►
From YouTube: Ethereum Core Devs Meeting #51 [2018-12-06]
Description
A
A
B
A
C
Hi
everybody
so
I'm
Brian
nice
to
meet
you
not
quite
a
chord
F
I
thought
it'd
be
nice
to
have
eating
anyway.
I
was
recently
hired
to
work
full-time
on
making
testing
better.
That's
a
pretty
like
I'm,
also,
not
sure.
If
that
means
yet
I
guess
ideas
make
it
easy
to
generate
tests
easy
to
like
use
the
tests.
I.
C
Think
a
big
piece
of
that
yeah
I've
talked
to
Trinity
a
bit.
I
have
an
idea
of
like
what
they
want,
but
I
love.
Ben
can
reach
out
to
me
and
tell
me
about
the
things
that
like
they
would
like
to
see
better
see
improving
the
past,
so
I'm
be
easier
for,
like
you
can't
be
written
to
integrate
with
them.
A
D
D
Every
test
that
we
have
for
exposure
could
be
enhanced,
like
that.
I
received
a
lot
of
help
actually
on
writing
as
confirmation
again
and
Hyuga,
and
it's
mostly
follows.
Expert
Josh
was
at
core
ideas
that
we
had
are
covered
now.
I
finish,
incurring
the
same
ideas
that
we
still
have
asked
in
our
list,
while
still
waiting
for
any
contribution,
4-bit
shift
figure.
D
D
A
E
F
There
is
no
major
updates
or
a
mess,
and
we've
been
mostly
working
on
beacon
chain
implementation.
There's
been
a
lot
of
recent
changed
in
this
back
and
it's
not
yet
settled
down.
So
a
lot
of
things
to
do
catching
up
with
those
changes
at
the
moment,
and
we'll
probably
do
that
next
couple
of
weeks,
that's
it
mamas.
Okay,.
A
G
G
H
I
Hello,
so
a
couple
of
sides,
first
of
all,
in
terms
of
development
I,
have
those
rewind
bugs
that
I
found
with
Robson
sync,
so
it
kind
of
sinks
to
Robson.
Now
so
then,
I
started
to
work
on
the
test.
Suites,
so
I,
just
Martin
mentioned
that
he
would
encourage
people
to
run
it
once
in
a
while,
so
I've
never
actually
tested
them.
I
So
I
currently
have
some
issues
but
I'm
fixing
them
and
I
in
order
to
make
it
work,
I
had
to
modify
both
GB,
which
might
be
interesting
for
some
people
that
now
I
can
run
both
DB
in
the
in
memory
mode,
which
means
that
it
doesn't
have
anything
on
disk.
Something
I
wanted
to
do
for
a
long
time,
but
just
never
got
to
it.
I
So
now
I
have
that
option,
so
the
client
is
still
not
ready
for
Constantinople,
because
there's
still
a
create
to
revival
was
still
not
addressed,
but
I
will
address
it
at
some
point
and
so
in
terms
of
the
actual
usage
I
found
myself
using
the
trooper
gets
quite
a
lot
recently
because
I
don't
know
it
for
other
clients,
but
it
turned
out
that
it's
actually
quite
useful
for
extracting
the
data
I.
Would
it
I
used
for
state
grant
proposal,
and
so
I
am
still
using
it
quite
a
lot.
I
J
K
Yeah
so
lately
we've
been
focusing
on
on
the
parts
of
the
VM
which
relate
to
developer
experience,
debugging
and
tracing
and
such
so,
if
you'd
like,
if
you
have
any
good
ideas
in
that
I,
have
feel
free
to
mention
them
to
us
something
we
were
working
actively
on
right
now,
that's
a
good
time
and
also
call
attention
since
or
testing
edition
of
that
all
coordinates
call.
There
is
the
first
it
to
point
out
testings
of
framework
and
proof
of
concept.
K
L
L
A
N
Save
a
little
back
in
the
context.
