►
From YouTube: EIPIP Meeting 70
Description
Agenda: https://github.com/ethereum-cat-herders/EIPIP/issues/195
B
Welcome
to
eipip
meeting
number
70
I
have
shared
agenda
in
chat.
We
have
few
items
for
discussion
suggested
by
Sam
and
Victor,
so
have
included
only
open
items
because
by
the
time
we
have
this
meeting,
a
few
of
them
are
already
closed.
B
So
starting
from
the
first
item,
which
is
about
update
Eid
3475
I'm,
sharing
the
link
here
in
the
chat
for
reference,
it
was
suggested
by
Sam,
so
Sam.
If
you
quickly
like
to
give
one
minute
intro
or
overview
for
this,
and
then
we
can
start
discussing
the
issue,
sure.
C
It's
so
we're
changing
our
final
EIP
and
I
just
wanted
to
check.
If
anybody
has
any
opinions
about
it,.
C
C
Just
changing
the
comments
that,
with
the
examples.
D
E
I
think
if,
if
this
meeting
is
about
General
policy,
then
maybe
that
will
be
even
more
helpful
is
that
we
lay
out
the
principles
of
what,
when
do,
we
agreed
on
that
is
okay
to
modify
it
or
not,
and
then
I
think
for
individual
loans
if
they
can
later
be
applied
with
those
principles
that
editors
agree
with,
who
had
a
good?
C
C
And
and
similar
things,
so
my
general
policies
don't.
A
C
Finally,
IPS
yeah.
B
So
I
was
mentioning
this
in
the
last
meeting,
like
sometimes
when
proposals
are
not
getting
enough
reviews,
probably
on
the
review
comment,
or
we
comment
in
General
on
discussion
to
thread,
and
it
keeps
moving
to
one
status
to
another
status,
chances
of
moving
them
into
final.
B
They
move
faster,
but
we
may
miss
some
obvious
points.
I
wonder
if
we
should
recommend,
like
editor,
should
recommend
any
ballpark
time
period
for
consideration
for
these
kind
of
proposals.
So
we
do
not
have
to
edit
final
eips,
but
we
make
all
the
edits
before
that.
C
D
C
B
That's
a
good
point:
I
think
I
have
added
peer
review
in
today's
just
because
we
can
probably
get
more
cards
over
there,
but
just
for
information
for
people.
Listening
to
this
call,
generally
speaking,
recommendation
for
changes
in
the
final
status
proposals.
We
have
added
a
feedbacks
from
editors
from
earlier
meeting
and
according
to
this,
a
final
EIT
May
accept
non-normative
changes.
B
However,
it
is
again
best
to
avoid
any
changes
to
final
proposal,
so
if
there
are
more
than
like
smaller
changes,
it
was
recommended
earlier
to
come
up
with
a
new
proposal
altogether
than
just
trying
to
edit
these
proposals,
but
obviously,
given
this
proposal,
this
is
relatively
new
and
we
can
obviously
collect
feedback
from
more
editors.
C
B
C
C
B
A
E
Maybe
it's
it's
kind
of
people,
but
I
can
understand
the
the
interest
of
adding
tag
but
yeah.
Maybe
it
will
let
maybe
to
end
up
able
to
explain
a
bit
more
I
I
have
lost
you
and
I've
not
seen
this
propose
again.
B
B
All
right
that
will
lead
us
to
the
peer
review
discussion
on
calculus
Discord.
There
was
this
discussion
for
peer
review.
Like
should
proposal
get
more
reviews.
There
was
also
proposal
of
Junior
reviewer,
probably
Romance,
by
domain
specific
reviewer
and
copy
editor
kind
of
thing,
so
yeah
Sam,
you
mentioned
that
you
are
already
working
in
that
direction.
So
if.
C
You
can
sort
of
yeah,
so
I
think
adding
another
level
of
editors
is
not
useful
unless
we
have
some
kind
of
a
Q
system
like
if.
C
C
C
Provide
feedback
if
they
want
to,
but
I
have
tried
to
organize
kind
of
a
peer
review
list.
