►
From YouTube: EIP Editing Office Hour 20
Description
Agenda: https://github.com/ethereum-cat-herders/EIPIP/issues/244
A
Welcome
everyone
to
EIP
editing
office
hour
meeting
20
I
have
shared
agenda
in
chat.
Thank
you,
Sam
for
joining
us
and
thank
you.
Everyone
who
took
out
time
to
discuss
your
proposal
with
the
editor
Sam
Wilson
Sam.
If
you
would
like
to
maybe
screen
share,
and
we
can
take
up
the
proposals
here,.
A
B
Let
me
just
finish
this
comment
here
then
we
can,
we
can
get
started.
B
All
right
so
4910
I
can't
really
do
anything
with
that's
waiting
on
my
client
Matt
to
either
approve
or
or
request
more
changes.
Let's
see
so
this
one's
approved,
there's
no
other
changes
required
on
it.
It's
just
our
Bots
are
being
dumb
today,
so
it
won't.
Auto
merge
same
with
this
one.
B
B
Yeah
I
think
I
think
we're
all
set.
B
B
Approved
or
eipip
topics
not
really
right.
A
D
B
Is
approved
all
right
social
recovery
interface,
that's
approved
pre-compiled
for.
B
Yeah:
okay,
unless
there's
not
like
authors
here
with
questions,
feel
free
to
jump
in
and
ask
otherwise
I'll
just
go
through
these.
C
B
Sure
so
the
EIP
process
is
very
much
author
driven.
So
once
this
gets
merged,
there's
a
draft
once
you
feel
it's
ready
to
move
to
review,
you
can
open
a
PR
to
move
it
into
the
review
stage
and
then,
through
all
of
the
other
statuses,
all
the
way
to
final
we're
here
to
kind
of
walk
you
through
the
process,
but
it
goes
at
whatever
Pace
you
want
to
take
it
at
yeah.
B
So
so
why
SEC
p256
R1
and
not
one
of
the
the
newer
curves
I
meant
to
ask
that.
B
Oh,
why
SEC
p256
R1
and
not
one
of
the
the
newer
curbs.
C
It's
one
of
the
most
Mass
adapted
cars
in
the
in
the
internet
ecosystem.
It's
used
by
lots
of
secure
elements
and
internet
Solutions
like
SSL
TLS,
Apple,
security
and
Clay
pass
case
web
Orton,
and
we
believe
that
this
curves
enable
enabling
in
ethereum
would
enable
authentication
mechanism
by
this
kind
of
solution
which
are
most
secure
ones
to
be
used
in
ethereum.
B
Yeah
that
looks
pretty
much
perfect.
I
think
there
was
just
the
one.
C
B
I
think,
like
you
know,
taking
off
my
editor
hat
for
a
moment,
I
think
you
might
have
some
pushback
from
core
developers
adding
this,
but
generally
I
think
I
agree
that
it
will
be
useful.
E
D
So
I
I'm
here
with
the
the
other
co-authors,
who's
also
working
on
this
EIP,
since
it's
our
first
time.
So
we
when
we
submitting
into
a
PRS,
we
got
a
lot
of
like
a
check.
Failure
kind
of
thing
spend
more
than
a
day
to
fix
it.
D
So
we
kind
of
wanted
to
spend
some
time
here,
first
of
all,
to
introduce
a
little
bit
more
on
the
concept
why
we
want
to
start
the
CIP
and
what
kind
of
value
we
think
it's
bringing
to
the
foundation
and
then
the
second
part
is
I,
want
to
hear
a
little
bit
more
onto
the
process
office
getting
submitted
and
what
are
the
next
steps
and
and
how
to
proceed
from
there
and
then.
D
The
third
part
is
that
we
wanted
to
also
get
some
feedbacks
from
the
content
side
of
things
so
and
also
like
how
you
guys
are
feeding
back
to
the
EIP
or
the
proposal
that
we're
drafting
for
the
foundation.
B
Sure
sounds
good,
so,
like
I
said
earlier,
I
think
the
process
is
very
much
author
driven
so
after
this
gets
merged.
It's
up
to
you
guys
to
decide
when
you
want
to
move
into
the
next
stage,
which
is
review
and
then
all
the
other
stages
after
that.
B
As
for
for
review
of
the
content,
I'm,
not
an
expert
on
anything
I
if
I
see
anything
that
jumps
out
at
me,
I'll
try
to
make
a
comment
about
it,
but
the
EIP
process
isn't
really
built
to
provide
good
technical
feedback
and
we
kind
of
leave
that
up
to
authors
to
solicit
on
their
own.
Unfortunately,
there
is
the
nft
working
group
which
might
be
of
interest
if
you're
not
already
aware
of
it
and
I
can
send
you
a
link
to
that.
If
you'd,
like
yeah.
B
B
B
Yeah
yeah
exactly
so:
they
they
do
a
lot
of
interesting
work
and
provide
technical
review
for
nft
related
projects.
So
hopefully
they'll
be
useful.
B
Okay,
okay,
aviation
of
popular
traditionalities
to
nfts
authorized
by
individuals
gives
attributes
of
ownership
relationships
and
experiences
all
right
21
by
buying
individuals
with
213
identities,
non-punchable
tokens.
B
All
right
so
so.
F
F
I
think
he's
just
asking
what
we
can
do
in
the
meantime,
to
to
help
with
the
process
the
review
process
and.
B
There's
not
much
to
do
the
EIP
process
is
somewhat
slow,
so
don't
worry
too
much
if
it
takes
a
little
bit
of
time
to
move
through
it.
Okay
coming
to
these
is
great,
especially
if
you
have
specific
questions.
A
One
suggestion
perhaps
I
can
share
here
is
like
whatever
you
are
getting
as
a
feedback
out
of
this
call.
If
you
go
ahead
and
Implement
that
before
the
next
call-
and
we
do
not
find
any,
you
know
issues
in
merging
it
or
have
no
more
suggestions.
Hopefully
your
proposal
will
move
faster.
You
just
need
to
be
around
to
push
it
forward.
D
F
E
B
B
B
B
B
F
F
B
You
should
say
something
like
like:
a
compliant
contract
has
to
implement
erc606x
or
you
know.
We
use
these
types
from
the
erc6066,
but
you
should
mention
that
in
the
specification
section
somewhere.
A
Right,
so,
if
you
are
aware
of
authors
or
author
is
one
of
your
co-authors,
that
is
very
well
and
we
would
recommend
to
you
to
perhaps
push
both
proposals,
because
if
the
present
proposal,
which
I
suppose
will
be
6734
right,
so
if
that
needs
six
zero,
six
six
to
be
implemented,
it's
going
to
be
stopping
at
some
point.
B
D
B
To
keep
in
mind
if
your
proposal
doesn't
depend
on
6066
and
can
be
implemented
without
it,
that
can
be
better
because
you
don't
have
to
wait
for
6066
to
to
standardize,
but
it's
totally
fine.
If
you
do
it
doesn't
matter
it's
up
to
you.
F
F
A
F
F
E
E
B
E
B
B
Otherwise,
I
think
this
is
pretty
good.
My
only
concern
here
is
that.
B
B
B
B
E
E
E
D
B
E
E
B
It
wouldn't
be
EIP
editing,
office
hours
if
Mr
Moo
wasn't
eating
a
table.
So,
let's
see
if
your
person
is
interesting
to
support
multiple
meditative
URLs
per
token,
let's
say.
B
E
E
E
B
E
G
A
B
Perfect
thanks
for
organizing
Puja
I'll
talk
to
you
all
in
two
weeks.