that
one
of
them
gave.
So,
let's
just
be
ready
for
them
to
flip-flop.
If
that
happens
and
yeah
beyond
that,
what
was
the
other
question?
I
missed?
It.
B
Yeah
they
said
that
earlier
it
was
three
hours
when
it
was
like
a
physical
event.
Then
they
turned
out
to
be
the
virtual
one.
Then
they
said
one
to
three
hours
now
yesterday
they
communicated
that
it
could
be
a
two
hours.
So
we
are
planning
to
take
one
hour
40
minutes
over
there,
and
the
distribution
has
to
be
done,
like
the
termination
tradition
right.
B
F
A
The
etherium
cat
herders
funding
through
the
ecosystem
support
program
and
Maalik
dal.
We
have
another
meeting
today
with
the
ESP
team,
which
is
a
follow
up
meeting
from
our
original
meeting.
We've
sent
them
further
documentation
to
let
them
know
what
our
q1
are
really
are.
Q1
to
q2
plans
are
for
the
cat
herders,
what
we've
accomplished
so
far,
things
of
that
nature,
we'll
probably
reuse
part
of
those
documents
to
also
apply
for
a
Maalik,
do
grant
and
that's
the
current
status.
B
B
Danny
again,
but
I
understand
that
he
may
not
be
you
know
available
for
putting
out
the
bounty
there.
So
I
have
sent
a
request
that
we
would
be
doing
that
on
our
end.
But
my
question
here,
but
everybody
is
like
I,
wanted
to
check
like
this-
has
been
due
since
January
and
like
people
have
not
received.
Is
it
something
that
the
catalyst
fund
should
consider
and
pay
out
those
people
or.
B
That's
the
question:
I
have
been
asking
to
Danny
again
like.
Is
it
something
that
they
have
fund
for
that
and
if
they
do,
could
you
be
like
kind
enough
to
transfer
it
to
our
so
that
we
can
manage
the
problem?
Is
management
partying?
So
we
do
not
have
any
clear
indication
from
them
so
far
that
if
they
have
fun
for
this
or
not,
but
considering
that,
if
they
may
not
have
fund
for
this,
we
are
applying
funding
from
the
monarch
and
the
ESP
is
well
liked
in
this
new
proposal.
B
A
B
D
Just
have
one
question
like
excuse
me
from
a
lot
of
bounds,
but
I
just
know
that
Scot
move
from
get
going
was
putting
on
the
Bounty's
fire
two
nodes
right
so
like
does
he
have
any
action
item
in
this
because
I
am
having
a
meeting
with
Scott
like
three
hours
later
today.
So
I
can
ask
him
about
this.
So.
B
Scott
said
that
he
could
not
give
any
bounty
because
he
has
not
received
any
request
from
the
h2
team.
He
is
not
getting
any
requests
from
Danny
side,
so
I
understand
that
there
can
be
a
shortage
of
bandwidth
with
their
two
team
and
that's
where
we
said
that
flat
order
can
help
you
out
putting
out
those
bounty
and
then
Scott
can
fulfill
that.
So
we
are
just
one
answer
from
their
part.
What
role
they
would
want
us
to
play
in
there?
You.
A
Know
what
would
be
good,
though
sasha-ann,
if
you,
when
you
talk
to
him
I,
don't
think
it
would
be
out
of
line
at
all
to
ask
hey
for
the
etherium
2.0
note-taking.
Has
there
been
a
trench
of
money
already
given
to
you
to
support
that
note-taking?
So
you
can
see
if
Scott,
Moore
and
get
coin
have
the
money
or,
if
Danny's,
giving
it
every
time,
because
my
guess
would
be
that
Scott
and
get
coin.
Have
the
money
already.
A
B
D
A
F
Yes,
that
one's
me,
let
me
just
throw
the
link
into
chat
the
etherium
Stack
Exchange.
Just
has
this
like
little
thing
where
you
can
put
in
like
a
banner
that
will
get
displayed
instead
of
an
ad
on
the
etherium
Stack
Exchange,
so
I
thought
it
might
be
just
a
cute
place
to
just
try
and
drive
some
awareness
and
try
and
get
our
banner
there.
The
details
are
there
in
the
in
the
link
for
what
it
would
need.
