►
From YouTube: EIPIP meeting 26
Description
Agenda: https://github.com/ethereum-cat-herders/EIPIP/issues/50
A
The
first
item
that
we
would
like
to
discuss
today
is
update
on
contracting
out
to
someone
to
move
the
bot
to
github
actions.
In
the
last
meeting
it
was
discussed
that
we
should
discuss
it
with
the
cat
hurdles
to
look
out
for
the
funds
that
we
we
estimated
in
the
previous
meeting.
A
B
B
A
Okay,
so
the
next
item
is
a
single
source
of
truth
for
eip.
Brent
alsop
has
been
working
on
this
so
brent.
If
you
would
like
to
go
ahead
and
share
some
details
on
it,.
A
C
That
seems
to
be
the
descriptive
table
of
contents
for
all
the
information
anyone
could
want
about
about
ether
and
and
one
of
the
links
down
at
the
bottom
here
is
you
have
where
all
the
ethereum
improvement
proposals
which
takes
you
over
to
this
sub
link
here
and
this
sub
link
here
has
some
interesting
information,
some
of
it's
kind
of
old
and
outdated,
but
but
anyway,
the
bottom
line
is,
is:
is
this
link
here?
C
You
have
the
link
to
this
page
here
and
you
have
the
home
that
goes
back
to
the
home
page
and
and
so
that
kind
of
links
this
into
this
official
top
level
ether
page.
But
the
problem
is,
is
there's
the
real
information
that
everyone
wants
is
over
here
on
the
eips
ethereum.org,
and
it's
all
this
stuff
up
here.
Lincoln
and
so
there's
almost
no
links
to
this
kind
of
more
official
appearing
one
with
everyone
links
to
this
one.
C
C
So
that's
kind
of
one
of
my
first
proposals
is
and
since
there's
very
few
links
to
this
page
over
here
in
the
eips,
then
I
think
we
should
move
these
and
have
a
goal
of
eventually
making
this
one
a
redirect
page
that
redirects
over
to
eips
and
and
and
so
so,
but
before
we
make
that
a
redirect.
We
need
to
move
clean
them
up,
especially
this
one
over
here,
because
I
think
this
one
here
should
also
like
this
one.
Here
it
has
this
home
and
ethereum.
C
I
think
we
should
have
this
kind
of
layout
so
over
here
we
should
propose
putting
a
home
here
that
links
back
to
the
ethereum
dot
home
page
and
also
do
this
kind
of
icon
in
indication
up
here
and
and
and
decorate
the
page
kind
of
like
this
and
and
then
also
on
this
clean
up
here.
C
We've
got
these
two
things
here:
eip
status
and
eip
types
both
of
those
are
old
and
duplicate
and
out
of
date,
so
another
proposal
I
would
have
to
clean
up
this
page
in
addition
to
having
the
home
link
and
the
icon
up
here
is
to,
I
can
have
jim,
and
I
rewrite
a
paragraph
instead
of
having
all
this
to
just
describe
what,
because
all
of
the
canonical
source
of
this
information
is,
my
understanding
is,
is
eip1
right.
All
of
this
is
defined
in
the
ip1
and
it's
all
updated
from
this
right.
B
C
C
Right,
so
I
would
want
to
replace
these
two
sections
here
with
just
description
of
what
eip1
and
eip
includes
this,
and
it
includes
this
and
up
and
these-
and
these
are
all
out
of
date,
and
also
it
includes
this
out
of
date.
This
is
back
over
to
the
eips
one.
This.
This
is
an
old
out
of
date
list,
which
is
also
on
eip1,
so
basically
over
here
replace
this,
which
is
the
description
of
what
eip1
and
the
eip1
has
a
pointing
that
says.
C
Eip1
has
all
the
canonical
information
of
this,
and
and
all
that
would
be,
and
then
another
interesting
thing
that's
over
here
is
there's
this
and
again
participating
stuff
is
over
on
eip1,
and
there
was
some
history
stuff
over
here.
