►
Description
The Antelope Coalition updates the community on IBC governance, IBC side chains, Instant finality and IBC champions, RFP secure smart contract library and more!
Timestamps
00:00:00 Start
00:00:04 IBC Governance
00:03:00 AntelopeIO IBC side chain model
00:06:20 Instant Finality / IBC champions / approvers
00:14:40 Wallet SDK champions / approvers
00:16:01 RFP secure smart contract library
00:27:59 Reprioritization of top development items
00:29:34 End
The EOS Network Foundation coordinates financial and non-financial support to encourage the growth and development of the EOS Network. We’re harnessing the power of decentralization to chart a coordinated future for the EOS Network as a force for positive global change.
// EOS Network Foundation //
https://www.eosnetework.com
https://twitter.com/EosNFoundation
https://www.linkedin.com/company/eos-network-foundation
https://t.me/EOSNetworkFoundation
https://discord.gg/eos-network
info@eosnetwork.com
#EOS #EOSIO #ENF
A
B
We
did
meet,
we
did
meet
last
Friday,
so
I
kind
of
explained
to
the
representative
of
all
chains,
various
questions
and
concerns,
considerations
that
apply
to
IBC
governance,
so
I
think
as
a
as
everyone
realized
and
I
think
they
probably
already
knew.
But
there's
there's
quite
a
few
questions
that
will
need
to
be
answered.
B
B
We're
gonna
do
another
call
tomorrow
at
the
same
time
than
we
did
last
week
and
we're
hoping
to
kind
of
start
providing
some
of
these
Solutions
and
some
of
these
standards
that
will
basically
like
Drive
the
deployment
of
of
IBC
and
rap
tokens
and
such
things
so
yeah.
Another
call
tomorrow,
I
think
with
the
same
people.
A
Okay,
A
little
question
about
that.
Is
there
it's
like
this
is
a
little
bit
meta,
but
is
there
governance
on
the
governance
call
meaning?
Are
we
starting
to
solidify
this
to
potential
project,
action,
items
or
deliverables?
You
know
too
early
for
timelines
and
things
like
that.
But
have
you
thought
about
that
or
do
you
need
Assistance
or
I.
B
Would
think
my
my
my
my
gut
feeling
is.
This
is
probably
gonna
start
the
week
the
next
week
and
and
onwards,
because
to
yeah
like
last
week,
was
really
just
kind
of
bringing
up
to
their
to
the
attention
of
the
Coalition
members,
these
kind
of
questions,
and
then
everyone
kind
of
left
with
the
the
homework
of
thinking
about
it
and
starting
to
discuss,
proposed
Solutions.
B
So
tomorrow,
we'll
we'll
do
another
Roundtable
about
these
ideas
and
solutions
that
were
like
were
floated,
and
we
will
now
start
kind
of
quote,
quote
voting
on
which
ones
that
we
will
want
to
implement,
and
that
would
probably
be
the
week
after
that.
So
it's
a
pretty
big
item.
There's
not
there's
not
like
a
none
of
these
questions
are
easy
to
to
answer,
as
everyone
I
think
realized.
B
B
Maybe,
yes
would
would
get
there
at
some
point
like
quite
could
be
quite
soon,
but
I
think
Telos
and
ux
are
still
like.
The
pressure
is
definitely
not
as
as
as
important.
There
are
some
other
opportunities,
however,
in
terms
of
like
crafting
narrative
and
in
in
order
like,
like
with
regards
to
questions
of
business,
support
development
opportunities
that
may
still
warrant
some
some
discussion,
but
yeah
like
it's
moving
forward.
B
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
a
really
like
it's
a
it's,
a
question
that
each
chain
has
to
like
Ponder
and
meditate
on
their
own,
based
on
their
own
reality,
their
own
objectives,
their
own
governance
rules
and
whatnot.
So
I
think
we
can
probably
remove
it
from
the
the
general
like
I
guess,
like
a
like
Coalition
like
perspective,
it's
going
to
be
really
like
a
chain
by
Chain
basis,
so.
