►
From YouTube: EOSIO+ Meeting, January 27th, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Are
on
wax
that
are
on
this
call
wax
itself.
Lucas
is
not
here
and,
of
course,
or
joseph
or
joseph
yeah
yeah
yeah
joseph
joined
last
week.
That's
right
do
we
know?
If
actually
that's
that's
one
of
the
things
do
we
know
if
they're
on
the
invite
joseph
was,
and
he
did
a
maybe
oh,
we
don't.
We
also
don't
have
or
but
buddy
declined.
A
Stan
did
accept,
jesse
did
accept
and
there's
lucas,
so
there's
wax
and
joining
in.
B
One
quick
comment
about
the
miro
board
is:
we
do
have
everybody's
emails
on
the
side
there.
I
wasn't
sure
if
we
wanted
that
visible
during
the
call
or
if
we
care
I
mean
my
email's
out
in
public,
but
I
know
we
cleaned
up
the
discord
channel
when
we
made
it
public.
C
Gone
now
so
yeah,
that's
a
very
good
comment.
I
don't
want
everybody
to
be
spammed.
I've
just
been
recently
added
to
the
challenge
team
side
and
it
ended
up
with
having
my
first
offers
for
crypto
users
address
lists
for
mailings
so
beginning
now,
so
we
don't
want
to
get
those.
C
Okay,
so
let's
go:
let's
go
to
the
agenda,
so
I
next
to
the
points
that
we
wanted
to
discuss
that
we
took
over
from
last
week's
call.
So
for
this
time
I
did
receive
comments
about
the
the
decision.
D
C
Brave
engine
agency
and
the
corresponding
budget
to
that
justin's,
probably
gonna
elaborate
a
little.
Then
I
would
like
to
talk
about
update
on
jira
and
conference
setup,
and
then
there
was
a
very
intense
and
good
discussion
yesterday
in
the
telegram
chat
about
the
administration,
resources
and
probably
kind
of
the
management
of
the
group
going
forward.
I
think
that
there
were
some
people
that
that
even
kind
of
made
a
proposal
that
my
they
might
they
might
be
in
a
position
to
do
this
for
the
group.
C
C
Okay,
so
it
seems
we
don't
have
it
good,
then
I
would
propose
that
that
we
take
on
these
topics
here
at
least
one
and
two
three,
I
think,
is
something
that
we
can
discuss
at
the
end
of
the
call.
If
we
got
time
it
is
obviously
very
important,
but
I
would
kind
of
try
to
move
this
back
until
we
discuss
the
other
things,
then
I
would
actually
love
to
hand
over
to
justin
to
give
an
update
of
the
brand
agency
and
what
has
been
done
there
so
far.
E
Yeah,
of
course,
I've
actually
just
received
or
exactly
a
day
or
two
ago,
the
first
proposal
from
rn01
it's
going
to
come
out
if
we
go
with
them
around
160k
163
is
actually
yeah,
but
this
is
including,
like
a
full
branding,
including
the
naming,
including
you
know,
all
the
visuals
and
other
elements,
and
also
some
of
the
website
design.
E
So
this
is
over
a
three
month
period,
I
think,
with
the
first
month
you
know
really
focusing
on
you
know
the
key
things
that
we
need,
which
is
the
the
name
obviously
to
be
established,
and
some
of
the
visual
elements
and
some
of
the
basic
messaging
elements
as
well
so
yeah.
I
think
all
of
these
are
going
to
fall
within
like
that
100
to
200k
zone,
and
you
know,
obviously
we
could
reduce
it
down.
E
So
probably
one
of
our
decision
points
is
whether
we
want
to
spend
this.
The
the
was
it
200
or
250k-
that's
been
allocated
by
the
enf
kindly
for
this
process.
E
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
wait
until
I
get
all
three
proposals
back
and
you
know
get
some
help
deciding
on
which
one
and
and
then
decide
at
that
point
you
know:
do
we
want
to
spend
that
money.
F
F
E
Agency,
I
reviewed
is
also
up
to
speed
with
your
cio,
so
they
could
be
quite
good.
This
was
the
one
that
stan
introduced
me
to
through
his
colleague
adam.
E
I
don't
know
if
he
has
an
agency
name
that
he's
working
through
for
this,
but
he's
quite
up
to
speed,
and
he
did
the
blue
paper
for
one
of
your
working
groups.
I
think
it's,
the
eos
core
group,
correct,
yes,
yep.
G
So
I
I
would
say
they
have
a
nice
looking
pdf
in
my
experience
and
I
have
worked
with
projects
like
this.
G
This
is
the
this
is
the
the
price
tag
if
you
want
to
have
like
microsoft,
like
you
know,
a
huge
huge
brand,
you
know
work
done,
which
I
think
it
might
be
a
little
too
much
for
us,
but
at
the
same
time
I
think
we
desperately
need
a
very
talented
team
doing
their
refresh
of
the
brand
or
the
the
the
creation
of
the
brand,
and
I
look
at
this
as
something
that
probably
you
know
it
didn't
get
factored
in
into
expenses.
G
You
know,
because
we
didn't
really
think
you
know,
because
in
in
the
initial
generation
of
this
group
and
and
proposals
and
whatnot,
you
know
we
it
just
wasn't
there.
There
are
too
many
things
we
didn't
know
until
we
sort
of
like
dug
in,
and
this
is
probably
one
of
them.
So
so
I
think
what
we
should
do
is
look
at
our
whole.
G
You
know
the
budge,
the
things
that
are
going
to
be
our
costs
and
and
the
budget
pieces,
and
I
think
whoever
we
get
good
is
going
to
be
somebody
who
is
you
know
somewhere
around
this
price
price
level,
or
you
know
no,
no
less
than
half
this
price
level,
and-
and
I
guess
the
only
the
only
thing
to
look
at
is
if
we
can
do
things
in
a
modular
way
where
we
find
we
find
somebody
to
you
know
to
come
up
with
the
good
basic
pieces
that
we
need
and
then
we
could
engage
them
again
to
to
work
out
all
the
other.
G
C
So
is
there
anybody
that
that
objects
in
going
forward
with
that?
With
that
rent
agency.
E
Well,
we're
still
waiting
for
the
last
two
proposals
to
be
received,
but
so
yeah
for
today
we're
more
like
you
know,
just
establishing
what
our
budget
is
likely
going
to
be,
probably
in
the
next
few
days.
I'll
have
both
the
other
two
proposals
and
we
will
sort
of
have
to
make
a
decision
pretty
quickly
and
move
forward
pretty
quickly,
because
you
know
we
only
really
have
one
month
all
of
february
to
do
this.
E
G
Do
has
any
so
has
any.
Is
anyone
responsible
for
the
budget
within
this
group?
Is
anybody?
Is
there,
like
a
you,
know,
a
subcommittee
or
just
somebody
who's
taken
on
the
idea
of
saying,
okay,
we
know
what
our
resources
are,
what
are
our
expected
expenditures
and
how
do
we
so
that
we
can
like
look
at
those
and
prioritize
those?
If
not,
I
think
we
need.
G
We
need
somebody
to
to
shoulder
that,
because
it's
going
to
be
very
hard
to
make
decisions,
especially
quick
decisions,
if
every
time
we
have
to
figure
out,
you
know
individually
how
something
fits
in
without
it
over
without
you
know,
looking
over
it-
and
you
know
from
a
10
000
foot
view.
C
That's
the
most
likely
question
for
zach
and
eaves.
If
we
can,
one
is
do
we
do
we
have
this
budget
immediately
available?
If
we
make
the
decision,
then
two
is
obviously
the
process
of
then
deciding
on
that.
The
the
only
question
I
I
wanted
to
put
into
the
room
is:
if
because,
obviously
having
an
agency
that
did
work
for
eos
they
they
are
not
unbiased.
C
If
that's
that's
the
correct
word
so
so
they
have
kind
of
the
history
and
sometimes
if
you
want
to
have
like
a
totally
new
name,
it's
good
to
have
to
talk
to
somebody
that
has
no
history,
so
I
just
wanted
to
throw
that
in.
If,
if
we
say
it's,
it's
okay,
if
that
would
be
one
of
the
agencies,
that's
good
to
coming
back.
Also
to
the
question
of
justin
is
who,
who
will
be
deciding
which
of
those
three
offers
we
we're
gonna,
take
it's
probably
not.
C
We
we
take
the
cheapest,
it's
more
like
it's
who
who's
gonna,
do
the
best
job
for
us.
So
so
the
question
is:
who
really
wants
to
make
that
decision
then
is?
Is
it
the
chains
with
one
vote
each
as
as
we
discussed
as
general?
C
A
At
least
two
of
them
that
I
recall
the
first
one
was:
were
the
funds
that
the
enf
is
making
available
accessible
right
away.
Yes,
they
are
as
soon
as
we-
and
I
don't
know
if
this
is
on
my
end
at
this
point
or
if
it's,
if
it's,
I
guess,
justin
and
I
would
need
to
to
touch
base
so
that
we
do
an
agreement
between
the
telos
foundation
and
the
eos
network
foundation
to
transfer
those
funds,
but
essentially
that
it's
a
administrative
process
at
this
point
can
happen
at
any
time.
A
There's
nothing
stopping
or
it
doesn't
literally
could
be
done
in
the
next
15
minutes.
If
we
got
off
the
call,
but
just
did
it.
The
second
part
of
the
question
was
whether
or
not
the
enf
is
going
to
be
overseeing
the
process
of
the
allocation
of
funds,
and-
or
I
guess
I
don't
know
how
better
to
say
this,
but
you
know
putting
its
foot
down
or
putting
any
kind
of
contingencies
on
no,
not
at
all.
These
funds
are
made
available
to
the
group.
A
The
group
needs
to
determine
as
a
group
how
they
want
to
allocate
those
funds
where,
where
they
want
to
allocate
those
funds,
eos
would
be
a
participant
in
those
discussions,
but
by
no
means
is
eos
the
one
that
will
decide.
That
is
not
what
I'm
trying
to
create
here,
and
so
that
would
be
for
the
group
to
come
up
with
a
means,
and
I
guess
right
now,
tentatively.
A
What
we
have
is
what
we
agreed
on
last
week
was
one
vote
one
chain,
and
so
we
would
go
through
that
process.
A
I'm
also
trying
to
as
much
as
possible
keep
myself
out
of
the
discussions
to
a
certain
extent,
because
I
do
not
want
it
to
have
the
appearance
very
much
so
that
eos
is
going
to
direct
and
decide
what
this
group
does.
