►
From YouTube: EIPIP meeting #21
Description
Agenda: https://github.com/ethereum-cat-herders/EIPIP/issues/39
A
Okay,
so
we
can
go
ahead
and
get
started.
This
is
eip
ip
meeting
number
21..
The
first
agenda
item
is
single
source
of
truth
for
eip.
What's
that
agenda
item
referring
to.
B
That
is
coming
from
the
previous
discussion.
I
do
not
see
brent
here
on
the
call,
but
that
was
something
related
to
making
one
source
of
you
know.
Information
like
at
this
time.
We
have
like
multiple
resources
for
getting
information
on
eip.
One
is
eips.ethereum.org,
another
one
is
ethereum,
dot,
org
slash
eip,
and
then
we
have
readme.
Then
we
have
eip1.
B
C
Have
anything
specific
other
than
what
you
said
that
we
have
four
things
that
all
describe
the
ap
process
and
they'll?
Describe
it
a
little
bit
differently
and
they'll?
Describe
it
a
little
bit
wrong
because
they're,
not
in
sync,
and
so
each
one
is
out
of
date
in
its
own
way.
It
would
be
nice
if
we
didn't
have
that
problem.
A
C
Yes,
it
should,
but
it's
for
reasons
of
history.
It
currently
contains
a
bunch
of
overlap
with
them.
Just
in
terms
of
what
content
it
does
contain,
and
so
the
idea
was
that
we
would
clearly
delineate
what
should
be
in
the
readme
versus
what
should
be
in
the
ip1
and
then
once
we
have
that
line
drawn.
We
can
then
delete
all
the
stuff
from
the
readme
that
should
be
in
the
ip1
and
vice
versa,
and
then
those
two
are
at
least
now
in
sync,
but
then
we
still
have
the
other
problem
of.
C
A
A
Okay,
the
second
agenda
item
are
edson's
comments.
They
are
somewhat.
Some
of
them
are
related
edson.
Do
you
want
to
just
go
over
them
and
we
can
talk
about
each
one.
We've
talked
about
a
lot
of
these
before,
but
if
people
have
new
commentary
or
updates
on
some
of
these,
I
think
that
would
be
good
and
I
wasn't
here
for
the
entire
last
one.
So
if
there
was
stuff
that
happened
last
time,
I'm
probably
a
little
out
of
the
loop,
I
should
have
read
the
notes.
My
bad.
D
Sure
I
can
go
ahead,
so
the
first
one
is
talking.
Are
you
on
board
more
eap,
editors.
A
I
think
paying
them
would
help
and
I'm-
and
I
am
talking
to
or
kind
of
help
thinking
about
how
to
do
that.
I'm
not
talking
to
anyone
specifically
who
can
pay
us
yet,
but
and
even
then
I
I
think
it
would
be
more
prioritizing
people
who
aren't
getting
paid
for
anything
right
now,
except
for
eip
or
they're
doing
mostly
eip
editing
and
that's
like
their
primary
thing
or
something
they
spend
a
significant
amount
of
hours
on
getting
paid
hourly
or
something
like
that.
A
I
think,
would
be
nice
so
like
I
wouldn't
want
to
get
paid
for
that,
but
maybe
greg
or
micah
or
other
active
people
would.
A
Yeah,
I
think
that's
that's
a
good
idea
to
ask
him
about
that.
Micah
did
you
have
an
opinion
on
that?
Is
that
something
like
if
there
was
an
opportunity
to
get
paid
for
this?
Would
you
accept
that?
Maybe
yes,
if
someone
gives
me
money
for
something
I'm
doing
anyways,
then
I
will
accept
said
money
great
I'm.
I
would
be
in
the
same
boat
as
you
except
I,
since
the
ef
is
kind
of
like.
A
A
I
think
that's
just
something.
That's
just
gonna
happen
over
the
next
couple
of
eipip
meetings,
and
maybe
we
should
have
like
a
2021
push
to
recruit
editors
once
we
find
funding
source
and
look
for
a
funding
source.