A
B
Exactly
and
implementation
priorities
like
different
different
models
and
whatnot,
so
it's
going
to
be
it's
kind
of
it's
kind
of
like
the
system
contracts
of
each
chains.
They
are
very
different
from
from
one
chain
to
the
other,
just
like
the
side
chain
and
scaling
model
would
be
also
very
different
from
one
chain
to
the
next.
B
So
of
course,
we're
we're
here,
we're
happy
to
help
with
with
like
structuring
these
models
in
a
way
that
makes
sense
and
that
achieves
the
goals
of
each
of
the
chains,
but
I
think
it
falls
outside
of
the
scope
of
the
Coalition,
because
it's
not
like
there's
there's
not
going
to
be
much
much
of
that
stuff
that
can
be.
You
know
like
it's,
not
a
one-size-fits-all
solution.
It's
going
to
be
like
a
case-by-case
basis.
All
right
sounds
good.
A
All
right,
Ted's,
not
here
today,
I-
do
know
that
this
conversation's
in
process,
but
when
he
returns
next
week,
he
can
give
us
an
update
on
the
developer,
onboarding
and
developer
workshops
all
right.
So
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
IBC.
We
know
that
Milestone
3
was
approved.
Do
you
want
to
give
a
quick
status
on
this
I
know
this
is
kind
of
turned
into
a
status
yeah.
B
So
so
I
did
yeah
like
Milestone
3
was
approved,
Eric
thinks
he's
gonna
have
time
to
begin
or
to
to
maybe
hopefully
complete
the
review
of
The
Bridge
contract
next
week.
So
this
is
this
is
what
we're
hoping
for
there
is
in
the
meanwhile,
we
did
deploy
the
IBC
solution
now
to
all
test,
Nets
of
all
the
chains,
so
that
was
not
the
Milestone,
but
we
decided
to
do
it
anyway
to
essentially
like
support
everyone.
B
We
do
have
a
bit
of
testing
to
do
before
we
release
the
updated
from
it.
There's
still
a
few
things
to
to
to
finish
to
era
now,
but
I
think
sometime
over
the
next
few
days,
we
should
have
a
functional
solution
with
the
star
topology,
connecting
basically
like
the
five
test.
That's
the
four
Coalition
chains
and
es
has
two
test
net
for
jungle
and
jungle,
four
and
Thailand.
B
So
now
all
of
these
tests
that
these
five
test
Nets
will
be
meshed
together
for
IVC,
allowing
wrap
token
transfers
between
each
of
them
and
that
that
is
going
to
basically
mimic
the
deployment
setup
that
we're
going
to
have
for
the
maintenance.
Excellent,
that's
great
news,
and
then
we
also
started
working
on
IBC.
Now
that
the
some
of
the
like
the
sorry
about
that
you
see
instant
finality
now
that
IPC
is
getting
to
a
point
where
it's
been
deployed.
It's
at
this
point.
It's
just
just
reviewing
it.
B
We
have
an
audit
by
Sentinel
plan
for
the
end
of
October,
so
we're
still
we're
still.
You
know
like
very
much
on
time
and
actually
a
little
bit
ahead
of
schedule
for
the
IBC
stuff,
despite
despite
like
still
waiting
on
some
reviews.
But
if
the
reviews
are
positive,
then
like
basically
we're
ready
to
deploy
to
mainnet
whenever
and
and
it's
just
a
question
of
deciding
when
the
timing
is
right
from
a
calendar
perspective
with
all
these
assessments
and
all
these.
B
B
C
B
Ibc
IBC
allows
you
to
prove
any
action
that
takes
place
on
a
blockchain
to
another
blockchain,
so
I
like
in
the
context
of
evm,
you
know
like
being
kind
of
emulated
on
top
of
an
antelope
chain.
It
becomes
possible
to
also
I
guess
like
prove
these
actions
to
another
chain
and
to
have
like
some
consequences
program
and
and
like
achieve
the
same
result.
B
But
there
there
has
to
be
like
some.