That
is
not
the
intent
and
so
on
purpose
by
design,
I'm
letting
everybody
else.
You
know
basically
bait
those
proposals
so
that
we
we
will
vote.
We
will,
or
I
will
vote
I
will
participate,
but
I
definitely
do
not
want
to
impose
yeah.
That's
great.
A
So
thank
you
for
for
clarification
so
and
then
the
other
part.
Sorry,
just
the
other
part
that
was
the
about
the
this
particular
branding
agency.
So
again,
because
this
particular
branding
agency
came
from
us,
I
would
rather
let
you
know
others
speak
up.
We
obviously
have
a
biases
towards
that
that
firm,
we're
working
with
them
right
now,
and
so
I
would
be
more
interested
in
finding
out
what
other
people
think.
A
I
suggested
two
firms,
one
that
I
guess
we
got
the
the
proposal
from,
but
then
there's
another
one
that
I
I
don't
know
if
justin
that's
one
of
the
ones
that
you're
still
waiting
on
is
called
pentagram.
I've
not
worked
with
pentagram,
so
should
they
make
a
proposal?
I
would
gladly
you
know,
offer
more
of
my
opinions
on
that.
But
you
know
our
experience.
Working
with
rn01
for
for
the
rest
of
the
people
on
a
call
has
been
extremely
good.
A
They
are
very
professional
they
by
now
know
we
started
working
with
them
october,
so
they're
about
I
get
four
months
in
in
terms
of
their
their
rabbit
hole
down
the
rabbit
hole
in
eos
eosio,
so
they're
very
well,
knowledgeable,
they're,
extremely
professional
everything
that
they've
done
for
us
has
been
of
the
highest
quality.
You
know
the
ultimate
product
that
you
get
is
like
douglas
said.
You
know,
months
of
work,
coming
up
to
the
vision,
the
strategic
positioning
of
the
brand,
the
the
feeling
and
the
ideas
behind
it.
That
whole
process
was
very
pleasant.
A
They
were
on
the
ball.
They
clearly
know
what
they're
doing,
and
so
you
know
that's
why
we
recommended
them
or
we
brought
them
forth,
but
I'm
I'm
still,
however,
on
having
said
that,
I'm
still
looking
to
see
what
other
agencies
would
you
know
produce
and
or
propose
before
I
would
make
a
decision
on
my
own
okay.
Can
I
ask
you
a
quick
question:
yeah.
G
Okay,
that's
always
a
question.
Yeah,
I'm
gonna
ask
another
one.
Now
what
can
you
explain
to
me
the
so
it
sounds
like
they
have
done
work
for
eos,
but
they
haven't
the
chain,
but
not
they
didn't
work.
They
didn't
work
on
the
any
of
the
original
brand.
No,
no!
No!
No.
G
Just
feel
like,
so
I
don't
care
about
that.
That's
like!
If
that's
that's
a
benefit.
I
wanted
to
make
sure
they
hadn't
done
the
the
eos
branding,
because
I've
shared
my
feelings
about
about
that
and
I
wouldn't
want
to.
I
wouldn't
want
to
bring
in
anyone
who
would
have
worked
on
that
that
thing,
but
I
got
you
know
I
don't
care
if
we're
using
the
same.
G
The
same
group
there's
yeah,
especially
if
you
guys
have
had
the
the
benefit
of
a
good
working
relationship
with
them
and
have
already
sort
of
trained
them
up
on
a
lot
of
the
concepts
and
names
and
goals,
and
things
like
that.
So
thanks
for
clarifying.
A
That
so
the
background
information
that
they
have,
I
think
that
is
quite
beneficial
to
this
group-
is
that
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
early
on
because
of
where
the
enf
was
and
the
impending
you
know,
actions
you
know
firing
block
one.
Essentially,
we
really
had
to
give
them
all
of
the
background,
all
of
the
history
of
how
we
got
here
today
and
so
that
they
have
they.
A
They
know
where
we
come
from
and
the
idea
was
they
need
to
know
where
we
come
from
in
order
to
position
where
the
enf
would
be
going
and
how
we
want
to
position
where
the
enf
is
going.
So
all
of
that
knowledge
is
essentially
what
what
we
spent
internally
at
the
enf
time
with
them
to
get
them
up
to
speed
on.
A
Did
they
produce
stuff
for
you,
or
is
that
kind
of
ongoing
right
now?
Oh
for
sure,
so
I
mean
you.
Our
branding
guide
is
out
in
public
our
logo.
You
know,
basically,
all
of
the
assets
that
you
see
they're
currently
as
well
doing
our
website,
so
we
hired
them
as
well
for
the
web
design
side
of
things,
the
blue
papers
that
are
coming
out,
the
branding
for
the
blue
papers
that
is
being
fed
by
them.
A
So
the
content
is
all
being
done
by
the
the
teams,
the
respective
teams,
but
so
that
there's
one
cohesive
brand
around
the
blue
papers
and
the
red
that
also
follows
along
the
branding
guidelines
of
the
enf,
that's
being
done
by
them.
So
you
can
go
out
and
actually
see
the
you
know
their
workload
and
maybe
zach.
We
could
share
the
branding
guidelines
or
actually
I
can
do
that.
A
I
can
share
the
branding
guidelines,
so
you
can
see
it
actual
concrete
work
in
in
the
telegram
group
that
we
have
so
you
can
see
a
result
but
leading
up
to
that-
and
I
guess
others
of
you
who
know
who've
worked
with
branding
agencies,
the
branding
guideline
or
style
guideline
that
we
got,
which
I
think
is
actually
shared.
A
That's,
I
think,
the
third
or
fourth
product
that
we
got
from
them
so
prior
to
that
the
vision,
the
basically
everything
that
led
up
to
the
brand
guidelines
that
I
guess
has
not
been
made
public
because
that's
really
internal
to
us,
but
otherwise
we
I
have
no
issues
sharing
that
either
it's
basically
this.
You
know
step
one
step,
two
step.
Three
type
of
thing.
C
Yeah,
okay,
so
it
might
have
an
additional
synergy,
because
if
they're
doing
this
just
right
now,
there
might
be
some
some
synergies
in
in
developing
the
the
corporate
designs
and
logos
and
everything,
because
they've
done
a
lot
of
work
on
that.
So
so
probably
their
price
tag
can
be,
can
be
a
bit
lower.
But
then
then
it
seems
that
if
nobody
speaks
up
now,
it's
okay
to
leave
them
in
there.
It
might
have
benefits.
C
So
if
you
will
share
the
current
draft,
so
everybody
has
a
feeling
of
of
how
this
is
looking
like
and
justin.
Can
you
please
share
the
the
offers
as
soon
as
you
get
them
yeah,
maybe
even
with
some
work
work
samples
that
they
might
be
providing
in
telegram
on
trade
on
telegram,
so
everybody's
had
a
chance
to
to
read
through
that
and
the
moment
we
have
all
three.
The
next
meeting
we
have.
C
We
we're
gonna
make
a
decision
on
which
agency
should
be
should
be
tasked
to
to
work
on
this
and
then
all
the
budgeting
stuff.
It
seems
to
be
clear,
and
then
we
can
continue
with
this
and
and
have
a
clear
vote
on
on
which
provider
should
be
doing
the
job
based
on
the
on
the
proposals.
So
that's
great.
E
C
Yeah,
that's
fine!
Okay!
Then
then,
let's,
let's
discuss
that
once
you
have
all
the
three
offers
we,
everybody
should
have
like
at
least
a
day
to
to
look
through
those
with
all
the
schedules
that
we
all
have
and
then
then
we
do
like
a
telegram
world
for
with
the
with
the
trains
to
to
decide
on
that.
That's
fine.
G
G
And
that
you
know
we
not
and
that
the
rest
of
the
group,
not
necessarily
try
to
you,
know
redo
the
work
you've
already
done.
G
We
should
largely
have
that
person
present
to
us
who
they
think
we
should
do
and
then
and
then,
barring
anything
you
know
unexpected.
It
should
probably
just
be
a
unanimous
hand
vote
on
something
like
this
right,
because
otherwise
the
alternative
is-
and
we
all
dig
in
and
stuff,
and
we
should
look
at
it,
and
people
should
raise
red
flags
but
barring
those,
let's
not
turn
it
into
a
big
debate.
G
Yeah.
I
agree
excellent.
The
other
thing
I
think
coming
back
to
the
budget
really
this
is
this,
is
you
know
if
we
have
a
250
thousand
dollar
budget
and
we're
talking
about
a
200
000
project
that
we
really
gotta
at
least
have
some
idea
about
what
what's
going
to
have
to
squeeze
into
the
rest
of
that
other
50
000
soon.
F
F
G
Into
that
as
well,
I
think
that's
a
very
good
question,
but
I
think
there's
a
different
question
that
is
higher
priority
and
you
know
I
I
apologize
that
this
has
been
discussed
before,
because
yet
last
week
was
my
first
week,
but
I'm
sensing
that
it
hasn't
like
there
is
the
big.
What
is
the
responsibility?
What
what
are
our
deliverables?
G
What
are
we-
and
I
know
that
there's
some
nebulousness
around
that
like
we
have
to
we
have
to
you
know
we
have
to
figure
out
what
we're
doing,
but
I
think
that
there
are
some
core
pieces.
You
know
we
dove
right
in
with
branding
which
makes
sense,
because
it's
a
it
takes
a
long
time
and
we
know
branding
is
important.
G
I
came
into
this
thinking
that
and
and
at
the
risk
of
you
know,
leaving
a
bunch
of
stuff
off,
but
just
starting
starting
a
list.
So
the
big
thing
is,
we
need
a
list.
We
need
a
list
of
we
need.
I
don't
want
to
spend
any
time
doing
like
a
mission
statement
or
anything
like
that,
but
what
we
need
we
need
to.
You
know
we
need
an
actual.
G
You
know
what
are
we
here
to
do?
I
think
what
we're
here
to
do
is
create
and
launch
an
entity
that
is
able
to
that
is
able
to
manage.
You
know
manage
the
development
of
eocio
code
going
forward
with
a
understanding
about
what
are
its
rules
of
operation
and
how
each
chain
or
other
participant
is
going
to
join
work
leave
if
they
do
anything
like
that,
like
the
life
cycle
of
of
organization
participation
in
the
organization,
so
so
I
think
we
need
to.
Certainly
we
need
to
have.
