►
From YouTube: EIPIP Meeting 76
Description
Agenda: https://github.com/ethereum-cat-herders/EIPIP/issues/217
A
A
So
last
week
we
received
a
comment
from
a
username
ABC
like
these
are
the
first
three
alphabets
I
cannot
write
the
full
name,
but
you
can
follow
the
comment
on
the
agenda
here,
so
he
is
proposing
to
be
an
EAP
editor.
Maybe
an
interim
AIP
editor
who
may
be
able
to
help
out
with
the
EIP
number
allocation.
I.
Remember
we
discussed
in
the
past
for
having
a
bot
for
a
location
of
EIP
number,
but
we
are
not
there
yet.
A
B
I,
don't
think
adding
somebody
just
to
assign
EIP
numbers
is,
is
good.
Panda
pip
has
started
working
on
a
bot
to
or
like
updating
the
merge
bot
for
that.
So
we'll
see
where
that
goes.
A
Not
really,
it
looks
like
he
has
intervened
a
few
times.
He
also
has
added
a
link
to
comments
where
he
left
his
thoughts,
while
discussing
the
number
for
the
EIP.
C
A
Okay,
so
no
I,
I'm
I
mean,
if
I
understand
this
correct,
I
I,
don't
think
the
proposal
is
to
be
reviewing
all
the
proposals
as
of
now,
but
only
for
the
allocation
part.
So
let
me
go
back
with
with
the
discussion
here
today,
so
if
he
tries
to
extend
his
proposal
to
maybe
look
into
more
on
to
erc's
and
then
probably
it
could
be
considered
again
now,
we
will
have
to
look
into
all
the
criteria
that
has
been
listed
earlier
to
become
an
ERC
editor.
C
A
Thank
you.
How
many
we're
gonna
add
it
at
the
like
end
of
the
meeting
like
every
past
meetings.
I
have
started,
writing
summary
down
there.
So
we'll
see
what
is
the
response
Panda
mentioned
that
he
would
be
joining
a
bit
late,
so
if
he
has
anything
further
to
add
about
his
peer
yeah,
we
can
talk.
Then.
A
Moving
on
to
the
next
item
is
full
spell
check
so
I
remember:
it
was
discussed
in
ethereum,
Caterers
Discord
about
the
spelling
error.
Yeah
matter,
you
mentioned
okay,
not
a
problem.
Matt
mentioned
that.
Can
we
have
a
full
spell
check,
I,
don't
know
if
anyone
would
like
to
maybe
talk
about
it
and
if
anyone
has
any
proposal.
C
I
don't
know
I
get
a
tired.
I
will
spell
check,
set
up
for
the
execution
apis
Repository.
It
just
doesn't
work
perfectly.
There's
plenty
of
times
where
you
have
compound
words,
that
are
words,
and
it
says
that
they're
not
and
then
you
have
to
manually
add
them.
So
it's
not
really
ideal,
but
whatever
we
have
right
now
is
missing
a
lot
of
words,
and
so
I
would
like
to
find
something.
That's
at
least
better.
A
All
right,
Jose
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
have
any
proposal
for
this
like
would
you
be
interested
in
poking
into
it
or
looking
into
it.
E
Hello,
Happy
Day,
first
of
all,
yes
well,
I
was
just
wondering
if
we
can
just
work
to
make
Richard
the
dictionary
for
code
spell
which
is
barely
now
42
000
Words,
which
is
very
small,
I,
don't
know
we
can
just
take
every
every
IP
proposal
go
around
collect
the
collect
this
parents
that
are
not
into
the
the
mispelling
words
that
are
not
included
in
the
code.
Spell.
E
E
We
we
create
one
of
what
we
create
an
action
to
to
check
that
was
considered
I
mean
months
ago
months
ago,
but
we,
the
UA
editors,
decide
to
go
with
the
code
spell
which
is
fine,
but
indeed
this
is
a
very
poor
vocabulary.
Word
code
spell
has
right
now,
so
either
we
increment
during
the
time
the
vocabulary
or
we,
we
just
add
the
a
new
action
to
the
AP
board
with
the
bigger
vocabulary.
A
I'm
not
100
sure,
like
going
by
each
and
every
proposal
and,
having
like
every
word
added
in
code,
spell
like
how
long
would
that
take?