Swarm
is
a
part
of
Gath
it's
in
the
same
repository
with
its
own
semantic
versioning.
So
the
last
guest
release
contains
warm
improvements
such
as
access
control
and
feeds,
which
will
be
announced
in
the
4
version,
with
the
blog
post,
which
is
coming
with
the
next
major
release
of
Gath
and
an
update
for
the
last
two
weeks.
We
introduced
user
perception,
tests
and
benchmarks.
A
O
Yeah
this
is
Lane
I,
don't
know
that
we
really
have
an
update.
We
we
have
milestones
that
we're
working
towards
so
the
most
recent
one
I
think
I
think
we
hit
milestone
two
we're
working
towards
a
milestone.
Three,
you
know
more
work
going
in
like
we
released
a
proposal
for
eighth
one
X
I,
guess
that
was
kind
of
the
main
thrusts
recently
and
just
kind
of
trying
to
pull
design
together
to
get
ready
for
that
table
will
do
anything
else
to
add.
M
P
You
know
polishing
up
data
structures
that
kind
of
stuff,
rather
than
doing
overhauls
of
like
the
core
algorithm
is
going
on.
So,
as
people
have
mentioned,
it's
been
tough
to
keep
up
with
these
changes,
but
again
we're
really
honing
in
on
what
we
would
call
like
a
first
version
of
a
really
release
candidate.
P
Beyond
that
the
phase
one
stuff
is
discharge.
Data
chain,
algorithms
and
general
data
structures
are
kind
of
forming.
There,
I
mean
the
general
algorithms
are
known,
whereas
they
are
being
specified
in
a
systematic
way,
the
beginnings
of
that
and
then
in
terms
of
the
state
execution,
account
structures,
etc.
A
Great
thanks
for
the
update
as
far
as
vdf
schoo
I
know,
Justin
had
a
really
good
mainstage
talk
at
Def
Con
about
vdf
that
should
still
be
on
slides,
live
and
the
other
DEFCON
4.
Video
should
be
released
today
or
Monday.
I
just
got
done,
uploading
all
of
them
and
manually
putting
in
every
title
so
they're
all
in
there
and
I
just
need
to
write
up
the
blog
post
and
get
that
going
and
get
approval
for
a
few
things.
So
that
should
be
hopefully
up
today.
A
A
Q
I
State
could
code
state
rent
it's
one
of
the
things,
so
the
first
version
has
been
published
for
the
person
of
the
proposal
has
been
published
and
since
then
it
received
a
lot
of
feedback.
I'm
really
grateful
for
that,
and
so
the
most
interesting
one
was
that
Vitalik
was
actually
suggesting
to
use
create
to
up
code
with
some
other
programming
things
to
implement,
something
which
I
was
proposing
to
implement
with
linear
cross
cross.
Contract
storage
and
I
started.
I
I
So
but
I
will
still,
although
so,
basically
based
on
that
the
linear
cost
control
storage
were
most
likely
going
to
be
dropped
from
the
proposal
in
a
next
version
and
also
priority
queue
and
a
step
two
will
probably
be
removed.
But
I
haven't
kind
of
done.
This
second
proposal
yet
so
then,
but
I
will
still
be
looking
into
linear
storage
elsewhere.
For
example,
it
might
be
quite
useful
for
you
as
an
integration
so,
but
at
the
moment
ago,
that
might
basically
must
probably
go
out
of
the
scope.
I
So
it's
based
on
Pantheon
at
the
moment
so
and
then
also
I've
done
a
lot
of
data
analysis,
some
of
which
was
not
presented
in
the
said
grant
proposal.
So
the
latest
one
was
I
was
trying
to
write
a
hit
and
run
heuristics
to
identify
all
where
C
20
tokens
that
exist
in
the
state
and
so
I
was
the
usually
successful
token
transfer
so,
and
it
turns
out
that
it
was
about
seventy
one
thousand
a-year
C
20
tokens
in
existence,
and
they
take
about
thirty.