So
there's
a
hack
MD
that
I've
given
to
the
editors
of
people
who
have
volunteered
to
read
and
comment
on
the
technical
side
of
VIPs.
C
This
is
in
response
to
Greg's
comment
that
we
don't
have
it
up
here,
reviewers
or
or
we
don't
get
enough
peer
reviews.
So.
C
Into
a
few
categories
like
nfts
and
execution,
clients
stuff
like
that
and
yeah,
if
you
like
merger,
PR
from
draft
or
or
merge
a
draft
PR
nope,
that's
wrong
too
virgin.
A
C
Been
working
reasonably
well,
I've
gotten
two
people
to
reply
with
peer
review
feedback
and
yeah.
A
C
People
seem
genuinely
pretty
excited
to
work
on
it,
so
yeah,
just
a
new
resource
for
editors
so
feel
free
to
go
and
start
using.
It.
D
Github
no
I
mean
like
how
like
what
is
your
process
right
now
for,
like
connecting.
C
The
reviewers,
with
oh
I,
things
like.
C
C
D
Yeah
yeah.
D
C
C
D
E
E
Of
having
fewer
reviews,
peer
reviews
provides
better
sense
of
contributions
and
also
like
I
kind
of
want
to
also
advocating
Advocate
some
sentiments
in
the
in
the
author
group
that
if
you
author,
it's
actually
your
responsibility
to
research
and
consult
and
like
ask
for
peer
reviews
like
that's
what
I'm
trying
to
deal
with
some
of
my
the
new
vip's
and
then
so.
E
We
can,
over
time
in
the
process
like
look
at
erc's,
see
who
they
nominate
and
then
so
it's
a
peer-nominated
peer
review
list
that
we
can
grow
and
yeah
and
also
also
I,
don't
agree
with
the
like
clients
about.
Maybe
we
could
think
about
where
we
can
publish
that
list.
So
people
get
more
visibility
of
hey,
there's
a
thing
of
your
video
and
you
can
contribute
here
because
you
add
on
your
species
the
value
of
that
type
of
thing.
C
C
People
to
participate
is
important
and
getting
authors
to
nominate
people
is
also
probably.
A
C
B
Well,
thank
you.
No
thank
you
Victor
and
thanks
Sam
for
this
initiative.
I
mean
this
has
done.
Definitely
a
good
idea.
The
issue
of
not
getting
enough
reviews
or
maybe
not
getting
enough
for
constructive
feedback
was
always
mentioned
by
EAP
authors,
so
especially
for
new
Waters,
who
are
trying
to
do
it
for
the
first
time,
so
it
seems
very
valuable
for
them
to
get
it
more
reviews
and
I
guess.
B
B
I
see
a
comment
over
here,
my
moody
moody.
If
you
would
like
to
mention
that
I
guess,
it's
generally
a
suggestion,
yeah,
but
please
go
ahead.
F
Yeah
I'm,
just
like
like
one
thing
we
would
like
to
do
even
swap,
is
just
start
contributing
more
to
like
eips
that
are
related
to
like
smart
contract
interfaces.
We
would
love
that,
but.
F
Company
we
don't
like
have
like
a
good
feed
of
like,
what's
going
in,
that's
relevant
to
us
and
there's
a
lot
of
eips
and
some
of
them,
or
most
of
them
probably
aren't
relevant
to
us
so
like
it'd,
be
nice
to
have
so
so
today,
for
like
a
GitHub
PRS,
for
example,
we
have
slack
channels,
and
then
we
have
a
GitHub
application
that
we
can
subscribe
to
like
certain
repos
commits
output.
F
Requests
Etc,
like
it'd,
be
really
cool
to
have
something
similar
for
VIPs,
where
we
could
just
like
type
a
command
to
subscribe
to.
F
Yeah,
please
and
just
get
like
the
abstract
dropped
into
the
into
the
channel
like
yeah
I
bought
drops
in
like
pull
requests
summaries
into
the
slack
Channel,
and
so
it's
like
pretty
easy
to
know
what
you
need
to
click
so
just
like.