I
think
malloc
dao
would
be
a
good
place
for
that
right.
Now,
like
no
one's
submitting
stuff
to
malakdow
and
everything
that's
getting
submitted
is
getting
passed
like
the
very
few
things
that
are
getting
submitted.
C
A
Away
kinda
yeah,
I
mean
like
originally,
it
was
really
focused
on
or
it
was
focused
on
a
lot
of
like
non-core
protocol
like
privacy,
stuff,
like
tornado
cache
and
but
then
it
would
like
range
to
other
things
too.
So
it
kind
of
as
time
went
on
it
didn't
really.
No
one
really
picked
up
the
torch
to
adjust
it
for
what
it
needed
to
be
today
is
what
I'd
say,
but
right
now,
there's
someone
named
yalda.
Who
is
starting
to
do
that?
A
So
there
is
hope
that
maybe
it
could
start
speeding
up
again
and
kind
of
becoming
a
new
force,
but
they
have
like
a
million
dollars
in
their
fund.
So
I
don't
think
it'd
be
crazy
to
try
to
use
molok
dao
for
that,
and
we
could
do
that
as
early
as
you
know,
early
december.
B
So
one
thing
I
was
wondering
like:
while
we
are
figuring
out
like
about
this
budget
thing
and
all,
but
the
one
burning
problem
we
have
is
a
lot
of
issues
and
less
additives.
I
I
was
wondering
if
we
can
have
somebody
who
is
already
looking
into
it.
Like
I
mean
in
my
mind,
like
client
was
there
and
it
was
earlier
proposed
as
well.
He
has
been
actively
looking
into
that.
A
Yeah,
if
someone
like,
like
clients,
interested
and
even
taking
any
amount
of
responsibility
in
this
I'd,
be
all
for
giving
the
pro
like
right
permissions
for
the
repo
for
people,
that
we
trust
even
doing
small
tasks
and
maybe
not
wanting
if
they
don't,
if,
regardless
of
if
they
want
to
be
called
an
eip,
editor
or
not.
We
can
kind
of
work
that
part
out,
but
my
viewpoint
is:
if
anyone
wants
to
help
there
shouldn't
be
a
hurdle
in
doing
that
for
bureaucratic
reasons.
As
long
as
we
trust
them.
E
I'd
be
happy
to
help
out.
I
don't
know
if
you
think
it
would
be
valuable
for
me
to
like
go
through
this
onboarding
process,
like
I'm
pretty
familiar
with
how
things
are
going
as
it
is
because
I've
been
going
to
all
these
calls
for
the
last
six
eight
months
and
I've
been
involved
in
the
process.
But
maybe,
if
we're
going
to
look
at
even
hiring
more
editors
in
the
future
in
the
very
near
future,
maybe
it
would
be
beneficial
for
us
to
do
like
a
dry
run
with
me
through
this
like
on-boarding
process.
E
A
A
A
A
And
I
mean
I
guess
I
can't
confirm
it.
So
I
talk
to
the
other
editors,
but
I
doubt
there
will
be
anyone
who
says
no
okay,
brent
just
showed
up.
So
if
we
want,
we
can
go
back
to
his
agenda
item
real
quick
just
in
case
there's
an
update
on
that.
F
A
Problem,
it's
the
one
that
says
single
source
of
truth
for
eip,
so
that
would
be
having
something
that
accurately
describes
each
or
basically
having
each
eip1
the
readme,
the
wiki
and
eips.ethereum.org,
having
their
purpose
well-defined
and
the
text
with
them
well
defined
and
different
from
the
others.
F
Yeah
mike
appointed
me
to
one
of
the
guys,
that's
working
on
that,
and
so
I'm
coordinating
with
him
and
we
we've
opened
a
conversation,
but
there's
still
more
work
to
do
on
that.
I'm
still
work
in
progress.
Okay,
great
thanks.