Fifty
three
percent
of
the
contract,
storage
and
actually
interesting
proof.
I
Chickadees,
is
also
air.
C
22
a
contract
I
didn't
realize
that
because
it's
got
both
a
or
C
20
and
our
C
seven
to
one
and
considering
that
it's
very
important
class
of
the
contract.
So
that's
why
I've
done
the
sample
implementation
of
it
using
the
italics
ideas,
and
the
next
step
would
be
to
look
into
the
on
chain
order.
Books
is
I
also
from
the
italics
post
and
research.
So
I
put
some
ideas
about
how
to
identify
them.
I
So
essentially
I
guess
talking
in
this
case
will
not
take
a
lot
of
space
in
the
snapshots
when
you
try
to
sync
it
up
and
for
this
particular
that
I'm
not
sure
how
well
suited
the
other.
Clients
are
for
this
data
analysis.
But
if
somebody
wants
to
look
at
the
Google,
aetherium
dataset,
like
I,
haven't
looked
at
it
myself,
because
I
didn't
have
that
time.
I
If
somebody
can
try
to
do
that
and
then
if
they
get
the
kind
of
the
hang
of
it,
so
maybe
there
could
it
be
a
good
way
to
sort
of
split
up
this
work,
because
obviously
there's
so
much
so
many
things
to
do
in
this
stream
and
I
won't
be
able
to
do
this
all
along
so
and
that's
why
I
I'm
trying
to
enlist
some
people
to
do
proof
of
concept
together
and
analysis
data
analysis
and
maybe
modifications
and
solidity
invite
or
to
make
all
these
things
easier.
So
that's
it
for
me
great.
O
Not
to
my
knowledge,
I
think
the
proposal
represents
the
sort
of
snapshot
of
our
work
and
understanding
and
there's
also
in
fellowship
with
their
magician's
forum
thread
open,
which
I,
don't
think
has
been
super
active
up
to
now,
but
we
could
take
the
conversation
there.
People
have
questions
okay,.
B
H
H
A
few
things
that
I'm
currently
trying
to
do
is
that
in
the
blog
post,
I
mentioned
that,
in
my
opinion,
the
two
viable
approaches
that
we
need
to
somehow
experiment
we
don't
play
with
is
either
ipfs
or
big
trend,
but
honestly,
both
of
them
kind
of
suck
a
bit
and
since
then
I
was
actually
considering
experimenting
a
bit
with
Felix's
eonar
work.
So
essentially,
if
anyone
hears
isn't
familiar
with
it,
Felix
is
working
on
on
a
tiny
extension
to
discovery
protocol
which
is
really
elegant.
H
H
Well,
no,
so
what
discovery
v5
it
depends
on
how
you
define
it.
So
the
way
current
light
servers
work
that
discovery
v5
was
complicit
Bend
because
it
was
just
a
horrible
hack
so
that
that
is
not
it's
a
different
thing,
but
I
guess:
Felix
wants
this
eonar
to
become
the
new
discovery,
be
five.
So
in
from
that
perspective
you,
yes,
you
could
call
it
a
v5.
H
So
the
top
memory
was
that
it
was
just
kind
of
hacked
into
the
protocol,
but
it
wasn't
really
scalable
or
working
properly.
And
then
this
was
a
really
clear.
Dnr
approach
is
kind
of
clear
felix
has
a
few
e
IP
is
open,
so
it
so.
There
are
quite
a
lot
of
material
already
on
it
published
on
the
on
the
yaki
repo,
yes
answered,
we're.
P
H
K
H
H
R
A
Thanks
Peter,
hey
Shawn,
we
just
went
through
the
working
group
updates.
Is
there
anything
on
your
side
that
you
wanted
to
discuss?
We
just
kind
of
went
through
everyone.
Every
working
group
and
Zach
talked
about
the
meeting.