G
We
need
to
figure
out
what
the
entity
is
where
it's
going
to
be
domiciled,
what
structure
it's
going
to
take
who's
going
to
be
initially
in
charge
right,
so
I
don't
so
those
are.
I
think
we
have
to
figure
that
out
and
get
that
and
and
create
this
shell
or
an
organization
that
then
I
I
I
don't
think
that
a
250
000
grant
is
is
a
reasonable
expectation
for
ongoing
operations.
So
my
feeling
was
always
in
my
understanding
was
that
this
is
the
group,
that's
going
to
say:
hey.
G
How
are
we
going
to
work
together?
How
are
we
going
to
work
together
in
what
way
are
we
going
to
work
together
and
how
are
we
going
to
put
a
public
face
and
organization
forward
to
the
rest
of
the
community
and
then
once
that
happens,
that
organization
is
going
to
come
back
and
seek
various
sources
of
funding
for
the
ongoing
development?
G
That's
my
that's
my
understanding,
and
so
my
my
think.
My
thinking
is
that
deliverables
are
yes
branding,
but
also
just
this
decision
about.
Where
are
we
gonna?
Where,
where
is
this
thing?
Is
it
gonna
be
a
corporation?
Is
gonna
be
a
dao?
Is
gonna,
be
whatever,
and
you
know
based
on
those
decisions?
Where
will
it
be?
Where
will
it
exist
in
the
world
and
what
are
the
pros
and
cons
of
of
you
know
things
like
that?
G
Is
it
you
know,
there's
there
could
be
a
lot
of
things
that
could,
if
we're
going
to
be
trying,
I
had
always
hoped
to
be
going
and
trying
to
find
hire
as
many
of
the
previous
previous
block,
one
eosio
core
dev
devs
as
we
could,
and
so,
if
that
is,
you
know
as
employees.
If
that
is
what
we
do,
then
that
would
drive
us
towards
towards
being
a
us
based
company.
There's,
if
that's,
if
there's
some
other
things,
you
know
we're
just
gonna
have
to
weigh
these.
G
So
we
need
to
know
what
we're
doing
what
what
the
pieces
we
have
to
set
up
for
are
and
and
then
get
that
ready
to
go,
and
then
at
that
point
that
organization
figures
out
the
funding
and
the
the
ongoing
administration
operations
is,
that
is
that
close
to
other
people's
understanding,
or
did
I
leave
anything
important
out
or
add
anything?
That's
really
not!
That's!
Really
not
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish.
F
That
lines
up
with
my
understanding.
H
Yep
actually
douglas,
it
was
kind
of
a
question
for
me
like
trying
to
create,
as
you
guys
have
said,
like
how
to
have
a
budget
discussion
without
knowing
the
context
of
the
overall.
You
know,
initiatives
that
are
going
to
be
set.
We're
going
to
be
saddled
with.
I
like
how
you,
if
that
is
it,
create
and
launch
an
entity,
because
my
main
concerns
were
the
ongoing.
F
G
And-
and
I
also
think
since
I
would
like
to
hear
dnf's
ideas
about
this
as
we
as
we
go,
you
know
go
down
the
line
because,
as
we
develop
this
because
you
know
grant
you
know
it's
quite
obvious
that
that's
going
to
be
the
first
short
first
source
of
funding
that
we
are
probably
that
that
new
entity
is
going
to
go
for
you
know,
telos
and
all
the
other
chains
will
contribute
as
well,
but
I
think
that
the
I
think
you
know,
we
all
know
that
you
know
that
we
need
something
that
that
the
enf
is
going
to
find
an
organization
worth.
G
You
know
contributing
funds
for
you
know.
So
if
that's
not,
you
know
so
I'd
say:
if
that's
not,
you
know
if
your
thinking
was
no
no,
no.
This
is
supposed
to
set
up
an
ongoing
thing,
or
something
like
that.
If
you,
if
you
felt
that
I've
missed
something
some
big
part,
you
know-
or
you
know
or
whatever
I
think
it'd
be
good
to.
If
you
guys
could,
let
us
know
it's
like
yeah
that
we
are,
we
are
looking
to.
G
You
know
that
that
lines
up
with
what
we're
looking
in
terms
of
funding
priorities
following
this
or
not.
A
G
It's
a
question
that
we
will
have
to
ask
the
enf
and
eve
and
and
others,
but
we
don't
need
a
response
right
now,
but
I'm
saying
be
prepared
for
the
question,
because
if
we
come
up
with
a
you
know,
once
we
what
as
we
come
or
even
in
the
process
of
coming
up
with
the
list,
we're
you
know
if
we
get
if
we
get
really
far
a
feel,
I
know
you
got
you're
bending
over
backwards,
not
to
drive
this,
but
I
don't
want
us
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
building.
G
You
know
a
plan
that
ultimately,
that
doesn't
line
up
with
what,
with
what
your
vision
is,
is
the
funding
organization
right?
That's
the
that's!
That's
the
first
task
of
of
this
organization
that
we
get
is
actually
going
to
be
reaching
out
for
funding
right.
So
you
know
so.
I
know
you're
trying
to
not
drive
that,
but
I
mean
it's
it's.
I
think
everyone
here
expects
that
enf
is
the
first
place
we're
going
to
go
for
funds.
G
So
if
our
vision
that
we're
putting
together
doesn't
align
with
something
that
you
you
know,
you
feel
you
could
reasonably
fund,
then
please,
I
think
I
think
it's
just
efficient
to
let
us
know
I.
I
am
trying
to
give
us
a
very
efficient
path
to
move
forward,
so
we
don't
have
to
back
up
on
stuff
and
say:
oh
wait,
wait.
We
we
committed
this
much
money
to
this
and
we
forgot.
G
Even
this
thing
I
think
there's
a
way
if
we
all
work
together
quickly
that
we
can
move
forward
and
yeah
it's
a
little
centralized,
but
but
you
know
for
those
I
think
we
were
pretty
much
all
here.
Almost
all
of
us
here
were
on
the
on
the
the
you
know,
the
eos
launch
group,
you
know
eternal
eternal
calls,
and
I
I
don't
want
to
replicate
that.
I
think
we
need
to
move
faster.
So
that's
I'm
just
trying
to
set
up
something
so
that
we
don't
get
a
roadblock
at
the
end.
G
That's
the
question,
but
it's
not
a
question
immediately
for
now.
It's
like.
Let's
keep
this
in
our
mind
as
something
important
and
speak
up
if
we're
getting
too
far
astray
of
of
you
know
an
organization
that
you
think
we
can
we
can
we
can
you
know
that
you.
A
Live
with
so
the.
A
I
think
is
so
everything
you've
said.
I
agree
with
and
everything
that's
happened
so
far,
so
we're
in
our
fifth
meeting-
and
we
did
talk
about
this
in
in
the
first
meeting,
but
everything
that's
happened
so
far
and
the
direction
that
this
group
is
currently
going
in
aligns
with
what
I
envisioned
or
what
I
envisioned
when
I
launched
this
group
or
when
we,
when
we
you
know,
became
the
catalyst
for
this
to
even
exist
in
terms
of
funding.
A
Obviously,
we've
put
you
know
the
the
first
initial
trash
in
there
we
I
I
would
want
to
see
at
some
point
from
this
group
a
proposal
for
how
we
would
you
know,
remove
dependents,
100
dependence
on
the
enf
to
continue
funding
this
group
going
forward,
and
so
I
think
that
you
know
we
talked
about
that.
One
of
the
first
calls
that
we
even
talked
about
last
week
is:
you
know
who
is
a
member?
Are
there
membership
dues?
How
do
we
determine
you
know
kind
of?
How
do
we
split
the
pie
et
cetera?
A
I
envision
that
that's
going
to
occur
over
a
period
of
time.
I
believe
that
part
of
the
discussion
that
we're
right
we're
having
right
now
is
part
of
that,
and
so
everything
that's
happened
so
far
is
still
in
line
very
much.
So
with
the
way
that
I
saw
things
moving
forward,
the
way
that
I
saw
things
happening
there
are
other.
A
I
know
some
of
you
in
the
background
are
also
making
you
know
some
proposals
and
or
or
working
on
your
own
initiatives
that
could
come
and
feed
into
this
group,
and
so
you
know
their
ideas
with
either
liquidity
pools
that
people
talked
about,
or
perhaps
an
index
token
that
could
be
used
as
the
financial
representation
of
participation
within
this
group
and
how
that
all
aligns.
So
I
guess
all
that
to
say
just
keep
doing
what
you
guys
are
doing
it's
in
line
with
what
I
envisioned.
This
would
be
what
would
be
happening.
A
It
needs
to
continue
making
sense
from
a
business
point
of
view.
Obviously,
for
all
of
us
it
needs
to
be
making
sense
from
a
financial
point
of
view
for
all
of
us.
It
also
needs
to
make
sense
from
a
governance
point
of
view.
A
For
all
of
us-
and
this
is
where
I
think,
there's
still
the
challenges
of
how
this
is
going
to
come
about-
I
think
the
financial
part
of
things
is
actually
going
to
be
relatively
easy,
because
I
there's
a
bunch
of
ideas
that
have
been
proposed
and
just
in
in
general,
I
have
a
better
sense
of
how
that
could
be
structured.
A
Then
taking
that
will
be
different,
I
believe
than
the
governance
side
of
things
where,
if
we
went
with
a
financial
distribution-
and
we
just
mirrored
that
with
a
one-on-one
with
the
governance
distribution,
it
would
not
make
sense,
it
would
not
make
sense
for
anybody
who
is
not
eos,
because
the
financial
side
of
things
will
definitely
be
weighed
heavily
on
eos.
Just
because
of
you
know,
whatever
metrics
you
use,
eos
clearly
has
a,
I
guess,
a
larger
footprint
on
that
side
of
things.
A
So
then,
how
will
we
then
take
that
replicate
or
mirror
and-
or
you
know,
build
off
of
that
in
terms
of
ratios,
to
then
build
something
on
the
governance
side
of
things
where
it
makes
sense
for
those
who
don't
necessarily
have
the
treasuries
and
then
how
all
that
comes
together
forming
you
know
the
governance,
the
weight,
the
the
vote,
distribution,
etc,
etc.
A
I'm
you
know
looking
forward
to
what
this
group
comes
up
with,
I'm
working
in
the
background
on
being
able
to
propose
certain
things,
but
I
also
want
this
group
to
continue
doing
what
they're
doing,
because
you
guys
are
going
to
be
driving
this.
You
guys.