If
there's
something
like
that
that
other
companies
can
also
use
I
feel
like
that
would
help
a
lot
with
just
getting
more
participation
but
I'm,
not
sure
exactly
how
it's
best
built.
F
Yeah,
it
would
be
unfortunate
if
I
had
to
be
like
per
like
org.
So
maybe
there
should
be
like
EIP
editor
maintained,
Slack
application,
or
something
like
that,
so
that
people
can
just
come
and
register
this
like
application
and
then
subscribe
to
eaps.
C
F
Also
want
to
get
well
like
if
you
want
to
get
participation
from
many
different
applications.
True
true
specs,
it's
just
helpful
to
have
like
a
tool
where
we
can
like
set
it
up
and
then
also
I'm,
not
necessarily
going
to
be
the
one
who
reads
it.
It
could
be
like
anyone
who's
interested
in
that
particular
topic
like
at
the
unisoft
team.
So
it's
it's
really
nice
to
have
just
a
slack
Channel
where
you
can
see
the
abstracts
and
choose
which
ones
you
click
yeah,.
C
B
So
I
have
a
question
here:
I
like
this
information
that
could
be
useful
for
application
team
at
what
level
this
information
you
are
looking
for,
because
there
could
be.
You
know
numerous
amounts
of
things
going
out.
So
if
there
is
any
specific
requirement,
maybe
at
any
specific
status.
F
F
The
most
important
thing
to
just
have
in
the
message
that
goes
to
the
slide
channel
would
be
like
the
abstract
but
yeah
like
the
more
customizable,
the
better
because
I'm
getting
on
multiple
Channels
with
like
different
people
in
the
channels,
everyone
could
sort
of
customize
what
they
I
want
to
see.
B
Right
I
can
think
of
something
like
this
like.
Maybe
we
can
create
a
GitHub
channel
that
could
be
automated
by
a
bar
in
which
they
can
probably
add
ERC
specific
comments
or
a
merch
when
it
happens,
could
be
added
over
there,
but
customization.
We
may
want
to
look
further
into
it
and
just
FYI
as
like
and
was
mentioning.
We
do,
have
an
RSS
feed
available
on
eipstvm.org
I'm
sharing
the
link
right
here.
That
is
for
last
call
only
so
in
case.
B
That
is
helpful,
at
least
for
the
time
being
any
ERC
proposal
getting
into
last
call.
That
means
that
is
there
for
another
14
days.
Team
can
probably
add
their
feedback
starts.
F
D
F
A
D
C
F
F
B
Thank
you
so
yeah.
This
is
a
very
good
discussion
here.
I
probably
wish
you
to
look
into
getting
more
RSS
feed
depending
upon
category
and
Status
right
now
we
have
it
only
for
the
last
call.
Thank
you
diagram
for
sharing
the
article
I
hope
that
would
be
helpful
for
people
who
are
interested
in
looking
into
building
up
their
song.
B
All
right,
moving
on
to
item
number
two,
this
is
from
discussion,
contribute
for
earlier
meetings.
There
were
two
items
suggested
by
Victor,
but
it
looks
like
the
one
5980
is
already
merged,
so
we
are
here
with
another
one,
which
is
add
Twitter
as
an
EIT
editor
yeah
Victor.
If
you
would
like
to
share
more
from
where
we
were
on
the
last
time
we
visited
this
item
and
where
we
are
now
and
then
again,
maybe
yeah
have
opinion
of
other
editors.
E
B
E
Think
that,
last
time,
while
we
were
discussing
that
having
having
me
as
an
editor,
I,
think
kind
of
nominated
as
a
practice
and
supporting
Sanders
and
support
too
and
then
but
I
think
that
PR
was
merged
on
maturity.
But
you
didn't
get
to
hear
What
platform
thing
and
then
so
I'll
kind
of
realize
that
I
haven't
worked
with
lifetime
for
a
long
enough
to
kind
of
show
what
I
but
I.
What
I
do.
E
I
have
some
if
I
wear
half-up
attitude,
so
I
think
after
two
two
months,
I
think
it's
a
I
work
with
the
supply
like
mine.
A
little
bit
more
and
I
just
want
to
get
it
out
with
other
people.