He's
gonna
have
on
simulation
in
a
couple
hours
or
an
hour
and
a
half
nothing
for
me
to
add
Thanks
great
okay,
that's
all
the
working
groups,
Constantinople
hard
Fork
is
next
on
the
agenda.
A
I,
don't
think,
there's
much
to
talk
about,
except
for
two
things
stir
be
and
what
off
reposted
in
the
agenda
about
the
possible
block
numbers
and
calculated
based
on
time
now
that
we
have
block
time
now,
we
know
more
about
block
x.
So
let's
talk
about
that
first,
with
offeree.
I,
think
the
gist
of
it
is
we're
still
fine
and
there's
a
plus
minus
two
day,
variant,
right
or
variance.
S
Yeah
exactly
so
last
time
we
decided
to
talk
about
a
block
number.
This
meeting
and
yeah
I
just
put
down
some
numbers,
and
if
we
go
for
like
middle
of
the
week
or
Wednesday
I
did
some
calculations
how
much
it
could
marry
under
different
scenarios
and
if
we
decide
on
a
block
number
today,
it
most
likely
be
one.
A
week
day.
T
A
H
H
L
O
A
I
H
S
That's
all
because
of
the
high
difficulty
of
the
magnet,
but
what
could
happen
is
said?
It's
like
a
first
case
scenarios
if
the
price
of
Issa
continuous
dropping
very
fast
that
a
lot
of
turn
turn
off
the
mining
works
that
could
slow
us
down,
but
yeah
we
have
top
of
it.
I,
don't
know
I
mean
we
have
to
agree
at
some
point
for
block
number
and
I.
I
E
Just
to
make
this
clear
because
we're
thinking
of
putting
in
the
block
number
into
the
next
release,
possibly
with
a
switch
to
say
so,
you
can
delay
it
from
on
the
command
line,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
so
we're
we're
not
planning
on
changing
the
block
number
just
because
it
will
fluctuate
on
a
weekend
right.
The
only
reason
to
change
the
block
number
would
be
to
find
another
consensus
right.
A
I
H
H
Wait:
I
guess:
as
long
as
we
have
we
rolled
our
block,
numbers
are
only
in
the
millions
parind
rooms
are
fairly
easy
because
it's
still
just
maximum
1000
blocks
or
yeah
maximum
1000
block
drift.
So
that's
that's
still.
Within
a
day,
if
we
enter
the
six
digits,
then
the
drift
might
be
ten
thousand
locks,
which
is
two
days.
R
A
A
A
I
Generally,
I
think
it
was
quite
useful,
I
think
not
just
because
we
we
kind
of
transition
that,
of
course,
somebody
tricked
us
in
terms
of
for
mining,
so
I
guess.
For
me,
the
transition
happened
during
the
night
when
I
was
asleep,
which
was
unfortunate
because
I
wanted
to
see
it,
but
I
think
Martin
has
discovered
some
of
the
kind
of
conversion
to
bugs
or
something
like
that
for
Genesis.
I
E
Not
this
time
around,
no
in
the
in
the
previous
Robson
screw-up,
where
there
were
some
weird
things
happening
and
I
discovered
a
new
kind
of
attack
which
I
don't
really
have
time
to
go
into
in
this
call,
but
I'll
try
to
make
it
good
right
up
and
post
it
somewhere.
So
you
discovered
it
when
we
were
during
the
Derby.
E
I
E
I
I
mean,
of
course,
the
the
fail
of
Derby
was
that
we
were
felt
filled
prey
of
that
miner,
who
was
GPU
mining
Derby
and
because
the
spec
was
publicly
known.
So
we
could
not
control
that
at
all,
so
it
turned
out
to
be,
but
I
think
the
plan
was
to
sort
of
have
kind
of
a
bit
more
mining
during
that
transition.
But
I
don't
think
it
happened.
