►
From YouTube: Ethereum Cat Herders Meeting 65
Description
Agenda: https://github.com/ethereum-cat-herders/PM/issues/222
A
Welcome
to
idiom
cathode
is
meeting
65.
I'm
gonna
share
agenda
in
that
chat
here.
So
the
first
item
on
agenda
is
ech
updates.
The
first
one
listed
here
is
ech
website
and
decide
on
whether
to
pay
for
ech
marketing.
For
the
website.
On
that,
I
did
pass
this
information
to
the
website.
Development
team,
unfortunately
michael,
could
not
join
the
call.
He
mentioned
that
he
has
a
schedule,
conflicts
and
he
would
not
be
able
to
join.
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
A
So
what
happens
like
when
it
is
on
github?
It
will
close
the
pull
request
that
would
not
be
shown,
but
I
am
not
sure
if
the
status
is
being
changed.
So
you
are
saying
this
part.
I
mean
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
if
this
part
will
be
able
to
change
the
status
to
withdrawn
or
just
remove
it
from
the
pull
request
section.
A
C
A
All
right
yeah,
that
sounds
good
to
me.
We
have
been
waiting
for
this
thing
for
a
while,
like
with
the
earlier
part,
the
proposals
which
are
there
in
the
repository
they
are
closed
and
they
are
marked
stale
and
closed,
but
the
status
does
not
change
and
we
would
like
the
status
to
be
changed
on
eips.ethereum.org
as
well.
So
I
hope
with
the
working
of
this
part,
it
will
be
really
helpful,
like
we'll
be
getting
a
clear
picture
of
which
proposals
are
in
active
status.
A
C
Essentially,
I
built
like
a
simple
version
because,
like
it
was
the
fastest
thing
to
do,
and
micah
might
have
some
some
suggestions
on
like
better
features
to
implement
and
so
depending
on
what
we
come
to
on
that
like
I
could.
I
could
potentially
launch
it
like
today,
or
I
might
need
to
wait
until
like
a
week
or
two.
A
D
Sure
so,
last
couple
of
weeks,
I've
been
involved
in
trying
to
get
an
initiative
for
basically
trying
to
get
a
group
wallet
test,
a
working
group
working
on
wallet
testing
together
in
order
to
kind
of
streamline
finding
like
major
kind
of
cross-wall
issues
and
also
specific
recurring
wallet
issues.
Initiative
was
suggested
by
someone
in
status,
so
we've
been
trying
to
find
some
resources
and
get
comments
together.
D
For
that,
I
was
also
involved
a
bit
in
trying
to
get
an
nft
together
for
the
london
for
for
the
london
either
network
upgrade
or
hard
fork.
Whichever
nomenclature,
you
prefer
started,
some
of
the
distribution
from
that
got
disrupted
by
london,
actually
because
the
wallet
rollouts
for
london
support
were
a
bit
slow
need
to
get
back
to
that
and
finish
that
up,
I've
been
working
with
ether,
ethernet
dao
on
doing
some
onboarding
work
over
there.
D
Their
goal
is
to
take
senior
devs
who
are
interested
in
other,
like
non-blockchain
disciplines
who
are
interested
in
getting
into
the
blockchain
ecosystem
and
training
them
up.
So
I've
been
trying
to
work
there,
just
lending
some
skills
for
onboarding,
and
I
think
that's
been.
My
main
focus
is
for
the
last
two
weeks.
I
might
be
missing
something
or
two
things
are
getting
to
the
point
like
where
I've
got
enough
going
on.
A
Awesome
yeah
so
yeah
I
was.
I
was
about
to
say
that
this
wallet,
testing
and
working
with
ethernet
data,
either
not
tao
that
you
just
mentioned.
I'm
not
sure,
I'm
just
throwing
some
ideas
like.
Would
it
be
possible
for
you
to
do
a
write-up
about
it
like
what
you
are
doing
or
maybe,
if,
if
you
would
like
to
invite
more
people
to
join
the
work
or
testing
is
being
done?
If
you
have
any
thoughts
on
that.
D
A
A
D
B
A
E
A
Short
duration,
thank
you,
william
schwab,
for
having
the
artist
like
taking
the
responsibility
of
distribution.
I
have
added
the
wallets
of
whoever
reached
out
to
us
or
whatever
we
can
collect.
We
I
believe,
like
this
distribution
will
be
completed
soon,
as
as
william
already
mentioned,
that
it
was
load
because
of
the
upgrade
itself.
So
we
hope
that
it
will
be
kept
answered.
A
A
F
A
A
My
recommendation
to
them
would
be
to
start
a
new
fellowship
of
a
keto
magician
thread,
and
then
I
think
this
proposal
can
be
considered
as
a
baseline
or
if
they
have
entirely
different
approach
to
manage
their
royalty
standard
for
nfd
that
can
be
proposed
so
yeah.
I
also
have
left
comment
on
the
issue.
A
A
A
I
think
I
missed
one
sub
item
from
the
earlier
topic
that
was
eip
and
erc
meeting.
So
last
tuesday
we
have
this
eip
editor
mentorship
meeting
with
william
schwab
lifeline
me,
and
we
went
through
several
proposals
like
kindly
shared
his
tips
and
tricks
and
suggestions.
How
we
should
look
into
these
proposals
and
we
jointly
left
some
comments.