Are
you
know
the
discussions
that
we're
having
right
now
what
we've
had
last
week
and
stuff
you
are
going
in
that
direction
as
well.
So
I
don't
want
to
stop
anything,
that's
happening,
and
I
I
guess
I
can
say
that
there's
nothing
right
now.
A
I
A
Contributions
then
you
know
what
are
we
talking
about?
You
know,
after
this
250
k
runs
out.
Is
that
another
top
up
from
the
nf?
Are
we
in
a
position
at
that
time
to
have
perhaps
contribution
from
others?
I
think
it's
a
little
too
early
to
tell
yes,
if
we
do
spend,
let's
say
163
or
200
000
of
our
budget
on
the
branding.
In
my
opinion,
is
that
money
well
spent.
I
believe
so.
A
I
believe
that
without
the
branding
it's
going
to
be
very
difficult
to
align
behind
the
vision
and
it
all
starts
with
branding
and
all
starts
with
vision.
So
I
see
that
as
an
investment.
I
see
that
as
money
well
spent
and
I
think
that
that
will
feed
into
then
the
next
steps
and
the
next
steps
and
the
next
steps,
so
I
would
just
say,
keep
doing
what
you
guys
are
doing
and
there's
no
red
flags.
On
my
end,
great
I'm
happy.
G
A
A
A
Are
you
know
showing
up
so
let's
backtrack
for
a
bit?
This
is
the
first
time
in
four
years
that
all
or
arguably
all
of
the
eosio
chains
are
coming
together
to
work
that
in
itself
that
just
that
alone
is
is
worth
so
much
to
me
and
I
think
it's
worth
so
much.
I
hope
it's
worth
so
much
to
all
of
you
that
by
itself
I
think
we're
on
to
something
let's
continue
exploring.
That
is
what
I'm
trying
to
do.
Absolutely
it's
existential.
G
Right
and
it
this
is
it
in
in
the
literal
meaning
of
the
word:
it's
we
will
live
or
die
as
a
as
a
community
and
as
a
as
a
software
protocol,
depending
on
on
the
largely
depending
on
whether.
A
We
can
come
together
and
make
a
really
good
plan
here.
You
need
to
treat.
A
Like
we
need
to
if
this
were
a
business-
and
this
is
a
business,
so
I
agree
as
well
that
probably
the
next
step
should
be.
Where
do
we
incorporate
if
we
incorporate?
What
does
that
look
like
you
know?
What
are
you
know?
What
did
the
buyer's
laws?
Look
like
et
cetera
that
to
me
is
also
a
natural
next
step,
because
then
that
will
start
actually
forming
a
cohesive.
A
You
know
administrative
legal
entity
behind
what
it
is,
we're
trying
to
do
right
now
and
that
just
gets
us
one
step
closer
to
this
is
becoming
very
real.
The
chains
are
coming
together
and
they
in
once
once
that
entity
is
live.
Then
it
is
a
business.
Then
the
you
know
whether
or
not
it's
a
dao
or
or
whatever
approach
we
do.
It
becomes
one
it
becomes
an
entity
and
then
we
can
treat
it
as
a
business
as
we
always
have
should,
as
we
always
have.
A
G
Yeah
can
I
can
I
I
think
I
think
what
you're
saying
is
is
is
right
and
appropriate.
I
know
I've
talked
a
lot
and-
and
I
have-
and
so
I
don't
want
to
def-
I
definitely
don't
want
to
monopolize
the
meeting
and
I
and
I
don't
too
late
yeah.
I
know
that
that's
hap
at
the
risk
of
that.
Let
me
just
say
this
and
see
if
you
guys
are
interested
in
hearing
what
I
have
to
say
so
prior
to
joining
this
group.
G
I
for
some
time
have
known
that
something
much
like
this
had
to
come
together
and
I
didn't
know
the
exact
shape
and
form
of
it,
but
I
did
a
lot
of
thinking
about
it
and
I
just
in
the
interest
you
know,
and
let's
face
it,
there's
there's
only
so
many
efficient
ways
to
make
something
happen.
So
you
know
once
you
know
the
the
surrounding
needs,
so
I've.
G
Actually
you
know
I
could,
if
you,
if
you
guys,
want
in
this
meeting
or
another
time
or
something
we
may,
we
need
to
get
back
on
the
our
agenda
or
maybe
this
is
the
agenda.
I
don't
know
if,
but
if
anyone
wants
to
hear
the
the
the
broad
strokes
of
what
that
would
be
as
a
way
for
us
to
you
know,
even
if
it
just
turns
out
to
be
the
bad
versions
like
well,
you
know
it
helps
us
understand
what
we
don't
want
to
do.
G
That's
actually
a
good
process,
as
opposed
to
going
in
you
know,
I
think,
we're
I
think,
there's
a
little
bit
of
of
pussyfooting
around
with
you
know
anyone
saying
piss
anybody
off
or
or
overstep
or
anything,
but
as
but
the
function
of
that
is
that
we
haven't.
We
aren't
really.
It
doesn't
feel
in
the
two
meetings
that
I've
been
in
while
we're
doing
great
things
here,
it
doesn't
feel
like
anyone's
just
like
jumped
in
and
said,
look
here's
what
the
we
need
to
do
guys.
Here's
the
plan,
we're
gonna!
G
You
know
you
go
here,
you
go
here,
you
go
here.
This
is
where
you
know
and
then
and
then
have
a
broad
stroke
and
then
say:
okay,
let's
tear
apart
each
of
the
you
know.
If,
if
this
is
a
good
enough
initial
structure,
let's
get
people
working
on,
you
know
the
incorporation,
let's
get
people
working
on
the
branding,
let's
get
people
working
on
the
the
ongoing
funding
plan
and
let's
get
people
working
on
the
governance.
G
You
know
ideas
and
then
in
like
little
micro
sub
groups-
and
I
think
that's
I
think-
that's
going
to
be
a
much
better
process
than
doing
then
nibbling
around
from
the
outside
edge.
You
know
just
jumping
into
the
center,
that's
my!
But
but
again
I'm
I'm
one
person
here.
I've
already
monopolized
the
the
meeting,
so
I
I'll
leave
it
to
you
guys.
If
that's
you
think
a
good
way
to
go
or
not.
F
J
Yeah,
I
think
I
think,
there's
definitely
people
here
that
have
specific
levels
of
expertise
that
are
applicable
to
each
of
those
different
problems
that
should
be
attacked,
and
I
definitely
don't
disagree
with
some
people
taking
on
specific
responsibilities
that
are
bolstering
our
our
fuller
vision
of
what
we
want
to
achieve
totally
on
board.
With
that.
G
Anyone
else
rami,
I
I've,
actually
shared
I've,
actually
discussed
this
a
little
bit
with
rami.
You
know
a
month
ago
or
two
months
ago,
or
something
like
that.
I
gave
him
sort
of
a
you
know
a
broad
picture
that
I've
moved
on
from
in
many
important
parts,
but
it
was
basically
the
the
broad
strokes
of
what
we
do.
H
Hey
douglas,
are
you
talking
about
so
I
mean
kirsten
did
put
out
on
miro
right
kind
of
an
overview
of
the
different
areas
we've
been
looking
at
attacking,
I
would
say,
like
and
they've
been
labeled
here.
You
know
the
governance
and
the
branding
and
stuff.
Are
you
proposing
like
a
different
like,
and
I
think
that's
important
like
what
are
those
areas
that
we're
even
looking
at?
Is
that
what
you're
going
to
jump
in
and
kind
of
propose
and
what
those
look
like?
J
I
think
I
think
what
he's
saying
is
that,
like
part
of
what
we're
doing
now
is
we're
like
in
that
identification
portion
of
a
project
where
we're
trying
to
feel
out
what
we
need
to
do,
but
once
we
have
an
understanding
of
really
kind
of
what
we
need
to
do,
then
we
should
really
attack
that,
like
we
should
say,
okay,
we're
going
to
create
a
bunch
of
smaller
subcommittees
of
people
that
have
the
necessary
expertise
and
those
people
are
going
to
go
with
the
blessing
of
the
group
to
go
and
do
those
things
they'll
be
empowered
by
the
group
and
we'll
be
able
to
move
quicker
as
smaller
groups
than
we
would
as
a
whole
group
where
we
have
to
stop
and
like,
as
a
committee,
make
decisions
together
vote
on
everything
together
like
we'll
parallelize.
G
Yeah
that
way
groups
can
work
during
the
week
and
not
all
mark.
Not
all
of
our
work
has
to
happen
in
this
one
meeting
when
we're
all
together.
That's
that's
it.
This
should
be
more
about
when
we
as
we've
we've
created
like
little
tiny
committees
and
or
you're
just
a
person
just
like
with
justin
right
now
and
then
earlier,
and
they
come
in
and
they
say
okay
well,
so
this
is
the
this.
Is
you
know
that
you
guys
tasked
me
with
this?
This
is
what
I've
done.
G
You
know
we
we
are
going
to
get
more
stuff
in,
but
I
just
you
know
keeping
you
abreast
moving
on
and
then
next
to
you
know,
funding
the
funding
plan
team
or
whatever,
but
and
in
question
about
the
question
about
whether
this
has
to
do
how
this
fits
in
with
the
mirror
board
that
kirsten's
putting
it
together.
I
think
they
they
fit
very
well.
I
think
it's
just
it's.
G
We
need
to
do
all
those
things,
but
I
what
I
see
is,
but
I
also
see
that
as
a
process
of
working
around
the
edges
to
try
to
get
to
the
middle,
and
I
think
I
think
it
would-
I
don't
think
we
actually
have
to
do
that.
I
think
that
we
could
also
work
from
the
middle.
You
know
the
middle
in
in
this
scenario
is
the
idea
of
the
ultimate.
You
know
the
what
we're
making
right
so
we're
talking
about
how
you
know
we
need
to
figure
out
how
to
do
governance.
G
We
need
to
figure
out
these.
You
know
each
of
these
parts,
but
we
haven't
yet
said:
okay,
guys,
here's
what
we're
going
to
do
we're
going
to
create
an
organization,
we
don't
know
exact
sign
of
organization.
That's
too
that's
to
be
determined,
but
we
know
that
it's
going
to
be
an
organization
that
that
is
funded
by
most
likely
by
a
number
of
groups
that
are
that
you
know
that
are
represented
here
and
any
other
funding
sources
that
that
the
the
budget
team
could
come
up
can
can
you
know
the
grant?