A
For
the
update
edson,
we
can
go
back
to
what
you're
saying,
but
to
summarize
the
first
point,
basically,
funding
is
a
good
idea
and
we
have
malik
dao
as
a
potential
option
and
light
client
is
now
probably
an
editor.
D
Okay,
great,
should
we
run
to
the
next
question,
or
should
we
yeah.
A
I
don't
think
it's
our
responsibility
to
really
push
that.
I
think
if
you
want
to
be
an
eip
champion
well,
the
one
thing
is
that
it
might
be
the
responsibility
of
people
who
are
helping
to
re-factor.
The
eip
process
is
clearly
defining
what
an
eip
champion
is,
so
that
people
understand
the
roles
and
responsibilities
and
then
having
people
champion
when
they
want
to
champion.
I
don't
think
we
should
be
saying:
hey
you.
Can
you
champion
this?
That's
a
little
bit
out
of
scope.
I
think
we
should
just
let
it
be.
E
I
feel
like
one
way
that
we
could
help
improve.
That
process.
Is
this
kind
of
goes
back
to?
What
I
was
thinking
about
this
summer
was
some
way
of
having
like
informal
working
groups
and
maybe
doesn't
even
need
to
be
that
overbearing.
It
could
just
be
some
people
who
have
a
lot
of
experience
in
specific
eip
areas.
E
Like
I
you
know,
I
think,
like
alex
berasozzi,
is
like
a
good
person
from
like
the
core
side
in
a
lot
of
ways
saying
with
peter
sology
and
and
martin,
and
these
are
sorts
of
people
that
could
see
like
a
core
eve
come
through
and
if
it's
not
so
that
they
have
the
ability
to
push
for
themselves,
they
could
say
this
is
something
that
is
probably
going
to
become
finalized.
It
just
needs
to
have
that
champion
to
go
through,
and
I
think
this
happened
very
organically.
E
A
Okay,
I'm
gonna
have
to
think
about
that
more
before
forming
a
full
opinion.
C
So
right
now
we
have
many
eips
that
are
all
but
done
as
as
just
described,
but
just
have
been
dropped
and
part
of
the
problem
is:
is
that
only
the
author
can
edit
it,
and
so
I
think,
if
we
just
kind
of
make
people
aware
that
hey
it's
okay
to
just
copy
the
eip,
put
your
own
author
on
it
change
the
eip
id.
You
can
now
champion
that,
like
you,
don't
need
to
if
the
other,
the
original
author
isn't
moving
forward
and
you
want
to,
you-
can
take
it
over
and
that's
okay.
C
C
A
C
B
Yeah
sure
that
is
a
good
suggestion.
We
can
definitely
mention
that
in
our
newsletter
on
the
people
series
that
we
talk
to
different
authors,.
F
One
other
possibility,
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
the
right
idea,
but
forking
is
always
problematic,
because
then
you
lose
the
single
source
of
truth.
You
lose
history
and
it
seems
like
another
possibility
would
just
if,
if
someone's
not
active
on
an
eip,
if
someone
proposes
a
change
and
then
they're
silenced
silent
implies
consent.
So
and
then,
if
they
come
in
later
and
say,
we
miss
something
they
can
pull
us
back,
but
anyway,
that's
my
feeling,
yeah.
I
don't
like.
E
It
does
seem
like
it's
a.
It
is
important
messaging
problem
rather
than
concrete
actions,
something
that
just
needs
to
be
continually
said
until
it
kind
of
like
permeates
throughout
the
community.
C
E
I
feel
like
it's
sport,
you
know
to
me
the
the
outcome
that
we're
kind
of
hoping
for-
I
guess
not
really
hoping
for,
but
the
outcome
that
makes
it
sane
to
work
in
ethereum
is
that
unless
we
have
a
concrete
agreement
among
people,
we
won't
move
things
forward,
and
so
it's
different
at
terms
in
the
terms
of
editors,
pushing
things
through
and
finalizing
standards.