So
I
don't
know
I'm
not
gonna
push
for
another
rerun
of
it
with
the
secret
specification,
but
I
think
I'm
still
I'd
like
to
think
that
was
useful.
I
E
E
J
H
H
E
S
Working
progress,
so
this
can
be
done
and
with
all
the
money
in
developers
out
there,
you
can
do
this
together.
If
we
want
us
and
I
agree
with
Peter,
that
going
forward
was
proof
of
work,
not
feasible,
and
just
as
lonely,
GPU
miner
on
Derby
just
showed
how
unfeasible
chestnuts
are
the
end,
especially
when
you
talk
about
having
a
test
net
for
applications
not
for
consensus,
needs
I.
H
Yeah,
so
essentially
that
was
my
suggestion
to
you
that
whenever
we
want
to
do
a
hard
fork,
we
can
create
a
purpose-built
test
not
to
specifically
test
the
difficulty
adjustment
or
or
something
like
that.
But
that's
the
only
thing
that
we
kind
of
need
a
proof-of-work.
That's
not
for
for
everything
else.
Proof
Authority
is
possibly
a
saner
approach,
at
least
from
an
app
developer
perspective.
Q
Yeah
you're,
probably
gonna,
want
different
consensus.
Algorithms
within
different
test
nets
for
different
reasons,
but
you
would
want
them
to
be
purpose-built,
of
course,
but
the
issue
is
provisioning
them
and
ensuring
adequate
activity
within
the
network.
I
think
that's
something
that
we
can
address
and
that's
what
that's.
What
we'll
discuss
on
this
yeah.
H
But
my
point
really
is
that
if
we
want
the
purpose-built
test
not
to
test
difficult
the
adjustment,
then
we
don't
need
any
activity.
I
mean
empty
blocks
are
perfectly
fine,
whereas
if
you
want
to
test
any
other
modifications,
then
a
proof
of
authority
test.
That
is
perfect
for
that,
because
that
can
actually
test
everything
else.
F
H
Anyway,
we
definitely
don't
need
to
make
a
decision
about
this
here
and
it's
it's
more
like
just
a
suggestion
that
if
we
want
to
replace
Rob's
done,
it
might
be
a
good
idea
to
maybe
replace
it
liar
proof
of
authority.
That's
not,
but
everyone
please
think
about
it,
and
if
somebody
has
a
really
good
such
good,
really
good
reason.
Why
that's
a
horrible
idea,
I
think
everyone
can
agree.
Do
you
consider
it
yeah.
H
I
I
suggest
that
we
go
to,
you
know,
explore
the
option
of
purpose-built
POV
Network
powa
Network
exact,
yes,
and
then
we
come
back.
Maybe
on
the
next
go
and
just
see
whether
this
is
feasible
to
just
have
P
proof-of-work
Network
for
specific
things
and
then,
as
you
said,
feature
and
proof
of
authority
for
other
things.
For
most
of
other
things,
you.
A
Awesome
yeah:
this
is
a
good
topic
for
the
next
meeting
for
sure
so
I
biked,
oh
I,
had
one
other
question
about
Gourley
offeree
I.
Think
there
was
something
more
aetherium
classic
was
going
to
be
compatible
with
it.
Would
that
make
it
bad
to
be
a
public
aetherium
tests
net
if
it
also
has
a
theory
and
classic
on
there,
or
is
that
compatibility,
not
a
problem?
No.
A
A
Okay,
next
up
openness
for
meetings,
I
sent
out
a
tweet
that
I
know
not
everyone's
on
Twitter.
Basically,
there
were
enough
people
who
said
over
my
dead
body
when
it
came
to
having
any
type
of
closed
meetings
that
we're
just
gonna
have
open
meetings
for
now,
because
there
wasn't
as
strong
of
a
inclination
to
have
the
closed
meetings,
at
least
on
here.