G
Writing
team
can
come
up
with
it's
going
to
have
to
have
some
staff
and
administration,
starting
with
at
least
one
person
and
like
branding.
You
know,
as
I
was
saying,
in
the
chats
like
with
branding
that's
something
that
takes
time,
and
so
you
know
so,
if
we're
trying
to
meet
every
everything
match
up
in
a
month
or
something
we
should,
somebody
should
be
working
on
on
identifying
who
can
be
operating.
G
You
know
who
can
who
can
run
this
and
and
and
start
finding
somebody,
because
if
we
wait
until
the
end,
it's
gonna,
you
know,
then
we
are
not
to
have
that
so,
and
the
governance
rules
right.
Somebody
should
be
working
on.
How
do
we?
What
is
a
proposal
that
we
can
bring
forward
for
how
we
decide
how
to
spend
that
money
that
that
others?
You
know
that
the
funding
that
the
grant
writing
team
has
has
brought
together
or
the
membership
team
or
subscription.
You
know
the
the
accounts.
G
Receivable
has
how
we're
going
to
take
that
money
and
use
it
and
and
make
and
make,
and
what's
the
process
for
making
decisions?
Does
everybody
have
the
exact
same
vote
is:
do
some
people,
you
know,
have
more
vote
than
others,
and
what,
if
so,
what's
that
based
on
is
that
based
on
financial?
Is
that
based
on
participation?
Is
that,
based
on
what
there's
a
lot
of
ways
to
do
it?
G
But
but
that's
another
bucket,
that's
another
thing
that
we
have
to
solve
and
then
and
then
how
you
know
a
rough,
a
rough
idea
of
whether
we
are
going
to
have
employees
that
we
that
you
know
this
this
entity
is
going
to
have
employees
who
are
who
you
know
we
we
try
to
make
this.
You
know
a
real
business
that
they
that
they,
that
you
know
the
devs
work
for,
and
that's
just
there.
G
You
know,
as
it
was
similar
to
to
block
one,
and
if
you
know
what
what
the
like.
You
know,
whether
it's
gonna
be
like
that
or
whether
we're
gonna
have
a
series
of
ongoing
contractors
or
we're
gonna.
Have
you
know
we're
just
gonna
be
making
proposals
and
then
having
people
come
to
us
to
to
you
know,
there's
those
are
to
you
know,
make
you
know,
make
deals
on
fulfilling
those.
G
That's
three
very
you
know
three
very
different
ways
to
approach
the
the
ongoing
staffing
and
how
things
are
done
and
they
have
their
pros
and
cons
and,
and
you
know,
different
cost
structures
and
whatnot.
So
those
are
the
things
we
have
to.
We
have
to
figure
out.
I
think
that's
you
know.
Basically,
what's
the
entity:
where
will
it
be
all
the
little
details?
How
is
it
going
to
get
money?
How
is
it
you
know
in
the
future
and
and
with
probably
with
an
eye
towards
how's
it
going
to
get
money?
G
You
know
in
the
year
one
and
how's
it
gonna
get
and
also
you
know,
how's
it
gonna
get
money
in
year.
Five,
because
that
probably
you
know
we,
it
has
to
have
an
idea
towards
evolving
to
a
self-sufficient,
or
even
you
know,
revenue
positive
entity
so
and
then
how
we're
going
to
make
decisions
that
are
fair
and
equitable
and
and
and
maintain
consensus
within
the
the
group
of
participants
about
how
to
spend
the
money,
because
that
will
always
be
that's
always
going
to
be
a
challenge.
G
How
we're
going
to
you
know
it's
all
great
when
we're
when
we
can't
wait
to
work
together,
but
there
will
be,
there
will
be
hard
questions,
and
so
we
need
a
process
that
that
allows
us
to
work
through
those
without
you
know,
without
fracturing,
and
of
course
we
all
understand
that,
because
this
is
this
is
blockchain.
That's
that's
exactly
what
we
do
so
and
you
know,
and
then
we
need
branding
and
then
we
need.
You
know
staffing
and
hiring
at
least
ideas.
G
I
think
those
are
like
the
five
six
big
buckets
that
we
need,
and
so
I
think
that
all
those
other
things
that
are
that
are
on
kirsten's
mind
map
relate
to
that
in
one
way
or
what
we
have.
What
we
haven't
done
is
gone.
Okay,
well,
you
know,
is
drawn
sort
of
the
the
venn
diagram
of
which
of
those
buckets
each
of
the
things
fits
in,
which
I
think
would
be
very
useful
for
us
to
to
connect
together
because
it
feels
very
until
we
have
that
to
me.
G
It
feels
disconnected
it
feels
like
we're.
It
feels
academic
as
opposed
to
hey
guys.
We
got
we
got
a
month.
You
know
we
got
a
grant.
We
got
a
small
business
association
grant
to
make
this
thing,
and-
and
you
know
we
have
a
chance
to
get
funded
if
we
have
a
good
enough
plan,
but
if
we
don't
you
know,
but
but
you
know
that
money
is
going
to
run
out.
So
how
much
do
we
want
to
spend
on
a
logo
and
how
much
you
want
to
spend
on?
G
H
No
that's
great
thanks
douglas
and
I
think
your
your
high
level
buckets
align
well
with
christians
and
maybe
that
maybe
that's
a
quick
decision.
We
could
make
one
of
the
big
buckets
it
seems
you
have
there.
Kirsten
is
like
kind
of
this
whole
core
development
and-
and
there
were
some
of
those
other
kind
of
like
things
we
talked
about
these
gap,
analyses
and
things
that
may
not
really
be
as
relevant
and
douglas.
What
I'm
hearing
from
you
is,
let's
move
from
beyond
kind
of
we've
identified
those,
and
it
sounds
like
we.
H
G
H
C
Yeah,
I
think,
there's
we.
We
have
like
a
general
discussion
here
now
and
I
think
there
are
kind
of
different
approaches
in
because
the
meetings
that
I
attended
douglas-
that
that
you
were
not
in
the
impression
that
I
personally
had
was
that
we
we
don't
want
this
kind
of
centralized
organization
right
now,
because
we
we
try
to
get
the
consensus
of
the
people
in
the
call
and
have
everybody
point
out
his
opinion
on
the
topics
and
gather
the
topics
that
need
to
be
done.
C
And
it's
exactly
that
that,
like
eric
said,
it
is
initially
find
out.
What
are
the
topics
that
we
need
to
cover
within
this
work
group,
and
and
can
we
find
some
consensus
of
on
most
of
them?
So
so
we
can
can
start
to
define
the
the
work
packages
and
obviously
the
approach
that
you
you're
you're
proposing
now
is-
is
rather
to
to
yeah.
We
know
that
we
need
to
do
all
those
things
here.
That's
great!
C
It's
good
to
have
the
mind
map,
but
please,
let's
discuss
about
an
organization
and
funding,
fundraising
and
everything
and
make
it
more
centralized
approach
than
than
the
group
was
initially
so
so
from
that
perspective,
it's
a
fair
point.
We
from
my
perspective,
I
what
I
would
like
to
do,
though,
is
you
seem
to
have
a
very
clear
idea
on
that
douglas,
so
so
douglas
is,
is
no
longer
here
by
the
way
he
dropped
okay.
So
so
maybe
we
could
well.
C
In
fact,
I
I
would
like
to
to
to
to
ask
syed
or
or
any
of
the
other
trains
that
that
haven't
been
speaking
up
until
now
and
and
giving
giving
their
impressions,
because
the
the
communication
has
been
a
little
one-sided
from
currently
so
so
so
yet
or
or
the
other
change.
If
you,
if
you
want
to
kind
of
state
what
your
opinion
is.
C
Because
douglas
has
outlined
his
thoughts
on
that
and
generally
we
had
some
agreement
to
this,
but
I
would
like
to
involve
the
other
trains
and
then
have
your
opinions
too.
Of
course,
right.
D
Yeah,
I
think
I
mean
so
we
discussed
initially,
I
mean
our
first
meeting
that,
like
potentially
this
group
could
be
a
way
to
also
aggregate
like
what
what
sort
of
things
we
should
prioritize
in
terms
of
like
development
of
eos
io.
That
would
be
useful,
for,
I
think
all
chains.
D
I
did
think
that
was
useful,
but
I
mean
starting
from
a
branding
perspective
is
good
too
I'm
like
once
again.
No
no
chain
here
really
advertises
the
fact
that
they
use
eos
io
and
changing
that
or
being
able
to
change
that
in
a
way
that
has
like
good
branding
and
is
something
other
than
eos
io,
and
something
that
consumers
and
other
users
of
chains
see
as
like
a
positive
like
and
they're
proud
of
the
fact
to
share
something
that
their
chain
uses.
Whatever
this
new
brand
would
be
called.
D
I
I
think
that's
a
good
priority,
I'm
I
would
be
on
board
with
that
in
in
the
immediate
term,
and
that
seems
like
something
achievable
so
yeah.
I
would
be
fine
with
that.
C
Okay,
so
my
my
proposal
would
be
that
that
maybe
douglas
and
one
or
two
other
people
out
of
this
group
that
that
could
volunteer
now,
I
would
say
eve.
It
would
be
good
if
you
also
in
kind
of
that
work
group,
could
could
kind
of
get
get
into
offline
into
an
offline
discussion
and
and
work
on
a
proposal
of
how
this
kind
of
organization
and
like
mission
statement,
could
look
like
and
and
have
something
prepared
for
the
next
meeting.
C
So
so
we
can
discuss
this
and
and
decide
on
that
in
in
that
next.
Next
task
is
that
is
that
a
reasonable
proposal
so
and
if
so,
who
would
who
would
speak
up
and
say
yeah?
I'm
I'm
happy
to
join
douglas
and
ease
in
in
that
discussion
to
to
to
make
a
proposal
for
exactly
this
purple
section
that
I
created
during
during
the
the
the
douglas
words.
C
C
Okay,
so
that's
I
I
take
this
as
a
no,
which
is
great
then
who
who
would
be
willing
or
happy
to
join
in
to
the
discussion
with
eve.
I
I
assume
that
that
you,
you
are
going
to
be
a
part
of
that
discussion.
A
Yeah,
I'm
good
with
that.
Essentially,
I'm
I'm
very
much
at
line
with
what
douglas
said.
I
know
what
I
would
do,
because
I
just
did
it
with
the
enf
and
so
part
of
it
is.
I
I
very
much
like
the
centralized,
extremely
quick.
