►
From YouTube: EIP editor's apprenticeship meeting 11
B
C
The
one
which
is
moving
to
last
call
or
final,
I
believe,
won't.
A
B
A
A
Know
what
I
mean
yeah,
let's
just
take
a
little
look
here:
real
quick
backwards
compatibility
reference
implementation.
B
B
D
B
D
The
one
that
I
did
look
at
that
was
kind
of
neat
was
that
multi-fractional
nft
one.
I
think
that
actually
has
a
chance
of
maybe
being
useful
for
somebody.
B
B
B
A
C
A
question
sorry
going
back
to
the
1776:
did
they
actually
try
to
document
something,
or
is
it
a
new
form
of
spamming.
B
D
It
it
does
kind
of
read
like
something
written
by
like
a
gpt3,
though
oh
yeah.
B
B
A
C
So
I
found
a
like
about
greg's
proposal.
C
A
B
A
A
B
Okay,
so
this
is
not
the
the
fractional
non-fungible.
Whatever
is
not
the
same
exact
thing:
it
does
look
like
it's
a
new
standard
and
they've
abandoned
the
other
one.
It
was
good
yeah
like
in
many
ways.
I'd
say
the
new
one
is
significantly
weirder,
but
what
can
you
do
like
they?
Now?
Basically,
I
mean
the
basic
idea
as
far
as
I
can
tell
that
I
didn't
read
it
like
super
closely.
B
The
second,
the
idea
is
that
normally,
when
you
fractionalize
net
ft,
so
you
fractionalize
it
into
rc20
compliant
tokens,
so
he
wants
to
make
the
fractions,
like
the
the
fractional
pieces
of
that
nft,
not
erc20,
but
kind
of
their
own,
almost
exactly
like
the
rc20
standard,
even
though
they're
still
like
in
a
different
contract.
D
C
C
A
A
B
C
But
that
can
be
fixed
right.
I
I
totally
only
I
found
one
proposal
I
think
171
it
was.
It
has
a
type
1
that
was
merged.
A
C
A
I
gotta
get
off
here
in
a
minute.
Is
there?
Is
there
something
specific
that
we
that
you
wanted
to
talk
about
pooja
or
anyone
else.
A
C
D
C
Yeah
so
here,
if
you
look
into
the
file,
it
has
an
additional
field.
I
don't
know
how
it
got.
Meshed,
yeah,
updated.
A
E
B
It
was
about
1967,
I
think.
Oh
no,
sorry,
26
12.,
you
may
have
done
it.
While
I
wasn't
watching.
I
was
on
the
screen
a
lot
of
times.
B
Yeah,
there's,
that's
not
I.
I
was
moving
it
to
review.
You
had
some
suggestions
and
I
pushed
them.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
find
the
exact
the
exact
pr
yeah
it's
46.53.