F
F
B
H
H
B
Yeah
I,
like
a
number
11
but
I,
requested
him
to
add
some
logos
as
well,
so
I
think
it
is
out
again
there,
so
we
might
want
to
vote
it
and
bye-bye
before
I
mean
like
by
the
end
of
this
week
or
maybe
by
Monday.
We
could
come
up
with
something
so
that
William
and
Edison
can
sync
up
and
place
a
nod.
What
do
you
guys
think
I.
F
E
A
But
that
and
greg
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong.
The
understanding
now
is
that
there
were
mistakes
about
it
going
into
a
into
a
next
hard
fork
that
was
written
down
in
notes,
eighty-one
and
seventy
seven,
and
so
those
are
being
corrected
through
a
poll
request.
But
because
of
that,
there's
now
not
a
clear
decision
on
moving
forward
with
prague,
pal
and
so
that
needs
to
be
fixed
and
so
greg.
Do
you
want
to
just
continue
with
the
rest
of
your
ask,
and
did
I
miss
NS
anything
there?
Well,.
G
Yeah,
it
was
quite
a
quite
a
mess
there,
because
the
the
decision,
as
noted,
was
quite
clear
and
those
notes
that
form
of
notes
goes
back
quite
away.
I
think
anyone
coming
into
the
PM
directory
would
see.
Oh
here's,
a
video,
I
don't
have
an
hour
or
two
listen
to
it.
Here's
some
notes,
they're,
clearly
rough,
here's,
a
summary
decisions,
ten
point,
something
that
looks
pretty
official
and
I
took
it
that
way
as
well.
I
was
present
on
the
call.
I
read
the
notes
to
me:
it
looked
clear:
we
wanted
to
go
forward.
G
There
was
some
pushback
on
the
date
and
some
notion.
Well,
we
can
resolve
the
date
later,
but
we
want
to
go
for.
There
was
a
successive
meeting
a
mean
came
on.
He
insulted
everybody.
There
was
some
chatter
afterwards,
some
proposals,
but
I
never
took
at
that
initial
decision
to
go
forward
had
changed.
Other
people,
including
vitalik,
took
that
chatter.
G
Afterwards,
as
we
had
decided
to
do
things,
so
that's
on
the
core
devs
to
clean
up
what
we're
doing
and
make
sure
when
we
published
a
decision,
it's
a
published
decision
as
as
far
as
prog
pal,
the
community
I,
don't
think,
has
any
clear
notion
of
what's
going
on
some
people
think
we've
decided
not
to
do
it.
Some
people
think
we
have
decided
to
do
it.
G
G
So
it's
it
needs
to
be
resolved
and
the
people
working
on
it
are
just
wearing
out,
and
so
it's
time
to
resolve
this
and
I'm
asking
for
help
and
help
in
getting
this
resolution,
which
means
help
in
in
surfacing
the
concerns
of
the
community
in
a
way
that
that
people
can
feel
that
their
concerns
have
been
legitimately
surfaced.
I'm,
not
as
I've
said
that
interested
in
votes
or
signals.
It's
it's
an
amorphous
community.
We
don't
have
a
governance
structure
to
say
that
about
is
legitimate
and
the
cord
as
votes
don't
mean
a
lot.
G
You
know
we
need.
We
need
arguments
that
we
can,
that
we
can
actually
judge
and
ours.
Our
responsibility
is
to
secure
the
network
and
I
really
think
from
what
I've
seen
on
Twitter
that
a
lot
of
people
do
not
understand
the
proc.
Do
W
is
about.
Do
we
want
a6
to
take
over
the
network
and
do
not
understand
that
if
we
do
not
put
in
prog
bo
w
soon,
Asics
will
take
over
the
network.
G
So,
on
Twitter
and
elsewhere,
I
see
scattered
debate,
strong
opinions,
very
little
actual
argument
supporting
opinions,
you
can't
argue
very
much
140
characters
and
I,
don't
know
if
the
cat
herders
can
help
with
I,
don't
know
just
going
through
medium
posts,
important
Twitter
posts
pulling
that
together
to
say
you
know
here
or
what
appear
to
be.
The
major
camps
as
Brant
describes
them
and
what
one
of
the
major
arguments
seem
to
be.
G
You
know
pulling
that
together
making
getting
some
announcements
out
this
week.
