►
Description
This week the EOS Fireside community discusses the beauty of EOS Memes, EVM Ideathon and Hackathon, ENF funding, the pros and cons of deploying stable coins and more!
00:00:00 Big community shout out by Patrick
00:01:24 Welcome to Fireside and this weeks topics by Stephane
00:02:35 Road to 10k leaderboard by Stephane
00:04:29 Pop Token article and token backed NFTs by Stephane
00:10:25 EOS Memes by Stephane, Martin
00:12:40 EVM Ideathon and Hackathon update by Chris, Stephane
00:29:55 Yield+ and rewards are live! by Stephane, Chris
00:41:23 Pros and Cons of using stable coins to back assets by Dan, Zack
00:45:28 POS vs POW by Stephane, Shanzz, Chris, Zack, Areg, Yves
00:53:09 Do stable coins cause increased regulation by Ceskam, Yves
00:58:13 How does the ENF get funding for projects by Shanzz, Yves
01:01:23 ENF is going to Singapore and South Korea by Yves
01:04:00 What is a pop (proof of participation) token by Stephane, Yves
01:05:36 Bringing in VC’s and partnerships back to EOS by Yves
01:28:00 Bigger community shout out by Patrick
01:29:43 Should we rebrand the EOS token ticker by Yves, Marty
01:40:17 EOS is being recognized as undervalued by Chris, Yves, Patrick
01:43:55 Go EOS!
// EOS Network Foundation //
https://eosn.foundation
https://twitter.com/EosNFoundation
https://www.linkedin.com/company/eos-network-foundation
https://t.me/EOSNetworkFoundation
https://discord.gg/eos-network
info@eosn.foundation
#EOS #EOSIO #enf
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much,
chris.
That's
a
pleasure
to
be
with
you
today
and
hello.
Stefan,
I
just
want
to
be
very
brief
here.
I
want
to
do
a
shout
out
to
dancing
joy,
felix
ruiz,
chris,
chris
barnes,
jorge
ramos,
all
the
lenny
mel,
all
the
people
that
were
today
into
the
eden,
fractal
event
and
at
13
utc
every
wednesday,
the
eden
fractal.
A
B
Today
is
august
31st
and
we're
here
like
we
are
every
week
talking
with
the
eos
community
talking
about
the
current
events
and
the
news
that
happened
in
the
last
seven
days.
So,
let's
so
today
on
the
agenda,
it's
actually
a
short
agenda.
We
may
not
go
two
hours,
but
we
may
surprise
ourselves
as
well.
B
We've
got
the
road
10k
article
that
came
out
yesterday,
talking
about
the
discord
server
actually
and
how
we
recently
reached
5
000
members
and
how
we're
throwing
out
some
incentives
for
the
next
5
000
members.
So
we'll
be
talking
a
bit
about
that
also
going
over
the
pop
token
article
that
was
released
two
weeks
ago,
a
few
updates
on
there,
we'll
I'll
invite
you
guys
to
share
the
eos
me
magic.
B
That's
been
going
around
the
last
few
weeks
in
the
eos
community,
some
great
memes
out
there
would
love
for
you
guys
to
share
those
in
the
chat
today
and
then
we've
got
some
hackathon
updates
from
chris
and
the
yield
plus
pilot
phase
is
live,
so
danny
will
jump
on
or
maybe
denise
will
not
jump
on
this
week.
But
we'll
be
quickly
talking
about
that.
So
starting
off
the
the
show
today
wrote
to
10k
so
building
the
eos
community
server
discord.
B
B
B
So
that's
definitely
nice
to
see
a
lot
of
work
has
been
done.
You
know
on
coin
market
cap
coin,
gecko:
all
of
these
places
are
now
pointing
to
the
correct
places
instead
of
to
the
old
eos
links,
and
so
this
discord
server
is
getting
a
lot
more
attention
lately,
which
we
love
to
see
all
right.
So,
of
course,
I
invite
you
guys
to
read
the
article
nothing
too
crazy
about
it.
B
Just
make
sure
you
create
that
custom
link,
and
then
you
know,
share
it
with
friends
and
on
social
media,
invite
people
to
join
the
the
eos
discord
server
and
invite
them
to
join
this.
These
fireside
chats
love
to
see
you
guys
in
here
and
we're
always
getting
new
people
in
these
chats,
which
is
also
great
to
see.
B
B
So
you
go
to
the
pop
bot
chat
here
on
this
card,
and
you
write
your
eos
account
name
with
a
money
sign
in
front
of
it,
and
then
you
get
to
accumulate
pop
tokens,
which
you
can
blend
four
of
into
a
monthly
raffle
ticket.
So
I've
just
shared
the
link
down
there
in
the
stream
chat
for
those
who
want
to
blend
their
pop
tokens
for
a
raffle
ticket.
B
Allowing
people
to
you
know
keep
their
prize
in
their
in
their
personal
collection
for
for
street
cred,
or
you
know,
burn
it
and
and
bank
that
10
eos
for
whatever
they
want
to
do
with
that
tiny
house
right.
So
it's
actually
we're
probably
not
going
to
be
able
to
continue
using
those
that
format
to
distribute
the
price.
B
We're
probably
just
going
to
have
to
send
straight
eos
to
you
guys,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
because
atomic
hub
has
some
legal
concerns
regarding
backed
assets
on
their
platform,
and
so,
while
the
capacity
to
back
these
assets
back,
these
nfts
with
tokens
like
eos
or
wax,
will
still
be
possible
on
the
contract
level.
So
you
can
still
go
through
blocks,
you
know,
or
through
command
line
or
through
the
bounty
block
tool
and
back
your
assets.
B
That
way,
however,
the
atomic
hub
user
interface
is
not
going
to
show
them,
which
kind
of
ruins
the
whole
point,
in
my
opinion,
so
they're
doing
this
because
backed
assets
are
actually
not
used
very
much.
They
have
very
low
usage
compared
to
all
of
the
other
types
of
nfts
that
exist
out
there
so
and
then
there's
some
legal
considerations
where
nfts
may
be
considered
regulated
differently
in
the
crypto
space
compared
to
fungible
tokens
like,
for
example,
wax
or
eos
or
bitcoin
right.
B
So
because
of
these
potential,
you
know,
regulations
coming
down
the
atomic
cup
team
prefers
to
just
avoid
that
headache
and
just
phase
out
the
back
to
assets
from
from
their
platform.
So
that's
going
to
impact
a
bit
how
we
distribute
our
prices,
which
is
too
bad,
because
I
really
enjoyed
these.
These
trophies,
backed
with
eons,
that
we
were
able
to
hand
out
anyways
not
too
big,
of
a
deal,
but
I
figured
I'd
mention
it.
D
B
There
is
there
is,
I
don't
have
the
link
super
handy
right
now,
but
jonah
from
atomic
hub
did
do
a
interview
recently
and
on
youtube,
and
I
watched
it
earlier
today,
the
clip.
Let
me
I'm
gonna,
find
it
real,
quick
and
I'll
share
in
the
chat
there,
when
I
do,
but
there's
not
too
much
information
known
yet
outside
of
what
I
just
shared
and
but
there
is
what
did
they
say.
B
D
Yeah
we
started
backing
nfts
for
the
eden
fractal
with
eos,
and
we
found
that
as
a
great
way
to
like.
In
a
way,
I
would
envisioning
it
as
adding
tvl
to
eden
so
you're,
locking
up
the
tokens
into
the
nft
and
then
that's
a
way
to
see
like
hey.
You
know,
eden.
Members
were
serious
about
eos
for
the
long
haul
and
and
we're
locking
up
eos
tokens
into
our
nft.