F
E
I
think
that
that's
you
know
the
you
know
less
than
one
percent
of
the
time
and
the
other
99
of
the
time
we
get
to
have
people
come
in
and
start
championing.
Eeps.
I
guess
like
one
of
the
problems
is
that
maybe
they
could
leave
this
like
path
of
destruction
behind
them,
where
they,
you
know,
change
each
and
then
they
also
don't
take
it
to
the
finish
line.
A
Yeah,
I
don't
really
have
an
opinion
right
now
on
that
yeah
on
micah's
question.
Specifically,
I
don't
have
an
opinion
right
now.
E
A
I
I
don't
think
that
that's
also
something
that's
going
to
happen.
Often
I
think
the
most
times
an
eep
would
fork
would
be
three
and
that's
rare,
because
the
first
time
it
would
be
like.
Oh,
this
eep
didn't
get
much
traction.
Let
me
try
and
then
it
would
have
to
then
the
author
would
have
to
abandon
the
new
author
would
have
to
then
abandon
it,
and
that
would
be
the
second
abandonment
and
then
it
would
happen
a
third
time
and
by
the
third
time
there
would
be
a
trail
of
people
not
wanting
it.
A
E
C
That's
true
also,
we
do
have.
We
do
have
the
ability
we
do
have
the
thing
in
the
that
we
just
introduced
where
we
actually
are
marking
eaves
as
abandoned
eventually,
and
so
that
I
think,
will
hopefully
help
reduce
the
frequency
with
which
we
see
like
many
copies
that
are
in
some
sort
of
state
that
is
under,
like
anything
other
than
abandon,
and
you
can
just
ignore
the
abandoned
ones
or
the
withdrawn
whatever
we
decided
to
call
it
so.
E
If,
if
an
eve
is
abandoned,
do
do
we
should
we
assume
that
it
should
be?
If
someone
wants
to
work
on
that,
should
we
say
that
if
the
champion
is
no
longer
around
to
really
respond
to
anything,
should
they
copy
that
even
create
a
new
one
or
because
it's
abandoned?
Is
it
okay
for
us
to
say?
Okay,
because
it
was
abandoned,
the
champion
didn't
care
to
get
into
a
place
that
mattered
and
so
we're
going
to
allow
them
to
like
become
champions
of
it.
C
I
believe
we
when,
in
this
previous
discussion,
we
agreed
that
it
would
you'd
have
to
create
a
new
one.
So
that
way
we
don't
have
to
deal
with
the
problem
of
politics
and
people
like
saying.
Oh,
I
banned
that
on
purpose,
because
I
don't
think
it's
a
good
idea
and
I
don't
want
my
name
attached
to
it.
I
don't
want
my
history
and
I
think,
there's
there's
a
fear
of
like
this
can
get
complicated,
whereas
if
we
just
say
hey,
if
you
see
an
abandoned
eep
that
you
like
fork
it
like
that's
much
simpler.
C
C
Abandoned
eats
eeps
can
be
unabandoned
by
their
authors
and
so
that's
another
layer
of
complication.
If
we
allow
someone
to
take
it
over
like
it
gets
abandoned
and
the
person
comes
back
and
they're
like
oh,
I
want
to
resume
this
after
all
and
then
but
someone
else
started
taking
it
over,
and
so
we
tell
them
to
fork
like
it
gets
weird.
F
If
you
take
a
petition
model
that
that
may
not
make
mistake,
make
sense
here,
but
in
canonizer
people
can
explicitly
sign
a
camp
and
join
a
camp,
but
they
can
also
leave
the
camp
anytime.
They
want,
and
so
so
to
me
it's
it's,
not
a
governance
problem,
political
problem,
just
a
communication
problem.
How
can
that
person
either
leave
his
name
on
or
remove
his
name
off
the
camp
so
anyway,.
A
A
I
think
the
other
thing
like
client
that
I
would
say
is
if
we,
if
we're
doing
it
kind
of
the
way
it
already
is
where
we
just
fork
the
eip
and
it
turns
out,
there
starts
to
be
a
problem
we
can.