C
Oh
yes,
some
of
this
history,
but
not
this
list
here,
because
that's
in
eip1
but
but
put
some
of
this
history
and
move
it
over
to
here
and
then
once
we
had
so
the
home
here
and
this
here
and
this
cleaned
up
that
way,
I
would
propose
that
we'd
do
all
that
to
this
page
here
and
then,
once
that's
done,
we
could
work
on
getting
this
one
redirected
over
to
there.
So
does
that
sound?
That's
kind
of
my
summary
of
the
first
thing
I
think
we
should
work
towards.
B
What
is
the
argument
for
removing
those
two
sections
yeah
from
this
page
and
moving
them
into
eip1
versus
just
moving
eip1
into
this
page.
C
Oh
okay,
yeah.
I
didn't
consider
that
I
I
just
know
that
we
made
those
changes
into
eip
eip1.
So
I
figured
that
and
those
have
the
update
and
so
so
yeah-
that's
a
good
price
about
that.
But
maybe
that
would
be
a
better
place.
B
Eip1
is
definitely
the
most
up-to-date.
It's
like
the
actually
maintained
one.
However,
I
personally,
I
don't
know
how
other
people
feel
I
personally
do
not
have
a
problem
with
just
ditching
eip1
and
just
updating
this
instead,
and
so
this
would.
B
B
C
B
Oh,
it
definitely
is,
there
will
be
people
who
will
be
confused
by
such
a
change,
and
there
may
be
people
who
push
back
on
it,
because
tradition
and
status
quo
is
hard
to
fight
against.
B
C
I
wonder
if
we
should
tell
you
something
on
eip1,
for
example,
let
me
pull
up
the
ip1
real
quick.
There
is
that
you.
B
Over
here,
yeah
that
one
under
contributing
you
got
first
review
afp.
One
oh
yeah,
that
one
oh
this
one
here.
C
C
C
That
says
we're
going
to
move
all
this
information
over
to
here
and
ask
and
would
anyone
mind
if,
if
I
created
a
feedback
form
petition
on
canonizer,
where
anyone
that
didn't
like
that
could
create
a
competing
camp
and
say
why
they
didn't
like
it
and
and
then
we
could
and
if
and
if
we
had
a
a
certain
amount
of
that
would
give
us
an
ability,
so
people
who
did
like
that
could
say.
Yes,
I
like
that,
and
people
who
didn't
like
it
could
join
a
competing
camp
say
they
don't
want
to
do
that.
C
B
C
C
Right
but
at
least
they
would
have
if
they
wanted
to
provide
feedback,
they
would
yeah
that
might
be
a
barrier
to
that,
but
but
anyway
yeah,
but
they
could,
if
they
wanted
to,
and
they
could
use
their
github
id
and
go
in
there
and
create
a
camper
or
I
could
help
them
create.
We
could
create
a
camp
to
start
that
so
that
anyone
who
wanted
to
just
express
I
don't
like
this-
could
just
join
the
camp
and
and
and
people
who
did
like
the
idea.
C
D
A
Many
people
outside
this
you
know
core
group
who
are
actually
looking
into
process
improvement
would
be
you
know
interested
in
this
kind
of
change
or
going
and
adding
feedback
there.
So
that's
just
my
fear.
I
don't
know.
C
Okay,
so
so
because
I've
already
got
this
google
doc
here-
that's
describing
a
lot
of
the
stuff
I'm
talking
about
here,
but
I
could
clean
that
up
and
specifically
put
a
point
at
the
top
that
mentions
that.
So,
if
anyone
and
and
then
I,
then
we
could
submit
a
change
to
eip1
that
points.
The
google
doc
where
the
proposal
is
being
made
and
people
could
make
some
feedback
in
google
doc.
Would
that
be
easier.
A
My
my
suggestion
here
would
be
like
if
we
can
get
a
list
of
like
what
what
has
to
be
removed
from
which
document
a
set
of
that
and
what
needs
to
be
added
or
moved
to
the
new
document.
If
you
can
just
clearly
okay
those
things,
then
we
can
discuss
that.