Do
we
have
an
automated
solution
for
that.
F
From
what
I've
seen
on
the
good
spell
repository,
they
generally
merge
PRS
that
just
add
new
misspellings
quite
quickly.
So
if
we
want
to
just
if
we
have
a
PR
that
has
a
bunch
of
their
spellings,
just
give
it
to
me
and
I'll
submit
a
PR
that
adds
all
the
misspellings
to
the
code
spell
repository
and
then
I'll
submit
in
the
appear
to
the
eip's
repository
updating
it
to
the
latest
version
of
goods.
Bell.
A
So
are
we
are
we
planning
to
have,
like
you
know,
a
list
of
purple
something
okay.
So
there
is
this
proposal
to
switch
to
something
with
a
white
list
and
use
a
specific
extension
for
our
words:
okay,
yeah.
If
you
would
like
to
elaborate
that
some,
maybe
because
you
know
a
chat,
messages
are
generally
not
available
to
people
who
are
listening
to
the
call
okay,
not
a
problem,
so
it
looks
like
it's
I
mean
it's
noisy,
so
he's
trying
to
avoid
what
Sam
mentioned.
A
It's
like
it
might
be
easier
to
switch
to
something
with
the
white
list
and
use
a
specific
extension
for
our
words,
and
he
may
have
a
couple
of
options
as
eapw.
So
probably
we
can
look
into
that,
and
the
other
proposal
by
Panda
paper
I,
think,
is
to
provide
him
the
list
and
he
would
be
merging
it
quickly.
A
A
A
F
D
F
F
A
Okay,
so
now
that
is
merged,
I
hope
there
is
no
reason
to
revert
it
unless
you
strongly
feel
about
it
or
anyone
strongly
feels
about
it.
F
I
do
not
strongly
feel
about
it,
I
feel
about
it,
although
I
would
like
to
be
added
use,
although
I
would
like
to
be
at
a
uniquely
linked
sections,
which
would
not
be
possible
if
you
have
duplicate
sections.
A
Fair
enough,
okay,
very
well:
this
is
now
merged,
so
I
can
get
stun
day
and
we
can
move
on
to
the
next
one,
which
is
a
discon
discussion
continued
from
the
earlier
meetings.
A
So
in
the
past
meeting
we
found
a
few
proposals
coming
up
from
William
and
trikon,
an
author
who
is
suggesting
to
kind
of
provide
some
features
or
maybe
improve
the
UI
of
present
website.
I
see
there
are
a
couple
of
pull
requests,
but
at
the
same
time
we
also
had
a
look
on
the
new
proposed
upgrade
for
the
EIP
website.
A
F
Are
we
discussing
the
adding
of
the
Arts
and
speeds
the
ending
of
the
filter
page
or
my
revise.
F
So,
what's
you
know
worth
learning
about
my
rewrite
is
that
it
actually
does
include
both
the
edition
of
the
filter
page,
although
it's
adding
a
new
page,
not
actually
overriding
the
index
page
here,
and
it
also
does
add
the
RSS
it
RSS
feeds
and
it
also
adds
atom
feeds
alongside
them.
A
Okay-
and
my
next
question
would
be
like:
do
we
have
any
issues
with
the
present
PR
like
why
we
could
not
merge?
That?
Is
there
anything.
F
However,
I
feel
like
it's
still
pretty
well
known
and
compare
and
right
now
we
have
two
people
that
can
actually
read
and
maintain
the
new
wheatgrass
website
and
right
now
we
have
and
right
now
we
also
have
to
end
right
now.
We
have
well
one
person
that
can
kind
of
read
The
Jackal
website,
maybe
to
people
that
can
kind
of
read
the
Jekyll
website
and
make
small
changes
to
it.
So
in
terms
of
actually
being
able
to
maintain
it.
This
is
an
improvement,
despite
the
fact
that
it's
comparatively
less
well-known.
A
D
A
Awesome:
okay,
in
that
case
like
if
any
editor
has
thoughts
on
PR
number
six
five
one
eight,
which
Gavin
just
shared
I,
have
added
that
in
agenda
as
well
like
where
we
are,
and
if
people
have
thought
suggestion
on
having
that
merged.