So
that's
kind
of
unfortunate,
but
we'll
find
an
alternative.
B
What's
the
okay
cac
here
in
the
chat
asks,
what's
the
difference
between
tokens
coins
and
backed
nfts,
the
nft's
worthless
just
has
the
value
of
the
underlying
coins
sounds
ridiculous.
Yeah,
it's
yeah,
I
mean
you
know.
Then
we
can
go.
We
can
debate
the
merits
of
this
regulation
or
how
to
interpret
what
is
a
fungible
token,
what
is
a
non-fungible
token,
etc
and
stuff?
I
guess
I
guess
those
are.
Those
would
be
good
questions
to
ask
the
atomic
hub
team
on
friday.
B
B
All
right,
yeah,
so
eos
memes
I've
seen
a
lot
of
you
guys
in
here
sharing
some
great
memes
in
the
last
week
or
two
about
eos.
You
know
we
are
streaming.
This
show
on
twitter
on
youtube
on
facebook,
and
the
way
yana
has
it
set
up
is
that
the
stream
chat
is
part
of
what
you
see
when
you
watch
this
stream,
so
for
those
that
can't
be
in
discord
with
us.
Although
I
encourage
you
to
join
us
on
discord,
you
know
you
can
still
watch
us
on
these
other
streams.
E
B
Absolutely
we
had,
we
had
dave
on
our
team
actually
get
in
there
and
remaster
a
meme
earlier
this
week,
which
he
he
loved
the
meme,
but
it
was
too
low
quality
for
his
standards,
so
we
gotta
got
in
there
and
remastered
at
high
def
was
really
great.
Maybe
we
can
share
that
one
with
eva
riding
on
the
shark
blasting
away
and
everything.
F
F
One
direction
in
terms
of
the
enemy
here
and
all
of
crypto
should
be
aligned
against
the
regulators
because
they
slow
things
down,
I'm
working
on
something
right
now
that
will
be
very
beneficial,
and
it's
now
stuck
at
this
kyc
aml
piece,
and
how
do
you
kind
of
solve
this
problem
and
it
yeah?
You
need
to
be
creative
and
do
some
workarounds
but
kind
of
sucks
to
hear
that
it's
affecting
something
like
atomic
acid
and
hub
anyway,
okay
evm
ex
ideathon.
F
This
is
the
big
event
coming
up.
I
hope
everyone
is
getting
excited
the
it's
going
to
go
live
on
september
19th,
so
that
is
when
the
event
will
kick
off.
So
we've
got
that
settled
so
put
it
on
your
calendar.
It's
going
to
be,
it's
got
two
tracks,
so
it's
got
the
idea-a-thon
track,
which
is
essentially
an
idea,
so
it
makes
it
really
easy.
F
This
is
a
super
low
barrier
to
entry,
zero
code
requirement
to
actually
participate
in
a
hackathon,
so
I
know
there's
a
ton
of
folks
on
this
call
who
have
probably
wanted
to
do
hackathons
and
first
of
all,
it's
been.
You
need
to
show
up
at
a
physical
location,
that's
resolved.
This
is
virtual
and
you
may
not
think
of
yourself
as
a
developer
and
think
that
you
know
you
need
to
be
a
developer
in
order
to
participate
in
a
hackathon.
Well,
here's
your
chance!
You
do
not
need
to
be
one!
F
F
What
their
go
to
market
strategy,
how
they're
gonna
acquire
customers
just
some
of
the
questions
that
a
lot
of
projects?
Maybe
don't
quite,
do
the
diligence
that
that
are
required
to
really
build
a
profitable,
long-term,
sustainable
business.
So
we're
gonna
provide
that
to
all
the
winners,
some
of
the
other
details.
So
in
general,
it's
an
eight-week
event.
So
when
it
opens
on
september,
19th
registrations
will
open
and
we'll
do
an
opening
ceremony
describing
the
event
getting
everybody
familiar
with
how
it's
going
to
work
where
you
go
to
sign
up.
F
If
you
can't,
if
you
want
to
have
a
team
and
you
haven't
been
able
to
find
one,
there's
a
way
to
do
that
so
that'll
happen
and
then,
throughout
the
six
weeks
of
the
event
itself,
where
you
have
six
weeks
to
work
on
your
project,
your
proposal
for
both
tracks
that
and
that
they'll
be
due
on
october
31st.
So,
but
during
those
six
weeks,
we'll
be
having
a
series
of
basically
seminars,
so
the
seminars
will
there'll
be
five
of
them
in
total
and
they're,
more
specifically
kind
of
focused
on
the
ideathon
track.
F
F
Fi
so
and
game
fight
can
mean
many
things
to
many
people,
but
in
the
end
it's
it's
sort
of
basically
play
to
earn
application
where
the
users-
let's
see,
what's
my
definition
here,
player
and
blockchain
games
based
blockchain
games
that
provide
mechanics
to
yield
economic
incentive
for
players
to
play
and
interact
with
the
game.
So
that's
what's
going
to
be
for
the
trustee
vm
side
and
then,
of
course,
the
ideathon
we're
gonna
we're
looking.
We
haven't
quite
settled
in
on
the
categories
for
the
ideathon,
but
stay
tuned
for
next
week.
We'll
drop
some
alpha.
F
If
you
want
a
bit
of
a
head
start
to
get
your
brain
churning
on
what
ideas
you
could
focus
on
next
week's
fireside
chat,
we
will
announce
the
the
four
or
five
categories
with
descriptions.
So
a
little
extra
alpha
for
our
community
that
others
won't
get
and
then,
like
I
said,
we'll,
have
throughout
the
event
itself.
F
There'll
be
five
different
seminars
and
these
will
be
a
live
sort
of
like
a
just
a
zoom
link
or
I
think
what
I'm
doing
on
youtube
would
be
live
interacting
with
the
comments
we'll
do
a
design
thinking
workshop,
which
is
sort
of
something
step,
one
if
you're
thinking
about
an
idea.
What
are
the
do's
and
don'ts
of
coming
up
with
an
idea
that
could
be
turned
into
an
actual
project,
so
that'll
be
step.
One
then
we'll
do
an
eos,
slash,
antelope,
technical
overview.
F
That
will
be
because,
even
though
your
idea
doesn't
need
to
have
any
code,
one
of
the
judging
criteria
is
feasibility.
Like?
Can
you
actually
build
this
thing?
Can
it
be
built
on
eos
or
or
antelope,
and
so
that
something
you
will
need
to
kind
of
factor
into
your
idea?
So,
even
though
there's
no
code
required,
you
do
kind
of
need
to
have
some
sort
of
semblance
of
feasibility
that
can
actually
be
built
and
we'll
do
a
tokenomics
gamification
workshop.
F
So
folks
can
get
more
acquainted
with
the
ideas
of
if
you
are
going
to
include
a
token
and
taking
taking
advantage
of
that
aspect
of
a
blockchain
tokens,
then
that
will
give
you
a
high
level
view
of
that.
To
consider
in
your
idea
then.
Finally,
we'll
do
a
pitch
deck
workshop,
which
is
the
the
whole
idea-thon
is
going
to
culminate
in
a
live
sharks,
tank
style
event
where
folks
will
present
live
to.
F
F
So
we'll
do
a
session
on
a
pitch
deck
workshop
and
then
there'll
also
be
an
initial
session
on
community
development
and
marketing,
and
so,
as
you
want
to
consider
how
you're
going
to
acquire
customers
and
who
is
your
target
customer
and
how
you're
going
to
build
out
this
idea
if
it
was
to
get
built.
This
will
help
you
there.
