►
Description
The Antelope Coalition updates the community on IBC governance, Leap 3.1 system contracts, Scalability+ bluepaper, re-prioritization of the top 21 items and more!
00:00:00 Start
00:00:05 Weekly meeting changes
00:03:03 IBC Governance
00:04:27 Antelope IBC sidechain model
00:05:45 Developer onboarding / Development workshops
00:10:39 FF / IBC champions definitions and status reports
00:21:25 Leap 3.1 system contracts implementations
00:23:05 Scailabilty+ Bluepaper
00:26:33 Wakket SDK approvers / champions definitions
00:34:20 RFP secure smart contract library
00:36:02 Documentation Antelope workgroup
00:37:40 Re-prioritization of top 21 items for the coalition
00:47:04 Create standards for Antelope
00:50:20 Antelope Github verification
00:51:16 End
The EOS Network Foundation coordinates financial and non-financial support to encourage the growth and development of the EOS Network. We’re harnessing the power of decentralization to chart a coordinated future for the EOS Network as a force for positive global change.
// EOS Network Foundation //
https://www.eosnetework.com
https://twitter.com/EosNFoundation
https://www.linkedin.com/company/eos-network-foundation
https://t.me/EOSNetworkFoundation
https://discord.gg/eos-network
info@eosnetwork.com
#EOS #EOSIO #ENF
A
All
right,
everybody,
so
first
of
all,
I'd
like
to
start
off
there's
going
to
be
some
changes
to
the
meeting,
Logistics
I
I
believe
it
was
discussed
or
several
people
know.
Kirsten
cannot
make
this
time
anymore,
just
for
some
of
the
reasons
so
I'm
gonna
take
over
sort
of
quarterbacking
the
the
meeting.
A
A
Perfect,
the
the
third
and
final
logistical
thing
is
the
mirror
board
we're
using.
This
is,
of
course,
we're
using
it
because
Kirsten
loved
loved
it
and
loved
working
in
it.
I
would
like
to
recommend
that
we
move
this
to
a
GitHub
board.
I
know
I'm
really
going
to
be
the
person
usually
in
it,
but
putting
it
in
GitHub
is
also
a
little
bit
more
standard.
Would
anybody
have
a
problem
if
I
do
that,
I'll
make
sure
to
capture
all
of
the
information
and
transfer
it
over
whenever
I
can
get
to
that?
C
A
A
A
E
B
E
D
E
One
we
sorry
this
is.
This
is
probably
a
separate
discussion
from
the
the
main
IBC
governance
one
and
that
one
I
think
is
I
mean
we
can
can
definitely
do
it
as
a
group
call
with
all
the
chains,
but
it's
also
probably
more
flexible
for
to
do
a
one-on-one
as
needed.
So
really
up
to
you
guys,
I,
don't
personally
have
a
preference
might
be
easier
to
coordinate,
separate
calls
with
every
chain
representatives
and
essentially
discuss
the
the
matter
with
them
individually.
E
We
did,
we
did
have
a
a
call,
a
while
back
I,
don't
think,
there's
been
there's
been
any
progress
on
that
front.
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
know
on
the
enf
side,
if
you
guys
have
discussed
it
internally,
some
more
but
we're
still
we're
still
I
think
there's
still
a
an
agreement
that
it
would
be
beneficial
to
have
a
some
sort
of
a
I
guess
like
a
an
onboarding
structure.
E
I
also
I
mean
I,
don't
want
to
I,
want
to
spoil
anything,
but
there's
also
other
teams
that
are
working
on
I.
Guess
like
I,
guess
like
a
core
developer
training
program
or
something
so
that
might
that
might
be
of
Interest
as
well,
but
as
it's
10
I,
don't
think.
We've
we've
reached
any
any
I
guess
like
formal
decision
on
the
matter,
I
know
I
know
the
enf
team
is
is
is
quite
busy
with
other
things.
G
C
Oh
okay,
meeting
with
gilm
and
I
also
have
been
working
with
oci
in
building
this
training
program
and
they're
just
take.
They
are
now
coming
back
with
a
proposal
which
I'm
waiting
for
them
to
give
me
as
the
next
steps,
and
they
have
not
scheduled
that
yet
we
did
I
had
since
I've
met
with
Guillaume
I
did
have
probably
an
hour-long
call
with
oci
going
into
specifics
and
from
there
you
know
they
decided
they
wanted
to
put
together
more
of
a
package.