Think
in
the
room.
E
C
Yeah,
okay,
so
I
think
the
only
thing
that's
changed
on
my
friend
is
and
I.
C
Concerned
about
philosophical
alignment
and
I
I
do
want
to
have
a
more
focused
discussion
about
that
and.
A
You
know
from
from,
like
a
editor
perspective,.
C
C
I
think
my
only
concern
is
is
making
sure
that
you
know
we.
We
want
to
build
the
same
thing,
I'm,
not
exactly
sure
how
to
approach
that
kind
of
a
discussion
and
I'm
not
sure
if
we
should
do
it
without
more
editors.
C
I
don't
know
if
Matt
is
still
here
but
yeah.
C
E
Yeah,
of
course,
I'm
happy
to
hear
it,
but
what
you
have
in
mind
so.
A
Because
Greg's
already
an
editor
but
for
me.
D
Yeah
I
feel
similarly
and
for
me,
I
also
feel
like
the
ERC
that
you
authored
a
few
months
ago
about
creating
a
standard
for
applications
to
understand
sanction
lists
that
to
me,
I
find
like
concerning
coming
from
somebody
who
is
like
wanting
to
be
an
editor
because
I
feel
like
this
is
like
very
much
against
the
values
of
ethereum
overall
and
yeah.
That's
another
piece
of
concern
for
me.
E
B
E
Me
first
address
where
I
come
from
and
then
what
I
think
what
I
think
my
philosophy
is
that
you
can
assess
whether
that
is.
That
is
what
you're
looking
for
so
I
come
from
contributing
to
Wikipedia
and
then
so.
I
have
a
very
the
passion
about
being
open
and.
E
About
open
contributor
community
and
then
being
open
in
a
sense
that
it's
in
a
sense
that
I
felt
that
we
need
to
allow
people
to
contribute
as
easy
as
possible
so
and
that's
to
begin
with,
and
some
of
our
policies
align
with
that.
Some
of
our
policy
didn't
like
I
personally
felt
it
in
line
with
that,
because
sometimes
when
we,
when
we
are
in
close
requirement,
for
example
like
sample,
we
debate
about
external
links
or
whether
the
link
needs
to
be
free.
I
felt
like
that.
E
You
have
a
strong
sense
of
of
being
requiring
the
Solace
to
be
to
be
accessible,
which
I
totally
agree.
I
kind
of
hold
the
philosophical
approach
that
we
take
these
kind
of
things
gradually
like
we
allow
people
we,
instead
of
having
a
hard
more
of
hey
if
you're,
not
free
you're,
not
entering
like.
We
are
going
to
build
isolated
Islands
to
avoid
us
to
interact
with
any
people
who
are
not
strictly
the
same
deals
with
us,
which
is
more
of
a
life
like
I.
E
Think
it's
more
of
the
G
gnu
or
like
GPL
type
of
philosophy,
philosophy,
I'm
more
on
the
MIT
licensed
the
SDA
license
side
like
Let
Me,
Be
Free,
like
if
you're
a
good
guy
I'm
I
want
you
to
be
able
to
use
this
I
want
you
to
be
able
to
contribute
with
us.
E
But
if
you
happen
to
be
a
bad
guy,
like
I'm
kind
of
okay
to
being
abused
a
little
bit
like
so
long
as
you
don't
get
into
us
that
that's
my
my
type
of
thing
so,
but
we
will
I
I'm
I'm,
hoping
to
build
a
gradient
of
incentives
so
that
people
will
do
the
good
things
like
that's.
Why?
When
I
talk
to
you
hey
how
about
we
do,
if
you
have
a
free
list,
if
you
have
a
have
a
free
version,
cheaper
version,
you
should
link
to
the
cheaper
version.
E
So
we
build
this
gradient
of
incentive.
So
that's
the
type
of
thing
and
then
the
other
thing
is
like
clients
when
I
address
the
jurisdiction
and
that's
not
what
I
meant
to
them
to
to
sanction
or
to
to
help
sanction.