The
topic
will
come
up
just
just
as
far
as
the
champions
announcing
what
the
current
state
of
development
is
and
I'll
be,
asking
the
core
devs
to
set
a
date
approximately
a
month
in
the
future
at
which
we'll
try
to
make
a
No
No
Go
decision
on
you
know
putting
it
into
a
hard
fork
so
giving
the
community
you
know
a
month
or
so
to
have
a
final.
G
A
F
Ahead,
William
yeah
I
definitely
understand
everything
that
you're
saying
the
way
I
see
it.
I'm
really
offering
this
as
a
personal
opinion.
I
would
be
interested
in
other
people's
feedback
is
I'm
not
really
entirely
sure
how
possible
it
is
and
I'll
even
try
to
explain
why
the
nature
of
the
way
I
see
it,
which
is
always
a
very
difficult
thing
to
know
at
the
end
of
the
day.
F
After
that,
you
have
vocal
members
of
the
social
media
communities
just
for
right
now,
I
don't
mean
this
as
a
political
statement,
I'm,
probably
gonna,
try
and
focus
on
the
opposition
to
Prague
pal,
no
matter
what
happens,
there
will
be
members
of
that
group
who
will
see
themselves
as
not
having
been
listened
to
if
Prague
pal
is
implemented
and
being
that
they
can
be
vocal
and
that
they
have
people
who
listen
to
them.
They
will
almost
certainly
drag
a
constituency
of
people
with
them.
F
F
As
a
result,
I
mean
we've.
We've
trolled
these
waters
before
we've
tried
to
get
onto
social
media,
we've
tried
to
get
people's
opinions.
We've
tried
to
use
various
resources,
such
as
either
canonize
or
yellow,
to
try
and
educate
people
about
what
the
different
sides
of
the
argument
are.
But
I
don't
think
it'll
change
that
when
people
are
looking
to
establish
their
own
opinion
about
it,
some
of
the
people
they're
going
to
look
to
will
probably
necessarily
say
that
they
have
not
been
listened
to.
F
F
I
I
G
Yeah
I
found
that
call
very
inconclusive,
partly
because
I
mean
mostly
insulted
us
that
I,
don't
think
I'm
the
only
core,
dev
fact
I
know
I'm,
not
the
only
core
deaf
who
felt
he
simply
showed
up
called
us.
Incompetent
I
tried
to
make
statements.
He
simply
interrupted
me.
It
ya
know
I
wouldn't
take
any
conclusion
from
that
call
and
it
didn't
really
come
up
again.
Yeah.
A
G
A
And
listen
to
the
call
near
the
end
of
the
call
he
says
at
this
point:
10:57
as
it
stands
today
is
not
something
that's
viable
to
go
in,
so
I
want
to
make
a
better
EIP
that
addresses
the
proliferation
of
a
six
on
the
network,
but
in
a
way
that
would
be
better
served
than
prog
cow
and
without
the
baggage.
So
that's
that's
kind
of
there
since
the
champion
even
said
it
shouldn't
go
in.
That's
where
I
came
to
that
conclusion
from
yeah
I
think.
I
That's
that's
actually,
a
great
path
forward,
like
I,
feel
like
on
the
call
like
yes,
I,
mean,
was
kind
of
a
jerk,
but
aside
from
that,
there
was
like
some
openness
by
people.
You
know
maybe
move
something
like
this
forward,
but
it
would
have
to
take
a
different
form.
I
agree
that
you
have
to
just
you
know,
just
change
the
name
change
the
EIP
number.
They
kind
of
have
a
fresh
start.
I
Try
to
consult
people
like
I
mean
Martin
from
gnosis,
seems
pretty
reasonable
on
this
stuff
Ben,
who
was
on
the
call
as
well,
seemed
pretty
reasonable,
try
and
consult
with
those
people
get
their
feedback
early
on
and
and
and
see.
If
you
can
come
up
with
a
proposal
that
kind
of
satisfies
them,
I
feel
that
has
a
much
higher
likelihood
of
making
it
on
meyneth
than
profile.
Today,.
G
Danton
french-kiss
goes
now
a
champion
bits
be
tripping
and
I.
Michael
Carver
had
a
discussion
afterwards.
He
should
be
a
champion.
He's
just
saw
her
falling
off
the
he's
fallen
off
the
discussion.
For
a
moment.
Everybody
was
scrambling
just
to
find
a
place
to
shelter
from
the
virus.