C
You
know
we're
talking
about
who
pays
for
what,
and
you
know
just
all
the
logistics
behind
it
and
I
wanted
some
ways
of
validating
you
know
like
do
they
have
tests
or
certifications
I'd
like
it
a
little
more
formalized
than
the
ad
hoc
plan
they
were
coming
up
with.
I
was
asking
about
learning
management
systems
and
stuff.
They
probably
had
not
thought
about
I'm,
okay
with
it
being
ad
hoc.
If
it's
good,
but
you
know
obviously
I've
built
these
things
before
so
I.
My
expectations
were
probably
higher
than
theirs,
but
we
they're.
C
They
owe
a
plan
back
to
me
and
I'm
just
waiting,
because
we're
probably
going
to
proceed
and
I
offered
to
gilm
that
his
staff
can
be
included
in
that
process
as
well,
because
I'd,
like
our
staff,
we're
hiring.
We
have
some
Engineers
we've
made
offers
to
recently
that
are
just
C
plus
programmers
they're,
not
blockchain
programmers.
Yet
so
we
want
to
put
those
through
as
well
as
the
oci
staff
that
they
would
like
to.
You
know,
put
through
the
process
and
hire
as
well.
A
C
Okay,
if
you
ask
her
about
it,
it's
really
up
to
John
and
I.
Don't
know
who
John
was
working
with
Joe,
oh
I
do
his
name
is
like
CJ,
but
it
so
John
and
CJ.
The
practice
lead
are
working
on
Crafting
The
Proposal,
because
I
asked
a
lot
of
questions.
They're
like
oh
you're,
not
just
going
to
be
a
pushover,
so
they're
now
putting
something
in
writing.
Okay,.
C
D
C
A
E
E
This
being
said,
everything
is
going
very
well
on
development
side
of
things
we
did
deploy
I
think
yesterday
or
two
days
ago
on
the
IBC
solution,
the
full-fledged
IBC
solution,
which
is
Milestone
number
three
in
the
list
on
Jungle
four
and
kailan
networks.
So
this
is
working
as
we
speak.
We've
done
quite
a
bit
of
testing.
It
might
might
might
have
a
few
issues
here
and
there
like
we're,
not
we're
still
continuing
testing,
but
so
far
everything
looks
good.
We
do
have
I
shared
in
the
telegram.
E
Channel
I
shared
the
URL
of
the
reference
UI.
So
that's
a
very
minimalistic,
HTML
plus
JavaScript
only
reference
UI
to
serve
as
a
kind
of
I
guess
like
a
example
for
any
developer
that
wants
to
integrate
IPC
into
their
dapps
or
into
their
websites
or
platforms
or
whatever.
So
it's
essentially
they'll
be
it'll,
be
too
harsh
on
The
Styling
and
all
of
that,
but
it
works.
It
works
for
the
purpose
and
it's
it's
actually
really
simple,
so
I
think
it's
gonna.
It's
gonna
work
very
well
for
the
end
of
the
purpose.
E
Anyone
that
that
wants
to
give
it
a
spin
try
it
out
is
welcome
to
do
so.
So
just
just
have
a
look
at
the
Coalition
core
Channel
and
you
have
the
URL
there
and
we
also
published
it
I
think
in
a
few
more
public
telegram
groups,
so
I
will
definitely
be
gathering
some
feedback
there
and
I
want
to
also
read
the
rate,
we're
not
stuck
on
anything
just
yet
so
there's
no
there's,
no
immediate
rush
for
the
enf
to
complete
the
review.
A
E
Yes
correct:
we
did
also
get
the
the
the
proposal
from
Sentinel
to
audit
the
smart
contract,
so
I
mean
it's
like
I
say
as
an
external
audit.
It's
definitely
going
to
be
useful
and
and
we'll
we'll
pick
us
one
step
closer,
but
I
think
I
think
we.
We
can
all
agree
that
we
want
both
the
internal
audit
by
the
enf
and
the
external
audit
before
we
we
deploy
this
on
the
Chain's
main
Nets.
E
A
E
E
A
G
Oh
I
will
be
with
Sentinel
in
person.
November
9th
10th
approximately
I
coincides
with
token
2049
in
London,
as
for
like
a
report
launch
date
or
marketing,
or
anything
like
that,
it
could
be
cool
that
we
actually
do
something
while
we're
we're
together.