E
I
I
want
this
to
be
clear
that
that
purpose,
the
purpose
is
avoiding
or
massively
avoiding
people
trying
to
do
section
on
the
core
level,
like
you
will
see
application
layer,
the
form
of
sanction,
okay,
any
time
and
anyhow,
and
then
my
feel
is
that
if
we
build
a
safer
net
so
that
at
least
people
who
are
concerned
of
their
jurisdiction
can
still
use
ethereum,
then
they're
not
they
will
be
less
pressure
on
on
kind
of
asking
the
core
to
to
change
or
to
to
to
to
be
able
to
sanction
transactions.
E
So
what
my
view
here
is
that
I
take
a
two-layer
approach
on
the
core.
We
should
be
very
strong
about
non-sanction.
We
should
be
resistance
of
sexual
and
even
build
a
strong
algorithm
to
to
add
incentive
to
against
sanction
censorship,
but
on
the
application
layer
we
should
realize
that
there's
companies
there
is
dials
that
want
to
have
their
own
jurisdictions,
some
of
the
doubt,
or
there
might
be
countries
that
in
that
night,
so.
A
E
Kind
of
my
philosophical
views,
but
let
me
take
one
step
back
and
I
think
the
court
might
believe
is
even
more
important
than
these
two
I
think
it's
considered
more
of
a
details.
If
I
may
say
my
core
belief
is
community
should
be
open
to
contributors,
but
it's
not
freely
open.
The
entry
values
should
be
based
on
contributions.
E
Just
like
Apache
Community
has
this
principle
that
everyone
can
contribute,
but
Authority
comes
from,
but
Authority
and
Trust
are
earned
not
for
bike
for
granted.
It's
earned
by
contributions.
So
that's
what
I
I
believe,
one
open
contributor,
Community
admission
and
the
step
and
the
second
deal.
That's
not
philosophically,
is
that
I
believe
in
consensus.
It's
a
strongly
impure
consensus.
E
So
that's
why
I
kind
of
create
the
voting
standard
and
and
like
at
least
not
trying
to
like
advocate
for
voting
schedule
on
channel
governance,
and
if
you
see
a
lot
of
my
EIP
authorship,
it's
all
about
kind
of
how
you
help
governance
governance
so
that
people
can
do
it
decentralizedly.
But
my
view
is
that
people
should
be
able
to
come
into
consensus
and
at
least
you
should
there's
two
ways
to
do
that
in
society:
it's
either
a
more
Major
Tool.
It's
it's
Catholics
and
it's
it's
bizarre.
E
Like
classes
Bazaar,
these
essays
I'll
talk
about
that
I.
F
E
That
you
I
I'm
more
confident
and
then
in
that
sense
we
should
be
able
to
come
to
consensus
and
that's
why
I
was
surprised
in
the
hike
when
I
debate
with
panda
pit.
Like
you
probably
see
my
debate
like
I
I
fight
100
in
in
the
discussion
about
external
links
or
like
quite.
B
E
I
want
to
do
a
connected
world,
not
isolated
work
world
of
knowledge,
and
then
I
was
surprised
by
pentatives
when
he
nominated
me
as
editor,
even
though
I
strongly
disagree
with
him
on
how
we
should
deal
with
links
and
that's
why
I
felt
I
kind
of
being
welcomed
in
the
EIP
process,
because,
even
though
some
of
the
ideas
we
might
disagree,
I
still
felt
that
this
group
will
come
diverse
diversity
of
ideas,
diversity
of
views
so
long
as
the
core
value,
as
you
might
be
concerned,
like
so
long
as
the
core
value
we
agree
upon
and
then
for
a
core
value.
E
I
believe
for
myself
is
that
we
should
be
open
to
contributors
and
we
should
be
able
to
Value
consensus
like
what
I
would
not
do
is
I
will
not
try
to
depend
when
editors
or
when
someone
I
work
with.
A
E
A
policy
I
will
not
unilaterally
act
different
from
the
policy.
I
will
try
to
interpret
the
policy,
as
is
as
much
as
I
can,
but
I'll
I'll
find
in
a
debate
when
I
disagree
with
the
policy,
but
in
actions.