F
Like
friend,
mind
specifying
any
new
objections
you
might
have,
you
were
the
one
that
got
subjected.
C
Yeah
I
mean
I
think
the
objection
is
still
the
same.
I
would
rather
focus
on
something
that's
extremely
widely
used.
I
would
rather
avoid
using
JavaScript
and
focusing
on
just
having
markdown
files.
I,
don't
think
that,
having
more
people
being
able
to
support
this
is
necessarily
a
huge
win,
because
I
don't
think
that
these
things
should
be
changing
too
much.
F
A
A
curious
question
here,
so
the
pr
that
we
have
received
earlier
for
like
more
RSS
feed
and
rewrite
index
filters,
were
they
affecting
the
current
website,
the
current
page
that
we
have
in
any
way
like
they
were
just
Improvement
suggestions
weren't.
They.
F
Yes,
but
if
we
choose
to
do
the
website
website
rewrite,
then
those
do
not
need
to
be
merged,
because
the
website
we
write
contains
both
of
them.
A
I
mean
like
we
can
merge
and
in
the
meantime
we
can
discuss
about
this
migration
that
we
are
talking
about
it.
It
doesn't
look
like
we
have
like
a
full
agreement
and
everything
is
in
place.
So
for
that
time
being
that
could
be
done.
What
do
other
people
think
I
mean
it's
just
my
thought.
What
do
other
people
think.
B
I
haven't
actually
looked
in
depth
into
this
PR,
but
it
looks
like
it's
switching
it
from
like
a
plain
static,
HTML
page
to
like
a
JavaScript
search.
Is
that
correct.
F
I,
don't
like
how
it
deletes
all
the
existing
Authority
I
see
those
ones
but
I
mean
having
the
filter
is
really
nice.
A
Okay
and
I
see
that
it
is
like
with
all
other
filters,
except
that
all
page,
so
if
we
keep
the
oil
base
disk
good
work,
non-erc.xml.
A
Okay,
do
we
think
leaving
a
comment
on
this
PR
for
author
would
make
sense
why
I'm.
A
Thank
you
well
I'm
discussing
this
is
because
I'm
hoping
that,
if
we
are
allowing
PRS
to
be
coming
up
from
Community,
we
are
encouraging
people
to
come
up
with
suggestion
and
it
would
not
be
solely
on
the
editors
to
like
bring
up
changes
and
things
like
that.
So,
while
we
are
waiting
for
bringing
a
major
overhaul,
maybe
we
can
allow
a
minor
pull
requests
which
are
coming
from
Community
to
add
some
improvement
to
the
present
website.
A
Okay,
so
this
is
done
and
do
we
have
any
thoughts
and
comments
on
RSS
feed
I
think
there
is
an
open
Action
for
the
proposal
here.
A
So
I
I,
hear
Sam
here
that
giving
permission
to
third
party
link
for
email
could
be
a
concern,
but
I
don't
know
like
it
seems
like
that
is
something
recommended
or
being
used
Wiley.
Where
are
we
on
that?
I
understand
a
third
party
permission.
A
Third
party
link
permission
totally,
but
do
we
have
strong
feeling
and
we
should
not
allow,
or
should
we
start
this
because
I
have
found
okay,
one
argument
I
want
to
give
in
favor
of
allowing
this
is
we
have
found
that
the
protocol
information
that
is
now
being
disseminated
with
the
email
and
it's
been
very
helpful
for
people
to
receiving
notification
for
blog.ethereum.org?
So
if
we
can
have
RSS
feed
like
this,
and
we
can
start
sending
email
notification
that
could
help
more
users
to
be
aware
of.
What's
going
on
in
the
background,
oh.
A
Do
we
have
any
other
alternative
I
don't
know?
Maybe
we
can
check
with
protocol
team
I
can
check
with
team
and
all
like
what
kind
of
services
they
are
using.
If
not
this
one.
B
A
That
make
a
lot
of
sense.
Okay,
so
I
will
try
to
check
with
the
protocol
team
what
kind
of
email
Services
they
are
using
right
now
and
well,
maybe
check
with
the
author
itself.