We
can,
you
can
propose
a
change
or
anyone
can
propose
a
change
to
the
process,
but
I
don't
think
there's
a
better
process,
that's
or
I
think,
there's
a
better
balance
of
process
right
now
that
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
predict
things
already.
E
Yeah,
that
makes
sense
are
people
okay.
If
we
say
that
the
official
messaging
is
that
people
should
fork
and
eep
if
they
want
to
go
ahead
and
work
on
it,
and
the
informal
messaging
is
that
people
should
make
an
effort
if
they
want
to
work
on
you
to
try
and
reach
out
to
the
original
author
and
try
to
take
over
that
eep.
If
possible.
C
I
think
that
also
aligns
with
open
source
software
kind
of
etiquette,
where
generally
people
first
try
to
go
and
propose
a
change
or
a
pr
or
file
an
issue
with
some
project
and
then,
if
they
don't
get
traction
or
whatever
they
eventually
they'll,
say.
Okay,
I'm
just
going
to
fork
this
and
do
my
own
thing,
yep.
That
makes
sense.
A
C
A
Okay,
next
up,
how
can
we
reduce
the
backlog?
C
A
That's
really
funny,
okay,
so
I
think
having
more
editors
will
reduce
backlog
and
that's
really
the
only
real
solution.
E
C
We
are
getting
down
like
we
were
at,
I
don't
know,
10
pages
of
backlogged.
I
think
we're
down
to
two
or
three
and
the
that's
mostly
due
to
the
bot
like
the
bot,
has
just
been
slowly
working
through
something
keep
in
mind.
The
bot
actually
does
have
a
limit
on
how
many
it
will
flag
at
a
time,
and
so
it's
been
iterating
through
and
as
things
get
closed,
it
then
opens
up
a
slot
where
the
bot
can
then
flag
something
else,
and
so
it's
still
making
progress.
C
I
don't
know
if
it's
reached
the
reach
the
end
or
not
in
its
first
pass
and
then,
of
course,
as
things
get
just
abandoned,
naturally
they're
also
going
away
on
top
of
that
in
since,
whenever
I
started
like
in
july
or
something
mid-july,
I
believe
I
have
been
responding
to
every,
but
I
think
I
have
responded
to
everybody.
It's
like.
C
I
think
that
there
is
no
longer
a
problem
since
july
of
people
submitting
eips
and
getting
no
editor
to
look
at
them,
which
was
a
very
big
problem
previously,
and
so
I'm
my
hope
is,
is
that
between
the
bot
and
me
actually
responding
to
people,
we
will
get
to
a
point
where,
eventually,
all
that's
left
in
the
pull
request
list
are
eips
that
are
actively
being
worked
on.
C
I
think
that,
combined
with
the
automatic
move
to
abandonment,
which
will
kick
in
what
in
a
month
or
something
like
that,
I'm
hoping
that
we
have
done
enough
that
as
long
as
you
keep
up
with
all
that,
we
will
get
down
to
something
that
is
manageable,
manageable
for
one
full-time,
individual,
not
guaranteed,
but
that's
my
hope.
B
Thank
you
so
much
for
that
micah
I
mean
I
personally
have
observed
this
like
a
lot
of
pull.
Requests
are
now
closed
for
whatever
time
like
whenever
we
have
requested,
and
personally
I
have
received
all
the
messages
from
you
getting
response.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
this
hard
work.
A
Great
any
other
comments
on
this.
My
phone,
sorry.
C
A
Write
it
more
as
a
check-in,
but
edson
did
you
have
a
specific
meaning
behind
the
question.
A
Okay,
next
up,
how
can
we
reduce
the
turnaround
time
that
actually
is
like?
I
think
that
kind
of
goes
with
the
previous
one
and
that
that
is
just
more
editors,
micah's,
doing
good,
like
clients
getting
added.
A
A
D
D
A
C
I
would
like
just
separate
repos
for
the
different
categories
personally,
so
I
can
ignore
one
of
them.