I
will
follow
the
policy
that
even
if
I
disagree
with
which
I
hope
that,
if
you
work
with
me,
you
will
notice
that
I
I'm.
E
When
I
noticed
that
people
that
added
a
group
of
tweet
that
there's
no
way
to
pause,
that's
that's
not
where
I
come
from.
I
would
disagree
my
view,
but
once
the
discussion
is
done,
conclusion
is
up.
I
will
follow
what
the
government's
body
that
I'm
participating
with
about
the
decisions.
That's
the
two
core
values.
I
have
and
I'm
I'm
just
talking
here
in
order
to
hear
what
you
think.
C
So
I
think
you
touched
on
the
the
topic
that
I'm
most
concerned
about,
and
that
is
while
I.
C
Anybody
should
be
able
to
contribute
to
the
eaps
repository
I.
Don't
think
that
that
is
the
like
core
purpose
of
it
right
like
we're
a
little
bit
different
from
other
standards
organizations
and
from
other
like
communities,
because
we,
the
people
who
write
eips,
are
often
not
the
people
who
are
like,
especially
for
core
eaps
they're,
not
the
people
who
are
going
to
be
consuming
them.
So,
like
I,
think
we
need
to
focus
on
like
resiliency
and
and
accessibility.
A
C
Openness
to
contribute
contributions
for
me
and
I
would
rather
turn
away
eips
or
proposals
that
don't
meet
our
bar
for
Quality
then
have
like
eips
that
don't
meet
those
bars
so
like
I
I,
really
don't
like
having
any
Links
at
all
in
the
IPS
I
I
think
that
it's
going
to
like
subvert
the
like
kind
of
my
core
idea
of
VIPs,
being
a
silo
of
information
that
isn't
danger
connected
to
anything
else
and
I.
I.
C
Think
that
you
know,
if
you
want
to
bring
this
idea
of
interconnected
knowledge
and
and
linking
everything
I
think
that's
completely.
That's
probably
the
biggest
philosophical
difference
is
that
I
want
the
eip's
repository
to
stand
alone,
not
be
linked
to
anything,
and
only
with
that
be
able
to
recreate
ethereum
and
I.
F
E
Is
what
our
glutenants,
of
course,
I
I'll,
follow
that
yeah
I.
A
E
Do
see
that
that
in
some
cases,
people
were
refrained
from
being
able
to
link
to
consensus
back,
which
we
are
addressed,
I
know
but
I
I
kind
of
want
to
use
the
friction
like
at
the
at
the
philosophical
like
at
the
level
that
we
allow,
but
yeah
I
I,
agree
with
you,
if
you,
if
you
if
what
this
group
wants
or
what
the
ethereums
in
general
wants,
is
what
this
EIP
Repository
to
to
be
able
to
review
and
sell
people
be
able
to
do
ethereum
itself.
E
I,
yeah,
I
I
can
understand
and
then
that
I
I
wouldn't
contest
that.
So
that
doesn't
context
with
the
core
value
that
I
have
is
for
open
contributors,
because
you,
if
you
look
at
from
the
other
perspective,
it's
allowing
people
who
have
might
not
have
internet
access
or
might
not
be
able
to
access
the
paywall
to
be
able
to
contribute
so
I
would
say.
The
link
is
more
kind
of
detail
now:
core
philosophy,
I
I,
don't
think
it
conscious.
Yeah
I
can
adjust
understanding.
I
have
to
understand
English
yeah.
A
C
C
Think
you
know
your
personal
beliefs
aside,
if
you're
willing
to
operate
on
the
eip's
repository
with
like
the
shared
goal
of
creating
a
resilient
available
like
durable
platform
first
and
then
your
your
personal
belief,
second
I,
think
you
know,
I
I'd
be
totally
fine
with
you
being
an
editor.
E
Thank
you,
and
actually
that's
my
according
to
me.
My
core
beliefs,
just
like
you
said,
is
that
when
you
operate
in
a
collaborating
environment
and
then,
if
you
are
acting
as
a
rule
enforcer,
you
should
enforce
the
rule
made
by
people.