A
I,
don't
know
about
in-person
meetings,
yet
just
because
the
techno,
the
technical
feasibility
of
having
those
as
open
as
possible
is
different,
but
as
far
as
these
meetings
go
and
because
we're
not
going
to
really
have
any
more,
what
we're
previously
called
a
theory,
m1x
or
aetherium
main
that
improvement
calls.
We
don't
really
have
any
more
of
those.
The
working
groups
are
created
now
that
I
think
that
just
us
doing
the
same
thing
we've
been
doing
is
gonna,
be
just
fine.
A
E
A
No
yeah
that
should
be
private.
If
you
want
it
to
be
private,
it
can
be
as
private
or
public
as
you
want,
because
that's
not
a
core
dev
meeting
and
that's
something
that
your
people
are
coming
up
with
on
their
own.
So
there
was
some
confusion
around
that
on
Twitter,
but
I
think
it
was
just
people
not
understanding
how
these
meetings
work.
R
R
You
know
I
just
threw
in
chat
that
you
know
we
worry
about
speaking
freely
in
a
public
forum.
We
worry
about
the
press
and
what
they
might
say
and
when
I
was
organizing
anti-war
demonstrations,
we
had
FBI
infiltrators.
We
had
CIA
infiltrators,
we
had
you
know
we
had
oppressed
and
would
accuse
us
of
violence
after
the
police
had
finished
beating
us
up.
So
you
know
I
just
sort
of
shrug
and
go.
This
is
important,
but
really
we
don't
have
that
much
on
the
line.
So
it's
just
isn't
that
hard.
Okay,.
A
E
E
E
J
J
E
Yeah
so
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
there
was
so
there
was
implementations
in
cpp
in
it
hash
in
verifies
for
cash
integrity
and
they
wrote
and
sync
and
then
the
spec
changed
bit
and
guess
and
CBP
updated.
And
now
there
are
and
I
think.
As
far
as
I
know
apparently
heard
you
have
not
yet
implemented.
The
latest
changes
and
oh.
E
E
E
Because
yeah
I
might
might
as
well
take
it
on
the
public
channel.
So
we've
had
some
bit
of
discussions
with
various
people
in
crypto
communities.
One
of
them
is
David
Warwick.
The
creator
of
SIA
and
also
one
has
studied
a
lot
of
assets
and
his
take
on
the
whole
frog
power
and
I'm,
quoting
a
bit
I
gotten
his
approval
to
do
so.
But
I
might
not.
You
know.
I
might
make
some
mistake,
but
my
takeaway
from
what
he
says
is
that
from
how
if
we
were
to
replace
hash
motifs
at
hash
with
Howie.
E
So
his
take
is
that,
although
this
would
bias
by
the
year
or
two,
another
approach
would
be
maybe
to
use
switch,
an
algorithm
which
is
extremely
as
a
Kremlin,
and
that
is
still
an
option
that
we
would
have
so
one
speculation
that
one
might
do
is
that
we
could
adopt
Prague.
How
now
and
if,
from
a
year
from
now,
we
still
don't
have
Google
State.
E
E
Regarding
the
actual
prevalence
of
asacs
on
the
network,
today,
it's
really
hard
to
find
any
numbers.
I
mean
there
have
been
numbers
reported
from
various
sources,
but
it's
none
of
them
can
be
taken,
as
fact,
because
there
are
no
official
records
of
the
number
of
units
sold
or
the
number
of
units
manufactured.
I
I
So
what
are
the
other
things
that
are
slated
for
for
the
theorem,
1.0
and
then
obviously
there's
profile,
which
will
take
some
amount
of
work
and
then
we'll
definitely
be
taking
some
resources
away
from
other
things
and,
secondly,
the
Justin
Drake's
interview
for
the
century
Bitcoin
or
whatever?
It's
called
Center
right
now.
So
when
he
is
saying
that
the
reason
why
Foundation
and
the
others
wants
to
develop
the
PDF
ASIC
is
because
they
want
to
basically
develop
as
best
as
they
can
do
so
that
another
potential
person
up
another
potential.