One
thing
that
I
don't
I'm
not
sure
if
I
see
in
the
screen
sharing
today
we
discussed
about,
is
the
readme
dot
md
at
ethereum,
slash
eip's,
github
repo.
C
Yeah,
that's
in
let's
see
is
that
yeah
open
link,
new
tab,
that's
or
that
yeah.
That's
it!
That's
this
one
right
here!
This
is
it.
This
is
the
reason.
No,
that's
not
vips
open
link
the
readme.
Oh!
This
is
the
oh.
This
is
the
issues
the
the
yeah,
the
the
yeah
there's.
This
is
what
you're
talking
about
here
right.
This
is
the
read
me
so
over
here.
So
I'm
sorry.
What
was
your
question
again.
A
So
are
we
considering
this
here
as
well,
because
you
see
the
draft
last
call
accepted?
These
things
are
not
correct,
like
for
accepted.
C
C
I
would
think
we
would
want
to
clean
that
up
and
basically
put
links
to
if
you
want
to
find
that
information
then
come
over
to
this
page
here,
which
is
eips.ethereum.org,
which
is
the
definition
the
canonical
specification
of
everything
yeah.
C
B
So
that's
the
page,
that's
you
were
looking
at
that.
B
This
whole
site,
this
whole
site,
keep
mine.
This
whole
site
is
built
by
jekyll.
I
believe,
and
so
this
is
the
content
for
that
page.
There's
also.
This
page
also
has
like
a
footer
and
a
header,
and
if
you
go
up
a
directory
in
that
repository,
I
believe
there's
here
layouts,
I
think,
or
something
includes
I
don't
know
anyway,
you
might
have
to
dig
a
little
bit.
So
if
you're,
trying
to
edit
like
the
page
layout,
it's
different
than
editing
content.
B
C
Here
I'll
look
into
that
more
so,
okay
cool,
I
think
I
know
which
direction
to
push
I'll
work
on
that
and
I'll
keep
you
guys
informed
before
I
do
anything
like
do
a
pull
request,
I'll
I'll,
possibly
do
a
pull
request
on
my
own
copy
of
the
repository
and
point
you
guys
to
it.
If
you
want
to
review
it
before
I
and
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
so.
A
So
yeah,
maybe
maybe
the
first
step,
would
be
you
know
just
list
it
out
and
share
that
document
and
eventually
maybe
we
can
just
talk
about
it
in
the
next
meeting
or
the
list,
and
if
that
is
that
seems
fine
to
everybody,
you
can
go
ahead
and
make
full
requests
for
that.
C
A
A
So,
moving
on
to
the
next
item,
it's
eip
status
change.
We
have
created
a
pull
request
for
all
the
eips
which
are
for
berlin,
mostly,
I
think
just
one.
We
just
left
out
one
to
update
it
and
I
believe
they
have
got
accepted
now
they
are
in
review
status
and
we
will
continue
making
pull
requests
as
we
come
across
new
proposals
which
are
not
in
the
right
status.
A
A
A
A
With
few
discussions
he
has
tried
to
list
some
of
the
points
that
the
group
agreed
upon.
I
received
this
blog
just
last
night,
so
if
it
is
fine
and
no
further
improvement
is
required,
we
can
go
ahead
and
publish
this
sharing
it
for
any
further
feedback.
If
people.
B
A
No,
I
I
couldn't
read
it
like.
It
was
middle
of
the
night
and
since
morning
I
wasn't
meeting
so
I
could
not.
B
A
Okay,
so
the
last
item
I
see
here
is
review
action
items
from
the
previous
meeting.
A
It's
I
have
updated
the
link,
as
shane
mentioned,
that
it
was
pointing
towards
the
older
one,
although
he
has
listed
out
the
action
item.
Thank
you
shane
for
that
confirm
with
sam
at
ethereum.org.
Whether
the
intention
to
have
is
ethereum
points
to
the
at
one
spec
or
vice
versa.
A
A
Next
item
also
is
with
james
work
out
on
the
content.
Part
we'll
wait
for
him
to
report.