You
should
follow
the
value
made
by
people
together,
like
that's,
that's
the
core
of
the
core
for
me
and
then
even
even
though
you
personally
disagree
with
that
and
then
I
I
wonder
if
I
I
make
it
clear.
That's
that's
exactly
what
I
believe.
A
C
Clear
so
I
hate
to
do
this
to
you,
but
I.
Don't
think
that
we
can
make
a
decision
today,
I
I,
don't
think
we
have
enough
like
we
need
at
least
Greg
or
Panda
or
somebody
else
to
chime
in
so
maybe
we
open
a
a
thread
on
Discord
or
something
just
to
gather
everybody
else's
opinion.
C
It
would
be
nice
to
have
a
third
person
that
attends
these
meetings
regularly.
So.
D
C
D
To
say
that
I
think
maybe
with
panda
being
added
as
an
editor
like
relatively
quickly
like.
Maybe
we
set
a
bit
of
a
precedent
of
editors
being
added
fast
and
historically,
that's
like
not
really
the
case
like
we've
had
people,
you
know,
I
think
it
was
for
me.
It
was
around
a
year.
Micah
I
was
kind
of
doing
stuff
for,
like
multiple
years
before
he
became.
D
Has
to
be
something
that
happens
like
quickly.
I
think
that
editors
are
people
who
are
like
just
deeply
involved
with
the
space.
Anyways
and
you
know,
are
good,
like
Guardians
the
process,
because
they
like
go
through
the
process
and
they
are
they
do
the
process,
they
understand
it,
and
so
it
feels
like
you
know
a
little
contrived.
It's
just
like
add
people
as
editors.
Just
add
editors
and
not
add
people
who
are
you
know
really
living
through
the
process
for
like
a
long
period
of
time.
C
D
C
Yeah,
like
I
I,
think
I
added
myself
in
like
a
week,
so
yeah
but
yeah
I
mean,
let's
you
know,
I
I,
think
you've
done
a
good
job
of
making
me
feel
more
comfortable
with
it.
Victor.
Let's
try
to
get.
You
know
everybody
involved
and
have
more
of
a
discussion
about
it,
and
hopefully.
E
Of
course,
of
course,
yeah,
thank
you
very
much.
Just
one
last
thing,
I
just
want
to
have
a
chance
to
kind
of
discuss
it
throughout
my
client
about
the
kind
of
did
I
address.
You
did
I
address
the
concern
or
like
do
you
want
to
discuss
a
little
bit
more
about
what
the
what
the
VIP
about
the
jurisdiction
and
sovereignty
is
part
of
question
I.
A
D
And
it's
not
like
a
good
thing
to
be:
focusing
on
I
think
that
trying
to
build
this
sanctions
list
to
stop
the
core
protocol
from
being
sanctioned
is
the
wrong
approach.
I
think
there
are
other
approaches
to
avoid.
You
know
to
create
a
platform,
that's
censorship,
resistant
and
Alliant
people
who
are
aligned
to
like
understand
this
or
who
evolved
or
the
processes
are
working
on
those
things,
and
so
I
think
that
you're
outside
the
loop
in
that
case.
B
So
I
can
see
there
is
a
number
assigned
to
it.
I
guess
it's
a
pull
request.
Number
five,
seven
or
three
probably
a
weekend,
try
to
add
more
thoughts
from
other
editors.
What
they
think
at
this
point
of
time
or
do
we
need
to
have
any
other
discussion
thread.
B
Hoping
this
is
a
good
point
to
maybe
move
on
to
the
next
item
in
the
essence
of
time,
just
wanted
to
make
sure
a
vector.
Are
you
comfortable
with
the
discussion
we
had
today
and
yeah.
E
We
look
forward
to
yeah
I,
have
no
discussions
either
I
want
to
support,
or
on
some.
B
Other
calls
what
event.
Thank
you
everyone.
So
the
next
sub
item
here
mentioned
is
EAP
number
allocation.
We
have
very
well
aware
that
EAP
number
allocation
is
on
EAP
editors.