You
know
like
translation
layers
that
are
built
to
make
it
to
make
it
possible.
Essentially,
so
that's
like
IBC
becomes
possible
as
long
as
these
translation
layers
exist
and
are
available.
So
so
that's
that's
a
bit
telescope
but
like
still
possible,
it's
just
just
a
bit
more
a
bit
more
like
wrappers
to
build
and
handlers
and.
C
B
B
No
problem
so
I
guess
that's
yeah
and
that's
that's
pretty
much
it
for
IBC
now,
for
instance,
finality.
We,
like
I,
said
that
we
we
also
started
working
on
that
part.
So
we've
identified
a
a
framework
for
DLS
signatures,
aggregate
signatures
that
works
very
well.
That
is
actively
developed
and
it's
a
performs
very
well.
So
far,
so
we've
built
we
were
able
to
integrate
it
into
a
like
a
I
guess,
like
a
fork.
B
B
If
we,
if
we
see
that
there
is
another
version
that
is
like
starting
to
emerge,
we
will
rebase
our
our
changes
of
that,
so
that
we
stay
more
or
less
in
in
sync
and
current
with
the
the
version
that
is
available,
but
so
far
we've
been
able
to
build
and
to
create
some
some
unit
tests
using
these
BLS
signatures
within
the
context
of
material.
So
that's
that's
progressing
nicely,
so
I
think
we're
we're
also
going
to
be.
A
A
C
A
C
A
Yeah
I
think
with
this,
and
also
with
IBC.
In
fact,
excuse
me
instant
finality.
We
we
should
look
to
take
those
weekly
status
reports
and
get
them
published,
so
anybody
can
skim
them
at
their
their
Leisure.
As
a
reminder
to
everybody.
This
was
the
same
template
we
discussed
a
couple
months
ago.
It
has
the
typical
things
you'd
find
on
it.
Open
issues
risks
Milestone
progress.
You
know
that
typical
kind
of
stuff,
all
right,
RPC
secure
smart
contract.
A
And
if
you
click
through
on
the
tabs,
they
do
have
like
hourly
breakouts,
and
you
know
the
the
different
types
of
resources.
I
would
say
that
we
are
a
little
late
on
getting
back
to
the
companies,
because
there's
been
a
lot
of
people
out
of
town
and
traveling
inside
the
Coalition
I.
Don't
know
that
we
could
have
helped
that,
but
I
would
say
that
if,
if
you
guys
haven't
read
these
yet
we
should
probably
get
through
them
pretty
quickly.
A
So
we
can
get
this
get
this
work
started,
and
maybe
we
can
schedule
to
have
a
vote
to
release
this
or,
if
there's
open
questions
you
know
kind
of
that
pushback
of
saying,
okay
well,
overall,
this
looks
good,
but
we
want
to
kind
of
work
through
this.
Then
yeah,
let's
try
to
get
that
moving
in
the
channel,
so
we
don't
have
to
lose
a
week
on
this
and
we
can
get
that
going.
Is
that
kind
of
a
good
approach
to
everybody.
B
D
D
A
We've
had
the
previous
rfps
have
been
a
couple
times
larger,
and
so
what
the
Coalition
has
done
is
assign
somebody
to
be
kind
of
a
point
person
to
negotiate,
and
we
can
do
that
again
this
time
as
well.
But
it
seems
to
me
that
everybody
would
at
least
want
to
look
over
the
pricing
and
determine
if
this
is
even
in
the
right
ballpark.
A
D
A
D
Yeah,
so
so
even
I
did
this
on
another.
On
with
on
the
gray
Mass
proposal,
I,
don't
know,
if
that's
like
meant
to
be
a
sort
of
a
ongoing
role.
If
it
is
that's
fine,
I'm
happy
to
to
do
that,
and
then
I'll
dig
in
and
look
at
everything
you
just
need
to
you
know
without
without
it,
without
without
having
anybody.
Basically
I
like
I
like
like
when
people
are
talking
French
I,
pretty
much
just
listened
for
my
name.