A
Really
don't
like
ercs
we've
talked
about
separating
them
before,
and
it
always
has
come
up
how
messy
that
would
be.
And
if
we
want
to
split
it
because
then
there
there
could
be
cause
to
split
it
again
in
the
future,
and
it
would
be
a
precedent
set
that
we
could
between
like
and
then
we
could
split
it
again
for
smart
contract
versus
like
api
standards
versus
other
types
of
ercs.
A
D
You
have
to
create
a
new
naming
or
numbering
standard,
so
right
now
we
have
it
with
issues
and
prs
just
add.
A
Nice
that.
A
B
I
may
have
a
question
so
not
directly
related
to
this
particular
question,
but
somehow,
like
we
are
talking
about
having
different
repositories
and
different
categories
of
that,
so
my
understanding
is.
We
agreed
that
no
more
meta,
no
more
informational
eips
would
be
there,
but
at
least
for
one
eip,
which
I
believe
would
be
going
forward
about
that
serenity
phase
zero.
Would
there
be
any
any
other
place
where
it
will
go
or
if
we
are
just
going
to
get
it
in
the
final
form?
B
B
So
for
review,
section
yeah
that
that
was
the
case
and
we
discussed
that.
Ideally,
it
should
have
been
in
review
two
weeks
back
when
they
actually
added
the
spec.
The
final
respect
for
this
upgrade,
but
since
we
did
not
do
they
did
not
do
it.
Is
it
okay
to
just
skip
this
stage
for
now
and
put
it
in
the
last
call,
because
there
are
only
two
weeks
left
till
they
go
for
final
deploy.
C
I
mean
I
I
just
didn't
realize
they
were
already
in
review.
That's
all
like
they
should,
I
would
say,
a
move
to
review
right
now.
If
they
haven't
yet
and
then
b,
are
they
okay
to
move
into
last
call
soon
it's
up
to
the
author,
I
would
say
I
don't
think
we
put
any
hard
requirements
on
length
of
time.
You
have
to
be
in
review.
A
Right
yeah
go
ahead.
B
C
A
That,
okay,
I
think
that's
the
end
of
edson's
questions.
Edson
did
you
have
anything
else.
D
No,
I
think
we
should
track
the
funding
part
of
it
and
just
more
progress
on
getting
more
editors.
I
I
guess
you
said
next
year,
so
we
only
have
like
a
month
and
a
half
left.
We.
A
A
Okay,
thanks
edson
for
the
questions.
Those
were
good.
Next
up
is
the
item.
Three,
the
network
upgrade
process
medium
post
puja.
Do
you
have
an
update
on
that.
B
We
already
have
shared
this
network
update
process
with
the
all
codem
meeting
and
this
would
be
live
today.
I
have
shared
the
link
of
the
medium.
It
will
be
live
and
shared
with
rest
of
the
people.
We
haven't
received
any
comment
or
any
suggestions
to
make.
I
mean
like
a
corrective
suggestion
to
edit
on
the
process,
part
that
we
earlier
decided
on
or
maybe
discussed
on.
So
yes
that
would
be
going
live
today.
A
Great
anybody.
B
A
B
A
Cool
onboarding
eip
editors
expectation
guidelines.
We
already
went
over
that
and
as
one
of
edson's
questions,
I
think
unless
there's
something
else
that
this
item
refers
to.
B
A
The
decision
2021
is
actually
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
action
items,
there's
decision
items
I
think
that's
the
same
thing.
No,
that's
just
decisions
we
made.
So
we
don't
have
any
action
items
from
the
last
meeting.
I
don't
believe.
A
B
I
had
this
one
thing
in
mind
like
now
that
the
network
upgrade
repository
is
separated
from
this
entire
process.
I
had
a
question
like:
should
we
I
mean?
Is
it?
Is
it
the
right
thing
to
do
to
start
considering
issues
and
pull
requests
that
comes
over
there?