You
know,
I
mean
only
recently,
as
everyone
got
in
okay
Ben
was
sitting
in
his
apartment,
watching
hearses
roll
out
of
town,
because
the
cemetery
at
his
home
town
had
filled
up
so
we're
getting
back
to
that.
Michael,
Carter
and
I
discussed
it
and
said
yes
changing.
G
G
Christy
has
work
that
we're
getting
ready
to
publish
analyzing
nonces
on
the
network
to
say
yes,
we
had
a
3's
operating
some
evidence
today,
tens
are
operating,
so
that's
things.
People
need
to
be
aware
of
so
the
feeling
that
is
more
than
feeling
that
the
analysis
of
all
three
of
us
is
that
a
solid
ten,
fifty
seven
and
a
solid
discussion
of
it
is
what
needed
to
happen.
The
information
has
just
not
been
presented
there
so.
G
G
F
G
Revision
we
got
into
is
pretty
much
a
bit
more
explanation
in
the
motivation.
We
can
add
a
section,
although
really
there's
a
whole
separate
paper
to
refer
to
as
to
analysis
of.
What's
currently
on
the
network
and
Michael
has
a
table.
He's
worked
out
basically
of
clients
that
are
ready
to
keep
track
of.
G
Essentially,
all
the
mining
pools
are
were
on
board
with
the
version
just
before
the
kick
fix.
All
of
the
exchanges
were
ready
to
go
with
the
verse
and
just
before
the
kick
fix
so
essentially
getting
the
proposal
cleaned
up.
That
a
point
of
look
this
is
done
is
tested
everyone's
ready
to
go
with
it.
So
do
we
go
with
it
or
do
we
say?
No,
then
somebody
not
me
probably
not
been,
probably
not
Michael
can
decide.
Let's
find
another
way
to
stop
Asics
or
let's
decide
that
now
we
will
let
the
basics
take
over.
A
F
F
And
not
just
I
think
there's
a
counterbalance
also,
which
is
that,
if,
if
it
does
give
you
a
PR
game,
if
anything,
I
I
think
the
shortcut
might
not
be
shorter,
I
mean,
but
here
I'm
thinking
that
a
bit
out
of
context
I
mean
to
say
that
if
you
want
to
stay
at
10:57
to
save
time,
I'm
not
sure
that
you'll
save
time
in
the
long
run.
If
people
perceive
that
as
10:57
getting
sort
of
bulldozed
in
I,
don't.
G
A
G
B
Up
on
that,
I
was
thinking
like
if
it
is
appropriate
to
curate
all
these
things,
like
it
one
place,
maybe
on
the
EC
H
websites
to
lists
of
what
all
documents
and
things
that
we
have
done
so
far.
You
know
so
I'm
going
to
just
share
this
link.
I
have
already
curated
it,
but
I
have
not
put
it
on
the
website
E.
Yet
this
actually
lists
all
the
discussions
that
has
been
going
on
in
the
etherium
magician
and
there
is
also
a
thread
initially
opened
by
the
cat
hurdles.
B
So
you
know
kind
of
discuss
about
the
proc,
fine,
that
and
all
those
things.
So
if
it
will
be
helpful,
we
have
willing
to
do
that.
That
would
be
a
platform
to
get
to
know
about
what
has
been
there
and
what
what
is
pros
and
cons,
but
it
certainly
cannot
be
a
voting
platform
just
the
informational
piece
we
would
be
providing
there
I.
F
G
B
Yes,
so
actually
that
is
that
thread
that
was
initially
created
by
catalyst
only
to
discuss
this
proper
thing.
I
just
have
shared
a
link
in
the
chat.
So
if
we
would
want
to
continue
the
discussion,
we
can
kind
of
promote
the
start
and
people
can
come
join
us
together
here
again,
mm-hmm
discussion,
yeah.
A
We're
happy
to
promote
that
material.
What
I
don't
want
to
happen
is
I.
Don't
want
there
to
be
conflation
between
the
etherium
cat
herders
in
either
side
of
the
issue
and
we're
already
dangerously
close
to
that
by
bringing
this
up
again
at
all,
because
that
puts
us
in
a
position
to
imply
that
we're
taking
the
position
that
prog
pal
has
not
been
decided.
A
G
G
G
A
G
Into
Berlin,
as
far
as
as
the
fear
just
expressed
a
curation
of
things,
you
know
plus
getting
it
out
there
that
you
know
Friday
at
this
point,
just
listen
in
if
you're
interested
the
champions
will
be
presenting
current
status
and
I'll
be
asking.