They
can
allocate
numbers,
we
saw
some
cases
of
the
spotting
numbers
and
trying
to
snip
a
number
which
is
not
the
right
thing
to
do
and
the
process
there
was
not
right,
so
I
I,
totally
understand,
punishing
number
grabbing
ideas
or
opportunities
and
allocating
them
a
different
number,
but
I
was
wondering
like
in
general.
B
Do
we
need
to
just
remove
the
number
because
I've
came
across
a
case?
Actually,
I
came
across
more
than
one,
but
I
could
find
only
one
and
the
other
one
is
last
number
is
five
five
five.
So
it
was
just
a
good
issue
number
and
it
was
mentioned
that
okay,
this
is
the
condition
number,
so
we
are
just
taking
it
off
of
the
list.
However,
there
was
another
PR
which
was
6000
and
it
seemed
that
author
tried
to
trick.
So
he
was
allocated
at
different
EIP
number.
B
B
I
wanted
to
touch
quickly
touch
on
that
area
as
well
like
this
EAP
number
part
I
may
have
missed
this
thing,
but
do
we
have
a
process
in
place?
I
just
wanted
to
get
to
know
that,
so
we
can
start
sharing
it
with
people
we
have
and
if
anyone's
interested
right
right
now,
we
are
just
saying
that
we
want
a
EIP
number
bot,
but
what
do
we
want
to
have
in
that?
And
what
is
the
process?
Do
we
have
any
thoughts
around
it.
C
B
F
F
I
mean
you
could
just
have
like
an
ens
registry
where
people
can
just
like
buy
it
and
then
proves
they
own
it,
and
that
could
be
how
the
bot,
like
assigns
a
number
an
idea.
The
funding
can
just
go
to
like
grants
or
funding
people's
time,
for
they
spend
on
editing
it.
Just
if
people
want
it
like.
Why
not
let
them
have
it,
but
just
have
a
better
like
a
more
Fair
Way
Fair
Way
of
allocating
that.
D
D
F
D
B
A
C
Only
implementation,
we're
considering
for
the
IP
number
bot
is
in
the
commit
where
it's
merged,
that's
where
the
number
is
assigned
like
the
first
draft,
is
merged.
That's
where
the
numbers
assigned.
D
F
D
A
D
A
C
D
C
D
C
D
Go
random
then
yeah,
we're
like
pretty
in
a
pretty
adversarial
mindset.
B
D
D
B
B
B
C
D
B
B
All
right,
I
think
that's
all
the
time
we
had
I
just
quickly
want
to
mention
one
other
thing:
the
EIP
is
inside.com
website.
Actually
it
is
eits.
Inside.Com
website
is
active
right
now.
It
shows
the
latest
month
information
I'm,
going
to
quickly
share
here
the
link
right
now
it
is
showing
the
list
of
proposals
in
draft
final
review
last
call
and
stagnant
total
number
of
proposals,
and
if
we
click
into
this
proposals,
we
will
get
to
know
the
name
and
description
plus
the
pull
request
number.
B
It
is
basically
an
automation
of
the
hack
into
file
that
I
was
sharing
earlier
every
month,
but
this
seems
to
be
more
automated
process
and
I
think
it
is
more
reliable
than
the
happening
because,
secondly,
I
don't
do
it
every
day,
but
this
is
done
by
bot.
So
hopefully
this
will
help.
I
would
be
curious
to
hear
more
thoughts,
not
in
this
call,
obviously
people
if
they
would
like
to
see
some
other
stats
related
to
EIP.
B
We
can
probably
add
that
so
yeah
to
let
us
know
if
there
are
any
other
feature
that
you
would
like
to
be
added
Sam
already
shared
a
few
and
we
have
listed
it
here.
Hopefully
we
can
start
looking
into.
B
That
is
the
right
eye
candy.
So
here
we
have
added
a
code,
new
properties
to
be
added
to
this
website.
If
there
are
any
thoughts
on
this
or
any
new
thing
that
can
be
added
to
make
it
better,
the.
A
B
Right
now
we
can
collect
it
on
DM,
but
definitely
I
will
start.
I
will
start
a
form
Google
form
in
which
people
can
add
their
feedback
and
I.
Think
this
website
contains
that
thing
contact
us
there.
People
can
message.