So
that's
quite
a
bit
and
I
don't
want
to
give
away
too
much
of
the
details.
F
B
That
was
great.
That
was
a
fantastic
update.
You
got
me
pretty
excited.
This
sounds
like
an
amazing
event,
actually
a
little
bit
of
something
for
everyone
developers,
non-developers
people
who
just
want
to
learn
all
these
great
workshops
you
guys
are
putting
on
super
valuable
skills
in
the
crypto
industry
and
or
just
just
for
people
who
are
interested
in
these
topics,
and
not
necessarily
even
people
who
are
building
projects
so
yeah
sounds
like
sounds
like
a
really
really
great
event.
Looking
forward
to
it,.
F
And
you
know
what
I
should
do
I
want
to
just
say
thanks,
because
this
was
and
is
really
a
community
originated
idea,
and
this
whole
thing
big
thanks
to
phoenix,
also
he's
john
paul
here
and
discord
he's
the
guy
who
kicked
this
all
off.
He
built
out
a
whole,
really
well
done
framework
so
kudos
to
you,
dude,
like
you,
you
thanked
me,
but
really
we
need
to
thank
you
because
you're.
F
B
Yeah
great
stuff,
great
stuff,
yeah
I
I
might
actually
have
to
now
join
and
participate.
I
I
remember
many
months
ago
I
said
oh
that'd
be
great
to
have
a
hackathon
for
peop
for
non-devs
like
myself
to
participate
in
and
then
when
you
were
talking
explaining
all
the
things
it's
like.
Oh
I'm
gonna
have
to
join
now
and
I
was
like
oh
do
I
have
time,
I'm
pretty
busy.
I
don't
know,
and
then
I
was
like.
Maybe
I
won't
join,
but
then,
but
then
I
actually
do
want
to
present
a
sharks
tank
style.
B
B
F
I
think
I
think
they're
all
public,
so
we're
using
devpost
as
the
as
a
platform,
so
I'm
pretty
sure
they're
all
there
and
what
we'd
like
to
do
is
during
those
two
weeks
when
we're
deliberating
as
judges,
we
don't
want
them
to
be
dead
air
time,
so
we
want
to
kind
of
really
like
this
is
the
idea.
This
is
our
first
attempt
at
this
kind
of
want
to
make
it
a
big
event,
and
so,
during
that
two-week
judging,
I
think
we'd
like
to
do
some
like
almost
live
review.
F
I
C
B
F
B
B
F
F
This
is
our
most
loyal
group,
so
you
guys
get
the
extra
time
to
think
about
your
ideas,
but
there
will
be
four
or
five
categories
with
the
intention
of
making
them
basically
as
broad
as
possible,
because
the
whole
one
of
the
big
things
here,
part
of
the
eos
comeback,
is
bringing
back
the
eyeballs
of
people
who
are
outside
of
our
community
who
have
sloughed
eos
off
and
we
want
to.
We
want
people
to
come
back
with
a
fresh
look.
So
that's
why?
F
F
F
B
B
H
K
F
I
think
I
got
some
of
that.
You
broke
up
a
bit,
basically
so
the
judges.
This
is
I'm
glad
you
brought
up
judges
in
the
pre-judging,
so
the
final
live
judging
session.
We'll
have
I've
got
we've
got
judges
selected
for
that,
however,
prejudging
will
be
something
that
I'm
open
to
receiving
if
people
think
they
want
to
be
a
judge
to
help
out,
because
we
might
end
up.
If
this
is
successful,
we
could
have
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
of
entrants,
which
is
what
we
want
right.
F
So
there's
an
opportunity
to
select
a
few
trusted
community
members
to
assist
with
that.
Judging
if
you're
interested
in
maybe
being
a
judge,
shoot
me
a
pm
and
I'm
open
to
collecting
some
some
folks
in
the
community
to
assist
with
that
in
terms
of
randomly
picking
winners.
That
will
not
happen.
There's
no
chance
we're
gonna
we're
gonna
pick,
especially
because
it's
live
for
the
idea
thought
so
that
would
be
pretty
sketch.
If
we
just
flip
a
dice.
C
F
Yeah,
so
there
will
be
criteria,
that's
what
I
was
saying.
So
I'm
gonna
we're
gonna,
announce
the
categories
next
week
and
then
probably
the
criteria
the
week
after
but
most
certainly
there
will
be
specific
deliberate
criteria
for
both
the
trust,
edm
hackathon
and
the
ideathon.
So
they
won't
be
quite
the
same
between
the
two
tracks,
but
absolutely
there
will
be
criteria
that
will
have
a
weighted
voting
based
on
each
criteria.
J
Hey
this
is
this
is
andrew,
aka
drew
block.
I
just
wanted
to
say
what
I
said
earlier,
but
without
two
people
speaking
at
the
same
time,
very
stoked
that
the
that
the
ideathon
is
happening,
because
I
think
that's
a
great
way
to
involve
all
sorts
of
people
in
the
eos
ecosystem.
Aren't
necessarily
developers.
B
B
All
right
well
we'll
move
on
to
the
next
topic,
which
is
actually
the
last
topic
on
my
list.
It's
only
it's
only
been
half
an
hour
and
it's
not
even
a
big
topic
really,
but
it's
an
important
one,
there's
just
not
too
much
to
share
about
it,
and
that
is
that
the
yield
plus
program
is
is
now
alive
and
the
the
additional
yield
is
being
distributed
to
the
protocols
that
have
signed
up
and
qualified
so
congrats
congrats
to
the
yield
plus
team.
B
You
know
they,
they
did
a
great
blue
paper,
really
thorough,
maybe
the
one
of
the
most
thorough
blue
papers
or
analysis.
You
know
document
in
all
of
crypto,
researching
these
yield
incentive
programs
and
then
they
were
able
to
deliver
on
this
yield
plus
pr
program
fairly
quickly.
So
it's
great
to
see
you
know
from
from
idea
to
market,
and
now
the
yield
plus
program
is
live
and
the
extra
rewards
are
being
distributed
to
the
protocols.
B
F
I
was
it's
too
bad
that
he's
not
here,
because
I
wanted
to
ask,
I
noticed,
like
defy
box,
has
four
separate
individually
qualifying
applications.
I
guess
out
of
the
seven
that
are
there
so
far,
and
I
was
wondering
if
that
is.
Was
that
like
intended,
that
a
single
a
single
project
like
defy
box
could
have
multiple
recipient
aspects
to
pull
into
that,
because
I
think.
F
B
G
Can
stop
it's
the
opposite,
so
it's
not
the
d5
application.
It's
the
d5
protocol,
so
a
single
under
the
umbrella
of
a
single
application.
There
could
be
multiple
protocols
in
multiple
strategies.
So
it's
really
there.
Each
protocol
has
its
own
unique
smart
contract.
It
has
its
own
unique
deposit.
Con
account,
that's
being
tracked
with
the
the
time-based
oracles
and
that
that's
kind
of
why?
Because
you
could
launch
all
of
the
they're
all
separate
products.
G
They
don't
like
interface
with
each
other
directly
like
d5
box
swap
is
the
swap,
so
that's
only
calculating
the
usdt
and
the
eos
in
their
swap
pools
and
then
d5
box.
Usn
is
stable.
Coin
generation,
so
minting
stable
coins
against
eos
collateral.
So
for
that
one
just
eo's
collateral
in
in
the
pool
that's
minting,
stable
coins
is
being
calculated.
G
So
that's
denny
could
probably
explain
this
much
better
than
I.