A
Let's
do
something
and
then
let's
decentralize
it
afterwards
versus
the
let's
not
do
anything
for
five
weeks
in
a
row
and
because
we're
afraid
of
stepping
on
each
other's
toes
and
I'm
happy
that
essentially,
the
group
seems
to
be
heading
in
this
direction,
so
I
would
gladly
participate
in
that.
A
It
would
be
great
for
somebody
else
to
join
outside,
of
which
I
would
believe
douglas
would
very
much
volunteer
for
this,
but
outside
of
douglas,
and
I,
if
somebody
else,
one
or
two
other
people
would
like
to
join
that'd
be
great,
if
not
I'll,
gladly
work
with
douglas
as
well
and
present
something
to
the
group
next
week.
C
Yeah,
my
proposal
would
be
to
have
at
least
two
other
trains
stepping
into
this.
G
It
all
and
or
if
we
could
get
people
who
are
already
on
multiple
chains,
then
we
could
that
we
could
bring
in
you
know
you
know
more
people
more.
We
could
include
more
people's
ideas.
I
actually
don't
think
that
this
is
going
to
be
terrible.
You
know
the
there's
pretty
simple
way.
G
You
organize
what
I
was
proposing
and
I
don't
think
anyone
is
going
to
you
know,
make
it
terrible
for
any
chain,
but
it'd
be
great
if
somebody
like
aaron
or
romney
or
anyone
else
here,
who's
on
you
know,
who's
working
on
two
or
three
chains
would
be
able
to
to
to.
You
know
step
up
for
that
as
well.
G
G
G
If,
if
I,
since
I
got
you
know,
volunt
told
to
to
be
part
of
this,
the
way
I
would
run
it
is,
or
you
know
get
it
kicked
off.
Not
worry,
you
know
not
worry
about
hurting
anybody's
feelings.
Not
I
mean.
I
don't
think
this
is
that
kind
of
project.
Let's
just
like
push
forward.
Whoever
has
the
ideas
start
talking.
G
We
write
it
down,
we
we,
you
know,
and
we
come
up
with
something
I
mean
I
I
think
we
can
come
up
with
a
page
that
kind
of
summarizes
what
I
already
said,
and
then
we
can
look
at
it
and
go
and
see
what
you
know.
First
draft
fixes
we
need
obvious
ones.
We
need
to
make
and
then
just
bring
that
back.
I
mean
that'd
be
our
task.
We
could
do
it
in
an
hour.
Okay,.
C
So
so
then,
then
still
I
would
I
would.
I
would
opt
in
and
say
one
person
of
a
different
of
another
chain
that
I.
A
Yeah,
that's
joseph
from
wax
or
oig
in
wax.
C
I
I
until
yet
I
don't
know
all
your
voices,
so
it
really
helps
me
if
you
kind
of
drop
name
and
and
chain
for
for
the
next
one
or
two
meetings
that
really
helps
me
to
get
along
okay,
so
we've
got
four
people
here.
It's
the
yeah,
it's
the
fellowship
of
the
of
the
organization.
C
And
so
you
you
will
you
will
start
working
on
that
jointly.
So
if,
if
you,
if
you
would
like
me
to
join
in
to
kind
of
moderate,
I'm
I'm
happy
to
do
that
and
and
trying
to
to
get
like
the
the
monologue
time
of
douglas
down
to
like
40
to
50
percent,
if
you're.
A
Impossible,
but
no,
joking
aside,
I
I
I
would
like
you
to
join
if,
if
the
others
are
okay
with
that,
I
think
that
that
would
be
good
you're
doing
a
great
job
and
having
somebody
who
takes
the
notes,
while
everybody
else
shares
ideas
is,
is
quite
useful
yup.
I
agree.
C
Excellent
yeah
I'll
be
happy
to
do
that,
and
this
seems
that
I
will
be
tasked
to
organize
this
meeting.
Then,
if.
C
L
F
C
So
we've
got
the
setting
here
trying
to
get
the
consensus
again.
Anybody
who's
got
any
objections
against
this
way
of
moving
forward.
Then
please
speak
up
now.
C
Okay,
three
two
one,
nobody
excellent!
We
will
move
on
with
that.
So
so
we
basically
have
that
work
group
working
on
organization
and
purpose.
This
is
awesome.
Okay,
so
then,
going
to
a
very
small
topic,
we
discussed
setting
up
a
gyro
confluence.
C
To
start
this,
we
we
had
some
discussions
in
telegram
as
usual
and
if,
if
jaira
is
coming
onto
the
plate,
various
people
speak
up
and
say
I
hate
it.
I
know
that
so,
but
have
you
had
any
chance
to
start
and
been
setting
this
up,
zach
or
ease.
M
A
I
thought
that's
where
we
left
off
last
week
was
that
zach
would
work
with
you
kirsten,
but
that
you
would
be
doing
the
heavy
lifting,
because
he
doesn't
have
the
the
know-how
of
what
to
do,
but
that
you'd
be
preparing
that
for
him.
That
was
my
record.
C
Yeah
I
I
just
need
to
have
this
the
jarrah
instance
and
the
confluence
instance
set
up
so
so
we
can
start
on
that.
So
then,
then
we
will
take
this
one
again
and
zach.
We
will
coordinate
like
a
meeting
to
to
discuss
how
we
do
this
in
detail.
So.
M
Perfect
yeah
I'll
just
need
we
could
do
it
in
dm
or
whatever,
but
just
your
github
username
would
be
what
I
would
need
on
my
end
and
then
we
could
discuss
a
few.
You
may
take
some
extra
steps
too.
C
Excellent
okay-
I
I
will
come
back
to
you
regarding
that.
Okay,
so,
in
regard
of
the
budget
plan
that
that
was
is
obviously
it
makes
sense
if
we're
spending
like
60
to
75
percent
of
the
existing
bastard.
Currently,
I
think
that's
something
that
that
we
need
to
take
on
for
for
one
these,
maybe
the
smaller
group
will
come
up
with
the
budgeting
idea,
but
we
we
need
to
take
that
on
to
one
of
the
next
agendas
we
had
this
required
administration
resource.
C
We
discussed
that
and
I
can
just
put
that
away,
develop
a
funding
proposal.
Obviously,
that's
gonna
fall
on
the
time
when
we
know
how
much
budget
we
need
anyway.
So
we're
moving
on
that.
I
had
like
a
great
idea.
We
could
do
like
a
5
billion
ido
and
do
this
so
great.
D
C
A
This,
let's
move
on
kirsten,
can
we
go
back
to
branding
please
just
the
the
the
the
250k
and
the
percentage
of
you
know
what
justin
proposed
or
the
cost
that
that
is
being
proposed.
Anyways.
I
would
like
to
to
motion
that
we
actually
accept
the
range
that
is
being
proposed,
which
is
roughly
165
to
200
000
for
branding.
A
I
don't
think
that
if
I
believe
that
it's
going
to
underlie
everything
that
we
do
and
knowing
the
amount
of
time
that
is
required
to
go
through
that
process,
it's
months
delaying
that
is,
I
believe,
negative
to
the
rest
of
the
group,
and
I
believe
it's
a
cost
that
we
will
inevitably
need
to
absorb,
and
it
will
you
know
it
will
be
the
foundation
for
how
this
group
exists
and
if
we
can
rally
around
the
brand
and
the
vision
that
will
make
everything
else
flow
much
smoother
afterwards,
and
so
I
would
like
to
motion
that
we
give
justin
the
approval
from
the
rest
of
the
group
that
he
has
it.
A
You
know
between
160
to
200
thousand
dollars
to
make
the
decision
to
choose
one
of
the
branding
companies
that
he's
gonna
outreach
to
and
that
he
moved
forward.
With
that
point
of
information.
G
That
means
I'd
like
to
I'd
like
to
ask
a
question
before
we
can
fully
join.
You
know,
discuss
that,
and
that
is
I
I
agree
with
what
you're
saying
about
this,
about
this
probably
being
our
largest
expense,
but
I
think
that
there's
also
going
to
be.
You
know
a
significant
legal
expense
and
I.
G
On
that
front,
okay,
I
I'm
all
for
I'm
all
for
giving
justin
that
that
freedom-
and-
I
think
that's-
I
think,
that's
right,
but
I
also
think
that
we
need
to
in
the
intervening
time
before
we
actually,
you
know,
pull
the
trigger
on
on
on
making
a
deal.
We
we
do
have
to
have
a
decent
idea
of
what
our
legal
is
going
to
be.
What
our
you
know,
what
some
of
those
other
buckets
of
you
know,
starting
at
starting
a
entity,
are
likely
to
be
because
I
don't
want
to.
G
I
don't
want
us
to.
You
know,
spend
everything
on
a
you
know.
I
don't
want
a
car
with
the
coolest
paint
job
in
the
world
that
has
no
engine.
You
know
and-
and
I
know
none
of
us
want
that,
so
I
I
think
it
I
do
think
it's
I
do
think
we
we
have
to
know
have
some
idea,
even
what
the
other
things
are
right.
So
there's
legal,
that's
there's,
there's
there's
some
kind
of
way
to
be.
G
You
know
looking
for
you
know,
basically,
a
executive
search
for
somebody
to
be
running
this
right.
There's
and
those
some
of
those
things
might
not
cost
anything.
We
often
do
all
of
them,
and
and
traditionally
they
do
have
a
cost.
G
So
that's
my
concern
with
just
giving
him
carte
blanche
with
200
000
of
you
know,
of
the
250
000,
even
though
I
totally
agree
with
all
the
things
you
said
about
how
important
it
is,
but
it's
hard
for
me
to
reconcile
those
two
and
just,
and
just
you
know,
give
him
that
check,
knowing
that
we
have
a
lot
to
to
to
you
know
to
accomplish,
and
we
haven't
even
really,
you
know
enumerated
all
the
all
the
tasks
which
hopefully
we'll
have
some
idea
about
when
we
come
together
next
week
that
I'll
we'll
kind
of
add
that
as
a
part
of
the
deliverables
for
this
mini
group,.
C
Yeah
I
I
get
I
I
agree
to
that,
though.
C
At
some
point
I
I
I'm
happy
is
that
that
you
are
kind
of
giving
the
the
the
the
the
go
flag
for
for
this
amount
for
for
branding,
obviously
that
there
will
be
like
trademark
registry
costs
and
whatever
so
so
that
that
might
be
not
sufficient,
but
on
the
other
hand,
if,
if,
if
we're
not
getting
this
result,
we
might
end
up
discussing
this
in
the
next
two
meetings
again,
so
I
I'm
I'm
happy
if,
if
the
group
decides
to
move
forward
with
that
eve,
when
you
said
you
you
would
take
on
those
legal
things,
what
exactly
would
be
the
the
topics
that
you
could
cover
in
that
respect.