If
there
is
any
progress,
action,
25.3
cat
hurt
is
to
consider
eip
information
for
ethereum.org
site,
so
we,
yes,
we
are
having
some
internal
discussion
and
at
present
we
are
looking
for
upgrading
our
ethereum
cathedral's
website.
A
Some
of
the
contents
are
splitting
into
that,
and
some
will
be
going
on
the
ethereum.org
cell.
I
think
a
little
more
discussion
is
needed
and
hopefully,
by
next
week
we
will
have
clarity
on
whether
or
not
to
go
on
that.
But
coming
back
to
brent's
proposal
like
he
had
some
suggestions
about
ethereum.org
eip,
we
were
initially
planning
to
put
content
over
there.
But
if
that
has
to
be
moved,
then
we
might
have
to
rethink
about
how
how
to
proceed
with
this
particular
action
item.
E
I
think
cat
heard
his
website
would
link
to
wherever
that
information
ends
up
being.
A
So
I
was
trying
to
mention
here
like
initially
when
we
were
thinking
of
sharing
some
information
of
eips
with
the
ethereum
dot
org
site.
That
was
on
that
particular
page
that
brent
shared
in
the
screen
today,
ethereum
eips.
A
The
next
item
is
brent
to
continue
the
investigation
into
sources
from
of
eip
information
apprentice.
Working
on
that-
and
I
think
today
we
made
good
progress.
We
have
some
clarity
on
what
to
go
where
and
eventually
he
would
create
simple
request
to
do
the
cleanup.
Thank
you
for
that
and
last
action
is
cat
herders
to
progress
eip
status
cleanup.
A
Yes,
we
are
working
on
that.
We
are
trying
to
reach
different
authors
of
for
not
only
for
core
proposals,
but
also
for
ercs
and
interfaces
and
trying
to
create
pull
requests
to
change
the
status,
to
bring
it
up
to
the
like
most
suitable
one.
For
the
moment.
B
F
Are
those
approaching
the
I
forgot.
F
Okay,
I
mean
I
I
kind
of
had
I
think
I
have
some
pr's
out
for
him,
but
I've
been
waiting
for
alex
berazazi
to
approve
them,
as
he
was
the
author
so
yeah.
I
think
those
who.
F
Okay,
I'll
probably
circle
back
to
him
and
see
it
was
more
something
I
wanted
to
do,
because
I
knew
he
was
busy,
but
I
did
need
to
get
like
his
approval
to
change
the
things
so
I'll
take
a
look
at
it.
Yeah.
B
A
Okay,
I
think
I
I
may
have
a
question
for
if
you
know
I
don't
know
if
this
is
appropriate,
to
bring
it
here.
It's
related
to
coder
meeting,
but
I'm
just
curious
to
know
about
eip248.
When
are
we
still
proceeding
with
its
standardization
process?.
A
B
F
B
It
is
being
implemented,
so
I
think
review
is
the
proper
status
for
it.
There
was
some
disagreements
and
debate,
but
I
believe
that's
one
side
caved
and
so
that
debate
is
over.
B
A
Okay,
that
makes
sense
yeah,
that's
all
from
the
agenda
today
for
future
meetings.
I'm
wondering
like
do
we
want
to
just
stick
to
the
eips
erp
and
ap1,
or
do
we
want
to
start
considering
some
other
discussions
for
the
process
improvement
in
general.
A
Okay,
like
so
far
when
we
started
the
cipip
group,
we
started
discussing
about
the
process
that
was
kind
of
messier,
maybe
not
having
clarity
on
the
eip1
side
or
the
network
upgrade
and
standardization
side.
So
now
we
have
got
some
clarity
on
that
part.
I
was
wondering
what
kind
of
issues
that
we
can
consider
here
for
future
meetings
like?
Is
it
okay
to
consider
something
related
to
any
clients,
a
particular
you
know
process
part
or
do
we
want
to
keep
it
separated.
B
B
We
are
finally
caught
up
on
vr,
so
so
that
is
good.
We
are
down
to
22
and
they
all
are
actually
active
things,
but
I
would
be
hesitant
to
expand
our
scope
just
because,
like
we
don't
like
our
staffing
issues
are
still
present.