But
that's
the
general
idea
is
that
they're
all
separate
products
they
just
happen
to
all
live
under
the
same
umbrella
and
any
other
protocol
or
any
other
application,
would
be
able
to
do
the
same
thing
if
they
had
multiple
protocols,
so
they
get
rewarded
four
times
but
like
if
you
combined
all
of
their
tvl,
you
would
get
the
same
number.
So
it
really
will
matter.
G
G
Yeah
so
dfs,
I
think,
has
some
lending
products
and
things
like
that,
so
they
it
really
depends
on
also
how
modular
that
their
like
cool
sys
ecosystem
is.
So
I
don't
know
why
dfs
I
haven't
been
following
them
too
closely,
but
I
know
they
have
a
lending
product,
for
example,
which
is
separate
from
their
swap.
So
I'm
I
could
ask
denis
about
that,
but
any
any
project
that
has
multiple
smart
contracts,
multiple
deposit
accounts,
there's
essentially
separate
products.
G
I
mean
it's
the
only
tvl,
that's
counting
for
new
decks
would
be
or
like.
Since
it's
order
book
driven,
you
would
have
to
have
like
limit
orders
on
file
and
those
are
probably
what's
being
calculated
as
their
tvl
so
like.
If
you
have
buy
limit
orders
using
eos
or
usdt,
or
still
limit
orders
with
eos
or
usdt.
F
G
Yeah,
because
otherwise
the
eos
is
like
in
your
account
like,
if
you
wanted
to
buy
a
box
token
off
nudex
like
your
tokens,
either
in
your
wallet
or
you
set
like
a
limit
order
and
you're
waiting
for
the
price
to
like
go
down
or
up
so
you.
It
triggers
your
order.
That
would
be
the
only
way
that
your
tvl
would
count
on
new
decks.
B
J
G
I
don't
so
it
really.
I
don't
know
the
idea
with
using
only
the
the
hardest
assets
are
they're
really
hard
to
inflate
or
manipulate
so
like
any
native
token,
on
eos,
for
example,
doesn't
probably
have
the
liquidity
depth
to
really
not
be
easily
manipulated
and
moved,
and
also
there
was
a
considered
effort
to
not
include
derivative
assets
because
derivative
assets,
you
could
essentially
turn
one
dollar
into
ten
dollars
of
tvl
and
like
there
was
a
big
story.
A
couple
weeks
ago
about
the
solana
defy
ecosystem.
G
How
like
out
of
10
billion
dollars
of
tvl,
it
was
really
only
like
2
billion.
It
was
just
being
like
token,
like
tvl
is
being
counted
multiple
times
because
of
a
derivative
token.
So
a
good
example
is
if,
if
I
deposit,
eos
collateral
into
pizza,
lend
I
get
a
a
token
back,
a
pz
eos
token,
which
is
like
it's
redeemable
one
to
for
eos,
because
it's
just
like
a
receipt
token
like
it
just
signifies
that
I
deposited
neos
into
the
lending
contract.
So
the
eos
in
that
lending
contract
is
already
being
calculated.
G
As
you
start,
adding
new
whitelist
tokens
like
if
you
added
a
derivative
token
like
pz
pizza
and
there
was
utility
and
you
could
like-
had
a
swap
pool
liquidity.
It's
really
not
new
tvl.
It's
like
a
derivative
of
another
tvo,
so
that's
kind
of
like
a
house
of
cards
that
you'll
see
in
a
lot
of
other
defy
ecosystems,
and
it's
really
gameable.
G
So
that
was
kind
of
the
reason
to
stick
to
hard
assets.
I
would
assume
that
the
evm
token
would
likely
be
whitelisted
and
then,
like
wrapped-
and
I
don't
have
timelines
on
any
of
this,
but
I
think,
like
the
first
other,
the
first
whitelisted
assets
you'll,
see
beyond
those
would
be
like
a
wrapped
bitcoin
or
like
a
wrapped,
aetherium
or
or
another
hard
asset
with
like
a
reputable
bridge.
G
That's
doing
the
wrapping.
So
not,
I
guess
that's
the
answer.
I
don't
have
a
date
on
the
timelines,
but
as
far
as
like
adding
the
assets,
it's
it's
really
just
sticking
to
really
hard
assets,
staying
away
from
derivatives
and
staying
away
from
tokens
with
like
limited
supply
and
limited
liquidity,
where
you
could
really
kind
of
manipulate
the
prices
on
them,
because
then
you'd
only
be
rewarding
like
this
inflated
tvl
instead
of
the
tvl.
That
is
actually
important.
That's
locked,
eos
and
usdt
is
also
equally
important.
K
K
With
like
issues
like
the
merge
and
stuff
like
that.
So
I
think
that's
something.
That's
that's
also
good
to
keep
in
mind
too.
I
think
that
in
the
long
run,
it's
probably
best
to
incentivize
people
to
stake
eos
as
opposed
to
a
stable
coin,
which
yes,
community,
doesn't
have
control
over.
Really,
but
that's
also,
maybe
just
just
more
of
a
long-term
thing
to
keep
in
mind
as
well.
G
K
C
K
I
think
it
could
be
kind
of
like
a
balance
between,
like,
like
independence
and,
like,
I
suppose,
collaboration
or
like
just
potential
to
grow
at
some
extent
because
like
if
you
are
able
to
get
people
to
stay
eos
as
opposed
to
usd,
then
that
gives
the
eos
community
more
independence,
but
obviously
there's
lots
of
derivatives
and
stable,
clean
and
stuff
like
that.
So
it's
just
a
good
thing
to
keep
in
mind
too.
I
think
to
try
to
find
the
right
balance
going
forward.
B
Oh
pretty
easy
question
proof
of
stake
or
proof
of
work.
I
mean
personally,
my
personal
beliefs
on
that
is,
I
think,
there's
going
to
be
one
proof
of
work
chain
that
remains
standing,
that's
gonna,
be
bitcoin
and
all
other
chains
are
gonna,
be
proof
of
stake
of
some
sort.
That's
my
opinion
on
that.
You'll
have
to
hear
other
opinions
on
it.
I.
L
B
Personally,
I'm
satisfied
with
the
level
of
security
that
proof
of
stake
seems
to
bring,
doesn't
seem
like
it's
it.
It's
had
any
any
flaws
so
far,
but
at
the
same
time,
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
crypto
space,
I
think
it's
important
to
have
different
consensus
mechanisms
to
have
you
know
backups.
Let's
say
if
one
of
these
consensus
algorithm
fails.
F
This
question
to
me
always
comes
back
to
the
use
cases,
and
so,
if
your
use
case
is
hard
money
and
that's
the
only
thing
you
care
about
when
it
comes
to
blockchain,
then
there's
probably
a
strong
argument
that
proof
of
work
is
likely
better.
But
if
you're
exploring
other
use
cases
which
we
should
definitely
be
doing
in
our
ideathon,
you,
then
you
might
need
more
performance.
You
need
half
a
second
blocks
and
faster
finality
and
greater
throughput.
The
ability
to
update
code,
like
all
of
the
things
that
eos
can
do
and
antelope
makes
possible.
F
That
comes
with
a
trade-off.
So
again,
it
just
kind
of
depends
on
your
use
case
and
whether
you
need
this
hard
immutability
factor
and
that's
you
know
more
like
hard
money.
What
bitcoin
does
versus
the
performant
nature
that
eos
sorry
yeah
eos
slash
antelope.
I
was
about
to
say
the
word
that
can't
be
said.
H
Yeah,
that's
that's
a
good
question.
I
mean
I
mean
you
know
the
trilemma
right,
the
security
decentralization
and
speed.
Do
you
think
every
time
you
have
to
compromise
one
over
the
other
like?