D
D
It
does
have
the
risk
of
the
appearance,
the
appearance
of
bias
or
and
I
think
one
of
the
ways
to
address
that
is
just
how
make
sure
that
there's
two
people
you
know
on
any
on
any
such
negotiation
right
because
I,
don't
I,
wouldn't
accuse
anyone
here
of
doing
anything
special
but
are
doing
anything
underhanded,
but
I
I
think
the
it's
that's
not
the
standard.
The
standard
is
too
make
sure
that
we
don't
have
even
the
appearance.
You
know
even
the
appearance
of
possibility
of
of
doing
anything,
because
you
know
that's
yeah.
A
D
C
D
Yeah,
to
be
honest,
mine
is
very
full
too
we're,
in
addition
to
a
lot
of
other
things,
we're
doing
good
block
itself,
we're
doing
we're
preparing
a
a
a
crowd
fund,
raise
a
few
million
dollars
on
Republic
for
d-store.
So
that's
kind
of
all-encompassing
for
us,
but
but
I
know
that
everything
is
all
everybody.
Everybody
is
stuck
to
the
gills,
so
I,
you
know,
try
and
be
mindful
of
that
as
well.
D
You
just
need
to
be
able
to
reach
out
to
a
few
more
people.
This
is
yeah
and
I
apologize
for
being
late.
I
got
held
up
on
on
the
call
that
was
pretty
important,
but
I
think
that
I
think
that
there's
not
very
many
people
here.
Our
attendance
is
dwindled
a
bit
on
this
particular
meeting,
and
you
know
I
think
that
there
are
people
in
the
in
our
own
Community
here
that
we
could
that
we
could
reach
out
to
who
might
be.
You
know
perfectly
capable
of
doing
this
yeah.
A
I
would
just
I
think,
though,
remember
we've
disinvited
quite
a
few
people
from
this
meeting
and
particularly
on
the
enf
side,
so
the
meetings
are
going
to
feel
lighter,
but
we
have
three
out
of
the
four
P
chains
represented
here:
Drake,
even
Ted,
or
not
obviously,
I'm
with
enf.
So
I
can
talk
up
to
a
certain
point.
A
The
question
really
to
the
three
well
has
to
be.
The
two
remaining
change,
because
Guillaume
is
out
is
who's
that
second
person
and
I'll
I
I
will
tentatively
put
Eaves
down,
but
I'll
send
him
a
note
and
confirming
just
for
sake
of
expediency
and
we'll
all
understand
that
if
he
comes
back
and
says
his
calendar
can't
do
it,
then
we've
got
to
pick
this
up
again.
It's
just
we're
already
late.
Getting
this
going.
A
The
other
thing
that
I
would
remind
everybody
is
we're
not
required
to
negotiate
down.
If,
if
the
four
chain
heads
like
the
price
and
they
think
it's
Equitable,
then
that's
what
quote
the
negotiation
is
right.
It's
I've
just
thrown
that
out.
There
is
a.
This,
doesn't
have
to
be
like
10
hours
of
extra
work.
D
Okay,
well,
listen!
If,
if
Eve
or
somebody
from
enf
will
do
it,
I
will
do
it
because
we
just
need
somebody
to
take
charge,
and
you
know
I'd
rather
preserve.
You
know,
Jesse
on
television
side.
Jesse
does
a
ton
of
stuff
on
for
us
on
the
technical
side.
So
I
don't
want
to
burn
him
out
on
this
as
well.
D
A
Absolutely
all
right
documentation
for
Antelope.
This
is
just
a
quick
update.
We
said
we'll
be
around
a
month
before
the
enf
devrel
yeah
devrel
team
can
address
so
we'll
just
kind
of
leave
this
open
for
a
couple
more
weeks
and
then
re-prioritization
of
the
top
items.
Again,
everybody
had
the
had
the
spreadsheet
last
week
we
have
till
next
week
to
add
your
top
five
candidates
by
going
into
that
spreadsheet
and
marking
an
x
on
the
five
ones.
You
like
any
questions
about
that.