If
they
have
any
I
mean
in
this
proposal,
if
he
has
any
thought
on
implementing
the
one
that
is
being
already
used
for
sending
out
ethereum
blog
posts.
G
A
Fair
enough
to
conclude,
we
could
not
make
any
decision
on
6483
it
will
be
discussed.
Similarly,
we
do
not
have
any
consensus
on
6579
just
some
next
steps
that
we
should
be
looking
into
it
more
in
detail,
and
it
looks
like
we
do
not
have
6518
consensus
as
well.
Unless
people
are
like,
you
know,
having
more
thoughts
on
merging
it
today,.
A
A
A
Okay
moving
ahead,
so
we
already
discussed
moving
away
from
Jekyll,
that's
basically
discussing
6518
and
the
next
one
here
is
five:
four:
five:
seven,
which
is
update,
712
fix
each
sign
type,
data
or
definition.
So
in
the
last
meeting
we
discussed
this,
but
we
did
not
reach
any
consensus
there.
What
to
do
like?
Should
we
keep
it
open?
Should
we
like
just
close
it,
because
we
don't
want
to
change
any
anything
to
this
proposal.
Yeah.
D
A
D
A
A
Okay,
I
think
this
in
concluded
all
of
the
discussion
from
the.
F
E
A
E
A
Okay
and
this
pull
request
66.
Is
it
the
one
coming
for
for
this
issue?
Number
five?
Yes,
yeah
I
can
see
that.
Thank
you,
Jose
yeah!
Please
keep
us
posted
on
whatever
progress
you
are
making
on
like
issues.
I
see,
there
are
quite
a
number
of
open
issues,
so
I
hope
that
we
can
start
taking
on
it
one
by
one
and
Sam.
If
there
are
any
priority
like,
if
you
can
Define,
then
it
would
be
best
that
Jose
can
work
with
you
and
look
into
the
issues
which
are
on
higher
priority
side.
A
A
A
I
know
the
website
is
not
the
puff,
not
in
perfect
status
till
date
we
did
it
last
month,
but
for
some
reason
now
it's
giving
some
error
for
last
call
and
final
eibs
will
try
to
fix
it,
but
yeah.
That's
all
the
status
as
per
date,
like
March
8th,
we
have
four
new
proposal
added
in
the
EAP
repository
and
two
have
been
moved
to
the
final
status.
A
Okay,
the
next
one
is
the
EAP
editing
officer.
Unfortunately,
we
could
not
have
our
meeting
last
Tuesday,
that
is
yesterday,
but
we
have
added
a
pull
request
for
authors
who
reached
out
to
us
for
us
for
some
kind
of
help
or
attention
from
editor
and
those
have
been
listed
in
the
agenda
for
meeting
number
13..
A
I
hope
EAP
editors
may
take
a
look
whenever
they
get
chance
and
whatever
will
be
open
by
our
next
meeting.
We'll
try
to
have
that
added,
so
EIP
authors,
if
you
have
any
question,
comment,
concern
related
to
your
pull
requests
that
you
have
made
and
you're
trying
to
understand.
Something
may
be
able
to
talk
to
EIP
editors
directly
regarding
your
PR,
please
feel
free
to
join
the
EIP
editing
office
hour.
That
happens
every
other
Tuesday,
so
it
will
be
around
two
weeks
from
now
at
1500
UTC
people
living
in
United
States.
A
Please
make
a
note
of
this.
There
would
be
a
DSD
saving
ending,
so
the
time
would
be
changing.
It
would
not
be
as
per
your
like
a
clock,
not
10.
It
would
be
nine.
No
sorry
11
A.M
yeah,
it
would
be.
11
am
EST
Zone,
so
yeah.
The
time
would
be
changed
for
this
meeting
as
well
for
eipip
meeting,
which
is
1400
UTC
right
now,
which
is
9
00
am
on
EST
and
it
would
be
10
am
from
the
next
meeting
onward.
F
Add
share
yeah.
Did
we
remember
to
discuss
adding
what's
his
name.
A
A
Okay,
yeah
yeah.
We
did
discuss
briefly
so
what
editors
think
here
is
like.
If
we
would
like
to
have
on
board,
we
would
like
to
have
a
data
on
board
for
reviewing.