If
you
go
increase
speed,
then
you
give
up
security
and
if
you
go
more
centralized
you
give
up,
you
know
I
mean
speed
or
whatever
it
is.
F
First,
I
I'm
not
a
technologist,
so
someone's
probably
better
to
answer,
but
I
think,
like
most
things
in
life,
everything
is
in
the
gray.
We
just
get
pitted
into
the
binary
black
and
white
left
and
right,
blue
and
red
type
of
mindset,
but
really
life
exists
in
the
gradient
in
the
gray.
So
I
don't
think
you'll
find
the
the
perfect
solution
where
you
want
to
have
your
cake
and
eat
it
too.
L
M
Are
trade-offs,
but
I
think
there's
also
you
know
some
mechanisms
that
have
a
better.
I
guess
what
I'd
call
security
efficiency,
which
I'd
describe
as
like?
How
much
money
do
you
need
to
spend,
in
a
normal
case,
to
increase
the
economic
cost
of
attacks?
And
I
think
proof
of
stake
does
a
better
job
of
that
from
a
game
theoretical
perspective
than
proof
of
work,
and
I
think,
like
vitalik,
has
already
talked
about
this
plenty
of,
like
he's
done
a
great
job
describing
that
you
know
in
a
properly
designed
state.
G
M
G
Yeah
it'd
be
it'd,
be
near
impossible
to
create
a
proof
of
work
chain,
that's
secure
so
like
we
have
ethereum
right,
pre-merged,
ethereum
and
then
bitcoin,
but
there's
other
proof-of-work
coins
out
there,
but
they're
all
really
really
easy
to
attack.
If
you
actually
like
wanted
to
do
so
by
renting
hash
power,
because
the
cost
to
rent
equipment
and
this
cost
is
only
going
to
go
down
once
all
of
the
mining
equipment
for
ethereum
is
freed
up
and
it's
no
longer
being
used.
That
means
all
of
the
equipment.
G
That's
still
available
will
probably
you'll
be
able
to
rent
the
hash
power,
even
cheaper,
so
attacking
any
other
proof
of
work
chain
after
the
merge
will
become
even
cheaper,
so
that
that's
why,
with
with
bitcoin,
it
would
just
cost
a
lot
of
money
to
rent
enough
hash
power
to
to
do
anything
with
it,
but
as
far
as
it
being
making
sense
for
any
other
chain.
Unless
you
could
have
a
market
cap
in
in
the
like.
G
So
an
example
right
now
is
like
lido.
Their
eth
2.0
staking
pool
is
like
40
of
of
the
network,
so
they're
already
almost
over
50.
That's
just
a
single
staking
pool!
That's
why
coinbase
is
launching
their
own
eth
2.0
staking
pools
because
they
they
see
the
issue
lying
ahead
is
everyone's
kind
of
competing
for
the
staking
right.
Now,
it's
almost
all
in
light.
Oh,
so
I
think
what
we'll
see
is
just
like,
with
with
proof
of
work,
where
there's
only
a
limited
number
of
mining
pools
that
kind
of
operate.
G
The
consensus
of
the
network
you're
going
to
see
the
same
thing
with
staking
pools,
but
it's
going
to
be
much
more
obvious
and
if
you're
staking
into
eth
2.0
in
a
proof
of
stake
network
using
lito,
you're,
essentially
doing
delegated
proof
of
stake.
You're
delegating
your
stake
to
light,
oh
and
light
has
taken
to
all
of
the
nodes
that
they're
either
running
infrastructure
for
or
that
their
partners
running
infrastructure.
For
so
it's
it's.
N
Face
eskim
here
with
challenge
dac
and
I
have
a
question
about
the
yield
press
plus
program.
I
I
don't
know
if
anyone
would
have
be
able
to
speak
on
this
or
would
have
the
answer
to
this,
but
for
projects
that
are
dealing
with
a
usd
stable
coin,
is
there
going
to
be
significantly
more
compliance
or
you
know
more
compliance
issues
that
they're
going
to
have
to
deal
with
than
dealing
with
just
tokens
just
say
like
eos
tokens.
O
O
Can
you
expand
on
that
a
little
bit
in
the
sense
that
are
you
saying,
challenge
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
let's
say
you're?
Are
you
saying
challenge
that
is
currently
not
let's
say
listed
on
the
on
the
app
store
and
it
would
want
to
be
and
having
yield
would
potentially
jeopardize
that
or
are
you
saying
you
currently
are
listed
and
adding
that
yield
could
potentially
jeopardize
that
or
neither
of
the
above.
N
O
Bitcoin,
I
don't,
I
don't
know,
that's
a
good
question.
I
think
that
that's
something
on
your
end.
You
should
look
into
because
that
would
be
a
separate
case
by
case
depending
on
the
application
that
would
not.
That
would
really
fall
out
so
out
of
scope
of
yield
plus
and
so
those
that
register
for
yield
plus
are
going
to
be.
O
N
O
B
All
right
is
this
going
to
be
our
shortest
fireside
to
date.
We've
been
we've
been
running
these
since
december
of
last
year,
and
I
think
only
a
few
of
them
have
been
under
two
hours.
We,
of
course,
had
our
epic
seven
hour
long
fireside
chat
that
one
time
was
pretty
legendary,
but
yeah
last
call
for
people.
If
you
want
to
jump
on
here,
say
hi
to
the
community.
Ask
a
question
last
offer
do
that
and
if
not
we're
gonna
wrap
it
up
early
today.
B
O
Sure
that's
a
really
good
question.
Maybe
somebody
wants
to
link
if,
if
possible,
zac
or
steph,
if
you
can
link
the
video
that
we
did
about
this,
it
was
a
short.
I
don't
recall
if
it
was
five
or
six
minute
video
that
really
went
into
details,
but
the
tldr
is
the
block
producers
reignited
or
ignited.
I
should
say
inflation
going
into
the
saving
account
roughly
a
year
ago
and
that
inflation
drips
at
a
two
percent
rate.
The
it
goes
into
eosio.saving.
O
O
In
the
blog
section,
the
last
quarterly
report
was
q2.
2022
came
the
second
week
of
july,
we're
currently
working
on
q3
2022,
which
should
be
coming
about
the
second
week
or
so
of
october.
Thank
you
very
much.
Steph
and
that'll
give
you
an
idea
of
not
only
where
the
funds
are
going,
but
why
they're
going
there?
What
are
the
initiatives
that
we're
working
on
it
talks
about
previous
initiatives
as
well
that
were
funded
and
where
they
are
in
terms
of
status
report,
etc.
O
B
O
Maybe
a
little
bit
of,
I
guess,
follow-up
to
alpha
that
we
gave
last
week
so
last
week.
We
I'm
not
trying
to
drag
this
out,
but
I
do
see
that
we've
got
a
little
bit
more
time,
we're
pretty
short
on
this
one,
and
I
see
that
there's
54
people
still
here
last
week.
I
believe
it
was.
Last
week
I
announced
that
dnf
would
be,
or
I
would
be
personally
going
to
south
korea
to
meet
with
korean
token
holders
korean
developers.
O
O
And
yes,
jana,
just
published
or
just
showed,
the
link
to
the
event
circuit
for
the
next
three
months,
and
so
in
there
I
just
mentioned
singapore,
I'm
not
sure
is,
is
korea
in
there.
I'm
not
sure
korea
is
in
there.
There
is
also
london
token
2049
november,
which
I
will
be
attending
and
outside
of
that
someone
from
bnf
will
be
attending
as
a
mix
match
all
of
those,
and
so
again,
if
we're
nearby,
please
feel
free
to
come
and
say
hi.