A
A
A
Okay,
moving
on
the
next
item
is
the
squad
channel
so
we're
trying
to
manage
iridium
cathode
as
discard
with
different
channels,
and
you
know,
try
to
engage
people
more
into
conversations
like
whatever
they
would
like
to
discuss.
If,
if
that
is
not
highly
technical
or
if
that
is
not
related
to
research
based,
they
can
come
to
the
ethereum
categories,
community
channel
and
discuss
about
it
in
that
process.
Recently
we
have
so
in
that
process.
A
So
recently
we
received
a
request
of
having
a
governance
channel
like
not
governance
of
ethereum,
in
a
specific
but
ethereum
in
general,
like
whatever
they
would
like
to
think
about
the
process
or
the
changes
or
if
they
would
like
to
talk
anything
related
to
governance,
if
we
can
provide
them
a
proper
placeholder.
For
that,
I
believe
I
had
this
channel
created
for
governance
as
general
discussion,
but
it
seems
it
is
not
active
for
all
people.
It
is
not
being
used
properly.
So
what?
What
is
a
thought
here
like?
A
Yeah,
I
would
agree
that
having
too
many
channels
like
kind
of
too
much
for
people
to
look
into,
but
it's
my
personal
thought
as
well
like
having
a
topic
specific
channel,
also
gives
an
opportunity
to
people
to
come
and
join
it
for
that
particular
topic
like,
for
example,
in
our
server
there
are
miners,
mostly
miners
are
talking
in
a
specific
channel
like
that
is
a
proper
channel.
I
think
it's
time
to
rename
it
or
not.
A
I
don't
know
most
of
the
miners
are
talking
there
and
in
eip1559
channel
initially
now
that
eip1559
is
also
released.
I
don't
know
if
they
would
like
to
archive
that
channel
or
rename
it
or
like
kind
of
move.
A
different
thing,
so
topic
specific
channel
is
a
good
one
for
following.
If
people
is
interested,
people
are
interested
in
one
particular
topic,
but
yeah
I'm
open
to
suggestions
here.
What
do
other
people
think
generally.
B
A
All
right
yeah,
because
you
know
I
mean
I
have
been-
I
don't
know-
I
was
planning
to
propose
one
more
channel
which
I'm
not
sure
if
it
is
right
at
this
point
of
time,
but
anyway,
I'm
going
to
share
it.
Generally.
People
come
here
and
look
for
job
opportunities
right.
So
what
my
initial
take
was
like
to
move
them
to
off
topic
channel
and
talk
about
job
opportunities
there,
and
I
was
continuously
posting.
If
there
is
any
opportunity,
I
find
it
anywhere
on
twitter
or
or
any
other
chat
portal.
A
So,
instead
of
posting
it
on
off
topic,
maybe
we
can
have
a
like
a
job
channel
on
vacancy
channel
or
something
like
that.
So
people
can
easily
relate
okay.
This
is
related
to
jobs
opportunities.
So
if
someone
is
looking
for
it
or
someone
is
willing
to
post
an
opportunity
there,
that
would
be
a
good
one
for
them.
A
A
A
A
That's
on
the
funding
side,
I
also
had
meeting
with
molex
team
last
friday,
and
now
they
are
trying
to
involve
cathedrals
into
more
activities
and
tasks.
Maybe
they
are
planning
to
provide
funding
for
some
activities
related
to
ethereum
two
or
the
upcoming
merge.
So
I'm
in
touch
with
people
and
see
if
we
can
come
up
with
different
ideas
or
if
we
can
find
different
group
that
needs
support.
A
The
next
item
is
discuss
and
close
the
ech
github
issues
and
prs
on
the
project
management
side.
I
do
not
see
any
new
issue
and
on
funding,
I
believe,
okay
funding.
I
believe
we
have
closed
all
the
funding
requests,
except
for
william
shawn,
which
I'll
try
to
do
it
today,
oh
yeah,
you
have
added
the
ether
scan
length.
Thank
you,
william.
So
for
the
reimbursement
of
gas.
Here
we
generally
try
to
re,
reimburse
an
act,
and
that's
why
I
have
requested
you
to
provide
the
ether
scam
link.
A
I
haven't
got
a
chance
to
talk
to
him,
yet
I
was
planning
to
meet
him,
but
unfortunately
I
could
not
manage
last
week
so
we'll
try
to
do
it
in
upcoming
weeks
in
the
next
meeting
discuss
whether
the
people
hosting
ac's
website
should
be
hired
to
manage
easiest
social
media.
Okay
in
general,
we
did
not
have
any
discussion
as
yet.
I
believe
in
the
last
meeting
we
discussed
that
let's
have
the
proposal
first
and
then
accordingly,
we'll
decide
whether
to
go
about
it
or
not.
A
B
The
meeting
notes
were
there
except
for
37,
which
we
skipped
because
there
was
some
other
some
other
issue
on
that
day
and
they
push
that
forward
to
the
next
meeting.
But
anyway,
they're
all
missing
and
I
fixed
all
those
and
also
meeting
36
had
a
broken
link
in
it
because
of
a
case
issue.
It
worked
on
windows,
but
it
didn't
work
on
the
upgraded.
So
I
fixed
that.
But
anyway,
all
that's
fixed.
Just
fyi.