B
I
think
actually,
all
of
the
things
I
want
to
discuss
I
got
through
by
default.
Despite
my
arguments,
I
don't
want
to
win
by
default.
I
won
by
people
nonetheless
by
just
creating
prs
against
eip1
waiting
for
like
two
months
for
no
one
to
say
no
to
them,
and
then
I
merge
them
so
that
process
has
been
working.
For
me,
it'd
be
great
if
we
had
more
people
than
just
being
like
my
reviewing,
but
you
know
it
does
allow
us
to
make
progress.
We
have
making
progress.
I
think.
C
A
Hi
james,
so
we
were
like
very
close
to
the
end
of
the
meeting
now
that
you
have
joined,
so
we
would
quickly
want
to
check
with
you
if
you
have
any
thoughts
on
the
agenda
items
or
anything
in
particular,
you
would
want
to
discuss
from
the
previous
meeting
on
like
what
we
were
discussing
about
what
to
go
on
at
one
of
our
spec
repository,
sorry
for
putting
you
on.
A
G
I
was
on
mute
looking
reading
the
reading
the
thing.
No,
I
I'll
just
go
back
and
watch
the
rest
of
this
and
apologize
for
being
late.
A
A
That
was
just
the
number
one
json
rpc
network
upgrade
and
eip
content.
The
item
number
one
that
we
are
planning
to
add
on
f1
or
spec
repository.
G
I
could
give
some
update
on
that.
The
json
rpc,
so
I
haven't,
talked
with
thomas
about
it,
but
I
did
notice
that
oasis
has
their
own
repo
for
it.
G
B
So
I
just
just
got
off
of
the
jason
rpc
call
for
the
week
and
it
sounds
like
they.
They
think
that
they
that
you
all
want
them
to
put
the
json
rpc
spec
on
ethereum.org,
and
so
that
was
the
that's
where
they're
at.
B
And
so
someone
indicated
that
at
least
the
section
of
ethereum.work
that
they're
planning
is
on
github
and
can
be
pr.
A
B
G
Yeah
yeah
yeah,
that's
all
right
is
thomas
still
the
best
person
to
ask
him
to
talk
about
that.
Would
you
would
you
say.
G
B
Oh
yeah,
you
should
definitely
talk
to
him
if,
if
you
guys
are
trying
to
avoid
putting
on
ethereum.org
because
you
don't
want
like
ownership
in
indications,
then
definitely
talk
because
I
don't
think
that's
the
impression
he
got.
A
On
that
I
have
a
question
about
this
eip1474.
So
how
do
we
see
this
proposal?
Do
we
want
to
proceed
with
its
standardization
process?
I'm
asking
because
I'm
considering
this
for
people,
I
think
it's
it's.
It
would
be
valuable
to
get
people
attention
if
we
are
really
considering
it
for.
B
So,
on
the
one
hand,
I
think
it's
a
sorry
eip1474
is
the
someone
basically
wrote
the
json
rpc
spec
as
an
eip,
it's
giant.
On
the
one
hand,
I
think
it's
a
good
start
to
specifying
jason
rpc.
On
the
other
hand,
I
mean
the
whole
reason
thomas
put
together.
B
This
whole
thing
was
because
it's
not
specific
enough,
and
I
think
we
should
just
make
sure
that
actually,
I
think
both
the
authors
of
that
are
part
of
a
message
group,
and
so
I
would
just
say:
let
them
figure
out
what
they're
gonna
do
and
then,
maybe
in
a
month
once
they
have,
you
know
some
major
makes
the
progress
ask
them
if
they
want
to
just
move
this
to
withdrawn
or
not
because
that's
my
gut.
B
A
So
I
was
talking
to
get
implemented
of
this
proposal
and
the
author,
and
they
suggested
that
some
of
the
wallets
are
interested
into.
You
know
adoption
of
this,
so
maybe
with
that,
if
we
can
arrange
a
call
or
something.
A
A
A
So
yeah,
that's
all
for
today's
call.
The
next
meeting
is
on
february
24th,
two
weeks
from.