O
B
O
So
interesting
little
tidbit
steph,
you
just
mentioned
that
it
is
an
ode
to
the
po
app
tokens
or
pope
or
I'm
not
too
sure
how
to
pronounce
that.
I
was
speaking
with
some
vcs
yesterday
and
they
actually
brought
up
your
pop
token
and
how
they
liked
that
initiative
and
how
it
reminded
them
of
the
po
app
or
pope
token,
and
so
the
pop
token
is
actually
getting
the
eyes
of
these
seas
around
the
blockchain
ecosystem,
no
joke.
O
O
O
The
majority
of
people
do
not
participate
in
these
fireside
chats
every
week
they
don't
spend
24
hours
a
day,
seven
days
a
week,
365
days
a
year
in
eos,
a
lot
of
the
people
that
we
are
not
talking
to
are
outsiders
to
eos.
They
are
outside
of
the
eos
echo
chamber
and
or
bubble,
and
so
the
message
that
we
deliver
to
them
and
or
the
things
that
they
would
like
to
know
about
us
are
very
particular
to
them,
and
I
think
I
mentioned
this
or
I
did
mention
this.
O
If
you
want
to
share
that
early
on
when
the
enf
was
formed,
a
big
part
in
how
you
can
form
partnerships
and
or
how
you
can
create
relationships
is
to
meet
the
other
person
where
they
are,
so
you
don't
expect
them
to
meet
you.
Where
you
are,
you
meet
them
where
they
are
and
once
you're
both
there.
Then
you
can
start
walking
a
path
together,
and
so
people
may
be
questioning
why
we
talk
about
certain
things
or
we
approach
about
certain
subjects
or
that
we,
you
know
that
we
spend
some
time
talking
about.
O
That's
like
the
history
of
of
eos,
because
it
really
depends
where
the
other
person
is.
It
depends
where
that
recipient
is
where
they
are
in
their
journey
and
if
ideally,
we
want
them
to
understand
and
appreciate
and
see
the
value
that
we
have
in
eos.
The
most
effective
way
possible
is
to
meet
them
where
they
are,
and
so
we've
been
having
a
lot
of
calls
with
stakeholders
across
the
ecosystem
inside
of
the
os.
O
That
is
one
of
the
you
know,
messages
that
we
we
get
when
we
reach
out
to
people.
Another
narrative
that
we
hear
is
that
they
associate
eos
to
being
a
scam,
and
it's
really
important
to
address
that,
because
you
can't
you
know
that
was
a
narrative
and
that
is
branding.
That
is
real.
That
is
something
that
we
needed
to
address.
O
That
is
something
that
we
needed
to
confront
early
on
with
the
enf,
and
although
the
majority
of
the
people
on
this
call
have
heard
this
a
year
or
so
ago,
some
people
are
just
hearing
this
for
the
first
time,
and
so
if
the
idea
was
that
it
was
that
the
the
the
patient
eos
a
year
ago
was
this
just
dying
patient
on
the
floor.
People
are
walking
by
kicking
and
spitting
on
it.
Things
have
changed
considerably.
Since
then,
the
patient
has
now
been
stabilized.
The
patient
is
now
walking.
O
O
A
lot
of
the
foundations
and
no
no
pun
intended
have
been
laid
and
eos
now
finds
itself
in
a
position
where
the
patient
is
stable.
A
lot
of
that
first
year
was
all
about
stability,
creating
stability,
putting
eos
back
in
the
position
where
it
should
have
been
four
years
ago,
and
it
doesn't
matter
why
it
wasn't
there
so
much
so
because
we
could
talk
about
that
at
length.
O
It
was
kind
of
the
default,
and
so
we
had
to
go
out
to
stakeholders
talk
to
them
understand
what
brought
them
here
in
the
first
place,
perhaps
four
years
ago
understand
where
maybe
there
were
trends
and
patterns
in
terms
of
why
people
originally
had
an
inkling
for
eos
and
why
they
wanted
to
dedicate
their
their
time
and
or
their
their
their
assets
to
eos.
And
so
we
started
seeing
buckets
form.
O
We
started
seeing
patterns
and
trends
on
what
really
attracted
people
over
and
that's
really
what
formed
the
base
of
our
priorities
and
that's
what
we
started
working
on
and
for
the
first
little
while
I'd
say
five
months
or
so
it
was
very
difficult
to
actually
get
anybody
on
the
phone.
A
lot
of
people
just
weren't
interested
they'd
been
burned
in
the
past
for
whatever
reason,
and
they
were
just
not
interested
in
in
coming
back.
O
They
were
you
know,
good
riddance
type
of
thing,
and
I
would
say
that
in
the
last
six
months
or
so,
and
maybe
more
so
seven
or
eight
months
or
so
things
started
changing
very
rapidly.
You
saw
first
very
prominently
with
the
coalition
joining
and
so
people
also
question.
Why
is
there
so
much
emphasis
on
the
coalition
we're
supposed
to
be
eos?
We
shouldn't
be
talking
about
others,
you're
missing
the
point.
O
Eos
never
had
allies,
eos
never
had
partners,
it's
incredibly
important
for
an
ecosystem
to
be
able
to
thrive,
to
have
partners
to
have
allies,
to
have
partnerships
and
have
people
where
you're
working
on
a
common
goal
and
you're
able
to
split
that
workload
and
you're
working
towards
a
common
vision.
That
is
incredibly
important
and
that's
incredibly
bullish.
If
you
can
recognize
how
much
value
that
has
and
how
much
space
that
creates
for
eos
to
be
able
to
innovate
and
to
be
able
to
take
its
rightful
respectable
place
again
in
the
top
ranks.
O
We
started
off
in
a
place
and
we've
been
having
to
add
layers
to
this.
We
started
off
very
bare
bones.
The
patient
is
dying,
it's
bleeding
on
the
floor
and
we're
adding
band-aids
to
it
and
then
we're
adding
whatever
it
may
be
to
it,
and
that
one
of
that
first
layers,
that
was
really
important.
Obviously,
the
inner
core
is
the
community.
Having
these
discussions
with
people
on
the
fireside
chat
weekly,
having
a
lot
of
our
meetings
being
recorded,
published
and
and
available
to
all
very
transparently
is
a
part
of
that
too.
O
These
are
buckets
whereby
I
call
them
undirected
funding
where
the
enf
sponsors
the
nf,
provides
the
funds
but
the
actual
fund
deployment
and
the
ultimate
fund
outreach
or
where
the
funds
land
is
directed
by
the
community.
It
really
does
give
the
power
back
into
the
hands
of
the
community
and
the
data
that
we're
gathering
gathering
from
that
is
very,
very
relevant.
O
How
this
is
important
to
these
stakeholders
outside
of
these
outside
of
the
eos
to
the
other
chains
in
the
greater
antelope
family,
and
why,
having
that
antelope
family
is
so
important
for
eos
as
well,
and
why
that
creates
so
much
value
for
eos.
That
was
that
second
layer
and
reaching
out
to
vcs
and
reaching
out
to
external
partners
afterwards
that
let's
say
that
third
layer
give
or
take
or
another
layer
that
you're
adding
to
the
onion
we've
seen
a
significant
shift
in
the
last
couple
of
months
whereby,
a
year
ago,
people
wouldn't
take
her
calls.
O
Six
months
ago,
people
started
taking
our
calls
other
foundations,
other
externals
not
having
to
do
with
eos
other
third
parties.
You
know
outside
of
blockchain
inside
of
blockchain,
but
outside
of
our
you
know
our
own
larger,
let's
say
echo
chamber
within
antelope
and
more
recently
in
the
last
month,
or
so.