Maybe
just
it
seems
to
align
with
the
dates
that
you
have
there.
Yeah
I.
A
E
G
The
one
thing
you
see,
one
thing
that
I
would
like
to
change,
if
possible,
just
on
the
last
item,
I
think
it
was
Douglas
that
that
started
this
conversation
about
The
Branding
of
faster
finality
I
would
like
us,
and
it
would
start
here.
You
start
labeling
it
as
instant
finality.
If
we
change
this
for
if
and
we
start
discussing,
instant
finality,
I
think
it's
a
little
bit
more
appropriate
and
it's
much
better
representation
of
what
it
actually
is.
B
F
B
F
B
B
F
B
G
G
B
G
I
yeah
I
believe
we
talked
about
that
yesterday.
It's
all
fully
migrated.
It's
over
Jesse
had
brought
this
up
Jesse.
Can
you
confirm
I
believe
it
is
done,
and
but
can
you
confirm
it
from
your
point
of
view?
As
far
as
you
know,
it
is
done
as
well
from
what
you
intended
when
we
brought
that
item
up
a
few
weeks
back.
F
G
F
A
All
right,
scalability,
plus
blue
paper,
let's
see
last
week
we
talked
Zach
asked
a
couple.
Questions
in
the
channel.
I
was
looking
for
some
feedback
from
The
Proposal
Guillaume
to
share
links
to
summary
docs
for
instant
finality
IBC
with
Zach.
So,
first
of
all,
Guillaume
did
you
share
those
summary
docs
with
Zach.
E
G
I
I,
honestly,
don't
remember
so
I
think
the
way
that
Kirsten
was
doing
this
was
he
keeps
adding
to
the
list
so
everything
on
top,
basically
a
random
Improvement
schedule
for
next
week.
That's
the
latest
item.
He
added
on
this
list
yeah
so
that
one
with
sends
something
they've
been
like
four
months
ago:
yeah!
That's
that
I
think
that's
what
it
is.
D
G
G
So
translation
progress
so
we'll
need
to
end
the
scalability
plus
group
maybe
make
a
note
of
just
asking
Zach,
where
the
translation
is
because
I'm
guessing
that
that's
the
in
progress
and
then
it
says,
distribution
will
start
accept.
I.
Think
that
that's
the
last
update
and
I
think
he
was.
You
know
waiting
for
some
graphs
or
whatever,
but
if
you
confirm
with
Zach
who's,
not
here
should
be
able
to
get
that
offline
all
right
and
then
the
distribution.
G
G
A
G
Guidelines
yeah,
if
that's
the
route,
we
wanted
to
go
I
believe,
which
is
what
was
discussed
last
week
and
I.
Think
the
three
other
members
said.
Yes,
let's
do
that,
it's
easier!
Let's
it's!
You
know,
keep
it
simple!
Okay
and
we
were
me.
Oh
yes,
we
were
waiting,
I,
think
the
on
the
brand
guidelines
from
word,
which
I
believe
we've
received
now
I
believe
the
the
majority
of
everything
has
been
or
is
underway
or
is
almost
complete.
B
Yeah
that
that
is
what
we
I
believe,
that's
what
we
landed
on
and
yeah
everything's
been
been
delivered
at
this
point,
they're
asking
if
we
need
business
cards
and
things
like
that
and
we're
like
not
so
much
so
The
Branding
I
think
is,
is
has
been
very
successful
and
has
now
effectively
wound
down.
Thank
you
at
least
where
word
is
concerned.
D
G
G
We
would
actually
need
to
transfer
the
funds,
so
that
would
be
on
us
to
create
an
nsig
to
transfer
the
funds
or
anybody
who
wants
to
actually
do
the
MC.
That
would
be
nice
if
we're
not
the
ones
doing
it
transfer
the
funds
from
the
earmark
funds
for
the
total
amount
for
the
sdks
from
the
Kirk
treasury
to
the
newly
created
account
which
replicates
the
current
treasury,
but
with
the
owner
as
the
NF.
G
G
C
B
G
Would
be
to
transfer
over
the
full
amount,
which
I
think
adds
up
to
roughly
1.43
million
dollars
from
the
current
treasury,
which
is
elplus.wg
to
the
newly
created
account
specific
for
this
contract,
which
Aaron
is
the
one
that
you
created
I.