The
court
has
to
set
a
future
day
to
to
make
a
decision.
That
is
a
decision,
and
we've
talked
about
Hudson
and
puja
clean
cleaning
up
the
process
so
that
when
we
list
a
decision
it
can
be
taken
as
such.
Well.
A
I
G
A
G
A
I
want
to
go
over
what
what
the
asks
are
and
that
we
we
are
agreeing
to
put
two
as
much
as
we
are
able
to
before
Friday
put
out
different
resources
and
advertise
those
resources
for
people
to
look
at
the
pros
and
cons
of
prog
pal
as
neutral
as
we
can
be
about.
That
is
that
is
that
the
big
ask
here
that
are
the
main
ask
I,
should
say,
or
was
there
something
else
complimentary,
yeah.
G
A
A
That's
that's
absolutely
true,
and
that's
and
there's
a
lot
of
controversy
on
whether
I
should
have
done
that
or
not
like
yeah.
So
then
that's
that's.
Why
I'm
at
the
pros
and
cons
section
like
that
was
the
one
that
I
feel
like
can
be
extrapolated
and
to
something
more
important.
If
it's
accurate
and
that's
another
thing,
people
didn't
even
it
was
so
boring
people
didn't
even
comment
on
that
part.
A
G
G
B
F
If
I
could
just
backtrack
to
one
point,
which
is,
it
could
be
I
interpreted
you
wrong.
If
so,
please
do
let
me
know,
but
I
believe
that
part
of
the
ask
also
was
to
try
and
create
a
forum
in
which
both
sides
could
feel
that
the
other
side
heard
them
so
I
do
sort
of
want
to
reiterate
what
I
said
before,
which
is
I.
Don't
think
that
we're
capable
of
doing
that
we
can
get
the
information
out
there.
We
can
try
and
help
people
understand
the
sides,
but
I
don't.
G
I
I'd
love
to
see
the
magician
even
the
thread
on
the
magician
forum
for
the
EIP,
many
people,
I'm,
not
sure
I've,
actually
read
the
EIP.
They
certainly
don't
seem
to
engage
with
the
arguments
there
and
even
just
starting,
even
just
pointing
there
and
say,
please,
you
know,
make
your
arguments
there
put
a
link
to
your
medium
essay
to
your
blog
anything
that
the
core
devs
cannot
spend
all
day,
trying
to
synthesize
what
happens
on
Twitter
or
reddit
or
other
places
and
yeah,
and
pulling
together
pulling
together
arguments
pulling
together.
B
Resources
by
maybe
in
another
24
hours,
it
would
be
up
on
the
East
Asia
website
and
we
can
share
the
information
on
we,
our
Twitter
as
well,
that
is
a
kind
of
curation.
Both
sides
of
people
are
welcome
to
view
it
and
share
their
thoughts
on
the
appropriate
platform,
because
that
also
links
to
the
acquisition
forum,
where
discussion
is
already
ongoing
right.
Yes,.
A
Right
great
happy,
we
can
help
Greg
and
with
that
we
have
about
a
minute
left
the
oh.
The
thing
that
I
did
want
to
go
over
I
took
all
of
the
SIA
and
converted
it
to
dye,
and
we
talked
about
that
in
the
private
channel.
We
lost
about
a
hundred
to
two
hundred
died
worth
of
money,
I
guess
because
of
the
weird
conversion
that
was
happening
whenever
I
was
needing
to
convert
them
and
the
fact
that
make
or
shut
down
their
bridge
to
do
that
so
now,
I
have
all
of
it.
A
A
B
A
Yeah
I
agree:
okay,
we'll
probably
will
go
ahead
with
that.
Then
I'll
reiterate
that
decision
and
the
chat
to
make
sure
there's
no
other
there's
a
chance
for
any
other
dissenting
opinions,
but
otherwise,
when
we
set
up
the
new
safe
or
when
we
keep
the
old,
safe
bowl,
add
puja,
okay,
I
think
that's
about
yeah!
That's
all
we
have
time
for
if
there's
anything,
we
missed
just
go
ahead
and
put
it
in
the
chat
and
we
can
work
through
it
there,
and
otherwise.
We
will
talk
to
you
all
in
two
weeks
right.