I
mean
in
this
eipap
group
also
that
eipip
is
like
we
are
talking
about
in
eip.
Editing,
so
can
we
bring
up
issues
which
are
there
and
heavily
discussed
bring
into
the
agenda
from
let's
meeting
onwards?
Is
it
okay.
A
A
So
wait:
can
you
rephrase
that
last
part
real,
quick,
though,
like.
B
So
my
question
here
was
like
whatever
issues
that
keep
on
getting
discussion
on
other
forums
and
is
related
to
definitely
of
related
to
eip
or
process
or
the
network
upgrade.
Is
it
fair
to
be
a
part
of
agenda.
A
B
C
So
for
the
eap
repository
we
have
eip
editors,
which
are
the
people
who
do
the
like
editing
like
making
sure
things
flow
through
the
process.
Is
there
a
similar
group
for
the
network
upgrade
process,
or
is
it
just
james.
A
Pretty
much
james
puja
and
tim
baiko,
okay,
james's
lead,
but
tim
and
pooja
help.
B
Yeah
we
are
just
helping
with
keeping
it
up
to
date
and
there
was
this
like
a
pull
request
that
we
received.
So
I
was
wondering
if
that
is
something
that
we
can
consider
here
and
talk
about.
I
don't
know,
I'm
not
sure,
because
I
don't
see
james
here
in
the
meeting
so.
B
A
C
Couldn't
didn't
get
a
response?
Oh
yeah,
the
the
merge
bot
the
emerge
bot
seems
to
randomly
turn
itself
on
and
off.
I
do
not
know
where
it
lives
or
how
to
make
it
turn
on
or
how
to
kick.
It
it'd
be
great
if
those
instructions
were
somewhere
that
I
could
find
and
more
people
have
access
to
it
who
are
reachable
because
when
it
goes
down,
it
usually
just
stays
down
for
days
and
it
kind
of
breaks
the
process
and
requires
a
bunch
more
work
from
me.
For
example,.
C
Nick
wrote
it
nick
does
not
so
like
for
that
nick
wrote.
It
nick
may
also
be
technically
the
operator,
but
I
haven't
actually
seen
nick
for.
C
A
Idea,
do
you
have
you,
do
you
have
a
like
a
talking
relationship
with
nick
micah
like
do
you
know
how
to
reach
out
to
him
on
twitter
or
otherwise?
I
can.
I
can
talk
to
him.
C
I'm
currently
boycotting
twitter.
I
do
see
him
in
the
ens
discord
like
I
know.
I
just
said
that
I
haven't
seen
him
for
12
months,
but
I
have
seen
actually
seen
his
name
pop
up
and
he
announced
this
chord
like
three
times
in
the
last
two
months.
So
maybe
I
can
reach
him
there.
Oh,
I
didn't
know
he
had
discord
yeah.
He
I
mean
there's,
there's
a
person
called
nick
johnson
who's,
answering
enos
questions
sporadically
in
the
unis.
So
I
think
that's
him
real.
Is
it
the
real
nick
johnson
who
we
will
never
know.
A
A
Go
okay,
anyways
cool
anything
else
from
anybody.
A
A
I
feel
like
I
don't
have
the
skill
set
required.
Maybe
I
do
like
what
would
I
don't
because
I
don't
know
the
code
or
anything.
C
A
C
A
E
I
was
gonna
say
maybe
longer
term
we
can
look
at
like
malloc
to
see.
If
maybe
I
don't
know
if
it's
an
editor,
that's
also
like
you
know,
really
inclined
to
work
on
the
merge
bot.
I
you
know
I
would
like
to
work
with
the
merge
bot,
but
between
full-time
work,
helping
with
the
repository
doing
the
ci
bot.
E
C
C
A
Okay,
you
went
mute
for
a
second
micah
was
at
the
end
of
your
talking.
It
kind
of
sounded
like
it
cut
out.
I
believe
so.
A
Cool
okay
awesome
anything
else
from
anybody.