O
And
how
we
actually
implement
that
is
all
coming
about,
and
you
guys
get
a
front
seat
at
this
and,
yes,
it
might
not
move
as
quickly
as
you'd
like
and
you're,
watching
the
charts
and
it's
creating
a
lot
of
stress.
It
does
that
for
everybody
outside
of
the
eos
as
well
our
fundamentals
and
what
we've
been
showcasing
that
we've
been
working
on
is
being
captured.
It
is
being
noticed
by
the
outside
we're
starting
to
see
for
the
fir
external
media
report
on
eos
favorably
without
getting
paid
without
getting
prompted.
O
O
The
eos
community
didn't
sit
on
any
liabilities,
which
was
one
of
a
downside,
because
we
didn't
have
partnerships,
but
those
are
now
starting
to
form
and
those
once
they
hit
the
power
and
and
what
they
will
represent,
and
the
amount
of
value
that
they
will
add
will
be
nothing
like
we've
ever
seen
before,
because
we've
never
been
in
this
position
before
eos
was
never
in
a
position
to
make
partnerships
before
this.
This
is
completely
new
that
we've
never
had
that
opportunity
and
I'll
end
with
that.
B
C
E
I
can't
take
this.
I
can't
take
this.
It's
thanks,
steph,
but
yeah.
The
designer
sharmona
shout
out
to
her
as
well,
and
as
we
mentioned
before,
we
came
up
to
the
pop
token
because
of
the
pro-app
token,
so
crazy
credit
to
the
people
who
did
the
co-op
token.
It's
just
like
you
know
we
don't
have
as
many
creatives
who
do
for
every
event.
One
design
right
so
the
prohub
token
just
says
design
for
everything,
but
we
might
go
there.
We
wrap
it
up.
E
L
B
P
It
who's
this.
This
is
mel,
eos,
london
and
just
a
question
for
eves.
So
when
you
go
to
the
conferences,
you're
gonna
begin
to
a
fair
few
conferences,
you've
got
lined
up
and
planned.
So
what?
What
is
the
plan?
What
what
are
you
actually
trying
to
achieve?
What's
the
objective,
are
we
going
for
vc
funding?
What
what
is
it
actually
you're
trying
to
achieve
initially.
O
That's
a
really
good
question:
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
we're
attempting
to
achieve
and
are
attempting
to
signal
as
well.
So
it's
not
just
let
me
explain.
Eos
has
not
been
represented
at
any
major
blockchain
conference
now
for
roughly
two
and
a
half
three
years
when
the
enf
launched
when
zac-
and
I
first
started
this
by
design-
and
I've
mentioned
this
before
we
by
design-
did
not
want
to
attend
conferences
for
multiple
reasons.
O
One
is
we're
a
man
we're
a
team
of
two,
whatever
time
that
we
spend
on
the
road,
and
this
is
incredibly
taxing
and
it
really
puts
everything
else
behind
means
that
we
weren't
working
on
on
the
core
within
the
enf,
and
so
we
just
really
didn't
have
the
time.
That
is
a
huge
reason.
Another
reason,
though,
because
there
were
some
conferences
that
were
geographically
closer
and
wouldn't
be
necessarily
as
logistically
challenging
was
that
if
we
were
to
attend
these
conferences
at
that
time,
what
would
we
be
talking
about?
O
We
would
have
had
very
little
track
record
with
the
enf.
There
would
have
been
very
little
track
record
of
eos
in
the
last.
At
that
time.
Let's
say
in
the
last
year,
two
years
or
so
so
the
there
would
have
been
very
little
to
showcase
or
to
talk
about
or
to
to
get
people
excited
about
and
to
get
them
to
understand.
Perhaps
why
eos
is
the
next
home
for
their
application,
and
this
is
really
what
we're
you
know.
O
The
idea
with
that
is
to
create
frameworks
around
what
we're
building
with
them,
so
that,
ultimately,
we
can
perhaps
have
a
plug-and-play
solution
whereby
we
can
recreate
what
we
do
with
them,
but
that
we
can
do
it
in
north
america,
south
america
and
africa
in
asia,
etc.
Right.
So
if
we
can
create
a
framework
around
that
everything
that
we
do
within
dnf
we're
looking
at,
how
can
we
scale
this
further
along?
But
we
don't
wait
until
the
solution
is
complete
before
we
try
to
do
it.
O
We
iterate
quickly,
we
iterate
frequently,
and
we
iterate
on
an
evergreen
basis
right,
so
we're
doing
that
with
with
zeiss
and
in
europe
and
the
idea
to
answer
your
question
now,
because
I've
positioned
kind
of
why
we
haven't
started
doing
that
until
now
is
to
signal
to
the
market.
So
there's
a
component
of
signaling
where
eos
is
back.
O
Eos
is
here,
the
new
eos
is
alive
and
when
people
start
looking
at
this,
they'll
see
that
there's
been
a
year
worth
of
work
that
they
unlikely
have
heard
of
that
they
have
not
been
knowledgeable
of
or
not
been
aware
of,
and
so,
when
they
look
at
eos
now,
instead
of
seeing
maybe
a
year
or
two
of
very
little
they'll
see
a
year
of
tremendous
progress
of
turning
the
ship
around
of
partnerships
starting
to
form
of
a
thriving
community.
That's
back
on
track
of
different
initiatives.
Funding
buckets
that
are
live
that
are
scaled.
O
That
actually
have
deployed
funds
that
are
not
theoretical,
they're
running
right,
and
so
from
that
symbolic
point
of
view,
that
is
something
that
we'll
be
able
to
showcase
and
that's
something
that
we
want
to
be
able
to
showcase.
So
that
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
we're
attending
in
person
is
really
to
signal
that
eos
is
back
yas,
never
left,
but
for
a
lot
of
people
it
wasn't
existed
in
the
first
place,
so
eos
is
here.
The
new
eos
is
here
the
other
things
that
we
want
to
focus
on
while
we're
there.
Of
course,
partnerships.
O
I
just
talked
about
how
eos
is
currently
in
a
state
whereby
it
started
to
make
partnerships
internally
with
all
of
the
different.
You
know,
providers
that
we've
been
working
with
in
the
last
year
within
eos,
providing
services
working
on
initiatives
and
stuff,
so
we
started
making
partnerships
at
that
level
started.
O
Making
partnerships
outside
of
eos
with
that
you
know
the
greater
antelope
ecosystem
and
with
these
with
these
events,
with
these
conferences,
a
lot
of
the
external
partnerships,
so
new
people
that
are
coming
from
the
outside,
because
that's
ultimately,
what
we
need
to
work
towards
is
getting
new
people
into
eos.
Getting
new
people
building
on
eos,
seeing
the
value
of
eos
our
goal
is
not
necessarily
to
get
the
band
back
together.
That's
some
unlimited
in
terms
of
scope
and
that's
really
thinking
very
small
term.
O
What
we're
looking
to
do-
and
you
see
that
in
the
events
that
we're
attending
is
a
mix
between
blockchain
events
and
traditional
web
2
events,
because
even
outside
of
our
own
ecosystem
and
just
inside
of
the
blockchain
ecosystem,
getting
people
to
come
in
getting
people
to
deploy
on
eos.
Getting
people
to
you
know
join
the
community
in
in
various
ways,
shapes
or
forms-
that's
great,
but
where
there's
a
tremendous
opportunity
is
also
the
position
eos
for
the
greater
web
2
space
right
now.
O
O
A
To
it's
patrick
novakito,
I
just
want
to
shout
out.
My
second
shout
out
is
for
hibleros
enf
eos
nation,
all
the
work
that
you
are
doing.