I
They
cannot
get
any
like
super
advantage
by
by
creating
something
much
much
better,
because
it's
simply
not
possible
to
create
something
much
much
better.
So
and
I'm
really
glad
that
Martin
Lee
mentioned
that
as
well,
that
there
is
a
downside,
so
there
potentially
there
there
is.
There
is
another
side
of
the
coin,
so
I
I
wanted
to
be
able
to
detect
people
to
explore
both
of
them
and
just
don't
be
an
eccentric
and
one
thing
yeah.
Thank
you.
A
Yeah,
thanks
for
the
thorough
explanation,
Martin
and
just
to
make
it
clear
for
those
listening
like
Martin
said,
Prague
POW
has
not
been
decided
is
something
we
are
definitely
putting
in
or
doing
same
with
any
of
the
working
groups
we
discussed
today.
Besides
the
simulation
one,
and
probably
the
II
was
someone
just
because
those
are
non-controversial
things
that
are
more
than
likely
gonna
go
in
state
rent
and
any
kind
of
log
related
working
group
that
Peters
doing
it's
not
final.
O
Tying
together
two
threads,
we
spoke
about
launching
a
new
Testament
earlier
and
whether
it
should
be
proof
of
authority
or
proof
of
work
and
Pavel
and
Martin
just
mentioned
that
they
may
want
to
may
be
ready
to
spin
up
a
proof-of-work
test
net
using
Prague.
How
soon
this
may
be
way
out
there.
But
would
it
make
any
sense
to
for
that
new
test
net
that
new
app
test
net
to
be
a
prompt?
Our
proof
of
work,
test
net.
E
J
Yeah,
moreover,
we
want
to
actually
have
a
Testament
that
has
a
suite
from
one
algorithm
to
the
other
in
the
middle.
So
it's
not
pure
progbar.
It
will
be
like
if
half
first
and
then
prog
file
or
maybe
even
like
switching
back
and
forth
many
times
on
the
way.
If,
if
client
configurations
would
allow
that,
so
it's
I
think
it's
bad
idea
to
mix
like
tested
for
doctors.
Think
with
this
one.
Actually,
then,.
E
A
Okay,
I
have
a
quick
announcement,
myself,
Lane
Danny
Piper
an
offer
II
have
been
getting
a
group
together,
a
an
internal
group
that
is
bringing
together
people
who
are
interested
and
coordination
and
project
management
related
roles
in
the
etherium
ecosystem.
Some
of
them
are
going
to
be
coordinating
hard
Forks
with
people
like
myself
and
offeree.
A
So
teams
that
need
a
project
manager
can
kind
of
be
introduced
to
these
people
and
maybe
reach
out
to
them
too.
So
if
they
want
a
job,
so
I
think
it's
a
good
initiative
and
I
think
it's
hopefully
gonna
be
really
successful
and
we're
gonna
work
really
hard
to
get
them
more
integrated
and
to
these
calls,
and
do
it
in
a
way
that
supports
the
core
developers
and
doesn't
apply
any
more
pressure.
A
All
right,
the
date
for
the
next
meeting
the
holidays
are
coming
up
in
a
couple
of
weeks.
It'll
be
the
21st
and
stuff
like
Christmas
is
on
the
25th
I,
don't
think,
there's
gonna
be
anything
but
new
releases
for
the
fork
number
between
now
and
then
so,
unless
something
radical
happens,
do
we
want
to
just
skip
that
because
people
will
be
on
vacation
and
stuff.
O
A
Great,
in
that
case,
yeah
we'll
just
do
January,
4th
and
yeah.
Everyone
enjoy
their
break
and
yeah.
If
there's
anything
else,
have
it
in
the
coordinates.
Channel
have
it
on
the
working
group,
chats
and
The
Magicians
and
we're
gonna
give
back
about
half
an
hour
today.
So
thanks
everybody
have
a
great
holidays.