A
A
We
can
help
offset
those
costs
and
or
absorb
those
costs
well
for
one
we're
in
canadian
dollars
and
as
everybody
knows
like
100,
canadian
dollars
is
about
five
dollars
u.s,
and
so
you
know,
there's
there's
very
much
economies
much
cheaper
in
back
in
canada,
so
it
would
make
sense
to
go
down
that
route
again.
A
We've
also
done
a
lot
of
the
work
in
order
to
incorporate
the
eos
network
foundation,
and
so
a
lot
of
the
previous
work
that
we
did
to
figure
out
how
we
would
get
set
up
would
be
able
to
be
leveraged
by
this
group.
So
all
of
their
opinion,
letters
and-
or
you
know,
draft
of
bylaws,
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
that
could
be
shared,
which
would
help
offset
costs
simply
because
we
wouldn't
need
to
go
through
the
exercise
again.
D
A
A
E
I
I
would
just
add
quickly
that
the
the
money
is
to
be
spent
over
three
months,
and
you
know
if
it
was
needed
that
process
could
stop.
You
would
just
get
less
of
the
the
work
done,
but
ultimately.
A
This
would
have
been
a
failed
attempt
and
that's
a
risk
that
the
enf
obviously
is
willing
to
take
on.
By
giving
this
group
a
starting
budget.
E
A
A
A
Seconds
should
they
agree,
and
then
we
need
to
take
a
vote
as
per
the
decision
that
we
made
last
week,
which
still
stands
that
every
chain
gets
one
vote.
G
So
I'm
gonna
withdraw
my
my
you
know
objection
or
you
know,
with
my
point
of
information,
if
you're
have,
if
you're
happy
with
that,
I
you
know
I,
but
then
I
think
that
we
can
go
ahead
and
vote
and
I'll.
Second,
the
motion
then.
C
Okay,
so
then,
then,
I
would
because
aaron
is
added
to
the
chat
that
if
we
really
need
to
have
like
website
designs
and
everything
from
day
one
as
this
is
bringing
up
the
cost
and
we
could
kind
of
scope
that
needs
and
and
then
work
on
that
at
a
later
stage.
That's
a
valid
point.
From
my
perspective
and
and
also
knowing
that
with
the
enf,
you
did
some
design
works
already,
which
you're
going
to
see
you're
going
to
share.
C
A
At
the
moment,
so
I
guess
to
answer
one
of
the
questions
that
aaron
asked.
I
would
personally
remove
the
web
design
side
of
things,
because
I
would
only
put
the
vision,
branding
logo
et
cetera
behind
that
without
the
web
design
at
this
time.
But
I
know
the
way
that
this
particular
agency
works
and
you
pay
per
hour
and
you,
you
reserve
a
certain
amount
of
hours.
So,
as
justin
mentioned,
the
website
is
the
web.
Design
is
let's
say
in
month
three
or
four.
A
You
would
simply
not
proceed
with
that,
but,
yes,
I
would
remove
that
from
the
scope
of
war
and,
yes,
I
would
confirm
with
them
and
or
any
of
the
other
agencies,
because
I
I
would
not
what
I'm
motioning
is
not
that
justin
proceed
with
r101,
I'm
motioning
that
we
give
him
the
leeway
to
be
able
to
wait
for
the
other
proposals
and
make
the
determination
as
to
which
one
to
proceed
with,
I
would
add,
in
their
scope
of
work,
to
ensure
that
what
they're
going
to
do
is
to
propose
three
options
at
the
minimum.
A
But
let's
let's
go
with
three
and
that
then
in
you
know
in
three
months
or
whenever
that
that
that
exercise
is
done,
that
he
then
come
back
to
the
group
with
here
are
the
proposals
and
here's
the
vision
behind
each
to
your
logos
etc
behind
each
and
then
the
group
at
that
time
decide
with
which
one
they
want
to
go
with.
B
Aaron,
I
believe
so
yeah.
I
was
just
looking
for
a
good
opportunity
to
bring
these
things
up.
You
guys
were
talking
about
raising
more
funding,
and
I
was
thinking
about
ways
to
optimize.
The
funding
we
have
potentially-
and
I
think
an
important
point
to
bring
up
is
that
the
branding
we're
engaging
with
on
now,
I'm
assuming
is
for
the
product
and
in
the
future.
This
organization
that
is
being
discussed
will
also
need
branding.
E
E
The
assumption
I've
been
taking
at
the
moment-
and
maybe
this
is
an
incorrect
assumption-
is
that
the
foundation
would
have
the
same
name
as
the
product.
But
if
clarify
that
it's
different,
then
let
me
know
and
I'll
make
sure
that's
covered
with
the
agencies.
A
G
L
G
A
Covered
generally,
we
still
need
to
take
a
a
vote.
Sorry
kirsten
there
was
a
motion,
a
second
clarification
on
the
motion,
essentially
on
what
is
being
asked,
and
I
believe
we
actually
need
to
take
a
vote.
As
per
the
rules
we
established
last
week.
C
You're
right
so
is
anybody
of
the
the
change
in
the
call
on
the
call
against
the
decisions
or
the
proposals
that
have
just
been
made
then
speak
up.
Please.
N
Now
I
vote
yes
on
eve's
proposal.
D
C
Okay,
joseph
is
a
thumbs
up,
so
I
very
rapist
being
a
yes,
okay
good.
Then
then
we,
as
far
as
I
can
see
all
chains
voted
yes,
so
we
move
on
with
with
the
proposed
way
forward,
great.
C
Excellent,
so
then
we
did
have.
C
Okay,
aaron
is
just
adding
some
some
more
comments
in
regard
of
the
domain
registrations
and
so
on
so
justin
aaron.
I
think
it
would
be
great
if
you
could
kind
of
touch
base
after
the
call
to
to
kind
of
have
aaron's
aaron's
points
which
are
very
valid
to
and
add
them
to
to
your
considerations.
K
A
Include
in
there
aaron
just
because
you're
gonna
be,
I
guess,
reaching
out
the
not
not
just
the
domains,
but
also
the
application
for
trademark,
which
is
very
different.
Let's
say
than
the
nice
classification.
It's
about
reservation.
I
think
it's
maybe
two
thousand
dollars
canadian.
That
would
amount
to
five
thousand
dollars
u.s
for
the
three
in
total
type
of
thing,
so
that
we
make
sure
that
that
they're
available,
so
we
reserve
the
namespace
or
reserve
the
trademark.
G
I
have
a
I
have
an
attorney
in
florida
who
is
less
expensive
than
that
if
we
were
going
to
be
doing
a
u.s
trademark-
registration,
oh
sure,
yeah.
So
so,
once
once
we
get
to
that
point
I'll,
just
I'll
just
you
know
give
whoever's
in
charge
I'll
make
the
introduction,
and
I
think
it
may
be
a
bit
of
a
savings
there.
C
Right
yeah,
then
maybe
I
will
propose,
because
thieves
took
the
task
to
to
look
at
the
legal
things
that
can
you
please
already
pass
the
details
to
eve.
So
so
he
already
has
this.
A
C
A
Douglas
daniel
joseph
and
I
are
going
to
be
getting
on
a
call
and
let's,
let's
bring
that
up
in
the
call,
because
that
would
fall
with
the
rest
of
the
work
from
this
mini
sub
group,
yeah,
yeah.
Okay,
all.
A
G
Yeah,
indeed,
we
don't
want
to
we,
wouldn't
we
have
to
find
something
that
has
that
has
trade.
You
know
the
the
same.
You
know
level
one
research
that
we
do
on
anything.
You
know
that
we're
naming
we
have
to
make
sure
that
there's
trademark
the
trademark
is
is
clear
and
gettable.
We
have
to
make
sure
that
the
you
know
we
have
to
make
sure
the
the
the
suitable
domain
name
is
available
and
and
and
all
that
right,
it's
all.
C
Yeah,
so
so,
okay,
so
just
pass
that
to,
I
call
it
oap
group
now
so
plus
pass
that
to
the
oap
group,
please
so
so
we
have
the
name
of
that
attorney
and
we
don't
lose
it
and
don't
forget
excellent.
So
then
I
I
would
try
to
still
jump
back
to
the
branches
that
we
left
out
last
time,
in
fact,
just
to
cover
one
of
some
of
the
actions.
G
I'm
I
have
not
yet
I
am
due.
I
am
scheduled
for
after
this
call
to
do
a
video
to
like
about
three
hours
from
now
to
to
record
a
demo
and
walk
a
bigger
demo
and
walk
through
so
and
hopefully
that's
only
gonna
take
you
know
a
day
or
two
to
get
to
get
out.
C
Excellent,
thank
you.
Then.
We
did
discuss
validation
of
required
additional
participants.
Do
we
have
any
updates
here
in
regard
of
people
that
that
are
missing?
C
We
don't
have
to
discuss
for
a
long
time,
just
any
anybody
that
came
across
your
your
mind
in
the
last
week
that
we
might
need
to.
A
Add
no,
but
just
to
know
that
eva
has
not
participated
in
any
of
the
calls.
So
far,
so
I
don't
know
if
that's
lack
of
knowing
that
we're
having
these
calls
and
or
or
whether
or
not
they
just
simply
can't
join,
but
that
is
the
one
participant
in
that
list
that
has
not
attended
a
call
so
far.
G
Last
week
about
that,
I
mentioned
that
there's
there's
two
other
organizations
that
I
know
about
that
are
that,
like
eva,
are,
are
building
on.
You
know,
eos
io
implementations,
one
is
mythical
games
and-
and
I
I
don't
know
if
we've
reached
out
to
them,
but
I
don't
know
why
we
wouldn't.
If
we
were
reaching
out,
you
know
they
make
blocks
and
or
I
can't
can't
remember
what
it's
called
blinkos.
That
said,
thank
you,
and
so
I
think
we
should
reach
out
to
them.
G
G
J
G
We
did
we
had
that
discussion
last
week,
but
then
we're
also
talking
about
eva,
and
so,
if
we
are
talking
about
hey
reaching
out
to
eva,
then
then
you
know
we
should
reach
out
to
mythical
games
as
well.
If
we're,
if
you
know,
if
that's
out
of
scope,
that's
fine,
but
but
I
don't
know
why
we
would
reach
out
to
one
and
not
the
other.