It's
amazing
and
I
recommend
all
the
people
to
watch
the
video
with
zeiss
and
global
with
rhett
outdirk
paul,
because
he's
a
partner
with
enf
and
he
will
be
on
the
heaven
boots.
A
He
has
the
answer
the
message
for
every
people
that
could
be
an
investor
that
could
be
someone
interested
about
the
tech
that
can
that
can
be
someone
that
has
still
in
mind
the
period
with
block
block
one.
So
I
encourage
the
people
to
see
the
video
with
zeiss
and
global
that
was
released
last
week,
august
23rd,
that
was
a
nice
interview,
a
good
great
man,
very,
reliable
and
also
a
leader
of
corpus.
A
So
that
was
a
nice
interview.
So
I
encourage
you
to
see
that
and
yeah
eos
never
dies.
Eos
eos
is
the
most
battle
tested.
Blockchain
is
this:
this
is
the
settlement
layer
that
it
should
be
and
with
yield,
plus
trustee
vm,
all
that
together
we
will
have
a
more
token
value,
lockhead,
something
very
reliable
and
with
anti-lope
engine
web
3
solutions.
So
the
future
is
great
for
eos,
eos,
never
dies,
yeah,
baby.
P
B
P
B
O
E
Yeah
I
want
to
address
like
somebody
asking
in
the
chat
about,
should
we
rebrand
eos,
you
know
there's
so
much
baggage,
I
don't
think
so,
as
we
just
like
I
mean
eos
is
not
block
one
anymore.
We've
been
working
on
this.
The
enf
has
been
working
for
this
on
this
for
last
year
and
I
think,
being
in
neos
and
having
this
narrative
and
having
this
unique
story,
really
positions
us
in
in
in
telling
people
what
web
3
and
what
decentralization
can
do
eventually
sure
it
might
take
some
more
time.
E
You
know
it's
not
as
coordinated
as
some
vc
powered
l
ones
or
other
projects
you
know,
but
in
the
end,
in
the
long
term,
I
think
that's
something.
That's
really
in
our
favor
that
we
can
tell
this
story
that
we
can
see
like
how
things
really
develop
and
that
we
can
also
create
this.
Like
heart,
tight-knit
community,
that's
taking
responsibility
and
staying
even
in
hard
times
right.
I
think
that's
really
valuable
and
I'm
really
proud
to
be
part
of
this,
and
everybody
on
this
call
should
be.
O
Let
me
address
this
as
well,
because
I
have
a
slightly
different
take
on
it.
Everything
that
you
just
said.
I
agree,
and
I
think
that
ultimately,
that's
likely
what's
going
to
happen,
but
let
me
give
the
caveat
so
when
we
started
off
the
rebranding
process
for
eos
io,
which
ultimately
led
to
antelope
one
of
the
things
that
we
knew
is
that
if
you
look.
D
O
We
have
been
through
the
enf,
essentially
gathering
data,
as
our
existing
our
existence
accrues.
We've
been
looking
at
how
the
market
reacts
to
everything
that
we've
been
doing
and
step
by
step.
We've
been
moving
closer
to
that
ultimate,
let's
say
100
of
changing
the
token
ticker.
However,
I
do
believe
that
we
don't
need
to
go
that
far.
I
don't
think
that
the
data
right
now
showcases
that
that's
the
case.
Having
said
that,
where
does
it
stop?
Does
it
stop
at
50?
Does
it
stop
at
60
at
70?
O
What
does
that
even
mean
if
100
is
maybe
changing
the
token
ticker?
Maybe
80
is
something
similar
to
polygon
and
matic,
which
we
talked
about
months
ago
right
now,
the
data
doesn't
seem
to
corroborate
that
we
would
even
need
to
go
that
far.
Having
said
that,
the
data
may
corroborate
that,
and
we
may
determine
that.
That
is,
you
know
up
until
where
we'd
like
to
go
right
now.
What
we've
seen
is
that
we
just
rebranded
to
antelope,
and
so
we
remove
that
legacy
of
the
acio.
O
Another
key
milestone
will
be
on
september
21st
when
we
hard
fork
away
or
when
we
consensus
upgrade
essentially
and
that
anybody
who's
not
running
elite
3.1
would
effectively
be
out
of
sync
with
the
network
that
symbolically,
has
also
a
lot
of
meaning,
because
now
there
is
no
other
alternative
than
to
run
leap,
which
is
the
community
led
version
of
antelope,
and
so
people
cannot
be
running,
let's
say:
eos,
io,
2.0.13
or
2.1
or
whatever.
That
may
be,
and
still
be
synced
with
the
mainland.
So
it's
very
symbolic,
while
also
being
very
formal.
O
If
I
liken
that
to
a
polygon,
slash,
matic
type
of
rebrand,
I
do
not
believe
we
need
at
this
stage,
based
on
what
we're
already
seeing
out
there.
Having
said
that,
we
don't
know
so
we
continue
accumulating
data,
maybe
those
that
believe
that
we
need
to
go
the
full
100.
Maybe
they
will
ultimately
be
right.
I
don't
know
our
direction
is
guided
by
data.
O
It's
guided
by
the
community
sentiment,
it's
guided
by
what
we're
seeing
when
we're
opening
doors
when
people
are
reaching
out,
it's
guided
by
metrics,
either
through
eden
through
pomelo,
through
the
grant
framework,
etc,
etc,
and
so
it's
not
necessarily
decided
it's
not
done
yet.
But
ultimately,
as
you
guys
are
here,
we
will
keep
you
informed
about
that
progress
right
now
likely
it
ends
with
the
the
hard
fork.
E
C
E
E
O
O
J
E
O
On
both
sides,
some
people
say
it's
necessary
and
other
people
say
like
yourselves
that
it's
not
and
you
both
people
are
likely
right
to
a
certain
extent.
What
is
our
job
as
the
nf
is
to
figure
out
where's
that
threshold,
where
that
little
extra
incremental
amount
of
effort
is,
is
just
not
worthwhile.
O
O
O
This
thing
just
won't
die
and
people
are
recognizing
that
the
the
resilience
and
the
grit
in
this
community,
alongside
the
actual
tremendous
skill
sets
that
is
contained
with
this
community,
is
what
overwhelmingly
you
know
is
giving
that
indication
of
an
undervalued
asset,
and
so
those
two
things
are
are
so
so
so
important
as
well
as
part
of
the
you
know
the
overall
vision,
mission
and
road
map
in
the
next
year.
That's
what
people
are
starting
to
see
and
they're
starting
to
see
it
in
you
know,
in
grand
numbers
too,.
O
A
This
is
not
the
time
to
ask
questions.
This
is
the
time
to
do
the
things
and
we
are
lions
power
lions.
We
are
not
ships.
We
are
just
doing
the
things
doing
the
better
collaboration
with
eden,
onios
eden,
fractal,
pomelo
and
eos
antilope
as
an
engine
webtree
solutions,
nice
boots
in
europe
with
zeiss
and
global
and
enf.
So
let's
go.
A
D
O
B
B
Tokens,
I
thought
we
were
wrapping
up
50
minutes
ago,
but
I'm
very
happy
that
we
went
almost
the
full
two
hours,
great
great
speeches
by
eve
there
dropping
some
alpha
and
thanks
to
yeah
thanks
to
everyone
who
jumped
on
the
show.
Today,
thanks
for
yana
on
the
production
tables
shout
out
to
everyone
watching
on
youtube
twitter,
facebook,
wherever
you
are
whatever
time
of
day,
it
is
hope
you
have
a
good
one
and
let's
go
eos.