Ercs
are
not
only
just
for
the
allocation
of
numbers,
so
we
need
to
check
with
the
ABC
if
he
is
open
for
reviewing
as
a
reviewer.
He.
A
F
A
Yeah,
so
if
we
were
trying
to
understand
the
services
offered,
if
it
is
for
overall
review
of
a
proposal
and
not
limited
to
assigning
number,
then
that
seems
like
a
good
idea.
So
we
might
want
to
encourage
him
to
maybe
to
have
reviewed
the
proposal
as
well.
D
H
A
So
I
think
the
pull
request
that
has
been
created,
which
is
6575,
may
not
be
merged
just
yet.
We
will
leave
comment
for
user
ABC
and,
if
is
open
to
that,
then
probably
will
have
to
go
through
the
checklist
that
we
have
for
ERC
editors
and
we'll
have
him
on
board.
If
that
makes
sense,.
G
All
right
sorry
I
was
I
was
late.
Have
we
discussed
anything
updates
on
the
plan
for
introducing
more
peer,
reviewers,
not.
D
G
I
know
that
stands
is
leading
this
effort
and
yeah
look
forward
to
see
what
could
we
do
to
help
out.
A
Okay,
so
I
remember
mentioning
this
particular
topic
a
few
weeks
ago,
and
we
were
discussing
that
the
present
list
of
peer
Reviewer
is
not
very
effective.
We
may
have
to
come
up
with
a
new
list
of
reviewers
and
if
anybody
in
the
community
is
interested
in
helping
us
with
reviewing
eits
which
are
coming
into
repository,
may
please
reach
out
to
Sam.
He
will
add
it
add
the
abuser
to
the
list
and
we
can
continue
having
more
reviewers
added
to
this
list.
A
G
Yeah
I
think
generally,
there
are
a
lot
of
interest
that
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
do
it
right.
We
receive
good
passion
from
VIP
authors
that
are
interested
in
both
continue
to
support
this
program
with
their
authoring
and
potentially
reviewing
and
also
I
gave
a
presentation
of
EIC
rep
to
invite
sharing
reference
implementation
in
a
more
structural
way,
also
get
a
lot
of
bonds
and
I
know
that
Sam
was
not
there.
G
I
love
to
kind
of
learn
with
Sam
and
see.
How
can
we
kind
of
work
out
a
a
pivot
to
bring
on
more
success
on
that,
but
I
love
to
hear
other
editors,
opinion
or
kind
of
guidance
on
how
that
could
be
improved.
G
So
can
I
kind
of
find
some
time
to
chat
with
you.
I
guess
that
not
every
editors
are
particularly
interested
in
this
pocket,
but
I
surely
feel
very,
very
passionate
about
the
direction
that
you
have
shared
so
can
I
kind
of
find
time
to
chat
with
you
and
then
maybe
we
can,
of
course,
have
some
different
sorry
about
our
outcome.
H
Yeah
I'm
not
sure
of
the
way
to
go,
but
for
quite
a
while
I
thought.
We
need
more
peer
review,
especially
on
the
ERC
side,
to
take
the
load
off
because
there's
just
too
many
of
them
that
cover
way
too
wide
a
range
of
interest
for
anyone
at
it
or
to
necessarily
know
about
or
care
about.
H
But
if
there's
some
way,
I
think
for
an
ERC
to
come
in
and
just
as
a
matter
of
course,
there
needs
to
be
a
a
peer
review
or
volunteering
to
to
help
deal
with
that
ERC
on
through
the
process.
B
Well,
something
like
Panda,
Pips
tags,
I
think
would
be
pretty
useful
for
that,
because
then
peer
reviewers
could
like
subscribe
to
the
tags,
they're
interested
in
and
then
get
a
notification,
but
that
would
require
you
know
either
defining
a
list
of
categories
or
letting
people
be
free
form
and
that's
kind
of
a
problem.
I'm.
F
Thinking,
basically
being
able
to
any
five
me
five
final
eips,
whose
authors
all
all
agree
that
some
that
their
final
AIP
should
be
a
tagged,
can
create
a
new
tag.
That's
my
idea.