C
C
Said
well,
eva
was
in
in
the
initial
discussion.
So
so
we
wouldn't
want
to
ask
the
other
ones
but
yeah.
If
everybody,
you
know
turn
it
around
again.
If
nobody
has
any
objections,
then
we
can
approach
mythical
games
and
blancos.
Actually
I
need
to
have
one
of
those
blanco
things
anyway.
So
so
that's
a
cool
project.
Indeed,
so
does
anybody
have
contact
to
blancos.
J
C
A
I
mean
if,
if
we're
gonna
go
down,
that
line
voice
reached
out
to
me
this
week,
bullish
reached
out
to
me
this
week
and
youtube
utu.1
reached
out
to
me
this
week
as
well.
G
So
do
we
have
a
do?
Do
we
have
you
know,
do
we
have
a
do?
We
have
a
qualification
right,
but
one
way
to
look
at
this
is
simply
hey.
It's
got
to
be,
it's
got
to
be
a
public
chain,
and
that
means
you
know
we'll
you
know
mythical
and
eva
can
join
us
later.
Another
would
be
it
could
be.
You
know
it
could
be
public
chains
and
any
real
existing
business.
That's
that's.
G
You
know
a
real
existing
business,
that's
that's
actually
built
on
it
on
a
chain
and
they
should
have
the
opportunity
to
be
here
and
and
may
or
may
not
get
the
same
vote,
but
at
least
be
you
know
in
charge.
We
can
determine
that
later
and
then
and
then,
specifically
with
voice
and
bullish
there
you
know:
there's
there
there's
certainly
reasons
given
the
history
of
this
to
to
just
include
them.
If
that's
what
the
group
wants,
there's
also
reasons
to
consider,
including
them.
G
So
that
would
be
something
that
we
would
probably
have
to
discuss.
Did
they
reach
out.
L
A
Plus
group,
or
just
you're
in
communication
with
them,
no,
they
reached
out
talking
about
well,
yes
and
no
sorry
for
a
shitty
answer,
but
they
didn't
reach
out
because
they
listened
to
last
week's
video
or
because
of
this
groups
in
particular
they
reached
out
because
they
know
that
essentially,
the
community
is
now
leading
an
effort
in
in
redirecting
where
yasayo
as
a
whole
is
going
and
they
wanted
to
see
where
they
might
fit
into
the
road
map.
So
it's
a
yes
on
that
front,
but
it's
no!
A
J
Listen,
I
I
just
wanna
like
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
history
between
these
networks
that
we're
participating
in
and
block
one
and
bullish
and
voice,
etc.
J
I
think
disincluding
them
from
future
development
is
probably
not
in
everyone's
best
interests,
especially
if
we're
talking
about
not
them,
leading,
I
think,
if
they're
just
participating
from
either
an
observer
status
or
if
we're
going
to
be
requiring
dues,
then
having
more
participants
is
going
to
lead
to
both
a
wider
range
of
valuable
opinions,
like
their
views
from
an
enterprise
perspective,
is
valuable
from
you
know,
a
development
perspective
and
a
business
perspective
and
from
a
dues
perspective,
then
it's
absolutely
valuable
simply
because
it
enriches
the
coffers
and
allows
us
to
do
more
with
the
members
that
would
be
party
too
so
like.
J
I
think
we
have
to
be
careful
about
how
how
we
define
like
what
we
actually
want,
not
based
on
previous
previous
history
and
emotional
state,
but
what's
good
for
the
technology
that
we
want
to
build.
J
Hold
on
hold
on
I,
I
wasn't
finished
as
as
an
extension
of
that.
I
think
that,
as
far
as
anyone
that's
interested
in
participating
at
a
network
level
is
participate
interested
in
participating
in
this
group.
I
think
that
we
should
be
inclusive.
We
should
be
allowing
that
not
necessarily
allowing
votes,
but
they
should
definitely
be
able
to
join
the
calls
and
listen
in.
I
think
that
that
benefits
everybody.
J
I
would
consider
it.
You
know
observer
status
at
the
un
very
much
a
similar
vein
and
if
we're
talking
about
defining
who
gets
a
vote
and
we
we
have
a
private
chain,
that's
interested
in
having
a
vote
on
the
future
of
the
protocol
or
the
the
project.
I
think
that
requiring
some
level
of
financial
commitment
to
the
project
is
a
reasonable
threshold,
whether
that's
private
or
whether
that's
public.
C
Okay,
so
so
then
we
have
two
topics
here.
Then
first
one
is
that
we.
C
C
O
Yes,
so
hey
guys,
I
just
joined
the
call
as
an
eva.
I
was
in
the
telegram
chat
and
now
I
just
joined
so
welcome.
I
am
glad
to
be
here
guys,
I'm
glad
to
be
participating
in
these
calls.
So
just
on
the
point
before
to
follow
up
on
never
participation.
Now
we're
good
we're
going
to
participate
in
this
class.
C
Great
thank
you
great
to
have
you
here,
rafael,
so
somebody
justin
is
asking
who's
utu.
I
actually
haven't
heard
that
name
either.
I
hope
I
didn't
misspell
it.
A
C
A
Utu.1
or
period
one
o-n-e,
just
like
block.1
but
utu.1
period
and
not
hyphen,
it
is
a
an
application
that
reached
out
to
me
this
week,
they've
been
building
aniosa
on
a
private
chain,
they're,
a
mobile
application
that
aims
to
be,
or
that
already
has
53
000
users
influencers
they
do
dowse.
Essentially,
so
every
influencer
can
create
a
community.
A
They
walk
me
through
their
application.
This
week
they
have
six
million
dollars
in
funding
that
they
received
last
year,
so
they're
they're,
well-funded.
A
They
are
running
on
a
private
chain
right
now
and
have
been
doing
so
for
well
over
a
year
they're
based
in
melbourne,
melbourne,
australia.
They
are,
they
have
a
team
of
roughly
45
engineers
and
they
they're.
Some
of
the
names
are,
I
guess,
recognizable
from
early
main
at
launch,
but
the
main
prominent
one
that
reached
out
is
stefan
zhang.
A
Who
was,
I
think,
in
the
first
arbitrator
in
ecaf
he
worked
alongside
thomas
cox.
They
did
a
few
applications
early
on
on
yasayo,
like
the
pixel
games
and
and
betting
games,
and
that
type
of
thing
they
are
a
part
of
the
deakin,
blockchain
innovation
lab
in
australia,
and
they
also
have
another
application
called
original.one,
which
is
a
metaverse
nft,
clothing
type
of
environment
which
which
they're
building
as
well
so
yeah.
A
C
Okay,
thanks
for
that
ease,
so
with
that
background
information,
does
anybody
here
or
of
the
representatives
of
the
chains
vote
against
inviting
them
to
this
meeting
into
this
group?
C
Okay!
Take
that
as
as
a
no
so
so
eaves,
please
move
forward
and
in
inviting
them.
So
I
don't
think
we
have
to
say
anything
about
bullish
or
voice.
So
I
I
categorize,
I
don't
categorize
them
as
one
though
so
is
anybody
against
inviting
bullish
to
the
meetings?
A
C
No
then
we
we
can
proceed
to
invite
all
of
those
three
evs
if
you
would
be
kind
enough
to
do
that,
I'll
I'll,
send
them
the
information.
Yes,.
C
So,
looking
at
the
watch,
the
we
we
didn't
cover
the
branches
here,
which
I
think
is
not
a
big
problem
right
now,
so
we
have
this
p,
a
o
group-
that's
supposed
to
be
meeting
as
soon
as
possible
to
discuss
the
further
procedures
here.
So
my
proposal
would
be
to
move
these
parts
here
to
next
week
to
next
week's
meeting.
C
G
Yeah,
you
know
it's
been
a
big
meeting.
I
talked
through
three
quarters
of
it.
Sorry,
I
think
I
think
if
the
idea
is
to
adjourn
that's
great
and
I
would.
J
G
Meeting,
I
think,
I'm
certain.
I
think
it
might
be
most
effective,
since
this
is
a
new
meeting,
we're
adding
if,
if
others
are
able
to
do
it
on
the
weekend,
meaning
like
saturday,
maybe
that
would
probably
be
our
most
likely
timing
to
be
able
to
find
something
that
everyone
can
isn't
already
scheduled
on.
And
I
it's
fine
with
me.
It's
fine
with.
K
G
What
you
know
what
we're
big
boys,
if
you
have
family
obligations,
you
know
we,
we
don't.
C
C
Sure
it's
gonna
be
okay,
it's
all
fine,
so
just
kidding
good
okay.
So
we
have
this
any
anything
else
that
anybody
would
like
to
add
to
today's
meeting
or
or
add
any
kind
of
comment
for
for
now.
O
Just
before
we
leave
because
it's
the
first
time
I
touch
base
with
you
guys
and
I
just
arrived
in
the
meeting,
if
any
of
you
can
connect
with
me
just
to
brief
me
on
everything,
that's
been
going
on
as
we
all
live,
busy
lives,
taking
care
of
our
own
projects
and
and
all
that
I'd
like
to
just
someone
spending
like
10
minutes.
Just
to
brief
me
on
everything
going
on
yeah.
C
I'll
be
happy
to
do
that.
Rafael.
C
If
you
can
contact
me
on
in
the
telegram
group
which
you're
obviously
part
in
then
it's
custom,
then
then
I
I'll
be
happy
to
kind
of
onboard
you
in
like
10
minutes
perfect.
Thank
you,
yeah
I'll,
bring
you
on
telegram
thanks.
Yeah
that'd
be
great
okay
good,
so
we've
got
that
to
because
I
haven't
received
too
many
emails
of
of
the
participants
joining
the
miro
board.
Please,
if
you,
if
you
haven't
done
that,
please
join
the
mirrorboard
and
use
the
space
for
the
agenda.
C
If
you
want
to
add
some
points
and
also
it's
gonna
make
it
live
easier
for
us
voting,
because
we
have
the
voting
functionality
included
in
the
mirror
board.
So
so
I
I
encourage
you
to
use
the
links
that
you
should
have,
and
I
I
will,
if
you
don't,
have
a
link
via
email.
Please
send
me
a
short
dm
and
I'll
I'll
include
you
in
the
mirror
board.
So
you
have
access
to
everything
good.
C
So,
apart
from
that,
if
nothing's
there
thank
you
everybody
and
wishing
you
all
a
nice
evening
and
stay
healthy.