Just
don't
have
it
on
the
top
of
my
head,
like
SDK
wallet
proposal.
G
A
G
A
G
B
Quick
quick
question
on
this
I.
As
I
recall,
we
were
going
to
have
individuals.
Individual
Milestones
were
going
to
have
potentially
different
Val
verifiers
validator
Champions,
whatever
we're
going
to
call
it
because
because
they
may
correspond
with
different
people's,
you
know,
domain
expertise
is,
do
the
do
the
Champions.
Are
they
the
ones
who
sort
of
guide
the
overall
process
and
and
are
sometimes
validators
and
they're,
sometimes
just
working
with
others
or
how?
What's
the
I
don't
quite
fully
understand
the
connection?
B
A
So
one
thing
Baron,
and
so
in
this
example,
Aaron-
has
met
with
Adam
and
actually
also
for
instant
finality
guillaume's
met
with
Adam
to
create
the
status
report
that
we
talked
about
months
ago
that
everybody
liked
that
template
on
that
status
report.
You
will
see
the
summaries
of
the
Milestones
with
the
projected
date,
so
everybody
will
see
well
in
advance.
B
B
Yeah,
okay,
that
makes
sense
to
me
so
the
the
Champions
are
what
are
not
necessarily
validators.
They
may
be
in
some
cases,
but
they
are.
They
are
effectively
doing
some
project
oversight,
project
management
on
our
side,
client-side,
project
management,
just
to
make
sure
that
we're
you
know
hitting
all
our
our
milestones
and
and
doing
our
part
of
each
of
each
one.
That.
B
F
G
And
the
idea
just
to
make
it
clear
to
everybody,
so
the
Champions
and
the
validators
would
would
recommend
that,
yes,
a
milestone
is
done.
Ultimately,
the
four
chain
leads
that
have
signing
authority
over
the
account
still
need
to
make
that
decision
and
essentially
sign
right.
So
it
doesn't
remove
accountability
from
those
ultimately
who
have
to
make
the
signature
on
train
it's
just.
It
gives
them
extra
information
from
people
to
look
towards
as
to
whether
or
not
they
should
be
signing
But.
G
G
A
The
proposals
are
due
tomorrow,
so
I,
don't
think,
there's
necessarily
anything
to
say,
although
why
not
has
officially
opted
out
just
you
know,
we'll
we'll
see
that
and
the
word
that
I'm
understanding
is
that
the
three
remaining
ones,
I
believe
are
in
fact
going
to
submit
a
unified
proposal
again.
We
we
don't
have
to
get
into
this
again.
This
week
we
talked
about
it
last
week.
A
E
B
E
A
G
G
D
G
I
think
it
didn't
happen
on
Labor
Day
and
last
week,
when
we
did
the
update
Kirsten
recognized
that
it
basically
that
was
going
to
happen
on
labor
degrees.
So
that's
why
it
didn't
happen
and
that's
when
that
line
of
Kirsten
will
verify
he'll
take
the
lead
going
forward
was
written
I,
not
sure
if
he
did
I,
don't
I
I'm
looking
at
the
channel
right
now
and
I,
don't
think
he
did
so.
Basically
that
item
is
stale
until
somebody
picks
it
up.
A
A
A
A
So
we
were
talking
about
this
because
we
wanted
to
kind
of
outline
a
process
a
little
bit
more
straightforward.
We
talked
at
high
level.
The
first
thing
we
wrote
down
is
we
want
to
remember
as
we're
discussing
the
rest
of
the
steps,
ultimately
we're
going
to
do
this
every
quarter
and
we're
trying
to
get
to
three
or
four
items
to
rfps,
which
means
we
don't
want
to
process.
That
starts
with
a
list
of
like
50,
because
that
just
creates
a
lot
of
complexity.
A
The
other
thing
that
we
were
discussing
is,
we
think
the
process
I'll
kind
of
go
through
it
will
require
the
change
to
do
a
little
bit
more
prep
work
with
their
own
communities
with
their
own
priorities
before
they
bring
it
in
and
so
our
so.
What
we
want
to
do
is
so
we'll
create
a
list
of
the
existing
items
and
that's
it's
like
a
hundred
plus
items,
if
you
guys
recall
I,
mean
I,
think
the
core
had
like
50
60
just
by
itself
and
we'll
send
that
out.