A
F
A
B
D
G
B
Okay,
yeah
I
think,
but
but
like
the
the
problem
is
not
everybody
who
reviews
ERC
like
a
lot
of
ERC
reviewers
like
what
I
collected
volunteers,
would
only
review
like
a
a
sudden,
narrow
slice
right
like
some
of
them
are
only
interested
in
like
nfts,
specifically
or
some
of
them
are
interested
in.
Like
you
know,
the
peer-to-peer
layer
of
the
networking
stack
and
it's
like
all
right,
but
we
don't
have
any
great
like
where
to
have
granularity
on
that.
H
B
H
The
Rings
are
supposed
to
help
the
mere
magicians
being
out
there,
but
yeah
not
I,
don't
care
so
much
about
a
tag
system,
just
a
policy
that
says
people
need
help
on
this.
H
It's
part
of
the
process,
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
how
to
make
it
a
stronger
part
of
the
process,
but
it
yeah
it
needs
to
me.
This
is
a
pretty
standard
thing
for
for
professional
journals
to
engage
peer,
reviewers
and
the
same.
The
same
people
don't
have
to
review.
You
know
article
after
article
after
article
they
get
chosen
to
review
particular
articles
that
they
have
expertise
in
yeah.
B
B
Week
around
a
few
times
but
yeah
they
don't
reply,
that's
that's.
The
problem.
I've
been
having
yeah.
G
S
yeah
I
was
feeling
the
same
with
with
Greg
I,
certainly
hop
on
a
new
drop
proposal,
and
have
you
read
the
other
EIC
ERC
for
eips
and
then
and
like
why
they're
different
like
do
you
intended
to
collaborate
or
compete
with
both
are
okay
and
then,
if
so,
identify
who
you
think
might
be
the
best
peer
reviewers
to
nominate
them
and
see
if
you
can
get
them
to
kind
of
give
you
comments
so
I?
G
A
So,
generally
speaking,
I
think
the
idea
of
getting
it
reviewed
is
is
obviously
needed.
People
are
looking
for
that,
but
people
who
can
be
reached
out
should
be
from
the
group
of
authors
who
have
already
submitted
it.
So
the
list
I
think
is
going
to
be
helpful,
but
instead
of
us
pinging
it
would
be
making
more
sense
if
they
are
getting
notified
by
some
process,
maybe
by
the
tag
or
something,
and
they
can
subscribe
to
certain
things,
and
that
would
be
way
more
effective.
A
I
don't
know
Victor.
If
you
would
like
to
maybe
because
I
know
you
have
contacted
a
lot
of
EIP
authors,
maybe
discuss
this
further
and
maybe
next
meeting
we
can
come
up
with
something
that
can
be
shared
with
vital
Community
like
how
do
we
want
to
take
it
further.
G
F
If
I
could
come
in
and
say
that
I
think
that
probably
it
would,
the
list
would
be
a
bit
better
if
the
GitHub
user
names
were
pinged
every
time
that
all
of
the
reviews
is
reviews
is
GitHub.
Usernames
were
pinged.
Every
time
there
was
a
relevant
PR
I
bet
that
would
get
more
more
feedback.
B
Well,
we
want
the
technical
discussion
on
the
discussions,
2
thread
and
oh
yeah
editing
discussion
on
the
pr,
and
since
these
are
all
technical
reviews,
it
makes
sense
to
oh
like
what
what
I
would
love
is.
Every
time
a
PR
is
put
up
for
a
an
EIP
to
have
a
message
posted
in
the
discussion
thread
being
like,
there's
been
a
PR
for
this
I
think
that'd
be
great,
but.
H
F
What,
if
what
if
hear
me
help
I
stick
the
discussions
to
link
in
the
actual
EIP
review
bot
comment.
B
So
you'd
say
something
like
requesting.
F
B
F
A
I
think
it
would
make
sense
Panda
if
you
can
maybe
create
an
issue
on
that
issue
in
the
repository,
so
people
can
also
add
their
thoughts.
This
is
a
good
idea.
We
would
like
to
have
notifications
sent
out
for
people
who
are
really
interested
into
it,
not
to
all.
So
while
you
are
working
on
it
and
maybe
kind
of
developing
the
idea
more
concrete.
If
you
create
issue
that
would
be
also
a
kind
of
community
notification.