A
Just
so,
everybody
can
refresh
your
memory
on,
like
all
the
ideas
that
are
in
the
blue
papers.
All
the
ideas
that
have
previously
been
collected
for
ad
hoc
section
and
then
we'll
also
as
part
of
that
list,
remind
you
what
the
last
prioritization
like
here
with
the
20.
We
all
voted
last
time,
just
just
so,
to
refresh
your
memory,
but
then
what
we
are
recommending
is
each
Coalition
chain
selects
five
items
to
propose.
These
can
be
five
items
from
that
list.
A
I
know
we
talked
last
time
about.
Do
we
want
seven?
Do
we
want
nine
or
eight,
but
we
just
started
kind
of
doing
the
math
on
this?
We're
like
we're
trying
to
get
down
to
three
and
four,
so
we
want
to
put
the
hard
work
of
first
round
priorities
back
on
the
chains
and
then
you
show
up
and
say
Here's
R5,
and
we
consolidate
that
into
a
list
of
at
most
20
but
it'll
be
likely
there'll
be
some
duplicates,
so
maybe
it'll
be
between
15
and
20.
A
and
then
from
that
list,
instead
of
just
rank
ordering
them.
One
of
the
things
we
also
learned
last
time
was
rank
order
doesn't
necessarily
reflect
the
real
prioritization
weight.
So
you
might
think
your
first
priority
is
more
important
than
the
other
four
you're
adding
combined,
and
so
what
we
were
suggesting
is
what,
if
we
give
each
chain,
we
made
up
20
prioritization
points,
but
and
you
can
distribute
those
as
you
want
to
all
of
them.
A
A
So
that's
then,
you
know
I
think
since
enf
ran
this
in
our
spreadsheet
last
time,
I
think
it's
easy
enough,
for
you
know
Eve
and
Ted
I
know
I'm
kind
of
speaking
at
a
turn,
but
I
can
manage
that
pretty
easily
set
up
the
spreadsheet
and
then
I'll
just
present
that
back.
If
you
guys
like
this
process,.
B
For
me,
that's
I
was
laughing
because
I
was
gonna,
propose
pretty
much
exactly
the
same
thing
down
to
down
to
20
points.
It's
like
it's
so
so
I
yeah,
it's
uncanny.
So,
yes,
I
I,
think
it's
a
great
I
think
it's
a
great
way.
I
mean
we.
We
will
it's
a
it's
an
experiment
right.
We
are
not
right.
Now
we're
not
right
now
saying:
okay,
whatever
gets
the
most
points
is
what's
gonna
win?
That's
gonna!
B
A
A
G
B
B
D
B
A
G
A
G
D
A
G
B
D
A
A
G
B
If
someone
from
cellos
who's
going
to
be
involved,
I
would
say
Jesse
would
be
the
ideal
person
and
and
again
the
point.
We
have
to
do
this
because
at
the
point
we
were
we
discussed
last
week
was
there
are
no?
There
are
no.
We
do.
We
have
no
standards
where
we
what
we
do
are
going
to
create
you
know
de
facto
standards,
but
we
need
to
make
sure
that
there's
some
intentionality
behind
that.
A
So
I
would
think
the
first
thing
we
want
to
do
is
find
a
owner
for
this,
or,
if
we
don't,
if
nobody
has
the
ability
to
be
an
owner,
that
almost
answers
the
question
in
terms
of
is
it
while
it's
important,
we
obviously
have
other
things
going
on
pushing
this
down.
So
does
somebody
want
to
be
an
owner
on
this.
F
I
could
try
to
help
as
an
owner
I
don't
know.
If
maybe
we
could
delay
it
by
a
bit.
I've
got
I'm
going
out
of
town
and
have
a
handful
of
things
that
are
gonna
have
to
take
priority
over.
You
know
leading
something
like
that,
but
we
could
also
a
couple
weeks
and
start.
You
know
Target
early
in
mid-october
to
start
the
process
could.
B
In
yeah,
I
think
I
think
if
we,
if
we
have
something
where
we
have
people
who
are
interested,
but
no
one
is
willing
or
able
or
whatever
to
take
ownership
at
that
time.
I
think
the
next
step
would
be
for
us
to
all
of
us
to
go
back
to
our
organizations
and
say
hey.
Maybe
you
know
maybe
there's
somebody
here
who
would
be
good
for
this
role
but
who
hasn't
been
involved
in
these
conversations?